|
PCOLA
 |
This is how GM, Ford executives Breana Noble & Kalea Hall General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. are emphasizing their ability to be flexible in responding to consumer demand in light of potential policy changes under President-elect Donald Trump's administration. The incoming administration could see the elimination of the Inflation Reduction Act's tax credit of up to $7,500 on plug-in vehicles, limits on the most aggressive fuel economy and carbon emission policies in the country's history passed by the Biden administration, greater influence from Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk potentially serving in his Cabinet, the renegotiation of the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement and a federal framework for self-driving vehicles. Such changes could slow consumer adoption of electric vehicles and elongate the automakers' recuperation of investments in that technology. "The writing is on the wall," said Daniel Ives, analyst at investment firm Wedbush Securities Inc. "They are going to have to peal back their EV strategy. Until everything is official, everyone will stay middle of the road, but big change is coming." Executives of these two Detroit crosstown rivals both said it's unclear exactly what the future will hold, but they expressed confidence in their companies' abilities to navigate that future long-term. GM Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson emphasized manufacturing flexibility to switch between building internal combustion engine vehicles and EVs. Meanwhile, John Lawler, Ford's chief financial officer and vice chairman, said the Dearborn automaker's strength lies in its existing offerings of gas- and diesel-powered vehicles, EVs and hybrids. Ford is forecasting with various models about potential scenarios, Lawler said. The company already understands that if the tax credits were to end, EV demand and production will decrease unless the company can find a way to bring prices down, though it's already losing money on its EVs. The company last week paused production on its F-150 Lightning truck in Dearborn into the new year to preserve profitability as it projects a $5 billion loss on its Model e EV division. It, however, has eliminated more than $1 billion in costs within the division this year. Consumers aren't willing to pay a premium on EVs, though they are for hybrids, added Sherry House, Ford's vice president of finance and incoming CFO. "What we do is provide choice: ICE, multi-energy hybrid, plug-in, HEV, others," Lawler said. "There'll be other multi-energy choices coming and then EVs, so the strategy is not going to change. We are going to provide consumers choice. They can choose the best propulsion system that fits their duty cycle." Lawler added: "Of course, the IRA plays into it, etc., all that's going to change. So, what we're doing is we're modeling various scenarios, and we will adjust accordingly. We're in pretty good shape, because we do have hybrid vehicles, and we can pivot." GM, on the other hand, doesn't have hybrids in North America after planning to go all in on EVs only to reverse that decision once EV adoption missed expectations. The automaker is planning to reintroduce plug-in hybrids in 2027, because that's the first year of the Biden administration's greenhouse gas tailpipe emission limits. GM also is more vulnerable to a tax credit elimination. Chevrolet has five vehicles that qualify for the full $7,500 and Cadillac has one. Executives expect to produce and wholesale about 200,000 EVs by the end of 2024. Ford has one vehicle that qualifies for the $7,500 tax credit, one for a $3,750 subsidy and luxury brand Lincoln has one eligible for a $3,750 incentive. Jacobson emphasized that the Detroit automaker will continue to reduce its costs and simplify products. The automaker last week announced more layoffs: 1,000 hourly and salaried employees globally in various departments, with a majority working out of the Detroit automaker's Global Technical Center in Warren. "We're going to continue to scale up with demand on the platform that we've established, and we're going to continue to lean into that, because we do believe that EV penetration is a long-term objective," Jacobson said. "We've got to make sure that we have reasonable regulation alongside where consumers are and where demand is. The technology is going to continue to win people over, but we've got to be able to produce vehicles that our customers want, and we have the unique position … of having a lot of flexibility embedded into our operation, to be able to respond to where consumer demand is." He specifically referenced the Spring Hill Manufacturing plant in Tennessee. It's a flexible plant that produces both gas-powered and electric vehicles on the same line. Workers there build the Cadillac Lyriq EV and Cadillac XT5 and XT6 SUVs as well as Honda Motor Co. Ltd. EVs. Jacobson added that GM will work with the incoming administration on the best path forward while focusing on cutting costs. GM has a cost-reduction program with a $2 billion goal it's expecting to hit by the end of 2024. Ford is focused on further reducing costs, too. It has eliminated $2 billion in expenditures this year, and the company on Wednesday announced 4,000 layoffs in Europe by 2027. The company has a $7 billion cost disadvantage to its competition, Lawler said: about $4 billion from warranty costs, $2 billion from materials and $1 billion from footprint. "That's the big unlock for us," Lawler said, "when we think about these product launches." Footprint will change over time, Lawler said, though he noted a heavy U.S. footprint could become more of an advantage in light of potential increased tariffs on Mexican-built vehicles and components. "When we talk about some of our cost disadvantage versus competition, that's part of it," he said, "but maybe that becomes a positive going forward." Meanwhile, with Tesla prioritizing its large-margin business of self-driving semi-autonomous software, creating national standards for the deployment and regulation of that technology could be a priority. Ford especially has emphasized data and telematics software offerings with its Ford Pro commercial business. It also has been expanding the number of models on which consumers can use its BlueCruise hands-free highway driving technology, whose prices it slashed in October. GM has a similar Super Cruise technology. It's also rebooting Cruise LLC, its self-driving business, after a pedestrian crash in October 2023 led to major safety scrutiny. Cruise has started supervised driving in multiple markets. GM recently named Marc Whitten, a former Amazon executive and founding engineer at Xbox, as its new CEO. Cruise was a bragging point for GM at its Investor Day in 2021. Executives boasted the unit could deliver annual revenue of $50 billion by decade's end, helping to double the automaker's revenues to about $280 billion by 2030. At its October 2024 Investor Day event, GM CEO Mary Barra said the company would be disciplined with its investments in Cruise and that it was having discussions with potential partners. "For people that are worried about the future, I don't think GM goes to zero if Cruise isn't successful," Jacobson said. "It's a case of: Can we do what we've been doing really well, and is there a growth story attached to it that comes with software? So we're really prioritizing software execution and getting the vehicles to the level where they can support a whole host of over-the-air upgrades. That takes a little bit of time, but it's progress that we're making." |
US regulators open two Story by Via AP news wire Just days after announcing a civil fine against Ford for moving too slowly on a recall, the U.S. government unveiled two investigations into recalls that may not have worked or covered enough vehicles. The largest of the probes covers about 457,000 Ford Bronco Sport SUVs and Maverick small pickups. In April Ford recalled certain 2021 through 2024 Bronco Sports and 2022 through 2023 Mavericks were recalled because they can suddenly lose power. There have been five complaints from owners whose vehicles lost power after getting the recall fix, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a document posted Monday. The agency will investigate whether the recall was effective. The power loss has been blamed on degraded 12-volt batteries. The other probe covers about 113,000 Ford Expeditions from 2019 through 2020. Ford recalled about 78,000 of the SUVs in February because the driver and front passenger seat belts can tighten up and hold people with no crash apparent. The agency says it has complaints about the problem occurring from three owners whose vehicles were not part of the recall. Investigators will check to see if the recall should be expanded. Ford said it's cooperating in both investigations. On Thursday NHTSA announced that Ford Motor Co. will pay a penalty of up to $165 million for moving too slowly on a recall and failing to give the agency accurate recall information. The agency said the civil penalty is the second-largest in its 54-year history. Only the fine Takata paid for faulty air bag inflators was higher. NHTSA said Ford was too slow to recall vehicles with faulty rearview cameras, and it failed to give the agency complete information, which is required by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Act.
|
Ford agrees to pay up to $165 Tom Krisher DETROIT (AP) — Ford Motor Co. will pay a penalty of up to $165 million to the U.S. government for moving too slowly on a recall and failing to give accurate recall information. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says in a statement Thursday that the civil penalty is the second-largest in its 54-year history. Only the fine Takata paid for faulty air bag inflators was higher. The agency says Ford was too slow to recall vehicles with faulty rearview cameras, and it failed to give the agency complete information, which is required by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Act. Ford agreed to a consent order with the agency that includes a payment of $65 million, and $45 million in spending to comply with the law. Another $55 million will be deferred. “Timely and accurate recalls are critical to keeping everyone safe on our roads,” NHTSA Deputy Administrator Sophie Shulman said in the statement. “When manufacturers fail to prioritize the safety of the American public and meet their obligations under federal law, NHTSA will hold them accountable.” Under the order, an independent third party will oversee the automaker’s recall performance obligations for at least three years. Ford also has to review all recalls over the last three years to make sure enough vehicles have been recalled, and file new recalls if necessary. The company also must review and change its recall decision-making process, improving the way it analyzes data to find safety defects in its vehicles. Ford says it will invest the $45 million into advanced data analytics, a new document system, and a new testing lab. “We appreciate the opportunity to resolve this matter with NHTSA and remain committed to continuously improving safety,” Ford said in a statement. |
Ford sales up 15% in Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose more than 15% year-over-year in October, as truck and hybrid sales propelled the results, while electric vehicle sales declined. Ford sold 172,756 vehicles last month and increased its market share, according to the company. For much of the month a year ago, the United Auto Workers had been striking multiple plants at the Dearborn automaker in targeted walkouts that lasted 41 days until Oct. 25 when the parties reached a tentative agreement promising record wage increases and other benefits. Electric vehicle sales, though, declined 8.3% from a year ago as a result of F-150 Lightning sales falling nearly 50% during the month. Ford says it is idling the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, where the truck is built, starting later this month into 2025 to preserve sales growth and profitability, since the company loses money on the Lightning. The automaker is projecting its Model e EV division will lose $5 billion this year. To boost EV sales, Ford last month launched its "Power Promise" campaign, which includes paying for a Level 2 home charger and its standard installation for EV buyers through the end of the year. Additional incentives are being offered to customers who already have a charger and commercial buyers, too. All-electric Mustang Mach-E sales rose 21%, and E-Transit commercial van sales increased 181%. Internal combustion engine vehicles make up 86% of Ford's sales. They were up 14%. Hybrids rose 39%. Sales of the Lincoln luxury brand were up 36%. Ford truck sales overall increased 29% in the quarter. F-Series sales rose 26%, including F-150 sales up 23% and Super Duty up 31%, according to the automaker, which usually doesn't break out the specifics for those models. The F-150 hybrid saw deliveries increase 51%. The midsize Ranger sold more than 10 times the number of trucks a year ago. Michigan Assembly Plant, where the Ranger is built, was the first plant affected by the UAW strike in September 2023; it also builds the Bronco. The even smaller Maverick posted a 14% increase in sales, including its hybrid version up 47%. The Transit commercial van rose 53%. SUV sales rose 2.3%. Following the launch of the refreshed Explorer, sales were up 3.1% in October. Bronco sales were up 105% and its Sport sibling was up 13%. Escape sales were up 1.7%, and the deliveries of the Expedition rose 12%. At Lincoln, Nautilus sales rose 116%. Aviator was up 38%, and the Corsair increased 14%. Navigator sales fell by 8.7%. A redesign of Lincoln's biggest SUV is coming for 2025. |
US agency ends investigation The Associated Press
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says in documents posted Monday on its website that its analysis traced the problem to intake valves that can fracture inside some 2.7-liter and 3-liter turbocharged engines. Documents say the probe opened in May of 2022 ended up covering more than 411,000 vehicles from the 2021 and 2022 model years including the Ford F-150 Bronco, Edge and Explorer as well as the Lincoln Aviator and Nautilus. The agency was looking into catastrophic engine failures caused by intake valves fracturing, dropping into the cylinder and hitting the piston. The documents say a forensic analysis of fractured valves found that when the they were made by a parts supplier, the temperature got too high, making them brittle and likely to fracture during normal engine use. An analysis of failure report data found that the faulty valves were made from May through October of 2021, the agency said. Ford contended that not all valves produced during this period were faulty and that a vast majority of the failures happened before the vehicles were driven 20,000 miles. An agency statistical analysis to predict the number of failures, and an analysis of failure reports “are generally consistent” with Ford's determination that the valves would fail at low mileage, and the majority of vehicles with the faulty valves “have already experienced a failure,” the agency said. Earlier this year Ford recalled about 91,000 vehicles with valves made during the suspect period. They'll be tested and get a new engine if necessary. The company also extended the warranty on vehicles with valves made during the period to 10 years or 150,000 miles, the documents said. During the investigation, the agency said it found 396 customer complaints, 825 warranty claims and 936 engine replacements. There were no reported crashes or injuries.
|
DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. government's auto safety regulator has ended a 2 1/2-year investigation into Ford engine failures after the company replaced engines or extended the warranty on some vehicles.
“A Slap in the Face”: Ford Story by Camilla Jessen Ford CEO Jim Farley has drawn criticism for driving an electric vehicle from the Chinese tech company Xiaomi. He has openly praised Xiaomi’s latest model, the SU7, calling it “fantastic” and admitting on a recent podcast that after six months of driving it, he would “rather not return it.” But his endorsement has sparked controversy and opposition from various quarters. Jason Isaac of the American Energy Institute is one of the most vocal critics, arguing that it’s problematic for the CEO of an American automaker to drive a Chinese electric car, especially given the substantial tax-funded subsidies Ford receives. Isaac describes Farley’s choice as “a slap in the face” to both American manufacturers and taxpayers. Critics suggest that Ford’s government-backed investment in electrification should come with a stronger commitment to American-made vehicles. The New York Post reports that Farley has been a strong advocate for transitioning to electric cars in the U.S. and has championed Ford’s development of its own EV models. But his choice to drive a foreign car raises questions about Ford’s dedication to American manufacturing and its strategy to lead the national shift to electric. Ford has not yet commented on the criticism. |
Ford Pauses Electric Truck Story by Kathrine Frich Ford Pauses Electric Truck Production Because of Tesla Ford has announced a temporary halt in production of its electric F-150 Lightning truck, largely due to competitive pressures from Tesla’s newly launched Cybertruck. Production Paused in Michigan Production at Ford’s Dearborn, Michigan plant, where the F-150 Lightning is built, will be on hold from November 15 through January 6, marking the second pause in manufacturing this year for the electric pickup. The decision to halt production comes as the electric vehicle (EV) market for pickups grows increasingly competitive, according to Boosted. Tesla’s Cybertruck, which debuted this year, has quickly risen in popularity and has already secured a top-three position among the best-selling electric vehicles in the U.S. This rapid success has put pressure on Ford to reevaluate production of its F-150 Lightning. Despite a substantial 86% increase in sales compared to last year and over 22,000 units sold in 2023, Ford’s electric truck faces strong competition from Tesla’s unique design and marketing appeal, as well as the aggressive pricing strategy for Cybertruck pre-orders. Ford was previously the leading brand in the electric pickup sector, with the F-150 Lightning helping the automaker secure a foothold in the expanding EV market. However, Tesla’s entry into the segment is reshaping the competitive landscape and challenging Ford’s leadership in the electric truck category. The production pause allows Ford to adapt to shifting market dynamics and focus on refining its strategy to meet customer demand and expectations. It’s unclear at this point how the production halt will affect F-150 Lightning delivery times, but the break will allow Ford to assess and adjust to demand more effectively. Ford, like many legacy automakers, is navigating the challenge of balancing its traditional vehicle lineup with the growing investment required for EVs. The company has faced financial strain in its transition to electric vehicles, reportedly incurring losses on every EV sold due to high production costs and ongoing investments in battery technology. |
UAW sets strike authorization Breana Noble A United Auto Workers local representing workers at General Motors Co.'s Fort Wayne Assembly Plant in Indiana is holding a strike authorization vote this week, with leaders saying the automaker is violating the national contract by having managers work on the assembly line, including performing repairs and inspections. The Detroit automaker cut overtime at the plant building profit-rich Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups a few months ago and last month laid off part-time temporary workers after the union and company failed to come up with an agreement to extend their employment, Local 2209 President Rich LeTourneau said. Those events have resulted in managers stepping in to do work reserved for UAW-represented employees, he said. The local on Wednesday is holding a strike authorization among its roughly 3,800 members at the plant. "They are not to touch our trucks," LeTourneau told The Detroit News. "They have continued to cut jobs, and we know some of the work is going to be taken over by artificial intelligence. That is the polar opposite of artificial intelligence. Until that day comes, they need to worry about doing their own jobs, not ours "As long as they keep getting away with it, our jobs are never going to come back." Paragraph 215 of the national contract states, according to an excerpt provided to The News: "Supervisory employees shall not be permitted to perform work on any hourly-rated job" except in emergencies to avoid interruption and in the instruction or training of employees. At least five or six managers work on the line a day, LeTourneau said. In an update on Monday, he said he was challenging GM to allow UAW members to stop the lines at each plant whenever management touches the vehicles. The vote on Wednesday gives the union permission to call a strike but doesn't guarantee one will happen. "The restricted output of these products will be mind-boggling for GM," he wrote, "but will soon understand exactly what I'm talking about, and it won't take but a couple weeks."On Monday, LeTourneau met with Doneen McDowell, GM's manufacturing executive director of truck and large SUV assembly and components operations. "We both agreed that management should not be on my assembly line or any other assembly line at GM," he said, though he confirmed the vote is moving ahead on Wednesday from 5 a.m. to 5 p.m. A GM spokesperson referred to a statement from last week that said GM is abiding by its national and local agreements, and there isn't a practical or legal basis for a strike at the plant. The Detroit News left a request for comment with representatives for the international UAW, who did not immediately respond. GM last month said it was laying off about 250 part-time temps at the end of September. Since last December, the union has sought to make the workers full-time temps, if not permanent employees. The strike authorization vote is "not about temps, that ship sailed," LeTourneau wrote in his update. The Detroit-based union also is threatening to strike Stellantis NV over its delays reopening an Illinois assembly plant. At least three locals in California, Colorado and Illinois have granted strike authorization, but Stellantis has filed nine federal lawsuits, stating it believes a strike would be illegal under the terms of the parties' 2023 collective bargaining agreement, and that the court should intervene to prevent one. The union has called the objections "frivolous." |
Trump unveils plan to revive auto The Detroit News Detroit — Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump pitched Michigan business leaders Thursday on a series of steps he hopes can reinvigorate what he says is a "collapsing" U.S. auto industry, while criticizing Detroit, the city where he was delivering his remarks. The former president said he wants to revisit his own 2020 trade agreement with Mexico and Canada, impose more aggressive tariffs and create large tax breaks for automakers that build factories and do research and development domestically. He also pledged to make interest on car loans fully tax deductible, which he suggested would help both carmakers as well as consumers dealing with high prices. "Your car industry is going out of business. It's going out of business," Trump told members of the Detroit Economic Club, but said a recent "nightmare" for U.S. autoworkers could end if he is elected in November. About 1,000 people attended Thursday's meeting of the Detroit Economic Club at the MotorCity Casino Hotel. In the two-hour speech, Trump labeled Detroit, Michigan's largest city, as more "developing" than "most places in China," at one point calling it a "once great city." At another point, he used Detroit to characterize what will happen to the country if his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, wins the Nov. 5 election. “It will be like Detroit. Our whole country will end up being like Detroit if she’s your president," Trump said. "You’re going to have a mess on your hands.” At the conclusion of the speech, the former president portrayed Detroit as still struggling and said he would create a "Michigan miracle" and the "stunning rebirth" of the Motor City. Trump's comments quickly drew pushback from politicians in Detroit, a Democratic stronghold. "We've got record low homicide rates and we're growing our population for the first time since the 1950s," Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan said on Instagram. "And Detroit's done all of it without a bit of help from Donald Trump." Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Detroiter and the state's chief elections administrator, attended the economic club meeting. "I was shocked to witness him bash our city," Benson wrote on social media. Michigan House Speaker Joe Tate, a Detroit Democrat, added: "Donald Trump might not remember where he is right now, so here’s a quick reminder about what Detroit’s all about. This is the greatest city in the country, and we’ve bounced back after Trump killed our jobs, closed our businesses, and tried to throw out our votes. Detroit threw Trump out of the White House last time, and we’ll do it again." Trump has been endorsed by former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, whose 28-year public corruption prison sentence he commuted in January 2021 before leaving office. David Dulio, a political science professor at Oakland University, predicted that Trump's comments about Detroit would be used by Democrats in a political advertisement in the final weeks of the campaign. In the past, Trump has criticized violence in Detroit, saying in June 2020 "it's like living in hell." He's also been critical of the city over the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. In another White House speech on Dec. 2, 2020, Trump labeled Detroit "corrupt." Biden got 94% of the overall vote in the city while Trump got 5% in November 2020. Victoria LaCivita, spokeswoman for Trump's campaign in Michigan, said the former president "remembers when Detroit was lauded as the gold standard for auto manufacturing success and revolutionized the industry." "As President Trump emphasized in his speech, his policies will usher in a new era of economic success and stability for Detroit, helping the city reach its fullest potential," LaCivita said. Equating tariffs with taxes Trump used Thursday's address to Detroit business leaders to lay out his economic strategy should voters return him to the White House. Tariffs are central to Trump's plan for the auto industry. He said if foreign leaders or CEOs complain about them, he'll tell them to "build it in America, build it in Detroit, build it in Dearborn, or Lansing, or Grand Rapids, or Flint." Trump has proposed a 20% tariff on an unknown number of imported good and raw materials. Harris has criticized his plan, likening it to a national sales tax on consumer goods. In his remarks, Trump described tariffs as a form of taxation that would boost the federal treasury and help pay down the national debt. And he said they would spur onshoring of manufacturing in the U.S. and create jobs. "They're going to come here, and they're going to build here because they don't want to pay those stiff tariffs," Trump said. "... Build it right here in Detroit. You don't have any tariffs. ... You don't have any taxes or tariffs or anything." As president in 2020, Trump heralded replacing the North American Free Trade Agreement with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement or USMCA. Now, Trump said he plans to formally notify Mexico and Canada of his intention to invoke the six-year renegotiation provision of the deal to address concerns he has about China making cars in Mexico to sell into the U.S. He said he would be willing to increase tariffs dramatically to prevent Chinese automakers from importing cars into the United States from factories in Mexico. He added he would create new protections that could thwart the efforts of China and other countries to "smuggle their products and auto parts" into the U.S. indirectly including through Mexico. Patrick Anderson, CEO of the East Lansing-based consulting firm Anderson Economic Group, said while he doesn’t see anything fundamentally wrong with the current USMCA structure, there are concerns that the trade deal being paired with the Inflation Reduction Act, which provides tax incentives for electric vehicles, “will lead to U.S. taxpayers subsidizing Chinese-made battery components that will then come into the U.S. market.” “Taxpayer subsidies flowing to battery production in China, which is heavily dominated by the Chinese government, is a serious threat," Anderson said. "And that's the issue that President Trump has correctly identified with these remarks, although the approach to resolving it is very provocative.” Formally raising the possibility of a renegotiation with Canada and Mexico is a "serious step" that could have unpredictable repercussions, Anderson said. Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents GM, Stellantis and Ford Motor Co., said automakers welcome revisiting the continental trade pact Trump forged during his first term. “The USMCA is vital to the success and global competitiveness of American Automakers. We look forward to working with the next administration during the upcoming six-year review,” said Blunt, a former Republican governor of Missouri. Trump riffed on a number of other auto-related topics during his talk. He said he used to drive two Pontiac GTOs and enjoyed them. He called United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain "your stupid union leader" and "a disaster." He suggested hydrogen-powered vehicles weren't a good idea, because they could be dangerous and explode "violently," describing a person getting blown up, which drew nervous laughter from the audience. On EVs, Trump said they make sense for certain consumers — noting his support from Elon Musk, who heads EV maker Tesla Inc. — but not for semi-trailers or other trucks, because they would make the trucks too heavy, they wouldn't have enough range, and the batteries would take up too much space. Some EV pickups, such as the Michigan-built Chevrolet Silverado, have ranges of 400 miles or more. Trump called the idea of mandating EVs "demented," suggesting it makes sense for the United States to continue to focus on producing gas-powered vehicles, since China already has a leg up on EVs and access to materials for the batteries. "Vote for Trump, and the gasoline engine will be here for a long time," Trump said. Businessman John Rakolta Jr., chairman of the Detroit-based Walbridge construction firm, which builds auto plants, asked Trump questions on stage following the former president's speech. Rakolta, a longtime GOP mega donor, was Trump's ambassador to the United Arab Emirates. And he said he had offered Trump guidance on the auto industry, dating to the celebrity real estate tycoon's first White House campaign 2016. "Mr. President, thank you," Rakolta said as the question-and-answer session ended. "I'm looking forward to all of those auto plants I'm going to be building back here in Michigan in the Midwest." Fain hits back Trump's visit to Michigan — his 12th of the year — came 26 days before the Nov. 5 election and as Democrats, including Harris, are increasingly criticizing his record on manufacturing jobs and his plans for the auto industry. Democrats have contended that Trump's opposition to government programs aimed at promoting electric vehicles will put at risk a $500 million federal grant that Democratic President Joe Biden's administration has awarded to convert a General Motors Co. assembly plant in Lansing for EV production. Asked about the grant on Tuesday, Trump's running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said Republicans want to "invest in Michigan auto workers as much as possible" but he didn't directly answer whether a Trump administration would honor the award. "I think that Michigan auto workers deserve more than the table scraps of Kamala Harris' green new scam," Vance said. On Thursday, Trump did not address the future of GM's Cadillac plant in Lansing — and Rakolta did not ask about it. In a virtual press conference Thursday morning, the UAW's Fain criticized Vance for using the phrase "table scraps" and said Trump would cede the future of the auto industry to China. "For someone running for president of the United States to say, basically, 'I give up. I'm not even going to try because we can't compete with someone else,' that's someone that does not believe in the country, does not believe in the ability of the working class in this country," said Fain, who has endorsed Harris. "We've developed everything in this country. We were the first people to send a man to the moon. ... The sky is the limit for this country." During a Sept. 17 town hall event in Flint, Trump said the United States has gasoline, while China has the materials needed for EVs. “Why are we making a product that they dominate?" Trump said. "They are going to dominate." "You will not have a car industry left, not even a little bit of a car industry," the former president added. During his remarks in Detroit on Thursday, Trump did not talk about whether the U.S. should compete with China in the global EV market. Rakolta, the presiding officer of the economic club meeting, also didn't ask Trump about China. In August, according to preliminary numbers, Michigan had 165,800 jobs in auto vehicle and parts manufacturing. Harris visited Michigan last week for a rally in Flint, where she accused Trump of putting auto industry jobs at risk. Her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, is scheduled to be in Macomb County on Friday. |
Stellantis files more Luke Ramseth Stellantis NV said Monday that it filed nine federal lawsuits against the United Auto Workers and two dozen union locals late last week as it tries to prevent the union from calling a mid-contract strike over its delays reopening an Illinois assembly plant. The company said the series of lawsuits — which the UAW labeled as "frivolous" — prompted a Saturday meeting with the UAW, where the union proposed reinstituting a concept known as the Jobs Bank. The automaker said it rejected this proposal, because it had been "a contributing factor to the automaker's bankruptcy in 2009," adding such a program would "jeopardize the company's future." The maker of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram vehicles filed the first lawsuit Thursday in California, the same day that UAW Local 230 members at Stellantis' Los Angeles Parts Distribution Center became the first local to request strike authorization from the union's International Executive Board. The suit argued a mid-contract strike would be illegal under the terms of the parties' 2023 collective bargaining agreement, and that the court should intervene to prevent one. The company said it filed eight similar lawsuits across the country on Friday, including in Michigan, naming the union and 23 additional locals, as it seeks to prevent any further moves toward one or multiple plants going out on strike. The suits were filed even before many of the locals had held strike authorization votes. The union said Monday that a second UAW local, representing workers at Stellantis' Denver Parts Distribution Center, has also voted overwhelmingly to authorize a strike if needed. In a Monday statement, the company warned that it "will hold the UAW and its locals responsible for lost revenue, which could amount to tens of millions a day, and other damages resulting from lost production due to an unlawful strike." Jodi Tinson, a Stellantis spokesperson, said Monday that more lawsuits were expected to be filed this week. “Stellantis, formerly FCA, formerly Cerberus, formerly Daimler, formerly Chrysler, is following in a long line of failing corporate executives blaming autoworkers for their own mismanagement," UAW President Shawn Fain said in a Monday statement responding to the company. He criticized the automaker for spending money on stock buybacks rather than plant and worker investments in recent weeks. The dispute between Stellantis and the UAW began heating up in August. That's when the UAW warned that its Stellantis locals across the country were filing grievances with the company over its delays reopening the Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois — commitments outlined in the 2023 labor contract after thousands had been laid off from the plant in recent years. The union warned that the grievance process, if unresolved, could ultimately result in a national strike. In addition, UAW locals more recently filed grievances over concerns that Stellantis could be aiming to move production of the Dodge Durango from the Detroit Assembly Complex to a plant in Canada, which the union says would also violate the contract. Both the company and union have been communicating their arguments directly to their employees and membership, respectively, in recent days. A Stellantis executive sent an email to U.S. employees Friday stating the company isn't canceling its Belvidere plans, but needs to delay them due to current market challenges, including a slower transition to electric vehicles than anticipated. UAW leaders also sent a note to members Friday calling the company's efforts an "all-out misinformation campaign in an attempt to scare and confuse us," adding that officials have "complete confidence in our right to strike." There have also been robocalls and Facebook livestreams, as both sides seek to make their case. Stellantis said during the Saturday meeting, the UAW proposed reinstating the Jobs Bank for laid-off employees at Belvidere, as well as "approximately 900 employees who transferred from Belvidere and are working at other locations." But the company "rejected the UAW's latest proposal because it would revert to prebankruptcy terms and conditions that would jeopardize the company's future." Tinson said the proposal was "just not a good idea" as it would mean about 1,800 former Belvidere workers would be paid not to work. Such a proposal is "not sustainable for the company," she said. “Everyone knows the so-called ‘jobs bank’ didn’t cause the 2008 bankruptcies, and autoworkers aren't responsible for CEO Carlos Tavares' mismanagement today," Fain said in a statement. "We are asking that Stellantis keep their contractual commitments and do right by Belvidere autoworkers and autoworkers across the country. If they can’t do that, then the only answer is for autoworkers to join with dealers, suppliers, and shareholders in demanding that Carlos be (fired).” The Jobs Bank was first implemented in the mid-1980s by General Motors Co. and later adopted by Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler, Stellantis' predecessor. Its aim was to protect workers from plant shutdowns and layoffs, and allowed workers to collect most of their pay and benefits even without working, sometimes for years. Kevin Gotinsky, the UAW's Stellantis department director, said the proposal was reasonable. "The jobs bank program offered non-production work to members whose jobs had been outsourced," Gotinsky said in a statement. "If Stellantis lives up to its commitments and reopens Belvidere Assembly and builds the Belvidere parts Megahub, our members will be back to work soon and the cost to the company will be minimal. "These employees can and are willing to perform work today," he added. "That is all they want, to have a future and be able to provide for their families as agreed to in our contract.” |
Ford Claims Consumer Blind Story by Kathrine Frich Ford has made a bold statement regarding the challenges of electric vehicle (EV) adoption. Marin Gjaja, the director of operations for Ford's electric vehicle division, Model e, claims that the primary obstacle isn't the vehicles themselves but the misconceptions held by potential buyers. Gjaja asserts that consumers often misunderstand the benefits of EVs, leading to skepticism about their viability. Ford anticipates losses between $5 billion and $5.5 billion in 2024 for its electric division, underlining the urgency of addressing these perceptions. Many potential buyers remain tied to outdated beliefs about electric vehicles, fearing a loss of convenience compared to traditional cars. Common concerns include range anxiety, upfront costs, and the availability of charging stations, according to Motor. However, Gjaja emphasizes that these worries are often unfounded. For instance, EVs can be charged at home, which eliminates the need for frequent trips to gas stations and ensures drivers start their day with a full battery. Launches Digital Training Platform Models like the Ford F-150 Lightning offer unique features, such as the ability to serve as a portable generator, making them invaluable during emergencies or outdoor activities. To combat misconceptions, Ford has launched Ford University, a digital training platform that employs artificial intelligence to educate both employees and customers about the advantages of electric mobility. Gjaja explains that it's not enough to address the economic concerns of EV ownership; changing consumer behavior is crucial as buyers often weigh perceived losses, like range, more heavily than potential gains, such as maintenance savings. Despite these initiatives, the pace of electric vehicle adoption has been slower than expected. While sales of Ford's electric models have surged by 58% this year, the company has opted to delay new model launches and scale back investments in specialized EV dealerships to align with market realities.
|
Ford to cover cost of home Breana Noble In an effort to boost sales, Ford Motor Co. will cover the cost of a home charging station and its installation starting Tuesday through the end of the year for customers who buy or lease a new electric vehicle. EV sales aren't growing as quickly as the industry had expected. Affordability, availability of charging infrastructure, battery health and convenience remain barriers to EV adoption. Covering the expense of getting a Level 2 charger for customers of Mustang Mach-E SUVs or F-150 Lightning trucks to refuel at home helps to address some of those obstacles, said Martin Delonis, senior manager of strategy for Model e, Ford's EV division. "An electric vehicle fills up when you're not paying attention — passive fueling overnight like charging a smartphone," he said during a virtual briefing on the program. "It's hard for anyone to understand a convenience that didn't exist before. Only half the people we talked to recognize that it was easier to fill up at home and wake up ready to go every day. There's an efficiency there that's not realized, and it takes time to understand it." Ford didn't provide an exact number for the total value of the "Ford Power Promise" fourth-quarter promotion. The charger included is the Ford Charge Station Pro, which retails for $1,310. Installation can cost several hundred dollars more. Customers who already have a charger or are unable to install a charger if, for example, they live in an apartment can receive a discount of up to $2,000 on a new EV over the course of the promotion. Ford Pro fleet customers who purchase the all-electric E-Transit commercial van or another EV will receive a commercial charging cash incentive, Ford CEO Jim Farley wrote in a LinkedIn post. "Filling up at home with electricity can be a significant cost save for many owners compared to filling up with gas. Problem is nearly half of them don’t know how home charging works," he wrote. "Our industry seems to want to answer these questions in a time-honored way — cash on the hood. Cheap lease deals on electric vehicles are popping up everywhere. Ford believes it will take more than jumbo rebates to truly break through with the estimated 19 million people in the U.S. interested in electric vehicles. It will take — you guessed it — convenience, peace of mind and expert service. It will take a modern-day version of the friendly filling station, only this time you 'fill ’er up' at home." Ford customers who already have purchased an EV before Tuesday are ineligible for the promotion, unless they buy another. Ford is working with its charging installation partner, Qmerit. The program covers standard installation, which supports up to an 60 amp circuit and 80 feet of wire run. The charger doesn't use a NEMA 14-50 outlet. If a customer's home requires a panel upgrade, the customer would be responsible for covering the difference for that. The Ford Charge Station Pro can add up to 30 miles of range per hour for the extended-range F-150 Lightning truck, according to Ford's website. Customers can schedule a charge in the FordPass app. The charger also offers bidirectional charging so that if a customer's electricity goes out at home, the EV's battery can send stored energy to power it. U.S. EV sales for Ford, which sells the second-most electric models in the country behind Tesla Inc., were up 58% year-over-year through August. Ford will report third-quarter sales on Wednesday. Chevrolet has offered promotions to cover home charging installation on the purchase or lease of a new 2022 or 2023 Bolt EV or Bolt EUV. The Ford Power Promise also seeks to educate customers on other benefits of buying a Ford EV, said Becca Anderson, senior director for Ford Model e customer success. The Blue Oval Charging Network has more than 75,000 EV chargers; the automaker is shipping adapters that customers can use to charge with Tesla's Supercharger network, and Ford offers an eight-year, 100,000-mile warranty on its EVs' batteries. Additionally, it has a 24/7 EV support line accessible by text or phone. "Shoppers worry about, range, charging, battery health," Delonis said. "These are concerns of owners. This tells us that there's a tremendous perception gap to bridge, and shoppers need help crossing it to make an electric vehicle a real option for fence-sitters. We need to close the gap between perception and reality." |
CPP Pensioners: You’re Story by Andrew Button Did you know that your Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits increase slightly every year? Or at least, most years. The CPP payout is indexed to inflation, meaning that the more the cost of living goes up, the more your CPP goes up. The increases are generally incremental, but in years of elevated inflation, they can be large enough to be noticeable. That’s significant because, ever since the beginning of 2022, inflation across Canada and the Western world has been elevated. In 2022, both Canada and the U.S. experienced inflation rates that approached double digits. Inflation has come down since then. However, the 2.5% year-over-year increase observed in the last month for which we have data, was still substantial. The recent, elevated levels of inflation have bearing on how much CPP you will get next year. In this article, I will explore how much your CPP is likely to increase next year due to this year’s increase in the CPI. How the cost-of-living adjustment is calculated The CPP cost-of-living adjustment is calculated based on the prior year’s inflation rate. “Inflation” here means the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from November two years ago, to October last year. This fact creates some confusion because the “year” here is not a standard calendar year, nor is it the Federal Government’s fiscal year (April 1 to March 31). The reason Statistics Canada uses November 1 to October 31 for calculating the CPI increase is because data sometimes has to be revised. So, the agency needs to use an “early” period in order to publish the data in a timely fashion. Once the StatsCan report is live, the CPP Board can calculate the inflation adjustment. How much you’ll get in 2025 We still don’t have all the CPI data for the November 2023 to October 2024 period, so we can’t say with certainty how much CPP payments will go up in 2025. However, inflation over the last 10 months accounted for 83% of the total inflation for the period that will eventually be reported, and averaged about 3%. So, it’s likely that CPP payments will go up 3% next year, unless there is an unexpectedly large change in the CPP in September and October. |
The pros and cons of The popular advertised ‘pro’ is that you do not have to make any payments on the mortgage loan for as long as you own the home, but the compounding interest accumulates, which can rapidly increase the loan balance. Additionally, this could reduce home equity, potentially limiting inheritance or future financial flexibility. The money you receive is tax-free and doesn’t affect your ability to access the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and the funds can be used any way you wish. When the home is sold or you die, the loan is due with accrued interest, which never exceeds the value of your home. However, there are rules on who can access a reverse mortgage and how much money you can borrow: you must be aged 55 or older, and it must be registered on a principal residence. The funds available are restricted by the home’s value, location and type of structure. Funds are not available over 55% of the value of the home, depending on your age, with the average loan about 30-35% of the home’s value, condition of the real estate market and lender-specific criteria. All existing mortgages and home-equity loans must be discharged so that the reverse mortgage is the first payee. A major ‘con’ is that reverse mortgages are expensive with interest rates 3-4% above regular mortgages and 2-3% above home equity line-of-credit rates, although these rates may vary by province and lender. Other costs include up-front costs which may include property appraisal costs, legal advice and set-up costs for this loan. Although monthly payments seem convenient, you still pay compounding interest, added to the growing loan balance, or you might pay monthly so the total does not increase. Alternatives include a regular mortgage, a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC), and this would be ideal to set up before you retire, by setting up a ‘collateral charge’ essentially an overall credit basket containing both a mortgage and line of credit component. As the mortgage reduces, the line of credit grows. Many choices await seniors, and it is wise to calculate what is needed and the time frame for future needs. Financial advice from a mortgage agent, the importance of consulting both financial planners, estate advisors and mandatory Independent Legal advice, which are crucial steps before entering into a reverse mortgage, is always prudent. |
Workers at GM's CAMI Kalea Hall Autoworkers at General Motors Co.'s CAMI Assembly plant in Ontario on Sunday overwhelmingly approved a new two-year contract between the company and Unifor, the union representing them, that provides pay increases and eliminates what the union called "a historic pay lag" with other Canadian GM employees. Having a two-year deal will put CAMI workers, who approved the deal with 95.7% voting yes, on the same timeline as other Unifor-represented GM employees, who approved new contracts last year. The 2023 GM-Unifor deal, covering GM workers at Oshawa Assembly truck plant, St. Catharines Powertrain plant and Woodstock Parts Distribution Centre, came with wage increases, a reduced progression timeline to get to the top rate, and bonuses. “For the first time Unifor has successfully negotiated a two-year contract term that will align CAMI members with the union’s Detroit Three negotiations to combine the future bargaining power of more than 5,600 GM members," Unifor National President Lana Payne said in a statement. "Never again will CAMI members have to wait to play catch-up on wages and benefit improvements." The new CAMI contract provides three years of wage gains, patterned from the Detroit Three negotiations last year, into the two-year life of the agreement. It includes 15% wage increases for production workers and 20.25% for skilled trades workers. Workers will immediately receive a 10% pay increase with a 2% increase in September 2025 and an additional 3% increase in July 2026. Unifor Local 88 represents more than 1,300 members at CAMI Assembly and Battery Assembly, where they make the Chevrolet BrightDrop EV 600 and EV 400 delivery vans and Ultium battery modules. GM recently brought the BrightDrop electric delivery vans under the Chevrolet brand to expand their reach. “CAMI workers have been trailblazers in the EV transition and our bargaining committee was determined to bring home the wage increases, pension improvements and income replacement measures to protect them during this evolution and position them for the future,” Unifor CAMI Plant Chairperson Mike Van Boekel said in a statement. GM Canada President and Managing Director Kristian Aquilina said in a statement that the company is "pleased our team members at CAMI Assembly, the manufacturing home of the Chevrolet BrightDrop electric van, have ratified a new agreement that supports our employees and our business. I am excited by the opportunity ahead as BrightDrop joins the Chevrolet brand, further strengthening GM’s commitment to electric mobility. Our vehicle production and battery-module assembly operation at CAMI helps position GM as a leader in Canadian EV supply chain development, manufacturing and export. " Unifor’s next round of negotiations with the Detroit Three will take place in the fall of 2026. The CAMI deal's highlights include:
Local 88 Contract Brochure Sept 2024 - Download here |
GM, Unifor reach tentative Kalea Hall General Motors Co. and Unifor, the union representing autoworkers in Canada, reached a deal early Wednesday on a new agreement for the CAMI Assembly and battery assembly facilities. Specifics on the agreement, which was announced after 3 a.m., weren't disclosed. Details will first be released to union members of Local 88 at a Sunday, Sept. 22, ratification meeting. Before the previous contract expired at 10:59 p.m. Tuesday, GM and the union extended the bargaining deadline and continued negotiating through the night. GM and Unifor kicked off negotiations last week for a new agreement. Unifor Local 88 leaders, representing workers at the country's first large-scale EV assembly plant where Chevrolet BrightDrop electric vans are built, likely sought to follow the pattern set by the union during 2023 bargaining with GM, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. The 2023 GM-Unifor deal, covering GM workers at Oshawa Assembly truck plant, St. Catharines Powertrain plant and Woodstock Parts Distribution Centre, came with wage increases, a reduced progression timeline to get to the top rate, and bonuses. More than 1,100 union members work at CAMI Assembly building the newly rebranded Chevrolet BrightDrop EV 600 and EV 400. About 200 members work in battery assembly at the plant. “We had very clear goals heading into bargaining set by our members and I believe that we have reached a tentative agreement that reflects those goals," Unifor Local 88 Plant Chair Mike Van Boekel said in a statement. "I want to thank our members for their support and solidarity throughout bargaining and our entire negotiating team for working around the clock to secure a contract that we can be proud of." In a statement, GM Canada said: "This agreement, subject to member ratification, recognizes the many contributions of our represented team members with significant increases in wages, benefits and job security." |
GM, Unifor enter talks for new Kalea Hall General Motors Co. and Unifor, the union representing Canadian autoworkers, kicked off negotiations for a new agreement that will seek to ensure stability amid the ups and downs of the electric-vehicle transition for 1,300 workers who build electric delivery vans. Unifor Local 88 leaders, representing workers at the country's first large-scale EV assembly plant where Chevrolet BrightDrop electric vans are built, plan to follow the pattern set by the union during 2023 bargaining with GM, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. The 2023 GM-Unifor deal, covering GM workers at Oshawa Assembly truck plant, St. Catharines Powertrain plant and Woodstock Parts Distribution Centre, came with wage increases, a reduced progression timeline to get to the top rate, and bonuses. Unifor, after shutting down for months for battery module supply issues, will also push for job-security assurances as GM works to build demand for the now Chevrolet-branded electric vans. The CAMI agreement expires Sept. 17. CAMI previously produced the gas-powered Chevrolet Equinox before GM invested $1 billion there for electric van production. GM introduced BrightDrop in 2021 as a startup that would generate billions in revenue. The first BrightDrop vans came off the assembly line in December 2022 and since then the workforce has experienced fluctuating production schedules. In 2023, GM brought BrightDrop under GM Envolve, the company’s fleet business, which was formed in May that year. Production of the BrightDrop vans halted in October as GM dealt with a battery module supply issue. The plant restarted in the spring operating one shift, with two groups of employees working two weeks on and two weeks off. GM announced last week it's bringing BrightDrop under the Chevrolet brand. In addition to the vans, about 300 CAMI workers make battery modules for the BrightDrop vans and EVs built at other GM plants. In a statement, GM said it's "committed to working with our Unifor partners to reach a mutually beneficial agreement." “Our members at CAMI are on the frontline of the EV transition in Canada, and Unifor will fight to protect the good union jobs and secure the future every autoworker was promised,” Unifor National President Lana Payne said in a statement. “These negotiations will focus squarely on securing workers the economic stability our members deserve and that includes aligning CAMI workers with the rest of our GM membership to eliminate the historical lag in wage increases and other negotiated benefits.” Unifor Local 88 members at CAMI overwhelmingly support a mandate to strike if necessary, with 97% voting to support strike action if an agreement is not reached before the deadline set for 10:59 p.m. Sept. 17. Unifor CAMI Plant Chairperson Mike Van Boekel in a statement said the union's "focus remains on obtaining a contract that gives our members a good, predictable income, allows them to retire with dignity and offers opportunity to the next generation of autoworkers." The GM-Unifor three-year deal reached last year provided base hourly wage increases of nearly 20% for production employees and 25% for skilled trades workers over the lifetime of the agreement with increases of 10% in year one, 2% in year two and 3% in year three. By the end of the pact, a top-rate production assembler will be paid $44.52 Canadian per hour, in addition to a forecasted $1.61 cost of living allowance for a total $46.13 per hour wage. A journeyperson skilled trades worker will be paid $55.97 per hour, which will increase to $57.58 with COLA. GM also agreed to cut in half the time it takes to get to top wages to four years, and provide a $10,000 productivity and quality bonus for full-time employees (including current temporary full-time employees), as well as a $4,000 bonus for temporary part-time employees. |
More than gas: Find out Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. on Thursday said its U.S. sales in August rose 13% year-over-year, as freshened trucks and SUVs supported growth for the month. The Dearborn automaker sold 182,985 vehicles in August with the automaker saying it secured a 12.6% market share to be the best-selling brand for a second consecutive month. Sales are up 4.3% through the first eight months of 2024. August tends to be a big selling month as automakers offer incentives to get current-year models off dealer lots as the new model year launches. Cox Automotive Inc. was forecasting a seasonally adjusted annual sales pace of 15.4 million vehicles. At Ford, all vehicle categories by type and powertrain saw growth in August: Trucks were up 12%, SUVs grew by 14%, the Mustang coupe increased by 55%, hybrids were up 50%, electric vehicles rose by 29% and gas- and diesel-powered vehicles were up 9.9%. F-Series trucks, the country's best-selling nameplate whose refresh launched earlier this year, surpassed 70,000 monthly sales for the first time this year. That represented a 12% sales increase from the same month in 2023. Included in that is all-electric F-150 Lightning sales, which rose 161%. The F-150's hybrid model was up by 46%. For midsize trucks, Ranger sales rose 174% after the launch of a new model this year. Sales of Maverick, which is getting a refresh for 2025, rose 24%. Maverick's hybrid version grew by 67%. Ford brand SUVs were up 9.8% in August. Deliveries of the updated Explorer began last month, securing a 97% increasing in monthly sales. All-electric Mustang Mach-E sales rose 6.1%, notching its third best sales month since its launch in 2021. Escape sales rose 10%, and the Bronco Sport, which gets a refresh for 2025, was up 9.3%. Sales of the larger Bronco fell by 3% and the Expedition by 18%. Meanwhile, sales of the Ford Transit commercial van fell 8.5% in August. That included a 6.7% of the all-electric E-Transit. Ford recently said it will launch a new all-electric commercial van in 2026 in Ohio. Sales at the Lincoln luxury brand rose 49% in August. The new Nautilus saw a 57% increase, its best August sales performance in 17 years. Of that, 48% of the models sold were hybrid. The updated Aviator began hitting dealer lots in July, and sales were 45 times greater in August than a year ago. Corsair sales fell 17%. Navigator sales were down 2.2%, though the SUV is getting a refresh for 2025 to complete a fully freshened Lincoln lineup since the 2023 Corsair. General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV report U.S. sales on a quarterly basis. In August, U.S. sales of Honda Motor Co. Ltd. rose 25%, Kia Corp. increased by 4%, Subaru Corp. was up 12% and Mazda Motor Corp. grew by 37%. |
'Built wild': Bronco Sport Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. is leaning into what it sees as an underserved market with a refresh on the Bronco Sport for 2025 with expanded availability of the Sasquatch off-road package, updates to its technology and new features to tackle adventures. Since it launched for the 2021 model year, Bronco Sport has attracted buyers looking for an SUV capable of off-roading, but at a more accessible price point than its larger sibling. Ford has carved out a niche in the segment, and it's taking advantage of that advantage among a crowded marketplace of SUVs, the team behind the vehicle said. Orders for the new model year open Monday with deliveries beginning in November from its plant in Hermosillo, Mexico. Ford will share pricing at a later date. The 2024 model starts at $29,795. "When we relaunched Bronco Sport in 2020, we started to reach a part of the market that a lot of people didn't think existed," said Michael Weller, brand manager for the vehicle. "Our customers seek out challenges. They want to climb that mountain or go down that more challenging hiking trail, because accomplishing that and achieving that gives them this great sense of satisfaction. "... 'These people don't buy small SUVs' was the conventional thinking," he continued, "because nothing really existed that appealed to them. So we gave them Bronco Sport, and we're really reaching these buyers." Weller pointed out that Bronco Sports are from full-size pickup trucks, not SUVs. He said Bronco Sport owners go off-roading three and a half times more frequently and fishing two times more often than drivers of other small SUVs. Bronco Sport U.S. sales are down 3.8% through July. The volume still is more than the larger Bronco, whose plant was hit by last year's United Auto Workers strike. The baby Bronco also achieved the top spot for small SUVs among 18 models for initial quality by J.D. Power. "We wanted to make sure we would meet all of our durability and robustness ... requirements," said Eddie Khan, vehicle engineering manager, noting that developers visited more than 50 off-road venues to speak with customers about their experiences with the SUV. "We have tested more than 600,000 miles on durability testing on these vehicles during the process of development on various terrains and various locations." Bronco Sport gets new front and rear bumpers with steel bash plates equipped with "Bronco Bolts" detachable by an Allen wrench to accessorize with brush bars, driving lights or mounts for dune flag. There are two hooks in the front and cast D-rings in the rear. A front brush guard is standard, and the vehicle also has steel skid plates. There isn't an electrified option for the Bronco Sport. Weller said the automaker has seen customer interest and "anything's possible in the future," but an electrified Bronco Sport would have to meet the brand's performance requirements. "We've got to do it right," he said. Previously available on the 2-liter Bronco Sport Badlands model, the Sasquatch package is being expended to the 1.5-liter Bronco Sport Outer Banks trim. Sasquatch models will be available in the first quarter of 2025. The package offers a twin-clutch rear-drive unit and locking rear differential to better handle rugged terrain. Ford and Goodyear also developed larger 29-inch 235/65/R17 Territory All Terrain tires adapted from the Bronco with an open-tread design and reinforced sidewalls to provide better traction. The 2-liter engine has capacity for up to 2,700 pounds of towing. Bilstein rear shocks with position-sensitive damping and piggyback reservoirs replace Bronco Sport Badlands’ standard monotube off-road dampers to better absorb impact at higher speeds. New front and rear springs increase ride height four-tenths of an inch over the current Bronco Sport Badlands, while the Sasquatch model has up to up to 8.3 inches of front suspension travel and 8.7 inches of rear suspension travel, an increase of six-tenths of an inch. The Sasquatch package also augments Ford's Sand GOAT Mode, Goes Over Any Type of Terrain, with a new Rally Mode focused on holding gears longer at higher speeds in sand to boost power on-demand, sharpen the throttle response and increase feedback through the vehicle's steering. Every Bronco Sport will come standard with a new Off-Road GOAT Mode. "It's built wild in line with with the Bronco brand tenets," Weller said. Bronco Sport Trail One-Pedal Drive also joins Trail Control for rock crawling, allowing the driver to use only the accelerator pedal to control the speed of the vehicle. Easing off the accelerator engages the brakes and releasing it brings the vehicle to a halt. The lower-trim Bronco Sport Big Bend has an off-road option, as well, with the new Black Diamond Off-Road package. Like Sasquatch, it adds four recovery points, up to 2,200 pounds of towing capacity and additional steel underbody protection. Inside, Bronco Sport gets a 13.2-inch center display, up from 8 inches on the current model. Powered by the Sync 4 infotainment system, the vehicle's software is updateable over-the-air and supports wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. A 12.3-inch driver digital instrument display includes Bronco Raptor-inspired animations that appear when the GOAT mode changes. Likes its larger sibling, the Bronco Sport is available with an "Bring Your Own Device tray" located atop the dash behind the center display that has two USB-C inputs. It's designed with a GoPro in mind, but also can hold a phone, wallet and keys. The front passenger also gets a new counsel-mounted grab handle. "Bronco is about modularity and ease of accessorization," Weller said, "and we lean into that heavily with the 2025 update." New exterior colors include Velocity Blue and Ruby Red Metallic. Outer Banks has a new Platinum Blue interior theme, and Badlands Sasquatch is noted with yellow stitching. Safety systems in Ford Co-Pilot360 Assist+ are standard. The 2.0 package optional on the Bronco Sport Outer Banks and standard on the Bronco Sport Badlands adds a 360-degree camera with Trail View to show tire overlays automatically in Off-Road and Rally modes as well as Split View that shows the front tires. It also includes Reverse Brake Assist and Speed Sign Recognition. Ford on the Sasquatch models also added four auxiliary switches under the hood in the dash to power on and off attached devices like camping lights, addressing what Khan said had become a "cumbersome" issue with the current model. On Outer Banks Sasquatch, Badlands and Badlands Sasquatch models, new integrated tie-downs can help secure rooftop loads like kayaks or paddleboards. Rated to up to 150 pounds, they stow in the fenders. "We as a team went out for camping, we had a kayak, and we really had a very difficult time to find a suitable tie-down point in the front of the vehicle," Khan said. "And that came about the idea of introducing something in the fender to tie it down." |
Ottawa is imposing tariffs by Uday Rana Ottawa is imposing higher tariffs on electric vehicles made in China, along with a higher tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum. Some experts are warning that in the short term, buying an EV could get costlier for some Canadians. Speaking at the Liberal cabinet retreat, Trudeau said, “Shortly, we will be introducing a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles and a 25 per cent tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum.” He said this was being done to spur EV manufacturing in Canada. The announcement brings Canada in line with recent U.S. trade policy changes. President Joe Biden announced in mid-May that he was hiking tariffs on Chinese EVs from 25 per cent to 100 per cent this year. Erik Johnson, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, said Canada had little choice but to align with the U.S. seeing as nearly 80 per cent of the cars made in Canada are sold south of the border. “If you were to do anything that might jeopardize your very strong market access to the U.S. economy, that would potentially be devastating to an industry,” he said. In June, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland told reporters that the federal government was concerned by “unfair” Chinese trade practices in the electric vehicle manufacturing sector. Freeland announced the start of a consultation process. Freeland in her June announcement had indicated what the restrictions might look like. “The potential policy actions we are consulting on include a surtax on imports of Chinese EVs under Section 53 of the Customs Tariff Act, changes to which cars are eligible for the existing federal incentives for Zero Emissions Vehicle Program, and potentially broader investment restrictions in Canada,” Freeland said at the time. Chinese-made EVs occupy a very small segment of the Canadian market, Johnson said, however Chinese automaker BYD has been looking to expand to the North American market by way of a manufacturing facility in Mexico. Well, Canada has attracted significant investments in the electric vehicle Two of the most popular EVs in Canada -Tesla Model Y and Tesla Model 3 - are both produced by the U.S. maker in its Chinese facility. “That really would be the core product segment that's going to feel the immediate impacts when these tariffs go into play,” he said. However, he said that could change if Tesla moves its facility out of China. Moshe Lander, an economist at Concordia University, said even if Tesla moves out of China, there’s no guarantee that the company is going to move to Canada and spur manufacturing here. “It's not like all of a sudden Tesla are going to say, well, I guess we better relocate to Canada now because there's 100 per cent tariffs on China. We're talking about a very large company that has its choice of anywhere to operate in the world,” he said. Lander said a surtax of 100 per cent gives Canadian manufacturers more leeway in raising prices. “Canadian manufacturers now have cover to increase their prices,” he said. “If you're going to have to pay a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese imported EVs, then why can't a domestic producer increase their price by 50 per cent, 75 per cent or 99 per and cent say it's still a better deal than if you're going to get [one] from China?” Johnson said the federal government would hope that the tariffs would give local manufacturers time to catch up to Chinese competitors and encourage foreign players to manufacture in Canada. BYD already has an electric bus manufacturing facility in Newmarket, Ont. However, he said Canada’s EVs sector was facing its own set of issues. In July, American auto giant Ford said it was going to continue to manufacture gas-powered trucks at its Oakville, Ont., facility, despite the provincial and federal governments pushing for more EV development and spending billions of dollars to attract electric automakers to Ontario as part of a bigger push to build those industries. Johnson said while EV sales might take a hit in the short term, consumers are like to shift to other alternative fuel vehicles like hybrids. “We're seeing hybrid sales certainly do very well this year in both Canada and the United States,” he said. Johnson said given the cost of living crisis, the Canadian consumer could also be turning away from larger vehicles, preferring compact and subcompact cars instead of SUVs. “One of the things that we're seeing consumers do in the current cost of living environment is they're trading down size,” he said. “I might be willing to compromise a little bit more on size if it means one saving on the price point, but also have a lower operating cost of that vehicle.” |
This Was Not A Great Week Story by Patrick George Let's game out what this week's news meant for the EV transition at Ford, GM, Volkswagen and Hyundai. Plus, Volvo has big plans for EX90. Sometimes, when I look back at the commitments many so-called "legacy" automakers made to go fully electric and software-powered one day, it feels like all of them thought: "How hard can it be, right?" As we saw this week, the answer is "very hard." And one day, we may all look back on 2024 as the most chaotic year of the transition to a cleaner and For this Friday edition of Critical Materials, our morning roundup of news about the EV transition and technology, I want to look back at some wins and losses from several of the big players and parse out what it means for what's next. Let's face it: this was not a great week for several big, legacy automakers trying to figure out what's next. We'll start with Ford, since that was the big one. A few years ago, Ford decided to separate out its sales and financial results into three divisions: EVs, traditional gas vehicles and its commercial operation. At least one goal was to "unlock Tesla-like value," to drive up the stock price by showing investors—who care about the future—that it was progressing like a big tech company. It hasn't worked. Instead, the continual losses of the electric Model e division kind of made Ford a punching bag. Every quarter and at least once a year, the headlines and investors gripe about the billions in losses and mounting costs around going electric, even if that is to be expected for ramping up an entirely new supply chain and manufacturing ecosystem. It turns out the investors care about their future, but also want their money right now. Those losses, and the newfound belief that battery costs won't ever make big electric SUVs and trucks truly viable, meant a strategy shift this week: Ford is canceling a three-row electric SUV, pushing back a new electric truck and focusing on hybrids instead. As my colleague Kevin Williams pointed out, this means that besides a new electric commercial van, Ford won't have any new EV models until 2027. That's three years away; three years ago, I'd wager most of the vehicles we write about on InsideEVs didn't exist yet. There are two ways to read Ford's news this week. The generous read is that Ford is doing what it can to keep investors happy, as any publicly traded company must; that the truly telling move is that Ford isn't slowing down on battery plant investments; and that it may well be right about hybrids being a better solution for bigger vehicles. But if you want to go glass-half-empty, then we could look at this week as the one where Ford began its transition to just being a gas-powered truck company someday—one that could never make EVs work in volume and will be a kind of John Deere-type company in the subsequent decades. Give Ford an excuse, in other words, and it will take the easy way out. Market realities are one thing, sure. But so far, Ford's path to EV profits seems dismal. It needs a reset, and pushing those products back to the latter half of this decade—where it may even have to compete with China's automakers in America—is a huge gamble. Then we have Volkswagen, the original "pivot to EVs" automaker. The long-awaited ID. Buzz is finally coming to America after a development cycle that makes a new Tesla look punctual, and the price and specs just do not feel competitive. And after "indefinitely postponing" the ID.7 sedan for America, Volkswagen has in the pipeline... what, exactly? More mainstream-looking EV models coming, we think, but again, not until the latter part of this decade. And then it may have tougher competition than ever. Ford, thankfully, is not VW, which only has around 4% market share in the U.S., still lacks a strong brand identity here and just doesn't have that compelling of a lineup beyond the ID.4 (which, admittedly, is better than ever) and the GTI and Golf R. We are getting to a point where it's worth asking if the U.S. market needs the VW brand at all; it had better have an answer to that before the day comes when it has to go up against BYD and the like on our shores. Next up is General Motors, which is actually in the midst of a pretty good year for EV releases and sales. But it still laid off 1,000 software and services employees this week in an effort to "streamline" operations and, based on all we've heard, reduce bloat and bureaucracy. Again, the generous read is that under its new software leadership, GM is taking steps to focus on power-hitter hires and be the best in the game; the less generous read is that it still hasn't figured out its software game. And 1,000 software engineers say they were "thrown onto the curb like useless trash." It's just very unfortunate. You can't expect car companies to make unprofitable products forever, and sure, they're all reckoning with rapidly changing buyer tastes—people want plug-in hybrids now, actually!—in a capital-investive environment that takes years of planning and development. Yet it does feel like many of them should've figured this out by now. And it's only fair to begin wondering if they ever can, or if the plan is to just pivot back to gas cars like they've always done. So what are the two exceptions I put in that headline? Well, Hyundai Motor Group (whose executives have claimed to us that their EVs are profitable) is now the no. 2 EV seller behind Tesla in the U.S. And BMW just outpaced Tesla's EV sales in Europe. True, both situations were "helped" by Tesla's lost sales momentum. Still, both are remarkable achievements. One Honda executive is probably right: you can't force people into EVs. But in the next few years, we'll find out who's actually serious about making the technology of the future work, and who just expected customers to show up like they always have. 60%: Volvo Needs A Win With The EX90 That was a long time to charge up to 30% (Critical Materials is an old Nissan Leaf today) so I'll be quicker on these next two items. You'll read a full review of the new, electric Volvo EX90 from Deputy Editor Mack Hogan next week, but make no mistake: this is a big deal for the Geely-owned Swedish brand. From Automotive News, which begins with Volvo's sliding electric sales: But Michael Cottone, Volvo Cars' U.S. boss, hopes to change that trajectory with a pair of next-generation crossovers that will bookend the brand's EV lineup and reach crucial new audiences. At the top end is the new three-row EX90 flagship expected to glide into stores in late 2024. It will be followed by Volvo's most compact and least expensive model — the EX30 crossover — in the second half of next year. "[The EX90] is the first car that we will have launched and developed outside of Europe in our company's almost 100-year history," Cottone said at an Aug. 21 media event in Southern California. "This car was designed for the U.S. market and then built in the U.S. market." [...] Volvo dealer Matthew Haiken said the EX90 will resonate because it is an evolution of a familiar design. The new model has the DNA of the XC90, which Haiken said has become a classic like the Range Rover or Porsche 911. "Most EVs look like computers on wheels," said Haiken, owner of Prestige Collection, which operates Volvo stores in East Hanover and Englewood, N.J. "The EX90 is the antithesis of the Tesla Model X." After months of delays due to software issues (here we go again) Volvo officials say they will be careful here to allocate EX90 volume to the right places that can meet demand: "California, the Northwest and the Mid-Atlantic region." Also, did you know the XC90 is still Volvo's bestselling model and accounts for almost one-third of its volume? I did not. That's also why Volvo is bringing back the XC90 as a heavily refreshed plug-in hybrid; I'm wondering if that was always in the cards, or if it's hedging its bets in case the EX90 doesn't take off. 90%: Do Not Think For A Second That BYD Isn't Serious About Mexico And here, finally, is why complacency is not an option. Mexico's federal government is under pressure from the U.S., its biggest trading partner and ours, not to give incentives to the Chinese automakers to set up factories there. But nothing is stopping the local governments in Mexico from doing that, and Reuters reports that's coming right along: Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD has narrowed its list of finalists for the location of a manufacturing plant in Mexico down to three states and is reviewing a range of proposed incentives from them, the firm's country head said on Wednesday. Jorge Vallejo, BYD's Mexico director general, told Reuters the company was reviewing the latest proposals by the candidate states, which have offered "many benefits" including fiscal, land, management and preferential pricing incentives. Mexico's northern Nuevo Leon state is an automotive hub, and the location of a proposed Tesla mega-factory. It will also be home to a new Volvo plant, the state's governor said this week. BYD executives swear that they aren't eyeing the U.S. market and a Mexican factory would be focused on that country's market and the rest of Latin America. If you truly believe that, email me, because I have a bridge to sell you. Tariffs will only keep these automakers out of the U.S. for so long; they had better come up with a way to compete, and 2027 may be too late. 100%: Who Wins The Future, And How? To his credit, I do think Ford CEO Jim Farley gets the threat to his company posed by China. "As CEO of a company that has had trouble competing with the Japanese and South Koreans," Farley said this earlier year, "we have to fix this problem. We have to address this." He's right, too—and I think he's probably right about huge expensive batteries not being the answer. So how does Ford, or any of these companies here, fix that problem? What aren't they doing now that they should be?
|
Ford ditches new EV in Alice Wright For Dailymail.Com Ford has abruptly cancelled plans to produce a three-row electric SUV, and has delayed building a new EV plant in Tennessee. The pullback marks a major shift for the car company, amid slowing demand for electric cars. Axing the electric SUV and pulling back on its new plant plans could cost the carmaker around $1.9 billion. The video player is currently playing an ad. You can skip the ad in 5 sec with a mouse or keyboard The manufacturer will also drop its spending on EVs to 30 percent of its annual investment, down from 40 percent. Ford will now focus on developing hybrid and more affordable models, the company said on Wednesday. The now-delayed plant in Tennessee, which is still under construction, is meant to be producing a next-gen full-size electric pick-up. Ford already expects to lose $5.5 billion from its EV unit this year alone. 'This is a tremendous pivot for us, and we're not going to make a tremendous pivot without doing a lot of homework to convince ourselves this is the exact right plan,' CEO Jim Farley said of the shift. 'I'm very confident,' he added. Ford said shifting its EV strategy, including rethinking its battery-sourcing, is in part due to the need to compete with lower-cost Chinese options. 'An affordable electric vehicle starts with an affordable battery,' Farley said. 'If you are not competitive on battery cost, you are not competitive.' Despite the pullback Ford's EV business continues to grow, with its Ford F-150 Lightning the best-selling electric truck in the country. Yet Americans are increasingly put-off by the cost of EVs, concerned by their battery range and increasingly interested in hybrid models. By focusing more on hybrids, longer ranges more affordable vehicles Ford is aiming to assuage these concerns and meet customers where they are. 'We learned a lot as the No. 2 U.S. electric vehicle brand about what customers want and value, and what it takes to match the best in the world with cost-efficient design, and we have built a plan that gives our customers maximum choice and plays to our strengths,' Farley explained. It comes after electric car maker Tesla reported last month its profits dropped 45 percent in the second quarter of the year, as Americans' demand for electric vehicles slows. In the face of falling interest in EVs, Elon Musk's company had been forced to offer discounts and cut prices to lure in buyers - piling pressure on profit margins. The electric car manufacturer also had a significant number of unsold vehicles on its books at the end of the first quarter of the year. The company's global deliveries fell 6.5 percent in the first half of the year as American's demand for EVs has continued to soften. However, Tesla said it was on track to roll out a cheaper EV, said to cost around $25,000, by early 2025 - which analysts say will boost sales. |
Ford recalling about 85,000 Michelle Chapman Ford is recalling approximately 85,000 Explorer Police Interceptor Utility vehicles because the engines may fail prematurely and possibly result in a fire. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Friday that the recall is for vehicles with model years 2020 to 2022 and have 3.3L hybrid or gas engines. The NHTSA said that if an engine failure occurs, significant quantities of engine oil or fuel vapor may be released into the under hood area and may migrate to and accumulate near ignition sources, resulting in a potential under-hood fire, localized melting of components, or smoke. The agency said that as of July 9, there are 13 reports of under hood fires in North America resulting from engine block breaches on Explorer PIU vehicles built with 3.3L engines made before June 2, 2022. There are no reports of fire resulting from engine block breaches on non-police vehicles. Ford isn't aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this condition, the report said. The automaker will be mailing a letter to vehicle owners advising them that the investigation is ongoing and that they will be contacted when further information is available. Ford will also advise customers in the letter to safely park and shut off the engine as soon as possible when they hear unexpected engine noises, or after experiencing an unexpected torque reduction, or see smoke from the engine compartment. A service remedy is currently being developed. Parts and software are expected to be available in the second quarter of next year. |
Ford, Mazda warn owners to Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. and Mazda Motor Corp. on Tuesday issued a do-not-drive advisory on certain vehicles that haven't been repaired under past Takata air bag inflator safety recalls. The age of the vehicles makes it increasingly possible a part inside the air bag will explode and release sharp metal fragments during a crash, according to Ford's advisory. Serious injury or death to occupants could result. The Dearborn automaker is requesting that owners immediately contact a Ford dealership to have mobile service come to the customer to make the fix or to tow the vehicle to the dealership for repair. A free interim loaner vehicle will be provided, if necessary. The do-not-drive advisory applies to all customers who have not completed recalls of driver and passenger Takata non-desiccated air bag inflators in 2004-2006 Ford Ranger trucks, 2005-2014 Ford Mustang vehicles and 2005-2006 Ford GT vehicles. It also included unrepaired passenger airbag inflators in the following: 2006-2012 Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln MKZ and Zephyr vehicles; 2007-2010 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles; and 2007-2011 Ford Ranger trucks. Three previous recalls, the first of which was issued in 2015, cover approximately 765,600 air bag inflators in Ford and Lincoln vehicles globally. That includes 374,300 in the United States, 95% of which have been completed, according to the automaker. Ford says it will continue notifying owners monthly through various communication channels about the do-not-drive notice. This is the second do-not-drive advisory in connection to the Takata recalls from Ford and is meant to encourage owners to get their vehicles fixed. Ford drivers can determine if their vehicle is involved in the safety recall by visiting www.ford.com/support/recalls/ or nhtsa.gov/recalls. Mazda Motor Corp. also issued a warning for the 2004 to 2009 B-Series pickup, 2003 through 2013 Mazda 6, the 2006 and 2007 Speed6 and the 2004 through 2011 RX-8. Also included are the 2004 through 2006 MPV, the 2007 through 2012 CX-7 and the 2007 through 2015 CX-9. Ford, Mazda advise against Story by Reuters (Reuters) -Ford Motor and Mazda issued advisories to drivers of certain vehicles still affected by faulty Takata airbags and inflators that can cause potentially severe or fatal injuries. The National Highway Safety Administration has previously warned that air bag inflators could explode in impacted vehicles, sending potentially deadly sharp metal fragments flying and striking the driver or passengers. Ford has urged drivers with impacted vehicles to contact dealerships immediately for repairs. The recall includes specific models of vehicles such as Ranger trucks, Mustang and GT sports cars, Fusion sedans and some SUVs, including its popular Edge model, among others. The Detroit automaker said that roughly 765,600 airbag inflators in its vehicles, including about 374,300 in the U.S, continue to remain affected by the issue globally. Ford added that it continues contacting customers about these previously issued recalls, with more than 121 million outreach attempts in the United States. Mazda estimates that about 83,000 of its vehicles in the United States were affected, including models such as its CX-7 crossovers and RX8 sports cars. In July, BMW also recalled about 394,000 vehicles in the United States for the same issue. Since 2009, more than 30 deaths, including at least 26 in the United States, and hundreds of injuries have been attributed to Takata airbags installed in vehicles from various automakers. |
Ford sales flat with consumer Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales were 0.2% lower in July than the same month a year ago, as economic challenges affect consumer pocketbooks, despite freshened product. Across the industry, inventory levels are up, prompting additional incentives to move vehicles off lots, though interest rates continue to hurt affordability, and credit card debt is increasing among Americans. Cox Automotive Inc. was forecasting a 1.3% decrease in U.S. sales in the industry compared to July 2023 at an approximately 16 million seasonally adjusted annual rate. Ford sold 173,223 vehicles last month, and it claimed it was the top-selling brand in the country, estimating a 13.1% market share. New models of the refreshed F-150 pickup, new midsize Ranger truck, freshened Lincoln Nautilus, updated Ford Explorer and new Lincoln Aviator now are available. The company this week debuted a refreshed Ford Maverick small pickup for 2025, including a new Lobo street truck trim, set to launch before the end of the year. Gas- and diesel-powered vehicles that represent 86% of the Dearborn automaker's sales fell by 5% year-over-year. Hybrid sales rose 47%. Electric vehicle sales were up 31%. Truck sales rose 2.5% F-Series was up 0.7%, including a 61% increase in the hybrid model for which Ford has expanded production volumes. That also included F-150 Lightning sales rising 82%. Maverick sales in July increased by 70% over last year after its plant in Mexico added a third shift a year ago; that included a 65% increase of the hybrid version. Ranger sales rose 25%. Meanwhile, SUV sales dropped 6.8%. Explorer deliveries increased by 49%. Expedition was up 4.8%. Bronco sales fell 30%, while the smaller Bronco Sport was up 3.9%. Escape fell 16%, and Edge, whose production ended in the spring, was down 59%. Sales of all-electric Mustang Mach-E SUV were up 17%. Mustang coupe sales increased 160% from the same month last year. On the commercial van side, Transit sales fell 14%. That included a 4.7% gain for the electric E-Transit. Lincoln sales rose 14% year-over-year in July. Nautilus was up 27%, and Navigator rose 12%. Aviator was up 125%. Corsair fell by 4.3%. An outage at retail management software provider CDK Global Inc. following cyberattacks in June that affected thousands of dealerships across brands throughout North America affected a few of the earliest days of July, as well. General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV only report U.S. sales on a quarterly basis. Third-quarter deliveries will be shared in October. Among other automakers who report monthly, Honda Motor Co. Ltd.'s U.S. sales rose 8% year-over-year, Hyundai Motor Co.'s were up by 4%, Subaru Corp.'s increased 2.6% and Mazda Motor Corp.'s grew by 30%. Kia Corp.'s U.S. sales fell 10%. Despite some automakers posting increases, some economists are suggesting the Federal Reserve should cut interest rates. The Fed has said it's looking for the core personal consumption expenditures index to fall to 2% before it does that; it was at 2.6% in June. The average new auto loan interest rate in July was 9.72%, up more than 0.5 percentage points year-over-year. "Interest expense on credit cards appears to be crowding out spending on goods and services and is likely contributing to delinquencies and defaults on credit cards and auto loans," Jonathan Smoke, Cox's chief economist, wrote in a blog post earlier this week. The New York Fed reported U.S. credit card balances rose $129 billion in a year by the end of March — an amount that if not paid in full would require $20 billion a month just to cover interest costs. Auto delinquencies year-to-date are up to 0.26% in 2024 compared to 0.22% a year ago and are on track to be the worst since the Great Recession, according to Cox. "The consumer," Smoke wrote, "was in better shape a year ago, but with each passing month, capacity to spend has been reduced." |
UAW leader says Trump would Story by Tom Krisher DETROIT (AP) — Putting Vice President Kamala Harris at the top of the Democratic ticket increases the Democrats’ chance of winning Michigan and keeping the White House in November, the head of the United Auto Workers union says. In an interview Friday with The Associated Press, Shawn Fain said former President Donald Trump is beholden to billionaires, knows nothing about the auto industry and would send the labor movement into reverse if he's elected again. “Trump has never supported working class people. He has never supported unions," Fain said. "But he sure as hell was trying to pander for our votes now.” Fain has become a top nemesis of the Republican presidential nominee, who frequently rails against him at rallies and in speeches. Trump has called him an idiot, courting autoworkers' votes by saying Fain is putting their jobs at risk by embracing a move to electric vehicles. Although the UAW has members across the nation, many auto-making jobs are concentrated in the Great Lakers region and Michigan, a key swing state that could decide the presidential race in November. This week, the UAW endorsed Harris. Trump and Harris realize that increasing their share of union votes gives them a much better chance of taking Michigan, where the last two presidential elections have been close, said Marick Masters, a business professor emeritus at Wayne State University who follows labor issues. Trump won the state by just 11,000 votes in 2016 over Democrat Hillary Clinton, and then lost the state four years later by nearly 154,000 votes to President Joe Biden. Appealing to autoworkers helps to get votes from other union members, and union membership is high in the state at about 556,000, Masters said. That doesn't include thousands of family members and union retirees, he said. Any swing in those votes would be consequential in the race. During his acceptance speech at the Republican convention last month, Trump called on union workers to fire Fain, using false statements that Chinese auto companies are building factories in Mexico to ship vehicles to the U.S. without tariffs. Industry analysts say they aren't aware of any such plants under construction, at least not yet. “You probably have to get rid of this fool, this stupid idiot representing the United Auto Workers,” Trump said at a July 20 rally in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Trump claimed that he'll get 95% of the UAW vote because Fain is pushing electric vehicles. “They’re going to be made in China,” he said. He also pledged to bring the auto industry back from obliteration if he’s elected. But the industry is far from obliteration. Since Biden took office in January 2021, employment making cars and parts has grown 13.8% to just over 1 million people, according to the Labor Department. Detroit automakers General Motors, Ford and Stellantis have made billions in annual profits. Fain dismissed the insults as typical Trump behavior. “All the man does his name call, label people. He never has solutions,” Fain said. “That’s the problem in leadership. You need to find solutions.” The move from internal combustion vehicles to those powered by electricity is inevitable, Fain said, and union members need to be ready for it. During the transition, auto companies are still making gasoline vehicles and keeping factory workers employed, he said. Trump, he said, did nothing for autoworkers when General Motors closed its small-car assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio, in 2019. Biden, who last month announced he would drop out of the race and support Harris, helped to get GM to build an electric vehicle battery plant in the Lordstown area, replacing some of the lost jobs, Fain said. On Friday, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee said Harris has secured enough votes from delegates to become her party's nominee. Fain said he's confident that Harris will remain an advocate for working people, citing her trip to walk picket lines with striking GM workers in 2019. “She was there with the president through a lot of things we've been through,” he said. “She's been there for labor.” Of candidates to become Harris' vice presidential choice, the union prefers Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, followed by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Fain said. The union isn't backing Arizona Senator Mark Kelly because he has opposed a bill that would boost union organizing, and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro favors school vouchers, which would take send tax dollars to private schools and hurt public schools, Fain said. But even if Harris doesn't pick one of the union's favorites, the 370,000-member UAW would still put its political might behind her, Fain said. “I think she’s a brilliant woman. A very strong person," Fain said. “She understands the issues. I think Trump's just all talk. That's all he's ever been. He's a showman." In a statement, Trump's campaign called Fain “a puppet for the Democrat party" who isn't serving union laborers who are supporting Trump. “Shawn Fain’s empty words don’t matter — President Trump will take action to fight for the American auto worker,” the statement said. |
UAW endorses Kamala The Canadian Press UAW President Shawn Fain said in a statement that the union's “job” in this year's election was to defeat Trump. The union has more than a million active and retired members with a strong base in what the Democrats call the “blue wall” states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. “We can put a billionaire back in office who stands against everything our union stands for, or we can elect Kamala Harris who will stand shoulder to shoulder with us in our war on corporate greed,” Fain said. There was never any doubt that the UAW would endorse Harris after President Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race. Biden won the UAW's backing in January, and accepted it with a speech at a union political convention in Washington. The AFL-CIO, the umbrella labor organization that includes the UAW, had already endorsed the vice president. Fain needed to wait for the union's executive board to give the nod to Harris, but has repeatedly attacked Trump ahead of the endorsement. “There is only one answer to the threat we face as a nation, and it's not another billionaire in office,” Fain wrote in a UAW post early Wednesday on the X social media site. Fain and the union also have called Trump a “scab," a derogatory term for workers who cross union picket lines and work during a strike. They also have said he did nothing for workers in Ohio when General Motors closed a factory in 2019. The UAW endorsed Biden’s reelection bid in January, just a few months after the Democratic president joined striking General Motors workers on the picket lines near Detroit. The union won big raises last fall after limited strikes at all three Detroit automakers. Shortly after the Biden endorsement, Fain was making multiple television appearances on Biden's behalf. But those waned as the UAW ramped up its campaign to organize nonunion auto factories and a spat with a court-appointed union monitor. The UAW says its union members and retirees typically lean toward Democrats, but a sizeable number support the GOP. That’s consistent with AP VoteCast, which found that 56% of union members and households backed Biden in 2020, while 42% backed Trump. Still, Trump has courted union members, saying when he accepted the Republican nomination that he would rescue the auto industry from what he called “complete obliteration.” He also called for members to fire Fain, using false claims that Fain allowed Chinese automakers to build auto factories across the border in Mexico to ship electric vehicles to the U.S. without tariffs. Industry analysts know of no such factories under construction. The auto industry is currently far from obliteration. Detroit auto companies are still making billions and auto manufacturing employment is up 13.8% since Biden took office. Trump said he would put tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles. Biden earlier this year slapped tariffs on Chinese imported goods, including EVs. The 1.3 million-member Teamsters union, whose president spoke at the Republican National Convention, has yet to make an endorsement in the race. |
Trump vows to end electric Ari Natter Former President Donald Trump used his nomination speech to take aim at President Joe Biden’s electric vehicle policies, vowing to action against them on his first day in office. “I will C on day one,” Trump said in his address at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. The move would result in “saving the U.S. auto industry from complete obliteration, which is happening right now, and saving U.S. customers thousands and thousands of dollars per car,” he said. While the Biden administration doesn’t have a mandate on electric vehicles, critics of new air-pollution limits issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in March have said they would force automakers to sell EVs. Trump has repeatedly vowed to repeal what he calls Biden’s “EV mandate,” referring to a new EPA regulation limiting tailpipe pollution that is so strict it would compel automakers to sell far more electric and hybrid models over time. Although automakers have a choice in how they comply with the pollution limits, they’re expected to meet them by selling more lower-emission hybrids and zero-emission EVs. Under one scenario modeled by the EPA, about 56% of sales of new cars and light trucks in 2032 would be electric and an additional 16% would be hybrids. Trump’s remarks on EVs came just moments before he criticized what he said was trillions of dollars of wasteful spending “having to do with the green new scam.” He said he would instead direct the money to projects like roads, bridges and dams, though it wasn’t immediately clear how he would make good on the pledge. Trump has made no secret his disdain for electric vehicles, claiming they don’t work and will benefit China and Mexico while hurting American autoworkers. Biden, in contrast, has made the shift to battery-powered cars one of his top climate and industrial policies and has set a goal of having 50% of all new vehicle sales be electric by 2030. |
Donald Trump uses convention Craig Mauger Milwaukee — Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump used the spotlight of his party's national convention on Thursday night to call for the firing of the leader of the United Auto Workers, escalating his ongoing feud with Shawn Fain, whose union labeled Trump a "scab." Trump made his comment after saying China was building auto plants across the southern border in Mexico and planning to sell Mexican-assembled vehicles into the United States. "The United Auto Workers ought to be ashamed for allowing this to happen," Trump then said. "And the leader of the United Auto Workers should be fired immediately. And every single auto worker, union and non-union, should be voting for Donald Trump." The "should be fired" comment wasn't in excerpts of Trump's prepared remarks provided by Trump's campaign to reporters ahead of the speech. The United Auto Workers, which is headquartered in Detroit, endorsed Democratic President Joe Biden's reelection in January. “This November, we can stand up and elect someone who wants to stand with us and support our cause. Or we can elect someone who will divide us and fight us every step of the way,” Fain said at the time. “That’s what this choice is about. The question is, who do we want in that office to give us the best shot of winning, of organizing, of negotiating strong contracts, of uniting the working class and winning our fair share once again, as our union has done so many times in our nation’s history. "We need to know who’s going to sit in the most powerful seat in the world and help us win as a united working class.” The UAW's social media account labeled Trump "a scab and a billionaire" in a post on X. In the labor movement, a scab is a derogatory term for a strikebreaker or someone who crosses a picket line during a strike. "We know which side we're on. Not his," the union said. In a statement on Friday, Fain said Trump doesn’t want to protect American autoworkers but wants to "pad the pockets of the ludicrously wealthy auto executives." The threat that auto workers face is corporate greed run wild, Fain said. "America’s autoworkers aren’t the problem," Fain added. "Our union isn’t the problem. The working class isn’t the problem. Corporate greed and the billionaires’ hero, mascot and lapdog Donald Trump, are the problem." Fain scored victories for his union last year in a round of high-stakes negotiations with Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV. In April, the UAW won a union organizing election at Volkswagen AG's plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., a breakthrough for the union into a foreign-owned assembly plant in the South. A court-appointed monitor has been investigating allegations that Fain and his team demanded a subordinate take action to benefit his fiancée and her sister, according to a court filing. Fain has not addressed the allegations directly. Biden's administration has supported policies to promote electric vehicles and to boost the manufacturing of batteries and other parts needed for them in the U.S. In April last year, the administration released the "strongest ever" tailpipe emissions standards that were expected to push automakers to accelerate the proportion of electric vehicles. As he has repeatedly in the past, Trump vowed in Thursday's night speech to end electric vehicle mandates if he's elected in November. He contended the move would save "the U.S. auto industry from complete obliteration." Biden's supporters have contended that supporting the transition to electric vehicles is required to ensure the U.S. plays a dominant role in the future of the auto industry. Also, on Thursday, Trump said he would impose tariffs of 100% and 200% on cars being built by Chinese companies in Mexico. "They will be un-sellable in the United States," he told the crowd. So far, the number of jobs in vehicle and parts manufacturing in Michigan has held relatively steady during Biden's term in the White House, decreasing by less than 1% to about 165,000 jobs in May, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. During Trump's four-year term, the number of jobs in vehicle and parts manufacturing in Michigan fell by 5% to about 166,000, according to the bureau's tracking. |
Ford to add Super Duty truck Breana Noble A Ford Motor Co. plant in Canada will produce F-Series Super Duty trucks starting in 2026, and the Dearborn automaker will move the launch of an all-electric three-row SUV to another unspecified plant after delaying the program there. Ford is investing $3 billion to add initial annual capacity for 100,000 F-Series Super Duty trucks at Oakville Assembly Complex in Ontario outside Toronto in response to demand from its Ford Pro commercial business, retaining 1,800 jobs there. The plant will produce diesel and gas-powered trucks and will support next-generation multi-energy technology. Super Duty production at Kentucky Truck Assembly Plant and Ohio Assembly Plant are running at full capacity with 200,000 vehicles produced in the first half of the year, the company said. “Super Duty is a vital tool for businesses and people around the world and, even with our Kentucky Truck Plant and Ohio Assembly Plant running flat out, we can’t meet the demand. This move benefits our customers and supercharges our Ford Pro commercial business,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a statement. “At the same time, we look forward to introducing three-row electric utility vehicles, leveraging our experience in three-row utility vehicles and our learnings as America’s No. 2 electric vehicle brand to deliver fantastic, profitable vehicles.” Ford has been the only one of the Detroit Three to produce all of its full-size trucks in the United States. The United Auto Workers last fall opted to strike Kentucky Truck, its most profitable plant that produces Super Duties and full-size SUVs, as the first full-size truck plant to be hit with a walkout. Following that, Ford CEO Jim Farley earlier this year said Ford had to "think carefully about our (manufacturing) footprint." The investment includes $2.3 billion to install assembly and integrated stamping operations at Oakville. It will secure approximately 1,800 jobs at Oakville, 400 more than initially would have been needed to produce the three-row electric SUV. It'll also add about 150 jobs at Windsor Engine Complex to manufacture more V-8 engines. It'll add roughly 70 jobs and additional overtime at U.S. component plants. There will be $24 million going into Sharonville Transmission Plant in Ohio and additional overtime. Rawsonville Components Plant in Michigan will receive $1 million and roughly 20 new jobs. Sterling Axle Plant in Michigan will add about 50 new jobs. Employees represented by Canadian labor union Unifor at Oakville will return a year ahead of what was expected with the delay in the three-row SUV program. “This investment will benefit Ford, our employees in Canada and the U.S., and especially our customers who want and need Super Duty for their lives and livelihoods,” Kumar Galhotra, Ford’s chief operating officer, said in a statement. “It is fully consistent with our Ford+ plan for profitable growth, as we take steps to maximize our global manufacturing footprint, and our investments will have a fast payback.” Ford to start producing F-series Nick Westoll Ford Motor Company officials have announced that the Oakville assembly plant will start producing F-series Super Duty pickup trucks. In a statement shared Thursday morning, it was announced production was expected to begin in the summer of 2026. To help with production, there will be a $2.3-billion investment to install assembly and integrated stamping operations. Initial production will focus on conventional models, but plans are underway to build electric models later in the decade. Plants in Kentucky and Ohio will also see investments to help build the pickup trucks, which Ford executives said are among the company’s most profitable vehicles. The Ford statement said production of the pickup trucks would increase by up to 100,000 units. News of the investment came just a few months after the company executives announced electric vehicle production in Oakville would be delayed until 2027. Unifor, the union representing assembly plant workers in Oakville, said it would have meant a three-year layoff. Lana Payne, the president of Unifor, said the delayed production was “too long, too disruptive, and too harmful to accept” and the announcement helps address the union’s concerns. “Since the delay was announced in April 2024, Unifor has been engaged in negotiations with the company to push for additional support mechanisms for workers and an accelerated resumption of production at Oakville,” a Unifor statement issued Thursday morning said. Ford executives said in April the delay was needed for electric vehicle technology development. |
Ford considers $400M Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. is considering a $400 million investment for a component manufacturing facility in Kentucky to support production of electric vehicles. Ray Leathers, CEO of the Shelby County Industrial & Development Foundation, said Friday that the Dearborn automaker is in the final stages of making the commitment for a facility to support a unicast aluminum forming process in the county that's adjacent to Jackson County, home of Louisville where Ford has two plants producing trucks and SUVs. Although affordability challenges and range anxiety has made EV adoption a bumpier road than expected, Ford's contract with the United Auto Workers calls for a $1.2 billion investment for a new EV in Louisville Assembly. The sites under consideration also are roughly 70 miles northeast of Glendale, Kentucky, where Ford is building two battery plants with Korean partner SK On Ltd. The first is set to begin production next year. The second was supposed to open in 2026 but has been delayed as part of $12 billion in cuts and delays for EV investments due to the slower-than-expected uptake in sales. "It's not a done deal," Leathers said about the parts plant. "They still have a couple of hoops to get through, but we're just very proud that we've been working with Ford for about six to nine months on this project." The Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development in May approved $11 million in tax incentives for the project that is expected to create 260 jobs in the county where more than 14,000 people leave daily to go to work, Leathers said. Average hourly wage target listed for the project is $36 per hour. "We thank the Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development for its offer of support as we explore the potential for a specialized high-tech facility in Shelby County," Ford spokesperson Jessica Enoch said in a statement. Crystal Staley, director of communications for Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, declined in a statement to comment on specific prospects but said: "Ford has been an amazing Team Kentucky partner" and that "the Governor does want Kentuckians to know there is a lot to be excited about when it comes to the state’s future economic growth." The plant is expected to occupy around 500,000 square feet, Leathers said. A couple of new buildings in Shelbyville off Interstate 64 are options and more than 12 million square feet of industrial space is coming online soon in the county. "Shelby County enjoys a very strategic location in the U.S.," Leathers said. "We're right at the crossroads of America. I think Shelby County is a great strategic location for Ford." |
UAW President Shawn Fain BY TREY HAWKINS Just last month, GM Authority reported that UAW President Shawn Fain was under investigation by a Federal Monitor for allegations of retaliation against other union leaders. Now, Monitor Neil Barofsky has revealed new details regarding his investigation into Fain, which includes demanding benefits for his fiancée and her sister. According to a report from Automotive News, multiple parties are claiming that Shawn Fain retaliated against them, including Vice President Rich Boyer. In a statement, Boyer alleged that Fain retaliated “for my refusal to accede to demands by Brother Fain and his agents that I take actions involving the Stellantis assignment that would have benefited Brother Fain’s domestic partner and her sister.” In addition, Boyer claims that he was removed for his “refusal to demote one UAW member assigned to my staff, and to terminate the UAW employment of another such UAW member.” “It is not a personal decision,” Fain wrote in a prepared statement explaining his decisions. “Vice President Boyer and I are friends. In the old UAW, that would have meant he and I decide to not rock the boat, and if that means the members fall a little bit further behind, so be it. In the new UAW, it means we step in and take corrective action when needed.” It’s worth noting that Fain is engaged to Keesha McConaghie, a financial analyst at the UAW-Chrysler National Training Center. Interestingly, Federal Monitor Neil Barofsky also released more information regarding a separate investigate involving an unidentified regional director. More specifically, he received allegations that said regional director “embezzled funds by using their UAW corporate credit card for personal purchases and misappropriating union property.” As of the time of this writing, Barofsky is waiting on the UAW to provide more documents related to this issue. Notably, the union has produced more than 70,000 documents thus far. |
Foreign carmakers Luke Ramseth Foreign-owned manufacturers built more vehicles in the United States last year than their rivals in Detroit, a first for the market that underscores major shifts in domestic auto production. Non-U.S. automakers including Toyota Motor Corp. and Mercedes-Benz Group AG built more than 4.9 million cars in 2023, a jump of about 500,000 from the prior year, according to a report Tuesday from Autos Drive America and the American International Automobile Dealers Association. The Detroit Three — General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and the former Fiat Chrysler, Stellantis NV — assembled 4.6 million in the market, a modest decline of about 150,000 vehicles from 2022. Separately, U.S. electric-vehicle makers Tesla Inc., Rivian Automotive Inc. and Lucid Group Inc. produced 754,342 cars in the United States in the same period, according to the auto groups, which lobby for international car companies and their dealers. The production shift “makes clear that international automakers are driving economic growth throughout the country,” Jennifer Safavian, chief executive officer of Autos Drive America, said in a statement. International automakers have increased their United States production by more than 85% over the past 25 years, the report said, going from about 2.4 million to 4.9 million. Meanwhile, the Detroit Three's domestic production has dropped by about half in that period as foreign-owned brands claimed larger shares of the rich U.S. market. Much of that Detroit Three production has headed elsewhere, including Mexico, Canada and China. Foreign automakers now build vehicles across nine states. And they have either auto plants, component plants, and battery plants across 13 states. Almost all are in the South, with the major exceptions being Ohio and Indiana. The report's figures are "confirmation of the difficulty that the Big Three are having," said Marick Masters, a professor emeritus of business at Wayne State University — including as they try to keep up amid the electric vehicle transition both domestically and in international markets. Foreign automakers, meanwhile, have been aggressive in recent years expanding their U.S. manufacturing footprints. The growing production disparity between Detroit Three and foreign-owned vehicle production also underscores the necessity for the United Auto Workers to organize non-Detroit Three auto plants, a campaign that has been unfolding in recent months. The Detroit union has been pushing to organize more foreign-owned plants, achieving success on its third try at a Volkswagen plant in Tennessee. But the UAW failed in a unionization vote in May at a Mercedes production complex in Alabama. The union has pledged to continue on and try to organize more foreign plants as well as domestic EV producers like Tesla. The campaign to organize foreign automakers has "existential dimensions" for the UAW, Masters said: "As the position of the Detroit Three shrinks, the bargaining power of the UAW falls commensurately in the U.S." Sam Fiorani, AutoForecast’s vice president of global vehicle forecasting, said while 2023 was the first time the traditional Detroit Three was surpassed in production by foreign transplant automakers, another notable milestone came five years ago. That was when the Detroit Three fell to less than half the overall U.S. production market for the first time, making fewer cars, trucks and SUVs domestically than foreign and other U.S. automakers like Tesla combined. In a statement, Ford said its manufacturing in the United States has remained robust. It pointed to figures showing it has consistently led other automakers in U.S. production volume in recent years, including assembling about 1.8 million vehicles domestically in both 2022 and 2023. "The real story is that year after year, Ford leads all automakers by a wide margin when it comes to producing vehicles in America with American workers," the automaker said in a statement sent by spokesperson Jess Enoch. "We expect to continue that legacy in 2024." Spokespeople for Stellantis and GM did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the report. |
UAW President Shawn Fain DeJanay Booth-Singleton (CBS DETROIT) - United Auto Workers union President Shawn Fain and other union leaders are under investigation by a federal court-appointed monitor, according to a court filing. According to a 32-page status report filed on Monday, Fain is being investigated for allegations that the union has not been cooperating with the monitor, Neil Barofsky, in providing requested documents and that Fain retaliated against the UAW secretary-treasurer for her refusal to authorize "certain expenditures of funds at the request of and/or for the benefit of those in the President's Office." In the report, Barofsky wrote that members of the International Executive Board (IEB) passed a motion allowing Fain to withdraw assignments from the secretary-treasurer following allegations of misconduct. The report also stated that Barofksy is investigating Fain's removal of one of the union's vice presidents from oversight of the Stellantis Department in May 2024. The vice president claimed that Fain retaliated against him for "refusing to engage in acts of financial misconduct to benefit others." In an unrelated investigation, Barofsky received allegations that a regional director was involved in possible embezzlement. Fain issued the following statement: "Taking our union in a new direction means sometimes you have to rock the boat, and that upsets some people who want to keep the status quo, but our membership expects better and deserves better than the old business as usual. We encourage the Monitor to investigate whatever claims are brought to their office, because we know what they'll find: a UAW leadership committed to serving the membership, and running a democratic union. We're staying focused on winning record contracts, growing our union, and fighting for economic and social justice on and off the job." Barofsky was appointed in 2021 to investigate the union related to bribery and embezzlement, resulting in convictions of former UAW leaders. The report stated that the union was cooperating shortly after Barofsky's third report in July 2022, which concluded that UAW was concealing information. However, in February 2024, he started investigating executive members, including Fain, the secretary-treasurer, and one of the union's regional directors, after UAW's level of cooperation started to "erode." Around that time, the union submitted about 2,600 of the 116,000 requested documents. More than 80% of the documents submitted were given days before the latest report was issued on June 6. "Although the Union has cooperated in making UAW employees and senior leaders available to be interviewed by the Monitor's investigative team, the Union has not cooperated in producing documents that are relevant to the investigation in a complete and timely manner, instead requiring the Monitor to conduct those interviews without the benefit of the full production of potentially relevant and contemporaneous documents," Barofsky wrote in the report. The report cited a consent decree, which states that the monitor has full access to the requested documents and has the authority to remove "fraud, corruption, illegal behavior, dishonesty, and unethical practices from the UAW and its constituent entities." UAW argued that it could withhold documents due to privilege; however, Barofsky said that only pertains to when he attends board meetings, which he does as an observer. |
Cyberattacks force ‘hundreds’ Sean Previl If you’re hoping to purchase a new car in North America this week, you may be in for a bit longer of a process after back-to-back cyberattacks hit CDK Global, which provides software for thousands of auto dealerships, forcing many to look at alternative methods. The company said the attacks led to an outage that is still impacting its operations, and by relation, the work of dealers across Canada and the U.S. Tim Reuss, president and CEO of the Canadian Automobile Dealers Association, told Global News in an interview that the outage by CDK had impacted “hundreds” of dealerships in Canada. “We’re talking hundreds of dealerships across Canada and they have all brands under the sun,” he said. Stellantis, which has dealerships in Canada and the U.S., told Global News many of its dealerships have switched to manual processes to help customers — including with pen and paper. “The CDK situation continues to evolve. Our dealerships remain open at this time, and we continue to monitor it closely with CDK as they work to resolve this issue,” a spokesperson for Stellantis said in an email. Group 1 Automotive, which owns and operates 202 auto dealerships, 264 franchises and 32 collision centres in the U.S. and U.K., said in a news release on Monday that its business applications and processes at its American operations were impacted. It said that when the issue arose, it activated its cyber incident response procedures to protect and isolate its systems from CDK’s platform, and has been using “alternative processes” to conduct business until CDK’s systems are available again. It added dealerships in the U.K. don’t use CDK systems, so those have not been impacted. What is CDK Global? CDK is considered a major player in the auto sales industry and provides software to dealers which help with operations like facilitating vehicle sales, as well as financing, insurance and repairs. More than 15,000 retail locations are serviced by CDK Global in North America. Where does restoration stand? Restoration is still slow-going, with the company having shut down all of its systems “proactively” when the attacks occurred. In an update over the weekend, spokesperson Lisa Finney told the Associated Press it had begun the restoration process. However, she said consumers should anticipate the process to take several days and the company would engage with customers to provide alternative ways to conduct business. She also said it is working with third-party experts to investigate the incident and had notified law enforcement. Dealerships have been warned, however, to be cautious of any attempted phishing as “bad actors” posing as CDK could try to obtain system access. Global News has reached out to CDK Global for comment but has not yet received a response. Are sales still happening? Ford also confirmed to Global News on Monday that the CDK outage had impacted some of its dealers, but that sales operations continue. Asbury Automotive Group in the U.S. said in a statement it too was affected by the attack, with sales, service and inventory functions impacted. For some like Plaza Ford general manager Katie Walls Gugliota in Baltimore, working without the CDK systems has left paperwork to build. After the second cyberattack, she said the company decided to shut down business until systems are back up and running. “This is a first for us, so this is uncharted territory,” she told CBS News’ Baltimore last Thursday. “We are completely dead in the water.” It’s not yet known how long the impact of the outage will last, with no date for full restoration. Yet some cybersecurity experts have cautioned that consumers connected to CDK should assume their data may have been breached and to monitor credit and be wary of phishing campaigns. Reuss said it will be pressing CDK for more transparency and if any customer data was impacted from the cyberattacks. He added, based on what the CADA and its members have received, restoration is likely to be a “matter of days,” yet he added that even once that is done, it would still take longer for dealerships affected. “All of the things that they’re doing in other ways currently, pen and paper, other systems, et cetera, it then needs to be put back into their central systems and then reconciled with their reality,” he said. “So there’s going to be a bit of a hangover for this one for quite some time.” |
Ford manages Q2 sales increase Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose less than 1% year-over-year in the second quarter, propelled by growth in sales of trucks as well as vehicles with alternative powertrains even as cyberattacks disrupted dealership operations at the tail end of the quarter. Sales increased 0.8% to 536,050 in the April-to-June period, the Dearborn automaker said Wednesday. A 4.5% increase in truck sales reflects a lineup that includes the refreshed F-150 and new Ranger midsize pickup. Meanwhile, electric vehicle sales rose 61% and hybrid sales were up almost 56% to a quarterly record, while the bulk — 85% — of Ford's sales that are in gas- and diesel-powered vehicles fell 5%. Even as vehicle pricing somewhat retreats and automakers up incentives, high interest rates have made financing a new vehicle a challenge for some customers, and political uncertainty heading into the presidential election also may be contributing to hesitancy. Meanwhile, two cyberattacks on digital management system provider CDK Global Inc., which supports thousands of dealers across the country — including some of Ford's — disrupted operations. Some dealers took to doing sales on pen and paper, ran documents to the secretary of state by hand and were unable to access vehicle service histories and appointment logs. CDK says its management system should be back up for dealers by Thursday. Expected to boost Ford sales in the latter half of the year is the refreshed Ford Explorer SUV that will begin shipping to dealers soon. That'll be followed by the new Lincoln Aviator SUV, Mustang Mach-E Rally SUV and extended-range E-Transit commercial van. F-Series truck sales were down 6.1% in the second quarter from last year. The all-electric F-150 Lightning was up 77%, representing 4% of F-Series sales. Hybrid models had their best quarter and represented 20% of the non-EV deliveries. Ranger sales rose 5.1%. Maverick compact truck sales were up 81%; its hybrid model had its best quarter yet. Transit commercial van sales rose 32%, contributing to a first-half sales record. E-Transit sales represented 8% of those sales and gained 96%, the vehicle's best quarter since debuting in 2022. Ford also highlighted consumer adoption of its Ford Pro Intelligence software platform with 600,000 subscribers at the end of the quarter, up about 33% from last year. SUV sales fell 5.3%, though with sales in the segment up 5.3% in the first half of 2024, it still makes a best first half for them. In the second quarter, sales of the Expedition rose 8.7%, the Explorer and Bronco were flat, the Bronco Sport fell 15% and the Escape dropped by 13%. Mustang Mach-E SUV sales increased 46%. Ford has been looking at ways to encourage EV sales. Last week, it notified employees and retirees under its management lease program that it was offering for model year 2025 the opportunity for participants to lease an additional vehicle from the base program if it's a Mach-E or Lightning. Sales of the Mustang coupe were up 27%. Luxury brand Lincoln SUV deliveries rose 19% in the second quarter. Aviator sales grew by 90%. The new Nautilus captured a 20% increase. Corsair was up 17%, though Navigator fell 27%. Despite the disruptions at dealers on the service side because of the cyberattacks, Ford emphasized there was a 175% increase in remote service jobs by dealers during the first half of the year. Ford's sales trend was better than those of its crosstown rivals. General Motors Co.'s saw a 0.6% increase in deliveries. Stellantis NV's fell by a whopping 21%. Foreign automakers Toyota Motor Corp., Honda Motor Co., Hyundai Motor Corp., Subaru Corp., Mazda Motor Corp., BMW AG and Volkswagen AG all reported quarterly U.S. sales increases. Kia Corp., Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. and Mitsubishi Motors Corp. posted slight declines, as did Texas-based Tesla Inc. for its global sales. |
Ford CEO: EV adoption Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley took to LinkedIn on Friday to emphasize politics and policy won't be what turns the United States to electric vehicles — ensuring they are desirable and accessible will. "The tipping point we’re working toward will come not from regulators who push us or from politicians who try to hold us back," Farley said in a post titled "Confessions from a lifelong Petrol Head. I love electric vehicles and it has nothing to do with politics" that was shared hours after President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump took to the stage for their first debate of the election season. Farley continued that the tipping point "will come from consumers. Not when an arbitrary market share is reached, but when electric vehicles are simply better for more customers — better to drive, cheaper to own, and easier to integrate into daily life. This is the reality for millions already." The role of the government in the EV transition is a major difference between policies espoused by the presumed major-party candidates for president, contributing to the politicization of EV ownership. The Biden administration as a part of its environmental initiatives has finalized the most stringent tailpipe emissions reduction standards to date, approved funding for charging infrastructure and rolled out incentives for the manufacturing of EVs and their parts in the United States here, while reforming requirements around tax credits for consumer purchases of plug-in models. Meanwhile, Trump has promised to roll back regulations as he did during his previous administration. He has said many Americans don't want EVs, arguing they are too expensive and less reliable than gas-powered vehicles because of their range, charging speeds and performance in varying weather conditions. As a result, he has suggested American manufacturing could be put at risk. Ahead of his appearance Friday at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado, Farley in his post recognized that the Dearborn automaker is losing money on its early EV models "largely due to the upfront investment costs." Ford is predicting its Model e EV division will lose up to $5.5 billion in 2024. Executives have said the company's next generation of EVs will be cheaper to build. "We are in a global race to compete in a future where electric propulsion will undoubtedly be a giant force in transportation," the CEO wrote. "America cannot cede innovation leadership to China, Europe, or any other region." Although Ford has said it's moving forward with a portfolio of gas-powered and hybrid vehicles in addition to EVs, Farley highlighted his own experience with his F-150 Lightning Platinum. He discussed that almost all drives Americans take are within the range of Ford's EVs and noted the declining prices of EVs, the cost savings from fuel and maintenance, and the loyalty rates of EV buyers. "For me, and for millions of Americans," he wrote, "electric vehicles are removing daily hassles and reminding us why we love to drive.
|
Ford recalls over 550,000 pickup Tom Krisher Detroit – Ford is recalling more than 550,000 pickup trucks in the U.S. because the transmissions can unexpectedly downshift to first gear no matter how fast the trucks are going. The recall covers certain F-150 pickups from the 2014 model year. Ford's F-Series pickups are the top-selling vehicles in the U.S. Ford says in documents posted Tuesday by U.S. safety regulators that the downshifting can cause drivers to lose control of the trucks, increasing the risk of a crash. The recalls come after U.S. auto safety regulators in March began investigating complaints that more than 540,000 Ford pickup trucks from 2014 can abruptly downshift to a lower gear and increase the risk of a crash. Documents say the problem is caused by a lost signal between a transmission speed sensor and the powertrain control computer. There also could be corrosion and problems with connector pins. Dealers will update the powertrain control software at no cost to owners, who will be notified by letters in early July. In a statement Tuesday, Ford said it expects repairs to be available in the third quarter of this year. Owners will be able to use mobile service or pickup and delivery at participating dealers. Ford says in documents posted Tuesday by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it has 396 warranty and field reports and 124 customer complaints about the problem, covering 482 trucks. The Dearborn, Michigan, automaker says it knows of 130 complaints to the government, with 52 alleging that rear wheels locked up or that drivers lost control of the trucks. Two of the complainants reported injuries and one reported a crash that could have been caused by the problem, Ford said. Ford's statement said that before the trucks downshift, drivers could see a malfunction indicator light on the dashboard. In some cases, signals can be restored while the trucks are moving, and they can be driven normally. In other cases drivers may need to stop and restart the engine to get the transmissions to work properly. The company says it expects fewer than 1% of the recalled vehicles to have the problem. NHTSA said it started its investigation in March after getting complaints about sudden downshifts in the trucks’ automatic transmissions. The agency is looking into whether those trucks should have been included in previous recalls for the problem. Ford started recalling trucks and other vehicles from the 2011 and 2012 model years in 2016, and added two recalls in 2019 covering pickups from the 2011 to 2013 model years. The recalls covered about 1.5 million vehicles. The company said it’s working with NHTSA to support the investigation.
|
Ford Sacrifices Short-Term Keith Naughton, Bloomberg News (Bloomberg) -- Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley is so fed up with being the most recalled automaker in America that he’s willing to lose money to fix what’s ballooned into a $4.8 billion a year problem. For the foreseeable future, Farley says, the company will hold newly redesigned models for up to six weeks to perform extra quality checks that go beyond the extensive tests Ford undertakes in its factories. Over time, the automaker hopes to reduce warranty reserves that have more than doubled in five years. In the short term, however, it means Ford will take a revenue hit by not immediately shipping models to dealers. “Our earnings may be a little lumpy,” Farley told analysts on Ford’s first quarter earnings call in April. “What we’re going to see long term is fewer recalls and lower warranty costs because of this new process.” Earlier this year, Farley pioneered this “build-and-hold” approach with the newly redesigned F-150 pickup — Ford’s best-selling vehicle. More than 60,0000 fully built F-150s sat in parking lots around Detroit for weeks so engineers could check them for quality problems. Ford reported a 65% decline in earnings before interest and taxes in its internal combustion engine unit while holding one of its most profitable models. But the extra quality checks also allowed the automaker to avoid 12 recalls, Farley said, including software glitches and assembly problems. Now, Farley is holding another marquee model, a redesigned version of the Explorer sport-utility vehicle, for extra tests. He plans a similar approach later this year with updated editions of the Bronco Sport compact SUV and hot-selling Maverick small pickup. Quality challenges have afflicted Ford throughout its history, but it has become a crisis in recent years. The company is recalling more cars and spending more to fix them.
Last year, Ford set aside $1,203 for warranty repairs on each vehicle it sold, up from $591 in 2019, according to Warranty Week magazine, which tracks corporate repair expenses. In total, the automaker spent $4.8 billion last year fixing its customers’ cars, or about 4% of automotive revenue — a rate roughly three times the industry. In general, automakers are issuing more recalls. The increased complexity of advanced electronics and a greater proclivity toward preempting potential problems have led to a 42% jump in vehicle recalls from 2013 to 2023, according to the latest data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Still, Ford’s annual recalls have soared past competitors: It’s had the distinction of being the most recalled automaker in the US since 2020. “It’s frustrating to investors not to see the problem go away,” David Whiston, auto analyst with Chicago-based Morningstar Inc., said. “At a minimum, you’d like to see Ford on parity with GM and striving to be on parity with Toyota, the industry gold standard. But there’s a long way to go.” The company said that it has seen a 10% improvement on quality in 2024 models, based on internal measurements. Its defect rate for its latest launches has fallen to 20%, which Ford says is in line with the industry average. Independent studies show Ford is still ranks below average among its peers. “We are somewhere in the middle of the pack and obviously we’re not happy with being in the middle of the pack,” Kumar Galhotra, Ford’s chief operating officer, said in an interview. “The goal is to move very rapidly to catch Toyota.” Toyota Envy Farley, who spent the first two decades of his career at Toyota Motor Corp., has been sounding the alarm on Ford’s flagging quality since he became CEO in October 2020. Ford “needed a much more fundamental reset than I had realized,” the CEO told investors at the Wolfe Research Global Auto Conference in February. He added: “We all have regrets and that’s a big one for me. It’s a humbling thing.” In addition to more rigorous testing, the company has reworked executive compensation so salaried staff don’t get their full bonus without hitting quality targets. Stubborn quality problems have dogged several recent additions to Ford’s line-up. High-profile snafus include a battery-connector flaw in the electric Mustang Mach-e crossover that caused some to lose power, engine failures in the cash-cow Bronco SUV and the risk of engine fires in the otherwise well-received Maverick hybrid pickup. “Launches have been very problematic for Ford,” Frank Hanley, senior director overseeing JD Power’s initial quality survey, said in an interview. “They do recoup and fix those problems over time,” he said, but “then the next launch would come and the vehicle would suffer again.” Before Ford started holding new vehicles for extra quality checks, the CEO told investors in April that it saw a 70% increase in flaws when it launched new models. The carmaker’s growing line of electric vehicles tend also to be among the most feature laden models, which often means more glitches. Ford further complicates matters by rushing to market nascent advanced technologies, such as its hands-free driving system BlueCruise, ahead of Asian rivals. Columbus, Ohio, Ford dealer Rhett Ricart said he complained to Farley about the automaker's growing recalls five years ago, before the Ford executive had become CEO. Ricart was fed up with receiving new cars from Ford filled with flaws that would then sit on his lot, awaiting repair parts, leaving him unable to sell it until his mechanics fixed it. While the current approach means waiting longer for new models, Ricart thinks it’s an improvement. “In the old days they would have delivered them, but now they're saying, ‘No, we're going to fix ‘em first before we get ‘em to you,’” Ricart said. “Ford’s got it right now.” That troubleshooting of the F-150, for example, uncovered one defect involving a wiring harness — a sheath full of important electrical wires — that was being improperly installed behind the dashboard instrument panel. That caused the harness to rub against a metal bracket that would have led to a rupture in the wiring and could have caused the instrument gauge screen to go blank. Engineers fixed it before it went to dealer lots, avoiding a lengthy repair process. Overall, The F-150 launch this year has resulted in fewer defects than last year's rollout of the Super Duty, Farley said in April, without offering specifics. Ultimately, though, fixing cars after they’re already built — and taking a hit to earnings while they sit in holding lots — is not an ideal solution, nor is it how the highest quality automakers operate, automotive experts say. Ford needs to address issues farther upstream in how it designs and engineers its models if it wants to be in the same league with Toyota. “They’ve got to get to a point where they aren’t having to take drastic actions to avoid being the most recalled,” said Karl Brauer, executive analyst for researcher iSeeCars. “They’ve got to do better.” |
Court awards $57M payout Breana Noble A federal court this spring directed Ford Motor Co. to pay almost $57 million after a jury found the Dearborn automaker responsible for injuries from a 1998 Expedition SUV that backed over her left leg. The company is challenging the verdict, whose assigned damages would put it among some of the largest personal injury payouts in U.S. history. The case almost never made it to trial. Lorelle Thompson in 2016 sustained fractures to her tibia and fibula bones after exiting her vehicle to go to her mailbox. Thompson slipped as she stepped out, her left leg falling behind the driver's-side front wheel when her parked Expedition "self-shifted into powered reverse and began to roll backwards," according to the complaint that was originally filed in 2018. The vehicle crushed her left leg, requiring surgeries, physical therapy and temporary uses of a wheelchair and walker. Thompson, according to the complaint, now frequently uses a cane, has a limp and experiences pain in her leg. An eight-member jury in the trial overseen by U.S. Colorado District Court Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell determined Ford was liable for and negligent with a design defect in the vehicle. It awarded Thompson $56.575 million, including $45 million in punitive damages. "While our sympathies go out to Ms. Thompson and we respect the jury’s decision, we do not believe the verdict is supported by the evidence," according to a statement sent by spokesperson Richard Binhammer. "We have filed post-verdict motions that are currently pending before the court." The lawsuit alleged the Expedition's shifter was defective and that Ford knew there was a problem dating to the 1980s. Ford denied the claims. "Any injury or damage allegedly sustained by Plaintiff," Ford attorney Theresa Wardon Benz wrote in a response last year, "was caused solely by her own negligence in exiting a running vehicle while it was in Reverse, which Plaintiff admitted to Second responders while she was still under the stress of excitement caused by the incident." The Colorado court originally dismissed the case in 2019. After it granted a motion to reconsider, Ford successfully moved the case to Michigan. A motion to transfer the case back to Colorado, however, was granted in 2022 before a seven-day trial in April. |
This vehicle is No. 1 again on Kalea Hall For the third year in a row, Tesla Inc.’s Model Y is the most American-made car, according to a ranking released Tuesday by Cars.com. The Jeep Gladiator produced by Stellantis NV was the only Detroit automaker vehicle to rank in the top 10 on the annual list, coming in at No. 8. Meanwhile, Tesla's Model S and Model X also ranked in the top 10, along with Honda Motor Co.'s Honda Passport, Odyssey and Ridgeline, Toyota Motor Corp.'s Camry and Lexus TX, and the Volkswagen ID.4. To determine if a car qualifies for the American-Made Index, Cars.com evaluates the location of vehicle assembly, parts sourcing as determined by the American Automobile Labeling Act, U.S. factory employment relative to vehicle production, engine sourcing and transmission sourcing. Cars.com researchers independently evaluated more than 400 vehicles to generate the list of 100 vehicles contributing most to the U.S. economy in manufacturing, parts sourcing and employment. Austin, Texas-based Tesla did not repeat its 2023 sweep of the top four spots, with the Model X dropping to No. 9 and the Model 3 landing at No. 21 because of changes in workforce and domestic parts content. “Over the last year, domestic manufacturing was thrust into the spotlight by the recent United Auto Workers organizing efforts and continues to be a hot topic with the impending presidential election,” said Patrick Masterson, lead researcher for Cars.com’s American-Made Index, in a statement. “Pundits championhomegrown corporations as the key to investments in local and state economies. However, when it comes to the global automotive industry, the badge on the hood doesn’t always reveal a vehicle's economic contributions." Masterson noted that 66% of vehicles on the list are made by foreign automakers that support communities in Alabama, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio. While Michigan "remains a powerhouse for auto assembly" with 16 vehicles on the index, more than half of the vehicles on the list were assembled in the South, outpacing the 45% assembled inthe Midwest. Alabama leads Southern states in auto assembly with 15 vehicles on this year's list built there. General Motors Co. has 18 vehicles on the list that were built in Michigan, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee or Texas. The highest-ranking GM vehicle on the list is the Missouri-built Chevrolet Colorado, coming in at No. 23. Despite a 10% decrease in representation on the list since 2020, GM consistently has the most representation. Ford Motor Co. has 12 vehicles on the list, assembled in Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan and Missouri. The Lincoln Corsair at No. 29 and Ford Mustang at No. 31 were Ford's highest-ranking vehicles. Ford's representation on the index has increased 20% since 2020. Stellantis, which considers itself a Netherlands-based company with a headquarters in Auburn Hills, has six vehicles on the index. |
UAW President Shawn Breana Noble Shortly past his one-year anniversary as the United Auto Workers' first directly elected president, Shawn Fain says he's planning to run again in 2026. Arguably the most consequential UAW president since Walter Reuther, labor experts say Fain likely all but solidified a victory. Moving the union from a "reactive" to an "offensive and aggressive" communications strategy, Fain said, has made him a public — and at times sharp-tongued — figure. "I didn't come up here to play around," Fain said in an interview at Solidarity House. "I came up here to effect change. And I intend to keep doing it as long as the membership will choose to have me." Last year's negotiations with Detroit's three automakers secured record contracts following a six-week strike. A $40 million commitment through 2026 to organize autoworkers is yielding results. Volkswagen AG employees in Tennessee voted overwhelmingly to join the UAW. Fain has called for unions to align their contract expirations for a general strike on May 1, 2028. The former administrative assistant spent his first full day as president overseeing a divided bargaining convention after a close runoff against incumbent Ray Curry, an election instituted as a result of a corruption scandal. Uniting the membership through rallies, Facebook Lives and professional-grade videos makes him most proud. "We've put the past behind us," Fain said. "We've done 30 years of work in a year. When you bargain good contracts, you give people a reason to want to be a part of something bigger and better." He cites the appointment of outsiders in the union's success. They include strategist Chris Brooks, Communications Director Jonah Furman, Organizing Director Brian Shepherd and new outside counsel. But most of the staff carried over from the old regime. "They were held back from being inventive and creative, and we've just unleashed them and said, 'Create,'" he said. "The biggest change is not making this about me or not making it about the (International Executive Board). Our focus is on the members now. Why it resonates so well with the public is because when people look at (promotionals), they see themselves." Detroit's automakers agreed to wage hikes, cost-of-living adjustments and billions of dollars in investments. After, competitors improved compensation. In a few months, the UAW said more than 10,000 nonunionized autoworkers signed authorization cards. "Shawn has been so powerful with his narrative," AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler said. "The way he messaged through the strike really galvanized public support. It really gave inspiration to a lot of others." It wasn't all smooth sailing. Ford Motor Co.'s CEO has suggested soured relations with the UAW is causing the automaker to rethink where it builds future vehicles. Fain has criticized job terminations at Stellantis. UAW membership in 2023 fell to its lowest since 2009. Midway through the VW drive, the campaign got a new organizing team, and Fain sent higher education members to assist. "It just felt like we needed some new energy," he said about VW. "It just totally changed the dynamic of that move. That's part of being a leader: you have to be able to adapt and be able to listen to other people. "I don't hate anyone," he added about his approach. "But at the end of the day, this membership pays dues for a reason. And they expect to be treated fairly." |
Ford posts healthy Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose 11% year-over-year in May, boosted by popular new models now hitting dealer lots. Across the industry, inventory levels are up, prompting additional incentives to move vehicles off lots, though elevated vehicle prices and interest rates continue to challenge affordability. Cox Automotive Inc. was forecasting a 3.5% increase in U.S. sales in the industry compared to May 2023. It's already been a big product year for Ford, which sold 190,014 vehicles last month. New models of the refreshed F-150 pickup, new midsize Ranger truck, freshened Lincoln Nautilus and Mustang editions now are available. Meanwhile, the Maverick compact truck posted record sales for the month — up 96%, including its hybrid option, whose sales were up 81% — as did the Transit commercial van. Bronco sales rose 18%. F-Series trucks, however, declined 1.6%. Ranger sales increased by 18%. The Mustang coupe was up 45%. Hybrid sales rose 64.5%, electric vehicle sales were up 64.7% and gas-powered vehicle sales increased by 5.6%. Ford EV sales are off to their best yearly start yet. Sales of Mustang Mach-E SUV sales rose 46%. F-150 Lightning deliveries were up 91%. E-Transit sales increased by 88%. Ford SUVs were up 7.4%, though Bronco Sport sales fell 6.2%. The Explorer, whose refresh launches this summer, gained 15%. Expedition had a 16% increase, and the Escape was up 20%. Lincoln says sales in May increased 28% from a year ago. Nautilus sales rose 36%, including the hybrid version representing 45% of its sales. Corsair and Aviator were up 17% and 131%, respectively. Navigator was down 22%. General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV only report U.S. sales on a quarterly basis. Among other automakers who report monthly, Honda Motor Co. Ltd.'s U.S. sales rose 6.4% year-over-year, Subaru Corp.'s increased 7% and Volvo's grew by 10%. At the end of May, new-car inventory in the industry was 76 days, 23 days higher than a year ago, according to Cox. Incentives are running nearly twice the level seen a year ago. |
Ford CEO says 'partial Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley said Thursday that "partial electrification" options like hybrids and extended-range electric vehicles are more than just "transitional" technologies. The auto industry over the past year has reevaluated all-electric vehicle adoption timelines, given affordability and range challenges. Ford and others have reemphasized hybrid technologies or said they are reintroducing them in the coming years. The circumstances and China's strength in new-energy and advanced driving assistance systems have convinced Farley the company must be able to compete at the low-priced end of the market. "I come here at this moment in time as a CEO much clearer about our executional priorities," Farley said at the Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference. "And the way we need to make our way through this successfully to be a great company is a lot clearer than it was last year." Partial electrification, Farley said, is increasingly part of that solution, noting that the hybrid F-150 truck represents a quarter of sales. Beyond hybrids and plug-in hybrids, the category includes extended-range electric vehicles, or EREVs. Typically, they're vehicles that run fully off batteries, but have a generator, usually a combustion engine, onboard that recharges the battery, extending its range. The combination allows the vehicles to have a smaller battery, which represents most of the cost of an EV. "EREVs in the U.S. could be 120 miles of all-electric, and they drive like EVs," Farley said. "They don't drive like combustion engine vehicles, so you get an EV, and you have 700 miles of range. You don't have range anxiety for a long trip. You don't have to rely on any charges. And those vehicles have half the batteries, so they're very profitable." The fitness test for an automaker, he said, will be how quickly a company can adopt an in-between technology like this: "We really like that solution," Farley said about EREVs. So do competitors. Stellantis NV is expected to launch before the end of the year the Ram 1500 Ramcharger pickup alongside the all-electric Ram 1500 REV. The Ramcharger is an EREV that the company says can provide 690 miles of range — 145 miles from its battery and 545 miles from a 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 eTorque engine. In comparison, the REV's extended-range battery is expected to provide 500 miles. Ford's extended-range all-electric F-150 Lightning truck offers 320 miles. The technology, however, begs the question of how regulators will see it, since it's not a zero-carbon emissions vehicle like traditional EVs, though most trips would be able to be run all-electric, because they're short-distance. Former Ram CEO Tim Kuniskis said Ramcharger sales would count toward Stellantis' EV goals. "We're going to have to talk to all the regulators," Farley said, "because they really bet on pure EVs, but EREVs in China are really the growing part of the EV market." As for the fitness of competitors, Farley suggested Ford's legacy ICE business, particularly its Pro commercial division, is a strength. All-EV brands in the United States and China that don't have a profitable business are going to face capital challenges, he said. He predicted state-owned enterprises in China will be rationalized and noted that the significant capacity for vehicle production that surpasses the Chinese, North American and European markets combined will create pricing pressure on EVs. That consolidation creates opportunity for Ford, Farley said: "The most important part of this consolidation is talent walking from one brand to another." Still, Chinese automakers are ahead of the West in areas like software and digital services, he said. Technologically, Farley said, he'd be surprised if the leaders in Level 3 — categorized as hands-free, eyes-free driving under certain conditions — aren't in the U.S. market in two years. One of the biggest challenges, though, he said is determining under what weather conditions the vehicle can take over all driving functions. "How do you prove the operating domain is safe?" he said. "That part is a little bit less clear to me." Major discussions within Ford about the pricing of such technology are happening now, he said. He likened the opportunity to when he sold for $5,000 a high-occupancy vehicle sticker on his Toyota Prius when he left the Japanese automaker in 2007. "I know at least 16 years ago that people were willing to pay $5,000 to drive in the HOV lane in California for a couple of minutes a day," Farley said. "How much are people willing to pay to get 45 minutes back in their life? I think for a while it's going to be a pretty good run." Ford and Volkswagen AG absorbed autonomy partner Argo AI in 2022 after it struggled to attract more investors. Farley said Ford hasn't split its software teams into a separate division like it had between its ICE and hybrid business called Ford Blue and its EV division, Model e. "It's safety-critical, so you can't just take someone from Apple and Google. You can't fire an airbag from the cloud," Farley said. "I think that the most important thing is to have talent and to have that talent be heavily integrated into the legacy part of the company, because we have a safety product, and so we purposely did not do what others did." That structure is another sign of Ford's various powertrain options being more than just transitional: "We don't differentiate between ICE and non-ICE on digital," Farley said, "because we have this incredible Pro business that will increase and will continue to be ICE. Why would we want to restrict ourselves for our digital revenue to be just EVs?" |
Legislation banning replacement Catherine Lévesque Speaking after the vote, Labour Minister Seamus O'Regan said he was© Provided by National Post OTTAWA — Cheers erupted in the House of Commons on Monday after MPs of all stripes, including Conservatives, unanimously voted in favour of legislation to ban replacement workers used during strikes and lock-outs in federally regulated workplaces. Speaking after the vote, Labour Minister Seamus O’Regan said he was “very relieved, happy and delighted” that all MPs voted in favour of his bill, and said it sends a “real message” to workers across the country that “they are valued and that parliamentarians have heard them.” “This is a big moment for workers in this country. It’s a big moment for labour, and we’re thrilled that it passed unanimously,” said O’Regan. The ban will effect federally regulated sectors including air travel, banks, railways, shipping, telecommunications and radio and TV broadcasters, as well as all Crown corporations, such as Canada Post and the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh took the credit for the legislation going through, thanks to his party’s supply-and-confidence deal with the government. The Liberal party had also promised to ban replacement workers as part of its election platform in 2021. “I want to be clear, this would not have happened but for New Democrats forcing the government to do this,” Singh said. The legislation will now be sent to the Senate, where it will be studied and eventually adopted. The changes will come into effect one year after the bill becomes law. The initial bill proposed 18 months to make the changes come to effect, but it was amended in committee hearings to 12 months instead. The Bloc Quebecois criticized the delays, saying the ban on replacement workers at the federal level should come into effect immediately once the bill receives royal assent. “Why wait a year before its implementation?” asked Bloc House leader Alain Therrien. “Twelve months is much too long. We’ve had this law in Quebec for the past 47 years.” Therrien however said that he hopes the Senate does not decide to amend the legislation once more, as he fears a legislative game of “ping pong” that could delay the bill even more. The Conservatives made it clear last February at second reading that they would support a ban on replacement workers as they seek to court the blue collar vote. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said in a speech last month that his party supported the legislation because “working people have the right to bargain and fight for wage increases that they need in order to keep up with the galloping inflation that has ripped them off.” Singh said he does not buy Poilievre’s position on replacement workers, arguing that he has voted against similar legislation multiple times in the past. “When Conservatives are in power, they attack the strength of unions, they attack the strength of workers, so I have concerns … based on facts, based on Pierre Poilievre’s record,” he said. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has been critical of the legislation, which it said will harm the economy in federally regulated sectors like telecommunications and transportation. “Replacement workers allow organizations in rail, ports, telecom and air to sustain a basic level of ‘lights on’ continuity that preserves critical services for Canadians,” Robin Guy, vice president and deputy leader of government relations for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, wrote in an op-ed in the Financial Post . “There are serious ramifications for all Canadians if we prohibit these workers from keeping those lights on,” he added. O’Regan rejected the assertion that the new legislation would harm the economy, arguing that banning replacement workers in fact speeds up the negotiation process. “You would not believe how disruptive it is … how much time and energy that takes away from what we need their time and energy spent at, which is at the table finding solutions, providing more stability, more certainty for our economy,” he said. |
UAW asks NLRB to reject Kalea Hall Breana Noble The United Auto Workers asked federal officials Friday to reject the results of last week's failed Mercedes-Benz unionization vote and order a new election. The Detroit-based union wants the National Labor Relations Board to void the organizing election the union lost last week at the Mercedes complex in Vance, Alabama — a vote that delivered a blow to the UAW's nationwide autoworker organizing campaign after successfully unionizing Volkswagen AG's plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, in April. The UAW is calling for a new election at Mercedes on the grounds that the German automaker allegedly fired four pro-union workers and allowed anti-union employees to solicit support on company time while barring union supporters from doing the same, among other discriminatory actions. After a five-day election last week, 56% of workers at the Mercedes plant voted against unionizing with the UAW. Kayla Blado, a spokesperson for the NLRB, confirmed in a statement that the agency's Region 10-Atlanta office received the UAW’s three-page filing objecting to the election: "The Regional Director will review the objections and could order a hearing over them. If the Regional Director finds that the employer's conduct affected the election, she can order a new election." The NLRB is also investigating six unfair labor practice charges filed by the UAW since March. The charges allege Mercedes disciplined workers for talking about unionization at work, prevented distribution of union materials and made statements against the union. In a statement Friday, the UAW said that "over 2,000 Mercedes workers voted yes to win their union after an unprecedented, illegal anti-union campaign waged against them by their employer. What that tells us is that in a fair fight, where Mercedes is held accountable to following the law, workers will win their union. All these workers ever wanted was a fair shot at having a voice on the job and a say in their working conditions. "And that’s what we’re asking for here. Let’s get a vote at Mercedes in Alabama where the company isn’t allowed to fire people, isn’t allowed to intimidate people, and isn’t allowed to break the law and their own corporate code, and let the workers decide.” A Mercedes spokesperson responded to the UAW's filing on Friday with a statement, saying: "Over 90 percent of Mercedes-Benz U.S. International (MBUSI) Team Members made their voices heard through a secret-ballot vote and the majority indicated they are not interested in being represented by the UAW for purposes of collective bargaining. "Our goal throughout this process was to ensure every eligible Team Member had the opportunity to participate in a fair election. We sincerely hoped the UAW would respect our Team Members’ decision. Throughout the election, we worked with the NLRB to adhere to its guidelines, and we will continue to do so as we work through this process." The vote count was 2,642 against union representation and 2,045 for, according to results posted by the National Labor Relations Board following the five-day election. Kirk Garner, a 26-year Mercedes employee who has worked on unionizing the plant since 2000, agreed with the union's objections. "What do these objections mean for us going forward? Well, we might get another election out of it," he told The Detroit News via text message. "The company might not be able to change wages, benefits and working conditions. We could probably file for another in April of next year before all this goes to court." Garner added: "The company is going to blame the UAW and say they were ready to improve conditions, but the UAW filed objections." Unfair labor practice charges filed around an election is not uncommon, experts said. The NLRB did not immediately have comprehensive data on rerun elections, but they have happened in recent years — including in Alabama. Workers at an Amazon.com Inc. warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, received a new election in 2022 after labor officials ruled the company's anti-union campaign affected the results of a vote the union lost in 2021, NPR reported. Because of challenged ballots, that second vote has remained undecided. Whether the NLRB takes up a challenge, though, can be affected by who is in the White House. “It depends on whether it’s a Republican or Democrat in power and who is appointed on the committee," said Art Wheaton, an automotive industry specialist at Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School who has done training for automakers like General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. as well as the UAW. "Under the current administration, it’s a little bit more pro-union than the previous administration. There’s specific intent under the NLRB to give more of an even playing field for the union. They’re more proactive to give the workers the opportunity to share their voice if people were blocked from voting or expressing their true intent.” Given comments from Alabama politicians, the number of flyers and commercials around the vote and captive audience meetings with employees, Wheaton said the charges are more than a formality. Filing them also could support the UAW's charges against Mercedes in Germany alleging the company violated a new law on global supply chain practices. Dan Gilmore, a labor attorney who also teaches classes on labor law at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, said by text message that the alleged conduct by Mercedes is "in very sharp contrast to the lack of opposition that VW provided prior to each of the elections involving that automaker, especially the first one in 2014. The allegations described in the objections include some classic conduct that has, in prior cases, resulted in the setting aside of elections and the ordering of new elections." The union's move to seek another vote at Mercedes is consistent with the UAW's actions and $40 million organizing campaign of nonunion autoworkers, said Marc Robinson, principal of consultancy MSR Strategy and a former GM internal consultant who was involved in labor negotiations. Still, even if the NLRB called for a second election, there may not be a high likelihood of the union winning it. Filing the charges, even if unsuccessful, still communicates to others that the union is willing to put up a fight. Leaders might even be happy, Robinson said, if there isn't a second election because another loss would produce another of round of bad headlines for the UAW. "It obviously was a massive setback," he said of the UAW's loss. "They really can’t afford a second consecutive defeat. They would want to be fairly confident, at least for this particular round of organization."
|
New US tariffs on Chinese electric MATTHEW DALY – AP WASHINGTON (AP) — New tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and batteries, solar cells, medical equipment and other goods are intended to protect U.S. jobs and manufacturers. They could raise prices on certain specific items, experts say, though a broad inflationary impact is unlikely in the short term. The tariffs will be phased in over the next three years, officials said. Those that take effect in 2024 include EVs and EV batteries, along with solar cells, syringes, needles, steel and aluminum and more. Some would not take effect until 2026. The election-year tariffs could increase friction between the world’s two largest economies. China’s foreign ministry said in a statement that the tariffs “will seriously affect the atmosphere of bilateral cooperation.” Administration officials say they don’t expect the tariffs to significantly escalate tensions between the two counties, although China is likely to explore ways to respond to the new taxes on its products. President Joe Biden said Chinese government subsidies for EVs and other consumer goods ensure that Chinese companies don’t have to turn a profit, giving them an unfair advantage in global trade. “For years, the Chinese government has poured state money into Chinese companies .... it’s not competition, it’s cheating,’' the Democratic president said Tuesday at the White House. The tariffs come in the middle of the presidential campaign between Biden and his Republican predecessor, Donald Trump, in which they are vying to show who’s toughest on China. The Biden administration has insisted that its approach is more targeted and less inflationary than the across-the-board tariffs proposed by Trump. HOW DO THE TARIFFS AFFECT THE U.S. AUTO INDUSTRY? Under the White House action, tariffs on EVs from China will quadruple, from 25% to 100% this year. There are currently very few EVs from China in the U.S., but the Biden administration and U.S. automakers worry that low-priced, heavily subsidized EVs could soon flood the U.S. market. China’s global exports of EVs grew by 70% from 2022 to 2023. “A 100% tariff rate on EVs will protect American manufacturers from China’s unfair trade practices,″ the White House said in a statement. John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a major industry group, applauded the White House action, saying it would help prevent the U.S. from becoming a “dumping ground” for subsidized Chinese EVs. “We can’t let China’s EV overcapacity problem turn into a U.S. auto industry problem,’' he said. While Chinese EVs are largely a future threat, tariffs on EV batteries may have a more immediate impact because China dominates mining and processing of critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt and graphite used in EV batteries. U.S. automakers such as Ford and Tesla use lithium iron phosphate batteries made in China, said Sam Abuelsamid, principal mobility analyst for Guidehouse Insights. Tesla uses battery cells from China’s Contemporary Amperex Technologies Ltd., or CATL, in versions of its Model 3 car. Ford uses CATL products in some versions of the F-150 Lightning electric pickup and the Mustang Mach E electric SUV. Lithium iron phosphate batteries generally cost less but don’t go as far per charge than the lithium-ion chemistry now in use in most EVs. However, they can handle more frequent fast-charging than other battery chemistries. Ford didn’t immediately respond to a question about battery tariffs but said in a statement that it favors U.S. policies that support American manufacturing and protect supply chains, national security and data privacy. The tariffs could raise the cost of batteries and battery materials for EVs that likely would be passed on to the consumer as part of the vehicle cost. WHAT ABOUT THE SOLAR INDUSTRY? The price of solar panels also may rise because of the new tariffs. The tariff rate on solar cells will increase from 25% to 50% in 2024. The White House said China has used unfair practices to dominate upwards of 80% to 90% of the global solar supply chain. Chinese policies are flooding global markets with artificially cheap solar modules and panels, undermining investment in solar manufacturing outside of China, the White House said. Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, commended the Biden administration for acting to support the continued buildout of U.S. solar and storage manufacturing. The administration was “thoughtful” to exclude tariffs on key machinery used to manufacture solar components in the United States, Hopper said. A temporary tariff exclusion will encourage domestic manufacturing of solar products, she said. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat and clean-energy advocate, was less optimistic. He called the tariffs on solar cells and other items “horrible news for American consumers and a major setback for clean energy.’' “Tariffs are a direct, regressive tax on Americans and this tax increase will hit every family,’' Polis said on X, the social media site. STEEL AND ALUMINUM Tariffs on steel and aluminum products will triple in some cases, from the current range of zero to 7.5% to 25% in 2024. China controls over 50% of global production of steel and aluminum, and its products are “among the world’s most carbon intensive,” the White House said. While the exact effect of the higher tariffs is uncertain, “tariffs do create deadweight loss, so we can expect them to exact some costs on the U.S. economy,’' said Sarah Bauerle Danzman, an associate professor of international studies at Indiana University. Still, “the certainty in price protection that these tariffs afford producers could induce new investments in the U.S. supply chains for these items,’' she added. MEDICAL PRODUCTS Tariff rates on syringes and needles will increase from zero to 50% in 2024, while certain personal protective equipment, including some respirators and face masks, will see tariffs increase from zero to 7.5% now to 25% in 2024. Tariffs on rubber medical and surgical gloves will increase in 2026. The tariffs on needles and syringes should not have a noticeable impact on U.S. supply, according to Steve Brozak, a health care analyst and president of WBB Securities. New Jersey-based Becton, Dickinson and Co. is the largest supplier in the U.S., where manufacturing has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic, Brozak said. The Food and Drug Administration said earlier this month that the supply and manufacturing capacity for plastic syringes made outside China is enough to support current demand. The FDA had warned last fall it was evaluating plastic syringes made in China for potential problems like leaks and breaks. The agency has since recommended that suppliers avoid using those syringes if possible, cooling demand for the Chinese products. Greta Peisch, a former Biden administration trade lawyer, said the tariffs will bolster health and national security by ensuring domestic supplies of crucial medical equipment. “We can argue about whether and how much prices will rise, but this heads off a potential supply bottleneck’’ now and during a future pandemic, she said.
|
Feds have 'significant safety Tom Krisher Detroit — Federal investigators say they have “significant safety concerns” about a Ford SUV recall repair that doesn't fix gasoline leaks that can cause engine fires. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is demanding volumes of information from the automaker as it investigates the fix in a March 8 recall of nearly 43,000 Bronco Sport SUVs from the 2022 and 2023 model years, and Escape SUVs from 2022. All have 1.5-liter engines. Ford Motor Co. says the SUVs have fuel injectors that will crack, allowing gas or vapor to leak near hot engine parts that can cause fuel odors, fires and an increased risk of injuries. In an April 25 letter to Ford released Thursday, the agency's Office of Defects Investigation wrote that based on its review of the recall repairs, it "believes that the remedy program does not address the root cause of the issue and does not proactively call for the replacement of defective fuel injectors prior to their failure.” Ford’s remedy for the leaks is to add a drain tube to send the gas away from hot surfaces, and a software update to detect a pressure drop in the fuel injection system. If that happens, the software will disable the high pressure fuel pump, reduce engine power and cut temperatures in the engine compartment. Owners also will get a “seek service” message. But in the 11-page letter to the automaker, the agency asks Ford to detail any testing it did to verify the remedy resolved the problem and whether hardware repairs are needed. It also asks the company to explain any other remedies that were considered and any cost-benefit analysis the company did when it picked the fix. Safety advocates have said Ford is trying to avoid the cost of replacing the fuel injectors and instead go with a cheaper fix that drains gasoline to the ground. Ford said Thursday it is working with the NHTSA during its investigation. NHTSA also is asking Ford to detail how the software will detect a fuel pressure drop, how much time elapses between cracking and detection, and what messages will be sent to the driver. It also asks what effect disabling the high-pressure fuel pump has on other fuel system parts, and how the SUVs will perform when the pump is disabled. The agency also wants to know how much fuel will leak and whether the amount complies with federal environmental and safety standards. And it wants to hear Ford's take on “its obligations (legal, ethical, environmental and other) to prevent and/or limit fuel leakage onto the roadway at any point during a vehicle's lifespan.” Ford has to provide information to the agency by June 21, the letter said. Depending on the results of its investigation, the agency can seek additional repairs that fix the fuel leaks. The company has said in documents that it has reports of five under-hood fires and 14 warranty replacements of fuel injectors, but no reports of crashes or injuries. In a previous email, Ford said it is not replacing fuel injectors because it is confident the recall repairs “will prevent the failure from occurring and protect the customer.” The new software triggers a dashboard warning light and allows customers to drive to a safe location, stop the vehicle and arrange for service, the company said. NHTSA documents filed by Ford say the problem happens only in about 1% of the SUVs. The company also said it will extend warranty coverage for cracked fuel injectors, so owners who experience the problem will get replacements. Repairs are already available, and details of the extended warranty will be available in June, Ford said. The recall is an extension of a 2022 recall for the same problem, according to Ford. The repair has already been tested on vehicles involved in the previous recall, and Ford said it’s not aware of any problems. The company also said it isn’t recommending that the SUVs be parked only outdoors because there’s no evidence that fires happen when vehicles are parked and the engines are off. NHTSA said in documents that in the 2022 recall, which covered nearly 522,000 Bronco Sports and Escapes, Ford had the same remedy as the latest recall. |
Ford CEO Jim Farley says Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley on Thursday said semi-solid state batteries are "looking very promising for production," as the automaker has emphasized the need for breakthroughs in electric vehicle technology to improve affordability. "We're getting more and more excited about the potential," Farley said in response to a shareholder question during the Dearborn automaker's virtual annual shareholder meeting. "We don't see them ready for mass production yet, but we believe semi-solid state could be in our lineup in the coming years." The largest cost of EVs is their batteries. Solid state batteries are one way researchers are seeking to address that challenge, since they potentially can offer a greater energy density. That means the vehicle would need fewer battery cells to travel the same distance as a vehicle with lithium-ion batteries. In these traditional EV batteries, lithium ions flow through a liquid electrolyte to charge and discharge the battery. In a solid state battery, the liquid electrolyte and separator often are replaced by a polymer or ceramic. Semi-solid state batteries are a variation of that, typically composed of a solid, conductive material suspended in a liquid electrolyte to help ease the movement of the lithium ions. The development of these batteries, though, takes time because of extensive testing required, longevity needed from the batteries, costs and manufacturing challenges. Ford has invested in Colorado-based all-solid-state startup Solid Power Inc., which uses a sulfide-based electrolyte. Farley said Ford's Ion Park team in southeast Michigan is working on the semi-solid state batteries. Farley said leveraging data collected from vehicles, Ford has found most long road trips don't go beyond 350 miles before some kind of break. Offering that as a competitive range seeks to balance the need for range and the ability of consumers to afford an EV. Ford expects its Model e electric vehicle division to lose up to $5.5 billion this year after recording a $1.32 billion loss in the first quarter, double from the same period the year prior. Meanwhile, Ford will have refreshed 60% of the lineup in its Ford Blue division, which includes internal combustion engine vehicles and hybrids, over the past couple of years by the end of 2024, executive chairman Bill Ford Jr. said during the meeting. "I would argue," he said, "that our ICE business is healthier than it's ever been." During the annual meeting, 92.9% of shareholders in an advisory vote approved executive compensation packages. Farley's 2023 compensation package was valued at nearly $26.5 million, and Ford's was $20.6 million. Proposals made by shareholders to have equal voting rights per share, to hold a child labor audit and to increase supply chain traceability disclosures were rejected. |
Ford April sales decline, Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales declined 2.4% in April, though hybrid deliveries hit a new all-time monthly sales peak, the automaker said Thursday. The drop from 184,002 vehicles to 179,588 came from declines for F-Series trucks, Broncos and other SUVs. Auto prices are declining, and automakers, including Ford, said they are increasing incentives, but rising interest rates still have kept monthly payments high. April also had one less selling day than the same month in 2023. "With the impact of tax refund season effectively over, the vehicle market is seeing declining sales momentum," Jonathan Smoke, chief economist for auto information services firm Cox Automotive Inc., wrote in response to the Federal Reserve's decision to keep monetary policy and interest rates unchanged this week. "The next few weeks and months could be challenging if consumers en masse believe they are better off waiting to purchase." General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV only post sales on a quarterly basis. Honda Motor Co. Ltd.'s U.S. sales were flat, Hyundai Motor Co Ltd. was down 3% and Subaru Corp. was up 9.5% Meanwhile, Ford has emphasized hybrids and committed to a full lineup of them by the end of the decade, as electric vehicles haven't kept with sales expectations, are experiencing a price war and consumers remain wary of their cost and the limited access to charging stations. Still, Ford EV sales rose 129% year-over-year. Ford hybrid vehicle sales hit 17,997, up nearly 60% from last year. F-150 and Maverick hybrid trucks drove those sales, rising almost 94% and 64%, respectively. Hybrids represented 22% of F-150 sales. In general, Ford truck and van sales rose 2% in April, though F-Series trucks were down 7.2%, including a nearly 57% increase in the all-electric Lightning version. The automaker started shipping refreshed 2024 F-150s at the end of February and lifted on April 16 a stop-shipment that had been in place since Feb. 9 on the Lightning. The automaker at the start of April also cut a second shift at the Dearborn Electric Vehicle Center that assembles the Lightning. Super Duty sales rose 2.9% year-over-year. Ranger sales increased 3% as the automaker increases production of the all-new model. Maverick compact pickups were up nearly 84%. Transit commercial van vehicles rose 32%, including an almost 86% increase in sales of the electric E-Transit. Heavy trucks fell 28%. SUV sales dropped 9.8% in April from the same month a year ago. Bronco sales declined 12%, the Bronco Sport fell by 33%, Escape dropped by 28% and Edge declined by 29%. Explorer and Expedition were up 5.3% and 26%, respectively. The electric Mustang Mach-E rose 205%. As Mustang celebrates its 60th anniversary, sales of the coupe fell 9.4%. Sales of the Lincoln luxury brand rose 24% from a year ago. The refreshed Nautilus' sales increase by almost 16%, the Corsair rose 163% and the Aviator was up 6.8%. Navigator sales declined by 20%. |
Ford Q1 profits fall 28% as Ford Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. said Wednesday it made $1.3 billion in net income in the first quarter of 2024, a 28% decrease year-over-year, as earnings from Ford's gas-engine and hybrid business tumbled from the ramp-up of the refreshed 2024 F-150 pickup truck. The profit that represented 33 cent earnings per diluted share came on $42.8 billion in revenue, which was up 3.1%. Those are mixed results compared to Wall Street expectations. Analysts, according to Yahoo Finance, on average were projecting the Dearborn automaker to record $37.63 billion in revenue and 40 cents for earnings per share. The Blue Oval's shares in post-market trading were up 2% to $13.31 per share. “Customers want vehicles that they’re passionate about, choices in how they’re powered, quality that’s constantly getting better and great value,“ CEO Jim Farley said in a statement. “With Ford+, we’re increasingly giving them all those things in ways that others don’t and creating a company that will lead for the long haul." For the January-through-March quarter, Ford posted adjusted operating earnings of $2.8 billion, down 18% year-over-year. Operating income of Ford Blue, the company's internal combustion engine and hybrid vehicle business, declined 65% to $905 million with a 4.2% operating margin. Ford's U.S. sales rose 6.8% in the first quarter, though F-Series trucks were down 10%. The automaker, though, now has a full lineup of the refreshed F-150 full-size trucks, including the Lightning all-electric model, and the new midsize Ranger being shipped. Meanwhile, Ford Pro, the commercial vehicle business, was the shining star of the report. It posted more than $3 billion in operating income, up 120% from last year, and a 16.7% operating margin. Super Duty sales drove the increase, according to the automaker. Software services also represented 13% of the earnings, nearing the goal of 20%. The loss posted by Ford Model e, the business unit dedicated to electric vehicles, was $1.32 billion compared to $722 million a year ago. Lightning shipments were held up starting in early February over an undisclosed quality issue. Those shipments resumed last week, though the company cut the third shift of production at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn at the start of April. Ford maintained its guidance for full-year adjusted operating income of $10 billion to $12 billion. The company increased adjusted free cash flow upward: $6.5 billion to $7.5 billion from the initial outlook of $6 billion to $7 billion. Additionally, Ford anticipates capital expenditures for the year of $8 billion to $9 billion, narrowing the $8 billion-to-$9.5 billion original estimation. The company also remains on track to cut $2 billion in areas like materials, freight and manufacturing. Annual adjusted operating earnings outlook remains $8 billion to $9 billion for Ford Pro and $7 billion to$7.5 billion for Ford Blue. The automaker also expects a $5 billion to $5.5 billion loss for Ford Model e. It anticipates earnings before taxes of about $1.5 billion for Ford Credit. Ford will pay a 15-cent regular dividend on June 3 to shareholders of record at close on May 8. Beating expectations on Tuesday, crosstown rival General Motors Co. in the first quarter made $3 billion in net income on revenue of $43 billion, prompting it to increase its guidance for the year. Stellantis NV will report first quarter revenue and shipments on April 30.
|
GM beats profit expectations Kalea Hall General Motors Co. beat Wall Street expectations on Tuesday, delivering first-quarter net income of $3 billion on revenue of $43 billion. The Detroit automaker increased its guidance for the year of adjusted earnings to be in a range of $12.5 billion to $14.5 billion, up from $12 billion to $14 billion. The automaker expects its net income for the year will be between $10.1 billion and $11.5 billion, above its previous guidance of $9.8 billion to $11.2 billion. GM's first-quarter 2024 net income was up from last year's $2.4 billion, which it made on revenue of $40 billion. GM's adjusted earnings per share of $2.62 was above the average Wall Street estimate of $2.14. GM's revenue also beat the Street's average estimate of $41.88 billion. The results come after GM saw a 1.5% decline in overall sales year over year in the first quarter as fleet deliveries slipped 23%. GM's U.S. dealers sold 594,233 new vehicles in the first three months of this year compared with 603,208 a year ago. The automaker noted its retail sales, or sales to individual customers, increased 6%. It attributed the sales decline to the drop in fleet deliveries, which were affected by temporary production constraints on midsize pickups and vans. "Our consumer has been remarkably resilient in this period of higher interest rates," CFO Paul Jacobson said on a conference call. "And we've seen that in all of our transaction prices and our strong go-to-market strategies. It's been a strategy that's worked for us and we think in this environment that we can continue to perform." GM's adjusted earnings before interest and taxes in the first quarter were $3.87 billion, a slight increase from the $3.8 billion reported in the first quarter of 2023. GM's net income margin for the quarter was 6.9%, up from last year's 6%. Pre-tax earnings in GM North America totaled $3.8 billion in the quarter. GM International lost $10 million in pre-tax earnings. GM is focusing on getting more EVs launched this year after selling 16,425 in the United States during the first quarter, down from 20,000 in the first quarter of 2023 — a milestone that was supported by sales of the since-discontinued electric Chevrolet Bolt, which was not based on GM's Ultium EV platform. The automaker did see sizable gains in the EVs based on Ultium. The Bolt, which GM halted production of in December, still led GM's EV sales with 7,040 delivered, down 64% from last year. Meanwhile, the Cadillac Lyriq's sales increased 499% from 968 to 5,800. "In our EV business, we’re seeing good early sales momentum for vehicles like the Cadillac LYRIQ," CEO Mary Barra wrote in a letter to shareholders. "We also continue to see sequential and year-over-year improvements in profitability as we benefit from scale, material cost and mix improvements." GM is aiming to build and wholesale between 200,000 and 300,000 Ultium EVs in North America this year. Ford Motor Co. releases its first-quarter earnings on April 24. Stellantis NV releases first-quarter shipments and revenues on April 30. |
UAW wins big in historic Story by Nora Eckert CHATTANOOGA, Tennessee (Reuters) -Workers at Volkswagen's Tennessee plant have voted to join the United Auto Workers, in a seismic victory for the union as it drives beyond its Detroit base into the U.S. South and West. A majority of eligible workers cast ballots in favor of the union, with the final tally on Friday at 2,628 to 985, or 73% for joining the UAW. The landslide win will make the Chattanooga factory the first auto plant in the South to unionize via election since the 1940s and the first foreign-owned auto plant in the South to do so. It is also a huge shot in the arm for UAW President Shawn Fain's campaign to unionize plants owned by more than a dozen automakers across the U.S., including Tesla. Fain, known for his aggressive bargaining tactics, and his team have committed to spending $40 million through 2026 on the effort. Jubilant workers, some in tears, raised their arms in victory and held aloft "Union Yes" posters as the final tally came in. "I'm exhilarated that we actually accomplished what we set out to accomplish," said VW employee Lisa Elliott as she hugged her coworkers. "Tell Mercedes they’re next," she cheered. A Mercedes plant in Alabama, at which a majority of workers have signed cards indicating they support unionization, will be the next facility to hold a UAW election, during the week of May 13. "You all have just done the most important thing a working class person can do, and that is stand up," Fain told workers at the count watch party. "You guys will lead the way. We will carry this fight on to Mercedes and everywhere else," he added. Although the UAW narrowly lost votes at the same plant in 2014 and 2019, this year's vote was preceded by surging public support for unions and successful contract negotiations last year with the Big Three automakers. "The margin is overwhelming," said Harley Shaiken, professor of labor at the University of California, Berkeley. "This is a historic moment." VW took a neutral position on the vote at its only non-union factory globally. The UAW has previously represented VW workers at a Pennsylvania plant that built Rabbit cars before it closed in 1988. The UAW - which has seen its membership fall as Detroit automakers restructured - has for decades struck out at southern auto plants, where anti-union sentiment has long been entrenched. Earlier this week Republican governors in six southern states including Tennessee spoke out in opposition to the union drive. In addition to the two narrow losses at VW previously, the UAW sustained three more significant misses at southern factories owned by Nissan, the last in 2017 in Mississippi. But the broader labor movement has since gone through somewhat of a renaissance, with a record number of workers across various industries going on strike last year. Last autumn U.S. President Joe Biden walked picket lines outside Detroit, where the union scored double-digit percentage raises as well as cost-of-living increases from General Motors, Ford Motor and Stellantis. That sparked a wave of hikes by non-union automakers that some analysts said were designed to keep out unions. Biden rebuked the Republican governors after the vote, citing several union victories in recent months. "These union wins have helped raise wages and demonstrate once again that the middle-class built America and that unions are still building and expanding the middle class for all workers," he said in a statement. In addition to the Mercedes plant, the UAW has said that more than 30% of employees at a Hyundai plant in Alabama and at a Missouri Toyota auto parts factory have signed cards indicating they want to join the UAW. Pro-union workers at the VW plant say they have campaigned to secure improved safety on the job, better work-life balance and improved benefits. "Now that it’s official I can relax," said Robert Crump, who has worked at VW for 12 years, and voted yes in all three union elections. "It’s a really good feeling." |
Ford recalls nearly 43,000 SUVs Associated Press Detroit – Ford is recalling nearly 43,000 small SUVs because gasoline can leak from the fuel injectors onto hot engine surfaces, increasing the risk of fires. But the recall remedy does not include repairing the fuel leaks. The recall covers certain Bronco Sport SUVs from the 2022 and 2023 model years, as well as Escape SUVs from 2022. All have 1.5-liter engines. Ford says in documents filed with U.S. safety regulators that fuel injectors can crack, and gasoline or vapor can accumulate near ignition sources, possibly touching off fires. Dealers will install a tube to let gasoline flow away from hot surfaces to the ground below the vehicle. They’ll also update engine control software to detect a pressure drop in the fuel injection system. If that happens, the software will disable the high pressure fuel pump, reduce engine power and cut temperatures in the engine compartment, according to documents posted Wednesday on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website. Owners were to be notified by letter starting April 1. The company says in documents it has reports of five under-hood fires and 14 warranty replacements of fuel injectors, but no reports of crashes or injuries. In an email, Ford said it is not replacing fuel injectors because it is confident the recall repairs “will prevent the failure from occurring and protect the customer.” The new software also will trigger a dashboard warning light and allow customers to drive to a safe location, stop the vehicle and arrange for service, the company said. NHTSA documents filed by Ford say the problem happens only in about 1% of the SUVs. The company also said it will extend warranty coverage for cracked fuel injectors, so owners who experience the problem will get replacements. Ford said repairs are already available, and details of the extended warranty will be available in June. Ford said the recall is an extension of a 2022 recall for the same problem. The repair has already been tested on vehicles involved in the previous recall, and Ford said it's not aware of any problems. The company also said it isn't recommending that the SUVs be parked only outdoors because there's no evidence that fires happen when vehicles are parked and the engines are off. Michael Brooks, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Auto Safety, called Ford's remedy for the fuel leaks a “Band-aid type recall” and said the company is trying to avoid the cost of repairing the fuel injectors. A 1% failure rate, he said, is high, and even with the repairs, drivers still could be forced to exit a freeway at a low speed, placing them at risk of a crash. NHTSA, he said, should do more to make sure recalls fix the root causes of vehicle problems rather than making less-costly repairs. In the past, NHTSA has said it does not have legal authority to pre-approve recall fixes. But in a statement Wednesday, the agency said it will “closely track their performance using field data.” The agency said owners who have questions should contact their dealership or Ford. Brooks said Congress should change the law so the agency can “require something more than the rubber stamp that NHTSA is currently deploying” on recalls. The agency, he said, has been more aggressive of late in investigating recall fixes. “That is a post-remedy inquiry that won't make the fixes better, and further stretches out the process and leaves consumers in limbo,” he said. |
Ford delays EV launches, will Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. on Thursday said it will delay the launch of new three-row electric vehicles in Ontario, adjust the timing of its next-generation electric truck and will offer hybrid powertrain across its entire internal combustion engine lineup in North America by the end of the decade. Executives of the Dearborn automaker have admitted that they and the industry got the adoption growth timeline for EVs wrong after a leap in sales amid a global microchip shortage and limited inventories that skewed expectations on capacity for EVs and batteries. With greater availability of all vehicles, the majority of customers are showing they aren't ready for EVs because of how expensive they are, the lack of accessible and reliable charging infrastructure and how fast they take to charge up. Although Ford reported U.S. first-quarter EV sales rose 86% and hybrids were up 42% year-over-year, it expects to lose at least $5 billion on its Model e EV division in 2024 even after cutting $12 billion in planned EV investments. Tesla Inc., the top seller of EVs in the United States, posted a global sales decrease of 8.5%. General Motors Co.'s U.S. EV sales also fell to almost 16,500, down from 20,000 in the first quarter of 2023. “As the No. 2 EV brand in the U.S. for the past two years, we are committed to scaling a profitable EV business, using capital wisely and bringing to market the right gas, hybrid and fully electric vehicles at the right time,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a statement. “Our breakthrough, next-generation EVs will be new from the ground up and fully software enabled, with ever-improving digital experiences and a multitude of potential services.” Ford says it wants to give the market for three-row EVs to develop further and take advantage of emerging battery technologies that could offer more range and better value. Leaders have discussed how the company is shifting its focus to cheaper, smaller EVs, including the development of a new platform with a small "skunkworks" team in California. As a result, launch of the vehicles at Oakville Assembly Plant will begin in 2027 instead of the previously expected 2025. Retooling of the plant from from the gas-powered Edge crossover still is expected to begin in the second quarter. Some skilled trades workers will maintain their position through the updates, but most of the 2,700 employees at the plant will be on layoff until production resume again. The company says it will work with Canadian labor union Unifor to mitigate the effect of the delay on workers. Ford also is tweaking the timing of the next all-electric F-Series truck that will be built at the sprawling $5.6 billion Blue Oval City campus being constructed in Tennessee — a part of the $11.4 billion in investments Ford announced in 2021 in that state and Kentucky, the single largest manufacturing investment in its history. Deliveries of the trucks will begin in 2026. The automaker previously said their production would begin in 2025. Construction continues on the BlueOval SK joint venture battery plants in Tennessee and Kentucky, though one of the plants in Kentucky already has been delayed by a year. Progress at BlueOval Battery Park in south-central Michigan's Marshall also proceeds for Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.-licensed lithium-iron-phosphate battery production. That technology is less expensive than traditional lithium-ion batteries. Ford also is expanding Ohio Assembly Plant in Avon Lake for a Ford Pro commercial EV; installation of tooling is expected to begin in spring 2025. Unifor extremely disappointed in APRIL 9, 2024 TORONTO—Unifor calls on Ford Motor Company to consider all possible options to mitigate the negative impact on workers following the announced substantial delay in the launch of EV production at the Oakville Assembly Plant. “Unifor is extremely disappointed by the company’s decision. Our members have done nothing but build best-in-class vehicles for Ford Motor Company and they deserve certainty in the company’s future production plans,” said Unifor National President Lana Payne. “I want to be very clear here. Our members can be assured that we will push the company to explore every single possible opportunity to lessen the impact of this decision on them and their families.” Ford has announced that while the retooling of Oakville Assembly Plant will commence this Spring as planned, the company is delaying the launch of EV production from 2025 to 2027. Unifor was informed of the revised timeline during a meeting with Ford executives earlier this week. Unifor represents more than 5,600 Ford Canada workers, including 3,200 Local 707 members employed at the Oakville Assembly Plant. In 2020, Ford announced an historic $1.8 billion investment to retool the Oakville Plant for EV and battery pack production. In 2023 contract negotiations with Ford, Unifor negotiated innovative income and benefit transition supports, covering members at the Oakville plant for what was originally forecasted to be an eight-month retooling period. Negotiations included a provision that should the retooling period extend beyond eight months the company and the union will meet to discuss extending this arrangement. “There will be unexpected setbacks in the transition to EV, but we fully expect Ford to investigate every available option to support our Oakville members. It is unacceptable, after 120 years of operation in this country, that Ford does not plan to build a single vehicle in Canada for years on end,” said Local 707 Oakville Assembly Complex Chairperson Marc Brennan. Given the magnitude of the delay Unifor has requested a meeting with Ford to be held as soon as possible to discuss job and income security measures for workers. Ford Edge production at Oakville Assembly is scheduled to end in approximately one month. “This is a significant setback and while the first stages of retooling are still on track and we remain committed to securing an EV future for the workers of Oakville, the immediate challenges faced by our members will be front and centre in our discussions with the company,” Payne added. Unifor is Canada's largest union in the private sector and represents 315,000 workers in every major area of the economy. The union advocates for all working people and their rights, fights for equality and social justice in Canada and abroad, and strives to create progressive change for a better future. |
Ford pickups probed over Associated Press Detroit — U.S. auto safety regulators are investigating complaints that more than 540,000 Ford pickup trucks can abruptly downshift to a lower gear and increase the risk of a crash. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says in documents posted on its website Friday that it opened the investigation this week after receiving 86 consumer complaints about the problem with the trucks' automatic transmissions. Investigation documents say the probe covers F-150s from the 2014 model year. The agency is looking into whether those trucks should have been included in previous recalls for the problem. The complaints allege that the trucks can suddenly shift to a lower gear without warning. Often, the rear wheels locked up, with one consumer telling the agency that his truck downshifted abruptly, causing it to crash into a concrete barrier and another vehicle. Both the pickup driver and the driver of the other vehicle were hurt. The company said it’s working with NHTSA to support the investigation. Ford’s F-Series pickups are the top-selling vehicles in the U.S. Certain F-150 pickups from the 2011 and 2012 model years were recalled for the same problem in 2016. Ford later added 2013 models to the recall. |
Cultural LTC admissions drying By Allison Jones, The Canadian Press In an Italian long-term care home in Toronto, about three new non-Italian residents are admitted each month due to government changes to priority rules, leaving them confused and isolated in a setting where they do not speak the language. Villa Colombo’s programming is done in Italian, and many of the new residents don’t speak Italian or even English, said executive director Lisa Alcia. But they are being admitted because of how hospital patients who can be discharged but can’t be cared for at home are now prioritized. “I feel for these residents,” Alcia said. “They’ve been in a hospital, now they’re forced into an environment where all the residents around them speak Italian, and they don’t. If you’ve got slight dementia, that triggers a whole lot of negative behaviours because you’re culturally isolated.” It’s a situation playing out in the several dozen cultural long-term care homes across the province, which cater to seniors from Korean, Jewish, francophone and many other communities, according to the association representing non-profit homes. A law known as Bill 7, enacted in 2022, has garnered much criticism for allowing people to be placed in a long-term care home not of their choosing, but AdvantAge Ontario CEO Lisa Levin said the law has had other consequences as well. “The priority has gone to … people coming out of the hospitals and there’s a very rigid bureaucracy behind these admissions,” she said. “So the first person on the list could be someone who doesn’t have a preference for a cultural home and the second person on the list could be someone who wants to get into a Finnish home, because they’re Finnish. The first available space may be in a Finnish home. It will go to the other person who was No. 1 on the list.” Bill 7 is aimed at moving so-called alternate level of care patients — who can be discharged from hospital but need a long-term care bed and don’t yet have one — in order to free up hospital space. If there are no spaces available in long-term care homes a patient has put on their preferred list, they can instead be transferred to a home up to 70 kilometres away — or 150 kilometres if they are in northern Ontario — selected by a placement co-ordinator at the hospital. Hospitals are required to charge patients $400 a day if they refuse the transfer. Levin, of AdvantAge Ontario, said it seems like the impact on cultural home admissions was an unintended consequence of Bill 7 and she has had “encouraging” conversations with Minister Stan Cho about how to address it. Cho, who took over as long-term care minister in a cabinet shuffle in September, said that as a Korean Canadian, issues around cultural homes are hugely important to him. “We are looking actively at a solution,” he said. “We think there’s some good traction with the homes as well as organizations like AdvantAge to find that. You don’t want unintended consequences to have further unintended consequences, especially when we have an overall capacity issue.” At the Ivan Franko Long-Term Care Home, a Ukrainian cultural home in Toronto, occupancy is at about 25 per cent non-Ukrainian residents, up from between eight and 10 per cent pre-pandemic, said CEO Olya Vovnysh. “We go far and beyond … we do anything possible (that) we can do for them to provide best care environment,” she said. “I would say that those residents, they face challenges in adapting to our culture, traditions, cuisine and our home.” When it comes to cuisine, for example, the Ukrainian menu features potatoes prominently, but people from some other cultures prefer rice or pasta, leaving the dietary staff preparing extra meals, she said. Ukrainians celebrate Orthodox Easter, which this year falls on May 5, but the home has now started having two Easter celebrations in order to accommodate residents who celebrated it this year at the end of March, Vovnysh said. Staff members also try to greet all of the residents in their own language and ask them basic questions about their needs, for example asking if they would like a drink of water, she said. It is becoming more challenging with people in the home from Canadian, Jamaican, Polish, Italian, Romanian, Serbian, French, Cuban, Spanish, Greek, Portuguese, Croatian, Russian and German backgrounds. Vovnysh said she doesn’t want to criticize the government, which she said has provided a lot of supports, but she hopes the admissions process can be improved. “It’s not about legislation,” she said. “It’s about people and their choices … Not every Canadian wants to be in a Canadian home. Not every representative of a specific ethnic group wants to be at an ethnic group home. There are choices and we need to enable that choice and understand their needs.” |
Here's the value of Ford Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley's 2023 compensation package totaled nearly $26.5 million — up 26% from 2022's following changes to the awarding of stock grants. The total package that Farley, 61, earned in 2023 included an unchanged base salary of $1.7 million. Most of the upped value in his and other executives' packages came from an increase in the value reported of stock awards after the automaker changed its calculation of the grants by hinging a majority of their vestment on future shareholder returns relative to other corporations. The automaker reported the value of those stock awards as $20.3 million, which is up 26% from 2022, though a fraction of that so far has been vested. The total value could differ based on Ford's stock worth when those awards vest after a certain amount of time or, for most, the performance metric is met. Farley's bonuses decreased 13% to almost $2.4 million after the automaker missed certain performance targets. The automaker didn't disclose which. Farley also received more than $2 million worth of other compensation, up 46% year-over-year, in the form of perks like the use of private aircraft and company vehicles. Farley's total compensation amounted to 312 times the median annual total compensation of all Ford employees last year: $84,829. That was up from 281 times in 2022, when the median employee compensation was $74,691. Executive compensation was disclosed in an annual proxy statement filed Friday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Last year, Ford flipped an annual net loss to profit. In 2023, it recorded $4.3 billion in net income, up from a $2 billion net loss in 2022. Despite facing challenges around quality and a United Auto Workers strike, Executive Chairman Bill Ford Jr. said it was a "solid year." "Our 2023 results underscore the potential of our plan, our leadership, and our people," he said in a letter to shareholders in the proxy statement. "Looking ahead, we have an opportunity to deliver a very strong 2024 and differentiate Ford like never before." Ford's total compensation was $20.6 million in 2023, up 19% from $17.3 million in 2022. The package included an unchanged $1.7 million salary. His stock awards as reported were up 23% to $15.8 million. Bonuses were down 13% to $705,600. “Bill’s and Jim’s salaries were flat with 2022 and their bonuses were down — and well below target levels — based on the overall performance of our business," spokesperson T.R. Reid said. "Most of their potential compensation is directly tied to the best interests of shareholders, primarily in stock grants. The reported value of those grants is hypothetical, since they’re dependent on future performance. And much of the estimated value of the grants was higher because of a change in how it’s calculated specifically as a result of our decision to link the stock grants exclusively to total shareholder return.” The report drew criticism from UAW President Shawn Fain, who in a recent statement criticized remarks from Farley about rethinking where the automaker builds its vehicles. Fain's statement came after the union stopped production at the Kentucky Truck Plant during last fall's targeted strike, despite Ford employing more UAW members than the other two companies and building all of its full-size trucks in UAW-represented plants. “Just a few weeks ago Farley was crying to the press about how the UAW’s record contracts were forcing the company to rethink where they build their vehicles, but they have no problem finding the money to give him a 26% pay raise to $26.5 million a year," Fain said in a statement Friday. “Let’s be clear: this is corporate greed, plain and simple." The company is required to report compensation packages for all of its top five named executives. They all saw their compensation packages increase except for Peter Stern, president of integrated services, who joined Ford last year. Chief Financial Officer John Lawler's total compensation was about $10 million in 2023, up 12%. His salary was up 5.5% to almost $1.2 million. The $5.4 million in stock awards as reported were down 17%. Bonuses were up 27% to $1.4 million. Doug Field is the chief advanced product development and technology officer. His compensation of $15.3 million was up 1.7%. His base salary rose 2.7% to $513,500. The value of stock awards was reported as basically flat for him at $14.2 million. Bonuses totaled $440,748, up 32%. Stern received $8.3 million last year after starting in August at Ford. He came from Apple Inc. For 2023, executives' annual bonuses were based on the company's performance on percentage margin for adjusted operating income, quality improvement, electric vehicle growth and growth in valued-added services. Their payout is based on a formula that includes their base salary, and modifiers including a business performance factor and an individual performance factor. Their individual performance factors were set at 84% last year. Rival Stellantis NV's package to CEO Carlos Tavares last year included direct compensation, incentives, non-vested stock grants and other benefits. For his third year leading the maker of Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles, the total remuneration was $39.5 million. General Motors Co. hasn't released its executive compensation numbers for 2023. Its proxy statement usually is filed in April. In 2022, GM CEO Mary Barra was the highest-paid Detroit auto executive with a $28.97 million package. |
Volkswagen workers to vote on Associated Press Detroit – Workers at Volkswagen’s factory in Chattanooga, Tennessee, will vote next month on whether they want to be represented by the United Auto Workers union. The National Labor Relations Board said Monday that the election will take place from April 17 to 19 at the plant, in the first test of the union's effort to organize nonunion automobile factories across the nation. Workers at the 3.8 million square foot (353,353 square meter) factory with more than 4,000 production workers filed paperwork March 18 seeking the election. Both sides reached agreement to have the election in April, the NLRB said. The UAW announced its organizing campaign last fall after it won strong contracts with Detroit automakers. The UAW said it would simultaneously target more than a dozen nonunion auto plants including those run by Tesla, Nissan, Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, Kia, Toyota, Honda, and others. The drive covers nearly 150,000 workers at factories largely in the South, where the union thus far has had little success in recruiting new members. The UAW said a supermajority of the VW plant’s production workers had signed cards supporting union representation, but it would not provide a number. A union can seek an election run by the NLRB once a majority of workers support it. Volkswagen has said it respects the workers' right "to a democratic process and to determine who should represent their interests. “We will fully support an NLRB vote so every team member has a chance to vote in privacy in this important decision.” Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee recently told reporters that he opposed the factory unionizing, saying that it was important for employees to “keep their future in their own hands.” Lee opposed a similar organizing effort at the same plant in 2019, warning that business recruitment could take a hit. But Isaac Meadows, one of the VW workers who make Atlas SUVs and the ID.4 electric vehicle, said in a union statement that they want better lives for their families. “We need a say in our schedules, benefits, pay, and more. We’re proud to work at Volkswagen, but we also know the value of a voice at work.” he said. The union has come close to representing workers at the VW plant in two previous elections. In 2014 and 2019, workers narrowly rejected a factorywide union under the UAW. The year after the 2014 vote failed, 160 Chattanooga maintenance workers won a vote to form a smaller union, but Volkswagen refused to bargain. Volkswagen had argued the bargaining unit also needed to include production workers. As a result, the 2019 factory-wide vote followed. In February the union said a majority of workers at a Mercedes plant in Vance, Alabama, near Tuscaloosa, also had signed union cards. The Alabama factory complex has about 6,100 employees. The union embarked on its organizing effort last year after it went on strike against General Motors, Ford and Stellantis, earning big raises and other benefits. After the Detroit Three contracts were approved, many nonunion factories announced worker pay increases. In November, VW gave workers an 11% pay raise at the plant, but the union says VW’s pay still lags behind Detroit automakers. Top assembly plant workers in Chattanooga make $32.40 per hour, VW said. The UAW pacts with Detroit automakers include 25% pay raises by the time the contracts end in April of 2028. With cost-of-living increases, workers will see about 33% in raises for a top assembly wage of $42 per hour, plus annual profit sharing. |
Most automated driving systems are Tom Krisher Detroit — Most electronic systems that take on some driving tasks for humans don't adequately make sure drivers are paying attention, and they don't issue strong enough warnings or take other actions to make drivers behave, according to an insurance industry study published Tuesday. Only one of 14 partially automated systems tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety performed well enough to get an overall “acceptable” rating. Two others were rated “marginal,” while the rest were rated “poor.” No system received the top rating of “good.” “Most of them don't include adequate measures to prevent misuse and keep drivers from losing focus on what's happening on the road,” said IIHS President David Harkey. The institute, Harkey said, came up with the new ratings to get automakers to follow standards, including how closely they watch drivers and how fast the cars issue warnings if drivers aren't paying attention. It also says it is trying to fill a “regulatory void” left by inaction on the systems from the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Harkey said the agency needs to do more to set standards for the systems, which are not able to drive vehicles themselves. The agency said Tuesday that it welcomes the IIHS research and will review the report. IIHS safety ratings are closely followed by automakers, which often make changes to comply with them. The 14 systems, which include several variations from single automakers, are among the most sophisticated now on the market, Harkey said. Only one of the systems, Teammate in the Lexus LS, earned the adequate rating. General Motors' Super Cruise in the GMC Sierra and Nissan's Pro-Pilot Assist with Navi-Link in the Ariya electric vehicle were rated marginal. Other systems from Nissan, Tesla, BMW, Ford, Genesis, Mercedes-Benz and Volvo were rated poor. Harkey said the driving systems initially were combinations of safety features such as automatic emergency braking, lane departure warnings, lane centering and blind-spot detection. But now they give drivers the chance to not pay attention for some period of time, raising safety risks, he said in an interview. “That's why the focus is on how do we make sure that the driver remains focused on the driving task,” Harkey said. Some automakers, he said, market the systems in a way that drivers could think they are fully autonomous. “The one thing we do not want is for drivers to misinterpret what these things can or cannot do,” he said. The systems, IIHS said, should be able to see if a driver's head or eyes are not directed on the road, and whether their hands are on the wheel or ready to grab it if necessary. The institute also said if a system doesn't see a driver's eyes on the road or hands aren't ready to steer, there should be audible and visual alerts within 10 seconds. Before 20 seconds, the system should add a third alert or start an emergency procedure to slow down the vehicle, the institute said. Automakers should also make sure safety systems such as seat belts and automatic emergency braking are activated before the driving systems can be used, it said. None of the 14 systems met all the driver monitoring requirements in the test, but Ford's came close, the group said. Lexus' Teammate system and GM's Super Cruise met the warning requirements, while systems from Nissan and Tesla were close. Harkey said automakers already are responding to the tests and preparing changes, many of which can be accomplished with software updates. Toyota, which makes Lexus vehicles, said it considers IIHS ratings in setting up safety standards, while GM said the IIHS ratings are important. Nissan said it will work with the institute. Mercedes said the company said it takes the findings seriously, and it relies on the system collaborating with the driver, while Hyundai luxury brand Genesis said it is quickly improving its system, including the addition of an in-cabin camera. BMW said it respects IIHS's efforts, but it differs philosophically about how systems should monitor drivers. One BMW system evaluated by IIHS is not intended for drivers to take their hands off the wheel and only considers input from steering wheel sensors. BMW tests have not found a clear advantage in turning on the driver monitoring camera, the company said. Another more sophisticated system intended for drivers to take hands off the steering wheel uses a camera to watch drivers, the company said. Ford said its Blue Cruise system monitors drivers and sends repeated warnings. The company said it disagrees with IIHS’ findings but will consider its feedback in updates. Other automakers did not immediately comment. |
Manitoba Public Insurance 2nd lawsuit filed against Ford by public insurer over block heater fires Sarah Petz · CBC MPI is suing Ford for the cost of eight vehicles that burned in Manitoba from March 2022 to April 2023. (Lloyd Carr/Shutterstock) Manitoba Public Insurance has launched another lawsuit against Ford, alleging faulty block heaters caused fires that destroyed eight vehicles in the province. The lawsuit against Ford Motor Company of Canada Ltd., which was filed last week in Court of King's Bench, claims the fires were caused by defects in the design, manufacture and/or installation of the block heaters. The fires happened in Russell, Kenville, Stonewall and Winnipeg from March 2022 to April 2023, according to the statement of claim. In all cases, the vehicles' block heaters were "plugged into an appropriate power source" when the fires started and were damaged "beyond reasonable repair," the statement of claim says. In one example, a 2014 Escape was plugged into a power source inside a parkade in Winnipeg last February when it caught fire, and the flames spread to two other Ford vehicles parked nearby, the lawsuit says. The insurer's lawsuit accuses the vehicle manufacturer of negligence by failing to adequately test the block heaters to make sure they were free from defects and/or properly installed. As the insurer of the vehicles, MPI's lawsuit is seeking $252,212 in damages, which is the sum of the costs MPI had to pay out to the owners of the eight vehicles, plus court costs. The lawsuit doesn't say whether any of the vehicles' block heaters or other parts were subject to safety recalls. Second lawsuit This is the second time in less than a year that MPI has sued Ford over a block heater fire. Last November, the insurer filed a statement of claim seeking $15,932 for the loss of a 2014 Escape that caught fire outside a business on Raleigh Street in Winnipeg while its block heater was plugged in. There were 127 vehicle-fire-related claims involving block heaters or block heater cords in gas or diesel vehicles reported to MPI from 2019 to 2023, including 41 in 2022 and 21 in 2023, data provided by the public insurer says. When it comes to hybrid vehicles, MPI received 30 claims for the same issue within the same time period. None of the claims have been tested in court and no statement of defence has been filed yet. CBC News reached out to Ford for comment but has not received a response. |
GreenShield call centre shut Online services not impacted By Terry Gangcuangco Non-profit health and benefits company GreenShield has issued a service update amid the ongoing strike by Unifor-represented workers in Windsor and Toronto. “GreenShield is disappointed by the decision of Unifor Locals 240 & 673 to strike instead of continuing to bargain,” the company said on Monday (March 4). “We remain optimistic that a settlement will be reached through constructive and focused discussions. In the meantime, we have strong contingency plans in place, which we will leverage to provide essential services for our valued clients, including the vulnerable communities we support across the country. “Please note that our call centre is closed; however, our online services, where almost 95% of our claims are typically submitted, will continue to be available and will not be impacted by the Unifor strike. We encourage you to use these services where possible as we work to mitigate any service impacts.” The statement comes after more than 600 Unifor members hit the picket line after midnight on March 1 amid issues surrounding fair wages, job security, and contracting out. Of these, over 580 are from Windsor, and 24 are from Toronto. Unifor national president Lana Payne declared: “It is extremely disappointing that a deal could not be reached. Our bargaining committee worked hard to get there, but it takes two to tango. We expect the employer to come to the bargaining table with the goal of getting an agreement that our members can support.” According to Jodi Nesbitt, president of Unifor Local 240, assurances have not been provided that “work would not be taken away” from their members, whose roles span adjudicators and call centre representatives, as well as positions in accounting, client administration, and IT services. Unifor Local 673 president Maryellen McIlmoyle added: “GreenShield purchased a lot of entities over the years, and we just want to ensure job security isn’t being outsourced. This is the first time in 65 years in GreenShield’s existence there has been a strike.” Negotiations for a new collective agreement began on January 15, with the previous contract expiring at the end of February 2024. “The Unifor strike impacts GreenShield Insurance as well as GreenShield Administration’s claims adjudication business (formally HBM+) only. It does not impact GreenShield Health or GreenShield Administration’s other services,” GreenShield said. |
Ford agrees to pay DOJ Story by Will Potter For Dailymail.Com and Reuters DOJ said Ford presented customs officers with 'sham rear seats' and other temporary features to make them falsely appear to be passenger vehicles This allowed Ford to avoid paying the 25 percent duty rate that is placed on all cargo vehicles, prosecutors alleged, instead paying duty of just 2.5 percent Ford are set to pay $365 million to resolve allegations the auto giant violated US federal tariff law by understating the value of its Transit Connect vehicles. The Department of Justice said the settlement has resolved the allegations, which centered on a suspected scheme to avoid higher duties by misclassifying cargo vans imported from Turkey from April 2009 to March 2013. The government said the settlement is one of the largest customs penalty settlements in recent history. 'When companies misclassify imports to avoid paying what they owe, they will be held accountable,' declared Acting Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer following the settlement. Ford is accused of adding fake rear seats to its Ford Transit Connect vehicles (pictured) to trick US border patrol into believing they are passenger cars, before ripping them out to avoid a 25 percent cargo tax © Provided by Daily Mail Mizer praised the settlement as a 'victory for American taxpayers', and to 'combat trade fraud and ensure compliance with United States trade laws.' Ford are set to pay $365 million to resolve allegations the auto giant violated US federal tariff law by understating the value of its Transit Connect vehicles. The Department of Justice said the settlement has resolved the allegations, which centered on a suspected scheme to avoid higher duties by misclassifying cargo vans imported from Turkey from April 2009 to March 2013.©South China Morning Post via Get / AP The settlement is notably not an admission of guilt on the part of Ford, but rather settles the allegations against it levied by the US government. 'Companies that attempt to evade customs duties with sham representations and workarounds will not be rewarded,' he added. Specifically, the DOJ accused Ford of carrying out a multi-year scheme in its importation of cargo vans into the US from Turkey. Prosecutors said the company presented customs officers with 'sham rear seats' and other temporary features to make them falsely appear to be passenger vehicles. 'These temporary rear seats were never intended to be, and never were, used to carry passengers,' the DOJ alleged in a statement after the settlement. It was claimed that the fake door features would allow Ford to avoid paying the 25 percent duty rate that is placed on all cargo vehicles, as they would technically be classified as passenger vehicles instead. By carrying out the alleged scheme, Ford would instead pay a duty rate of just 2.5 percent. Despite telling border patrol that they were 'principally designed for the transport of persons', Ford would then allegedly modify the transits and rip out the rear seating. David Westerman, Managing Director of Ford's Asia Pacific Emerging Markets division, at the presentation of the Transit Connect © Provided by Daily Mail Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, said after the settlement: 'Importers have an obligation to truthfully declare the nature of their products and pay the duties that are owed. 'The government will not permit companies to evade duties by adding sham features to their products and then misclassifying them.' 'This settlement, which is one of the largest customs penalty settlements in recent history, demonstrates that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will pursue even the largest companies to ensure that all importers follow the rules,' added Senior Official Performing Duties of the Commissioner Troy A. Miller of CBP. 'Our intent is to enforce the customs laws fairly, which means that non-compliance is not an option for anyone. 'The partnership between CBP and the Justice Department provides a critical safeguard to protect the revenue of the United States.'
|
UAW hits initial organizing Breana Noble The United Auto Workers said Wednesday that 30% of workers at a Toyota Motor Corp. subsidiary plant in Missouri have signed union authorization cards. The facility is the first Toyota plant to meet the union's threshold to announce a public organizing campaign since the UAW last fall expressed its intention to seek to double its autoworker membership with campaigns at more than a dozen automakers. The Troy, Missouri, plant every day produces thousands of cylinder heads — the engine's lungs — for Toyota engines produced in North America, according to the company's website. As of August, the site employed 1,037 people. When 30% of workers at a workplace sign authorization cards, a union is eligible to pursue a National Labor Relations Board election there. The UAW's strategy calls for demanding that a company recognize its representation when 70% of workers at a plant sign cards, or else pursue an election. The announcement comes after the union last week said a majority of workers at Mercedes-Benz Group's Tuscaloosa plant in Alabama had signed cards weeks after workers at Volkswagen AG's Chattanooga, Tennessee, plant reached that threshold. Hyundai Motor Co. workers in Montgomery, Alabama, also have an ongoing public organizing campaign. The UAW has committed $40 million to the organizing efforts at automakers and battery manufacturers through 2026.
|
UAW board removes secretary- Kalea Hall & Breana Noble The United Auto Workers' International Executive Board has removed Secretary-Treasurer Margaret Mock from overseeing some departments for allegedly abusing her authority and violating union policies, according to a UAW caucus that supported Mock. The United All Workers for Democracy Steering Committee, which endorsed Mock in the 2022 IEB election, issued a statement Wednesday explaining why the IEB voted to remove Mock from overseeing certain departments, including the union's Women’s Department and the Technical, Office, & Professional (TOP) Department. A push to remove Mock from the departments occurred after a report by the UAW’s compliance director showed that Mock "repeatedly abused her authority and violated UAW policies," according to the UAWD. Specifically, the UAWD claims Mock "withheld approval of routine expenditures in an attempted exchange for votes on the IEB" and didn't approve supplies purchased for the UAW's Stand-Up Strike against the automakers last fall. She allegedly also "improperly denied" reimbursement requests and would not approve "legitimate expenditures for ongoing organizing campaigns in a timely manner, risking the loss of NLRB elections and the waste of millions of dollars." In a statement, Mock commended UAW members and her fellow IEB leaders for the record contracts at the Detroit Three last fall and defended actions she has taken in her role. "It saddens me that many do not understand my responsibilities as UAW Secretary Treasurer," Mock said. "I must protect the sacred dues dollars that our members work so hard to earn and that they policies are established by the UAW International Executive Board, and/or by the Special Monitor ordered by the court to oversee the UAW, and/or by federal laws or federal agencies, it is my responsibility when these policies are adhered to. While it saddens me ever further that I get criticized, attacked, and retaliated against because I insist on the policies that are in place be adhered to, I will not waver in enforcing financial policies intended to protect our members sacred due dollars." The International UAW declined to comment. Region 1 Director LaShawn English will lead the Women's Department. Region 1A Director Laura Dickerson will lead the TOP Department. The measures against Mock come as the UAW aggressively is trying to organize non-union vehicle assembly and battery plants across the country in a $40 million campaign. Just this week the union said a majority of workers at Mercedes-Benz's largest plant in the United States have signed authorization cards for UAW representation. Mock was a UAW Members United slate candidate, which was backed by the union's reform-focused UAWD caucus. She was one of several UAW Members United candidates, including UAW President Shawn Fain, to oust incumbents affiliated with the Reuther Administrative Caucus in the union's first-ever direct election of top officials following a years-long corruption scandal. "Secretary-Treasurer Mock’s abuses of authority have directly undermined militant, forward-looking initiatives that the UAW membership voted for, such as building a strong Big 3 contract campaign," the UAWD wrote . "As a democratic caucus, Secretary-Treasurer Mock was endorsed by our membership along with other members of our slate, and we as leadership do not unilaterally make decisions about rescinding endorsements. Our caucus will decide democratically whether further action is necessary." |
Ford again the only Detroit Kalea Hall Ford Motor Co. with its Maverick Hybrid is once again the only Detroit automaker to make the annual "Top Picks" list released Tuesday by Consumer Reports. This is the second time the Dearborn automaker made the cut with its Maverick compact truck. The truck also made the list last year. In 2022, Ford's electric Mustang Mach-E made the list. No Detroit Three vehicles made the list in 2021. Consumer Reports also released its brand rankings, and again, as in past years, not one Detroit-based auto brand ranked in the top 10. European and Japanese brands dominated the list because of their solid reliability. General Motors Co.'s Buick brand placed the highest on the list of 34 at No. 13, followed by Cadillac at No. 14. GM's Chevrolet brand came in at No. 22 and GMC was GM's lowest-ranking brand at No. 31. The Ford Motor Co. Ford brand came in at No. 17 and Lincoln came in at No. 21. Stellantis NV's brands ranked at the bottom of the list with Chrysler at No. 24, Dodge at No. 25, Maserati at No. 27, Alfa Romeo at No. 28 and Jeep dead last at No. 34. For "Cadillac, Ford, Buick, if you look at just the road test score, it's pretty similar to the same road test score average as an Acura or a Toyota," said Jake Fisher, CR’s senior director of automotive testing. "It's not that they're making bad cars that people don't like. They're actually making some very, very good cars. The issue tends to be the reliability, so the reliability kind of drags them down." 2024 Top Picks Consumer Reports, a nonprofit consumer research and advocacy organization, selects the year's top models from hundreds of current vehicles. "Top Picks" vehicles receive the highest scores in CR's ratings. They come standard with key safety features, have high marks for reliability and satisfaction from owners in CR's member surveys. The organization tested more than 250 vehicles and had member survey stats on more than 330,000 vehicles that it used for both "Top Picks" and Brand Rankings. Since plug-in hybrid demand is growing, CR expanded testing and rating for those vehicles. The organization evaluated 13 popular PHEVs and found they are often "quicker, quieter, and more satisfying to drive than the gas-only versions of the same vehicles." CR noted it made "key changes to its scoring for PHEVs. The fuel economy scores are now based on the overall fuel economy from CR’s testing and the EV range, which is based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data, counts as a bonus. CR also added a new PHEV "usability rating" to assess PHEV-specific controls and displays, including electric-only range, and the ease of operating in electric mode. Only three of this year’s "Top Picks" vehicles are repeat winners from the prior year: the Subaru Forester, Toyota Camry Hybrid, and Ford Maverick/Maverick Hybrid. The seven new entrants are the Tesla Model Y, Subaru Crosstrek, Mazda3, Toyota Prius/Prius Prime, Toyota Highlander Hybrid, Toyota RAV4 Prime, and BMW X5/X5 PHEV. The "Top Picks" by category:
The Maverick, Fisher said, "is a nice package," with the hybrid version's 37 miles per gallon and reliability. "In terms of the other Top Picks, what you see is there's a lot of hybrids," he said. "The domestics don't have a lot of hybrids. There it is one electric ... some of the electric vehicles from the domestic automakers are either very expensive or have reliability issues." In a statement, Ford said it "is laser focused on delivering high-quality products and services that our customers deserve. While we are encouraged by Ford Maverick / Maverick Hybrid’s second year in a row as a Top Pick and Ford’s highest ranking since 2016, we continue working to increase vehicle quality and deliver the best experience for our customers." Ford CEO Jim Farley tweeted about the Maverick again making the "Top Picks" list: Brand rankings CR's brand rankings are based on an average Overall Score, which is a combination of road-test scores, predicted reliability, safety ratings and owner satisfaction data. CR runs the vehicles through more than 50 tests at its 327-acre test facility in Connecticut. The tests include acceleration, braking, emergency handling and fuel economy. To be included in brand rankings, CR has to test at least two current models from a company. Lucid, Polestar and Ram aren’t included this year because CR tested only one of their models. For the second consecutive year, German automaker BMW landed in the No. 1 spot, making it the first back-to-back winner since 2017. Japanese automaker Subaru took the second spot as it did last year. Volkswagen AG's Porsche is new to the top 10 this year at No. 3 after placing No. 14 out of 32 brands last year. Other brands in the top 10 were Honda, Lexus, Mini, Kia, Mazda, Toyota and Hyundai. On the domestic side, thanks to reliability improvements Cadillac moved to No. 14 from the No. 24 spot last year, marking its highest ranking in seven years. Buick came in at No. 13 from No. 12 last year. GMC moved from No. 31 to No. 27. Chevrolet moved to No. 22 from No. 23. Ford came in at No. 17, its highest charting since 2016. Lincoln dropped to No. 21 after hitting No. 16 last year. Dodge went from No. 15 last year down to No. 25 this year. Jeep came in dead last this year after coming in second to last last year. Alfa Romeo came in at No. 28 from No. 29 last year and Chrysler came in No. 24 from No. 25. Tesla came in at No. 18 after hitting No. 17 in 2023. GM declined to comment on the "Top Picks" and brand rankings. Stellantis in a statement said it "regularly consults third-party survey information to improve the experiences of our customers. We also compile data from multiple internal sources. We rely more heavily on this information, which may conflict with third-party results, because it is verified and draws from our entire customer base." |
UAW threatens new strike at Breana Noble Kalea Hall The United Auto Workers is threatening another strike next week at Ford Motor Co.'s largest and most profitable plant if local contract issues aren't resolved, the union said in a news release Friday. Nearly 9,000 UAW members at the Kentucky Truck Plant could go on strike at 12:01 a.m. Feb. 23 if local contract issues with UAW Local 862 aren't resolved by then. The plant produces Ford Super Duty pickup trucks, Ford Expedition full-size SUVs and Lincoln Navigator SUVs. The threat comes a day after Ford CEO Jim Farley suggested that the Dearborn automaker is rethinking its U.S. footprint after the union opted to strike at the Kentucky plant last fall, making it the first truck factory hit during the Detroit-based union's targeted strike amid the 2023 contract talks. At the time, the automaker said the plant generated about $25 billion a year, which is a seventh of Ford's 2023 global revenues. The 41-day "stand-up" UAW strike last year cost the automaker $1.7 billion in profit. It's been more than five months since the contract deadline for an agreement with Local 862, according to the union. Issues being discussed center around health and safety, including minimum in-plant nurse staffing levels and ergonomic issues, and skilled trades staffing. UAW Vice President Chuck Browning requested authorization from UAW President Shawn Fain to set the strike deadline. “Negotiations continue," Ford spokesperson Jessica Enoch said in a statement, "and we look forward to reaching an agreement with UAW Local 862 at Kentucky Truck Plant.” Unions are able to strike over local contracts, even with a national contract in place. Such work stoppages aren't unprecedented, but they're not as common as they once were in the early days of the union's activism. Members at UAW Local 1166 representing workers at Stellantis NV's casting plant in Kokomo, Indiana, went on strike over their local agreement in 2022. Farley on Thursday told financial analysts during the the Wolfe Research Global Auto and Auto Tech Conference that Ford's relationship with UAW, which historically had been productive, has changed since the union’s battle with the Dearborn automaker last fall. The automaker builds all of its full-size pickups in UAW-represented plants in the United States and employs approximately 58,000 autoworkers, more than its crosstown rivals. Still, Fain during talks characterized the automakers as "enemies" and said in response to remark by Ford executive chairman Bill Ford Jr. that the union and Ford "being a team to fight other companies are over." At Thursday's event, Farley said: “Our reliance on the UAW turned out to be we were the first truck plant they shut down. And that was a moment for us. Clearly, our relationship has changed … does it have business impact? Yes.” As a result, Farley added, the company would "have to think carefully about our (manufacturing) footprint." Local 862 President Todd Dunn said Farley's comment "doesn't have any bearing" on the union's announcement of a potential strike. Making a threat of a walkout "has happened before," he said. "It's an oddity, or rarity. I've never seen or experienced a local contract strike. My job as president is to facilitate and execute that plan if necessary. (In the fall,) we saw what we were able to do, and the leverage we had. I don't know what would change (members') mind" on the solidarity they expressed then. The warning, said Marick Masters, a management professor at Wayne State University, shows the "bottom-up" and "vigilant" approach that has marked the Fain administration, the first one directly elected by UAW members. "UAW made clear that this is a whole new era of negotiations," he said. "They were going to be more audacious in their terms and demands than they have in the past. Their overall approach is to be more ambitious in their goals and be more willing to strike than in the past." UAW members last year ratified record contracts with the Detroit Three automakers, securing a 27% compounded wage increase through April 2028, cost-of-living adjustments, increased pension and retirement contributions and the right to strike over plant closures. Ford reported a $4.3 billion net income on $176.2 billion in revenue in 2023. A $2 billion effort to cut costs in manufacturing this year is expected to offset increased labor costs and expenses related to product refreshes. Meanwhile, the union has been empowered by its bargaining gains that prompted non-union automakers to raise their workers' pay, cut wage progression timelines and improve benefits. It launched a campaign seeking to double roughly its 146,000 UAW autoworker members by organizing foreign and EV startup plants. "They’re signaling to workers in general that they stand up for their workers at the local level," Masters said. "That’s very important that they not just represent their interests company-wide, but with the kind of concerns they have at the local level, too." Along with Kentucky Truck, there are 19 other open local agreements across Ford, according to the union, along with several open local agreements at General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV. |
Ford Model e COO: 'We don't Breana Noble Detroit — The chief operating officer of Ford Motor Co.'s electric-vehicle division said Wednesday the development of EVs is more than just about environmental concerns — it's a hedge against the potential threat of Chinese automakers in the United States. "That's coming here eventually," Marin Gjaja, Ford Model e's COO, said during a panel on disruptive technology held by the automaker. "So, we better get fit now and better get going on EVs, or we don't have a future." Chinese automakers are dominating their domestic market, making inroads in Europe, and setting up shop in Mexico with eyes on the United States. They led the way in introducing less-expensive EV battery chemistries, and subsidized material prices have helped them to provide low-priced vehicles. The BYD Seagull EV city car starts at roughly $11,000 (78,800 yuan). “I don't know exactly the timing, but I think they're going to end up here,” Gjaja said, “just as the Japanese ended up here. The Koreans ended up here. The Germans ended up here. It's a big market.” Traditional automakers have seen their share of the Chinese luxury market fall from 60% to less than 5%, Gjaja said: “It’s not that they haven’t tried to introduce EVs. They’re just that are far behind. … That’s the scale of the disruption.” EVs in China represent nearly a quarter of its new-car market — close to 7 million vehicles, about 60% of EVs in the world. The United States’ adoption is less than 8%. “The size of the market in China is so big that those players are going to be in a position to go potentially dominate the world, unless we as Ford and other OEMs can respond,” Gjaja said. “Think about all of the capital: the human capital, physical capital, financial capital that’s built into these ecosystems to build vehicles — that is all being massively disrupted, because this technology is progressing so fast.” Ford understands this: It’s partnered with Chinese battery maker Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. to license its technology to make those lower-cost batteries with lithium-iron-phosphate chemistry in south-central Michigan’s Marshall. Ford CEO Jim Farley last week during an earnings call also discussed a low-cost EV platform the Dearborn automaker has been developing for the past two years in hopes of having the flexibility to offer affordable options. Gjaja declined to detail timing on that, but says the goal is a sticker tag in the $25,000 to $30,000 range. With the $7,500 federal subsidy, that would bring the total price closer to $20,000. “We look at the market, and you look at the scale that's required, and the installed base that you get with smaller vehicles, which are going to be where the fastest growth and adoption of EVs will be,” he said, “we need an affordable vehicle platform to be able to compete.” In addition to EV affordability, the industry also is seeing hesitation because of insufficient public chargers, charging speeds and grid reliability concerns, which Gjaja dismissed. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi said that based on the adoption curve of other technologies historically, hitting 1% population adoption is when there begins to be a faster uptake rate. “Typically, what you need is some combination of a reasonable price point, and advanced functionality,” Sacconaghi said. “What we've observed is ... in a new product's evolution, once a product is sort of sufficiently attractive on a price and feature set that it commands 1% penetration, going from 1% to 80% happens really quickly.” Gjaja said given the capital investment required for vehicles and based on results in other countries, he believes for EVs that the tipping point is closer to 10% of new-vehicle sales, though that still represents a drop in the bucket compared with total vehicles on the road. The adoption also depends on region. The San Francisco Bay Area adoption is around 40%, while North Dakota’s is 1%. “There’s not a magic number, if you look across the geographies,” he said. “But I personally feel like at 10%, you’re hitting critical mass where people are like, ‘Oh, I see these charging stations.’ There are enough people buying.” |
US closes 7-year probe into Ford Associated Press U.S. auto safety regulators have closed a seven-year investigation into complaints about power-assisted steering failures in Ford Fusions without seeking additional recalls. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says in documents posted Monday that its testing found only minor steering effort changes if the power-assist failed. It also found a declining failure trend, and a lower failure rate in Fusions that were not recalled. The agency opened the probe in September of 2016 after getting over 500 complaints that the power steering failed suddenly, making the midsize sedans difficult to steer. The probe covered nearly 263,000 Fusions from the 2010 model year. In 2017, the investigation was upgraded to an engineering analysis to look at the scope and frequency of the problem after the agency and Ford got thousands more complaints including allegations of 59 crashes and 13 injuries. But the documents posted Monday said the agency did not find any safety-related defect trend. NHTSA noted that in 2015, Ford recalled nearly 394,000 Fusions and other vehicles in the U.S. from the 2011 to 2013 model years to fix power steering that could shut down due to a steering motor sensor fault. |
UAW has signed majority of Kalea Hall The United Auto Workers has signed up a majority of workers at Volkswagen AG’s Chattanooga, Tenn., plant to join the Detroit-based union, according to a UAW news release sent Tuesday. The news comes less than 60 days after the UAW said 30% of VW workers at the German automaker's only U.S. plant had signed union authorization cards. The facility employs about 5,500 workers and produces the Volkswagen ID.4, Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport, according to VW. Tuesday's news marks the first time the UAW has announced majority support at a non-union auto plant, according to the union. The UAW launched a campaign to organize non-union automakers after negotiating record contracts with Detroit Three automakers last year. Reaching this point at the VW plant is significant for the UAW because of the "shortness of time" since the start of the campaign, said Marick Masters, a business professor at Wayne State University. "I would imagine that, like anything else, that getting the next tranche of workers to sign up will be more difficult," Masters said. "The easiest two tranches are the first two ... but when you try and go above and beyond that, that's when resistance may begin to stiffen and people have more reservations as you get closer to actually holding an election." He added: "The sooner they can move on this and get an election held, once they reach that threshold, the better." Zach Costello, a Volkswagen worker and trainer, said in a statement that "the excitement has been building, and now that we have reached 50%, it is just continuing to grow. New organizers are joining each day spreading our effort to every area of the plant. Just because we are in the South, it does not mean that our work is worth less, that our benefits should be diminished, or that we don’t have rights. All workers should have a voice, and I hope the success that we’re having here is showing workers across the country what is possible.” "A clear majority" of about 4,100 hourly employees at the Chattanooga plant have signed cards to join the UAW, the union said. When 50% of workers sign authorization cards at a plant, the UAW has said it will hold a rally there. At 70% support, the UAW would demand recognition from the company, or request a National Labor Relations Board election. The threshold needed to be able to pursue an NLRB election is 30%. The union has not asked the company to recognize it yet and it has not filed to have an election. “We respect our workers' right to decide the question of union representation," Michael W. Lowder, a VW spokesperson, said in a statement. "And we remain committed to providing accurate information that helps inform them of their rights and choices.” This is not the first time the UAW has pursued an organizing drive at the plant. In 2019, VW workers at the plant voted 51.8% against union representation. There also was a narrow defeat in 2014. “We realized that the working conditions could be a lot better,” said Victor Vaughn, a logistics team member at Volkswagen, in a statement. “And the employees, we don’t have a say in any of the decisions that are going on within the plant. We’re not being recognized as a major resource for the company. We have a very important job, to put a vehicle on the road that our families are buying, that our kids are riding in. We take pride in what we do, but we don’t have a voice in how we operate. That’s why we’re taking the lead.” Other than VW, workers at Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai Motor Co. plants in Alabama have announced public campaigns to join the UAW. |
Ford profit sharing: Here's Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. said Tuesday it will pay profit-sharing bonuses on average of $10,400 to hourly autoworkers in the United States for 2023. The payout is a reflection of a new profit-sharing formula negotiated last year during contract talks with the United Auto Workers. Since the Dearborn automaker no longer reports financial results for North America, a new formula calculates the payout based on the company's global earnings figures, including Ford Credit. Ford recorded an adjusted operating income of $10.4 billion in 2023, which was flat year-over-year. For the first time, temporary employees are eligible for profit sharing. Before the new contract, 2-3% of Ford's approximately 58,000 U.S. autoworkers were temps, though Ford agreed upon ratification to roll over temps with at least three months of experience. Autoworkers can expect to receive the payouts on March. 14. For 2022, Ford workers could receive up to $9,176 in profit sharing. Under the formula used for that, workers received $1,000 for every $1 billion that Ford made in adjusted operating earnings in North America. Last week, crosstown rival General Motors Co. said it would pay its 45,000 eligible hourly workers $12,250 in profit sharing, down from last year's record $12,750. Stellantis NV will report its 2023 financial results and profit sharing for U.S. employees on Feb. 15. |
Ford posts year-over-year Kalea Hall Ford Motor Co.'s January sales increased 4.3% year over year with dealers selling 152,617 vehicles, the Dearborn automaker said Friday. Ford's electric vehicle sales dropped 10.9% from 5,247 to 4,674. Meanwhile, hybrid sales were up a record 42.7% with 11,157 delivered. Sales of internal combustion engine vehicles increased 2.6% to 136,786. Ford's SUVs and trucks saw sales gains of 8.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Car sales dropped 6%. In January 2023, Ford sold 146,356 new vehicles in the United States. The Maverick pickup saw record sales of 12,443 last month, with the hybrid version accounting for nearly half of that total. Maverick Hybrid sales of 6,092 marked an increase of 118% over last year. Ford sold 80,726 trucks and vans in the month. The Transit commercial van's sales were up 40.1% over last year with 14,191 vans sold. Lincoln saw a 20.3% increase in sales, with Corsair up 27.1%, Nautilus up 26.5% and Aviator up 58.3%. Ford's gains came amid mixed results for other automakers that report monthly sales. Honda Motor Co. on Thursday reported its January sales increased 10.3% year over year with 93,210 vehicles sold. Kia Corp. said Thursday it delivered 51,090 vehicles in January, down slightly from last year January's sales of 51,983 and Hyundai Motor Co. said Thursday its January sales dropped 9% from last year with total sales of 47,543 vehicles. Subaru Corp. reported 44,510 vehicle sales for January 2024, a 0.3% increase from January 2023. General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV do not release monthly sales reports. In late January, analysts at Cox Automotive, an automotive services provider, estimated total new-vehicle sales in the first month of the year would come in at 1.08 million, below their previous forecast of 1.15 million, but up from year-ago levels. “January is normally one of the slowest months for vehicle sales, as the December hangover and cold weather keep car and truck shoppers from wandering dealer lots,” said Charlie Chesbrough, senior economist at Cox Automotive, in a statement. “This January will be no exception, compounded by a few large storms and deep freezes across the country, which likely had an additional negative impact on sales. Unlike last year, though, available inventory and incentives will not be a problem.” Cox expects 2024's total sales volume will be nearly 15.7 million, up slightly from 15.5 million in 2023.
|
UAW President: If corporations Breana Noble United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain on Monday said government should make up for pensions if corporations won't pay for them, downplayed security along the southern border and called for a just transition to electric vehicles. Fain's remarks came during the union's National Community Action Program Conference in Washington, D.C. Hundreds of members have gathered to discuss policy priorities and partake in workshops focused on activism during this year's presidential election. The UAW has yet to endorse a candidate even as other major unions have backed President Joe Biden, but Fain has suggested an endorsement could come as early as this week. "We have to take the issues that matter to the working class and poor, and we have to make our political leaders stand up with us," Fain said during his opening remarks. "Our message in doing this is simple: Support our cause, or you will not get our endorsement." Fain described political activism as an extension of the gains the union obtained this fall in its new contracts with the Detroit Three automakers. The new pacts delivered record wage hikes, resumed cost-of-living adjustments, obtained improvements to retirement packages and other benefits and secured billions of dollars in investments. The union, however, was unsuccessful in delivering its demand to secure pensions and post-retirement health care for all 146,000 autoworkers. Those hired after 2007 have 401(k)s with matching contributions that were upped in the latest round of negotiations. Analysts have estimated the union's demand would cost billions of dollars. "We're going to keep pushing for this in the next round of negotiations," Fain said. "But we're thinking even bigger, and we're not going to wait until 2028. Either the Big Three guarantee retirement security for workers who give their lives to these companies or an even bigger player does: the federal government." He criticized identity politics as divisive contributors that distract from the focus on billionaires and "corporate greed." The idea of border security being a major issue in this year's election, he said, is "a joke." "They try to divide us nationally by nationality," Fain said. "Right now, we have millions of people being told that the biggest threat to their livelihood is migrants coming over the border. The threat we face at the border isn't from the migrants. It's from the billionaires and the politicians getting working people to point the finger at one another, when in reality, we're all on the same side of the war against the working class." He likened the situation to his own grandparents who crossed "state lines instead of federal lines" to become autoworkers and join the UAW: "They went somewhere else to find a better life. That's all these people are trying to do." Fain also emphasized the need for a just transition to cleaner energy vehicles. He said the union must play a leading role in that, even as the UAW's own reports suggest the move to EVs could risk jobs. "We have to, as a union, lead in the area of environmental safety," Fain said. "It does no good to bargain for another dollar an hour or another week's vacation, if on the vacation you take you can't swim in the lake, because it's dirty, and you can't breathe clean air." |
Ford Kicks Off 2024 By Story by Christopher Smith The 2023 recall leader aims to keep the title thanks to A-pillar trim that could fly off while driving. It's January 24, and Ford is already almost one-third the way to all the recalls it had last year. That's saying something, seeing as how Ford was the most-recalled automaker in 2023 by a wide margin. A total of5.6 million Blue Oval vehicles in the US were potentially affected by some issue, and now, 1.8 million Explorers in the States have trim pieces that could come off while driving. That number expands to 2.2 million vehicles globally, according to Automotive News, and it all stems from a simple problem. Recall number 24V-031 from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) states that "some of the exterior A-pillar applique trim clip attachments are not properly engaged due to improper assembly or repair." The issue affects Explorers from the 2011 through 2019 model years, and as you can probably guess, clips that "are not properly engaged" can lead to the trim piece flying off. Ford states there have been no accidents or injuries resulting from this failure. However, there appear to be a good deal of incident reports. Perusing a chronology report on the recall, Ford identifies 568 Vehicle Online Questionnaire reports and 14,337 warranty reports of the exterior A-pillar trim either detached or missing. Curiously, the report states that Ford conducted an initial investigation on its own back in 2018 at the request of the NHTSA. It was deemed to be "not an unreasonable risk to safety due to the low mass/geometry of the part with NHTSA alignment." That apparently changed in February 2023 when NHTSA opened a preliminary investigation of its own into the problem, ultimately deciding that yes, plastic parts flying off a car could be a safety hazard to other drivers on the road. Total Recall:
Fortunately, the fix is very simple. Ford dealers will inspect the Explorer's A-pillar trim and repair or replace if it's not securely fastened. Owner notification will begin in March, but folks with concerns can call Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332 and reference Ford recall 24S02 for more information.
|
Ford cuts F-150 Lightning output, Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s decision to reduce all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup production is affecting 1,400 jobs in Dearborn. Meanwhile, it's hiring nearly 900 people in Wayne for assembly of Bronco SUVs and Ranger midsize trucks. The Dearborn automaker in a Friday news release said it’s seeking to balance production to meet customer demand. It says it expects growth for Lightning sales this year, but it’s less than previously anticipated. The production cut is the latest pullback by the automaker in the EV space. “We are taking advantage of our manufacturing flexibility to offer customers choices while balancing our growth and profitability. Customers love the F-150 Lightning, America's best-selling EV pickup,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a statement. “We see a bright future for electric vehicles for specific consumers, especially with our upcoming digitally advanced EVs and access to Tesla's charging network beginning this quarter." The Rouge Electric Vehicle Center will become a one-shift operation effective April 1. Roughly 700 affected employees will transfer to the Bronco and Ranger factory, Michigan Assembly Plant off Michigan Avenue in Wayne. Ford is adding a 1,600-person third crew at Michigan Assembly in preparation for the launches of the new Ranger and off-road-focused Ranger Raptor. The plant will produce vehicles seven days a week instead of five with three crews working two shifts. Others affected by the Lightning production cut will be placed in roles at the Rouge Complex or other facilities in southeast Michigan, according to the company. Anyone else will be able to take advantage of the Special Retirement Incentive Program available this year through the new United Auto Workers contract. Depending on the number of employees who apply for the buyout, a few dozen workers at component plants supporting Lightning production could be affected. Ford says it would provide placements for those employees within southeast Michigan, too. Lightning sales last year were up 55%, making it the country's best-selling all-electric pickup. Ford implemented a several thousand-dollar price drop in July. In January 2022, Ford announced plans to double Lightning production to 150,000 vehicles per year. The Rouge Electric Vehicle Center was down for six weeks last summer to expand capacity. Ford in October said it was cutting $12 billion in planned EV investment as the growth in adoption slows. That included almost halving the size of its planned west Michigan battery plant in Marshall and delaying by a year the launch of production at one of its two battery plants in Kentucky with SK On. The automaker also cut back production in Mexico of the Mustang Mach-E SUV and has decreased requirements for dealers to be EV certified in the coming years. |
FCC chair asks automakers Associated Press Detroit — The top U.S. telecommunications regulator is asking automakers how they plan to protect people from being stalked or harassed by partners who have access to vehicle location and other data. In a letter sent Thursday to nine large automakers, Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel asks for details about connected car systems and plans to support people who have been harassed by domestic abusers. “No survivor of domestic violence and abuse should have to choose between giving up their car and allowing themselves to be stalked and harmed by those who can access its data and connectivity,” she said in a statement. Nearly all new vehicles have convenience features that use telecommunications to find cars in parking lots, start the engine remotely, and even connect with emergency responders, Rosenworcel's letter said. “These features rely on wireless connectivity and location data that in the wrong hands can be used to harm partners in abusive relationships,” she wrote. The letter asks automakers for details about their connected services and whether they have policies in place to remove access to connected apps and other features if a request is made by someone who is being abused. Rosenworcel asks if the companies remove access even from someone whose name is on the vehicle's title. Letters were sent to top executives at General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Honda Motor Co., Hyundai Motor Co., Mercedes-Benz Group, Nissan Motor Co., Stellantis NV, Tesla Inc. and Toyota Motor Corp. Similar letters also went to wireless voice providers, the commission said. Messages were left Thursday seeking comment from the automakers. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a large trade association, said in a statement that misuse of connected vehicle technology to stalk or harass people is not acceptable. "The industry is considering how to best broaden federal or state policies and other protections to help prevent these incidents,” the statement said. The association has raised the issue with regulators previously, the group said. Rosenworcel's letter to automakers said it came after a story last week in the New York Times about how connected cars are being weaponized in abusive relationships. |
Tesla is raising factory worker Associated Press Detroit – Factory workers at Tesla have been told to expect pay raises this year, a move that comes as the United Auto Workers union tries to organize the electric vehicle maker's U.S. plants. The UAW said Thursday that Tesla workers have told the union about company statements on the raises, which did not give details about the size of the increases. After winning strong contracts with Detroit's three automakers last year, the union has embarked on an effort to organize all nonunion auto plants in the U.S., including Tesla's assembly and battery factories in Texas, California and Nevada. The Tesla raises come after nearly all companies with nonunion auto plants announced worker pay increases shortly after the UAW contracts were ratified. The UAW said its organizing drive will target more than a dozen U.S. plants run by Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Subaru, Mazda, Volkswagen, Mercedes, BMW and Volvo. Tesla also is on the list, along with EV startups Rivian and Lucid. UAW President Shawn Fain has called the raises at nonunion automakers the “UAW bump," saying that they were given in an effort to thwart union organizing efforts. “As great as these raises are, they still fall far short of what the companies can afford and what autoworkers are worth,” Fain said in a statement Thursday. A message was left Thursday seeking comment from Tesla, which is based in Austin, Texas. Tesla production workers, material handlers and quality inspectors will get a “market adjustment” pay raise, according to Bloomberg News, which reported the raises early Thursday. The UAW said this week that over 30% of workers at a Mercedes-Benz plant near Tuscaloosa, Alabama, have signed cards authorizing a vote on union representation. The action at Mercedes comes after more than 1,000 workers at Volkswagen’s Tennessee factory signed similar cards authorizing a vote. The union says its strategy includes calling for an election at factories when about 70% of the workers sign up. A union can seek an election run by the National Labor Relations Board once a majority of workers support it. The UAW pacts with General Motors, Ford and Jeep maker Stellantis include 25% pay raises by the time the contracts end in April of 2028. With cost-of-living increases, workers will see about 33% in raises for a top assembly wage of $42 per hour, plus annual profit sharing, the union said. Tesla also has found itself locked in an increasingly bitter dispute with union workers in Sweden and neighboring countries. The electric car maker’s CEO Elon Musk is staunchly anti-union. |
Ford Recalls 1.0L EcoBoost Story by Anthony Alaniz US regulators are also investigating Ford’s 2.7- and 3.0-liter EcoBoost engines. Not even Ford's nifty 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine could escape the regulatory eye of the US government. Ford has issued a recall for certain 2018-2022 EcoSport and 2016-2018 Focus models equipped with the three-cylinder engine and 6F15 automatic transmission. They could suffer from a loss of engine oil pressure due to a defect with the oil pump drive belt tensioner arm. According to the recall notice, the belt tensioner arm may fracture because the retention caulk joint isn’t robust enough to withstand engine vibrations. If this happens, the tensioner could separate from the backing plate and cause the belt to degrade by losing teeth. If this happens, the engine might experience a loss of oil pressure, which could damage and seize the engine. Drivers might experience a loss of engine and braking power, which could lead to an accident. Ford is aware of one crash allegedly related to this issue that injured two but is unaware of any fatalities. The recall arrives after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an investigation into nearly a quarter-million EcoSport crossovers for reports of alleged engine failure in 2018-2021 models in September. Ford’s EcoBoost engines have been under scrutiny since 2022 when NHTSA began investigating issues with the Bronco. In October, the federal agency expanded its “catastrophic engine failure probe” to 700,000 Ford and Lincoln vehicles. It’s now looking at the 2.7-liter and 3.0-liter EcoBoost engines that power the Edge, Explorer, F-150, Lincoln Nautilus, and Lincoln Aviator models. The recall affects 139,790 EcoSport and Focus models, two vehicles the automaker no longer offers in the US. Last year saw Ford retain the unwanted title of being the most recalled automaker, with 54 affecting 5.6 million vehicles. That’s down from 68 recalls for 8.5 million cars in 2022. |
Alabama Mercedes-Benz Breana Noble More than 30% of workers at Mercedes-Benz's plant in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, have signed United Auto Workers authorization cards, the second transplant factory to hit the threshold, the union said on Wednesday. Obtaining 30% support is legally what workers need to be able to pursue a National Labor Relations Board election to obtain union representation with a majority vote. The UAW's strategy calls for announcing a public campaign at a plant once it hits that threshold. It says it will demand that the company voluntarily recognize the union once 70% of workers sign online authorization cards or else pursue an NLRB election. The Tuscaloosa plant is the second to reach the 30% threshold since the Detroit-based union in November formally launched its campaign to organize foreign-owned and electric-vehicle maker assembly plants. It's seeking to build off the momentum of record labor contracts with the Detroit Three automakers to roughly double the union's 146,000 automotive members. Volkswagen AG's plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, was the first plant where 30% of workers signed cards one month ago. A request for comment was sent to a Mercedes-Benz Group representative on Wednesday afternoon. The Tuscaloosa plant employs approximately 6,300 workers, according to its web page. It produces SUVs: the GLE, GLE coupé and GLS model series, including the Mercedes-Maybach GLS. It also assembles the all-electric EQS SUV and EQE. A previous attempt to organize the plant fizzled out in 2014 after years of seeking to gain support. In a news release, the union highlighted the German automaker's $156 billion in profits over the last decade, including a 200% jump over the past three years. It says U.S. workers' wages have stagnated as Mercedes vehicles' prices rose 31% since 2020. “Back in the day, you could get by on the pay here,” Derrick Todd, an online quality team member who’s been at Mercedes since 2005, said in a statement provided by the union. “We topped out in two years. Now some people go through a temp agency for years before they even get on the pay scale. Year after year, the company says they’ve got record profits and sales, but our pay doesn’t keep up. It’s time to set things right. It’s time that we had our voice heard.” |
Safety Alert: Ford Initiates Major Story by Henrik Rothen Ford has announced a recall of over 130,000 vehicles, citing a critical issue that could potentially lead to increased crash risks. This precautionary step is in response to a discovered fault in the vehicles' oil pressure system. Affected Models and Risk Factors The recall specifically targets two models: the Ford Focus (years 2016 to 2018) and the Ford EcoSport (years 2018 to 2022). The concern revolves around the possibility of the oil pump drive belt or the drive belt tensioner failing. Such a failure could result in a loss of engine oil pressure. According to the details shared by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the loss of oil pressure might lead to an engine stall and a subsequent reduction in power-breaking assist – a scenario that significantly heightens the risk of accidents. Scope and Solution Approximately 139,730 vehicles are potentially impacted by this issue. Ford, committed to customer safety, has arranged for the replacement of the oil pump tensioner assembly and the oil pump drive belt at no cost to vehicle owners. This measure aims to address and rectify the identified risk efficiently. Customer Guidance and Contact Information Ford plans to initiate owner notifications about the safety risk on February 13, with a follow-up notice once the necessary remedy parts are available. Vehicle owners can reach out to Ford's customer service at 1-866-436-7332 for assistance and further information. The recall is officially identified as number 23S64. |
Detroit Three to skip Breana Noble, Kalea Hall The Detroit Three automakers say they are passing on advertising at the 2024 Super Bowl, even with their hometown team having its best chance at winning the NFL title in years. Pricing for Super Bowl LVIII set to air Feb. 11 on CBS is said to be around $7 million for a 30-second spot, according to Ad Age. Last year, 115.1 million viewers tuned into watch the Kansas City Chiefs defeat the Philadelphia Eagles. The playoffs will determine who plays in this year's game outside Las Vegas. The Detroit Lions are their division's champions this season. The auto industry in 2023 saw increased sales as supply-chain issues resolved and pent-up demand from the pandemic was satisfied. In 2024, that sales growth is expected to moderate as interest rates remain high, and customers are looking for incentives to make a purchase. That means squeezed profit margins unless the companies cut costs. Skipping the super Bowl is Stellantis NV's latest move to adjust its marketing spending. The company this week pointed to challenging market conditions in its decision to evaluate its appearance at auto shows on a case-by-case basis. Stellantis won't attend next month's Chicago Auto Show "With a continued focus on preserving business fundamentals to mitigate the impact of a challenging U.S. automotive market, we are evaluating our business needs and will take the appropriate decisions to protect our North America operations and the Company," according to a statement sent by spokesperson Diane Morgan. "In light of this assessment, we will not be participating in the Big Game this year." Stellantis aired two commercials during last year's game. One promoted the Jeep 4xe plug-in hybrids with a new version of the "Electric Boogie." The second premiered the all-electric Ram 1500 REV. Five days later, the automaker closed reservations for the truck that'll launch in the fourth quarter. The automaker's Super Bowl ads in the past have delivered buzz. In 2020, the commercial with actor Bill Murray and a Jeep Gladiator spoofing the "Groundhog Day" film topped USA Today's Ad Meter. Eminem introduced the Chrysler 200 in a 2011 Super Bowl ad that also focused on the revitalization of Detroit. General Motors Co. in recent years has used the Super Bowl to sell its EV future, though it isn't doing so this year. Last year, the automaker brought in actor Will Ferrell to promote its EVs and a new partnership it had with the streaming service Netflix. The automaker also had Ferrell appear in a 2021 ad called "No way, Norway," where Ferrell goes on a mission to get back at Norway for selling more EVs. "We continually evaluate our media strategies," GM spokesperson Arianna Kughn said in a statement, "to ensure they align with our business priorities." Ford hasn't aired a Super Bowl ad in several years, and it won't again in 2024, said spokesperson Mike Levine, referring to a previous statement from CEO Jim Farley: "If you ever see Ford Motor Co. doing a Super Bowl ad on our electric vehicles, sell the stock." |
Ford posts best sales year since Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose 7.1% in 2023 compared to 2022, the Dearborn automaker said Thursday, marking its best results since 2020. The Blue Oval was just shy of selling 2 million vehicles last year compared to 1.86 million in 2022. It maintained its position as the No. 2 seller of electric vehicles behind Tesla Inc., though its 72,608 EV sales rose 18% compared to 126% in 2022 over 2021 — hence, Ford's decision to cut $12 billion in planned EV investment as it anticipates the buildout of a charging network that will open the way for more consumer adoption. Despite inflationary pressures, improved production in 2023 as supply-chain challenges were resolved from 2022 and pent-up demand stemming from the pandemic supported growth in vehicle sales last year. Automotive services resource Cox Automotive Inc. estimated that 15.5 million vehicles were sold in 2023. Ford sold 192,343 vehicles in December, up 7.3% year-over-year. Fourth-quarter sales of 487,840 were up 0.8%. Ford hybrid vehicle sales were up 25% on record annual sales. For a 47th year in a row, the F-Series trucks were the top-selling trucks, up 15% in 2023, with 750,789 pickups. That includes the all-electric Lightning, whose sales rose 55% to 24,165. Hybrid truck sales were up 41%. General Motors Co. sold 555,148 Chevrolet Silverados, though the Detroit automaker sold an additional 295,737 full-size trucks with the GMC Sierra. Stellantis NV's Ram sold 444,926 pickups. Ford's other EVs also saw sales increase and a record fourth quarter for EV sales. The Mustang Mach-E's deliveries rose 3.3% to 40,771 in 2023, and the E-Transit commercial van was up 18% to 7,672. The Transit van sales totaled 129,009, up 30%, leading its top-selling commercial van lineup for a 45th year. “In a year of challenges, from a labor strike to supply issues, our amazing lineup of gas, electric and hybrid vehicles and our fantastic dealers delivered solid growth and momentum. We have the products that customers want,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a statement. “I am especially proud Ford remained the No. 2 EV brand in America and our next-gen, digitally advanced new EVs are on the way. "Now we are spring-loaded for 2024 with new versions coming of our most popular trucks and SUVs, a full year of new Super Duty and Mustang, and a big year for Lincoln.” Sales of Lincoln, Ford's luxury brand, fell 2% in 2023, but were up 8.8% in the fourth quarter. Bronco SUV sales declined 9.7% to 105,665 last year, under the Jeep Wrangler's 156,581 sales, which also were down. The smaller Bronco Sport supplied an additional 127,476 sales, which were up 28%. Explorer, one of the most popular Ford brand SUVs, saw sales fall 10% for the year, but a new Explorer is coming this year. Expedition sales were up 18% for the year. In the truck segment, Ranger sales were down 43% in 2023, while sales of the popular Maverick rose almost 27%. More than half of Maverick sales were hybrids. |
The Year Ahead: Politics in 2024 Emily Landau 1. Justin Trudeau will face new challengers—both within his party and beyond Many political insiders are predicting a federal election in 2024. But after nine years in power and three election wins, the bloom is off the rose for Justin Trudeau, who’s staring down generation-high interest rates, a dire housing crisis and his lowest approval ratings ever. A recent Angus Reid poll suggests most Canadians, including almost half of Liberal respondents, think he should step down before the next election; potential successors include Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly and former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney, who’s already floated the idea of a leadership run. Meanwhile, Trudeau’s Conservative counterpart, Pierre Poilievre, will keep picking up popularity as he promises to lower the cost of living and calls for an end to carbon taxes. The CPC also stands to benefit from a redrawn federal electoral map, set to take effect in April. 2. The Liberals will prepare for a Trump victory in the U.S. MSNBC is prepping its electoral map, the New York Times is dusting off its prediction needle and all eyes are on America as the Democrats prepare to square off against an as-yet-unknown Republican adversary. Should Donald Trump or another ultra-conservative prospect win in November, Canada might expect an influx of political refugees, increased economic and diplomatic isolationism and a rise in far-right movements on home soil. Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly has said the Trudeau government is readying a game plan for every scenario. 3. Danielle Smith will try to create an Alberta pension plan Smith won the Alberta premiership last spring on a platform powered by anti-federalist sentiment. One of her top promises was that Alberta would pull out of the Canadian Pension Plan and create its own, with lower contributions and higher returns. Support is growing for the idea, and Smith plans to hold a referendum next year. A report commissioned by the province suggests that if it defects, it’s entitled to 53 per cent of the CPP’s $375 billion in assets—a figure disputed by the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, which estimates the province would get 16 per cent, and economist Trevor Tombe, who puts the number between 20 and 25 per cent. 4. LGBTQ+ rights will be an election issue In 2023, both New Brunswick and Saskatchewan tabled legislation requiring schools to receive parental consent before allowing students to use their preferred name or gender identity at school. These moves are part of a burgeoning movement called “parental rights,” which has received considerable pushback from students, parents and educators who claim that kids should be free to make identity choices without their parents’ involvement. Both provinces have elections scheduled for October, and the issue will no doubt be a litmus test for voters’ enthusiasm for—or abhorrence of—social conservatism. 5. The Greenbelt will haunt Doug Ford Ontario’s premier spent much of 2023 touting the Greenbelt expansion, an ambitious plan that would allow urban development on a ribbon of the province’s pristine farmland. After months of outcry from farmers and conservationists, allegations that he favoured certain developers and a damning report from Ontario’s auditor general, Ford walked back the deal. But he’s not off the hook yet: the RCMP has launched a probe into the deal and allegations of corruption. (Ford has denied any criminal activity took place and promised to co-operate with the investigation.) In a symbolic gesture of regret, his government is introducing laws to ensure any further Greenbelt changes will occur via the legislature rather than regulations. 6. New policies will detect Pretendians Last year, several notable Canadians were accused of feigning or fudging their Indigenous identity—alleged Pretendians included former judge Mary-Ellen Turpel-Lafond, ex–Memorial University president Vianne Timmons and folk music icon Buffy Sainte-Marie. To deter future fakers, a number of universities are implementing Indigenous identity verification systems for future hires, with requirements such as signed affidavits, government ID and references from family and Elders. This year, that practice will likely extend to school boards (the Toronto District School Board says it’s developing new procedures for verification) and the private sector (the Saskatchewan NDP is pushing for a policy requiring employers to independently confirm Indigenous identity claims).
7. Pharmacare could splinter a fragile political alliance In 2022, the federal NDP and Liberals entered into a shaky coalition: in exchange for the NDP’s support, the Liberals agreed to push for affordable housing and a universal pharmacare program. A year and a half later, the Libs hadn’t come through on the pharmacare promise, and the NDP was threatening to pull its support unless the party made good. By the end of 2023, the parties had confirmed that the legislation will be tabled by March. A new report suggests that a single-payer drug plan will cost the government $11 billion in its first year, but create net savings of up to $1.4 billion for the economy, since the feds will be able to negotiate on bulk drug prices. 8. Canada will welcome half a million immigrants The government plans to welcome 485,000 new permanent residents this year—roughly 1.2 per cent of the current population—and 500,000 in both 2025 and 2026. The goal is to boost the economy, fill labour shortages and compensate for Canada’s lagging fertility rate. The problem, critics say, is that Canada doesn’t have the housing, public resources or resettlement services to absorb that many newcomers in such a short period of time. But Immigration Minister Marc Miller insists that the influx of new Canadians is essential to solve deeply entrenched problems like the housing crisis: the government’s intention is to bring in the kinds of skilled workers who can build new housing stock. 9. Quebec will court Francophone newcomers Under the Canada-Quebec Accord, established in 1991, Quebec sets its own immigration targets. This year, that means 60,000 new international students and economic migrants—but, as part of Premier François Legault’s aggressive francophone-first policy, all temporary foreign workers will have to pass a French-language exam before they’re admitted. This is in keeping with the government’s goal of having 89 per cent of the Quebec workforce qualify as French-language speakers (a huge bump from the 2023 goal of 66 per cent). The move has been controversial in Quebec, where business owners say the new requirements will add more barriers to hiring. 10. The federal government will pay for its past Last summer, a federal judge approved the largest class-action settlement in Canadian history: a whopping $23.4 billion to compensate some 300,000 Indigenous children and families who were victims of Canada’s discriminatory child welfare system. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruled that, going back to 1991, the claimants in the case were adversely affected by racist government policies and, in some cases, denied services altogether in areas like health care and education. Each claimant is entitled to $40,000 plus interest, and payments will start rolling out this year. On top of that, the government has also agreed to set aside an additional $20 billion for long-term child welfare reform.
|
Ford Is The Most Recalled Ford is the most recalled brand for the third straight year, according to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. By: Christopher Smith According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) through December 20, Ford has issued 54 recalls potentially affecting 5,692,135 vehicles in 2023, the most of any automaker. This year marks the third year in a row Ford has held the top spot for recalls in the United States. Going strictly by vehicles affected, Ford had nearly twice as many as second-place Kia at 3 million, the bulk of which came through a single recall for leaking brake fluid leading to a fire risk. If you go by total recalls, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles USA was second to Ford with 45, affecting 2.7 million cars. BMW had 29 recalls, Mercedes-Benz had 27, and Nissan rounds out the top five for automakers at 22. Ford's numbers are down from 68 recalls affecting 8.5 million cars in 2022 but it's still way ahead of other automakers. Things have improved roughly 30 percent over last year per Ford, which offered the following statement to Motor1: "We’re constantly working to improve vehicle quality and deliver the best experience for our customers. Voluntary recalls are one of the ways we proactively protect customers from experiencing an issue. Our initial quality is improving and customers with our latest vehicles are benefiting from it. Compared with 2022, about 30% fewer Ford customers were affected by safety related recalls in 2023." The surprise recall story for 2023 is actually Volkswagen. You may recall the German brand holding the number two spot behind Ford for 2022, clocking 45 recalls affecting 1 million vehicles. Imagine our surprise when VW didn't show up on NHTSA's pie chart for 2023, which only shows 12 brands. We thought perhaps data wasn't available, but searching specifically for the company reveals a total of 18 recalls for 332,700 cars. That's considerably lower than last year. We asked VW about the year-over-year improvement. A spokesperson offered the following statement to Motor1: "Volkswagen Group of America has been working diligently to improve the quality of its vehicles, which in turn reduces the potential for recalls. Recently, quality problems have been reduced significantly, warranty claims are at a historical low and our regional Quality Testing and Validation program is showing positive results." While Ford still leads for recalls, Tesla takes the dubious honor of having the largest single recall for automakers in 2023 over its Autopilot driver-assist system. This one is likely fresh in your memory as it occurred in early December, affecting 2,031,220 vehicles. That's pretty close to every Tesla the company built for the US market, but it likely won't be a costly recall for the automaker. NHTSA determined that Autopilot doesn't do enough to prevent misuse, which Tesla plans to remedy with an over-the-air software update. With a few days left in 2023, it's always possible a big recall could crop up. If that happens, we'll certainly update the post. But with folks headed out for extended holiday breaks, don't hold your breath. |
20 years of Dodge muscle comes DAVID KENNEDY After Dec. 22, 2023, output of the Dodge Charger and Challenger muscle cars and the Chrysler 300 sedan ends An eight-year run for the boxy sedan with undersized windows and an unmistakable oversized grille would have been enough for Stellantis designer Ralph Gilles to call the Chrysler 300 a success. Yet nearly 20 years after workers at Brampton Assembly Plant built the first 300 in early 2004, production of the car continues to hum along northwest of Toronto, even if it’s more a trickle than a flood. “It has exceeded all of our expectations,” and to this day, the “performance numbers it puts down are fantastic,” said Gilles, chief design officer at Stellantis, who was instrumental in bringing the 300 to life. “There were a lot of battles behind the car [for] a lot of our era. The company’s transitioned, yet it’s a constant,” he told Automotive News Canada. Dodge teases next-generation Charger in U.S. holiday ad Gilles provided no details about what Chrysler plans to roll out, but said a new vehicle is on deck. “I don’t think people are going to say it’s a new 300 per se, but they will say it’s a fantastic new Chrysler,” he said. After nearly 20 years of the 300, Charger and Challenger, the Brampton plant will be down for up to two years for retooling. WHAT’S NEXT FOR BRAMPTON? In the spring of 2022, Stellantis pledged to transition the plant to build electrified vehicles, ending months of uncertainty about Brampton as production of the three cars comes to an end. “That put ease in our members because we didn’t know what was going on, and now, we have a clear path,” said Unifor’s Beato. The two-year timeline will be a long haul for members, he said. But given the rapid progress of some other recent EV retooling projects — namely the short turnaround of General Motors’ CAMI Assembly Plant in Ingersoll, Ont. — the union is optimistic that Stellantis will be able to reduce the downtime. The Brampton plant is slated to build the new Jeep Compass crossover in both gasoline and battery-electric variants when it reopens in late 2025. Among other improvements, the plant will have a new paint shop, tandem stamping lines and new body-in-white and underbody spaces, Beato said. Members have logged some “historic memories” over the past 20 years, he said. But with plenty of fans of the Jeep brand on the line, excitement is building for the new era. “This new retool and transition for our plant into the EV future will support our members and their families for generations to come as well.” |
Ontario has announced big
|
Environmental groups demand Breana Noble A group of 10 environmentalist organizations are calling on General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. to distance themselves from the lobby group Automotive Alliance for Innovation, which has voiced opposition to proposed federal standards that would demand a 56% reduction in emissions from model years 2027 to 2032. In a letter sent to GM CEO Mary Barra, Ford CEO Jim Farley and other executives, the organizations that include the Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters and Center for Biological Diversity demand the companies break off connections with the trade association that represents most major automakers selling vehicles in the United States. The request comes as GM and Ford have pulled back on electric-vehicle investment plans, decreasing battery-plant project sizes, delaying EV launches and postponing production targets. Demand for EVs has been less than expected, the companies say, even though EV sales are increasing. They're just not increasing at as fast as a rate as they once were as charging station availability, charging speeds, affordability and grid reliability remain obstacles to mass adoption. "GM and Ford: Don't let AAI’s anti-EV lobbyists speak for you," the environmentalist groups wrote. "Unless you distance yourselves from the AAI and express clear support of the clean cars standards, your companies are complicit in blocking progress on EVs." The other signatories were Ekō, Coltura, the Electric Vehicle Association, GreenLatinos, Interfaith Power & Light, Public Citizen and The Sunrise Project The standards could push automakers to ensure more than two-thirds of their U.S. sales are EVs. The alliance, though, has expressed concerns that requiring automakers to spend more on reducing emissions will direct investments into improving gas engines and away from EVs to meet federal standards if EV demand isn't there. AAI CEO John Bozzella was unavailable to respond to the letter on Wednesday while representing light-duty manufacturers at a federal working group on EV transition policies hosted by U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm and U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. A spokesperson directed The Detroit News to a post on Bozzella's LinkedIn on Monday. "My mantra: the future is electric. This will happen," he wrote. "But … the auto industry, policymakers and everyone in between needs a realistic vision of success when it comes to automotive electrification and a real partnership to make this happen." Missing emissions standards can subject automakers to fines or require that hey purchase credits from competitors. Ford, GM and Stellantis NV are the worst-performing of major automakers for fuel economy and carbon emissions in the EPA's most recent Automotive Trends Report. “Our commitments and investments in an all-electric future place GM in an excellent position to contribute to the Administration’s goals," the automaker said in a statement sent by spoksperson Bill Grotz. "To best ensure industry can successfully achieve the transition to electrification, we encourage coordination across the U.S. federal government and with (the California Air Resources Board), to include alignment on EV regulatory ratings and vehicle class definitions.” GM last week said it's still planning to be all-electric by 2035. Supply-chain issues resulted in the automaker selling fewer EVs than hoped this year, Barra said Wednesday before the Economic Club of Washington, D.C. The Detroit News reported late last month, though, that GM was considering the return of hybrids in North America. It withdrew its target of 400,000 production EVs by the first half of 2024; put off the launches of the Chevrolet Equinox EV and the Silverado RST for retail customers and the GMC Sierra EV Denali; postponed launching more capacity for the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra EVs; and nixed an affordable EV program with Honda Motor Co. Ltd. Ford did not immediately have comment on the letter, but a spokesperson directed The Detroit News to its written comments to the EPA on the proposed standards. "Ford is all-in on electrification. ... As we begin the work of bringing EVs to scale here in the U.S. and globally, we are creating new jobs, supporting communities, and growing our business in ways that are good for people and the planet. Just like we did 120 years ago when we put the world on wheels, we are shaping the future of mobility — one that’s inclusive, equitable, and sustainable." The Dearborn automaker reported record U.S. EV sales in November. Still, it has cut $12 billion in planned EV investments. That includes nearly halving the battery plant it's building in west Michigan's Marshall and delaying the launch of one of two joint-venture battery plants it's building in Kentucky with South Korean battery manufacturer SK On. It's also reducing production volumes of EV models. |
Ford Executive Doug Field Buys By Brett Foote In the midst of a major executive shakeup as it continues to execute its Ford+ plan for the future, one of The Blue Oval’s many hires originating from tech giants was Doug Field, former Apple VP of special products, who was hired to be Ford’s chief advanced technology and embedded systems officer back in September 2021. Now, Field has reportedly made a major Ford stock purchase that totals a whopping $2 million, according to Barron’s. According to a regulatory filing, that purchase totaled 182,000 shares of Ford stock, which Field acquired at an average cost of $11.05 per share – accounting for a total of around $2 million. It also brings Field’s total ownership of Ford stock up to 720,000 shares (not including restricted stock units), though this latest purchase appears to be the executive’s first open-market acquisition – at least in terms of The Blue Oval’s stock. Back in December 2022, the automaker’s board’s compensation committee recommended that Field hold three times his base salary of $500,000 in Ford stock, though he has far exceeded that number now. As such, it seems as if Field is bullish on the current state of that stock, which has dropped by around 18 percent over the past year largely due to slow EV sales growth and soaring interest rates. Regardless, large stock purchases by Ford executives are certainly nothing new, as CEO Jim Farley bought $1 million dollars worth of shares back in May 2020 – which, at the time, was the largest open-market share purchase by a Ford executive in at least the past 10 years. A few months later, executive chairman Bill Ford bought $2 million dollars worth of Ford stock as well, all while other auto execs were busy selling off shares. |
Ford decreasing F-150 Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. is decreasing production of its all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck after the new year in Dearborn, according to a report from Automotive News. "We will continue to match production to customer demand," spokesperson Jess Enoch said in a statement, declining to provide specifics about changes at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, which employs 2,200 people. In its report, Automotive News cited a supplier memo that states the automaker will produce 1,600 vehicles per week. The plant had planned production for double that. The change is the latest in a series of moves by the Dearborn automaker and others in the industry to pull back on electric vehicle production. Availability of charging stations, charging speeds, grid reliability and EV affordability remain obstacles to mass adoption. Ford in October said it was cutting $12 billion in planned EV investment as the growth in adoption slows. That included almost halving the size of its west Michigan battery plant in Marshall and delaying by a year the launch of production at one of its two battery plants in Kentucky with SK On. The automaker also cut back production in Mexico of the Mustang Mach-E SUV and has decreased requirements for dealers to be EV certified in the coming years. "We're ... not changing our strategy," Chief Financial Officer John Lawler said last month, "but changing our tactics and pulling back on some of the capital investment around the capacity that we're putting in place so that we can better match capacity with demand." The Lightning's U.S. sales are up. In November, they rose 113% to a record monthly and year-to-date high. But sales aren't growing as quickly as expected, despite a several thousand-dollar price drop in July. In January 2022, Ford announced plans to double Lightning production to 150,000 vehicles per year. It was down for six weeks this summer to expand the capacity. "The demand is there," Marin Gjaja, chief customer officer for Ford Model e, said when the expansion was completed. "We now have the supply to match it.” |
GM has to pay $8 million to Kalea Hall The United Auto Workers has secured nearly $8 million in back pay for General Motors Co. employees affected when the automaker "unallocated" three plants in Michigan, Ohio and Baltimore, UAW Vice President Mike Booth told members in a Dec. 5 letter obtained by The Detroit News. The $8 million will be for about 800 union members and will include payments for lost overtime, 401(k) and pension contributions, performance bonuses and nearly $800,000 in interest, Booth wrote in the letter. "The arbitrator awarded nearly everything the UAW sought as a remedy for GM's breach," Booth wrote in the letter. GM in 2018 announced it would idle five plants: Detroit-Hamtramck, Warren Transmission, Lordstown Assembly in Ohio, Oshawa Assembly in Ontario and Baltimore Operations in Maryland. Of the five, GM closed Lordstown, Warren and Baltimore. Detroit-Hamtramck is now GM's Factory Zero electric vehicle plant and Oshawa workers, represented by Unifor in Canada, are back building trucks for the automaker. The UAW sued the company in 2019, alleging GM had breached its 2015 deal with the union but then dropped the suit and agreed to go through arbitration as part of the UAW-GM 2019 contract. In its lawsuit, the UAW said GM's use of the word "unallocated" purposely avoided the words "idle or "close," which were noted in the 2015 UAW-GM agreement. At the time, GM said its unallocation announcement in 2018 did not "violate the provisions of the UAW-GM National Agreement." The arbitrator in 2022 found that GM did violate the contract. Booth in his letter said "the union is pushing the company to implement the award as soon as possible." He said the award doesn't resolve the union's issue with mutually satisfactory retirement benefits, "which the arbitrator found not to be subject to arbitration in an earlier phase of the case," but the union is going to "continue to fight" to get those benefits for eligible members. In a statement, GM spokesperson Kevin Kelly wrote: "GM is pleased with the arbitrator’s decision related to the mutually satisfactory retirement benefits. We plan no further legal action regarding the arbitrator’s ruling." |
UAW hits major threshold Breana Noble More than 30% of Volkswagen AG workers at the German automaker's only U.S. plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., have signed union authorization cards in less than a week, the United Auto Workers said in a news release Thursday. That includes more than 1,000 workers at the plant that builds the Atlas, Atlas Sport and electric ID.4, according to the union, which last week formally launched a campaign to organize workers at 13 non-union automakers across the country. Hitting the milestone means the organizing drive is going public there. If 50% of workers sign authorization cards at the plant, the UAW says it will hold a rally there. If it receives 70% support, that's when it would demand recognition from the company, or else request a National Labor Relations Board election. The threshold needed to be able to pursue an NLRB election, though, is 30%. “People are standing up like never before,” Steve Cochran, a skilled trades worker and leader of the workers building the union at Volkswagen, said in a statement provided by the UAW. “There are a lot of young workers in the plant now and this generation wants respect. They’re not okay with mistreatment by management. They see what’s happening at Starbucks and Amazon. They know that standing up to join the union is how you win fair treatment, fair pay and a better life.” In a statement posted on Volkswagen's website, the company said workers in Chattanooga have a "world-class production environment" and recently received an 11% pay increase. It described its benefits and development opportunities as reflective of "our constant commitment to our team members." "We believe in frequent, transparent, and two-way dialogue with our people to help them stay informed and connected and help shape our world-class assembly environment," the company said. "We also respect the right of our workers to determine who should represent their interests in the workplace." Organizing foreign-owned assembly plants has been a long-sought goal that turned out to be just out of reach for the UAW as the Detroit Three's market share has fallen from competition. Many plants were built in right-to-work and southern states. Tennessee is a right-to-work state, but General Motors Co. has an enormous Spring Hill Manufacturing campus southwest of Nashville. Hourly workers at the plant, which employs nearly 4,000 people, are organized. Chattanooga is about two-and-a-half hours southeast of Spring Hill. It's not the first time the UAW has pursued an organizing drive at the VW plant. In 2019, VW workers at the plant voted 51.8% against union representation 833 to 776. There also was a narrow defeat in 2014. Now, the UAW says VW has made $184 billion over the last decades. It noted its vehicle prices are up 37% in the past three years. VW says it is "massively invested in our people, the city of Chattanooga and the State of Tennessee." Since 2008, the company has invested more than $4.3 billion in Chattanooga, creating more than 125,000 direct and indirect jobs. In the past two years, it added more than 1,200 production roles and another shift to build the ID.4 SUV. "We are proud to be a part of the automotive growth and innovation happening in the American South," the company's statement said. UAW President Shawn Fain last week told The News that thousands of workers at non-union auto plants have shown their support. The union's campaign is seeking to build off the momentum of three new four-and-a-half-year contracts at the Detroit Three that secured wage increases, cost-of-living adjustments, billions of dollars in investments and increased retirement contributions. Fain declined to provide a timeline or budget for the campaign. In the wake of the UAW-Detroit Three agreements, some other automakers like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ltd. said they were increasing wages, decreasing timelines to the top pay and improving benefits for their own workers. The union has set up a website, uaw.org/vw, where workers can learn more and legally sign up to support representation. |
More than 1,000 VW workers Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United Auto Workers union said on Thursday that more than 1,000 factory workers at Volkswagen AG's Chattanooga, Tennessee assembly plant have signed union authorization cards. Last week, the UAW said it was launching a first-of-its-kind push to publicly organize the entire nonunion auto sector in the U.S. after winning record new contracts with the Detroit Three automakers. The UAW, which said 30% of workers at the VW plant had signed cards, has outlined its organizing strategy that says if 30% of workers at a nonunion plant sign cards seeking to join, it would make that public. If 50% of workers seek to join, the UAW would hold a rally with UAW President Shawn Fain to tout the effort. At 70% and with an organizing committee in place, the UAW would seek recognition or demand a union representation vote. The Detroit-based UAW said workers at 13 nonunion automakers were announcing simultaneous campaigns across the country to join the union, including at Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Rivian, Nissan, BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Those automakers employ nearly 150,000 workers at their U.S. assembly plants, about the same number as those employed by the Detroit Three companies with which the UAW just signed new labor agreements. The UAW's deals with General Motors, Ford Motor and Stellantis included an immediate 11% pay hike and 25% increase in base wages through 2028, cuts the time needed to reach top pay to three years from eight years and is boosting the pay of temporary workers by 150% and making them permanent. VW said last month it would hike pay for factory workers in Tennessee by 11%, joining several foreign automakers who have announced significant pay and other compensation improvements in response to the UAW contracts. Many analysts and industry officials saw the move as an effort to keep the UAW out of their plants. The UAW for decades has unsuccessfully sought to organize auto factories operated by foreign automakers. Efforts to organize Nissan plants in Mississippi and Tennessee failed by wide margins, and two attempts to organize VW's plant in Chattanooga narrowly failed. In 2019, VW workers at the plant voted 833 to 776 against union representation. |
Ford sales down year-over-year in Breana Noble Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales fell 0.5% in November, though electric vehicle sales hit a record high. Ford on Monday reported selling 145,559 vehicles last month, down from 146,364 in November 2022. Sales of EVs were up 43% to almost 9,000 vehicles with Ford No. 2 behind Tesla Inc. Hybrid vehicle sales, meanwhile, rose 75%. The record high EV sales come as the Dearborn automaker is pulling back its EV investments. Ford has cut $12 billion in planned expenditures, including nearly halving the size of its future battery plant in west Michigan's Marshall and delaying the launch of production at one battery plant in Kentucky. Those pullbacks are in response to slower growth in EV sales than had been forecasted, though EV sales volumes still are growing. The bulk of deliveries in November, however, came from internal combustion engine vehicles. Those were down 6.5% as several products built at plants that the United Auto Workers had struck this fall during labor talks saw fewer sales than last year. Pickup trucks took a hit. They were down 2.8% year-over-year. SUV sales were up 0.7%. Mustang sales were up nearly 32%. Numerous nameplates under the Ford brand were down in October, including the Bronco SUV, the Explorer SUV, the Expedition SUV, the Ranger pickup, the Transit and E-Transit cargo vans, the F-Series trucks and heavy trucks. The plants producing most of these vehicles had been on strike as a part of the UAW's 41-day work stoppage that ended Oct. 25. Although F-Series trucks were down 3.8% year-over-year, sales of the electric F-150 Lightning rose 113% to a record monthly and year-to-date high. The F-150 Hybrid's sales were up 36%. Together, they made up a quarter of F-150 sales. The Mustang Mach-E SUV rose 21% in sales. The company highlighted the Maverick as the best-selling hybrid pickup, with sales up 252% over last year. Overall, Maverick sales were up 39% in November. Sales of Ford's luxury Lincoln brand rose 2.2% on a nearly 58% increase in Nautilus SUV sales. Corsair and Aviator SUV sales dropped. The Blue Oval's stock was at nearly 462,000 vehicles at the end of November, including 186,000 F-Series trucks alone. The company produced 2.278 million vehicles in North America through the first 11 months of the year, including more than 205,000 in November. Ford has been ramping production back up at its three assembly plants the UAW struck: Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, home of the Ranger and Bronco; Chicago Assembly Plant, which builds the Ford Explorer and Lincoln Aviator; and Kentucky Truck Plant, which produces Super Duty trucks, the Lincoln Navigator and the Ford Expedition. The strike also disrupted production at numerous other Ford plants, resulting in thousands of temporary layoffs. As of Monday, all workers had been called back to work, Ford spokesperson Jessica Enoch said. The company also has returned to full production schedules at the three assembly plants where workers went on strike. Ford reported last week that the strike resulted in a $1.7 billion earnings hit. Sill, the company is forecasting a full-year adjusted operating income of $10 billion to $10.5 billion. Ford workers in late November ratified a new agreement that includes 27% wage increases over four-and-a-half years, a shorter timeline to the top wage, cost-of-living adjustments, increased retirement contributions and $8.1 billion in investments. Ford says the contract will add $900 in cost per vehicle on average by 2028, which the automaker says it will look to absorb with improved efficiencies and cost reductions elsewhere. Crosstown rivals General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV report sales on a quarterly basis. Of the automakers that report U.S. sales on a monthly basis, several reported year-over-year gains in November, including Honda Motor Co. Ltd. up 33%, Hyundai Motor Co. up 11% to a record volume and Subaru Corp. up 6.4%. Auto information resources Cox Automotive Inc. was predicting a 6.5% increase in sales for November for the overall industry with a seasonally adjusted annual rate near 15.3 million vehicles. Inventory levels, now at 2.4 million, are recovering from years-long parts shortages and nearing 2020 levels. “A slight rise in sales volume is expected in November, but the sales pace will decline for the second straight month," Charlie Chesbrough, Cox's senior economist, said in a forecast. "October is normally one of the slowest sales months of the year, and the buying pace generally increases in November and December. This year, however, despite more discounting and more promotion, we are expecting the sales pace to slow slightly in a weak buying climate.” |
Ford shares new guidance Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. on Thursday said it's anticipating full-year adjusted operating income of $10 billion to $10.5 billion in 2023 that reflects $1.7 billion in lost profits from the United Auto Workers' 41-day strike against it. The Dearborn automaker had withdrawn its annual guidance last month pending the ratification of a tentative agreement with the Detroit-based union that wrapped up earlier this month. Now that workers have approved the agreement and to make up for expected decreases in electric-vehicle premiums, Ford is looking at cost-cutting measures and improvements to its manufacturing process. After increasing its guidance following the second quarter from improvements in supply chain, higher volumes, new Super Duty trucks and lower commodity costs, Ford previously said it had expected an adjusted operating income of $11 billion to $12 billion in 2023. Its original guidance was between $9 billion and $11 billion. "So, if you take that $10.5 (billion), if we hadn't lost that volume due to the strike," Ford Chief Financial Officer John Lawler said Thursday at the Barclays Global Automotive and Mobility Tech Conference, "we would be at the high end of our original guidance of $11 to $12 (billion)." The UAW employed a simultaneous, targeted "stand-up strike" against the Detroit Three. It interrupted production of high-margin trucks and SUVs, resulting in a loss of about 100,000 vehicles, Ford said. The bulk of the $1.7 billion in lost profits — $1.6 billion — will be reflected in fourth-quarter results to be shared on Feb. 6. That's when Ford will share 2024 guidance, as well. Full-year 2023 adjusted free cash flow also is expected to be between $5 billion and $5.5 billion. That's down from the previously forecasted $6.5 billion and $7 billion as well as down from Ford's original 2023 guidance of about $6 billion. Ford says its target is a 40% to 50% return to shareholders. What its 15-cent dividend doesn't cover will be issued in the first quarter of next year as a supplemental dividend. The Blue Oval generated $4.9 billion of net income and $9.4 billion in adjusted operating income through the first three quarters of the year, prior to the full effects of the work stoppage. In total, Ford said the new UAW contract is expected to cost $8.8 billion over the agreement's four-and-half years. Gross wages that include a 27% general wage increase, a three-year wage progression down from eight years and the returned cost-of-living adjustments account for the largest portion of the costs. The company anticipates the deal will add about $900 in costs per vehicle by 2028, which is up to 0.7% of adjusted operating income margin. Ford hopes to offset that with lower expenses and improved productivity. "We need to do that by reducing the number of hours it takes to build a vehicle, simplifying designs and reducing complexity," Lawler said, "as well as driving increased efficiencies through our factories, and that's what we're focused on." The agreement allows the automaker to be able to rebalance manufacturing lines, its footprint and automation, Lawler said. The company sees opportunity on material, warranty and structural costs as well. Those are a part of Ford's greater plans as it expects to earn a smaller premium on EVs than in previous years as the market shifts for early adopters to the mass market where customers are more price-sensitive. The next few years are about quality and cost, Lawler said. Slower growth in EV sales has prompted a pullback in spending on EV investments. Ford has cut $12 billion in planned spending on capacity, halving the size of its battery plant in west Michigan's Marshall and delaying the start of production at one of two joint-venture battery plants in Kentucky. It also has altered its approach to bringing major components on EVs in-house to focus more on pieces like battery management systems and inverters. "Now, vertical integration is going to be important in areas where you have a distinct competitive advantage," Lawler said. "And we did pivot a bit and say that over time, we don't believe batteries, per se the cell and pack, are going to be a differentiating element of the electric vehicle. And so if that's the case, you have to think about your capital allocation in that space." For its second-generation EVs, Ford is expecting revenue to be equal to gas-powered vehicles, and the company is working on how to get to its 8% margin target with that. "We're ... not changing our strategy," Lawler said, "but changing our tactics and pulling back on some of the capital investment around the capacity that we're putting in place so that we can better match capacity with demand." When asked about the UAW agreement's impact on the battery plant, Lawler said: "Our battery plants are not part of the contract. They're joint ventures with SK (Corp.) and they are not part of the countract. They will have to be organized by the UAW. ... That may be different from what others had agreed to but the battery plans are not part of the settlement on this contract for Ford." The Marshall plant, which is wholly owned by a Ford subsidiary, also would need to be organized by the UAW. The UAW agreement does allow the union to use a card-check system there that makes it easier to organize a plant. If a majority of workers sign cards to unionize, that plant would fall under the master agreement. Ford's updated guidance comes after General Motors Co. on Wednesday reinstated a full-year guidance of $11.7 billion to $12.7 billion in operating profit after losing $1.1 billion in operating profit during the United Auto Workers' 46-day targeted plant strike. GM also announced a $10 billion accelerated share repurchase program. GM expects its new UAW contract and three-year agreement with Canadian autoworkers union Unifor will cost the company $9.3 billion over terms of the deals. They are estimated to add $575 to the average cost of a new vehicle, which GM said it expected to be able to absorb for 2024. Stellantis NV CFO Natalie Knight last month said the union's 44-day strike was expected to reduce the company's 2023 net income by less than $800 million, and the deal's financial impact per vehicle was in line with Ford's estimates. |
Transport Canada Warns Story by Mike Chaar Transport Canada has published several car recalls in Canada from manufacturers including Nissan, Toyota, Tesla and Honda to name a few. The recalls are due to several health and safety risks posed to both drivers and passengers of the affected vehicles. From issues involving faulty seatbelt retractors, airbags and issues with the rearview mirror all the way to steering gearboxes that were not manufactured accurately, the federal department is urging Canadian drivers to verify if their cars are included in the recalls, and is instructing on which steps to take in order to fix the problem(s) concerning the current recall. Here is the complete list of the nine recalled vehicles flagged by Transport Canada: Recall Reason: Per the Transport Canada recall page, "the rear outboard seat belt retractors may not have been manufactured correctly. As a result, the seat belts may not extend and/or retract correctly." What You Need To Do: Hyundai will notify owners by mail and advise you to take your vehicle to a dealership to inspect the left and right-rear seat belt retractors and replace them if necessary. "Hyundai recommends that if you hear a noise when extending the seat belt or are unable to extend it, you should not transport a passenger in that seat, and you should contact a dealer immediately to have the vehicle inspected," the recall warning indicated. Hyundai Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: Per the Transport Canada recall page, "the rear outboard seat belt retractors may not have been manufactured correctly. As a result, the seat belts may not extend and/or retract correctly." What You Need To Do: Hyundai will notify owners by mail and advise you to take your vehicle to a dealership to inspect the left and right-rear seat belt retractors and replace them if necessary. "Hyundai recommends that if you hear a noise when extending the seat belt or are unable to extend it, you should not transport a passenger in that seat, and you should contact a dealer immediately to have the vehicle inspected," the recall warning indicated. Mercedes-Benz Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: Per the recall warning page, the rearview camera image could freeze while backing up. If this happens, the driver's visibility can be greatly reduced and the likelihood of a crash is greater. What You Need To Do: Mercedes-Benz will notify owners by mail and advise you to take your vehicle to a dealership to have the rearview camera replaced. Tesla Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: According to the recall page, "on a small number of vehicles, the wrong airbag may have been installed on the steering wheel after it was replaced from yoke steering to a round steering wheel, or vice versa." A car fit with a poorly installed airbag could increase the risk of injury in a crash. What You Need To Do: Tesla will notify owners by e-mail and advise you to contact Tesla Service to arrange for an inspection and, if necessary, the replacement of the steering wheel airbag. Honda Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: Certain vehicles may have a steering gearbox that was not manufactured accurately. This issue could lead to the steering rack locking up while the vehicle is in motion. Such an unexpected loss of steering control poses a significant risk of a potential collision, per the recall warning. What You Need To Do: Honda will notify owners by mail and advise you to take your vehicle to a dealership to replace the steering gearbox. BMW Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: There is an issue with the driver's seat belt, as it may fail to lock up as intended during braking or in the event of a crash. This poses a safety concern, as a malfunctioning seat belt that doesn't lock properly in a crash could significantly increase the risk of injury, the Transport Canada page noted. What You Need To Do: The company will notify owners by mail and instruct them to take their vehicle to a dealer to replace the driver's seat belt assembly. Fiat Chrysler Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: "On certain vehicles equipped with a 3.0 L diesel engine, the high-pressure fuel pump could fail. If this happens, you may notice a change in engine performance, a fuel leak, or a malfunction indicator lamp and/or service electronic throttle control tell-tale may turn on. This could also result in a sudden loss of engine power while driving," the recall page indicated. What You Need To Do: FCA Canada will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your vehicle to a dealership to replace the high-pressure fuel pump. Ford Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: Per the recall warning, a software glitch may lead to the incorrect rearview camera image being shown during the reverse process. Consequently, there is a possibility that the hitch or trailer view image might be displayed instead of the standard rearview image. It is important to note that Canadian regulations mandate the display of the rearview image when in reverse. What You Need To Do: Ford will notify owners by mail and advise you to take your truck to a dealership to update the advanced drive assistance system module software. Toyota Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: "On certain vehicles, the battery hold-down assembly may not properly secure certain 12 V aftermarket batteries. As a result, the battery could shift positions and cause the positive battery post to contact the hold-down bracket. If this happens, there could be a short circuit," the Transport Canada page said. What You Need To Do: Toyota will notify owners by mail and advise you to take your vehicle to a dealership to replace the battery clamp sub-assembly, battery tray, and positive terminal cover. Nissan Recalled Cars:
Recall Reason: The wiring harness of the rearview camera is susceptible to damage from movement and vibrations. In the event of such damage, the rearview camera image may exhibit incorrect or no display at all. Compliance with Canadian regulations mandates that the rearview image must be visible during the reversing process, the recall page said. What You Need To Do: Nissan will send notifications to owners via mail, instructing them to take their vehicles to a dealership for an inspection of the rearview camera wiring harness. If necessary, protective tape will be applied, and the wiring will be rerouted. In cases where damage is detected, both the rearview camera and wiring harness will be replaced. |
Detroit's Big Three Union workers at Ford approved a new contract with the company by a 2-to-1 ratio after General Motors employees ratified it in a much closer vote. Nov. 20, 2023, Union members at Ford, Stellantis and General Motors have ratified a new 4½-year contract, locking in at 11% pay increases secured after a six-week strike in September and October. The United Auto Workers said that roughly 67% of Ford employees represented by the UAW voted in favor of the contract, which will last through April 30, 2028. Voting officially ends Friday, but with around 57,000 union employees at Ford, the contract appeared headed toward easy ratification. The contracts were negotiated after members of the UAW went on strike from Sept. 15 until late October. Union members will get a total pay increase of 25% over the course of the deal. The new contracts also reinstate cost-of-living adjustments, let workers reach top wages in three years instead of eight and protect their right to strike over plant closures. Both the UAW and the carmakers described the deals as “record” contracts based on those pay increases. The union also said members were regaining some of the benefits they agreed to give up after the Great Recession to help keep the automakers alive. Workers at GM approved the contract, but they did so by a much narrower margin than Ford's employees did, with about 55% of workers voting yes. While UAW President Shawn Fain has called the contacts a victory for workers, he has also said they are part of a larger plan to win back more benefits over the long haul. According to the UAW's ratification vote tracker, Stellantis employees were on pace to approve the deal at margins similar to Ford workers. With 17,391 votes tallied as of Thursday evening ET, about 66% of ballots had been cast in favor of accepting the contract. While the general terms of the contracts are similar, workers at Detroit's Big Three automakers are voting to accept or reject them independently. |
UAW ratifies deal with GM November 17, 2023 The agreement passed by a margin of 55 percent to 45 percent, winning by nearly 3,300 votes out of more than 35,000 cast. In contrast to the close voting at GM, the UAW's deals with Ford and Stellantis are easily headed toward ratification. Hourly workers at General Motors component plants, parts distribution centers and battery plants canceled out opposition from higher-paid assembly plant employees to ratify a labor agreement that puts nearly everyone on the same wage scale. The agreement passed by a margin of 55 percent to 45 percent, winning by nearly 3,300 votes out of more than 35,000 cast. The deal received support from about 81 percent of workers at GM Components Holding plants and parts distribution centers, as well as 96 percent of those at two electric vehicle battery plants. Many will receive immediate raises of up to 89 percent. Meanwhile, 53 percent of workers at GM’s assembly, metal and propulsion plants voted no. Workers who already were on GM’s top wage scale will get immediate 11 percent raises upon ratification. All workers also get a $5,000 ratification bonus. The UAW and GM declined to immediately comment Thursday. The agreement was in doubt earlier in the week after workers at seven of the company's 11 U.S. assembly plants rejected it. But support from 61 percent of workers at Arlington Assembly in Texas helped to prevent the deal's failure. In contrast to the close voting at GM, the UAW's deals with Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis are easily headed toward ratification. Both were passing by roughly 2-to-1 margins as of Thursday afternoon. Highlights of the terms The GM agreement, which runs through April 2028, includes roughly $2 billion in new investment for future electric vehicle and parts production at three plants, brings employees at GM's joint-venture battery plants under the national UAW agreement and bumps wages and retirement contributions for its U.S. hourly work force. With the restoration of a cost-of-living adjustment, top wages would rise from about $32 per hour today to more than $42 by the end of the deal, and new hires would get to that level in three years instead of eight. Temporary workers with at least 90 days on the job will see their wages rise between 51 and 115 percent at ratification as they are converted to full-time employees with seniority, the union has said. Workers at GM’s parts distribution centers and components plants will move to the main production rate under the new agreement. Their wages currently start around $16 or $17 per hour, with top wages maxing out at less than $32 per hour for manufacturing workers. The wage gains in this contract for newer employees at a GM parts distribution center in Hudson, Wis., will be “life-changing,” said Steve Frisque, president of UAW Local 722, where 93 percent of workers voted to ratify the deal. “We feel they’re working right alongside us and should be making the same wage,” Frisque said. Most Toledo workers opposed the deal, according to the union’s vote count. Totty said the plant has many employees who are nearing retirement in the upcoming contract cycle, and many employees are concerned retirement benefits in the agreement don’t go far enough. GM agreed to increase its contribution into employees' 401(k) retirement accounts to 10 percent from 6.4 percent and provide a $5 increase to the basic monthly benefit for traditional pension holders, which would equate to an increase of $1,800 annually for future pensioners, the union said in a document highlighting the key contract changes. The contract provides gains that workers are pleased with, but “there’s still a glaring hole in it, and that’s for the pension,” Totty told Automotive News. “This is a better deal for somebody who doesn’t even work for our company yet than for somebody who just put in 30 years,” he said. “Now’s the time to fix it.” Art Wheaton, a labor relations expert at Cornell University, said the close vote wasn’t a bad thing. “It’s the sign of a good negotiations,” Wheaton said. “If they got a 99 percent vote, that means GM overspent. If they got 49 percent, that means GM was too cheap. If you’re at more than 50 percent, it means you threaded the needle.” He said the vote revealed lingering differences among the various subsets of workers. “Those with a higher seniority did not get as much of an increase because the union’s lifting up the lower-paid workers,” he said. “Those that were used to getting paid more than the others aren’t as happy.” |
Autoworkers to wrap up voting The Canadian Press DETROIT (AP) — In a tight vote, thousands of United Auto Workers members at General Motors are expected to finish casting ballots Thursday on a tentative contract agreement that could be a giant step toward ending a prolonged labor dispute with Detroit’s Big Three automakers. The outcome of the GM vote is uncertain, despite the UAW's celebrations of victories last month on many key demands that led to six weeks of targeted walkouts against GM, Ford and Stellantis, the maker of Jeep, Dodge and Ram vehicles. The union is expected to announce GM results Thursday. The three contracts, if approved by 146,000 union members, would dramatically raise pay for autoworkers, with increases and cost-of-living adjustments that would translate into a 33% wage gain. Top assembly plant workers would earn roughly $42 per hour when the contracts expire in April of 2028. Voting continues at Ford through early Saturday, where 66.1% of workers voted in favor so far with only a few large factories still counting. At Stellantis, workers had voted 66.5% in favor of the deal as early Thursday, with some large factories yet to finish casting ballots, according to a vote tracker on the UAW website. Questions remain on new contract between UAW and GM About 46,000 UAW members at GM were wrapping up voting. As of Thursday morning, those for the agreement outnumbered those against it by about 2,500 votes. That total didn’t include the tally from a 2,400-worker assembly plant in Lansing, Michigan, where 61% of members cast ballots against the contract. The union local there didn't release actual voting figures. Of the four GM plants that went on strike, workers at only a large SUV plant in Arlington, Texas, approved the contract. Workers in Wentzville, Missouri; Lansing Delta Township, Michigan; and Spring Hill, Tennessee, voted it down. Workers said that longtime employees at GM were unhappy that they didn’t get larger pay raises like newer workers, and they wanted a bigger pension increase. Several smaller facilities were still voting, many of them parts warehouses or component factories where workers got big pay raises and were expected to approve the contract. Keith Crowell, the local union president in Arlington, said the plant has a diverse group of workers from full- and part-time temporary hires to longtime assembly line employees. Full-time temporary workers liked the large raises they received and the chance to get top union pay, he said. But many longtime workers didn’t think immediate 11% pay raises under the deal were enough to make up for concessions granted to GM in 2008, he said. That year, the union accepted lower pay for new hires and gave up cost of living adjustments and general annual pay raises to help the automakers out of dire financial problems during the Great Recession. Even so, GM and Stellantis, then known as Chrysler, went into government-funded bankruptcies. “There was something in there for everybody, but everybody couldn’t get everything they wanted,” Crowell said. “At least we’re making a step in the right direction to recover from 2008.” Citing the automakers' strong profits, UAW President Shawn Fain has insisted it was well past time to make up for the 2008 concessions. President Joe Biden hailed the resolution of the strike as an early victory for what Biden calls a worker-centered economy. But the success of the tentative contracts will ultimately hinge on the ability of automakers to keep generating profits as they shift toward electric vehicles in a competitive market. Thousands of UAW members joined picket lines in targeted strikes starting Sept. 15 before the tentative deals were reached late last month. Rather than striking at one company, the union targeted individual plants at all three automakers. At its peak about 46,000 of the union’s 146,000 workers at the Detroit companies were walking picket lines. In the deals with all three companies, longtime workers would get 25% general raises over the life of the contracts with 11% up front. Including cost of living adjustments, they’d get about 33%, the union said. The contract took steps toward ending lower tiers of wages for newer hires, reducing the number of years it takes to reach top pay. Many newer hires wanted defined benefit pension plans instead of 401(k) retirement plans. But the companies agreed to contribute 10% per year into 401(k) plans instead. Tom Krisher, The Associated Press |
UAW workers at major Ford November 15, 2023 Autoworkers at Ford's Kentucky Truck Plant in Louisville, Ky., voted no on the contract agreement reached by the United Auto Workers union. According to vote trackers on the UAW's website, 54.5% of the 4,118 ballots cast in Kentucky — Ford's largest plant — were no votes, the results showed Monday. The plant, which builds Ford's F-Series Super Duty pickup trucks among other models, is estimated to employ 8,700 workers. This indicates that the road ahead for the UAW may not be as smooth as union leadership had hoped for, after reaching record agreements with all three major automakers following a six-week auto strike. GM workers in Flint also voted no This comes after another loss last week, when 52% of the 3,425 ballots cast at General Motors' Flint Assembly plant were also no votes. Roughly 4,700 workers at that plant build Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup trucks. By most measures, the contracts have been generous. They provide workers with a 25% wage increase and in some cases more by 2027, cost of living allowances and improved retirement contributions. But even with those historic gains, they don't bring workers back to where they were before 2007, when wages and benefits were slashed amid tough economic times. Most workers must vote in favor Only by 2027, will the top wage at each of the Big 3 reach where it was 20 years ago, when adjusted for inflation, and none of the carmakers conceded to the union's demands to bring back pensions and retiree health care. "There were a lot of gains," says Kentucky Truck Plant worker Jenn Thompson, who voted no. "But there were just a few things that I would have liked to have seen in this contract that didn't make it," including retiree health care. Despite these setbacks, a majority of the union members overall still support the contracts, with about 10,000 ballots cast so far at GM and 25,000 at Ford. A majority of workers at each of the Big 3 must vote in favor of ratifying the contracts for them to take effect. UAW President Shawn Fain has repeatedly called the workers the union's highest authority. Should any of the contracts fail to reach a majority of yes votes, negotiators would have to return to the bargaining table. Finally tallies at the Big 3 automakers are expected this week and next. |
Unifor auto talks: a quiet end to The Canadian Press Unifor auto talks: a quiet end to one of the year's biggest labour clashes© Provided by The Canadian Press TORONTO — One of Canada's most highly anticipated set of labour talks in years wrapped up this week, but there’s no victory parade planned. Unifor’s marathon three months of high profile contact talks with the Detroit Three automakers — where gains and losses often set the tone for other industries — instead ended with a tepid 60 per cent vote of support from Stellantis production workers Monday, before the union quickly moved on to other labour fights in a year that’s been full of them. “It seems like every week we have another strike deadline that we're facing. This has been a very big bargaining year for us,” said Lana Payne, national president of Unifor in an interview. But while the union has seen some 85,000 members at the bargaining table this year, expectations were especially high for the nearly 20,000 who work at Stellantis, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors. After decades of concessions to the automakers, the combination of high frustration about the rising cost of labour and the record profits of the companies had combined to create what looked like a generational opportunity to claw back past losses. “We told the automakers that the expectations were high, and nothing short of a historic collective agreement was going to get ratified in these moments,” said Payne. The result was a deal that secured base wage gains for production workers of nearly 20 per cent, along with a long list of other improvements including to pensions, job security, a faster path to seniority, bonus pay and more vacation days. The low approval rate at Stellantis, along with the 54 per cent vote in favour rate at Ford in late September, show just how high those expectations were among workers. “The most fascinating part of this round of bargaining was the contrast between the relative strength of the pattern agreement, and the relative weakness of the ratification,” said Brock University Labour Studies professor Larry Savage. “Workers aren't content to tread water in the context of a cost-of-living crisis; they expect their unions to deliver more at the bargaining table.” GM workers, heavily weighted toward recent hires at the Oshawa plant who will benefit the most from the faster route to senior pay, voted 84 per cent in favour. But older workers at other plants, some whom have lived through decade of belt-tightening and job losses, clearly wanted to make up more ground. “I don't think it's that older generation of workers got a bad deal. It's just that they remember what things used to be like,” said Savage. The wage picture shows just how much things have changed. The starting rate for workers will go from the current $24.26 an hour $31.16 by the end of the contract for a notable 28 per cent jump. But the starting rate in 2007 was $28.82, which is almost $41 in today’s dollars, said Tony Leah, a labour activist and retiree at the Oshawa local. “They're getting big increases only because of how badly they've been treated over the last 10 or 15 years,” said Leah. The voting results also don’t reflect the voices of the thousands of union retirees like Leah, who made some of the biggest concessions in past bargaining rounds. In 2007, for example, workers agreed to pensions that weren’t linked to inflation, and so haven’t seen a penny increase since. This year, Unifor secured $800 a year in a ‘health-care allowance’ for those workers, but it’s not guaranteed long-term, and amounts to little more than a coffee a day, said Leah. “There was a lot of anger from retirees because we had been told that pensions were the No. 1 demand.” Payne said the union made improvements on pensions across the board this year, including a shift back to defined benefit plans. She said the boost for retirees, the last concession they were able to squeeze out of Ford, is something they can build on, but that it’s also the area where companies are most resistant. “When you go to bargaining table, the last thing, and the hardest thing to do, is to bargain improvements in pension plans.” Given how far autoworkers wages and benefits had slipped, it was never going to be regained in one contract, said Peggy Nash, a past labour negotiator with the Canadian Auto Workers, Unifor’s predecessor. “You can't redress changes that have taken place over many, many years, all in one contract. Collective bargaining is always incremental” said Nash, who now heads the advisory committee at Toronto Metropolitan University’s Centre for Labour Management Relations. There’s always the potential to push for more concessions, but negotiations are based on relationships, and at some point negotiators need to decide they’ve met their key demands. “You just make a judgment call at a given point in time that you have bargained as much as you're going to be able to get, without a significant amount of pain on both sides.” Unifor did go on strike at GM and Stellantis after the companies resisted matching the terms agreed to at Ford, but they only lasted about as long as a shift before the union secured tentative agreements. It was a sharp contrast with the aggressive stance of the UAW which spent six weeks in escalating strikes. The Canadian union faces the extra complication of making sure the American companies stay committed to Canada. “It reflects the fact that the union in Canada wanted to walk tight rope between making significant gains at the bargaining table, without scaring the (Detroit Three) into pulling investments out of Canada,” said Savage. Payne said the question of investments, especially as auto companies undergo the massive transformation to the electric vehicle future, is always close at hand. “Every conversation I have with the CEOs of these companies is why they should be investing more in Canada.” She said the union has set a template for other sectors, while also putting autoworkers back on the road to prosperity. “We've achieved a lot here,” said Payne. “People will look back on this moment as kind of a turning point in terms of building the sector up, and having these jobs once again be the premium jobs in manufacturing in Canada.”
|
Honda hikes production workers' Story by Reuters (Reuters) -Honda Motor said on Friday it was implementing an 11% pay hike for production workers at its U.S. facilities from January, days after the United Auto Workers (UAW) union and the Detroit Three automakers agreed to record contracts. The company also said it would cut the time it takes for a worker to get to the top wage tier to three years from six, confirming an earlier Wall Street Journal report. Non-unionized automakers such as Honda have come under pressure to improve pay and benefits following record contracts the UAW won at the Detroit Three automakers. Honda, which began manufacturing in America in 1979, currently has 12 plants in the country which produce five million products annually. The Japanese automaker has over 23,000 employees that help build its products in the U.S. General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler-parent Stellantis have all agreed to hike employee base wages by 25% and restore cost of living allowances (COLA) in deals with the UAW. Union workers are now voting on contracts from each of Detroit's Big Three automakers. The UAW has also signaled that the next step in its campaign was to capitalize on its gains in bargaining with the Detroit Three, by launching organizing drives at Toyota, Tesla and other non-union U.S. auto factories. Honda had told Reuters it was evaluating the recent UAW deals with the Detroit Three automakers and would remain competitive. |
Biden wants UAW style labor deal for all U.S. auto workers The president spoke to UAW workers here in Illinois as the Democratic president tries to rally support for his economic agenda and firm up sagging popularity numbers. BELVIDERE, Ill. — President Joe Biden said on Thursday he wants all U.S. autoworkers to get labor deals like the tentative one the UAW reached with the Detroit 3 automakers after a more than six-week strike. "I want this type of contract for all auto workers and I have a feeling the UAW has a plan for that," Biden said. He said Toyota Motor Corp. "had no choice" but to raise wages for U.S. hourly workers because of the UAW deal. Biden spoke to UAW workers here in Illinois as the Democratic president tries to rally support for his economic agenda and firm up sagging popularity numbers, ahead of a re-election campaign next year. Donning a red UAW T-shirt, Biden congratulated Shawn Fain, the head of the UAW, and highlighted the tentative contract agreements between the union and the Detroit 3 that ended more than six weeks of strikes. As part of the deal, Chrysler parent Stellantis agreed to reopen its assembly plant in Belvidere and invest billions of dollars in new operations in the area. En route to the event, Biden told reporters that he “absolutely” supports the UAW's efforts to unionize Tesla Inc. and Toyota workers. In response to Biden's remarks, Toyota said it wants to "foster positive morale" and boost productivity in its workforce. "The decision to unionize is ultimately made by our team members," the Japanese automaker said in a statement. Nichelle Cruz, who was laid off from the Belvidere plant, said she was shocked when she heard Tuesday that Biden was coming to town. That shock then turned to nervousness when she was asked to tell her story and introduce Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. Cruz, who has been with the company for nearly 30 years, had worked at the plant since 2009. She came to Belvidere Assembly Plant after working at Chrysler's St. Louis minivan plant until it closed in 2008. Cruz has been living apart from her husband, who lost his job in Belvidere in 2019 and now works at the Toledo Assembly Complex in Ohio. Cruz proudly proclaimed during her speech that she was getting her husband back thanks to the UAW’s tentative agreement that is being voted on now, which will allow displaced Belvidere workers to return. The Belvidere plant, which was idled in February, now is slated to build a midsize pickup on two shifts starting in 2027. The plant last built Jeep Cherokee SUVs. Stellantis also plans to open a $100 million Mopar parts hub next year by consolidating work from its Marysville, Chicago, and Milwaukee parts distribution centers in Belvidere. The UAW says the automaker will begin stamping operations in support of replacement parts for the Belvidere hub in 2025. In 2028, Stellantis plans to open a $3.2 billion joint-venture battery plant in Belvidere that will create 1,300 jobs. Cruz told Automotive News before her speech that she was honored to see Biden join the picket line with striking GM workers at a Detroit-area parts distribution center last month. “I just think this is awesome,” Cruz said. “This is a beautiful day. To have the presence of him here, the president of the United States? Come on now. That is huge. Just for him to take time out his schedule to come here to support UAW.” Belvidere Mayor Clint Morris spoke to Biden on Thursday and said it was a “historic day” for Belvidere. Morris said he empathized with the laid-off workers because he went through a similar situation in 1982, when he lost his job in the machine tool industry while supporting his young family. He was happy to see a deal come together that will bring jobs back to the area. “I couldn't be more proud of the agreement that they were able to strike between Stellantis and the UAW,” Morris told Automotive News. “Then all the help that the state and the governor, Gov. Pritzker, and all the way up even on a federal level to local representatives here. We were able to pull together with a common goal and pull in the right direction.” Musk fight Biden's comments may renew friction between the U.S. president and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, as the UAW seeks to organize Tesla workers. Musk and Biden sparred in recent years, and in 2021 Musk said Biden's EV policy appeared to be controlled by labor unions. Biden first publicly acknowledged Tesla's EV production in February 2022, after Musk repeatedly complained about being ignored by the president. Recently, the UAW tried and failed to win enough support from workers at Tesla’s Fremont, Calif., factory to hold an organizing vote. The plant was a UAW shop when it was jointly owned by GM and Toyota and known as NUMMI. The UAW filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board over a 2018 Musk tweet in which he asked "why pay union dues & give up stock options for nothing." The NLRB ruled the tweet violated laws prohibiting management threats against workers for supporting unionization. Endorsement questions Thursday's appearance once again allowed Biden to showcase his pro-union credentials to the UAW, which has yet to endorse him, unlike most other labor organizations. In September, UAW's Fain ruled out meeting Trump, casting him as an out-of-touch billionaire, who does not have "any bit of care about what our workers stand for, what the working class stands for." Labor leaders and Democratic officials said an endorsement from the UAW for Biden is expected after the union's members approve their tentative contract agreements, which dramatically raises pay for auto workers and ended a strike targeting GM, Ford and Stellantis, the maker of Jeep, Dodge and Ram vehicles. The relationship between Biden and Fain "didn't start as cozy as it is now," said Mark Burton, a partner at the law firm of Honigman and a former chief strategist of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat. But Biden taking on a "more supportive but silent role" during the UAW negotiations improved the relationship, Burton said, adding that Biden "has formed a good working relationship with Shawn Fain and I think the near-term result will be an endorsement."
|
Toyota’s non-unionized workers BYCHESTER DAWSON AND BLOOMBERG Toyota is raising wages for assembly workers in the US after its Detroit carmaking rivals reached tentative deals with their union to boost pay. The Japanese auto giant plans to increase the highest wage for most assembly line workers by 9.2% to $34.80 an hour as of Jan. 1, a person familiar with the matter said Wednesday. The move by Toyota follows major compensation gains negotiated by the United Auto Workers union on behalf of hourly workers it represents at plants in the US run by General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. Workers at US plants operated by Toyota, like other foreign brands and Tesla Inc., are not unionized. But UAW President Shawn Fain has vowed to expand his union’s reach beyond the Detroit three by 2028. Toyota currently operates nine auto parts and vehicle assembly plants across eight states and is building a new battery production facility in North Carolina. The wage hike by Toyota was reported Tuesday by Labor Notes, a trade publication that supports collective bargaining. |
Stellantis workers vote in favour The Canadian Press Stellantis workers vote in favour of collective agreement: Unifor© Provided by The Canadian Press TORONTO — Unifor says Stellantis production workers voted 60 per cent in favour of a new three-year contract with the automaker. The deal covers workers at the company's Windsor and Brampton, Ont., assembly plants and Etobicoke Casting Plant. Approval for smaller agreements covering Stellantis workers in other units ranged from 85 to 100 per cent. The union reached the tentative deal with the automaker, which mirrored deals already in place with Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co., after a brief strike on Oct. 30. Unifor members at Ford had voted 54 per cent in favour of the contract, while GM members voted 81 per cent in favour. The Stellantis contract, which will cover around 8,200 workers, will see general wages rise by 10 per cent in the first year, two per cent in the second and three per cent in the third. The deal also adds two paid holidays, makes pension improvements and halves the time for workers to reach full pay, among other gains. Alongside the improvements also gained by Ford and General Motors members, Unifor national president Lana Payne said in a statement that the contract confirms investment and product commitments for the three plants, including the retooling of the Brampton plant to build electric vehicles. In a press release, Stellantis said its operations in Canada will continue to play a critical role as it prepares to introduce more battery-electric vehicles in Canada and the U.S. by the end of the decade. “It was always our intention to reward our Unifor-represented employees for their contributions to our business during this round of bargaining,” said Mark Stewart, chief operating officer of Stellantis in North America, in the release. “The Canadian workforce plays a key role in the Stellantis global Dare Forward strategic plan as we make the transition to electrification, so it was especially important for us to reach an agreement that secures the future of the company for our employees, their families and our customers." |
Ford's sales down in October Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co.'s sales fell 5.3% in October, the first month that reflected the impact of the United Auto Workers' strike of the Detroit automakers that halted production at numerous assembly plants. Ford on Thursday reported selling 149,938 vehicles last month, down from 158,327 in October 2022. Sales of electric vehicles were up 9.1%, sales of hybrid vehicles reached a new monthly record with a 37.9% gain, and sales of internal combustion engine vehicles — which make up the bulk of Ford's volume — were down 8.8%. The company has increasingly focused on growing sales of hybrid vehicles that are proving to be popular with customers. SUV sales were essentially flat in October compared to a year ago, while truck sales dropped 10.5%. Car sales were up 10.7%. Numerous nameplates under the Ford brand were down in October, including the Bronco SUV, the electric Mustang Mach-E crossover, the Expedition SUV, F-Series trucks, Ranger pickups, Transit and Transit Connect cargo vans, and heavy trucks. Sales were up across Bronco Sport, Escape, Edge, Explorer, Maverick and E-Series. Sales of the electric F-150 Lightning rose more than 50%. Mustang posted an 11% sales gain for the month. Sales of Ford's luxury Lincoln brand fell 4.5%. At the start of the week, Ford began calling back to work thousands of UAW-represented workers who had either been on strike or were laid off as a result of the strike. Ford and the UAW reached a tentative agreement on a new four-and-a-half year contract last week; the strike ended Monday after 46 days when the union settled with General Motors Co. The pacts must still be ratified by workers. Ford is ramping production back up at the three assembly plants the UAW struck: Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, which assembles the Ranger and Bronco; Chicago Assembly Plant, which builds the Ford Explorer and Lincoln Aviator; and Kentucky Truck Plant, which builds Super Duty trucks, the Lincoln Navigator and the Ford Expedition. The strike also disrupted production at numerous other Ford plants, resulting in thousands of temporary layoffs. Ford reported last week that the strike resulted in a $1.3 billion earnings hit. Crosstown rivals GM and Stellantis NV report sales on a quarterly basis. But of the automakers who report U.S. sales on a monthly basis, several reported gains in October, including American Honda Motor Co., Toyota Motor North America and Hyundai Motor Co. Industry forecasters had been expecting sales to increase from year-ago levels in October. Cox Automotive had forecasted a 4% sales gain and for the month's seasonally adjusted annual rate to finish near 15.8 million units. “Though there are many headwinds in the market today, new-vehicle sales continue to show gains over last year’s supply-constrained market," Charlie Chesbrough, Cox's senior economist, said in a statement ahead of the sales reports. "Concerns about high interest rates, a potential economic recession, and the ongoing UAW strike are all likely holding back some potential vehicle buyers. However, there are still enough individuals and businesses with the need and ability to buy vehicles, which has helped sustain the sales recovery.” |
What's the deal? UAW details Kalea Hall The United Auto Workers’ “record” contract with General Motors Co., outlined Saturday by top union leaders, raises pay and sweeps new groups of workers into a new national agreement likely to set a higher standard for labor in the U.S. auto industry as it marks the likely end of a months-long battle. Similar to deals with Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV, the UAW-GM contract includes 27% in compounded base wage increases for hourly employees, revives cost-of-living adjustments, requires a shorter timeline to the top wage, sets rollover commitments for temporary/supplemental workers and charts a pathway for employees at future battery plants to become unionized under the union's master agreement with the companies. The deal would end in April 2028. "We were able to wrench back so much of what these companies have stolen from us over the past few decades," UAW President Shawn Fain said on a Saturday Facebook Live where he detailed specifics of the deal to members with UAW Vice President Mike Booth. "We won back billions in contract gains. We won back our dignity as autoworkers. We won back our pride in being UAW." A significant win for the union was persuading GM to agree to bring its joint-venture battery plant employees and subsidiary employees at GM Subsystems LLC under the master agreement. GM is so far the only Detroit Three automaker with an operating, and organized, battery cell manufacturing facility. GM and and LG Energy Solution's Ultium Cells LLC plant in northeast Ohio has more than 1,000 employees. The companies have plans to open two more battery cell plants together. "After they said for months that it was impossible, Ultium Cells workers will now be under our national agreement," Fain said. "The significance of this cannot be overstated. Right now, the future of our industry is being defined and employers like GM have used joint ventures to drive a race to the bottom. These jobs at Ultium Cells are dangerous, difficult, and pay low wages. But all of that comes to an end in this agreement." GM Subsystems, a subsidiary of GM, employs a lower-paid workforce to perform some jobs previously performed by workers under the national UAW-GM contract and tasks dedicated to battery electric vehicle production. Its employees work in Orion Assembly in Orion Township, Factory Zero at Detroit Hamtramck Assembly Center, Flint Assembly, Lansing Grand River and the Brownstown battery plant. The UAW-GM tentative deal also includes $1.94 billion in investment for GM's Fairfax plant in Kansas, GM's Lansing Grand River plant in Michigan and Tonawanda Engine facility in New York, according to the UAW-GM contract highlighter. GM's Lansing Grand River plant is slated to receive a $1.25 billion investment and Fairfax would get a $391 million investment also for future electric vehicles. Tonawanda would receive a $300 million investment for drive unit production. GM declined to comment on the new tentative agreement and comments made during the union's Facebook Live event, but in a statement the company said: "We are pleased that the new tentative agreement allows us to continue to invest in our U.S. manufacturing footprint and provide good jobs for our team members. We'll have more specifics around product details moving forward." After the Detroit Three deals are approved by members, the UAW's next goal will be to organize other automakers — a combination of foreign-owned rivals and such startups as Tesla Inc. that together represent the majority of vehicles sold in the rich U.S. market. "The Big Three aren't the only auto companies making record profits," Fain said Saturday. "Autoworkers at Toyota, Honda, Volkswagen, Hyundai and Tesla, they deserve record contracts, too. And we're going to do everything we can to support them in the fight to win what they deserve." Economics of the deal Compounded, wage increases would total 27% over the four-and-a-half years, up from the $32.22 per hour top wage today. That includes an immediate 11% increase followed by 3% hikes in 2024, '25 and '26. Members would get a 5% increase in 2027. There also is a $5,000 ratification bonus for all GM employees, including members at GM Subsystems, CCA, Ultium Cells and Components Holdings. All active temporary employees with 90 days service prior to effective date would also receive the $5,000 ratification bonus. With reinstatement of cost-of-living adjustments that were suspended in 2009, the union estimated the top wage will rise 33% to more than $42 per hour. The starting wage would increase by 67% compounded with estimated COLA to more than $30 an hour. For production workers, the top rate, not including estimated COLA, would increase to $35.88 from $32.32 upon ratification; to $36.96 next year; to $38.07 in 2025; to $39.21 in 2026; and to $41.17 in 2027. The union estimates that COLA would add $1.78 to base wages by the end of the agreement and a total value of about $8,800. GM's temporary employees would start at $21 per hour and convert to full-time after nine months. All employees at GM Subsystems, Customer Care and Aftersales and GM Components Holdings will immediately convert to GM's main production rate upon ratification of the deal. These union members will have an immediate wage boost of between 36% and 89%, according to the union. For example, a current Components Holdings member with three years of service making $18.96 per hour will have hourly wages increase nearly $17 upon ratification to $35.88. The wage scales at Subsystems, CCA and Components Holdings are identical to the scale for in-progression GM workers with pay per hour starting at $25.12 and going to $35.88 in three years. For health care coverage, the deal would come with no increases in co-pays, deductibles or out-of-pocket costs for members. Additionally, coverage will now start on the date of hire for all new employees. The deal would end tiered vacation time and would make employees with 20 years or more of service eligible for 200 hours of vacation. GM has added Juneteenth as a paid holiday. GM, according to the union, also agreed to provide eligible members up to two weeks of paid time off for a leave of absence for birth, adoption, surrogacy or foster care situations. This would be effective Jan. 1, 2024. The deal with GM includes similar benefits to what's in the pacts with Ford and Stellantis including:
The UAW-GM agreement includes $500 annual payments for current retirees and surviving spouses. For current traditional members, it includes a $5 increase to the basic benefit that will bring an increase of $1,800 a year to future pensioners. And the company plans to offer three special attrition programs starting in January and lasting through the end of the agreement. The program would offer $50,000 lump-sum retirement incentives for eligible traditional employees. "The company and the union will agree on timing, size and scope of the offering," according to the highlighter. And members with 401(k)s will see the employer contribution increase to 10%, with no required member contribution. The highlighter also notes a program that will allow members to purchase GM stock through payroll deductions "in the near future." For its represented salaried GM workers, the union touted that for the first time ever it was able to negotiate general wage increases for the unit. "Not only did we get GWIs, we got them every year, and matched our hourly raises for a total of 25% over the life of the contract," the union said in the salaried highlighter. Gains at Ultium Cells If the deal is ratified, Ultium Cells workers would receive an immediate pay increase of at least $6 to $8 per hour, according to the highlighter. All new hires at Ultium would make a minimum of 75% of the maximum wage rate under the deal. Upon ratification of the deal, an Ultium worker making $20 per hour currently would see a 34% increase in pay to $26.91. By the end of the deal, that worker would go to $30.88 per hour. The Detroit News reported Friday that the contract will allow workers displaced by the 2019 closure of Lordstown Assembly Plant the opportunity to transfer to GM's nearby joint-venture battery plant in northeast Ohio. Should the deal be ratified, there would be a six-month window for former Lordstown employees working at the plant on Nov. 26, 2018, to apply to return and work for the GM and LG Energy Solution Ultium Cells LLC plant next door to the Lordstown facility GM closed after 50 years of production. Former workers who transfer would retain their current wages, benefits and seniority. Ultium worker Liz Lisk, who currently makes $23 per hour as a crew leader, said in a statement: "It's great we are included in the national agreement, but seems it was truly an afterthought and we aren't valued the same as current employees. Our top wage is $5 less than everyone else. And to top it off, ex-Lordstown employees can transfer to our plant and keep their higher wages. How is that fair to those of us that have been there through the growing pains." Ultium worker Johnny Pence was happy with the deal since the wage increases are "a far cry from where I started a year ago at $17." Pence currently makes $22 per hour on the night shift at the Ultium plant. Pence noted that others are "upset about not starting at the same wage as everyone else in the master," but in a statement he said he's "happy and shocked and thankful that we are even in the master. This sounded near impossible a few months ago."
|
What is the CPP anyway? And CBC News answers questions about how the Canada Pension Plan works and what Alberta could do Anis Heydari Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's government is looking into whether Alberta should leave the Canada Pension Plan. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press) The government of Alberta's plan to potentially create its own retirement plan and pull out of the Canada Pension Plan has prompted questions, concerns and confusion from any part of Canada that includes members of the existing CPP. At CBC News, readers, listeners and viewers have sent in questions or commented about what's proposed and what's to come. Here's some of what you wanted to know. What exactly is the CPP, anyway? The Canada Pension Plan began in the late 1960s as a nationwide pension scheme that took contributions from workers' paycheques to provide pensions upon retirement. Both employers and employees have been required by law to contribute to the CPP, except in Quebec where a separate QPP — the Quebec Pension Plan — was set up concurrently with CPP. Combined, employees and employers paid 11.4 per cent of a worker's wages into CPP in 2022, based on annual income between $3,500 and $64,900. Retirees can receive a pension starting as early as age 60. Contributions have gone up from just above 10 per cent in 2019 to closer to 12 per cent by 2023. "You all contribute with the understanding that when it comes your time to retire, you can expect your own steady stream of income where the risks are being managed directly by the plan," explained Sebastien Betermier, associate professor of finance at McGill University and executive director of the International Centre for Pension Management. Jim Dinning watches as Premier Danielle Smith speaks at the Sept. 21 release of a report about an Alberta pension plan. Dinning, a former provincial finance minister, heads an engagement panel that will hold a series of telephone town halls across Alberta to gauge support for the proposed plan. (Chris Schwarz/Government of Alberta) For CPP members, those risks have been managed by the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), an entity created in 1997 that is independent of the Government of Canada. The CPPIB manages $575 billion. According to its most recent annual report, it's had a net average return of nearly 10 per cent per year over the last decade, usually referred to as annualized return in the industry. It's also been ranked one of the top managed pension funds in the world. CPP funds are "kept separate from government funds" and neither provincial nor federal governments can access the money in the Canada Pension Plan. Betermier said his personal opinion is that the CPPIB would not want to have to sell off investments to be able to pay out Alberta for a theoretical departure. "The best way to generate efficiency as an asset manager is to invest over the long term.... What you do not want is a situation where from one year to the next, you're losing a big chunk of your capital because that's going to require you to sell quite a few of the assets," he said. How come Quebec can have their own pension plan but no one else can? The federal act that created the Canada Pension Plan allows provinces to leave. So, first of all, other provinces can have their own pension plans. In fact, any province that is not part of CPP must offer a comparable pension plan. Alberta is permitted to leave if it chooses, by giving three years' written notice. As for why Quebec has its own pension plan? "Quebec is not part of [CPP] because Quebec opted out at the beginning," said Edmonton-based lawyer Dennis Buchanan, who has publicly opposed the proposal to separate from the Canada Pension Plan. Lawyer Dennis Buchanan said Quebec and Alberta can't be compared when it comes to leaving the Canada Pension Plan, as Quebec was never in it. (Dennis Buchanan) Buchanan said it's fair to describe Alberta leaving the Canada Pension Plan as a type of metaphorical divorce. Quebec didn't have to divorce the CPP because it never got married, so to speak. "Alberta ends up having to go through a process for exiting [the CPP] because we're part of it. Quebec was never part of it," he said. Buchanan expects that if the government of Alberta tries to proceed with leaving the CPP under current demands that could amount to withdrawing more than half the value of the plan, it will end up in the courts and litigated. "I don't see the federal government or the other provinces being OK with that," he said. How would Alberta pulling their funds out impact other people's pensions? The multibillion-dollar question — that has no clear answer — is just how much "their funds" would be. The Government of Alberta, citing a report it commissioned by TELUS-owned Lifeworks, claims it would be entitled to more than half of the CPP's assets — or $334 billion by Jan. 1, 2027. However, their calculations have been disputed by independent experts such as University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe, who said if both Ontario and Alberta used the LifeWorks formula to leave the CPP, they'd withdraw more money than currently exists in the plan — a "potentially absurd outcome." In an analysis Tombe wrote last month, he said there is not enough publicly available data to definitively assess what an Alberta exit would mean, along with uncertainty about how the law would be interpreted. "There's fundamental ambiguity in the language of the act," the economist told Reuters. However, Tombe has also said in interviews with both CBC News and Reuters that CPP contributions could increase for Canadians outside of Alberta if it leaves the plan. Trevor Tombe is a professor of economics at the University of Calgary who has said non-Albertan contributions to the CPP could increase if Alberta leaves, depending on the conditions. (Erin Collins/CBC) Even if Alberta took less than it is suggesting — say, more than 22.5 per cent of the plan's existing assets — CPP contributions from everywhere else in the country may have to increase. And if Alberta were to take the 53 per cent proposed in its report, that could destabilize the fund entirely and would "dramatically" increase incentives for British Columbia and Ontario to also leave the CPP — and to do it quickly. Do benefits follow if Alberta Pension Plan members leave Alberta? Maybe. This would be subject to negotiation between Alberta and other jurisdictions after leaving the plan. While CPP has agreements with other plans, including Quebec, Alberta would be negotiating from scratch after departing the plan. "It's very unclear how portability might be affected if Alberta pulled out of the CPP," said Bill VanGorder, chief advocacy officer for the Canadian Association of Retired Persons. VanGorder, who is based in Halifax, used the example of someone who worked in Alberta but lived — or planned to live — in Nova Scotia in retirement, saying at this point it's unknown whether employment hours or contributions in one region would count toward a full pension in others. Why is CPP so low? We can't live on it Experts say the CPP was never intended to be a complete retirement income on its own, and that Canadians should not have this expectation, regardless of a potential Alberta separation from the plan. "It's supposed to represent about 25 per cent of your earnings [from] while you're working," said Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald, director of financial security research at Toronto Metropolitan University's National Institute on Ageing. According to MacDonald, the rest of Canadian retirement is meant to be funded by employer pension plans, private savings such as RRSPs or TFSAs, and the government's Old Age Security plan. MacDonald admits that because a large majority of Canadians do not have access to an employer pension plan or to sufficient private savings, a stable CPP is of critical importance to all members. Prime Minister Trudeau sends an open letter to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith warning of the consequences of pulling out of the Canada Pension Plan. The NDP drops a pharmacare ultimatum on the Liberals. Plus, Quebec’s plan to hike tuition fees for out-of-province students. Will Alberta pensions go up if the province leaves CPP? One of the potential benefits of an Alberta Pension Plan, as claimed by the United Conservative Party government, is the potential for increased benefits paid to Alberta seniors. Experts say this — like everything else at this point — is unclear but it may be unlikely in the long term, according to Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald. She pointed out that the amount of benefits paid out is going to be directly connected with how much money Alberta withdraws from the CPP. "The idea that by Alberta separating, they're going to automatically be receiving higher pensions is a big assumption because nobody's agreed to what that number should be. And that would really be the first step to actually start then discussing how much the pensions would change," she said. Federal Finance Minister Chystia Freeland will meet with provincial and territorial counterparts over Alberta's proposal to leave the Canada Pension Plan. (CBC News) Finance ministers from across the country plan to meet to discuss Alberta's proposal later this week. So what's next? Alberta has said it could hold a provincial referendum on withdrawing from the CPP as early as 2025, but Premier Danielle Smith has said she'd need a number on how much Alberta would be able to withdraw from the plan first. According to the first major poll conducted since Smith began making the pitch to take Alberta out of the CPP, the proposal is widely opposed by Albertans.
|
Detroit Three start calling Jordyn Grzelewski Breana Noble Detroit Three autoworkers who were on strike or laid off as a result of the United Auto Workers' work stoppage are starting to return to work after tentative agreements were reached between the union and all three automakers. Ford Motor Co. said in an update Monday night that all of its workers who had been on strike had returned to work and that it was in the process of calling back to work thousands who had been laid off at other plants. Ford last week became the first of the Detroit automakers to reach a tentative agreement on a new four-and-a-half-year contract with the UAW; Stellantis NV followed over the weekend and General Motors Co. reached an agreement Monday. Pending ratification votes by rank-and-file members in the next couple of weeks, the UAW agreed to immediately send members back to work. Still, auto executives and industry experts have said it will take weeks to fully restart production as the companies work to ramp operations back up to previous levels of output and re-engage suppliers who, in a tight labor market, may have to replace workers who left. "The restart of this will be complex. We've got to bring back up operations that have been shut down. And we have to do it promptly but safely and without, most importantly, sacrificing quality," John Lawler, Ford's chief financial officer, said during the company's third-quarter earnings release last week. "Companies throughout our supply chain are going to have to do the same thing. And in many cases, our suppliers will have to rebuild at least a portion of their workforce where people left for other jobs." As of Monday, Ford said it had called back about 94% of the nearly 20,000 workers who were either on strike or laid off. That includes all of the 16,613 workers who were on strike at assembly plants in Chicago, Louisville and Wayne, and 1,949 of the 3,167 workers who were laid off at 10 plants. Meanwhile, as of Sunday night’s third shift, about 15,800 Stellantis employees had been recalled to work, spokesperson Jodi Tinson said in an email, after the union ended a 44-day strike against the automaker Saturday night. Stellantis’ chief financial officer, Natalie Knight, during a financial results call on Tuesday said the walkout had cost it less than $800 million in net income, 50,000 produced vehicles and $3.2 billion in revenue. GM on Tuesday didn’t have specifics on employees being recalled after the UAW officially ended its strike against the Detroit automaker Monday afternoon. “Our manufacturing plants and parts distribution centers that had been shut down,” spokesperson David Barnas said in a statement, “are working to safely restart operations over the next 12 to 24 hours.” The UAW's unprecedented, simultaneous, targeted strike of Ford, GM and Stellantis ended Monday after 46 days with the announcement of a tentative agreement with GM. The agreements, which are largely similar to one another, include 25% in base wage increases through April 2028. The top wage rate is slated to cumulatively rise by 33% to more than $42 an hour when accounting for cost-of-living adjustments, according to the UAW. The deals also eliminate several wage tiers; restore COLA; reduce the time it takes to reach the top of the wage scale from eight years to three; improve wages and benefits for temporary workers; give workers the right to strike over plant closures; and include improvements to pensions and 401(k)s. Ford's deal includes $8.1 billion in product commitments and plant investments; further highlights of the Stellantis and GM deals will be rolled out later this week. |
Unifor reaches tentative The Canadian Press Unifor announced Monday it has reached a tentative deal with Stellantis, ending a brief strike at the automaker. More than 8,200 workers represented by Unifor had walked off the job at Stellantis facilities in Canada after the two sides failed to reach a deal by a Sunday deadline, however the union and the company continued to negotiate through the night. The union said that while the strike was brief, it was an "important act of solidarity and determination." Unifor Local 444 members were at the union hall on Friday, Oct. 27, 2023, preparing for a possible strike action that could begin Monday if a deal is not reached by 11:59 p.m. Sunday. (Chris Campbell/CTV News Windsor) "It demonstrated the strength of our union and provided your bargaining team with the means to achieve a tentative agreement that meets both the core economic demands in the union’s pattern agreement and our Stellantis specific demands," Unifor national president Lana Payne, Stellantis master bargaining chairperson James Stewart and Vito Beato, Stellantis master bargaining acting vice-chairperson, said in statement. The deal with the automaker behind such brands as Fiat, Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep comes after Unifor reached earlier agreements with Ford Motor Co. and General Motors. A strike by Unifor at GM also lasted less than a day. Stellantis North America chief operating officer Mark Stewart said he was proud of the negotiating teams and thankful for their commitment. "Once ratified, this agreement will reward our 8,000 represented employees and protect the long-term health of our Canadian operations," Stewart said in a statement. Details of the Stellantis agreement were not immediately available, but Unifor had been seeking the automaker to agree to the same core economic terms the union reached with the other big companies. The union said last week it was also working on specifics from Stellantis on its electric vehicle plans for its Canadian plants. Union members at Ford and GM ratified deals that will see workers get close to 20 per cent wage gains over three years, among numerous other improvements. In the U.S., Stellantis had seen escalating strikes over the past six weeks from United Auto Workers members at its operations there, but the company reached a tentative deal with the union as of Saturday. |
Unifor sends 8,200 Stellantis Breana Noble Jordyn Grzelewski Some 8,200 Stellantis workers were called to strike minutes after the automaker and the Canadian autoworkers union Unifor reached an 11:59 p.m. bargaining deadline Sunday. A bargaining update from union leaders, including Unifor President Lana Payne, instructed Stellantis workers in Canada to report for their next regularly-scheduled shift to receive instructions from their strike captain. Still, the leaders said negotiators would continue discussions throughout the night and said that progress had been made in the talks. “We are extremely disappointed,” Stellantis said in a statement provided by spokesperson LouAnn Gosselin. “We will continue to bargain in good faith until an agreement is reached. We look forward to getting everyone back to work as soon as possible.” Unifor had instituted the deadline for the negotiations ahead of resuming talks with the maker of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram vehicles on Oct. 18 after workers at General Motors Co. in Canada ratified a deal with 80.5% support. The union said in a social media post about 10:15 p.m. Sunday that negotiations "continue with progress being made" and to "stay tuned for further updates." In an update on Friday, Payne said progress was slow after the company proposed "concessions" compared to the pattern adopted by Ford and GM, thought talks had picked up that day. Sticking points mentioned by Payne included increased pension contributions, protections for salaried bargaining-unit workers, anti-outsourcing measures for parts distribution workers and the extension of bargaining rights to workers at the automaker's NextStar Energy joint-venture battery manufacturing plant with LG Energy Solution that is expected to launch production in the first quarter of 2024. At Ford and GM, Unifor secured three-year deals with wage increases of 10% in year one, 2% in year two and 3% in year three; cost-of-living adjustments; a halved timeline of four years to the top wage; increased contributions to pensions and a new quarterly Universal Health Care Allowance for retirees. The union extended talks beyond the contract expiration at Ford to reach a deal on Sept. 19. Workers there ratified the agreement with 54% support on Sept. 24. Unifor did strike GM's plants for about 13 hours on Oct. 10 before the Detroit automaker agreed to follow its crosstown rival's pattern, putting the walkout on hold. The autoworkers there ratified their contract on Oct. 15. ************************************************************ Unifor says tentative deal reached Kerri Breen · CBC · Posted: Oct 30, 2023 A tentative deal has been reached between Unifor and Stellantis for its Canadian plants and workers, according to the union. In an emailed statement sent at 7:40 a.m., Unifor's director of communications, Kathleen O'Keefe said, "A tentative agreement has been reached with Stellantis ending strike action at all Unifor facilities." |
UAW announces tentative Breana Noble Marnie Muñoz Sterling Heights — The United Auto Workers and Stellantis NV have reached a tentative agreement, ending a 44-day strike at the maker of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram vehicles, the UAW confirmed in a video posted to social media Saturday evening. The four-and-a-half-year agreement mirrors the economics of the tentative deal the union reached with Ford Motor Co. earlier this week, according to the union, which championed that the agreement would add 5,000 jobs and represents $19 billion in U.S. investments. The deal ultimately will have to be approved by a majority vote of the rank-and-file members at Stellantis. The UAW National Stellantis Council will vote whether to send the agreement to members on Thursday when an update with more details will be shared. The deal includes product allocation for most U.S. plants, including a midsize pickup truck at the Belvidere, Illinois, assembly plant that Stellantis idled earlier this year, UAW Vice President Rich Boyer said in the video. The automaker also committed new product to Trenton Engine, protecting jobs there, and to Toledo Machining, which would double the workforce there. Saturday was the 44th day of the union's strike against Stellantis and General Motors Co., the same number of days as the original sit-down strike against GM in Flint for which this year's targeted "stand-up" strike against the Detroit Three was named. "Once again, we've achieved what just weeks ago, we were told was impossible," UAW President Shawn Fain said in a recorded video update posted to social media in which he stated the company had been looking to cut close to 5,000 jobs when bargaining began. "The power of the stand-up strike cannot be understated. ... We have begun to turn the tide on the war on the American working class, and we truly are saving the American dream." Mark Stewart, Stellantis' chief operating officer in North America, said in a statement that out of respect for the ratification process, the company would refrain from commenting on the details of the contract until they are shared with UAW members. The automaker, however, will provide a financial update on Tuesday when it reports its third-quarter shipments and revenues before stock markets open in Europe. "Today, as we announce that we have reached a tentative agreement with the UAW on a new labor contract, I would like to thank all the negotiating teams who have worked tirelessly for many weeks to get to this point," Stewart said. "We look forward to welcoming our 43,000 employees back to work and resuming operations to serve our customers and execute our Dare Forward 2030 strategic plan to maintain Stellantis’ position at the forefront of innovation." Stellantis and GM made new offers late this week that match a 25% raise over the course of Ford's agreement reached Wednesday that would expire in April 2028. Negotiations with GM were ongoing Saturday when the union called GM's Spring Hill Assembly Plant in Tennessee out on strike, joining nearly 15,000 other members. The 25% at Stellantis breaks down to an immediate 11% wage increase upon ratification; 3% hikes in 2024, '25 and '26; and 5% in '27, according to two sources familiar with the deal who spoke to The Detroit News on the condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak on the subject publicly. Stellantis' top pay currently is $31.77 per hour compared to $32.32 at Ford and General Motors Co. The breakdown would bring the pay to $40.46 per hour at Stellantis by the end of the contract. There also would be a $5,000 ratification bonus. With reinstituted cost-of-living adjustments that were suspended in 2009, the union estimated the top wage will rise 33% to more than $42 per hour. The starting wage will increase by 67% compounded with estimated COLA, to more than $30 an hour. Supplemental workers would be converted to full-time before the end of nine months, Fain said. The Stellantis agreement would convert more than 3,200 supplemental current workers to full-time, according to two sources. Supplemental starting pay would be $21 per hour. "The amount of money we won in gains for temporary workers in this contract," Fain said, "is more than the total amount in gains we won for everyone in the 2019 agreement. ... The days of low wage, unstable jobs at the Big Three are coming to an end." These lowest-paid workers would see a raise of more than 165% over the life of the agreement, according to the union. Bringing Mopar parts distribution workers up to production pay would mean some of those employees see an immediate 76% increase upon ratification. Stellantis also would extend the automaker's new car lease program, currently available to management, to workers with at least one year of experience, according to the two sources. "We truly believe that we got every penny possible out of this company," Fain said. "We left nothing on the table." Stellantis had more than 14,000 UAW members on picket lines at two assembly plants in Sterling Heights and Toledo, Ohio, and parts distribution centers across the country. Close to 10,000 General Motors Co. workers remain on strike. Hundreds more workers at both companies had been laid off because of the downtime. The union had elevated its strike against both Stellantis and GM this week. On Monday, the UAW directed 6,800 members at Stellantis' Ram 1500 plant in Sterling Heights to go on strike. On Tuesday, hours after GM said the strike had cost it $800 million, the UAW sent out another 5,000 workers at its most profitable plant in Arlington, Texas, which makes full-size SUVs. "Taking down that Ram 1500 plant helped put more pressure on them, because they can’t afford to lose that much revenue," said Art Wheaton, an automotive industry specialist at Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School who has performed training for the UAW, GM and Ford. "There would be too much of a cost disadvantage, especially with Ford getting production back up. The purpose of the pattern always has been the other two would follow suit.” The UAW's negotiations with the two automakers intensified after Ford and the union reached a "historic" tentative deal to end a 41-day strike targeting selected plants at the Dearborn automaker, particularly the Blue Oval's profit engine known as Kentucky Truck Plant, home to Ford's Super Duty pickups and full-size Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator SUVs. Like the Ford agreement, the Stellantis deal more than doubled the value of the automaker's original proposal and included gains valued at more than four times what workers received in the 2019 contract, according to the union. It provides more in base wage increases than Stellantis workers have received in the past 22 years. Following after Ford, it would take full-time Stellantis workers three years to get to the top wage. The agreement also would increase retirement contributions for current retirees, workers with pensions, and those who have 401(k) plans. The Stellantis deal also includes a right to strike over plant closures as well as a right to strike over product and investment commitments, a first for the union. President Joe Biden and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer both praised the agreement in statements issued Saturday evening. "This groundbreaking contract rewards the autoworkers who sacrificed so much to revive our auto industry with record raises, more paid leave, greater retirement security, and more rights and respect at work," Biden said. "This contract is a testament to the power of unions and collective bargaining to build strong middle-class jobs while helping our most iconic American companies thrive." Whitmer said: "This agreement will raise wages for workers and shore up the company’s footprint in Michigan. ... Let’s build on our momentum and ratify these agreements so Michiganders can get back to doing what they do best — making the world’s best cars and trucks." The UAW Ford National Council on Sunday will vote on whether to send its tentative agreement to the 56,000 members at the Blue Oval. A Facebook Live update for members with more details is expected that evening. The full ratification process could take two to three weeks. Stellantis workers react Flin Fike, 57, of Farmington Hills, who works in skilled trades at Sterling Heights Assembly Plant, said he wishes the 25% wage increase would come all at once given the increases in inflation over the past few years. "It seems like it would be a better gratitude toward us," the 36-year UAW member said. "Because it’s like making us wait. Eleven percent is really only a $3 raise." Tomas Rangel, 33, a worker at the Sterling Heights plant, said he was excited to hear about the deal, especially the wage increases, and hopes that the membership ratifies it. "It would mean a lot," said Rangel, who lives in southwest Detroit. "It would mean more chance of not living paycheck to paycheck. More chance to buy a home and things like that." Plant worker Brandon Davis, 37, of Warren, has worked at the Sterling Heights facility for just over five years, installing dashboards and connecting wires in Ram pickups produced at the plant. Davis said the top thing he's looking for in the deal is significant improvement in wages so he can someday buy a house and treat his kids to restaurant meals and bounce house visits. "As long as it's better than last contract and it makes a substantial increase to pay, I'm probably voting yes on it," he said. "But we'll see when the details come out." Rickey Lawrence Jr., 26, lives about a mile from the plant, where he has worked for five years. He's hoping the tentative contract requires the automaker to upgrade temporary part-time workers to permanent full-time status faster. He said his girlfriend was a part-time stamping facility worker and went a long time without being scheduled for shifts. "I came in, I was part-time for a couple months or something, then they rolled me over," he said. "But she was part-time for over a year. That's not fair to me." The deals' possible impacts Ford on Thursday said the agreement is expected to add about $850 to $900 per vehicle to its labor costs. "Shawn Fain has achieved a stunning victory in 2023,” said economist Pat Anderson, CEO of Lansing-based Anderson Economic Group which specializes in the auto industry, of the Ford agreement. “He completely controlled the public debate and proclaimed victory on his timeline. The UAW has reset the playing field. The industry will not go back to bargaining the way they had for generations before this.” Anderson sees the Ford deal being largely adopted by GM and Stellantis. “But there are two serious consequences of this unequivocal UAW victory. First, the rhetoric that Fain used declaring automakers the enemy will have long-tern negative consequences. And, two: Costs are reaching the point of no return and investments will be canceled. We already have acknowledgement of that fact from GM, Ford and Stelantis that have begun pushing back manufacturing plans.” Stellantis in December announced that it was idling at the end of February its Belvidere Assembly Plant, about 70 miles northwest of Chicago, citing the cost of electric vehicles and a microchip shortage. The change in status of the plant affected 1,350 salaried and hourly workers. Boyer confirmed Belvidere would be getting new product in the form of a midsize pickup truck on two shifts and a battery plant, which he said would bring "thousands" of jobs to the Illinois city, including more than 1,000 alone at the battery plant. A Mopar parts distribution hub would open there, as well, two sources said. "My plant was idled, and now we're out here doing this," Alfonso Galindo, 44, of Sylvania, Ohio, who transferred to Stellantis' Toledo Assembly Plant in July after Belvidere idled, said on the picket line on Saturday morning. "I'd love to go back." Boyer said workers who wish to return to Belvidere will have the right to do so, and those who lost their jobs at the plant without transferring elsewhere will be on temporary layoff and eligible for supplemental unemployment and health-care benefits until the Illinois factory gets back up and running. There are risks with making the agreement at Stellantis before the Ford deal is ratified, experts said. UAW members at Mack Trucks Inc. earlier this month rejected a tentative agreement and hit the picket lines. Such a move could wreak havoc for the automakers. But the offered raise and benefits in the record agreement with Ford are greater than what was initially offered to the Mack workers. Ratification at Ford could be a two- to three-week process, one of the reasons members there were sent home from the picket lines once the union announced the deal. "There are risks, but they outweigh the cost of prolonging this strike," said Marick Masters, a a management professor at Wayne State University. "The union knew it wasn’t going to get a much better deal out of this strike. It's fish or cut bait at this point in time and give the membership a chance to vote." Plus, the weather is getting colder for members on the picket lines, and high interest rates and consumer prices are hitting pocketbooks for those receiving the $500 per week strike stipend, Cornell's Wheaton said. Since Sept. 15, workers at Stellantis' Toledo Assembly Plant, home of the Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator, had been on strike. Workers on the picket line Saturday morning said they were hesitant to give resounding approval to the deal reached with Ford without all of the specifics, but several said they were ready to get back to work. "Twenty-five percent and COLA? That sounds pretty good," said Sonny Lizcano, 32, of Toledo, a 12-year UAW member. "But I want to see the full details." The union didn't mention anything about extending health-care coverage in retirement for workers hired after 2007. Several workers cited that as a concern, noting the toll working in the plants takes on their bodies. "If I need to make ends meet, I always can get a part-time job," said Amanda Smith, 48 of Toledo, a 10-year UAW member. The health-care coverage "is what I need to be able to retire." The team in the plant's paint shop on the picket line was celebrating with cupcakes the Sunday birthday of Lashanda Johnson, 52, of Toledo. Johnson said she normally celebrates a birthday weekend by traveling. "I'm being responsible this year," the UAW member for almost 30 years said. "We have to be out here to be able to afford things like travel with the economy and prices the way they are."
|
Ford details UAW strike impact, Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. on Thursday detailed the financial impacts of the 41-day United Auto Workers strike that was called off just hours before, and revealed a further slowdown in its electric-vehicle rollout due to market dynamics. The Dearborn automaker reported taking a $1.3 billion hit to its earnings as a result of the strike and withdrew its earnings guidance for the rest of the year, pending ratification of the tentative agreement on a new labor contract it reached with the union Wednesday night. Meanwhile, executives said they are pushing back some $12 billion in planned spending on the company's EV strategy and delaying the launch of one of two joint-venture battery plants it's building in Kentucky with South Korean battery manufacturer SK On. Overall, the company delivered what executives characterized as "mixed" results for the July-September period, with results dragged down by the strike and nagging cost and quality issues. Ford reported $1.2 billion in profit on revenue of $43.8 billion for the quarter. The profits compare to a loss of $827 million in the same period last year. Revenue was 11% higher than a year ago. Adjusted earnings stood at $2.2 billion for the quarter, up from $1.8 billion a year ago. Ford Blue, the company's internal combustion engine and hybrid vehicle business, posted earnings of $1.7 billion. Ford Pro, the commercial vehicle business, reported nearly $1.7 billion in earnings. And Ford Model e, the business unit dedicated to electric vehicles and software, posted an earnings loss of $1.3 billion, which the company attributed to "continued investment in next-generation EVs and challenging market dynamics." Ford posted $9.4 billion in adjusted earnings before interest and taxes through the third quarter. The company had previously said it expected to have adjusted earnings of between $11 billion and $12 billion for the full year. The company now says that while it "had been poised to delivery profitability within that range," it is withdrawing its guidance due to the effects of the UAW strike and while ratification of the deal is pending. Strike impact John Lawler, Ford's chief financial officer, reported that the strike negatively affected the company's adjusted earnings by $100 million in the third quarter. In total, through last week, it cost the company about 80,000 units of production and $1.3 billion in earnings. The company expects to provide an update on expectations for 2023 results after an agreement is ratified and production is back up and running. Lawler also said that while the strike is over, disruptions will continue to be felt as Ford and its network of suppliers begin the complex process of restarting operations at the three assembly plants that were on strike. The strikes at Ford's Chicago, Kentucky and Michigan assembly plants affected production at numerous other Ford facilities, as well. “The restart of this will be complex," Lawler said. "We’ve got to bring back up operations that have been shut down, and we need to do it promptly but safely and without, most importantly, sacrificing quality.” He declined to comment on the total cost of the tentative agreement to Ford and other specifics ahead of ratification by members, but said that it is expected to add about $850 to $900 per unit to the company's labor costs. The company also expects an impact of about 60 to 70 basis points of margin. The impact means that Ford must find ways to boost productivity and deliver efficiencies throughout the company, Lawler said, but "there's no doubt" that the company will remain profitable. “This is something we’re gonna have to work on," he said. "But … we’re seeing inflation. And when you’re in a period of inflation, you have to pay your people, because it puts a hardship on them. And then you as a company have to go out and find a way to operate more efficiently, increase your productivity and eliminate waste. And that’s what we need to do going forward.” The tentative agreement includes 25% in base wage increases through April 2028 and will raise the top wage, now $32.32 an hour, by over 30% to more than $40 an hour, and raise the starting wage by 68%, to over $28 an hour over the life of the contract, according to the union. Workers will receive an immediate 11% wage increase upon ratification. Also included are cost-of-living adjustments and a reduction in the time for new workers to reach the top wage scale from eight years to three years. The deal also includes improvements for current retirees, workers with pensions, and those who have 401(k) plans. It also includes a right to strike over plant closures. The agreement brings the UAW's unprecedented simultaneous strike of all three Detroit automakers closer to a resolution, as negotiations continue with rivals General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV and a ratification vote on the Ford deal is expected in the coming weeks. The targeted strike sent more than 45,000 autoworkers from eight assembly plants and 38 parts distribution centers to picket lines. About 20,000 Ford workers are now being sent back to work. EV slowdown Meanwhile, Thursday's report included further signals and confirmation that the EV transition is encountering some bumps in the road. Lawler emphasized that while consumer adoption of EVs continues to grow, it's at a slower pace than what Ford and others in the industry initially expected, prompting some pullback in plans. Ford already had taken steps such as pushing back some of its EV production targets and pausing a planned $3.5 billion investment to build an EV battery plant in Marshall, which the company said Thursday it is still "reevaluating." Lawler also revealed Thursday that Ford plans to push back about $12 billion in planned EV investments after determining it wouldn't need additional capacity in the near term. The company also has reduced some production of its electric Mustang Mach-E. “Given the dynamic EV environment, we are being judicious about our production and adjusting future capacity to better match market demand," Lawler said. Still, executives reiterated the company's plans to launch a second generation of EVs and that development work continues on a third generation. CFRA Research, an investment research firm, on Thursday reiterated its "hold" opinion on Ford's stock and reduced its 12-month price target to $12 from $13 per share. "While we think the new labor deal will be ratified, we view the concessions the company made as significant and they will weigh on margins and affect its competitiveness relative to Tesla and other non-union automakers," Garrett Nelson, senior equity analyst at CFRA Research, wrote in a note. "Comps should also turn much less favorable in 2024 and we see a higher-for-longer interest rate scenario hurting sales volumes." |
Autoworkers reach a deal with Story by The Canadian Press DETROIT (AP) — The United Auto Workers union said Wednesday it has reached a tentative contract agreement with Ford that could be a breakthrough toward ending the nearly 6-week-old strikes against Detroit automakers. The four-year deal, which still has to be approved by 57,000 union members at the company, could bring a close to the union’s series of strikes at targeted factories run by Ford, General Motors and Jeep maker Stellantis. The Ford deal could set the pattern for agreements with the other two automakers, where workers will remain on strike. The UAW called on all workers at Ford to return to their jobs and said that will put pressure on GM and Stellantis to bargain. Announcements on how to do that will come later. “We told Ford to pony up, and they did,” President Shawn Fain said in a video address to members. “We won things no one thought possible.” He added that Ford put 50% more money on the table than it did before the strike started on Sept. 15. UAW Vice President Chuck Browning, the chief negotiator with Ford, said workers will get a 25% general wage increase, plus cost of living raises that will put the pay increase over 30%, to above $40 per hour for top-scale assembly plant workers by the end of the contract. Previously Ford, Stellantis and General Motors had all offered 23% pay increases. When the talks started Ford offered 9%. Assembly workers will get 11% upon ratification, almost equal to all of the wage increases workers have seen since 2007, Browning said. Typically, during past auto strikes, a UAW deal with one automaker has led to the other companies matching it with their own settlements. GM said in a statement it is "working constructively" with the union to reach an agreement as soon as possible. Stellantis also said it's committed to reaching a deal “that gets everyone back to work as soon as possible.” Browning said temporary workers will get more in wage increases than they have over the past 22 years combined. Temporary workers will get raises over 150% and retirees will get annual bonuses, he said. “Thanks to the power of our members on the picket line and the threat of more strikes to come, we have won the most lucrative agreement per member since Walter Reuther was president,” Browning said. Reuther led the union from 1946 until his death in 1970. Fain said that the union’s national leadership council of local union presidents and bargaining chairs will travel Sunday to Detroit, where they’ll get a presentation on the agreement and vote on whether to recommend it to members. Sunday evening the union will host a Facebook Live video appearance and later will hold regional meetings to explain the deal to members. While on the picket line at Ford’s Michigan Assembly Plant west of Detroit Wednesday night, local union leaders invited workers across the road to the union hall for a briefing on the deal. As they trickled out of the building, many were smiling and most were relieved. “It’s an emotional time for me. I’m emotional,” worker Keith Jurgelewicz said as his eyes welled up with tears. “But just super excited that this is over with. I just can’t wait to get back to work and just get on with my life.” Jurgelewicz said he is happy that the end of the strike came during his shift on the picket lines, where he has faithfully appeared for all of his shifts. “Hopefully, GM and Stellantis can get their deals done. … Historic day for us,” he said. In a statement, President Joe Biden, who had visited GM picketers near Detroit early in the strikes and has billed himself the most union-friendly president in American history, praised the settlement. “I’ve always believed the middle class built America and unions built the middle class,” Biden said. “This tentative agreement is a testament to the power of employers and employees coming together to work out their differences at the bargaining table in a manner that helps businesses succeed while helping workers secure pay and benefits they can raise a family on.” Workers with pensions also will see increases for when they retire, and those hired after 2007 with 401(k) plans will get large increases, Browning said. For the first time, the union will have the right to go on strike over company plans to close factories, he said. “That means they can't keep devastating our communities and closing plants with no consequences,” Browning said. “Together we have made history.” Ford said it is pleased to have reached the deal, and said it would focus on restarting the huge Kentucky Truck Plant in Louisville, as well as the Chicago Assembly Plant. The Louisville plant alone employs 8,700 workers and makes high profit heavy duty F-Series pickup trucks and big truck-based SUVs. In all, 20,000 workers will be coming back on the job and shipping the company’s full lineup of vehicles to customers, Ford said. Ford’s statement made no mention of the cost of the contract. Company executives said last week they were at the limit of what they could pay while still being able to invest in new vehicles and the transition from internal combustion to electric vehicles. All three companies have said they don't want to be saddled with high labor costs that could limit their ability to invest in future vehicles and potentially force them to raise prices. “This agreement sets us on a new path to make things right at Ford, at the Big Three, and across the auto industry. Together, we are turning the tide for the working class in this country,” Fain said. Associated Press Writer Mike Householder contributed from Wayne, Michigan. Tom Krisher, The Associated Press |
UAW says 'more to be won' despite Michael Wayland
DETROIT – The United Auto Workers union believes there is "more to be won" in ongoing contract negotiations with the Detroit automakers following five weeks of labor strikes against the companies, UAW President Shawn Fain said Friday. His comments come despite record contract offers from General Motors, Ford Motor and Stellantis that now include 23% hourly pay increases and other significantly enhanced benefits during the terms of the four and a half-year deal. "There is more to be won," Fain said during an online broadcast. "These are already record contracts, but they come at the end of decades of record decline. So it's not enough to be the best ever, when auto workers have gone backwards over the last two decades. That's a very low bar." Despite Fain's comments, the union did not announce additional strikes Friday against any of the companies. He said the "bottom line is we've got cards left to play, and they've got money left to spend." Fain did not address a Friday report by Bloomberg that the union has asked for a 25% increase in general wages. The union has not announced any additional strikes since initiating an unexpected walkout on Oct. 11 at Ford's Kentucky Truck Plant that produces highly profitable pickup trucks and SUVs. That's despite Ford having the best proposal regarding economics, as outlined Friday by Fain. Fain spent quite a notable amount of time during the online broadcast discussing how the union plans to use these talks to assist in organizing non-union plans. He also heavily criticized the Monday comments of Ford Chair Bill Ford to bring an end to the negotiations. "Bill Ford said it shouldn't be Ford versus the UAW. He said it should be the UAW and Ford against foreign automakers," Fain said. "I want to be crystal clear on one thing: The days of the UAW and Ford being a team to fight other companies are over ... Non-union autoworkers are not the enemy. Those are our future union family." Ford said it remains "eager to conclude these negotiations with a contract" that benefits its workers, citing it's "good that Mr. Fain acknowledged Ford's contract offer 'already' is a record and remains the best one on the table." Stellantis said the sides "continue to be productive, building on the momentum from the past several weeks," but declined to discuss specific details. GM declined to comment regarding Fain's comments, citing details it released of its most recent offer earlier Friday. The UAW hasn't expanded strikes at GM since Sept. 29 or at Stellantis since Sept. 22, despite offers made this week not meeting details of Ford's proposal from last week and Fain last week saying the union was initiating a "new phase" of strikes and contract negotiations. "Right before a deal is when there's the most aggressive push for that last mile. They just want to wait us out," Fain said. "They want division. They want fear. They want uncertainty. And what we have is our solidarity." The strike at Ford's Kentucky plant — responsible for $25 billion in revenue annually — marked a major escalation in the UAW's targeted, or "stand-up," strikes. It also represents a shift in strategy, as Fain had previously publicly announced the targets before the work stoppages occurred. The UAW has been gradually increasing the strikes since the work stoppages began after the sides failed to reach tentative agreements by Sept 14. About 34,000 U.S. automakers with the companies, or roughly 23% of UAW members covered by the expired contracts with the Detroit automakers, were on strike. Here are details of current proposals by the companies to UAW:
|
Unifor sets Oct. 29 as strike October 19, 2023 'We also have the added challenge of negotiating future product commitments for the Brampton Assembly,' says Unifor President Lana Payne Unifor will restart talks with Stellantis on Wednesday, six weeks after the union put bargaining with the automaker on hold as it concentrated on securing new contracts with Ford Motor Co. and General Motors. It also set a strike deadline, giving the automaker until 11:59 p.m. on Oct. 29 to agree to a deal or face a walkout. The union said it is “looking forward” to locking in a deal that matches the pattern set by collective agreements with the other two members of the Detroit Three, while making “additional gains” on workplace issues specific to Stellantis. “We also have the added challenge of negotiating future product commitments for the Brampton Assembly plant that secures a future for all of our Stellantis members in the EV transition,” Unifor President Lana Payne said in a release. Unifor represents about 8,200 Stellantis workers at nine workplaces across Canada. The majority work at assembly plants in Windsor and Brampton, Ont. As in its deals with Ford and GM, Unifor is seeking roughly 20-per-cent wage increases for longtime workers over a three-year term, bonuses of $10,000 for full-time staff and a compression of the wage grid that allows workers to climb the pay scale in four instead of eight years. “Our bargaining team is fully committed to negotiating a strong agreement that delivers on the core priorities set by our members and ensures that unionized autoworkers continue to set the highest standards for all manufacturing workers in Canada,” James Stewart, Stellantis master bargaining chairperson, said in a statement. As union negotiators battle the company for the desired contract terms, Unifor’s national office is also feeling internal pressure from Local 444 President Dave Cassidy, who represents workers at the Windsor Assembly Plant. Cassidy has repeatedly said his local members are not satisfied with the pattern set at Ford and GM, and has telegraphed he may push members to break pattern to pursue a better deal. To date, Unifor leadership has rejected any calls to make changes to the core tenets of its agreement and expressed faith in its pattern bargaining strategy. The company says it's set to resume talks following the weekslong hiatus. “We look forward to productive ongoing discussions with Unifor and are confident we will reach an agreement that both rewards the contributions of our employees, as well as ensures our future competitiveness in today's rapidly evolving industry,” Stellantis spokeswoman LouAnn Gosselin said in an email. |
|
Ford Executive Chair Bill Ford Tom Krisher, DETROIT (AP) — Ford Motor Co. Executive Chairman Bill Ford called on autoworkers to come together to end a monthlong strike that he says could cost the company the ability to invest in the future. In a rare speech during contract talks in the company's hometown of Dearborn, Michigan, Ford said high labor costs could limit spending to develop new vehicles and invest in factories. “It’s the absolute lifeblood of our company. And if we lose it, we will lose to the competition. America loses. Many jobs will be lost,” said the great grandson of company founder Henry Ford. The company, he said, builds more vehicles in America and has more United Auto Workers employees than any company, which has increased its costs in a highly competitive industry. Ford has 57,000 UAW workers compared with 46,000 at GM and 43,000 at Stellantis. “Many of our competitors moved jobs to Mexico as we added jobs here in the U.S.,” Ford said. The company is near an impasse with the United Auto Workers union, which walked out in targeted strikes at all three Detroit automakers on Sept. 15, Last week 8,700 union members walked out at the largest and most profitable Ford plant in the world, the Kentucky Truck Plant in Louisville. Ford said the strike at the Kentucky plant is harming tens of thousands of Americans who work for parts suppliers and Ford dealers. The strike also could cause a fragile parts supply base to collapse, he said. “If it continues, it will have a major impact on the American economy and devastate local communities,” he said. There was no response from the UAW on Monday when The Associated Press sought comment. Bill Ford, only the fourth family member to lead the 120-year-old company, said he has watched other countries lose their auto industries, then all of their manufacturing base. He said strong American manufacturing is essential for national security. “We need to come together to bring an end to this acrimonious round of talks,” Ford said. “I still believe in a bright future – one that we can build together. I still believe the automobile industry is a major force for good in our country. We will continue to be there when America needs us most.” Last week, after the Kentucky strike began, a top Ford executive said on a conference call with reporters that Ford had reached the limit in how much it was willing to spend to end the strike. At the Ford Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne west of Detroit, few workers are on the picket lines Monday afternoon said they listened to Ford’s speech. When told what Ford said about investing in the future, line worker Steve Applebee said he agreed. “I get that,” he said. “I can see both sides.” But he also said Ford is paying CEO Jim Farley $21 million per year when starting pay for Ford factory workers is up only about $3 per hour from when he started with the company 31 years ago. Ford’s offer of a 23% general wage increase barely covers inflation over the last three or four years, said Applebee, 59. Carlos Hollins 47, of Detroit, who just started with Ford in July and is at the low end of the pay scale, said workers gave up raises in 2008 when Ford and the others were in financial trouble. They were promised that concessions would be restored when the company recovered. “We shouldn’t have to suffer, especially for the retirees,” he said. “they need to pay us what we deserve.” The union has said retirees haven’t received a pension increase for at least a decade. Hollis says workers should get everything they are asking for, and Ford has enough money to pay it. The speech from Ford arrives with the entire auto industry making a historic and expensive shift from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles. UAW President Shawn Fain has said Ford and crosstown rivals General Motors and Jeep maker Stellantis are making billions in profits, and that workers should get a share. He says the workers should be repaid for sacrificing general pay raises, cost of living adjustments and agreeing to lower wage tiers to keep the companies afloat during the Great Recession. The union began striking at targeted factories after its contracts with the companies expired. It started picketing one assembly plant from each company, but that has since spread to 38 parts warehouses at GM and Jeep maker Stellantis. The UAW later added another assembly plant at both GM and Ford and on Wednesday, Fain made the surprise announcement that the union would walk out at the Kentucky plant, which makes Super Duty pickups and large Ford and Lincoln SUVs. About 34,000 of the union's 146,000 employees at all three automakers are now on strike. The seemingly widening labor rift suggests Ford and the union may be in for a lengthy strike that could cost the company and its workers billions of dollars. The union has said Ford’s general wage offer is up to 23% over four years and that it has reinstated cost of living raises. GM and Stellantis were at 20%. But Fain said none was high enough. |
Unifor's pattern bargaining 'There’s no question they’re organizing to push to break the pattern,' labour professor Larry Savage says of Unifor Local 444 in Windsor, Ont. GREG LAYSON Unifor Local 444 President Dave Cassidy, who represents about 4,800 hourly Stellantis workers at the Windsor Assembly Plant, said he “didn’t hear anybody supporting the deal” during a local meeting Oct. 1 that drew 600 members. Unifor, the union that represents 23,500 auto workers in Canada, is staring down a potential revolt by its members when it comes the longstanding tradition of pattern bargaining with the Detroit Three automakers, warns one labour expert. “For years, the union had to contend with the Detroit Three wanting to break the pattern, now it looks like the greatest threat to the pattern is from within the union,” Larry Savage, a labour studies professor at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ont., told Automotive News Canada. Unifor members working at a Stellantis assembly plant in Windsor, Ont., could ultimately try to break the pattern, set by a record-setting contract with Ford Motor Co. of Canada. The agreement, ratified Sept. 24 by only 54 per cent of Ford hourly workers, will net longtime employees nearly 20-per-cent wage gains over three years, including cost-of living allowance fold-ins. As well, members on defined contribution pension plans will switch over to superior defined benefit plans in 2025. Employees also get a record-setting lump-sum signing bonus of $10,000. Unifor Local 444 President Dave Cassidy, who represents about 4,800 hourly Stellantis workers at the Windsor Assembly Plant, said he “didn’t hear anybody supporting the deal” during a local meeting Oct. 1 that drew 600 members. “My membership will not accept what was delivered. And I heard my membership loud and clear,” Cassidy said. “I’m just being honest and laying the groundwork.” MEMBERSHIP HAS ‘FINAL SAY’ Cassidy warned that “the membership ultimately has the final say.” “I work for my membership.” Savage said there’s definitely a movement afoot. “I don’t think you saw [Cassidy] mobilizing people to vote against the Ford deal. But, there’s no question they’re organizing to push to break the pattern,” he said. Unifor Local 444 has the largest number of members eligible to vote on a new Stellantis deal and can easily sway the result, Savage said. By contrast, Brampton Assembly Plant employs about 2,200 hourly workers, according to the automaker’s website. Cassidy and Savage attribute much of the anger on Canadian shop floors to United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain. The fiery labour leader began contract talks in the United States asking for a 46-per-cent wage increase, a four-day work week and more. Fain has since lowered his wage demand to 36 per cent, although the union has been staging strikes across select Detroit Three plants in the U.S. Cassidy said his members in Windsor, a border town connected to Detroit by a tunnel and bridge, “are paying attention to Fain” and expecting similar demands be made by Unifor and met by the Detroit Three in Canada. That, even though Cassidy called the Ford deal one of the best on record. “I know that in my 30 years at Chrysler, the pattern that’s in place today is one of the highest bars that’s ever been set. However, I also know that we haven’t had the big wage increases, because of the situations we’ve been in for the past 15 years.” He said the Great Recession of 2008 and 2009 and COVID-19 have left the industry “in disarray for that long.” Savage said workers view these contract talks as “a golden opportunity to catch up after years of concession bargaining.” “Coming out of the pandemic, workers are more generally fed up and in a mood to fight back,” he said. Savage said workers haven’t wielded this much bargaining power since the turn of the century. THE ‘NEED TO BE CLEAR’ Cassidy is one of 60 Unifor members that will bargain with Stellantis. He’ll sit alongside Unifor President Lana Payne. “I need to be clear with her,” Cassidy said. “I believe we still have a lot of work to do, even after General Motors has completed their round of bargaining.” Payne wasn’t immediately available for comment, but on Oct. 4, she posted a pointed three-minute video message on YouTube, entitled “Why Pattern Bargaining Works.” It could be viewed as targeting Cassidy or General Motors, which Unifor said on Oct. 6 was putting up “some resistance” to the pattern. Resistance to the pattern is nothing new. General Motors in 1996 threatened to break pattern, leading the union to occupy the GM Fabrication Plant in Oshawa, Ont., until the company agreed to the pattern. The late Sergio Marchione, while head of Chrysler and then Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, made it abundantly clear he hated pattern bargaining, alleging smaller automakers couldn’t afford the bigger wage increases set early in negotiations. Payne calls the process “essentially” and “one of the most powerful acts of solidarity we have.” In the video, Payne said without a pattern deal, automakers would sew division, lower wages, lower work standards and pit workers against each other. “We have to fight for this pattern agreement, for the the thousands of members, whose lives will be changed for the better,” Payne says. |
2023 UAW strike update: GM BY SARA POWERS (CBS DETROIT) - UAW President Shawn Fain made an announcement on Friday, sharing the latest bargaining updates in the union's historic strike against the Big Three automakers. Fain announced significant progress in negotiations with General Motors and no additional strikes. Major breakthrough with GM After threatening to strike a major General Motors plant in Arlington, Texas, Fain said the automaker has agreed to place electric vehicle battery plants under a national contract with the UAW. "This week, GM did something that was unthinkable until just today," said Fain. "They agreed to put the future of this industry under our national agreement. This victory is a direct result of the power of our membership. It's your willingness to stand up when called. It's your commitment to winning what you are owed. The companies see it. The world sees it. And today, I was ready to call on one of GM's biggest and most important plants to stand up. And it was that threat that brought GM to the table." Even though the strike at the Arlington plant was avoided, here's what's made at that facility:
GM issued the following statement after Fain's announcement: "Negotiations remain ongoing, and we will continue to work towards finding solutions to address outstanding issues. Our goal remains to reach an agreement that rewards our employees and allows GM to be successful into the future." Negotiation updates Two of the big three automakers committed to a cost of living adjustment. Ford and Stellantis have agreed, and Fain said General Motors is not far behind. In addition, Ford has given up a $1.50 tool allowance, Stellantis is at $1.00 and General Motors has not budged. Fain also said they have made significant progress fighting for pension increases and getting subcommittees addressed. "We're still fighting hard to win retirement security for both our pre-2007 and post-2007 hires," Fain said. The UAW president ended his announcement, saying it's back to the bargaining table to win three record contracts. "We know their pain points, we know their moneymakers, and we know the plants they really don't want to see struck. And they know that we've got more cards left to play," Fain said. "We're not going to let one company fall behind and wait for movement at another table. We're not going to let them sit back and lowball us while others make progress. We expect results at every company. And we've been crystal clear on how you catch a strike and how you avoid one." Stellantis provides update on recent offer to UAW "We continue to have good momentum at the bargaining table and have been working diligently with the UAW over the last week to build on that. We are making progress, but there are gaps that still need to be closed. Since the beginning of these negotiations, our focus hasn't wavered – that is, to reach a balanced agreement as soon as possible that establishes the framework that will allow the Company to be competitive and sustainable in a rapidly changing market and brings our workforce along on the journey. We recently made a serious proposal to the UAW that reinforces our previous commitments: • Provide significant wage increases of 21.4% when compounded through 2027 for all full-time hourly employees Additionally, the Company and union have discussed various solutions to address job security for all of our employees, including those in Belvidere. Beyond our significant economic offer, we also proposed a number of other enhanced benefits. If accepted, this record proposal would bring our represented employees immediate financial benefits, improve work-life balance and secure jobs through the term of the contract. In fact, by the end of this contract, all of our represented employees would see significant increases to their annual salary. Below is what they could expect: While we still have some work to do, I remain optimistic that our discussions are providing a pathway to a tentative agreement. It would be one that fairly rewards our workforce while preserving our ability to compete with non-union manufacturers and protects the future of the Company for our employees, our families and our customers. With more than 8,000 of our colleagues on the picket line, some now in their third week, we are committed to continuing this momentum, so we can get everyone back to work building the vehicles that our customers want and that enable their freedom of movement." |
UAW strike day 21: GM presents Jordyn Grzelewski General Motors Co. has put a new counter offer to the United Auto Workers on the table, the automaker said Thursday, as the union signaled plans to make a new strike announcement on Friday. "We can confirm that we provided a counter offer to the UAW's most recent proposal — our sixth since the start of negotiations," GM spokesperson David Barnas said in a statement. "We believe we have a compelling offer that would reward our team members and allow GM to succeed and thrive into the future. We continue to stand ready and willing to negotiate in good faith 24/7 to reach an agreement." The company did not detail its latest proposal. News of the offer being presented comes as the UAW on Thursday said it planned to have another "stand up announcement" at 2 p.m. Friday. For the past few weeks, UAW President Shawn Fain has been announcing expansions of the union's auto strike strike, in its 21st day Thursday, during Facebook Live events on Fridays. The union's targeted strike of all three Detroit automakers began with walkouts at GM's Wentzville Assembly plant in Missouri, Ford Motor Co.'s Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, and the Stellantis NV Jeep plant in Toledo on Sept. 15. It has since expanded to 38 GM and Stellantis parts distribution centers across the country, and most recently to Ford's Chicago Assembly Plant and GM's Lansing Delta Township plant. The UAW has been using a strike strategy in which leaders call on more workers to join the strike if sufficient progress hasn't been made at the bargaining table, a tactic the union has said enables greater flexibility. GM is the only one of the three automakers that has not been spared in expansions of the strike. Some 25,300 autoworkers out of the roughly 146,000 who are represented by the UAW now are on strike. Negotiations continue The union gave its latest counter offer to GM on Monday. At the time, the company said it was "assessing" the proposal but that "significant gaps" remained. The UAW has not publicly detailed its latest demands or offers. GM also has not disclosed many specifics of its offers, but previously offered a 20% wage increase over the length of the contract, a reduction of half of the time it takes workers to reach the top of the pay scale, raises for temporary workers, and elimination of some wage tiers, among other items. Meanwhile, Ford on Tuesday said it made its seventh and "strongest" offer to the union. The Dearborn automaker's latest offer includes product commitments for every UAW-represented plant in the United States, an increase in starting pay for temporary workers to $21 per hour, conversion upon ratification of all temporary workers with at least three months of continuous service and a wage increase of "more than 20%." It also includes the restoration of cost-of-living allowances, elimination of wage tiers that currently have workers at components plants on different wage scales than assembly plant workers, and reducing by "more than half" the time it takes workers to reach the top of the wage scale. But one key sticking point, according to Ford, is the issue of electric-vehicle battery plants. The company has said the union of taking a "hard line" on the issue and "holding the deal hostage" over it. Stellantis last week was spared from more of its plants joining the strike after it moved on several issues right before new strike targets were announced. The Jeep and Ram maker made progress in talks with the union on areas including cost-of-living adjustments that had been suspended in 2009, the right not to cross a picket line, the right to strike over product commitments and plant closures, and an outsourcing moratorium. The UAW initially sought a non-compounded wage increase of 40% over the length of the contract. It's also seeking stronger job security language, elimination of a tiered wage system, restoration of pensions for all workers, the right to strike over plant closures, and other items. The union has not publicly commented on the latest offers its gotten from the companies, but Fain is expected to update members on where negotiations stand during the live streamed event on Friday. Strike impacts The strike, which is the first time the UAW has conducted work stoppages at all three automakers at the same time, has had ripple effects on production across the companies as well as their suppliers. Most recently, Ford said it was temporarily laying off about 400 workers at its Livonia Transmission and Sterling Axle plants because of production impacts tied to the strike at Chicago Assembly Plant, which builds the Ford Explorer, Lincoln Aviator and police utility vehicles. In all, Ford has temporarily laid off about 1,330 workers due to the strike. GM has laid of 2,175 workers at plants that supply plants that are on strike or that use parts from those plants. The union is providing the equivalent of strike pay, $500, to its members who are laid off and not eligible for unemployment benefits. |
Ford's Q3 sales rise on strong Jordyn Grzelewski, Kalea Hall Ford Motor Co.'s sales rose 7.7% year-over-year in the third quarter, buoyed by higher sales of hybrid vehicles and trucks. The effects of a United Auto Workers strike of all three Detroit automakers that began Sept. 15 have yet to show up in sales results, but that could start to change this month. Some 25,300 autoworkers are on picket lines as the strike stretched into its 20th day Wednesday. Barclays analysts wrote in a note Wednesday that the strike had a "limited impact" on September sales, with the Detroit automakers reporting just a 1% sales decline vs. their average monthly sales year-to-date. Analysts expect greater disruption in the months to come but noted that the companies have a "fair level" of buffer stock on hand: "While certain D3 models/segments have more or less inventory than others — with large pickups/SUVs seeing higher inventory levels — we believe these inventories overall will likely be supportive of near-term sales volumes, at least at the current intensity and pace of the strike." Ford reported Wednesday that it sold 500,504 new vehicles in the United States in the July-September period, up from 464,674 in the same period last year. The gains were reported a day after much of the rest of the auto industry reported higher Q3 sales. Crosstown rival General Motors Co. on Tuesday reported that its Q3 sales were up 21%. The Detroit automaker sold 674,336 vehicles, including more than 20,000 electric vehicles. GM's Chevrolet Traverse and Buick Enclave SUV plant in Delta Township, Wentzville midsize pickup truck and commercial van plant outside St. Louis, and parts distribution centers across the country are on strike. The work stoppage also has brought down Cadillac XT4 and Chevrolet Malibu production at GM's Fairfax plant in Kansas City, Kansas. Meanwhile, Toyota Motor Corp. reported U.S. sales were up 12.2%, Honda Motor Co. Ltd.’s rose 52.7%, Hyundai Motor Co.’s grew by 9%, and Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.'s increased by 40.8%. Sales at Stellantis NV — maker of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram and other vehicles — fell 1% to 380,563 units. Stellantis' Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator plant in Toledo and all of its U.S. parts distribution centers are on strike. Two Ford assembly facilities are on strike: Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, which builds the Bronco and Ranger, and Chicago Assembly Plant, which builds the Ford Explorer and Lincoln Aviator. Analysts at Cox Automotive said in a note Wednesday that new-vehicles sales in Q3 in the United States were "solid, spurred on by vastly improved inventories, higher fleet sales and consumers still in market despite elevated prices and high auto loan rates." Initial estimates indicate that sales were "slightly above" Cox's forecast of a 15% increase. GM, Toyota, Hyundai and Nissan posted "particularly strong" results." At the start of September, new-vehicle inventory was 68% higher than in 2022, according to Cox. Incentives have been up, too. Meanwhile, Ford sold 20,962 electric vehicles in the quarter, up 14.8%. Hybrid sales of 34,861 vehicles were up 41.4%, led by F-150 and Maverick hybrid sales. Ford reported that sales of the F-150 hybrid were up 46.9%, and that the hybrid model now makes up 56.5% of all Mavericks sold. Internal combustion engine vehicle sales of 444,681 were up 5.4%. Year to date, Ford's sales are up 9.2% from the first nine months of 2022. Truck sales rose 15.3% in the quarter to 275,554 units while SUV sales were essentially flat at about 215,000 units. “We saw strong balanced sales growth providing choice to our customers in the third quarter, with growthcoming from our gas engine, electric, hybrid and commercial van lineup,” Andrew Frick, Ford's vice president ofsales, distribution and trucks, said in a statement. “Ford’s truck lineup remains the industry’s top seller. The Maverick and Bronco Sport remain red hot after Ford boosted manufacturing capacity earlier this year. The all-new seventh generation Mustang is off to a jack-rabbit start in its first full month, up 90 percent in Septemberover last year.” Rhett Ricart, owner of Ricart Automotive Group in Columbus, Ohio, which includes Chevrolet and Ford dealerships, said that in a recent meeting with other dealers, they’re wasn’t much concern about the strike affecting inventory levels and sales, but more the “parts availability to keep customers rolling down the road.” Dealership shops and outside service centers have already been struggling to get parts during the pandemic. Automakers battled supply shortages on semiconductors chips and other supplies for months. “This is just gonna exacerbate it,” Ricart said. Ricart had one of the best September sales months on record at his dealerships because pent-up demand is still there, he said, even with high prices and interest rates. Ricart thinks the constant strike news has consumers heading to get new vehicles now before lower supply takes hold as a result of the strike and affects pricing. “The intuition is that people hear about this strike and they were thinking about buying a car here in the next two, three, four months, they're figuring if this strike keeps going on, these cars are gonna get more expensive because the supply is going to be down,” he said. “I think they're thinking, ‘I buy one now before that strike depletes the inventories.’” Sales of Ford brand SUVs were up across nearly every nameplate, including a 55.1% gain for Bronco Sport and 42.5% increase for the electric Mustang Mach-E. The outliers were the Expedition and the Explorer; the Explorer recently was under a stop-sale over an issue with the vehicle's rearview camera system and the facility where it's built now is on strike. In the truck segment, sales of Ford's flagship F-Series rose 13.4% in the third quarter to 190,477 units, retaining its status as the best-selling truck in the country. Sales were up across Maverick, E-Series, Transit and heavy trucks. They were down across the electric F-150 Lightning, Ranger and Transit Connect nameplates. Mustang sales fell 4.9%. The new 2024 model of the Mustang had its first full month of sales in September. Ford reported it's turning on dealer lots in just six days. Ford's luxury Lincoln brand reported a 1.8% sales gain in the quarter. |
Ford makes seventh contract Detroit Free Press Ford Motor Co. made an offer to the UAW on Monday in an effort to reach a tentative agreement on a new master labor contract, the automaker announced Tuesday evening. The agreement, which would run through April 30, 2028, is the seventh and strongest offer Ford has made on the key economic issues since Aug. 29, Ford said in a news release. "Ford has received two comprehensive counteroffers from the UAW, the last on Sept. 25. Ford’s latest offer provides our 57,000 UAW-represented employees with a record contract and a strong future," Ford said. Ford said its offer includes "unprecedented improvements in wages (putting employees among the top 25% of all U.S. jobs, hourly and salaried) and benefits, product commitments for every UAW factory and job security." At the same time, it preserves Ford’s ability to invest and grow, the Dearborn automaker said. “There’s no doubt our UAW workforce put us on their shoulders during the pandemic, and these same workers and their families were hit hard by inflation. We want to make sure our workers come out of these negotiations with two things — a record contract and a strong future,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a news release. “We’ve put an offer on the table that will be costly for the company, especially given our large American footprint and UAW workforce, but one that we believe still allows Ford to invest in the future.” Ford said the union has taken a hard line on unionizing future battery plants. A future that will include battery plants "While Ford remains open to the possibility of working with the UAW on future battery plants in the United States, these are multibillion-dollar investments and must operate at competitive and sustainable levels," the news release said. "Three of the four battery plants under construction are part of the BlueOval SK joint venture between Ford and SK On. The workforce for these operations has not been hired." Future employees at the battery operations may choose to be represented by the UAW and enter into the collective bargaining process, Ford reiterated. "As Ford has made clear, none of our employees, including powertrain employees, will lose their jobs due to our battery plants during this contract period," Ford said in its news release. "In fact, for the foreseeable future, we will have to hire more workers as some workers retire, in order to keep up with demand for our ICE (internal combustion engine) products." Here are the details Here are the highlights, according to a release by Ford at 5:32 p.m. Tuesday:
UAW: No comment The UAW declined to immediately comment on the Ford announcement. Some 25,000 UAW workers have been strategically deployed to strike Ford Motor Co., General Motors and Stellantis since mid-September. Michigan Assembly, which builds the Ford Bronco SUV and Ranger truck, had strike lines set up on Sept. 15. Then parts distribution sites for GM and Stellantis (which owns Jeep, Ram, Chrysler and Dodge) joined the campaign on Sept. 22, disrupting the flow of parts to car dealers and repair shops. On Friday, the UAW hit Ford with a strike on the Chicago Assembly Plant that builds the Ford Explorer and Lincoln Aviator. Farley held a news media briefing to say the Dearborn automaker would have made a deal already but the UAW was holding the company hostage with battery plant demands. Hours later, General Motors CEO Mary Barra lashed out at the UAW for its "theatrics." The company confirmed Monday it had received a counterproposal from the UAW. |
UAW strike day 17: Negotiations Kalea Hall Negotiations between the United Auto Workers and Detroit Three automakers continued Sunday — day 17 of an unprecedented strike by the union against Ford Motor Co., Stellantis NV and General Motors Co. The strike started Sept. 15 with the UAW unleashing a targeted walkout strategy starting with plant work stoppages at Ford's Michigan Assembly in Wayne, Stellantis' Toledo Assembly Complex and GM's Wentzville Assembly in Missouri. The strike has been expanded twice to include all Stellantis and GM parts distribution centers and on Friday added two SUV plants: GM's Lansing Delta Township plant and Ford's Chicago Assembly — bringing the number of autoworkers on strike to 25,300 out of 146,000 UAW members at the companies. Stellantis' facilities were spared the latest expansion since the Jeep and Ram maker made progress in talks with the union on areas including cost-of-living adjustments that had been suspended in 2009, the right not to cross a picket line, the right to strike over product commitments and plant closures, and an outsourcing moratorium. "I actually took it as a big sigh of relief that Stellantis made significant movement," said Art Wheaton, an automotive industry specialist at Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School. "To me, that was great news. Primarily because I was most concerned about Stellantis going in. It seems to me that they are going along closer to the pattern and they may actually stick with pattern bargaining." Ford had previously been spared in the union's first move to expand the strike targets. The Dearborn automaker had made progress the week leading up to Sept. 22 in talks with the Dearborn automaker on cost of living adjustments, wage disparities at feeder plants and job security protections. Despite some progress on certain items, Ford slammed the union on Friday after the strike expansion that added the Chicago Assembly plant where the Ford Explorer and Lincoln Aviator are built. Ford CEO Jim Farley accused the union of "holding the deal hostage" over the automaker's four planned electric-vehicle battery plants in the United States. Late Friday, GM CEO Mary Barra issued a scathing statement against the union claiming it has "no real intent to get to an agreement." The automakers and union have remained far apart on the union's demands to provide pensions for all employees, retiree health care, a restored jobs bank and wage increases of 36% over four years. The companies have offered wage hikes of about 20% while expressing concern that granting all of the union priorities would further widen the gap between their employee costs and those of non-union competitors such as Tesla Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Detroit Three automaker costs are in the mid-$60 range while foreign automakers' labor costs are in the mid-$50 range and Tesla Inc.'s are in the high-$40 range. With Stellantis and Ford making moves on cost-of-living increases, Wheaton thinks GM could be next. "Maybe GM will follow suit ... especially with all of the firepower that's all on the UAW side at the moment," he said. "I don't hear a whole lot of criticism from the public." How it feels on the picket line Workers who build the Bronco and Ranger at Ford's Michigan Assembly are heading into their third week on strike. "I would like to get back to work but only with the proper contract," said Patrick Smalley, who's been with Ford for 35 years. Smalley, 56, of Westland is ready to stay out for "however long it takes." Feelings about still being on strike are mixed on the picket line, Smalley said. "Some people had prepared for it and others may not have and it's getting to the point where, 'OK, I would love to go back to work,' some people are saying, but if we just have to do it, we have to do it," he said. Fellow Michigan Assembly worker Kim McCartha, who's been at Ford since 2012, is ready for the two sides to come to an agreement. "But I know that we do want a good deal, a fair deal," the 58-year-old from Redford said, noting she wants to see wage increases, restoration of cost-of-living allowances and the tiered-wage system addressed in the next contract. Before the strike, McCartha started watching her spending. Now, with strike pay at $500 a week, she's still "being real cautious and just waiting, not going on trips or not doing anything extra," she said. Being on strike, "it's a little bit different for me than being on the line," she said. "But hey, I'm ready to grind it out as long as we have to." Auto sales out this week The Detroit Three report their third-quarter sales this week, but experts don't expect to see the strike affecting them just yet. Analysts at Edmunds.com Inc., a vehicle information website, are forecasting sales of 3.9 million new cars and trucks in the United States for the third quarter of 2023, marking a 16% year-over-year increase. Before the strike, Edmunds' data showed Detroit Three vehicles sat on dealer lots longer than the industry average. In a statement sent last week, Edmunds Director of Insights Ivan Drury said: “Availability is currently strong for American-branded trucks and SUVs, but shoppers contemplating a new-vehicle purchase from any of the Detroit brands may consider expediting their search process given the strike’s unpredictable impact on supply." |
US expands probe into Ford engine Associated Press Detroit – U.S. auto safety investigators have expanded a probe into Ford Motor Co. engine failures to include nearly 709,000 vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also said in documents posted Monday on its website that it upgraded the investigation to an engineering analysis, a step closer to a recall. The investigation now covers Ford's F-150 pickup truck, as well as Explorer, Bronco and Edge SUVs and Lincoln Nautilus and Aviator SUVs. All are from the 2021 and 2022 model years and are equipped with 2.7-liter or 3.0-liter V6 turbocharged engines. The agency says that under normal driving conditions the engines can lose power due to catastrophic engine failure related to allegedly faulty valves. The agency opened its initial investigation in May of last year after getting three letters from owners. Initially the probe was looking at failure of the 2.7-liter engine on Broncos. Since then, Ford reported 861 customer complaints, warranty claims and engine replacements including the other models. No crashes or injuries were reported. The company told the agency in documents that defective intake valves generally fail early in a vehicle's life, and most of the failures have already happened. The company told NHTSA said it made a valve design change in October of 2021. Ford said in a statement Monday that it’s working with NHTSA to support the investigation. The agency says it will evaluate how often the problem happens and review the effectiveness of Ford's manufacturing improvements designed to address the problem. |
Ford CEO says UAW holding By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ford Motor Chief Executive Jim Farley on Friday accused the United Auto Workers union of holding up a new U.S. labor agreement in a bid to force the automaker to pay workers at new battery plants the same top wages as workers at assembly plants. Farley also disclosed the automaker is awaiting "final language" from the U.S. Treasury on whether batteries made at a planned Michigan plant using Chinese technology will qualify for tax credits. "The UAW is holding the deal hostage over battery plants," Farley said, and claimed a "bad deal" could threaten financial viability of some U.S. vehicle production. . UAW President Shawn Fain said Farley was not telling the truth about the negotiations and said the sides were far apart on core economic proposals including "job security in this EV transition, which Farley himself says is going to cut 40% of our members’ jobs." On Monday, Ford said it had paused work on its $3.5 billion Marshall, Michigan battery plant that will use technology licensed from Chinese battery company CATL, citing concerns about its ability to operate competitively. In 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) barring $7,500 in future consumer EV tax credits if any battery components are manufactured or assembled by a "foreign entity of concern." Ford is awaiting guidance to determine if batteries produced by the Marshall plant would meet the requirements. "We can make Marshall a lot bigger or a lot smaller," Farley said. On Sept. 8, Ford wrote Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm warning that an unfavorable interpretation of the foreign entity provision would lead the automaker to make "fewer batteries in Michigan, shrinking that project and affecting the volume at EV assembly plants outside of Michigan. This will mean fewer U.S. jobs." This week, the chairs of three U.S. House committees demanded Ford turn over documents tied to the CATL partnership. Republican lawmakers have been probing Ford's battery plant plan for months over concerns it could send U.S. tax subsidies to China and leave Ford dependent on Chinese technology. |
UAW makes new counter By David Shepardson and Joseph White (Reuters) - The United Auto Workers made a new counter-proposal to Chrysler-parent Stellantis on Thursday, just one day before the union is set to strike additional Detroit Three automotive facilities without serious progress in ongoing labor negotiations. A union official confirmed the new proposal as talks remain active with Stellantis, General Motors and Ford Motor in the strike's fourteenth day. The UAW and the Detroit Three have been far apart on key issues. As of Thursday, the UAW's position is that workers should get 40% pay increases, cost of living adjustments pegged to inflation, job or pay guarantees, an end to lower wages for lower seniority workers and defined benefit pensions. The automakers are offering 20% wage increases, but have proposed less generous cost of living and retirement benefits. The automakers also have not agreed to the UAW demand that new hires get top pay after 90 days on the job. UAW President Shawn Fain plans to disclose the union's next steps Friday at 10 a.m. ET (1400 GMT) in an online address. The flurry of activity on Thursday comes after a week in which there appeared to be little movement in the contract talks. Fain hosted U.S. President Joe Biden's historic visit to a union picket line on Tuesday. Fain met Wednesday with GM negotiators. Stellantis and GM did not immediately comment. Stellantis earlier on Thursday criticized the UAW's rhetoric. "The deliberate use of inflammatory and violent rhetoric is dangerous and needs to stop. The companies are not 'the enemy' and we are not at 'war,'" Stellantis said, adding it has "put a record offer on the table and are working hard to reach an agreement as quickly as possible." Last week, the UAW expanded strikes that initially began with three assembly plants - one at each Detroit automaker - to 38 GM and Stellantis parts distribution centers but did not add any Ford facilities citing progress. Stellantis last week indefinitely laid off more than 350 workers in Ohio and Indiana because of the strike impact. Ford has furloughed 600 workers at a Michigan plant, and GM has furloughed 2,000 workers and halted production at a Kansas plant because of strike-related impacts. |
Donald Trump: UAW negotiations Craig Mauger Clinton Township — Republican Donald Trump railed against electric vehicles during a campaign stop in suburban Detroit Wednesday night, saying they're too expensive, aren't capable of traveling far enough and would spur job losses for Americans. Trump, a former president who's seeking to challenge current Democratic President Joe Biden next year, made the comments during a speech at Drake Enterprises, a parts supplier in Clinton Township. Amid a historic strike by the United Auto Workers against Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, Trump said: "Your current negotiations don’t mean as much as you think." Trump argued that regardless of the outcome of the strike, the bigger threat to employees was the shift to electric cars and trucks, which he described as a "hit job" on Michigan and Detroit. "You can be loyal to American labor or you can be loyal to the environmental lunatics," Trump said at one point. "But you can’t really be loyal to both. It’s one or the other." Biden and other Democrats, including Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, have promoted the transition to electric vehicles and sought to compete with other countries to produce them. Whitmer has said switching to electric vehicles will save families money over the lifetime of the vehicles, support tens of thousands of well-paying auto jobs in Michigan and help "safeguard clean air and water for future generations." Trump's speech Wednesday night was about an hour long. He described a future "fueled by American energy" and "built by highly skilled American hands and high-wage American labor.” But his address was short on specifics for how he would accomplish the goals. Trump's visit came a day after Biden appeared on a picket line in Wayne County and told members of the United Auto Workers union they deserved a "significant raise." On Wednesday, Trump said he supported the push for fair wages but added that workers should be concerned about the promotion of electric vehicles. Kevin Munoz, spokesman for Biden's reelection campaign, described the speech as "incoherent" and "a pathetic, recycled attempt to feign support for working Americans." "Americans have seen him try this before, and they aren’t buying it," Munoz said. "They know who Donald Trump really is: a billionaire charlatan running on empty words, broken promises and lost jobs." During his remarks, Trump heaped blame on Biden and encouraged the crowd to get the UAW to endorse him. He told workers to reach out to Shawn Fain, president of the UAW, and tell him if the union backs Trump, Fain could take a vacation and they would better off than they ever were. Trump later characterized the transition from gas engines to electric vehicles as "a transition to hell," a phrase he has repeated on the campaign trail this year. "The auto industry is being assassinated," Trump said. "If you want to buy an electric car, that's absolutely fine. I'm all for it. But we should not be forcing consumers to buy electric vehicles they don't want to buy." Nathan Stemple, president of Drake Enterprises, said it was "unbelievable" Drake had a chance to host the former president on Wednesday. Among the products of Drake Enterprises are gear shift levers and transmission components for heavy trucks with gas-powered engines, according to the company's website. While Trump criticized Biden's push to support electric vehicles, Stemple said the transition is not his top cause of worry currently. The toughest obstacle for his company is finding the right workers, Stemple said ahead of Trump's speech. "It would definitely affect us if it changed like a light switch," Stemple said of moving to electric vehicles. "I don’t see that happening.” About 400 to 500 Trump supporters were inside a Drake Enterprises facility for the speech. Drake Enterprises employs about 150 people, and the UAW doesn't represent its workforce. It wasn't clear how many auto workers were in the crowd for the speech, which was targeted at them. One individual in the crowd who held a sign that said "union members for Trump," acknowledged that she wasn't a union member when approached by a Detroit News reporter after the event. Another person with a sign that read "auto workers for Trump" said he wasn't an auto worker when asked for an interview. Both people didn't provide their names. One of the attendees for Trump's speech, Doug King, a 55-year-old auto worker from Clawson, said ultimately, consumers, not the government, should decide which vehicles to purchase. King said he supported Trump's efforts to pressure auto manufacturers to keep jobs in the United States during his term in the White House. “The four years under Trump were the best years that we had in the auto industry," contended King, who works for Stellantis. But Democrats blasted Trump's record on manufacturing. U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Birmingham, said while Trump had claimed to support to support union workers, he didn't even go to a union facility. Biden's reelection team announced Wednesday morning, about 14 hours before Trump's speech at 8 p.m. in Macomb County, that it was launching its first Michigan-focused TV ad of the 2024 race. Entitled "Delivers," the commercial accuses Trump of passing tax breaks for "rich friends" while automakers shuttered plants and Michigan lost manufacturing jobs. "Manufacturing is coming back to Michigan because Joe Biden doesn't just talk, he delivers," says the new ad, which will air in the Detroit, Grand Rapids and Lansing markets. While Trump was president from 2017 to 2021, Ford's engine plant in Romeo shuttered and GM shuttered a transmission plant in Warren, a powertrain plant in Baltimore and closed its Lordstown, Ohio assembly plant. Stellantis (formerly Fiat Chrysler Automobiles) opened a new Jeep plant on Detroit's east side, while idling its Mount Elliott Tool & Die plant. While Biden has been president, Stellantis idled its one part of its Trenton engine plant last year and its Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois in February. Meanwhile, the Democratic National Committee is rolling out billboards in Metro Detroit that criticize Trump's approach to autos. One says "thousands" of auto workers were laid off while Trump was president and includes the words "promises broken." Going electric The early Democratic barrage, about 13 months before the November 2024 election, was likely meant to preempt Trump's address on Wednesday night. The former president's stop happened 13 days into the United Auto Workers strike against GM, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV, a day after Biden visited the picket line in Michigan and on the night of the second Republican presidential primary debate, in which Trump didn't participate. A past report from the United Auto Workers acknowledged the shift to electric vehicles means replacing key powertrain components, such as engines, with mechanically simpler lithium-ion batteries and electric motors. "Whereas traditional powertrains have often been made by automakers themselves and created quality union jobs, EV batteries are mostly made by suppliers in other countries, with China in the lead," the report said. Biden's administration has attempted to promote the use of electric vehicles, but it's also invested in building the cars and trucks in the U.S. In August, Biden signed a $280 billion bipartisan bill to boost domestic high-tech manufacturing in a bid to help the country compete with China. So far, the number of jobs in vehicle and parts manufacturing in Michigan has held essentially steady during Biden's term in the White House, increasing by 2% to about 169,000 jobs in August, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. During Trump's four-year term, the number of jobs in vehicle and parts manufacturing in Michigan fell by 5% to about 166,000, according to the bureau's tracking. But the industry was still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2021 when Trump left office. Kristina Karamo, chairwoman of the Michigan Republican Party, defended the former president Wednesday, saying now, both parents in a family have to work and people are still struggling to afford to get by. There's been a shift within the GOP in favor of protecting workers and opposing "crony capitalism," Karamo said. Asked if she would ever show up on a UAW picket line, Karamo replied, "I don’t know. … I don’t know. What I don’t like is that the UAW continues to back candidates who harm the economy.” 'The way it was' Trump has often touted his administration's efforts to rework trade deals in ways that he said would benefit manufacturing in the U.S. For instance, during Trump's tenure, automakers and groups that lobby for the industry hailed the passage of the U.S.-Canada-Mexico Agreement, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement of 1994 that Trump railed against in his successful 2016 campaign for the White House. Retired auto worker Brian Pannebecker of Harrison Township helped recruit people to attend Trump's event on Wednesday. Pannebecker said he expected about 300 auto workers to show up. And he touted Trump's efforts to renegotiate trade deals. Pannebecker said it was rare for a candidate for president to get to hold an event focused on workers inside a company's facility in Michigan, like Trump did Wednesday. "The auto plants typically don’t let a candidate campaign in their plants," Pannebecker said. Rachel Case, who said she worked at a truck plant in Flint, drove to Macomb County to try to get into Trump's speech. Case said she wants to see prices for items, like milk, go back to where they were before Biden's term. “I would hope that he could bring it back to the way it was,” Case said of Trump. But, on Tuesday, Shawn Fain, president of the United Auto Workers, criticized Trump's past stances on auto jobs in the U.S. "I find it odd he’s gonna go to a non-union business to talk to union workers," Fain added of Trump's visit. "I don’t think he gets it." |
UAW strike day 12: Talks continue Kalea Hall Negotiations continued Tuesday between the United Auto Workers and the Detroit Three automakers while President Joe Biden visited a picket line Tuesday with UAW President Shawn Fain. Biden spoke with union members at General Motors Co.'s Willow Run Redistribution Center in Van Buren Township on Tuesday — the 12th day of the union's strike against GM, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. Using a targeted plant strike strategy, the UAW called on workers to walk out Sept. 15 at GM's Wentzville, Missouri, midsize truck plant, Ford's Bronco and Ranger plant in Wayne and Stellantis' Jeep Gladiator and Wrangler plant in Toledo. On Friday, the UAW expanded the strike against GM and Stellantis, adding all of their parts distributions centers. Ford was spared since the Dearborn automaker and the union have made progress in talks. With the addition of the parts centers, about 18,300 union members are on strike. Biden's visit Tuesday marked the first time in at least a century that a sitting president has visited a labor union's picket line, according to the White House. Former President Donald Trump is visiting Michigan Wednesday. The leading Republican candidate for the 2024 election is skipping the second GOP presidential debate on Wednesday evening and instead hosting a rally in Clinton Township with "current and former union members." He'll deliver remarks at automotive supplier Drake Enterprises, whose members are not represented by the UAW. The union is striking the Detroit Three to fight for higher wages, an end to tiered-wage systems and temporary employee usage, and other demands. The automakers have offered up double-digit wage increases and cutting the time it takes to get to the top wage rate in half, among other items. Ford's talks with the UAW have progressed since the Dearborn automaker offered to restore of the cost-of-living adjustment that was suspended in 2009; and, for the first time, the right to strike over plant closures. Fain told reporters that the union is "moving with all three companies still. It’s slower, but it’s bargaining — some days you feel like you make two steps forward, the next day you take a step back. Things are moving, but we just have to see. We analyze every day.” The automakers are concerned about the UAW's demands pushing their labor costs, which already are higher than their foreign and domestic non-union competitors, up even more. On Tuesday, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted about the striking UAW-represented autoworkers on the X social media platform, formerly known as Twitter, that he also owns: "They want a 40% pay raise *and* a 32 hour workweek. Sure way to drive GM, Ford and Chrysler bankrupt in the fast lane." When asked if the union would expand the strike to other plants, Fain said: “We just have to reflect where we are every day. We basically take an assessment as we have talks and see where we are. We could take action tonight; we can wait until the end of the week. That’s the beauty of the situation we’re in right now; we have a lot of options and we’ll use those options when we feel like we need to.” The strike at GM's Wentzville plant led the automaker to halt production at its Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas where the Chevrolet Malibu and Cadillac XT4 are built. The Detroit automaker also had to lay off 140 employees at its Toledo Propulsion plant since the facility manufactures parts for the rear-wheel drive, eight-speed transmissions installed in trucks built at Wentzville. Toledo has about 1,382 represented employees and most will continue to work since they make parts for other products. The strike has also hit some suppliers. Eagle Industries Inc., in a notice to the state, said it could temporarily lay off 171 employees in production and administration out of 230 workers at a plant in Wixom. Even with a strike and unknowns of what's to come between the Detroit Three and the UAW, the U.S. auto industry’s sales through the end of September showed a continued "robust" recovery, according to a Cox Automotive forecast released Tuesday. Despite rising interest rates on new vehicle loans and the strike, experts at Cox said sales in September should reach nearly 1.3 million — an increase of more than 13% from 2022. Overall, sales in the third quarter should come in at more than 3.9 million for an increase of more than 15% year-over-year. After strong momentum in the third quarter, Cox Automotive is increasing its full-year new-vehicle sales forecast to between 15.3 million and 15.4 million units, up from the forecast of 15 million made at the end of the first half of the year. The Detroit Three and other automakers will report sales for July through September next week. Stellantis and GM will both report on Oct. 3. Ford will report on Oct. 4. Stellantis went into the strike with higher inventory levels on Dodge, Chrysler, Ram and Jeep models, according to Cox. Ford also had high levels for both of its brands: Ford and Lincoln. Meanwhile, GM's inventory levels on Chevrolet and Cadillac brands were tight. GMC and Buick had higher levels. Automakers have been working to rebuild new-vehicle inventories but avoid a glut after pandemic-induced parts supply issues limited production for months at a time. The low supply, coupled with continued strong demand, caused prices to increase. Monthly payments on new vehicles were up 24% from August 2019 to August 2023, according to Cox. A strike could put more upward pressure on pricing for some products. "My concern is that if the strike lasts beyond Thanksgiving, the industry at that point is very likely to see a setback ... and we're going to see it first (affect) the brands and the models with the tightest supply," Cox Automotive Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke said on a call with reporters Tuesday. "So far, the impact has been negligible. However, we are likely to start seeing the first signs of that impact, we think, next month in October, and again, it's going to be in those vehicles that are in the tightest supply." Dealers on Tuesday were positive about the inventory they have on the ground and in transit to their dealerships. In the pandemic, dealers had to learn how to function with very little inventory and preselling new vehicles before they arrived. They have been starting to see recovery this year. "We have over 200 units on the ground and another 250 in transit, so there's no effect whatsoever," said Walt Tutak, general manager of Matthews-Hargreaves Chevrolet in Royal Oak. "We've got the best inventory that we've had in a long, long time. The sad part is things are starting to get caught up, and even in service for parts ... and then this might throw a little bit of a wrench into it." Across the country in Seattle, Ram, Chrysler and Dodge dealer Jim Walen has ample supply to get through the next month or two. There's more concern about the future availability of parts with Stellantis' parts distribution plants down in the strike. "Nothing has happened yet," Walen said. "Our day supply is fine ... and I don't think there's negative repercussions with the buying public." Consumers are more concerned about high interest rates and a potential government shutdown than if Stellantis, Ford and GM "can get along with the UAW," Walen said. "Outside the bubble, it's not as big a deal, but it will be if it continues." |
Unifor chooses next company for Breana Noble Kalea Hall The Canadian autoworkers union Unifor is pivoting to negotiate with General Motors Co. after its members ratified a historic contract with Ford Motor Co. on Sunday. Unifor chose GM over Stellantis NV, maker of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram vehicles, for its next set of contract talks, which are set to resume Tuesday. Unifor President Lana Payne in a video message said the union currently has more leverage over the Detroit automaker than it does its crosstown rival to bring the pattern set at Ford to its other autoworker members. “We’ve got an incredibly strong pattern agreement at Ford that will serve us well over the coming years," she said. "Our job now is to negotiate that pattern in the form of a renewal collective agreement with General Motors and Stellantis." In a statement sent by GM spokesperson Jennifer Wright, the automaker said it welcomes the resumption of negotiations to reach a tentative agreement: "We look forward to working with our Unifor partners to build a competitive future that also recognizes our employees’ contributions to our shared success.” Unifor’s negotiations with GM cover approximately 4,300 workers at the St. Catharines Powertrain Plant building engines for the Chevrolet Equinox and Corvette, Oshawa Assembly Complex making light- and heavy-duty Chevrolet Silverado pickup trucks and parts for other vehicles, and the Woodstock Parts Distribution Centre in Ontario. “Just as we had with Ford Motor Company, we hold a lot of negotiating leverage with GM," Payne said. "Their Oshawa facility is working around-the-clock producing very lucrative pick-up trucks. The St. Catharines engine and transmission facility, like Ford’s powertrain operations, is a lynchpin for GM’s North American operations. Our Woodstock distribution centre is also a key element of the company’s parts network. I don’t expect this to be an easy round of talks, and I want to make sure our union is best positioned to move this pattern forward for the benefit of all members, active and retired." Larry Savage, a labor studies professor at Brock University in Ontario, said in an email that GM's operations are highly integrated: "Targeting GM makes sense insofar as shutting down plants in Oshawa and St. Catharines and the GM distribution centre in Woodstock would give Unifor maximum leverage in bargaining." In contrast, Payne said Stellantis' Windsor Assembly Plant, where it builds the Chrysler Pacifica minivans, is slated for retooling as a part of a $2.8 billion investment in the plant and the Brampton Assembly Plant outside Toronto, which builds the Dodge muscle cars and Chrysler 300 sedan that are going out of production at the end of the year. Downtime at Windsor limits Unifor's leverage, Payne said, and the union is seeking more specifics on the company's product and investment plan for Brampton. "I believe we need more clarity on this before our talks commence," she said. Unifor's three-year deal with Ford acknowledges workers' greatest priorities, the union said Saturday, and includes the single largest negotiated general wage increase in the history of Unifor, formerly the Canadian Auto Workers. Workers approved the agreement with a 54% majority. "That's a sign of a successful negotiation," Art Wheaton, an automotive industry specialist at Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School, said about the slim margin. "There was no fat left on the table. Both sides did their job." That also is helpful for GM to know the Ford offer is the minimum they can expect Unifor's rank-and-file to support, he added, which likely will help it to reach a tentative agreement with the United Auto Workers in the United States, as well. The UAW is on strike at GM's Wentzville midsize pickup truck and full-size commercial van plant outside St. Louis as well as its parts distribution centers. "Now that Ford has a deal, GM can follow the pattern in Canada with Unifor," Wheaton said. "Once they find a solution in Canada, that can help GM find a solution in the U.S." The approval of the deal at Ford means 5,600 employees, split between three plants in Ontario — Oakville Assembly, Essex Engine and Windsor Engine — once again have a contract. Unlike the UAW, Unifor opted to negotiate only with one company at a time. The UAW went on strike Sept. 15 at select facilities of Ford, GM and Stellantis. Unifor's contract with Ford includes wage increases of 10% the first year, 2% the second year and 3% the year after, as well as cost-of-living adjustments. It also reduces the amount of time an in-progression employee needs to reach the top pay scale from eight years to four. For those workers who haven't reached top scale, it raises the percentage those workers get in the first three years. Over the life of the agreement, senior employees will see their hourly rate rise from $37.33 Canadian to $44.52, an increase of 19.2%. Kathleen O'Keefe, a Unifor spokesperson, said the union projects inflation of 2.5% over the next three years, translating to an additional $1.61 in COLA added to top-scale members' wages, bringing their projected hourly rate to $46.13. The Canadian dollar is equivalent to 74 cents in U.S. currency. Permanent workers will get a ratification bonus of $10,000 Canadian, while temporary ones will get a $4,000 Canadian bonus. The agreement also includes "significant increases" to retirement programs, Ford said. Defined benefit contributions likely will be a sticking point at GM, Wheaton said, but with Ford being its main direct competitor, it likely won't want to be left behind either. "Ford is the good. GM is the bad. Stellantis is the ugly," he said. "They chose Ford first, got an agreement, and it helped set the pattern. General Motors will be difficult. I don’t think it will be a quick negotiation, but I think it's possible. Stellantis is a nightmare, though I think they want a deal more so in Canada than they do the U.S. It's harder for GM to pull out of the U.S. than Stellantis. |
PRESIDENT OF UNIFOR HeartRadio.ca John D'Agnolo, president of Unifor Local 200 in Windsor and chair of Unifor's Ford Master Bargaining Committee. Unifor for has announced the Ford Motor Company will be the target company in pattern bargaining with the Detroit 3 automakers. Aug. 29, 2023 (Photo: Rusty Thomson) The President of Unifor Local 200 in Windsor is 'elated' with the tentative agreement between Unifor and Ford Motor Company. On Tuesday evening it was announced by Unifor that a tentative agreement had been reached, covering more than 5,600 members at the Canadian Ford facilities. John D'Agnolo, who also is the Chair of the Ford Master Bargaining Committee, says that while it was an exhausting 48 hours of bargaining, but it was important to push forward to support the members. The contract between Unifor and Ford expired Monday at 11:59 p.m., however just minutes before the strike deadline Ford made a "significant offer" to the union. Unifor stated that the offer was significant enough to allow for a 24-hour extension. On August 29, Unifor selected Ford Motor Company as the target company, focusing on negotiations with Ford to set the pattern agreement for the union's 18,000 members. D'Agnolo says if the deal is ratified, it will move onto Stellantis and General Motors. "Then the members will obviously see it through the highlight packages, and then the Stellantis leadership or the GM [General Motors] leadership, whoever is next, will be coming to Toronto to start their bargaining." He says his message to workers is to wait and see. "You're going to hear a lot of rumours at times, you're going to hear things that aren't factual. So until you have that paper in front of you, until you hear it come out of our leadership's mouths, wait and see, because it's very important that you know all of the information when it comes to bargaining." He says he's elated with the tentative agreement. "We want to make sure we covered absolutely everybody, from the new hires to the retirees, to the retired workers, to the people that have the opportunity to retire in the near future. So, we wanted to make sure that everybody in this agreement was affected and I believe we did so." D'Agnolo says that a ratification vote at all Ford units will be taking place at their respective locations on Saturday, September 23. He says times will be shared in the coming days. The new tentative agreement covers members of Unifor Locals 707, 200, 584, 1087, 240 and 1324 at Ford's Oakville Assembly Plant, Annex and Essex Engine Plants in Windsor, Ontario in addition to Parts Distribution Centres in Bramalea, Paris and Casselman in Ontario and Leduc, Alberta. Unifor represents 978 workers at the Annex Engine Plant which produces the 6.8-litre and 7.3-litre engines for use in the F-Series of pick-up trucks. There are 756 workers at the Essex Engine Plant which produces the 5.0L V8 engine. |
Ford, Unifor reach tentative agreement, averting Breana NobleKalea The Detroit News Unifor, the autoworkers' union in Canada, and Ford Motor Co. said Tuesday night they had struck a tentative agreement, averting a strike for the Dearborn automaker in a second North American country. Details on the deal won't be presented until after they are shared with Unifor members at ratification meetings being held "in the near future," according to a news release. The parties early Tuesday morning had agreed to extend the talks 24 hours after the original deadline of 11:59 p.m. Monday, with Unifor instructing its members to remain at work unless they received alternate instructions from the union. “We believe that this tentative agreement, endorsed by the entire master bargaining committee, addresses all of the items raised by members in preparation for this round of collective bargaining,” Unifor National President Lana Payne said in a statement. “We believe that this agreement will solidify the foundations on which we will continue to bargain gains for generations of autoworkers in Canada.” Ford of Canada said in a statement sent by spokesperson Said Deep: "Ford of Canada and Unifor have reached a tentative agreement on a three-year national labour contract covering more than 5,000 unionized employees in Canada." "The agreement is subject to ratification by Ford-Unifor members," the statement said. "To respect the ratification process, Ford of Canada will not discuss the specifics of the tentative agreement." Ford on Monday had presented a "substantive" offer "minutes before the deadline," according to a Unifor statement sent by spokesperson Kathleen O'Keefe at the time, which also noted "members should continue to maintain strike readiness." Payne had said on Monday if the union did strike, all of its 5,600 members at Ford would have been on the picket line at Oakville Assembly Plant, two engine plants in Windsor, parts and distribution centers, offices and technical units. Downtime at those plants could have had implications for production at plants in the United States. “In addition to reaching a master agreement, our members at each Ford location face their own unique set of issues that needed to be resolved by our committees at the bargaining table,” Unifor Ford Master Bargaining Chair John D’Agnolo said in a statement. “This agreement makes the kind of gains our members need today and adds greater financial security for the future.” Obtaining an agreement without a strike action juxtaposes with the United Auto Workers' negotiations strategy. Unifor's approach was more traditional, selecting a lead company to start the pattern with the threat of a national strike if discussions stalled. Meanwhile, the UAW opted to continue talks with all three of the Detroit automakers and on Friday began executing its "stand-up strike" strategy. It has sent one plant on strike from each of the companies with the risk the union could add more as soon as noon on Friday if "substantial progress" isn't made by then. "It looks like Ford was very motivated to secure a deal and Unifor proved a willing dance partner," said Larry Savage, a labor studies professor at Brock University in Ontario. "While we don't know the details of the tentative agreement, we should expect Canadian autoworkers to have made significant gains in this round of bargaining." The question remains if those gains, whatever they are, will be enough to have the agreement ratified by members since the UAW's "militant posture" has raised autoworker expectations, Savage said. "You can bet that the content of that deal is going to be judged relative to what UAW members are expected to secure south of the border." The breakthrough in Canada may serve as a sort of morale booster at Ford and an incentive to get a deal done with the UAW, said Marick Masters, a management professor at Wayne State University. “The more clarity you can bring to the situation, the better at this point in time,” he said. “A strike would have only complicated the situation in the U.S., having adverse implications for Ford and perhaps necessitating the layoff of additional workers, and at the same time, it removes that as a source of Ford’s attention. They can now focus exclusively on negotiations in the U.S.” An agreement between Unifor and Ford without a strike doesn't necessarily mean the Canadian union had the superior strategy, Masters said, but the approaches do reflect the different circumstances in which the unions find themselves. "The UAW is operating in uncharted waters," he said. "The test of the wisdom of this strategy will be time. It's a risky strategy, and you're in a high-risk game. The downside is great. The upside is great. (UAW President) Shawn Fain's leadership is obviously on the line. Everything revolves around whether he gets a successful contract. If he doesn’t, he will probably have just one term in office." Fain was the first UAW president to be elected directly by the rank-and-file. Unifor's leadership is voted upon through locally elected delegates. "The union (Unifor) isn’t encumbered with the internal challenges the UAW has had," Masters said. The UAW "has brand new leadership at a pivotal time, which is more militant. They’re asking for a whole lot. I think they have to know that some of these issues are nonstarters. If they’re insistent on all of that along with the wage increase, in-progression and tiers, they're a long way off from an agreement." Brock University's Savage said the unions have "overlapping priorities," but there are some key differences and Unifor's leadership could see that "gap is significant enough to make a different set of strategic choices." For example, Unifor selected Ford as its focus initially, unlike the UAW, he said. Unifor also hasn’t publicly released what it wants to see from the automakers in terms of wages and other economic gains. "They have made some very different strategic choices,” Savage said. “It sounds like they've been in contact with one another, but there doesn't seem to be any high level of coordination.” There also are issues that affect Unifor's negotiations to a lesser extent, Masters said. For example, the UAW wants to see all of its Detroit Three members receive retirement health care coverage. Canada, meanwhile, has a publicly funded health care system. Additionally, the automakers have announced billions of dollars in commitments to build electric vehicles at its Canadian assembly plants. Stellantis NV is building a battery plant with LG Energy Solution in Windsor as well. In the United States, though, sites like the idled Jeep Cherokee plant in Belvidere, Illinois, and Trenton Engine Complex could be at risk without product promises. The Canadian government has played a more direct role securing an electric-vehicle future for Unifor members, Masters said. Although the White House says it's sending top aids to Detroit to help broker an agreement, the U.S. federal government is more disconnected from granting subsidies and incentives to specific manufacturers. Still, both Unifor and the UAW are seeking increased wages and improved pensions following high rates of inflation, job security and support to transition workers from building internal combustion engine vehicles and their parts to EVs. "The contract," Masters said about Unifor's agreement, "could offer insights into with what Ford might be forthcoming in the U.S." To the UAW, the Blue Oval has offered at least 20% wage increases over four and a half years, a four-year progression to the top wage, a $20 per hour starting wage for temporary employees and the return of a cost-of-living allowance. Unifor's tentative agreement came as the United Auto Workers' strike against all three Detroit automakers in the United States headed toward its sixth day. Unifor in August announced that it had selected Ford to serve as the lead company with which it would bargain to model contracts with the other automakers. Unifor represents around 18,000 autoworkers at Ford, General Motors Co. and Stellantis. |
UAW justifies wage demands Story by The Canadian NEW YORK (AP) — It’s been a central argument for the United Auto Workers union: If Detroit's three automakers raised CEO pay by 40% over the past four years, workers should get similar raises. UAW President Shawn Fain has repeatedly cited the figure, contrasting it with the 6% pay raises autoworkers have received since their last contract in 2019. He opened negotiations with a demand for a similar 40% wage increase over four years, along with the return of pensions and cost of living increases. The UAW has since lowered its demand to a 36% wage increase but the two sides remain far apart in contract talks, triggering a strike. Fain's focus on CEO pay is part of a growing trend of emboldened labor unions citing the wealth gap between workers and the top bosses to bolster demand for better pay and working conditions. In June, Netflix shareholders rejected executive pay packages in a nonbinding vote, just days after the Writers Guild of America wrote letters urging investors to vote against the pay proposals, saying it would be inappropriate amid Hollywood's ongoing strike by writers. The WGA wrote similar letters targeting the executive pay at Comcast and NBCUniversal. Fain has pushed back against arguments that a big pay bump for the union would jack up costs of vehicles and put the Big Three automakers — General Motors, Ford and Stellantis (formerly Chrysler) — at a disadvantage against foreign competitors with lower-cost workforces in the race to transition to electric vehicles. “The reason we ask for 40% pay increases is because in the last four years alone, the CEO pay went up 40%. They’re already millionaires," Fain told CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “Our demands are just. We’re asking for our fair share in this economy and the fruits of our labor." CEO pay has ballooned for decades, while wages for ordinary workers have lagged. But did the Big Three chief executives really get 40% pay increases? Not exactly. “I don’t know where the 40% came from,” said General Motors CEO Mary Barra at a new conference when asked if the UAW’s numbers were accurate. Executive pay is notoriously complicated to calculate because so much of it comes in the form of stock grants or stock options. A detailed look at the compensation packages at all three companies shows how the UAW's claim both overstates and understates reality, depending on the view. THE BIG THREE CEO PAY PACKAGES Barra, the only one of the three who held the role since 2019, is the highest paid, with a compensation package of worth $28.98 million in 2022. The single biggest component was $14.62 million in stock grants, which vest over three years and whose ultimate value depends on stock performance and other metrics. Her pay has increased 34% since 2019, according data from public filings analyzed for AP by Equilar. Ford CEO James Farley received nearly $21 million in total compensation in 2022, a 21% increase over the $17.4 million then-CEO Jim Hackett received in 2019, according to the company's proxy statements. Farley's package last year included $15.14 million in stock awards, which also vest over three years with an ultimate value dependent on performance. Where the the comparison gets complicated is at Stellantis, which was formed in 2021 with the merger of Italian-American conglomerate Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and French PSA Group. Because it is a European company, the way Stellantis discloses executive pay differs significantly from GM and Ford. In its annual renumeration report, Stellantis reported CEO Carlos Tavares' 2022 pay was 23.46 million euros. That's a nearly 77% increase over then Fiat Chrysler CEO Mike Manley's 2019 pay of 13.28 million euros. Those are the numbers used by the UAW when it calculated that three automakers have, collectively, increased CEO pay by 40.1% since 2019, according to the methodology the union provided to The AP. But there's a catch: Stellantis' figures reflect “realized pay,” which include the value of previously granted equity that vested during the reporting year. U.S. companies, in contrast, use grant date value of stock packages awarded to executives during the reporting year. In its analysis, Equilar used the “grant date” method to make an equivalent comparison between all three CEOs. By that measure, Tavares' 2022 compensation was in 21.95 million euros in 2022, including 10.9 million in stock awards with a three-year vesting period. That's actually 24% decline from Manley's compensation package in 2019, which was 29.04 million euros, according to Equilar. THE VOLATILITY OF CEO PAY So, is Tavares really making less than Manley was four years ago? Not really. That's because in some years, talking about a CEO's “realized pay” can obscure exorbitant pay packages approved by company boards. Take Tavares' 2021 compensation package, which included special incentive award of 25 million euros in cash as well as stock worth 19.56 million euros — all contingent on long-term performance goals — granted to Tavares in recognition of “his essential role” in leading the company through the merger. That one-time award, which came on top of millions of more in regular compensation, alone pushed Tavares’ 2021 compensation package far above what Manley got in 2019. Stellantis shareholders voted 52.1% to reject the pay proposal in their annual meeting, though the vote was only advisory and the board approved his package anyway. The CEOs of GM and Ford also saw their compensation packages peak in 2021, before declining slightly in 2022. HOW DOES ALL THIS COMPARE TO REGULAR WORKER PAY? However you slice the numbers, the gap between CEO pay and rank-and-file workers at all three companies is gigantic. At GM, the median worker pay was $80,034 in 2022. It would take that worker 362 years to make Barra's annual compensation. At Ford, where the median pay was $74, 691, it would take 281 years. At Stellantis, with a median pay of 64,328 euros, it would take 365 years, although the company noted its annual report that the disparity includes expenses related to Tavares' one-time grant. Excluding that, the pay ratio is 298-1. How extreme that disparity? It depends on the comparison. It's far above the typical pay gap at S&P 500 companies, which was 186-1 according to AP's annual CEO pay survey, which uses data analyzed by Equilar. And it's astronomical by historical standards. According to a study of the 350 largest publicly traded U.S. firms by the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, the CEO-to-Worker pay ratio was just 15-1 in 1965. The automakers, for their part, emphasize that their foreign competitors pay their workers much less. Including benefits, workers at the Detroit 3 automakers receive around $60 an hour, according to Harry Katz, a labor professor at Cornell University. At foreign-based automakers with U.S. factories, the compensation is about $40 to $45. Then there's Tesla. CEO Elon Musk's 2022 compensation was reported as zero in the company's proxy statement, rendering its official pay ratio meaningless. Of course, that's because Tesla hasn't awarded Musk new packages since a 2018 long-term compensation plan that could potentially be worth more than $50 billion and is facing a legal challenge from shareholders. But the proxy offers glimpse at the mind-boggling wealth disparity between its nonunion workers and one of the world's richest men. The filing reported Musk's total “realized compensation” in 2021 at more than $737 million. A typical Tesla worker earned $40,723 that year. According to the proxy, for that worker to make Musk's “realized compensation” that year, it would take more than 18,000 years. ______ This story has been corrected to reflect Ford’s CEO and his compensation in 2019. The CEO was Jim Hackett, not William Clay Ford, and his compensation was $17.4 million, not $16.76 million. |
UAW strike continues Friday; The Detroit News Three facilities — one from each of the Detroit Three automakers, for the first time in history — remain struck Friday morning after the United Auto Workers contract expired at midnight. The UAW walkouts involve more than 12,900 workers total, split between Ford Motor Co.'s Bronco plant in Wayne, Stellantis NV's Jeep Wrangler plant in Toledo and a General Motor Co. plant in Missouri. There is no bargaining scheduled for Friday. Speaking on CNBC early Friday, GM CEO Mary Barra said that even a single plant going down could have a ripple effect. But she also said that she believed the strike could be resolved "very quickly," noting the "historic offer on the table." "Our GM team members who are representing have told me time and time again that job security is very important to them," Barra said in one of the first hits of what was poised to be a morning-long media blitz. "How you get job security is making sure you have beautifully designed cars, trucks and crossovers that people want to buy. We have those right now for all. All of our vehicles are in strong demand, both our (internal combustion engine) portfolio and our EV portfolios, so we got to get back to work so we don't lose ground." On the line seven hours in, pickets marched at the Michigan Avenue entrances of Ford's Michigan Assembly Plant. Motorists driving by honked their horns as a show of support as TV news trucks filled the median of the street. Striking workers were also getting support from politicians. Democrats in Michigan's legislature signaled their support for the workers, encouraging a quick resolution to the strike. "Michigan’s economy benefits when workers and industry negotiate together, in good faith, to reach consensus," Michigan House Speaker Joe Tate said in a statement released just moments after employees walked out, adding that he wants to see a fair contract for the UAW that "maintains a competitive edge" for the automakers. "The auto industry is Michigan’s legacy and its future, and there is surely a path forward that ensures our workers and our economy can continue to thrive," he continued. President Joe Biden is expected to speak on the strike later today. |
UAW planning targeted strike of Kalea Hall Local United Auto Workers leaders were told in a call with leadership Tuesday night that the union plans a targeted strike of specific plants operated by each of the three Detroit automakers if the sides don't reach tentative agreements by the contract deadline, according to two sources familiar with the matter. The UAW's strategy is slated to unfold if tentative agreements with each of the automakers aren’t reached by 11:59 p.m. Thursday when their current contracts expire. UAW President Shawn Fain is set to have a 5 p.m. Facebook livestream on Wednesday, when he is expected to update members on negotiations and potential strike strategy. He’s already said the union will strike any company that doesn’t have a tentative agreement by the deadline. Fain is slated to appear at a rally with U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, in Detroit after the deadline on Friday, according to a flyer obtained by The Detroit News. “The ultimate goal,” said Marick Masters, a management professor at Wayne State University, “is going to be, if they have to use a strike, is to strike in such a way that is going to get them the best deal from one of the companies in the shortest amount of time to take to the other companies as a template.” Choosing to strike a single plant at each automaker at least initially could, as a result, save funds, but it has drawbacks, too. “That’s a weaker form of the strike,” Masters said. “It takes longer to be felt. It depends on what rolls out in terms of affecting other production sites. It risks dividing the membership.” Solidarity and standing united have been frequent phrases echoed by Fain and other UAW leaders at practice pickets, rallies and other events leading up to the deadline. For a strike to be effective against a single plant, “it has got to have product that’s really critical,” Masters said. “There’s no magic number of plants. They would want to strike the plants that are going to maximize the impact on the company so that if they threaten the company with enough losses that they concede.” How much the automakers could weather strikes partly depends on inventories. In a post shared earlier this month, Michelle Krebs, senior analyst at auto information resource Cox Automotive Inc., said Stellantis' inventories were "bloated" and the highest in the industry. At the end of July, Jeep was at 95 days of supply, Ford was at 77, GMC was at 66 and Chevrolet was at 51, below the industry average of 58 days. Oftentimes, the most impactful action is a national strike, Masters said. In 2019, all UAW-represented employees at GM went on strike for 40 days. It cost GM $3.6 billion, the company said. That contract ultimately resulted in two 3% wage gains, a timeline for rolling over temporary workers to full-time positions, a record $11,000 ratification bonus and saving the Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly Plant from closure. But after four more years of major profits, though, UAW leaders say the time is now to recover what was bargained away to save the companies during the Great Recession and bankruptcies. Its initial proposal from more than a month ago sought a 46% wage increase (40% not compounded), though that request since has dropped at least to 36% not compounded. It also has been demanding pensions and retiree health care for all workers, 90 days for full-time workers to get to the top pay and cost-of-living wage adjustments. Fain on Monday on CNN characterized the progress as "slow." GM President Mark Reuss called these labor negotiations "truly historic" at the Automotive News Congress event in Detroit on Tuesday: "We've made a lot of progress over the last few days. "From a GM standpoint, we're here to win, and this is a very intense marketplace. The goal is to reward our team members, our employees, our stakeholders, and we also have to invest in the future, which we're doing in that intense marketplace to win." If the union does strike all three, it’s on the hook to pay about 145,000 members a $500 stipend per week. Although its Strike and Defense Fund sits at more than $825 million, it would cover up to 11 weeks of strike pay — not factoring in additional expenses related to health care for striking workers or other ongoing strikes in which the union is involved. There’s a significant impact on the greater economy, as well: Anderson Economic Group estimates a 10-day strike at all three companies could cost the U.S. economy $5.6 billion. |
The United Auto Workers may September 13, 2023 That morally grotesque and growing inequality is exactly what has been occurring in the automobile industry for decades. This time, however, under new union leadership, the members of the United Auto Workers (UAW) are fighting back. If the big three automakers (General Motors, Ford and Stellantis) do not provide reasonable contracts to address longstanding inequities in the industry, there will be a strike – and all of us should support the strikers. The UAW members will be fighting not only for themselves but against a corporate culture of arrogance, cruelty and selfishness causing massive and unnecessary pain for the majority of working families throughout the country. Their fight against corporate greed is our fight. Their victory will resonate all across the economy, impact millions of workers from coast to coast and help create a more just and equitable economy. What are some of the issues that are pushing UAW members to strike? At the top of the list is the extraordinary level of corporate greed shown by industry leaders. In the first half of 2023 the big three automakers made a combined $21bn in profits – up 80% from the same time period last year. Over the past decade, these same companies made some $250bn in profits in North America alone. Yet last year, the big three spent $9bn – not to improve the lives of their workers, not to make their factories safer, but on stock buybacks and dividends to make their wealthy executives and stockholders even richer. Further, while many of their workers are struggling to survive financially, last year the CEO of General Motors raked in about $29m in total compensation, the CEO of Ford approximately $21m and the CEO of Stellantis over $25m. Incredibly, over the last four years, CEO pay at the big three has increased by more than 40%. While auto industry CEOs and stockholders make out like bandits, the workers who build the vehicles earn totally inadequate wages and, over the last several decades, have fallen further and further behind. There was once a time when a union job in the automobile industry was the gold standard for the working class of this country. Those days are long gone. The average starting wage at the big three today is around $17 an hour – less than a number of non-union auto plants around the country. The top wage is $32.32 an hour. Unbelievably, over the last 20 years, the average wage for American autoworkers has decreased by 30% after adjusting for inflation. The reality is that autoworkers at the big three are earning less today than they did 15 years ago. What the UAW is fighting for is not radical. It is the totally reasonable demand that autoworkers, who have made enormous financial sacrifices over the past 40 years, finally receive a fair share of the record-breaking profits their labor has generated. What does that mean? It means that if the big three can afford to give a pay raise of more than 40% to their CEOs, they should be able to provide the same type of pay raise for the autoworkers who make their products. And let’s be clear. While decent wages are a key demand for the UAW, there are other important contract changes that the union has proposed. The union, quite appropriately, wants to get rid of the two-tier system under which newer workers earn lower wages and receive less generous benefits than others doing the same exact work. They want to end the use of “temporary workers” who are ruthlessly exploited and treated like second-class citizens. They want to make sure that all autoworkers receive a decent pension plan and retiree health benefits so that they can retire with the respect and the dignity they deserve. They want to make sure that autoworkers have the right to strike when the big three announce that they will be shutting down a plant. Over the past 20 years, the big three have shut down 65 factories and shipped tens of thousands of jobs overseas where they can pay workers starvation wages with no benefits. The union also wants to make sure, as the industry proposes to build 10 new electric vehicle battery plants, that the workers in these plants become part of the UAW and receive the same wages and benefits as union members. As we transition away from fossil fuels and move toward electric vehicles in the fight to combat the climate crisis, the UAW wants to make sure that the green jobs of the future are well-paying, union jobs. The CEOs of the big three and their masters on Wall Street must understand they cannot have it all. Decade after decade their greed has decimated the middle class, hollowed out communities throughout our country and caused massive economic suffering for the working class of America. These CEOs have created a destructive race to the bottom in a global quest for cheap labor and lax environmental standards. Enough is enough! Let us stand together to put an end to corporate greed and start rebuilding our struggling middle class. Let us stand in solidarity with the UAW and create an economy that works for all, not just the privileged few.
|
UAW president Fain sees Breana Noble United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain said Friday the Detroit Three automakers are showing signs of movement toward the union's demands less than a week from the current contracts' expiration date. His comments came hours after Jeep maker Stellantis NV submitted its first economics counterproposal to the union's demands from last month that included a 14.5% wage increase. Fain also shared that Ford Motor Co. had made updates to its proposal, including offering a cost-of-living wage adjustment, a shorter progression to the top wage and a cap on the use of temporary employees. "I want to be clear: This is movement," Fain said during a Facebook livestream. "We went from 9% to 14.5% at Stellantis. That's happening because we're putting on pressure. "But I want to be clear about something else, too. A 14.5% increase over four years is deeply inadequate. It doesn't make up for inflation, it doesn't make up for decades of falling wages and it doesn't reflect the massive profits we've generated for this company." During his address, Fain shook his head while donning a "Don't want to strike, but I will" button in front of a full office trashcan labeled "Big Three Proposals." Stellantis' counterproposal is above the wage increases offered by its crosstown rivals. Ford Motor Co. last week offered a 9% wage hike that it has since raised to 10%, and General Motors Co. on Thursday proposed a 10% boost. It, however, remains a far cry from the UAW's requested 46% increase (40% without compounding). Unlike the GM and Ford counters, Stellantis doesn't include additional lump-sum payments as part of its wage proposal. There are about 145,000 UAW members at the Detroit Three, including roughly 43,000 at Stellantis. Stellantis' proposal would bring the maximum wage for production operators to about $36.37 per hour by the end of a new agreement, up from the present $31.77. Stellantis declined to provide a breakdown of when the increases would occur. A flyer from the union also said that for UAW-represented salaried workers, the proposal offers only lump sum payments and no wage increases. "This is a responsible and strong offer that positions us to continue providing good jobs for our employees today and in the next generation here in the U.S.," Mark Stewart, chief operating officer for Stellantis in North America, said in an email to employees on Friday. "It also protects the Company’s future ability to continue to compete globally in an industry that is rapidly transitioning to electric vehicles." Meanwhile, "COLA is back," said Fain, announcing that Ford's latest offer included a cost-of-living wage adjustment. He, however, also characterized the formula as "deeply inadequate," saying it would provide no increases for 10 of the past 13 years and is projected to add no raises over the next four years. Ford's original proposal featured lump-sum bonuses with an initial first-year payment of $6,000. Another $6,000 would've been spread throughout the contract life. By incorporating an adjustment for inflation in workers' wages instead, the benefit has the potential to compound. Offers from Stellantis and GM looked similar to Ford's first proposal. Stellantis suggested a one-time $6,000 inflation protection payment in year one and $4,500 in inflation protection payments over the final three years of the contract. GM offered an initial $6,000 and another $5,000 over the contract life. Ford also moved on the UAW's request for a shorter progression timeline to the top wage. Its latest proposal suggests five years instead of the current previous years. Its offer before that had stood at six years — the same offered by GM and Stellantis. The union wants workers to be at top wage after just 90 days like it was until the mid-1990s. The companies, meanwhile, have rejected the union's demand for all workers to receive a pension and health care in retirement. All three companies have proposed increasing the starting pay for temporary and supplemental employees to $20 per hour, up from as low as $15.78 per hour at Stellantis. Ford's latest offer includes an 8% cap on temps, but Fain was critical that none of the proposals create a pathway for temps to full-time positions. The union also has requested more paid time off, the right to strike in the event of a plant closure, and for what it calls the Working Family Protection Program that would effectively bring back what was known as the jobs bank where laid-off workers got paid for doing community service. Fain described a proposal from Ford that he says would allow the company "unilaterally" to outsource work at any time. The Dearborn automaker also included a two-week parental leave; the company currently offers only maternity leave to hourly employees. Stellantis and GM have offered to make Juneteenth a paid holiday. Ford spokeswoman Jessica Enoch, in a statement earlier on Friday, said the Blue Oval remains "committed to creating opportunity for every UAW worker to build a great career and become a full-time permanent Ford employee with good middle-class wages and benefits." In a statement, GM spokesperson David Barnas said: “Our offer has been developed considering everything in our environment, including competitor offers and what is important to our team members. It includes well-deserved wage improvements that far exceed the 2019 agreement. We still have work to do, but we will continue to bargain in good faith with the UAW and work towards an outcome that recognizes the vital role of our team members in GM’s success.” The results continue to show the parties have a large gap they must close in the coming days to avoid a work stoppage, said Marick Masters, a management professor at Wayne State University. "They’re still very far apart," he said. "They'll need an unexpected breakthrough to avoid a strike." On the surface, a 14.5% pay increase to get over $37 per hour would be a positive outcome if it was paired with a cost-of-living wage adjustment, said Lynda Jackson, 36, of Detroit, a team leader at Stellantis' Jefferson North Assembly Plant in Detroit and 13-year UAW member. But given that a late-July proposal from her employer suggested workers sharing a larger portion of health care costs, she would want to see a more complete picture. "The 14.5% increase," she said, "doesn’t mean anything if we can't see what it is you're trying to take away." She also wants to see workers like herself receive a pension like the workers before her did and for supplemental workers to have job security. "I kind of feel like they threw something together because of the unfair practice charge the UAW put on them. Like, 'Hey, we offered them something.' There wasn’t a whole lot of substance." With less than a week before the 11:59 p.m. expiration time on Thursday, Stellantis is the final of the Detroit Three automakers to submit its proposal after the UAW provided its demands last month. Last week, the UAW submitted unfair labor practice charges against Stellantis and GM with the National Labor Relations Board, because it still had not received an economic counterproposal from those two companies. Fain this week said the union will strike any of the companies with which it doesn't have a tentative agreement by the time the current contract expires. He confirmed on the livestream that the union could strike all three, if needed. The cost of that could be substantial. Estimates from the East Lansing-based Anderson Economic Group, a consulting firm that also does business with the automakers, suggest a 10-day strike at all three could represent a total loss of $5.6 billion to the economy. CEO Patrick Anderson has called a potential UAW strike of all three Detroit automakers an "extremely risky" proposition for the union. But with less than a week to go before the deadline, he wrote in a note Friday that the group believes a strike against at least one of the companies is likely. "The difference between the automakers and the unions on wages is a gap that could be closed," he wrote. "The differences involving non-wage demands are a gulf, not a gap." Non-wage demands such as restoration of a cost-of-living adjustment and defined benefit pension plans, he believes, "raise the risk of a contract that causes a bankruptcy-level risk for the automakers when a future downturn occurs." |
WD-40 says it will not be banned, September 11, 2023 American-made WD-40 already complies with Canada's new rules limiting volatile organic compounds in household goods The WD-40 Company issued a statement Thursday saying its products would still be available in Canada under a new formulation after Ottawa imposes new restrictions on the compound used in the original formula of the hugely popular penetrating oil spray. In January 2022, details of new regulations in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act were published in the Canada Gazette, aiming to set maximum concentrations for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) — certain chemicals with boiling points low enough to allow them to exist as an atmospheric vapour at room temperature. That led to concerns showing up on social media from fans of the lubricant and rust-prevention spray that the new regulations would effectively ban WD-40 when they come into force in January 2024. “It has recently come to our attention that false information is circulating online that WD-40 brand products are being banned in Canada,” read the company’s statement. “This is not a true statement. Although there are currently regulatory changes taking place in Canada, we have been aware of these regulatory changes and have been preparing for them for some time.” The statement stated that all WD-40 products will comply with the new regulations and will still be available for sale in the new year. While most VOCs found on earth are produced by living organisms, Canada’s new regulations limit manufactured sources, specifically solvents used by many industries. Aside from spray lubricants, the new regulations will also impact health and beauty products such as aerosol deodorant, hair spray and perfumes, household products including air fresheners, dusters, disinfectants and floor and carpet cleaners, and industrial chemicals like brake cleaner, paint remover, cleaners, lubricants and spray paints. VOCs are considered pollutants that contribute to the formation of smog. Under Canada’s new regulations, any aerosol multi-purpose or penetrating non-solid lubricant will be limited to a maximum VOC concentration of 25 per cent. Regulations limiting VOCs in certain U.S. states prompted many manufacturers to reformulate their products. WD-40 sold in the U.S. already complies with Canadian rules. According to Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) obtained by the National Post, WD-40 formulations sold in Canada contain between 50 and 70 per cent aliphatic hydrocarbons. Conversely, the MSDS for WD-40 sold in the U.S. specifically lists the product as using between 10 and 20 per cent low-vapour pressure aliphatic hydrocarbons in its formulations, which is well below Canada’s impending statutory limits. National Post |
GM offers UAW workers a David Welch, Bloomberg News An attendee holds a United Auto Workers (UAW) sign during a campaign rally for Randy Bryce, Democratic U.S. Representative candidate from Wisconsin, not pictured, in Racine, Wisconsin, U.S., on Saturday, Feb. 24, 2018. Bryce, a union ironworker, is hoping to defeat Republican U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan to represent Wisconsin's 1st district. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg , Bloomberg General Motors Co. made a counteroffer to the United Auto Workers union, proposing a total 16 per cent pay raise for the top wage earners in its plants and a 56 per cent hike for newer employees who make less, the company said in a statement. UAW President Shawn Fain reacted quickly saying the proposal is “insulting.” The pay raise is slightly higher than what rival Ford Motor Co. offered the union, but is still well short of the 46 per cent raise that would result from the UAW’s opening bid. GM also included US$11,000 in inflation protection payments, a shortened period to the top wage and better pay for temporary staff. GM made the offer with a week to go before the union’s contract with the automaker and rivals Ford and Stellantis NV expires and all companies far apart from Fain’s opening proposal. In addition to a much bigger raise, Fain wants to reinstate guaranteed pensions, cost-of-living allowances and retiree healthcare. “After refusing to bargain in good faith for the past six weeks, only after having federal labour board charges filed against them, GM has come to the table with an insulting proposal that doesn’t come close to an equitable agreement for America’s autoworkers,” Fain said in a statement. “GM either doesn’t care or isn’t listening when we say we need economic justice. The clock is ticking. Stop wasting our members’ time. Tick tock.” The GM offer is slightly better than Ford’s proposal, which Fain rejected and said, “insults our very worth.” The GM and Ford offers do not include retiree benefits, which went away in 2007 for new hires. Workers hired after 2006 get 401K plans. Fain’s initial proposal brought back retiree benefits, which are a big piece of the added expense for labour that automakers believe would drive up costs by $80 billion over four years. GM’s offered to give inflation protection with a $6,000 one-time payment and another $5,000 over the life of the agreement. That’s $1,000 less in total than Ford offered. Both companies give entry-level workers the top wage of about $32 an hour after six years. GM’s offer would get them to a minimum of $28 after four years. GM also offered to recognize Juneteenth as a paid holiday. GM shares were down 1 per cent at 12:39 p.m. Thursday in New York. |
UAW president says union has Story by Michael Wayland
DETROIT — United Auto Workers has filed unfair labor practice charges against automakers General Motors and Stellantis to the National Labor Relations Board for not bargaining with the union in good faith or a timely manner, UAW President Shawn Fain said Thursday night. The Thursday filings followed the companies not responding to the union's demands in a timely matter, Fain said. The union did not file a complaint against Ford Motor, as Fain said the company responded to the UAW's demands with a counterproposal he heavily criticized. "GM and Stellantis' willful refusal to bargain in good faith is not only insulting and counterproductive, it's also illegal," Fain said during a Facebook Live. "That's why today, our union filed unfair labor practice charges, or ULPs, against both GM and Stellantis with the National Labor Relations Board." Stellantis said it has not yet received the NLRB complaint, "but is shocked by Mr. Fain's claims that we have not bargained in good faith." "This is a claim with no basis in fact, and we are disappointed to learn that Mr. Fain is more focused on filing frivolous legal charges than on actual bargaining," the company said in an emailed statement. "We will vigorously defend this charge when the time comes, but right now we are more focused on continuing to bargain in good faith for a new agreement. We will not allow Mr. Fain's tactics to distract us from that important work to secure the future for our employees." GM's statement echoed Stellantis' regarding the NLRB charges: "We are surprised by and strongly refute the NLRB charge filed by the International UAW. We believe it has no merit and is an insult to the bargaining committees. We have been hyper-focused on negotiating directly and in good faith with the UAW and are making progress," said Gerald Johnson, GM executive vice president of global manufacturing. The NLRB also did not immediately respond regarding additional details of the filings. Regarding Ford's recent proposal, Fain called it "concessionary." He said it included a 9% wage increase over the four-year term of the deal, one-time lump sum bonuses and unlimited use of temporary workers who are paid less and don't have the same benefits. The company also rejected "all of" the union's job security proposals and "quality of life proposals" such as additional paid holidays and a shorter work week, Fain said. "Ford's wage proposals not only failed to meet our needs, it insults our very worth," Fain said. In response to the comments, Ford released a lengthy statement by CEO Jim Farley and additional details of its proposal compared with the prior negotiations four years ago, including 15% guaranteed combined wage increases and lump sum payments. "This would be an important deal for our workers, and it would allow for the continuation of Ford's unique position as the most American automaker — and give us the flexibility we need within our manufacturing footprint to respond to customer demand as the industry transforms," Farley said in the publicly released statement. "This offer would also allow Ford to compete, invest in new products, grow and share that future success with our employees through profit sharing." Ford noted that its proposal includes a six-year grow-in period to top wages compared to eight years; $12,000 "cost-of-living" bonuses over the span of the deal; $5,500 ratification bonuses; 25% increase in base wages for temporary workers; and other improvements over the last contract but not in line with the union's previous demands. The union's demands have included a 46% wage increase, restoration of traditional pensions, cost-of-living increases, reducing the workweek to 32 hours from 40 and increasing retiree benefits. |
Unifor picks Ford for pattern Pensions, wage improvements, investments, supports for EV transition main priorities Dale Molnar · Unifor president Lana Payne says Ford Motor Company of Canada Ltd. has been chosen as the target for negotiations as the union looks to work out new contracts for autoworkers. (CBC News) Unifor has chosen the Ford Motor Company of Canada Ltd. as the target for negotiations as the union looks to work out new contracts for autoworkers. "I was encouraged by Ford Motor Company's transparency with our union on product programs and business plans," Unifor president Lana Payne said during a news conference in Toronto on Tuesday afternoon. Three automakers — Ford, Stellantis and General Motors — engage in pattern bargaining, where a deal with the target company will set the template for agreements with other two. Across the three companies, Unifor represents more than 19,600 autoworkers. Payne suggested on Aug. 10 at the kickoff of talks that Ford would likely be the choice because of co-operation Ford had already shown. She said progress has already been made at the subcommittee levels since talks began in earnest on Aug. 22. Payne repeated four main priorities for the union during these negotiations: pensions, wage improvements, investments and supports for the transition to producing electric vehicles. Bargaining comes this time while the United Auto Workers (UAW) is also negotiating deals in the U.S. and analysts are predicting strikes at all Detroit Three automakers. Tallying the costs of striking Patrick Anderson, chief executive officer of Anderson Economic Group, a consulting firm that does work in the auto industry, predicts a 10-day strike at all three of the Detroit automakers would cost the companies and workers $5.6 billion US. He said it would also affect Canada. "It's a serious interest to people who are in Ontario and Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, and it is something that won't stay on one side of the border," said Anderson. Over the weekend, autoworkers in Ontario voted 99 per cent in favour of striking. Unifor bargaining teams for GM and Stellantis will now go home, while the Ford bargaining team, chaired by Local 200 president John D'Agnolo, will continue talks in Toronto. D'Agnolo was pleased with the announcement and said he will collaborate with Stellantis chair James Stewart and GM chair Jason Gale every day during the negotiations. Both Gale and Stewart offered their support and congratulations to the Ford committee. "I'm looking forward to it. We have a great team led by Lana and the national staff ... and I can't wait to get at it," said D'Agnolo. The strike deadline is Sept.18. |
Canada's Unifor joins UAW in Jordyn Grzelewski Members of Unifor, the union representing autoworkers in Canada, have voted to authorize strikes against Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV if agreements on new contracts aren't reached next month. The union reported that Unifor members voted nearly 99% in favor at Ford, 99% at GM and more than 98% at Stellantis. Unifor's collective bargaining agreements with the automakers expire at 11:59 p.m. Sept. 18. “Canadian autoworkers have sent a strong message to D3 automakers that they are united behind our bargaining committees in an effort to improve pensions, increase wages, and secure good, union jobs in the EV future,” Unifor President Lana Payne said in a statement. “Our bargaining teams are set to resume negotiations with the unwavering support of Unifor members across the auto sector. Make no mistake, our union is fully prepared to take any and all necessary action to achieve our collective bargaining objectives.” The union, which started bargaining with the companies earlier this month, is resuming negotiations after pausing to hold the strike authorization votes over the weekend. Unifor represents about 18,000 autoworkers at the Detroit auto companies. Unifor's strike authorization comes days after members of the United Auto Workers, which represents Detroit Three autoworkers in the United States, also voted overwhelmingly in favor of authorizing strikes against the companies. The UAW's contracts with the companies expire at 11:59 p.m. Sept. 14. Strike authorization votes are formalities and don't necessarily mean a strike will occur, but they give unions leverage in negotiations and authorize leaders to call a walkout if deemed necessary. The two unions are in negotiations with the Detroit automakers at the same time for the first time in a generation. |
Unifor Detroit Three Unifor AutoTalks TORONTO— Unifor members at Ford Motor Company, General Motors and Stellantis have delivered overwhelming strike mandates, authorizing their bargaining committees to take job action, if needed, to achieve fair collective agreements with the Detroit Three (D3). “Canadian autoworkers have sent a strong message to D3 automakers that they are united behind our bargaining committees in an effort to improve pensions, increase wages, and secure good, union jobs in the EV future,” said Unifor National President Lana Payne. “Our bargaining teams are set to resume negotiations with the unwavering support of Unifor members across the auto sector. Make no mistake, our union is fully prepared to take any and all necessary action to achieve our collective bargaining objectives.” Unifor paused negotiations to hold the strike votes over the course of the weekend. The results of the strike votes are tabulated and broken down by company below. Strike vote results Ford Motor Company: 98.9% in favour The current Detroit 3 collective agreements expire at 11:59 p.m. on September 18, 2023. The union opened formal negotiations with the automakers on August 10 in Toronto, representing 18,000 autoworkers covered by collective agreements. Unifor will continue to provide regular updates on the status of negotiations at autotalks.ca Unifor is Canada's largest union in the private sector and represents 315,000 workers in every major area of the economy. The union advocates for all working people and their rights, fights for equality and social justice in Canada and abroad, and strives to create progressive change for a better future. |
UAW president threatens Breana Noble Detroit — Dozens of United Auto Workers and supportive community members marched outside a Jeep Grand Cherokee plant here in a practice picket that will become real Sept. 15 if the Detroit Three automakers don't cooperate, the union's president said on Wednesday. "We've got 22 days until the deadline," UAW President Shawn Fain said at the gathering. "These companies better come to the table. The clock is ticking. I can tell you right now, every indication is that if they don't get their s--- together, we're going to be doing what we're going to do here in a little bit." Holding "Record profits, record contracts" signs and chanting, "Tick tock" and other phrases, a sea of red-clad workers gathered in a strip-mall parking lot off Conner Street with a backdrop of Stellanits NV's Mack Assembly Plant on the east side. The group walked in front of a nearby gate entrance to the plant. The picket that was organized by members wasn't a work stoppage, but was meant to bring together autoworkers around a core purpose and raise awareness of the union's demands for a new contract, organizers said. "Have you seen the price of a gallon of milk?" said Nathan Burks, 48, of Detroit, a UAW member of five years who works in skilled trades who says at $27.52 per hour, he's still a few years away from reaching the top of his pay scale. "It's more expensive to buy food that's healthy for you than the cheaper junk food. I can be making the same as an employee at Target. We used to be the powerhouses of the economy. Now we're not." The UAW's demands entail a 46% wage increase over four years for 145,000 employees, a 32-hour work week for 40 hours' pay, rolling over all current temporary/supplemental employees to full-time, and restoring cost-of-living adjustments, pensions and retiree health care for all. The total demands could increase total labor costs, including wages and benefits, to more than $100 per hour per worker. The automakers' current all-in labor costs are around $65 per hour compared to $55 at foreign automakers and $45 at Tesla Inc. "We're not asking to be millionaires," Fain said. "We're just asking for our fair share so we can survive." Fain said he's headed to similar events in the coming days with stops planned at Ford Motor Co.'s Kentucky Truck Plant and Louisville Assembly Plant on Thursday and Friday, respectively. Although the union hasn't declared a lead company, Fain says not to read into the locations of the rallies as they are based on his schedule and invitations from locals. The picket comes as the union is wrapping up strike authorization votes, the results of which are expected on Friday. Local unions that have posted their results show overwhelming support for the procedural vote. "The workers are pissed off and they're fed up," Fain said. "They want their share — not just our workers, workers everywhere, workers that don't have a voice right now, because they don't have a union." Shaheena Allen, 42, of Detroit, a UAW member of almost three years who works at the Mack plant, said she voted to support the strike authorization. "We're doing the same, equal work, and not getting the same equal pay," she said. "It's not right. We actively need better things for a contract, so why not (strike)?" Among the marchers was U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, who emphasized the sacrifices the UAW has made in previous contracts to keep the companies afloat. "Workers have saved our country over and over again," she said. "I can't understand in 2023, these CEOs are now being stingy. I looked. They're making record profits. Shareholders are getting their payouts. These folks are busting their butts every day, and they're not getting their fair share." In 2022, General Motors Co., Stellantis and Ford reported adjusted operating income in North America, respectively, of $13 billion, $15.2 billion and $9.2 billion. Stellantis' profit-sharing checks were the highest at $14,760, followed by GM workers receiving $12,750 and Ford's, $9,176. Temporary and supplemental workers, however, don't receive profit-sharing checks. Also on workers' minds is product allocation. Dan Steele, 30, of Toledo, Ohio, says he was laid off on Friday for a year from his job in materials delivery at Stellantis' Dundee Engine Plant. The automaker is investing $83 million there to produce a new 1.6-liter, I-4 turbocharged engine with direct fuel injection for two plug-in hybrid models it will sell in North America, but there's space for more after the automaker has ended production of the Tigershark 2.4-liter I-4 engine. "It is nerve-racking," Steele said. "We need (product), because I don't think Stellantis even wants to build anything here." Stellantis in previous statements has said it's committed to working with the UAW to negotiate a new agreement that balances workers' concerns and its vision to compete in the marketplace in the future. Other UAW members say they came out to show their support to leave behind a strong contract for future generations. "Workers fought to lay the foundation for me," said Charles Roberts, 54, of Detroit, who has been a UAW member for 30 years and is a continuous improvement lead at Mack. "I want to pay it forward, and give it back. It could be better for the younger workers." |
Retiree Gary Ellwood Passes
It is with great sadness that we inform you of the passing of Retiree Gary Ellwood. He passed away Thursday August 24, Gary retired October 1, 2004 with 38.2 years of service. Celebration Of Life Gathering Information for Garry Lorne Ellwood (mckersieearly.com) Obituary Loving husband to Mary Ann for 29 years, cherished Father of Terry (Lee Ann), Scott and Stepson Jerry (Lorna). Garry was an animal lover and a Nascar enthusiast. Garry was a proud worker for Ford Canada for 38 years. Family and friends are welcome to gather at the McKersie & Early Funeral Home to celebrate Garry’s life on Donations in honour of Garry can be made to the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Humane Society ( please see donation links below )
|
‘No trucks in, no trucks out.’ Some 3,700 workers at 27 Metro stores have been on strike since July 29 after overwhelmingly voting against a tentative deal with company. By Josh Rubin Business Reporter As a strike by 3,700 workers at GTA Metro grocery stores nears the one-month mark, union members are turning up the heat by picketing at two of the grocery chain’s distribution warehouses. The company responded just hours later by filing an unfair labour practice complaint against the union. Picketing began at the two Etobicoke warehouses Wednesday morning, and a leading food industry expert said it could lead to shortages at some Metro stores which are still open. “Logistics could become an issue and we could see some shortages on shelves,” said Sylvain Charlebois, director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University. “This is all about disrupting the business continuity. The backbone of any grocery company is its distribution centres and warehouses.” Members of Unifor Local 414 have been on strike since July 29, a day after rejecting a tentative agreement. At a rainy picket line Wednesday morning, Unifor national president Lana Payne said the goal was simple: Keep trucks from loading up at the warehouses. “No trucks in, no trucks out. No produce, no meat. This is part of their supply chain,” said Payne to loud cheers from a lively crowd of a few hundred picketers in the driveway of the Metro warehouse in Etobicoke. “In case this employer was not getting the message before today, they’re getting it now.” As Payne spoke, trucks could be seen idling at an underpass across the street from the warehouse. A spokesperson for Metro blasted the picketing at the warehouses which supply 247 still-open Metro and Food Basic stores across Ontario. “They are currently preventing all deliveries of fresh products to our stores which is unacceptable,” said Marie-Claude Bacon. “The distribution centres and the impacted stores are not on strike and their operations, which are critical, should not be interfered with.” Bacon said the company has been asking the union to come back to the bargaining table since Aug. 12, but the union has rejected those requests. Late Wednesday afternoon, the company said it had filed an unfair labour practice complaint against Unifor with the Ontario Labour Relations Board. “The union has refused to return to the bargaining table for the purpose of allowing Metro to present an offer in an effort to resolve the current labour conflict, despite repeated invitations on Metro’s part,” Bacon said in a written statement. “The Union has breached its duty to bargain in good faith and to make every reasonable effort to negotiate a collective agreement.” In an emailed statement, Payne criticized Metro’s complaint to the OLRB, and said the union would be review it with its lawyers. “What’s unfair is Metro’s refusal to provide decent work and pay to its 3,700 frontline grocery workers,” Payne said. It’s clear the two sides have given up hope of reaching an agreement at the bargaining table, and are now resorting to other tools, said Rafael Gomez, director of the Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources at the University of Toronto. For the union, it’s turning up the picketing heat. For the company, the legal heat. “This is two parties trying to increase the cost for each other,” he said. “In the modern context, this is getting ugly.” The OLRB, Gomez said, could issue an injunction barring the warehouse picketing, or order the two sides back to the negotiating table. They could even, he added, order binding arbitration, though that would be exceedingly rare. The company also said it’s considering seeking a court injunction to end the warehouse picketing. At one downtown Toronto Metro store Wednesday afternoon, customers were already starting to notice the impact of the warehouse picketing. “No broccoli or escarole?,” one disappointed customers asked a store employee, who shook their head in response. “Nah, we didn’t get the delivery today,” said the employee. “They’re protesting at our warehouse.” There were other missing items: The area usually filled with fresh Ontario corn on the cob was completely empty, and there were a few empty spots in the store’s meat department shelves. Unifor represents 3,700 full- and part-time employees at 27 Metro stores in the GTA. Those 27 stores are closed during the strike, but Metro also has several GTA non-Unifor stores that remain open. Union members had initially limited their picketing to the 27 closed stores, but stepped up their efforts last week and began picketing outside some of the open non-Unifor Metro locations. Last week, the union declined the company’s offer to meet with a provincially-appointed mediator saying Metro had shown no signs it was willing to improve upon a tentative deal rejected by Local 414 members. That rejection, announced July 28, prompted the strike. On the picket line, Payne said there’s no point in coming back to the table, arguing that the company has shown no sign of improving the already-rejected deal. “They haven’t proposed a decent offer yet. We’re not going to waste our time at the bargaining table until they understand how serious we are right now,” said Payne. One of the sticking points, said Local 414 president Gord Currie, is that members wanted an immediate reinstatement of the $2 an hour “hero pay” bonus that they got during the early part of the pandemic. “I said ‘when you take that away, there’s going to be a problem.’ They took it away, and here’s the problem now. We have 27 stores and angry members looking for that money back,” said Currie. “They want that money up front, but Metro isn’t listening. They need to wake up.” Metro has said the tentative agreement, which had been recommended by union leadership, would have given full-time and “senior” part-time workers raises totalling $3.75 an hour over the life of the four-year deal, while other part-timers would have seen raises totalling $2.65 an hour. The rejected deal gave full-time employees a $1.05 an hour raise in the first year of the deal, along with 90 cent raises in the following three years. Full-time employees at the 27 Metro stores in the GTA earn an average of $22.60 an hour, while part-timers get $16.62, according to Unifor. |
Wild horse: 800-hp, $300k Henry Payne Mustang is saddling up to take on Europe’s elite sports cars. Ford Motor Co. took the wraps off Thursday of a track-focused, 800-plus horsepower, estimated-$300,000 supercar version of the seventh-generation Mustang at the Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance. Badged the Mustang GTD, it will compete with European track weapons like the Porsche 911 GT3 RS, Mercedes AMG GT Black and Aston Martin Vulcan. The carbon-fiber-skinned pony was developed by Ford racing partner Multimatic and contains many of the elements of Ford’s GT3 race car that will debut at IMSA’s Rolex 24 Hours of Daytona next January — including a huge rear swan wing and rear-mounted transmission. The GTD badge is a reference to IMSA’s GTD race class that the race car will compete in. Like the 2019 Multimatic-developed, mid-engine Ford GT Mk II, the 2025 GTD will be available as a limited-edition model late in 2024. “This is something that’s been in my head for five decades,” said Ford CEO Jim Farley, who moonlights as an amateur race driver. “The GTD takes on the best sports cars in the world.” Such track-focused weapons have typically come out of the stables of exotic makers. The winged McLaren Senna, for example, cost $1.1 million and the Aston Martin Vulcan — of which just 24 copies were made — cost $2.3 million. The Mustang sets its sights on the Porsche GT3 RS, a similarly-priced beast that set the Nürburgring track record earlier this year. The Mustang’s sophisticated aerodynamics, suspension and engine are optimized to clock similar, eye-watering, sub-7 minute Nürburgring times. The GTD sports a similar-displacement, supercharged, 5.2-liter engine as Ford’s last-generation, 760-horsepower Shelby Mustang GT500, but the engine is otherwise bespoke to GTD. To attain its 800-plus horsepower (the most by a production ‘Stang ever) the beast is fed with dual air inlets with a 7,500 RPM redline, houses a carbon-fiber driveshaft, and is outfitted with a dry-sump oil system to keep the engine lubricated during sustained high-g-load cornering. Available is a titanium active valve exhaust system for maximum ear-splitting terror. That beastly powerplant is mated to a dual-clutch, 8-speed transmission mounted in the rear of the car for 50-50 weight balance. The rear transaxle transmission is a first for Mustang. Ford draws on the racing experience of Canada’s Multimatic, which builds the Mustang GT3 and GT4 race cars for competition. Multimatic also built the $500,000 mid-engine Ford GT beginning in 2016 and provides the chassis for race teams like Porsche-Penske’s 963 IMSA porotype. “We did some radical things with the GTD,” said Larry Holt, Multimatic executive vice president for special vehicle operations. “Inboard rear suspension, titanium exhaust, magnesium wheels and the gearbox in the rear of the car. The Mustang GTD sets a new benchmark for roadgoing racers.” The GTD will start life at the Ford Flat Rock Assembly Plant and then be transported to Multimatic facilities in Markham, Canada, where the auto supplier's elves will work their magic. Engineered for the street and track, the GTD is outfitted with two suspension settings. In track mode, the Mustang can be lowered by over 1.5 inches to maximize aerodynamic efficiency. For maximum stick through corners, the Mustang boasts Michelin Cup 2 tires. They measure 12.8 inches in the front (the width of the Ford GT’s rear tires) and 13.6 inches in the rear. Unlike the GT3 racer’s wheels, which are limited to 18-inch rims, the GTD’s rubber will be wrapped around 20-inch forged aluminum wheels or available forged magnesium wheels. Special, spool-valve Multimatic shocks at all four corners will help the car read the road. Such engineering sophistication is clearly aimed at the $240k Porsche’ GT3 RS, long considered the segment’s banchmark. The Porsche features similar dry-sump engine and aerodynamic tweaks — though mere 12-inch rear and 10.8-inch front Michelin Cup 2 tires and 518 horsepower. The GT3 RS, in the hands of legendary racer Jorg Bergmeister, conquered the 14-mile Nürburgring course in 6 minutes, 49 seconds last spring — a record for normally-aspirated cars. With another 300 horses thanks to its supercharger, the GTD may well eclipse the Porsche. Aerodynamic tricks include center-mounted front springs to aid front downforce, and active front splitter — the latter illegal in IMSA racing. Also illegal in IMSA racing are the car’s carbon ceramic brakes. For all its racing design, the cockpit is finished in premium materials including Miko suede, leather and carbon fiber. Displays are all-digital and front passengers sit in form-fitting Recaro seats. Only plan on bringing one passenger to the track, though. The GTR will delete its rear seat to save weight. “This is our company, we’re throwing down the gauntlet and saying, ‘Come and get it,’” said Farley. “We’re comfortable putting everybody else on notice. I’ll take track time in a Mustang GTD against any other auto boss in their best road car.” |
Ford makes first Québec Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. and two South Korean battery manufacturers are investing $980 million (1.2 billion Canadian dollars) to build a cathode manufacturing plant in Québec that will supply batteries for Ford electric vehicles. The investment by the Dearborn automaker, SK On Co Ltd and EcoPro BM Co. Ltd. is Ford's first in Québec and part of an effort to localize raw material processing. “Ford has been serving customers in Canada for 119 years," Bev Goodman, president and CEO of Ford of Canada, said in a statement, "longer than any other automaker, and we’re excited to invest in this new facility to create a vertically integrated, closed-loop battery manufacturing supply chain in North America designed to help make electric vehicles more accessible for millions of people over time." Production in Bécancour, a city on the St. Lawrence River that has attracted EV-sector investments, will begin in the first half of 2026 with a capacity to produce up to nearly 50,000 tons (45,000 metric tons) of cathode active materials, supporting production of up to 225,000 electric vehicles annually. The Canadian federal government and the province of Québec are supporting the project with $475 million (644 million Canadian dollars) in incentives with $238 million (322 million Canadian dollars) in conditional loans each. Construction has begun on the more than 3 million-square-foot (280,000 square-meter) site with a six-floor building. The plant will employ 345 jobs, including engineers, sales and service professionals, and co-op positions for students from local universities and colleges. EcoPro CAM Canada LP, which will be a joint venture among the three companies once the deal closes, will manufacture nickel, cobalt and manganese. EcoPro BM expands into North America with the plant and will oversee its daily operations. Its core shell gradient technology, according to a news release, can help yield better performance levels and improved EV range. The company also will conduct research and development to increase battery safety, performance, productivity and sustainability. In addition to this collaboration, General Motors Co. and POSCO Future M last year announced plans for a plant to produce cathode active material in Bécancour. Germany's BASF SE also is constructing a battery materials manufacturing site there. "Today, we are helping to further position Québec as a key hub in the electric vehicle supply chain, as we continue to build our battery ecosystem," François-Philippe Champagne, minister of innovation, science and industry, said in a statement. "This investment is good for the environment and for the economy, and it will ensure well-paying jobs for years to come.” |
'The clock is ticking:' UAW Jordyn Grzelewski With one month to go until the United Auto Workers' contracts with the Big Three expire, the union is preparing to escalate its fight to achieve its demands at the bargaining table. UAW President Shawn Fain, citing what the union described as a "slow pace of negotiations" with Stellantis NV, General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co., on Tuesday announced that the union will hold strike authorization votes next week ahead of the contracts' expiration at 11:59 p.m. Sept. 14. Strike authorizations are routine actions during labor negotiations that give union leaders the power to call a strike, but don't necessarily mean one will occur. Nearly 150,000 UAW members at the three companies will vote next week; such votes typically receive strong support. Results are expected Aug. 24. "Today marks 30 days until our contract expires, and yet we’re still bargaining over non-economics at all three companies. That’s unacceptable. The Big Three need to get serious, and they need to get down to business," Fain said during a Facebook livestream. “We are 30 days away and the clock is ticking." The UAW president said the union would not agree to extend the current contracts past expiration: "Sept. 14 is a deadline," he said. Meanwhile, Fain used the bargaining update to members to reiterate the union's argument that hefty profits generated by the Detroit automakers over the past decade mean they can afford to offer better wages and benefits to their workers. The UAW has pointed to $250 billion in North American profits the Detroit automakers generated from 2013 to 2022, as well as strong profits through the first half of this year. The union has proposed a 46% wage increase over four years, a 32-hour work week paid at 40 hours, retiree health care coverage to all, restoration of cost-of-living adjustments, expanding pensions, and more. Fain pushed back on responses from the automakers arguing that such increases would raise their labor costs to levels that would make them uncompetitive against foreign companies and electric-vehicle startups like Tesla. “GM’s comment about how our demands threaten their ability to do what is right for the long-term benefit of the team is a thinly-veiled threat to kill jobs because employees have the courage to demand what we are owed," Fain said. "In fact, GM’s led the way over the last 20 years by closing more plants than any other domestic automaker.” In a statement, GM spokesperson David Barnas said: "We've been working hard with the UAW every day to ensure we get this agreement right for all our stakeholders. We know that our U.S. economic impact supports more than 6 jobs for every job created by GM. We take that responsibility very seriously, and we continue to bargain in good faith each day to support our team members, our customers, the community and the business.” But as has been the case since negotiations started, Fain reserved his sharpest remarks for Stellantis executives. Last week, Mark Stewart, chief operating officer in North America for Stellantis, called the UAW's demands a "losing proposition" that could risk jobs and said the company is looking to reach an agreement "based on realism." Stewart's letter came days after Fain threw a copy of a July 27 offer from Stellantis into a trashcan during a Facebook livestream. Stellantis' counteroffer to the UAW emphasized what it described as high rates of absenteeism in plants. “COO Mark Stewart wrote a patronizing letter to our members, saying we need to tone down our demands in the name of ‘economic realism.’ We later learned from media reports that Stewart wrote that letter from his second multimillion-dollar mansion in Acapulco, Mexico, where he spent the last two weeks vacationing rather than bargaining," Fain said. "That’s the economic realism the companies want us to accept. They make billions in profits and millions in executive salaries, while the rest of us live paycheck-to-paycheck.” "The discussions between the Company and the UAW’s bargaining team continue to be constructive and collaborative with a focus on reaching a new agreement that balances the concerns of our 43,000 employees with our vision for the future – one that better positions the business to meet the challenges of the U.S. marketplace and secures the future for all of our employees, their families and our company," Stellantis spokesperson Jodi Tinson said in a statement. In a statement Tuesday, Ford spokesperson Kelli Felker said: “Ford is proud to build more vehicles in America and employ more UAW-represented hourly workers in America than any other automaker. We look forward to working with the UAW on creative solutions during this time when our dramatically changing industry needs a skilled and competitive workforce more than ever.” |
Ford Motor Co. reveals details By Gene Pereira Ford is investing $1.8 billion to transform the Oakville Assembly Complex into a Canadian hub of electric vehicle manufacturing. FORD MOTOR CO. IMAGE Oakville’s Ford Motor Co. released some of the details Monday (Aug. 14) behind its $1.8 billion dollar plan to turn the Oakville Assembly Complex into a high-volume hub of electric vehicle manufacturing in Canada. The newly renamed Oakville Electric Vehicle Complex will begin to retool in the second quarter of 2024 and start producing electric vehicles in 2025. Part of the transformation will also include a new 407,000 sq. on-site foot battery plant that will included parts from Ford’s operations in Kentucky. These components will be assembled by Oakville workers into battery packs and then installed into vehicles at the local plant. Ford is looking to reach a global production run of two million EVs annually by the end of 2026. The company says it will become the first full-line automaker to produce passenger EVs in Canada for the North American market. “Canada and the Oakville complex will play a vital role in our Ford+ transformation,” said Jim Farley, Ford president and CEO, in a statement. “It will be a modern, super efficient, vertically integrated site for battery and vehicle assembly. “I’m most excited for the world to see the incredible next-generation electric and fully digitally connected vehicles produced in Oakville.” To expand EV production, Ford is building new Greenfield sites and also transforming existing manufacturing sites like in Oakville and Cologne, Germany. “Ford’s commitment to invest in OAC retooling and upskilling signals a bright future for Canadian EV production and for Canadian auto sector employment,” said Lana Payne, Unifor National President. “The transformation of the Oakville plant is an important step towards a stronger industry and testament to the hard work, skills and dedication of our Unifor Oakville Assembly Complex members.” The current 487-acre Oakville site produces the Ford Edge and Lincoln Nautilus, but the automaker has yet to release what models it will build when the Oakville Electric Vehicle Complex opens. “Ford of Canada has been a leader in the country’s auto industry since it was founded 119 years ago, driven by hard-working, dedicated employees,” said Bev Goodman, president and CEO, Ford of Canada. “As the top-selling auto brand in Canada for 14 straight years, the successful transition to EV production in Oakville will help deliver stable Canadian employment with the opportunity to build the new skills and expertise to drive Ford and the industry forward.” |
Millions Of Canadians Could Story by Lisa Belmonte Millions Of Canadians Could Get Money From A LifeLabs Class Action & Here's Who Is Eligible© Provided by Narcity Canada There is a LifeLabs class action happening in Canada right now and millions of Canadians could receive money from the settlement. This lawsuit is in relation to a data breach that happened a few years back which compromised personal health information. KPMG Canada shared that if you were a LifeLabs customer on or before December 17, 2019, you belong to a class of people who could get cash benefits from a class action settlement with LifeLabs if it is approved by the court. The security breach was announced in 2019 after a cyberattack on a database of customer personal health information and then a proposed class action was started against LifeLabs Inc. and related LifeLabs companies. It's alleged that LifeLabs was negligent in the protection of customers' and patients' data. LifeLabs has denied all of the allegations. This class action includes about 8.6 million people whose personal information — like provincial health card numbers — was stolen. Also, just over 130,000 class members had their confidential test requisitions or test results taken by hackers in the data breach. A settlement has been negotiated, and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has certified the action but a hearing to consider approving the proposed settlement still needs to happen. The settlement approval hearing is scheduled to take place on October 25, 2023, so you won't receive money if the settlement is given the green light until after that date. KPMG Canada said you have the right to stay in the class action and participate in the settlement, stay in the class action but object to the settlement, or opt out of the class action and not receive any money from the settlement if approved. With this class action lawsuit against LifeLabs, all Canadian residents who were customers or patients and had their personal Information stored on computer systems in the control of LifeLabs that were compromised or accessed in the security breach are eligible to receive payment. That includes the subclass of all customers or patients of LifeLabs whose test requisitions or test results were accessed as a result of a security breach announced by LifeLabs on December 17, 2019. If the settlement is approved by the court, LifeLabs has agreed to pay compensation to class members who submit a valid claim form within the timeframe set out by the court. LifeLabs will pay a guaranteed amount of $4.9 million and up to an additional $4.9 million depending on the number of claims made if the settlement is approved. As part of this class action lawsuit in Canada, each class member who completes a valid claim form during the claim period will be eligible to receive $50. But it's possible to get up to a maximum of $150 from the settlement if it's approved. Class members could receive more or less than $50 depending on the number of claims filed, the legal fees and the disbursements approved by the court. |
Unifor says it will 'fight and Bianca Bharti Unifor national president Lana Payne says autoworkers are ready to “fight and strike” to have their demands met on higher wages and job security as the union kicked off labour negotiations with the Detroit Three automakers in Toronto. Representatives of Canada’s largest private sector union and Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV, met on Aug. 10 for the launch of the talks that come during a critical moment for the industry as it transitions away from gas-powered cars and with inflation concerns top of mind for employees. Payne handed company delegates a thick binder full of workers’ demands to review for the first time on Thursday. The union is focused on wage increases and job security in this round of bargaining, she said, and won’t hesitate to do battle to secure them. “The aftershock of the pandemic is still being felt, with parts shortages (and) supply bottlenecks resulting in significant downtime at some of our facilities (and) making life more precarious for many of our members,” Payne said at a press conference following individual meetings with each of the three automakers. “This is the moment we are in and no one should underestimate it.” The renegotiations come at a time of heightened organized labour activity in Canada, with unionized workers fighting for higher wages — and going on strike — after a run-up in inflation and higher interest rates over the past two years reduced purchasing power. The auto sector is also undergoing a transition to electric vehicles, requiring companies to retool factories and putting job security at risk. Payne said that makes this year’s round of bargaining especially crucial in ensuring workers are protected during the shift. Economics are one of the “tough” issues that will be discussed at the bargaining table, said Steven Majer, vice-president of human resources at Ford Canada, though he added all parties are going into negotiations with a “positive mindset.” Majer said inflation will weigh more heavily than usual on talks this year. “We typically include general wage increases, lump sum inflation protection bonuses, but what I think is really unique about this round of bargaining is the rate of inflation that nobody foresaw over the course of this past three-year window,” he said. Inflation will also play a factor in negotiating pensions benefits as some employees look to retire in the years ahead. “We have a workforce that’s looking forward to retirement at some point in the future and they want to make sure that the planned retirement benefits keep pace with what’s going on in the economy in years to come,” Majer said. Unionized Canadian autoworkers and the United Auto Workers (UAW) in the United States are simultaneously renegotiating contracts with the Detroit Three this year for the first time since the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. Unifor said it’s collaborating with UAW to ensure both organizations are aligned during the process. The Canadian union is seeking gains on wages and pensions for its 18,000 workers covered under collective agreements and wants commitments from the automakers around electric vehicle transition plans that will protect jobs. This week, UAW president Shawn Fain made a spectacle of angrily tossing Stellantis’s contract proposals in the trash bin after they fell short of the union’s demands. UAW, which represents 150,000 auto employees, is asking for 40-per-cent wage increases, but Payne said she would not reveal what rate Unifor is seeking to protect the bargaining process. Unifor typically opens up introductory talks with automakers for a few weeks before selecting one company, usually around Labour Day, on which to focus its bargaining efforts and then continuing one-by-one until all three deals are renegotiated. Payne said Unifor hasn’t selected which company it will target first, but is considering tapping Ford to lead bargaining since the two have a “good historical working relationship” and the company has demonstrated a “willingness to dialogue.” |
Autoworkers prepared to Kathleen Saylors Unifor National president Lana Payne had strong words for the Detroit Three automakers Thursday afternoon as talks officially opened to negotiate a new collective agreement for workers. "I made it very clear to the companies today that our members' expectations are very high," Payne told reporters at a press conference after delivering open offers to Ford, Stellantis and General Motors in Toronto. "Workers have shown time and time again they are prepared to fight and to strike if necessary to have their demands met. "This is the moment we are in and no one, no one should underestimate it." The union kicked off bargaining with the three companies today with key priorities: pensions, wages, transition security and securing investments. Payne said it was the first time in years the union entered bargaining "without storm clouds hanging over our plants." But, she added, the "once-in-a-century" transition to EVs was causing anxiety among members for their job security, noting as many as a third of Unifor workers could be vulnerable in the move to electric vehicles. Ford a likely target as Unifor seeks three-year agreement Other key issues in bargaining include the recruitment challenges for skilled trades workers, mental health supports, health and safety and contract disparities that exist for workers before and after the 2012 negotiations. The company will be seeking a three year agreement, Payne said. And while the target won't formally be announced until further along in the bargaining process — traditionally around Labour Day — Payne said the union is likely to choose Ford Motor Company. Payne said that's because Ford has been "forthcoming" and willing to work with Unifor in the EV transition process. Ford was the union's target in 2020. Lana Payne, national president for Unifor and Steve Majer, vice president of Ford's human resources, take part in a photo opportunity as Unifor begins formal contract talks with Detroit automakers Ford, General Motors and Stellantis in Toronto on Thursday, August 10, 2023. (The Canadian Press) "I'm stating this only to let you know and our members know where my head is at right now," Payne said. "Of course there is still plenty of time and our thought process might change." In its statement, Ford said it had "important work to do together [with Unifor] as we create a blueprint for the Canadian automotive industry." "We approach the process with a common goal – a vibrant and sustainable future for our employees, our customers, and our communities. Both parties bring an incredible amount of knowledge, creativity, and respect to the table, and we are ready and willing to work together to find innovative solutions." The union will be holding its customary strike votes on Aug. 26 and 27, Payne said, "in the hopes members will give us the mandate we need to take strike action if necessary." As for the question of what kind of wage increases the union will be seeking, Payne said they would be "substantial" but said details would be kept to the bargaining process. Retirees say pensions are top of mind during negotiations At a rally downtown Thursday morning, auto retirees were asking for pension improvements they say are long overdue as inflation climbs and companies make huge profits. Bob Nickerson is a retired labour leader, and former national secretary-treasurer of the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW). "Retirees were, in the early days, fighting for pensions in the plant, the wages and the benefits," said Bob Nickerson, former national secretary-treasurer of the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW). "You guys did all the work for the guys coming behind us … and we took care of the people coming up behind us. We're taking care of ourselves." UAW and Unifor negotiations separate, Payne says Payne drew a contrast to the tactics of the United Auto Workers and her counterpart in the United States, Shawn Fain, who this week literally threw an offer from Stellantis in the trash and has said openly the union will be seeking a whopping 46 per cent wage increase. "For us we have our own job to do, our different collective agreements. We have different things we want to achieve," Payne said, adding that some priorities are similar. "And we wish them well, we want them to do well by their members the same way I'm sure they wish us well here in Canada." Union leadership from both sides of the border met in Windsor last week for a "summit" ahead of the start of bargaining. Employer cites investments at beginning of bargaining The Detroit Three automakers released statements signalling the opening of negotiations. General Motors said their negotiations will cover about 4,200 workers in Oshawa, St. Catharines and Woodstock. "We look forward to working with our Unifor partners to build a competitive future that also recognizes our employees' contributions to our shared success," the company said. In its statement, Stellantis said it had invested more than $8.6 billion in Canada in the last 18 months that would create more than 3,000 jobs. "Collectively, our focus will be on negotiating an agreement that will ensure our future competitiveness in today's rapidly changing global market, with good benefits and wage increases that reward the contributions of our represented workforce now and for generations to come," the statement said. "During negotiations, both parties must continue to work together and find creative solutions that meet the needs of today's workforce while maintaining efficient and productive workplaces." What you need to know as bargaining begins The are more than 19,600 Unifor members unionized at the Detroit Three across Canada. The largest share of those members work for Stellantis, both at the Windsor Assembly plant, which has 4,500 members and at the Brampton Assembly plant with 3,200 members, according to Unifor figures. Bargaining between the Big 3 and the United Auto Workers is off to a testy start. With separate negotiations set to begin for Canadian employees set to kick off today, we talk with an industry analyst about whether there's likely to be an easier path to a new contract here. Unifor's Auto Council, comprised of union leadership from different companies and workplaces, will spearhead negotiations from the union's side. The companies engage in what's known as pattern bargaining: essentially, with a few small exceptions, the deal that one company reaches will be replicated by the other two. "Once we get the pattern set by that by that company then the others need to fall in line," said Unifor Local 444 president Dave Cassidy. For the first time since 1999 (excluding the 2008-09 financial crisis), both Unifor and the United Auto Workers (UAW) will be negotiating with the Detroit Three at the same time. A worker walks towards the gate of the Windsor Assembly Plant on Thursday, Aug. 10, 2023. Bargaining with the Detroit Three automakers got underway on Thursday. (Dax Melmer/CBC) These are separate negotiations — the UAW and the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW, which later became Unifor) parted ways in the 1980s, and have bargained separately ever since. However, Unifor and UAW representatives met as recently as last week in Windsor to advance "each other's' interests throughout the bargaining process", according to a press release. One auto expert said a one example of a difference between UAW and Unifor bargaining is that the UAW seeks performance bonuses, which are not part of Unifor's strategy. Contracts for Unifor members at the Detroit Three expire on September 18 at 11:59 p.m. |
Unifor seeking investments Taylor Campbell Investments in Windsor’s Ford engine plant were among the numerous demands Unifor national president Lana Payne had for the Detroit Three automakers as contract talks kicked off Thursday. During a media conference in Toronto that afternoon, Payne listed investments in Canada as one of the union’s four “core priorities” going into negotiations with Ford, Stellantis, and General Motors. The other key issues were pensions, wages, and support for the transition to electric vehicles. “Obviously there are more investments that can be made around the EV transition we’re looking at,” Payne said. “We have a wonderful engine plant here in Windsor and we’d love to see a map for what else we can add to that facility going forward.” In three consecutive meetings with the companies to open contract talks earlier on Thursday, Payne said she “made it very clear” that the union member expectations are “very high” amid the rising cost of living and a “stunning and staggering” financial performance by the Detroit Three. “Workers have shown time and time again that they are prepared to fight and to strike if necessary to have their demands met,” she said. “This is the moment we are in and no one should underestimate it.” Payne called the last three years a “very challenging period,” and said her members are still feeling the aftershock of the COVID-19 pandemic. Parts shortages and supply bottlenecks have resulted in “significant” downtown at some facilities, “making life more precarious for many of our members.” Unifor is seeking improvements to pensions and retirement security, and “significant” wage increases. Payne declined to share specifics about wage demands and said she was “leaving that for the bargaining table.” While meeting with the companies, she said, she made “special mention” of wages for skilled trades workers to resolve a “chronic recruitment and retention challenge.” The “excitement” among workers around building electric vehicles comes with “uncertainty and anxiety,” she said, calling for job protections during retooling periods. “We are insisting that every EV and EV-related job is a good union job with the same rights and employment terms as auto workers enjoy today,” Payne said. In a Facebook post, the Unifor Local 444 bargaining team said it met with Unifor’s auto council on Wednesday, “going over battle plans” in anticipation of bargaining talks. Payne was present. Sitting at the table during bargaining talks in Toronto on a new three-year contract covering close to 20,000 autoworkers is a heavy Windsor union leader presence. Local 200 president John D’Agnolo is the Ford master bargaining chair, and Local 444 secretary-treasurer James Stewart is the Stellantis master bargaining chair. Payne said she expects “intensive negotiations” in the following weeks. On Aug. 26 and 27, the union will hold customary strike votes. The collective agreements expire on Sept. 18 at 11:59 p.m. Unifor has not yet decided which company it will select as its first “target” to secure a deal, Payne said. However, she said the union is “seriously considering setting the pattern” with Ford Motor Company. That’s because Ford has been “forthcoming” about its plans and the most “transparent” during quarterly review business meetings. “They’ve also demonstrated, quite frankly, a willingness to dialogue, and in fact, they have publicly signalled a desire to draft a blueprint for the future transition through bargaining with Unifor,” Payne said of Ford. In a written statement Thursday, Stellantis said its focus “will be on negotiating an agreement that will ensure our future competitiveness in today’s rapidly changing global market, with good benefits and wage increases that reward the contributions of our represented workforce now and for generations to come. “This is a significant time in the industry as we make the transition to electrification,” the statement continued, “and we must approach negotiations with a vision for the future.” Stellantis, the company said, has announced investments of more than $8.6 billion in Canada over the last 18 months, with more than 3,000 new jobs and an anticipated return of the third shift at its Windsor and Brampton assembly plants. “During negotiations, both parties must continue to work together and find creative solutions that meet the needs of today’s workforce while maintaining efficient and productive workplaces,” Stellantis said. |
Ford posts sales gain in July Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose 5.9% year-over-year in July, according to figures released Wednesday. The Dearborn automaker sold 173,639 vehicles last month. More than 155,000 of those were internal combustion engine vehicles, sales of which were up 5.7%. Sales of hybrid vehicles were up 31.6% to just under 11,500, while sales of battery-electric vehicles were down 18.1% to 6,280. The results underperformed the industry as a whole, which Cox Automotive estimated saw an increase of more than 15% over year-ago levels, to nearly 1.3 million vehicles. "Vastly increased inventory levels and a general improvement in consumer sentiment are helping fuel stronger sales in the U.S.," Cox analysts wrote in a note Wednesday. "Recovering fleet business — notably with rental and government buyers — was also a key driver of volume this month, as it has been through the first half of 2023." New-vehicle inventory levels were up approximately 75% year-over-year in early July, according to Cox. Analysts estimate the seasonally adjusted annual rate of sales came in close to 15.7 million in July, up from 13.3 million a year ago. The large industry gains were primarily driven by performances from brands including Hyundai and Kia, according to Cox. America Honda's sales were up nearly 57% from a year ago. Ford, meanwhile, has pointed to downtime at two of its EV plants in recent months to explain a dip in EV sales, as the automaker works to expand production capacity. On Tuesday, the company said it had restarted production at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, where the electric F-150 Lightning is assembled. The plant was down for six weeks to expand and retool to support a tripling of production capacity; executives said they expect Lightning sales to ramp up this fall and that the plant remains on track to hit an annual production rate of 150,000 Lightning trucks by the end of the third quarter. Ford sold 1,552 Lightning trucks in July, down 28.6% from a year ago. In July, Ford's SUV sales were down 2% while trucks were up 15.2%. Sales were up for the Bronco Sport, Escape, Bronco, Edge, F-Series, Ranger, Maverick, E-Series and Transit. They were down for Mustang Mach-E, Explorer, Expedition, Transit Connect, heavy trucks and Mustang. F-Series, the best-selling truck line in the United States and Ford's flagship product, notched 68,536 sales in July, up 8.2% from July 2022. The Bronco family of vehicles, which includes the Bronco and Bronco Sport, saw sales rise 41% in July. And sales of the newly redesigned Ford Escape were up 26%. Lincoln brand sales fell 4.4% year-over-year. Year-to-date, Ford's sales are up 9.4% from the first seven months of 2022. |
UAW president Shawn Breana Noble United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain threw a printed contract proposal from the maker of Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles into the trash Tuesday, accusing the company of reneging on its commitment not to seek a "concessionary agreement" amid national contract talks. Fain in a Facebook livestream discussed points of Stellantis NV's offer to the union that were outlined in a flier circulating on social media this week. The proposal, obtained by The Detroit News, is dated July 27 and includes adding a new employee classification with an alternate, flexible schedule; tying wage increases, profit sharing and supplemental unemployment benefits to absenteeism; increasing employee contribution to health-care and prescription coverage; eliminating the cap on supplemental workers and allowing the company to make bargaining changes in response to the move to electrification without rank-and-file ratification. "Stellantis' proposals are a slap in the face," Fain said. "They're an insult to our members' hard work over the last four years. As I said earlier, our members have worked their a---- off in the best of times and the worst of times, to produce incredible value for this company. During COVID, UAW members were deemed essential. They risked their lives, and some gave up their lives to keep the lines running. So rather than honoring the sacrifices made by the employees, management chooses to spit in our faces." Fain during the livestream picked up his office trash can and threw the proposal into the garbage. "I'll tell you what I want to do with their proposal," he said. "I'm going to file it in its proper place, because that's where it belongs: the trash, because that's what it is." The automaker's proposal as explained by Fain stands distinct from the "members' demands" from the UAW outlined last week. The union's proposals include eliminating wage tiers for full-time employees, expanding profit sharing to supplemental employees, providing pensions and retirement health-care coverage for all workers, reducing the work week to 32 hours while paying workers for 40, and granting a 46% wage hike over four years. Estimates in total say the proposal could increase labor costs to more than $100 per hour per worker at the Detroit Three automakers, roughly double labor costs at foreign automakers assembling vehicles in the United States. In response to the UAW's demands last week, Stellantis spokeswoman Jodi Tinson had said in a statement that the automaker was reviewing the numbers to understand what they would mean for the company and its 43,000 represented employees. "We have been clear from the start that we are not seeking a concessionary agreement," she said in the statement. "As we have done for more than 70 years, we will work constructively and collaboratively with the UAW to find solutions that will result in a contract that is competitive in the global market, responsibly addresses employee concerns and meets the needs of our customers." A request for comment was sent to Stellantis on Tuesday concerning the UAW's fliers, Fain's livestream and the written proposal obtained by The News. The written proposal doesn't detail potential wage increase amounts or how much pay the new tier of flexible-schedule employees would receive, but it emphasizes the need to address high rates of unplanned absenteeism in U.S. plants. Planned and unplanned absenteeism, including tardiness, was approximately 23% in 2022, according to the written proposal, which suggests in 2021 and 2022, more than 16,700 vehicles weren't built because of absenteeism. The estimate included in the write-up states that was $217 million in lost revenue. Stellantis also suggests increasing the number of pay periods required for vacation entitlements. It seeks to eliminate the cap on use of lower-paid supplemental workers and to allow the use of temporarily laid-off workers at other plants. It includes a new quarterly "reward" for 100% shift attendance, as well. Stellantis seeks to expand its ability to use overtime on weekdays and weekends for emergencies, critical plant status, high rates of absenteeism and to make up volume. It also seeks to bank hours to balance the use of periods when overtime is used and during periods of decreased production levels. Stellantis' health-care costs, according to the written proposal, are expected to increase by $613 million to $1.1 billion by 2027. To alleviate that, the automaker suggests employee cost sharing possibly through premiums, copays, deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums. It would incentivize participation in its wellness program and add a surcharge for spouses of employees who don't use their own employer's health insurance. Coverage of certain drugs, such as for erectile dysfunction, would be limited. The company also would enroll in the Blue Elect Plus network. The company suggests some changes to how it contributes to retirement plans, including trading its contribution to a matching plan. Additionally, lump sum payments for employees would be conditioned on the ratification of their local contract agreement. The proposal doesn't mention the idled Jeep Cherokee plant in Belvidere, Illinois, but it requests that the moratorium on closing and selling a plant be deleted. It also would eliminate the relocation allowance plan. Fain said Stellantis can handle the UAW's proposals, which he last week described as "audacious and ambitious." Stellantis posted a record $15.2 billion in adjusted operating income in North America in 2022 and $8.88 billion in the first half of 2023. For 2022, Stellantis workers received $14,760 in profit sharing, the most of the Detroit Three's UAW-represented employees, though supplemental workers aren't eligible to receive the checks. Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares, however, has emphasized the need for the company to stay competitive since electric vehicles represent 40% more in cost to produce than their internal combustion engine counterparts. Fain criticized Tavares' compensation. His total remuneration package in 2022 was $24.8 million, a 22% increase year-over-year, though that includes stock grants not yet vested and that will depend on the automaker's continued performance. The total was 365 times mores than the average Stellantis employee's compensation. Tavares' "actual compensation" consisting of his salary, bonus, vested stock awards and pension contribution was $15.8 million, a 13% decrease from 2021. Stellantis is the company created in 2021 from Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and French rival Groupe PSA. In 2019, FCA employees represented by the UAW ratified a four-year agreement that provided 3% wage increases in two of the years and 4% lump-sum bonuses in the other two, an improved profit-sharing formula and ratification bonuses of $9,000 for full-time employees and $3,500 for supplemental workers. Fain's livestream is reflective of the "more militant" tone the union has taken since the new administration took over in March, said Marick Masters, a business professor at Wayne State University. "The negotiations are taking place increasingly in the public domain," he said. "The union is of the mindset that they will call out the company when it believes it has misrepresented the situation. "It doesn’t necessarily signal anything more than that. I wouldn’t say it means they are going to target Stellantis because of this." This year's demands from the UAW call for an immediate 20% wage raise upon ratification and a 5% raise every September from 2024 through 2027. The UAW also is seeking the reintroduction of a cost-of-living adjustment. "My message," Fain said, "to Stellantis is very simple: Quit with the games, stop with the lies and start bargaining an agreement that actually shows value to the sacrifices made by our members." All three contracts with the Detroit automakers are set to expire on Sept. 14, and Fain said the strike fund is in "healthy" shape. "If things don't pick up, the Big Three companies don't start getting serious and getting down to business and resolving the membership's demands, then, come September 14th, we're gonna have to see what happens, but I don't think they're gonna be happy with it." |
UAW demands 46% pay Breana Noble Kalea Hall The United Auto Workers is seeking a 46% wage increase over four years as a part of its negotiations with the Detroit Three automakers, according to a page of the union's written demands. The proposal would be the largest pay increase in recent memory. The proposal from the Detroit-based union that represents approximately 150,000 workers making Chevrolets, Fords, Jeeps and more calls for a 20% general wage increase upon ratification of a new contract "to offset severe impact of inflation" over the past few years, according to the write-up obtained by The Detroit News. After that, the union demands a 5% wage increase every September through the life of the agreement through 2027. The UAW's top wage is $32.32 per hour after two 3% wage increases since 2019. The union's proposal would bring that to $47.14, nearing the $49 per hour average top rate recently achieved in a tentative agreement by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters with United Parcel Service Inc. Meanwhile, pay would be well above estimated averages of wages for workers at nonunion competitors manufacturing in the United States. UAW President Shawn Fain on Tuesday shared an overview of the "members' demands" that called for "double-digit" wage increases, a cost-of-living allowance, pensions for all, a jobs bank-like Working Families Protection Program and more paid time off. Fain also suggested the union would fight for a 32-hour work week. "Big Three CEOs saw their pay spike 40% on average over the last four years," Fain said on Tuesday during a Facebook livestream. "We know our members are worth the same and more." He had picked out GM CEO Mary Barra specifically, who last year received nearly $29 million in total compensation that includes benefits, which is up roughly 34% from what she received in 2019, though her base salary remains the same at $2.1 million. General Motors Co. posted a statement on its negotiations website on Thursday, saying it expects to increase wages of its workers, but that the UAW's full proposal risks long-term success. "The breadth and scope of the Presidential Demands, at face value, would threaten our ability to do what’s right for the long-term benefit of the team. A fair agreement rewards our employees and also enables GM to maintain our momentum now and into the future," it reads. "We think it’s important to protect U.S. manufacturing and jobs in an industry that is dominated by non-unionized competition." Kelli Felker, spokeswoman for Ford Motor Co., which employs the most UAW members of the Detroit Three, said in a statement that the company will work with the UAW "on creative solutions during this time when our dramatically changing industry needs a skilled and competitive workforce more than ever." Stellantis NV earlier this week said it still was evaluating the demands and reiterated it wasn't looking for a "concessionary agreement." Automakers typically prefer lump-sum bonuses that don't build on top of each other over the years. In the 2019 contract, they committed to 4% bonuses in the other two years when wage increases weren't provided. Other proposals specified on the page seen by The Detroit News are wrapping in current employees without pensions into the existing pension program with credit from their hiring seniority date; expanding profit-sharing bonuses to all represented workers, including temporary employees; COLA for all represented workers; and expanding supplemental unemployment benefits on the same basis to all workers without limitation. Marick Masters, a business professor at Wayne State University, echoed Fain’s remarks earlier in the week, calling the wage proposal “audacious,” but “probably out of line with what the conventional expectations were.” “The UAW has embarked on an ambitious campaign to reclaim what they believe is lost ground and to reinstate prior economic conditions that were considered during the Great Recession and bankruptcy era,” he said. “And this is a part of their new bargain, new philosophy toward a just and fair transition to electrification, and that requires higher wages, more job security and the reinstatement of certain benefits that were made in the past. “This is a new reality, and the question is whether in this new reality they can find a path for a bold agenda of the UAW that enables the companies to remain competitive. That is an extremely difficult task.” |
‘Revenge of the wage earner’: As the strike continues, labour experts said workers are at a tipping point, with retailers reporting record profits while real wages remain stagnant and jobs are precarious. By Megan Ogilvie Health Reporter, Santiago Arias Orozco Staff Reporter As the strike by Metro grocery workers continued for a second day, experts said the job action is part of a larger trend of lower-wage earners pushing back against employers for better pay in industries that have in recent years seen massive gains in profits. On Saturday, more than 3,700 front-line workers walked off the job, hitting the picket lines in front of 27 Metro stores across the GTA after voting against a tentative agreement brought forward by their union. The tentative deal between Unifor Local 414 and Metro Inc. had included gains for employees, but workers voted against the agreement, saying they deserve more from the company. “This is the revenge of the wage earner,” David Macdonald, senior economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, told the Star on Sunday. “The first couple years of big increases in prices flowed into corporate profits, and workers were behind the 8-ball over that entire period. “Now they are trying to claw back their lost real wages because prices are so much higher than they were in 2021.” On Sunday, Lana Payne, Unifor’s national president, told the Star that workers have reached a tipping point with grocery retailers reporting record profits while staff see stagnating salaries and precarious benefits at a time of soaring inflation. Unifor, the country’s largest private-sector union, also represents workers at the Star. “Grocery retailers are creating the conditions for workers to say enough is enough,” she said. “We deserve a share of this pie. We deserve to have decent work. We deserve to have decent pay.” While not all industries that employ lower-wage workers have benefited from the “inflationary period of the pandemic,” the grocery industry has profited from higher prices, said Macdonald, noting the food and beverage industry has seen margins roughly double from what they were before COVID-19. He said Canada’s tight labour market gives workers more confidence to fight for higher wages through collective action because they know they are harder to replace. “Workers have more power than they would have had a couple years ago,” he said. “One of the ways you utilize that power is to try for higher wages. We’re seeing that as an example here.” Grocery chains across the country saw their profits rise during the pandemic, and workers say they deserve a fair share after working on the front lines. In the second quarter of this year, Metro earned $218.8 million, a 10 per cent rise from the same period a year prior. Metro also saw its sales grow to $4.55 billion in the quarter, a 6.6 per cent rise year over year. Payne said Metro staff are standing up for better work conditions at their 27 stores — not just for themselves, but for the grocery sector nationwide. She noted Metro is the first major grocery retailer to negotiate with Unifor during this bargaining cycle, setting a benchmark for other upcoming negotiations. Metro workers are looking for “better wage standards,” she said, as well as improvements in a pension plan and securing a larger quota of full-time employment contracts. “This strike gives us an opportunity to turn the trends in the sector to growth out of precarity in employment, to build better jobs across stores,” said Payne, calling it a “defining moment for grocery store workers in Canada.” The strike by full- and part-time workers at 27 Metro stores in Toronto, Brampton, Brantford, Milton, Mississauga, Newmarket, Oakville and Orangeville is the largest Unifor strike to date. Workers walked off the job shortly after midnight on Friday after rejecting a tentative collective agreement in a series of regional votes. On Saturday, Metro Ontario Inc. said the grocery retailer is “extremely disappointed” with the decision of its unionized employees, adding a “fair and equitable agreement” was struck over the past weeks, meeting the needs of front-line workers while securing the company’s competitiveness. Metro said it “worked constructively with the union and the employees’ bargaining committee” and that the agreement provided “significant increases for our employees over the four years of the collective agreement in addition to improved pension and benefits.” The company said the agreement built on “working conditions that are already among the highest in the industry which were negotiated with this union.” Barry Eidlin, an associate professor of sociology at McGill University and an expert on labour and social movements, said it’s notable that Metro workers rejected a tentative collective agreement brought forward by its union leaders. He points to the rejection as a sign that the current job action is “bottom-up, worker-led organizing,” part of a wider trend in the labour movement. Recent job actions in various professions across Canada and the United States show workers are “starting to fight back” on a range of issues, including higher wages, greater job security, protection from automation and health and safety risks, Eidlin said. Along with Metro workers, Eidlin points to the strike action at B.C. ports and, in the U.S., Hollywood actors and writers on the picket lines, as well as the recent labour fight at United Parcel Service (UPS). “There’s a more militant movement amongst workers that we’re starting to see,” said Eidlin. In a number of industries, Canadian workers have seen seeing hourly wage gains below the rate of inflation, meaning “they were taking real pay cuts month after month for two years,” Macdonald said. “For the last five months, they’ve been above the rate of inflation when it comes to hourly wage gains. They are clawing their way back from the impact that inflation has had on their wages.” Macdonald said the trend of workers fighting for higher wages, better job conditions and greater security will continue. “It’s not just that they’re treading water, right? They’ve been pushed under, and they’re trying to get back to the surface,” he said. “Workers realize that employers are making more, that their wages aren’t keeping pace with costs, and so they are looking to increase those wages, trying to get back to even with respect to where they stood in 2019.” |
Ford to Seek Flexible EV Keith Naughton, Bloomberg News (Bloomberg) -- Ford Motor Co. will ask the United Auto Workers union for flexibility to reduce electric-vehicle production in case the US market for battery-powered cars lags behind expectations. Negotiations open Friday for a new four-year contract for Ford’s more than 57,000 US hourly workers. And talks are expected to be contentious as the union seeks pay raises, a restoration of cost-of-living increases and job guarantees while the industry shifts to less labor intensive electric-vehicle production. New UAW President Shawn Fain has said he is going to “war” against the Detroit automakers and accused them of engaging in a “race to the bottom” in the EV transition with factories that will employ fewer workers earning lower wages. This week, Fain eschewed the ceremonial handshake-across-the-bargaining-table with CEOs that has marked the opening of auto contract talks for decades, saying he’ll do so “when they come to the table with a deal.” Ford will seek leeway in its $50 billion plan to boost EV production 15-fold to 2 million models a year by the end of 2026. The company wants the ability to move workers to factories building the most in-demand models, whether they’re powered by electricity or traditional internal combustion, according to Ford officials who requested anonymity discussing internal matters. The current union contract restricts Ford’s ability to flex production, they said. Ford has reason for caution. The US has been the slowest major market to adopt EVs, lagging behind China and Europe. Electric-vehicle sales growth in the world’s biggest economy slowed to just under 50% in the first half of the year, down from 71% during the same period in 2022, as inventories of battery-powered models ballooned. Ford’s US EV sales fell 2.8% during the second quarter as it overhauled a Mexican factory to boost output of the Mustang Mach-E, while sales of the F-150 Lightning plug-in pickup grew just 4%. Ford is hoping to convince the union to give it more flexibility by noting that it employs as many as 14,000 more US hourly workers than either General Motors Co. or Stellantis NV, parent company of Chrysler and Jeep. Having the biggest US hourly workforce costs Ford an extra $1 billion a year compared to its domestic competitors, the officials said. Ford’s labor costs, including wages and benefits, are $64 an hour, compared to $55 an hour at the non-union assembly plants of international automakers such as Toyota Motor Corp. That creates a labor cost gap of $900 million with the international automakers, the people said. Labor costs at Tesla Inc. are even lower at $45-to-$50-an-hour. Ford also plans to pledge to bring more EV manufacturing in-house to help offset the lower labor requirements, the people said. Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley has said controlling more elements of EV and battery production will give Ford a competitive advantage. Last month, Farley penned a Detroit Free Press opinion piece defending Ford’s hourly compensation, which he wrote comes to $112,000 in annual pay and benefits. That elicited a sharp response from UAW Vice President Chuck Browning, who accused Farley of misleading the public and “utilizing old, musty and ineffective tactics.” Farley is under pressure to reverse $3 billion in projected EV losses this year and achieve an ambitious goal of generating an 8% return, before interest and taxes, on battery-powered models by the end of 2026. Wall Street is skeptical that can be accomplished while boosting EV production to a level one analyst called “crazy high.” Keeping costs in check is key to Farley’s ambitions. Since last summer when Farley said, “we absolutely have too many people,” Ford has cut thousands of salaried workers in the US and Europe. New Factories Meanwhile, the automaker also is adding thousands of production jobs at new battery factories in Tennessee, Kentucky and Michigan. But it is not yet clear if those new workers will be represented by a union or how much they will earn. Ford’s highest paid production worker now makes $32 an hour, which the company says exceeds the pay of 90% of factory workers in America. The UAW blasted Ford for taking a $9.2 billion US government loan to help finance three battery factories it’s building with South Korea’s SK On in Kentucky and Tennessee, calling it a “massive” handout to a venture creating “low-road jobs.” The contract covering Ford’s hourly workers expires in mid-September. |
Jerry Dias commentary: For Promises made but not kept during collective bargaining will be analyzed and criticized by those who are currently your biggest cheerleaders Jerry Dias The automotive industry has long been central to a strong North American middle class. That positioning is about to face a major test as the Detroit Three begin negotiations with the UAW in the U.S. and Unifor in Canada. Negotiations will be led by a variety of personalities — some with little or no bargaining experience and others who will strive to fix decades of inequity in one shot. These negotiations will show the true colours of union leaders. Both the UAW and Unifor have new leadership, with the UAW electing Shawn Fain as president in March and Unifor electing Lana Payne as president in August 2022. Fain was elected as a member of the UAW Members United reform group and has promised a more militant approach to negotiations, definitively declaring that he will end two-tier wages, reintroduce cost of living adjustments, win significant increases for current retirees and eliminate alternative work schedules. Two-tier wages were first bargained by the UAW with Delphi in 2003. Wages and benefits were cut by US$10 an hour, amounting to concessions of 30 to 40 per cent. This trend flowed through the auto parts industry and quickly made its way into Detroit Three bargaining on both sides of the border. The cancer that was caused still exists today. Are we entering an opportunity to correct this wrong or simply listening to populist sloganeering from a newly elected union president? PROMISES MADE, PROMISES KEPT? Populist slogans are nothing new and know no political affiliation, but if you're going to talk that way, you better deliver. Promises made but not kept during collective bargaining will be analyzed and criticized by those who are currently your biggest cheerleaders. While we wait to see how the negotiations unfold and whether the likely strike materializes, here's what I can tell you from experience:
The most seasoned negotiator for the UAW is Chuck Browning, the current vice-president originally from the shop floor at Ford Motor Co. For Unifor, Shane Wark, the assistant to the president and originally from Ford, will be heavily relied on as the senior officer with the most collective bargaining experience and knowledge of the industry. The UAW has staff department heads who will lead bargaining with the respective companies. Unifor has rank-and-file leaders to head up bargaining with their employers with energy and determination that can only be attained through shop floor and bargaining experience.
The Detroit Three have fewer tools in their arsenal than they did in 2003 or even when they last negotiated a deal following a 40-day strike in 2019. Previously, companies used contract negotiations to whipsaw U.S. workers against Canadian workers. There was also always the thinly veiled threat of moving auto jobs to Mexico, where labour standards were much looser. The USMCA began to fix this mess. I was honoured to be a part of the Canadian labour negotiation team and was locked in Ottawa for the critical last 72 hours as the deal was finalized. During those last three days, the sticking point, and the issue I would not back down on, was automotive. When I buried my feet in cement, I purposefully left myself no wiggle room. I am proud that now, under the new free trade agreement, 40 to 45 per cent of auto parts must be made by workers earning at least US$16 an hour, and 75 per cent of the content must be North American, up from 62.5 per cent. These provisions will save Canadian and American jobs and rob the Detroit Three of one of the most powerful levers they had. WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE So, what does success look like heading into the upcoming negotiations? To me, it looks like the elimination of the two-tiered wage system, the reintroduction of cost-of-living adjustments, significant pension increases for current retirees, and the elimination of alternative work schedules. While this might seem like a lot to ask for, I want to remind readers of two things. First, auto workers deserve it. Second, the Detroit Three can afford it. GM profited almost US$10 billion in 2022 and Stellantis' profits jumped 26 per cent to a staggering US$18 billion. Profits for all of the Detroit Three remained strong through the first six months of 2023 — GM, Ford and Stellantis generated a combined US$20.6 billion in net income over the period, as Automotive News reported here. Shrewd negotiators will often manage expectations, but in this case wiggle room cannot be accepted. In 2020, bargaining in Canada included the reopening of the GM plant in Oshawa and new electric vehicle production for Ford in Oakville to avoid a complete closure. These were hills to die on. The fact is that these companies can afford to properly compensate workers and treat them with respect; now all that's left to do is go out and fight for it. And that is a hill worth dying on. Jerry Dias is the retired president of Unifor, the largest private-sector union in Canada. |
Wave of strikes in Canada could By Uday Rana & Anne Gaviola While a new tentative deal may have been reached between the two sides involved in a labour dispute impacting thousands of B.C. port workers, experts say Canada may not have seen the last of strikes this year. From the B.C. port strike to the recent Greater Toronto Area Metro workers’ strike to the writers’ strike in the U.S., rising costs of living, high corporate profits and dissatisfaction among workers may all be contributing to collective action across sectors. Simon Black, associate professor of labour studies at Brock University, said that while these present-day examples may not be at the same level as the strike waves of the 1970s and the late 1940s, all signs point towards large-scale dissatisfaction. “Workers have seen their real wages, their purchasing power, eroding a great deal under this inflationary period. And yet, large corporations have made record gains, while working class households have struggled. I think there’s good evidence that the corporate profits and not workers’ wages have contributed disproportionately to inflation,” Black said. Moshe Lander, economics professor at Concordia University, said the latest strike waves are driven by a desire to recover some of the lost purchasing power. “You’re having, essentially, a showdown that’s dealing with how we recover the lost money or the redistribution of that money during high inflation.” For 13 days this month beginning July 1, some 7,400 port workers at 30 ports in B.C. walked off the job, stalling billions worth of cargo from moving in or out at some of Canada’s busiest terminals. A tentative deal was reached late Sunday night, which labour minister Seamus O’Regan said would mean “long-term stability”. “We know sometimes labour negotiations can be extremely difficult, but every step of the way, Minister O’Regan has been there to encourage people at the table to make sure that we’re getting towards a solution,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said while speaking to reporters on Monday. “And yes, there have been concerns and worries about how things are unfolding over the past days, but we now have a situation where there is another offer, there is another potential deal on the table, and we’re, as always, hopeful that that negotiation at the bargaining table continues to be at the centre of what everyone needs to continue to do.” On Friday, Metro grocery stores across the Greater Toronto Area shut down as thousands of grocery store employees went on strike. Unifor, the largest private-sector union, says some 3,700 front-line store employees walked off the job just after midnight. It says members of Local 414 rejected a tentative labour deal reached last week, but provided few other details. In a statement on Friday, Metro said it was “extremely disappointed that its unionized employees at 27 Metro locations across the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) rejected the agreement reached last week and decided to go on strike effective July 29, even though the union bargaining committee unanimously recommended the agreement to its members.” This recent wave of strikes come as Canadian workers are feeling the pinch of higher costs. A PwC survey released on Monday found 42 per cent of Canadian workers say that while their household can pay its bills, they have nothing left over for savings. Another 14 per cent say their household struggles to pay its bills. “Work pressures are also acute, with only 22% saying their workload was often or usually manageable in the last 12 months. Many of these issues have been ongoing for some time, but an additional force of disruption emerged this year with the very rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence,” the report said. In addition to cost of living concerns, Lander said the Screen Actors Guild strike in the United States is an illustration of how anxieties around the use of artificial intelligence could also be contributing to labour action. Black said workers’ strike action will continue unless economic conditions change. “I think if these conditions persist — tight labour markets and inflation — workers are going to continue to make demands of their employers, unionized workers, and likely exercise their right to strike. Because they are going to have to play catch–up now.” He said purchasing power of the working class has eroded so much that easing inflation may not help, either. “Even if we see a loosening of labour markets, even if we continue to see inflation decline, we’ll continue to see workers willing … to go on strike to push their demands.” The latest reading in Canada showed overall inflation cooled to 2.8 per cent in June, marking a substantial drop from the peak of 8.1 per cent for the same month last year. However, some measures, such as grocery prices, remained high. Black said that while only employees in unionized workplaces are likely to strike, all workers across the Canadian economy are feeling the pinch of rising costs of living. Employers, however, have asked striking unions to not be unreasonable in their demands. In April, during the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) strike, then-Treasury Board president Mona Fortier had said PSAC should be “prepared to compromise” to reach a deal with the federal government because it can’t “write a blank cheque” to them. According to Black, workers may not respond well to such appeals. “Workers aren’t dumb,” he said. “They know the record profits of the likes of Loblaws and Metro.” Lander said the pandemic only exacerbated this feeling of inequality. “Having come out of COVID, workers are angry because it’s now unacceptable that shareholders who were able to passively sit at home and not have to put themselves on the front line of the years of COVID and what that could do, they’re saying, well, now I want that share for me.” Loblaw, which was accused of profiteering off of high food inflation, defended itself in February. “Retail prices are not growing faster than costs, the company is not taking advantage of inflation to drive profit,” Loblaw CFO Richard Dufresne had said in an earnings call in February. Earlier this month, while reporting its latest quarterly earnings, the grocer blamed high supplier costs for rising food prices. High food inflation had little impact on the profits of Metro Inc., which rose by 10.4 per cent last quarter. Rising cost of living is not the only factor making public anger worse. Lander said that record temperatures this summer aren’t helping. “People tend to be angrier, tend to be more frustrated easily, tend to be more exhausted during periods of extreme heat,” he said. Black and Lander agreed that strikes in one sector could have a domino effect on other sectors. “If a public sector union can negotiate a 12-per cent wage increase over three years and another union goes to their employers and say, I want the 12 per cent over three or I want more than 12 per cent over three, how does the employer turn around and say, no, you can’t have that when another union’s already agreed to it?,” Lander said. Black added: “This is what happens when we see a strike action. We see workers learning from other workers.” “There’s a knock-on effect that other workers see that and learn from that. And so yes, we can see this kind of this kind of activity spread throughout the economy, to different sectors.” |
UAW president reveals Breana Noble A 32-hour work week, the ability to strike when a plant closes and paid volunteer work in the event of a closure were among the negotiating priorities emphasized by United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain on Tuesday during a Facebook livestream. The requests are "the members' demands" to the Detroit Three, he says. Making public to UAW members those demands being brought this week to General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV is another example of the administration's break from tradition in pursuit of greater involvement by the rank-and-file and more transparency following a years-long corruption scandal. Previously, Fain said, priorities were brought forward privately with the companies and dubbed "the president's demands" or "the economic demands." "More often than not, they would be presented to the company by the president behind closed doors," Fain said during the livestream. "Your elected national negotiators would be cut out of the conversation and cut out of the process. That was my experience as a national negotiator twice. I was incredibly frustrated to spend weeks bargaining with the company and subcommittees just to have the president's office come in later and cut a backroom deal without us. "So, those days are gone, and gone with those days is the false belief that union contracts are solely won by the president. They're not. They're won by the members. They are won by all of us, organizing together around the issues that unite us and collectively demanding what we are owed." The list of 10 demands reiterated much of what officials have been saying for months leading up to the talks that kicked off last month ahead of the contracts expiring Sept. 14: eliminate tiers on wages and benefits, restore the cost-of-living allowance and pensions and retiree medical benefits for all workers. Fain emphasized negotiators would call for "double-digit" pay raises in light of the Detroit Three CEOs' total compensation growing 40% over the past four years. He said all temporary workers should be rolled over to full-time, and their use limited in the future. Fain slammed the automakers for the increased and record profits posted in the first half of 2023 on top of the nearly a quarter of a trillion dollars they've made over the previous decade. The companies have emphasized their need for capital to invest the billions of dollars needed for their electrified future. They also do provide tens of thousands in profit-sharing bonuses to full-time employees, though not temporary or supplemental workers, on an annual basis. This spring alone, those bonuses were $14,760 at Stellantis, $12,750 at GM and $9,176 at Ford. "The big question everyone's going to ask is: 'How much is this going to cost?" Fain said. "But if this awful pandemic told us anything it's that there's more to life than just work. It's not enough to just survive. We should all have a right to thrive." To that end, Fain said the union would fight for more paid time off. While responding to questions from the online chat, he even said he would seek a shorter work week of 32 hours instead of 40. "Our members are working 60, 70, even 80 hours a week just to make ends meet — that's not a living," he said. "That's barely surviving, and it needs to stop." Additionally, the demands include the right to strike over plant closures. Fain also proposed a Working Family Protection Program, which would require the companies to pay UAW members for volunteer work if the automaker closes the plant in their community. "The Big Three have closed 65 plants over the last 20 years," Faith said. "That's been as devastating for our own towns, as it has been for us. We have the right to defend our communities from the corporate greed that's killing so many cities and towns." Stellantis in February indefinitely idled the Jeep Cherokee plant in Belvidere, Illinois. Fain said Vice President Rich Boyer and other leaders in the Stellantis Department are "standing strong in that fight." The union introduced the demands on Tuesday to Stellantis, and they will be presented to GM and Ford later this week, Fain said. Stellantis spokeswoman Jodi Tinson in a statement described the meeting as "very productive" with the demands being consistent with priorities previously outlined. "We will continue to review them to understand how they align with our Company proposals and where we can find common ground," Tinson said. "Stellantis and the UAW have a shared interest in these negotiations: securing the future of our 43,000 employees and their families. We have been clear from the start that we are not seeking a concessionary agreement. As we have done for more than 70 years, we will work constructively and collaboratively with the UAW to find solutions that will result in a contract that is competitive in the global market, responsibly addresses employee concerns and meets the needs of our customers." |
Ford recalls 870K F-150 pickups Associated Press Dearborn — Ford is recalling more than 870,000 newer F-150 pickup trucks in the U.S. because the electric parking brakes can turn on unexpectedly. The recall covers certain pickups from the 2021 through 2023 model years with single exhaust systems. Ford's F-Series pickups are the top-selling vehicles in the U.S. The company says in documents posted by government safety regulators Friday that a rear wiring bundle can come in contact with the rear axle housing. That can chafe the wiring and cause a short circuit, which can turn on the parking brake without action from the driver, increasing the risk of a crash. Drivers may see a parking brake warning light and a warning message on the dashboard. Ford says in documents that it has 918 warranty claims and three field reports of wire chafing in North America. Of these, 299 indicated unexpected parking brake activation, and 19 of these happened while the trucks were being driven. The company says it doesn't know of any crashes or injuries caused by the problem. Dealers will inspect the rear wiring harness. If protective tape is worn through, the harness will be replaced. If the tape isn't worn, dealers will install a protective tie strap and tape wrap. Owners will be notified by letter starting Sept. 11. |
Ford increases guidance as Anna Fifelski Ford Motor Co. increased its full-year guidance by $2 billion in adjusted operating income after the Dearborn automaker on Thursday reported $1.9 billion net income in the second quarter of 2023. That profit is nearly triple what it was a year ago. Ford increased its full-year guidance for adjusted operating profits to between $11 billion and $12 billion from $9 billion and $11 billion from improvements in supply chain, higher volumes, new Super Duty trucks and lower commodity costs. Additionally, projections of adjusted free cash flow increased to between $6.5 billion and $7 billion from about $6 billion. "I hope that we can be boringly predictable," CEO Jim Farley said during an earnings call, "when it comes to execution and delivering financials that are extremely ambitious, and dynamic, and creating the Ford of the future." But Ford predicted a greater loss from its EV business than expected. The company says it now expects to lose $4.5 billion from its Ford Model e division in 2023 after previously saying it would lose $3 billion. In the second quarter, the segment posted a $1.08 billion operating loss on revenue of $1.8 billion for the quarter. The automaker now says it expects to reach an EV run rate of 600,000 vehicles in 2024. It previously said it would reach production of 2 million vehicle in 2026, but John Lawler, Ford's chief financial officer, said it no longer is committed to that timeline. "We know that (EV) intention is good, because intention is about 20 to 30% of customers, but the take rate's only about 7%," he said on a call. "And so that tells us that they're too expensive. There's a pricing issue." That tracks with Ford's decision earlier this month to lower the price on its F-150 Lightning pickup truck. It finished plant upgrades at its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn for increased capacity, and battery material has decreased. The lowest-price Pro model's suggested retail price fell to $49,995 from $59,974, though its remains above the $39,974 price at which it launched in April 2022 following a few price hikes. The Lariat 510A model's price declined to $69,995 from $76,974. Ford, though, still is targeting an 8% operating profit margin for its EV business by the end of 2026, and a 10% adjusted operating profit margin for the company as a whole. Adjusted EBIT margins fell to 8.4% from 9.3% in the second quarter. The financial results were on quarterly revenue of $45 billion, up 12% year-over-year. Ford's adjusted earnings before interest and taxes increased to $3.8 billion, up 2.7% from a year ago. Ford's $3.7 billion net income for the first half of the year, up from a loss of $2.4 billion in 2022, puts it below its crosstown rivals. GM on Tuesday reported net income for the first half of 2023 was up 7% year-over-year at $4.9 billion, while it achieved $2.5 billion in the second quarter. Stellantis NV, which only reports earnings semiannually, posted a net profit of $12.1 billion, up 37% year-over-year for the first six months of the year. The financial results come after executives of the Detroit automakers started bargaining earlier this month with the United Auto Workers for a new contract. Their current contracts are set to expire Sept. 14, and UAW leaders are seeking to recoup benefits lost during the Great Recession and bankruptcies such as cost-of-living allowances, eliminate wage tiers and secure jobs in the electrification transition. The automaker listed the negotiations as a potential headwind for its increased guidance. Lawler noted the potential for the cost of a ratification bonus once an agreement is approved. "There will be costs that will be associated with a new contract, and that's about as far as we're going to go," he said. "But I think it would be inappropriate for us not to acknowledge that there will be costs associated with the contract. We know that we have to plan for that as part of our business." Operating profits for Ford Pro, its commercial products and services unit, nearly tripled from a year ago to $2.39 billion on revenue of $15.6 billion. Ford expects its operating profits to be nearly $8 billion in 2023, up from the previously stated $6 billion. The operating profits from Ford Blue, the automaker's hybrid and fossil fuel-powered business, was $2.31 billion on revenue of $25 billion after the segment lost money last year. The company says it will contribute about $8 billion in operating profits this year, up from $7 billion. Ford shares were falling 1.2% to $13.56 after closing at $13.73 on Thursday after it posted its results. |
Profits at Detroit Three Breana Noble Anna Fifelski The Detroit Three's nearly $21 billion combined profits in the first half of 2023, reported this week, are likely to intensify demands by the United Auto Workers in national contract talks this summer. Ford Motor Co. said Thursday it made $3.7 billion in net income in the first six months of the year, up from a loss of $2.4 billion in 2022. That included $1.9 billion in net income in the second quarter, nearly triple the results from the April-to-June quarter last year. As a result, the Dearborn automaker increased its full-year guidance by $2 billion in adjusted operating income, but it increased the timeline on its EV production goals and estimated losses on its EV business for 2023 would be $4.5 billion, up from $3 billion. That came after General Motors Co. posted $4.9 billion in earnings, its best since 2010, prompting it to increase its earnings guidance by $1 billion for the year. Stellantis NV — the maker of Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles — recorded its best first half since its creation in 2021 with a $12.1 billion net profit. Mounting auto profits are quickly becoming a line of attack by UAW President Shawn Fain, who calls the quarter of a trillion dollars in profit made by the three companies between 2013 and 2022 "obscene." More of those dollars, he says, should have gone into the pockets of workers. And now, it's time for the companies to give employees their due in the form of job security, the elimination of years-long grow-in period to the top wage, cost-of-living allowances, pensions for those without them and comparable compensation for workers at joint-venture electric vehicle battery plants. In a statement, Fain said: "Like every Big Three automaker, Ford is thriving. These eye-popping numbers come on top of a decade of massive profits. The Big Three made a quarter-trillion dollars in North American profits over the last decade, but they denied UAW members our fair share." After seeing the financial results, workers say they are willing to take action to get it. "I kind of chuckled because they can’t cry poor with $12 billion for the first half of the year," said John Barbosa, 52, an 18-year UAW member and a millwright apprentice at Stellantis' Toledo Assembly Complex in Ohio. "It makes me a little angry, and definitely, definitely fuels my will to stand and fight for what we have earned. "They've tried to insinuate that our demands may be a little too aggressive and that they need to make sure they’re competitive. Well, I don’t see anybody competing with Stellantis right now when it comes to first-half-of-the-year profits." Automakers say their employees do share in the wealth through annual profit-sharing checks that were $14,760 at Stellantis, $12,750 at GM and $9,176 at Ford from 2022's results. Temporary and supplemental employees, however, aren't eligible for the payouts. "There's a direct connection between their hard work and our success," GM CEO Mary Barra said on an earnings call this week, "and we have a great future ahead of us." 'Herculean' investments Meanwhile, the companies are undergoing their largest transformation since the advent of the moving assembly line more than a century ago, with batteries, EVs and other zero-emission vehicles claiming growing shares of their model lineups. "These numbers indicate that the companies are making a decent profit, but they need to be put in the context of No. 1, they're corporate-wide and the sheer cost of electrification," said Marick Masters, a business professor at Wayne State University. In the United States, automakers "have agreed between now and 2026 to commit $120 billion to electrification. If anything, that number is likely to increase. The investments they still have to make are still Herculean in scope." GM's operating income was $6.77 billion in North America for the first half of 2023, while Stellantis posted a $8.88 billion record adjusted operating income. Ford no longer breaks out earnings by geographic region. Ford is spending $50 billion by 2026 on EVs. By 2025, Stellantis has committed to spend about $35.5 billion on electrification and software. GM has said it will spend between $11 billion and $12 billion in capital expenditures this year alone, which is mostly on EVs. Those investments and having comparable costs are needed in order for workers to keep sharing in profits, Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares said this week during a roundtable with reporters. Executives have emphasized the need for improvements in efficiency, productivity, quality and absenteeism. "We also want to make sure that two or three years down the road, we'll be able, on a midterm basis, to continue to pay those performance bonuses by protecting the competitiveness of our operations and making sure that our operations continue to be highly profitable," he said, "so that those returns to the employees can be a reality, not only on a short-term basis but also on a midterm basis for that to happen. We need to address a certain number of operational issues that we have right now." In addition to transformation expenses, there are other claimants on the profits, Masters noted, from suppliers under pressure as their costs have increased and to dealers to keep pricing competitive for customers. Plus, the companies will be negotiating with the Canadian autoworkers union simultaneously when talks with Unifor kick off on Aug. 10. The contracts with the UAW expire Sept. 14, and Unifor's expire four days later. Ford noted contract negotiations could represent a headwind for achieving its upped guidance for the year, with John Lawler, its chief financial officer, specifically mentioning the traditional ratification bonuses provided when a new agreement is made. "There will be costs that will be associated with a new contract, and that's about as far as we're going to go," he said. "But I think it would be inappropriate for us not to acknowledge that there will be costs associated with the contract. We know that we have to plan for that as part of our business." Automakers, with their strong guidance, though, did share a positive picture on demand as the U.S. Commerce Department reported the country's economy grew to a 2.4% annual growth rate in the second quarter, despite the Federal Reserve increasing interest rates. Stellantis says it has more than four months of production on order. The automakers also seek to make their investors happy. Stellantis says it expects to complete an already-underway $1.7 billion share buyback program before the end of the year, which Fain criticized as robbery from workers. Non-union competition But car makers with the highest valuations, like EV maker Tesla Inc., don't have unions with which it has to bargain. Neither do the Detroit Three's foreign competitors manufacturing in the United States. Estimates suggest a $9 per hour labor cost difference on average as is. Now, with Ford losing money on EVs — and them representing a 40% increased production cost over the traditional internal combustion engines produced, according to Stellantis — those differences can burden efforts to offer affordable EVs to would-be customers. "It could throw a fly in the ointment," Dan Ives, an analyst at wealth advisory firm Wedbush Securities Inc., said about the negotiations. "It doesn't feel like the UAW is going into this drinking champagne and eating strawberries with whipped cream. They're in for a battle. There’s a massive path to success ahead, but the UAW needs to play ball with the likes of GM, Ford and Stellantis for this to all be a happy ending to the movie." Still, raking in billions of dollars in record profit could buoy public support for the UAW, as unions already experience their highest favorability — 71% — since 1965 amid an increase in union action, according to a Gallup survey. Combine that with a president who says he is the most union-friendly in U.S. history, low unemployment and high inflation, and the UAW may have the ingredients to make its demands. It's worked for others: On Tuesday, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters announced a tentative agreement offering existing full- and part-time employees at United Parcel Service Inc. $2.75 more per hour in 2023, and $7.50 more per hour over the length of the contract. That will make full-time workers' average top rate $49 per hour, and give part-timers a 48% average total wage increase over the next five years. "It's not business as usual. If it's not overwhelmingly a great contract, it might not be ratified," said Art Wheaton, director of Labor Studies at Cornell University. The record profits "make it really difficult for the automakers to cry poverty. You can afford it. It can hurt your competitiveness, but you can't say you can't afford it. You may not want to pay it, but yes, you can." For now, though, Ford says it's losing money on EVs. It's also elongated its timeline for increasing production of all-electric vehicles. F-150 Lightning had been down for five weeks this winter because of a battery issue. The automaker now expects to reach a 600,000 run rate in 2024, and Lawler, the CFO, said the company is no longer committed to 2026 to hit 2 million produced EVs. "We know that (EV) intention is good because intention is about 20 to 30% of customers, but the take rate's only about 7%," he said on a call with reporters. "And so that tells us that they're too expensive. There's a pricing issue." That tracks with Ford's decision earlier this month to lower the price on its F-150 Lightning pickup truck. It finished plant upgrades at its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn for increased capacity to a run rate of 150,000, about double what it does now. The lowest-priced Pro model's suggested retail price fell to $49,995 from $59,974, though its remains above the $39,974 price at which it launched in April 2022 following a few price hikes. The Lariat 510A model's price declined to $69,995 from $76,974. CEO Jim Farley also noted that it will have reduced the cost of building materials for the Mustang Mach-E SUV by $5,000 by the end of the year since its launch in 2020. "It may take a little longer, but we're in really good shape, because we have our first-generation customers out there, and the one thing that we do know is that EVs are loyal to the brands that they join," Lawler said. Added CEO Jim Farley: "We're seeing that the second EV purchase is much more loyal to the brand in these developed EV markets, so we're glad that we have all these customers in our digital-physical ecosystem." 'Boringly predictable' Still, Ford increased its full-year guidance for adjusted operating profits to between $11 billion and $12 billion from $9 billion and $11 billion from improvements in supply chain, higher volumes, new Super Duty trucks and lower commodity costs. Additionally, projections of adjusted free cash flow increased to between $6.5 billion and $7 billion from about $6 billion. Outside of Ford's EV business, operating profits for Ford Pro, its commercial products and services unit, nearly tripled from a year ago to $2.39 billion on revenue of $15.6 billion. Ford expects its operating profits to be nearly $8 billion in 2023, up from the previously stated $6 billion. The operating profits from Ford Blue, the automaker's hybrid and fossil fuel-powered business, was $2.31 billion on revenue of $25 billion after the segment lost money last year. The company says it will contribute about $8 billion in operating profits this year, up from $7 billion. Both segments also were profitable in each region in which they operate, Farley added. "I hope that we can be boringly predictable," CEO Jim Farley said during an earnings call, "when it comes to the execution and delivering financials that are extremely ambitious, and dynamic, and creating the Ford of the future." |
Did the Bank of Canada just push July 21, 2023 Interest rates can’t fix housing costs and they won’t take one bite out of food inflation. So why is the Bank of Canada continuing down this path? It was the news Canadians were dreading. As the Bank of Canada raised the interest rate to 5 per cent, hearts sank and anxiety rose for workers and their families. The hike will prove to be a disaster. It will not solve the affordability crisis and it will not have an influence on inflation. Instead, it will continue to force housing costs even higher and will not address the causes of the rising price of food (ahem, profiteering) at all. But it will cause hardship. Food and shelter alone drove two-thirds of the inflation consumers experienced in May. Food and housing. Essentials for Canadians. Statistics Canada recently reported that mortgage interest costs were the largest single contributor to inflation in June. How does raising the interest rate a 10th time in a year and a half solve this? It doesn’t — it makes it worse. A quarter of homeowners in Canada hold a variable rate mortgage. Thousands more have recently renewed or will renew their mortgage in the next few years, increasing mortgage payments dramatically. Many mortgage holders are landlords, leasing out their properties to renters. They will take the opportunity to raise rents to cover the additional cost. Again, driving up prices even further. Interest rates can’t fix housing costs and they won’t take one bite out of food inflation. So why is the Bank of Canada continuing down this path? The only answer is reliance on old orthodoxy that believes forcing pain on the working class through slow job and wage growth (eventually leading to job loss and a recession) and unemployment is the only way to deliver a healthy exit from this inflationary period. Unfortunately, this orthodoxy is dead wrong. And without a course correction workers are going to pay the price. The aim of interest rate hikes is to slow economic growth. What does that mean? Higher unemployment, slower job growth or, worst case scenario, a recession that causes extensive job loss and leaves permanent scars. The Bank of Canada says the underlying causes of the remaining inflation are low-unemployment and “high” wage growth, households having too much savings (and using it) and population growth (which causes demand for housing to increase). In the same media conference, they say the result of these underlying pressures is that corporations are still raising their prices too often. And yet, the Bank refuses to tackle the big elephant in the room: corporate profiteering. Well, I have news for orthodox thinkers. Each and every time a business raises their prices they are making a decision. And many of those decisions have resulted in higher profit margins. Profits as a share of GDP have averaged 21 per cent since the start of the pandemic and profit margins are higher too. At the same time, workers have lost purchasing power and after adjusting for inflation, wages have just not kept pace. Crises result in opportunities and there were so many opportunities that could have been taken up coming out of lockdowns and getting back to more regular life. They included the opportunity to build a more equitable and resilient world. Instead, policymakers at all levels are allowing corporations to get away with their own opportunism, siphoning more of workers hard earned cash for their own bank accounts. And now the Bank of Canada is diverting that hard earned cash and making life even more unaffordable. If the Bank of Canada continues down this path and federal and provincial governments continue to avoid taking action in their own spheres of responsibility, the ultimate result will be higher income and wealth inequality. Higher profit margins will be normalized and many workers will think they are asking for too much when they demand an income that allows them to survive, much less thrive. What a joke. In the beginning of this rate cycle, the public was led to believe that the Bank was attempting to achieve a soft landing. No one believes that now. Inflation fell to 3.4 per cent in May. Unemployment ticked up to 5.4 per cent. The job vacancy rate is easing and wage growth is slowing. Canada doesn’t need more unemployment or slower wage growth to solve inflation. We need more housing and it needs to be affordable. We need living wages and secure full-time jobs for people to thrive. We need policymakers at every level to address the real causes of excess/persistent inflation — profiteering, financialization, undersupply and supply chain bottlenecks. Without that we’re all left worse off regardless of the level of inflation. Lana Payne is Unifor national president.
|
Ford cuts F-150 Lightning prices Alexa St. John) Tesla's first Cybertruck finally rolled off production lines this month.
Ford said Monday morning it would slash the prices of its F-150 Lightning electric pickup trucks by up to nearly $10,000 just days after Tesla's rival Cybertruck finally rolled off the assembly line. The cheapest electric F-150 dropped nearly $10,000, from $59,974 to $49,995, while the most expensive trim option fell about $6,000, from $98,074 to $91,995. Ford said that upon the Lightning launch, material costs, supply constraints, and more contributed to the vehicle's high prices. Ford said that the cheaper prices are the result of "upgrades at the plant, combined with improving battery raw material costs and continued work on scaling production and cost." Ideally, the same will happen for other automakers as the industry looks to lower the prices of EVs overall. The industry's scramble to make EVs more affordable created a dash for supply that cost customers. Ford raised Lightning prices several times over the past year. But Ford could also be looking at an electric vehicle inventory problem. More and more of its Mustang Mach-E EVs are sitting on dealer lots, and it's taking longer for dealers to move both Mach-E and Lightning inventory than it did last year as the automaker ramps up production of both vehicles. Some electric cars are flying off dealer lots, while others have been harder to sell. That's according to data from Cloud Theory, a data analytics firm that tracks dealership inventory across the US. As automakers ramp up production of electric vehicles, some are having a harder time getting them off dealership lots than they did a year ago, Cloud Theory found. For example, while Hyundai has more than doubled the number of Ioniq 5 EVs in dealership inventory from 2022 to 2023, the turn rate (or the number of these cars that leave dealer lots within a 30 day period) has declined. Last year, about 82% of Ioniq 5's left lots within 30 days, but this year, only 37% have, according to Cloud Theory. Volkswagen, which has about four times as much inventory of the ID.4 on average in a given month this year than in 2022, was selling all of its ID.4 inventory within a month last year. This year, about 70% of ID.4's leave dealer lots in that time. The sale pace for Ford's Mustang Mach-E fell from 95% sold within 30 days last year to 64% selling in that period this year. Why this is the case A year ago, car companies were churning out fewer EVs, creating a perception of scarcity and sparking a bit of a supply-and-demand rush. Customers interested in going electric snatched the only Mustang Mach-E or other EVs they saw on the lot. High gas prices had even EV-curious customers taking the plunge. Fast forward to this year, and production is getting closer to full swing, meaning more of these cars are available. At the same time, more automakers are launching product — spreading the wealth in terms of customer purchases. And the broader economic environment, coupled with sky-high interest rates, has a lot of prospective buyers holding off on making a substantial purchase. "Vehicle movement — the way that we capture sales — is growing," Rick Wainschel, industry analyst and Cloud Theory VP of data science and analytics, told Insider. "But it's not nearly keeping pace with the rate of inventory growth. You've got pressure on those manufacturers that are selling those vehicles and introducing new ones and adding production to the existing ones all at the same time, all by the way, while Tesla is the 800-pound gorilla in the space." "A year ago, the overall inventory situation in the marketplace was very challenged," he added. Now, "There's this glut of new models to choose from for consumers, and it got diluted when you look at the turn rates across all of those manufacturers all doing that at the same time." Cloud Theory's numbers indicate which EVs might be easiest to find right now, and which might still be in short supply. To gather the data, Cloud Theory indexes dealership inventory via their websites, as well as collects diagnostic information like how long a vehicle was on their site. Cloud Theory does not get data for Tesla as the company does not sell through a traditional dealership model. "The train is going down the tracks" with electrification collectively, Wainschel said, but for individual automakers with an EV to sell, it's a lot harder. To be sure, deliveries of the Lighting are up this year compared with 2022, but the sales pace appears to be slowing. Ford shares fell more than 4% Monday morning following news of the price cuts. In addition to the price cuts, Ford said it is offering a $1,000 bonus for customers who purchase an XLT, Lariat, or Platinum Lightning model through the month of July. Ford and Tesla have had an interesting dynamic in recent years as Ford looks to catch up to the EV market leader. The news out of both companies signals that the electric pickup truck space is heating up and going to be even more competitive as others like Rivian, GM's Chevrolet, Stellantis' Ram, and more race to snatch market share.
|
'Everyone is going to have to Chris Fox, The Bank of Canada has now raised interest rates to their highest level in 22 years but many borrowers still haven’t been hit in the pocketbook. Earlier this week the central bank pushed up its key overnight lending rate to five per cent, marking the 10th increase since March 2022. For some variable rate mortgage holders with floating payments the pain from the latest hike will be immediately felt and will amount to about $14 more a month for every $100,000 owing on their mortgage. But for other homeowners, who may have fixed rates or variable mortgages with fixed-payments, the impact is more likely to be felt at renewal. Approximately half of all mortgages in Canada are set to renew in 2025 or 2026 due in part to the real estate frenzy that transpired over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. “For the fixed rate people it's going to be much less catastrophic. Many of those people will be able to shop for new mortgage and they will qualify because their mortgages are smaller due to the good payments they've made and they can manage it (the higher payments),” mortgage broker Ron Butler told CP24.com. this week. “The variable situation is somewhat more concerning because there may be no principal being paid down or it (the balance of the loan) might have even grown (due to fixed payments that don’t even cover interest).” If you have a mortgage coming up for renewal here is what you need to know about this higher rate environment. SOME PAYMENTS COULD SKYROCKET Many variable rate mortgage holders – those at four of the six big banks - have what is known as fixed payments. That has meant that as rates have increased more and more of their money has gone to interest rather than principal, even as their total payment has remained the same. The practice has, in turn, created a situation where some homeowners have amortizations that have risen well beyond the ones they agreed to when they first took out their mortgage and that is likely to be a problem come renewal. “Because of these rate hikes some homeowners might have an amortization of 60 years and the current lender will likely not allow them to keep that,” RATESDOTCA mortgage expert Victor Tran told CP24.com. “They will need to bring it down to the contractual amortization and if that happens their payments are going to skyrocket. It is going to be a lot higher than what they are currently paying.” Tran said that he expects lenders to show some flexibility when it comes to homeowners who haven’t been paying off much, if any, principal. But he said that it is not likely that homeowners will be able to keep extended amortization periods forever, an opinion that Butler also holds. Butler told CP24.com that banks “will almost always” offer a chance to go back to a 30 year amortization, which is the maximum allowed. But he said that might not make an enormous amount of difference for a homeowner whose payment is set to double, say from $2,000 to $4,000 a month. “They (the bank) may look at it closely and find out that yeah, you are right, you're just hopeless and you can never make the (new) payment. If that is the case they are allowed by the regulator in some cases to go to 35 years or even a 40-year amortization if there is proven financial inability to pay. But again, it doesn't reduce the payment back to $2,000,” he said. RATES WILL LIKELY BE HIGHER REGARDLESS OF WHEN YOU RENEW The Bank of Canada has said that it expects inflation to return to its two per cent target in the middle of 2025. That would allow for interest rate cuts. But few industry insiders expect rates to return to the levels that they were at in 2020 and 2021 anytime soon, if ever. “We're never coming back to those days when people were getting rates of 1.59, 1.89, 1.99. It is gone forever,” Butler said. “So whatever rate you get is guaranteed to be higher than what you started with five years before. It will either be a little bit higher, instead of two per cent it will be three-and-a-half per cent, or it will be lot higher, like in the six per cent range. So that is the key thing to understand. It is that everyone is going to have to pay more.” “Over the past month we've seen fixed rates increase by a full percentage point,” Tran added. “That’s huge” YOU MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO SWITCH LENDERS Many homebuyers who took out mortgages in 2020 or 2021 did so with historically low interest rates. The stress test meant that those homebuyers still had to qualify at a rate of 5.25 per cent or their contractually agreed upon rate plus two percentage points, whichever was higher. But those seeking to take out a new mortgage today or jump lenders could be stress tested at a rate in excess of eight per cent. That, says Tran, could leave many existing homebuyers with few options other than to renew with their current lender where they will be able to avoid the stress test. “I've had many customers or former clients that are simply not able to take advantage of lower rates with other lenders because they can't qualify to switch out so they are at the mercy of the current lender,” he told CP24.com. “I think a lot of the lenders know that unfortunately that these customers will have difficulty qualifying elsewhere. But it's unfortunate because they're not going to offer these customers the best rate possible. They're kind of holding them hostage and just giving them a mediocre rate because they know that they have nowhere to go.” REFINANCING COULD ALSO POSE CHALLENGES One way that home owners could reduce the payment shock is by extending their amortization. But doing so isn’t necessarily easy, warns Tran. He says that some homebuyers won’t qualify for a new mortgage due to the stress test while others might conclude that the costs of doing so are just too onerous. “Anytime you make a major change like that you have to go through the whole nine yards again. You have to requalify, you have to go through the stress test again, you have to potentially get an appraisal done at your cost and you have to get a lawyer involved to register a new mortgage title, also at an additional cost,” he told CP24.com. PATIENCE IS KEY Butler says that his best advice to homeowners staring down an impending renewal is “not to panic.” He says that in many cases a bank might offer an early renewal with a so-called blended rate but he said taking such an offer is almost always a mistake, when it replaces a lower rate obtained prior to this recent run up in the cost of borrowing. “Don't give up 3.19 and take 5.1 as some kind of protection,” he said. “If you have a renewal coming up shop around, don't blend and only start looking at it 90 days before the date of your renewal because you don't want to give up that great rate. That just doesn't make sense.
|
Ford to seek flexible EV production July 14, 2023 MICHIGAN: Ford Motor Co will ask the United Auto Workers (UAW) union for flexibility to reduce electric-vehicle (EV) production in case the US market for battery-powered cars lags behind expectations. Negotiations open today for a new four-year contract for Ford’s more than 57,000 US hourly workers. And talks are expected to be contentious as the union seeks pay raises, a restoration of cost-of-living increases and job guarantees while the industry shifts to less labor intensive electric-vehicle production. New UAW president Shawn Fain has said he is going to “war” against the Detroit automakers and accused them of engaging in a “race to the bottom” in the EV transition with factories that will employ fewer workers earning lower wages. This week, Fain eschewed the ceremonial handshake-across-the-bargaining-table with chief executive officers that has marked the opening of auto contract talks for decades, saying he’ll do so “when they come to the table with a deal.” Ford will seek leeway in its US$50bil (RM231bil) plan to boost EV production 15-fold to two million models a year by the end of 2026. The company wants the ability to move workers to factories building the most in-demand models, whether they’re powered by electricity or traditional internal combustion, according to Ford sources who requested anonymity discussing internal matters. The current union contract restricts Ford’s ability to flex production, they said. Ford has reason for caution. The United States has been the slowest major market to adopt EVs, lagging behind China and Europe. EV sales growth in the world’s biggest economy slowed to just under 50% in the first half of the year, down from 71% during the same period in 2022, as inventories of battery-powered models ballooned. Ford’s US EV sales fell 2.8% during the second quarter as it overhauled a Mexican factory to boost output of the Mustang Mach-E, while sales of the F-150 Lightning plug-in pick-up grew just 4%. Ford is hoping to convince the union to give it more flexibility by noting that it employs as many as 14,000 more US hourly workers than either General Motors Co or Stellantis NV, parent company of Chrysler and Jeep. Having the biggest US hourly workforce costs Ford an extra US$1bil (RM4.61bil) a year compared to its domestic competitors, the sources said. Ford’s labour costs, including wages and benefits, are US$64 (RM295) an hour, compared to US$55 (RM254) an hour at the non-union assembly plants of international automakers such as Toyota Motor Corp. That creates a labour cost gap of US$900mil (RM4.2bil) with the international automakers, the people said. Labour costs at Tesla Inc are even lower at US$45 to US$50 (RM208 to RM231) an hour. Ford also plans to pledge to bring more EV manufacturing in-house to help offset the lower labour requirements, the people said. Chief executive officer Jim Farley has said controlling more elements of EV and battery production will give Ford a competitive advantage. Last month, Farley penned a Detroit Free Press opinion piece defending Ford’s hourly compensation, which he wrote comes to US$112,000 (RM516,712) in annual pay and benefits. That elicited a sharp response from UAW vice-president Chuck Browning, who accused Farley of misleading the public and “utilising old, musty and ineffective tactics.” Farley is under pressure to reverse US$3bil (RM13.8bil) in projected EV losses this year and achieve an ambitious goal of generating an 8% return, before interest and taxes, on battery-powered models by the end of 2026. — Bloomberg |
Rising interest rates worry By Craig Lord A financial expert breaks down what the Bank of Canada’s anticipated interest rate hike will mean for Canadians and how to best prepare. A growing number of Canadians are worried that interest rates are rising faster than they keep up, new polling suggests, just as many economists expect the Bank of Canada will deliver another rate hike this week. Polling from Ipsos Public Affairs conducted exclusively for Global News between June 19 and 20 shows a growing number of Canadians are concerned they won’t be able to pay off debts like credit card bills amid higher interest rates and inflation that continues to cause pain, particularly at the grocery store. More than four in five Canadians (81 per cent) say they’re worried inflation will continue to make life unaffordable, according to the Ipsos survey. Some 71 per cent of Canadians are worried that interest rates will rise faster than they can adjust, according to the polling. That’s slightly higher than results in April, when the Bank of Canada held rates steady for the second time this year as it waited to see whether its previous hikes would do enough to slow the economy and bring inflation down its two per cent target. But the central bank ended that brief pause in June with a 25-basis-point rate increase that surprised most economists. The bank’s next rate decision is set for Wednesday. Many economists — including all six big Canadian banks — are expecting policymakers will not be satisfied with a single hike in June and will bring the policy rate up to 5.0 per cent as core inflation remains sticky and the economy shows signs of resilience. That will be the highest point for the Bank of Canada’s benchmark interest rate since 2001, says Rubina Ahmed-Haq, personal finance expert and host of For What It’s Worth on the Corus Entertainment radio network. Corus Entertainment is the parent company of Global News. Ahmed-Haq told Global News’ Jaden Lee-Lincoln over the weekend that the higher rate environment is new territory for many homeowners who have never had to pay their mortgage at rates this high. Indeed, some 79 per cent of millennials said in the Ipsos survey they were worried about the pace of rate increases, the highest proportion of any other demographic. Some 72 per cent of millennials said they were concerned about their plans to purchase a home, start a family or travel in the future amid rising interest rates. “For most people who own a home today, they’ve never experienced this interest rate environment,” Ahmed-Haq said. “There really is a paycheque-to-paycheque situation in many Canadian households.” Debt piles up The higher interest rates go, the more Canadians are paying to service household debt. The higher cost of borrowing comes into play when homeowners renew their fixed-rate mortgages, or on mortgages and loans with variable rates of interest such as home-equity lines of credit (HELOCs). Debt is a particular pain point for Canadians, who hold the highest level of household debt in the G7, according to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. Ipsos’s survey shows 55 per cent of Canadians are worried they won’t be able to pay off their entire credit card bill, up a percentage point from similar polling in April. Roughly six in 10 (63 per cent) of respondents said they couldn’t handle a sudden expense of $1,000 or more. A separate poll from insolvency firm MNP released Monday shows that more than half of Canadians (52 per cent) say they are $200 or less away from not being able to pay off all their bills. That figure is up six percentage points from a survey in April. Ahmed-Haq said Canadians might feel like they’re forced to take on additional debt just to make payments on their existing loans, but this can start a “vicious cycle” that only sees debt obligations grow. If consumers are forced into this position, she recommends only ever taking on a loan at a lower interest rate than the debt you’re paying off — consolidating high-interest debt like credit cards into a loan with a lower monthly payment to help keep the loans manageable. Canadians forced into difficult decisions While recent interest rate increases have been smaller in magnitude compared with the rapid hikes seen last year, the traditional wisdom is that it takes 12-18 months for the full impact of higher rates to be felt in the economy. David Gowling, senior vice-president at MNP, says the signs of mounting stress around Canadians’ debt show this pressure is now starting to bear down on household budgets. “As those interest costs keep increasing, that has to come from somewhere else in the budget,” he tells Global News. “And people are trying to cut. But you can only cut so far and that’s where you start to feel, ‘OK, if this goes much further, I’m going to be in some serious trouble.’” Even as the overall rate of annual inflation shows signs of cooling, Canadians trying to keep up with the rising cost of living and higher interest rates have had to cut back more and more, Ipsos polling shows. Fewer Canadians are travelling as they try to trim expenses, with 29 per cent saying they’re cutting back on both domestic and international travel — up four and five percentage points from April’s surveys, respectively. Almost two-thirds (64 per cent) of families with kids are concerned they won’t be able to afford a holiday this summer. Some 56 per cent of Canadians are dining out less — up from 48 per cent in April — and nearly half (48 per cent) are cutting back on entertainment spending, compared with 42 per cent in April. At the grocery store, more than half of Canadians are now using flyers (53 per cent, up five percentage points) and nearly a third are using coupons (32 per cent, up four percentage points. Some 30 per cent of shoppers said they were changing their grocery stores to find cheaper products, up from one in four in April. — with files from Global News’ Anne Gaviola These are some of the findings of an Ipsos poll conducted between June 19 and 20, 2023, on behalf of Global News. For this survey, a sample of 1,000 Canadians aged 18+ was interviewed. Quotas and weighting were employed to ensure that the sample’s composition reflects that of the Canadian population according to census parameters. The precision of Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval. In this case, the poll is accurate to within ± 3.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, had all Canadians aged 18+ been polled. The credibility interval will be wider among subsets of the population. All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error and measurement error |
Ford sales jump 10% in Q2 on July 8, 2023 Ford (F) on Thursday reported second quarter sales rose from a year ago with strength coming from its F-150 pickup line while sales of electric vehicles fell during the quarter. In the second quarter, Ford said sales grew 9.9% from a year ago to 531,662 vehicles. For the first half of the year, Ford sales were up 10% compared to 2022. EV sales for Ford fell 2.8% during the quarter, with Mustang's Mach-E sales declining by 21.1% and its E-Transit electric van sales falling by 3.8%. Ford, however, said say Mach-E sales "quickened" at the end of Q2. Ford stock was down 2.5% following this release. The company's crown jewel F-Series pickup lineup, in contrast, notched a 34% sales jump in Q2, as well as a 24.7% gain sequentially from Q1. In terms of overall pickup sales, Ford said combined F-Series, mid-size Ranger, and compact Maverick sales of 246,155 pickups outsold all of rival GM’s Silverado, Sierra, Colorado, Canyon, and Hummer EV pickups in Q2. Ford's all-new line of Super Duty pickups saw "continued momentum" as well, with Q2 sales up over 28.5%. Ford says total truck sales were up 26.2% for the quarter, which Ford said makes it the top-selling truck maker in the US. Ford SUVs — including the Bronco Sport and Escape — also saw double-digit gains. “Ford achieved both best-selling brand and truck for six consecutive months this year on the strength of F-Series, vans, our new Escape, and F-150 Lightning,” said Andrew Frick, Ford VP of sales, distribution, and trucks in a statement. “Improved Mustang Mach-E inventory flow began to hit at the end of Q2 following the retooling of our plant earlier this year, which helped Mustang Mach-E sales climb 110% in June.” Ford also experienced a recovery in F-150 Lightning EV sales following a production shutdown in Q1 due to a battery issue that led to a fire at its plant. Ford said Lightning sales were up 119% in Q2 versus a year ago and up 4.1% sequentially from the first quarter. Overall Ford EV sales for the first half of the year were up 11.9%. The Ford F-150 Lightning displayed at the Philadelphia Auto Show, Jan. 27, 2023, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File) Ford's Q2 sales figures follow a strong quarter of gains for GM, which saw its sales surge nearly 19% in the quarter. Ford and GM's results follow upbeat numbers reported by Tesla (TSLA), Rivian (RIVN), and Honda (HMC) in recent days. Honda’s sales in particular were noteworthy, with sales jumping an astounding 44.7% compared to a year ago. Ford will report full second quarter financial results after the bell on July 27. |
Stellantis deal reached to restart By Sean Previl A deal has been reached between Stellantis and the federal and Ontario governments to resume construction of the electric vehicle battery gigafactory in Windsor, Ont., the company confirmed on Wednesday. It said in a news release that NextStar Energy, which had a joint venture with Stellantis and LG Energy Solution, signed a “binding agreement that secures the future of battery cell and module production in Windsor.” “We are pleased that the federal government with the support of the provincial government came back and met their commitment of leveling the playing field with the (Inflation Reduction Act),” Stellantis North America chief operating officer Mark Stewart said in a joint statement with LG Energy. The deal comes after just over a month of negotiations following a decision by Stellantis to stop building the plant, saying the federal government had not delivered what was promised and threatened to move the plant elsewhere. The plant was announced last year and it was expected to create 2,500 jobs, with all levels of government to provide financial support. Last month, Stellantis said it had received and was reviewing an offer to keep the factory as both Ottawa and Ontario said negotiations were ongoing. Details of the deal have not been released, however, Innovation, Science and Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne said in June that the amount the governments will offer shouldn’t surprise anyone as Canada aimed to “level the playing field” and match subsidies offered by the U.S. under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Ontario’s Economic Development Minister Vic Fedeli told Global News in an interview that the deal amounts to $15 billion in tax incentives for battery production with the province taking on $5 billion. In addition, the minister said the deal has resulted in a Canada-Ontario auto pact, that will see identical incentives offered to other battery manufacturers who set up shop in the province. “I think this is a historic deal, it’s a great agreement and it protects the thousands of jobs quite frankly that were at stake,” Fedeli said. Dong-Myung Kim, president and head of the Advanced Automotive Battery Division of LG Energy said the company was happy to finally move forward with building the plant. “It’s a good day not only for our joint venture, but also for Canada,” he said in the statement. Stewart also thanked the efforts of Unifor in working to get a deal done “in our shared commitment to protecting thousands of new jobs.” The union said in a statement it welcomed the agreement and thanked the governments involved and the company “for reaching this important conclusion and taking the necessary action to secure the Stellantis production footprint in Canada.” |
"Fighting for COLA" UAW July 5, 2023 In a new video, UAW President Shawn Fain lays out a key goal of 2023 contract negotiations with General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis: winning back COLA, or Cost of Living Adjustments. Without COLA, inflation has far outpaced the raises UAW members negotiated in 2019. By contrast, CEOs of the Big Three have seen their pay jump over 40 percent between 2019 and 2022. “Inflation is hammering the American people. We see it in the cost of eggs, the price of milk. We feel the squeeze at the gas pump, and when we pay rent. Bills go up and our paychecks don’t. Working people can’t keep up. “That’s why we’re fighting for Cost of Living Adjustments, also known as COLA. “Back in 1946, the UAW went on strike against General Motors, and two years later was the first union to secure Cost of Living in a union contract. The clause meant that wages would be tied to inflation, so workers wouldn’t be left behind economically. When inflation took off in the 1970s, the UAW won Cost of Living across all of our employers to ensure that we could keep up. “Like so many other important gains autoworkers made over the decades, we lost COLA in 2009 as a result of the auto bankruptcies during the Great Recession. “Now, the auto industry is back, and then some. In the past decade, the Big Three automakers have made a quarter of a trillion dollars in profits in North America. Meanwhile, autoworkers real wages have stayed flat, or even worse, they’ve regressed. In 2019, we won 6.1 percent wage increases. In the three and a half years since, inflation is triple that, at 18.3 percent. Inflation has wiped out those gains, and then some. That’s unacceptable, and unsustainable. That’s money we’re leaving on the table, while our employers keep pocketing billions more. “Autoworkers need Cost of Living now. Let’s get back in the fight for good auto jobs. For our families, for our communities, and for working people everywhere.” Big Three contracts are set to expire on September 14th. View the video here. |
Ford's product guru, veteran of Tom Krisher Dearborn — Across the room from Ford Motor Co. Product Development chief Doug Field was a pile of two-dozen auto parts, each with its own small computer and software written by the parts manufacturer. Field was hired away from running Apple Inc.'s secret auto project two years ago, and before that served as Tesla Inc.'s head of engineering. He explained at an investor event that the automaker is moving to get rid of the pile, consolidating most computing decisions into a central processor running software written by Ford. The change will fundamentally change how people use their cars. Most automakers are counting on software services to boost future profit margins. Field, 57, also Ford's chief technology officer, talked to The Associated Press about the change and the transformation to electric vehicles. The interview is edited for length and clarity. Q: How far along is Ford on moving to this central computing system? A: The transition has happened where we designed the hardware and the software for the immediate user interface, the center screen. That's gone into both the F-150 Lightning EV as well as the internal combustion F-Series. The next step is with our next generation of electric vehicles (coming in 2025). We're expanding to control the overall vehicle and control over the autonomy system. There will be software in parts that comes from suppliers that is appropriate. The reason for that is to make it as fast as possible. A great example is firing the air bag. We don’t want that coming back through the central passage. Q: As a driver, why should I care about this? A: The car’s a robot, which means the interaction with the software includes pieces of hardware. So something like an Amazon interface where you know a delivery is coming. A one-time code opens the trunk. Doesn’t open the rest of the car. They get to drop it off. That requires an interaction between centralized software and what today is a locking-unlocking module. There also are sensors that we don’t have access to the information. An easy example is an autonomy system that’s supposed to keep you in the lane. There’s a camera. We can't say to the customer that we're going to give you a dash cam for free or for a subscription where it’s always running. And if we detect any kind of a bump or anything like that, you’ve got a 30-second recording. We will be able to do that. We talked a little bit about our ability to predict if the car is heading toward a failure or a wear-out situation. I want to count wiper strokes combined with how much water is coming down and where it’s being driven and how dirty it is. Maybe develop an algorithm that knows exactly when your wiper blades are wearing out. Q: How do you come up with something that's compelling enough to get me to part with my hard-earned money and subscribe? A: The model is already transitioning from ‘you check a box when you buy the car’ to ‘you can get a free trial.’ You only part with your hard-earned money after you are on the road trying it and say, ‘this is pretty great.’ A big part of how I try to guide the engineers is you must earn the right to collect money. You’re going to come up with things, you’re going to try them. Q: You've shown the bear cam, where a Bronco parked at a campsite recognizes a bear nearby and may honk the horn to scare it away. How important is security? A: We are going to build a whole set of services around this. The car is the most sophisticated sensor that you have in your life, and the number of accelerometers and microphones and cameras and things on it will allow it to be not only something that protects you when you’re in the car, but it’ll actually be useful when you’re not there. Even acting as a remote sentry if there’s stuff going on outside the house. Q: Does having a centralized computer open you more to the possibility of hacking? A: Anything where you are allowing the car to be software-updated opens you to that possibility. You need to have an architecture where that has been really carefully thought through. And the more you go toward things like firing the airbags or controlling the steering, the more that becomes a pretty involved process to actually update your access. Q: How long will Ford still be selling internal combustion vehicles? A: There are a number of applications where it is going to be near impossible for an EV to perform the same mission. There will be many, many places where EVs are a slam dunk. There will be ones where it’s going to take a lot of work to get battery technologies to the point where it could serve that mission. There are ones we see now that the ICE engine needs to be a part of it. Maybe we partially electrify it, but they’ll be out there. The incremental value to the world of getting those last ice engines out versus the value that they provide to an ambulance in Alaska. That will take a very, very long time. Q: Affordability has become a big issue. Ford has gotten out of cheaper cars in the U.S. Is there a $20,000 EV coming? A: I don’t want to talk a lot about what we’re doing here. It is possible, with the advent of EVs, to make step changes in the way vehicles are built and sourced. Yes, I believe very low cost EVs are possible. I also believe the way the business model is changing is going to require it. If you are in the software business, what you want is installed base. How many people can I sell software to? To do that, you need affordability. |
A fight over the future of Administration weighing goals of selling more EVs, building up manufacturing here Alexander Panetta A struggle is unfolding in Washington over who will make the electric vehicles that the Biden administration sees as a key part of the transition to a carbon-neutral economy. And some Canadians are taking sides in the debate with long-term implications. The specific flashpoint is the landmark Inflation Reduction Act, and the large tax credits it offers American consumers for buying an EV. The U.S. government is now writing the rules to implement this law, arguably the biggest legislative achievement of the Biden era. The clash, in a nutshell, revolves around a question: What is the main goal here? Is it to sell more electric vehicles, more quickly, speeding the transition to a low-carbon economy? Or is it to achieve the slower, steadier re-industrialization of North America — one that would reduce long-term reliance on China and draw manufacturing here as part of what the White House has taken to calling Bidenomics? That debate is playing out as the U.S. Treasury Department studies public comments while designing its tax credits — which are worth up to $7,500 per car. Canadians might remember this issue. It was a sore spot between Ottawa and Washington until an amicable resolution, with the law ultimately giving North American products preferential treatment. Now the rest of the world wants in on that deal. Other countries and importing companies have been fighting to make their products eligible for those tax credits, and are arguing for an expansive interpretation of the law. Their argument is both environmental and practical. They say meeting climate goals requires a rapid electrification of the vehicle fleet and there's no way of getting there if the rules are so protectionist that virtually no cars qualify for tax credits. The counter-argument invokes national security. In short: Western countries are disturbingly dependent on China for industrial inputs that power our economy, like critical minerals, and this law is supposed to change that. Amid a manufacturing renaissance in the U.S., this argument goes that the U.S. can't count on China for its inputs. Public commenters include Quebec The Treasury Department released an interim draft this spring and gave everyone until June 16 to weigh in on a series of highly technical judgment calls it needs to make. Such judgment calls involve the definition of a trade agreement, whether leased cars count as commercial vehicles (which qualify easily for the credit), which minerals deserve protections and how to calculate the value of battery parts. In aggregate, these seemingly eye-glazing dilemmas hold serious implications for everything from the environment, to U.S. alliances and to national security, according to public comments submitted to the Treasury. Among those urging the regulators to get stricter are the Quebec government and a company based in B.C. and Quebec. Both have expressed concern in their submissions that the proposed rules are too permissive. It's a plot twist from a year ago, when Canadians were fuming the law was too strict — back when Canada feared being shut out of the credits entirely. Canadian battery-technology manufacturer Nano One Materials Corp. argues that the draft regulations are too broad. One complaint, for instance, is that the law needs stricter rules for iron. Iron makes up one-third of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) car batteries. The company says it needs the same protections as critical minerals, otherwise these U.S. tax credits will wind up subsidizing batteries mostly produced in China. 'A big loophole' "To me that's a big loophole. And it needs to get resolved," Nano One CEO Dan Blondal told CBC News. "We will be funnelling tax dollars to our competitors overseas." LFP technology reflects the history of electric vehicles. Decades ago, it was actually developed partly in Quebec, including by publicly funded institutions — Hydro-Québec and the Université de Montréal. But the technology never took off here. It eventually wound up being mass-produced in China and patent fees were waived for Chinese companies producing domestically. Now those patents are expiring right as LFP is gaining in popularity. Nano One starts production this year in Candiac, Que., after building partnerships with mining giant Rio Tinto, Volkswagen and energy-storage company Our Next Energy. Blondal calls the Inflation Reduction Act a rare chance to ease dependency on a rival, China, that once famously cut off mineral exports to Japan during a dispute. "We have … a generational opportunity," Blondal said. "Otherwise we'll lose on national security. We'll give away jobs and we'll perpetuate many of the environmental issues and GHG emissions … that are kind of the antithesis of our net-zero ambitions." Quebec also argues in its submission that the rules, as currently written, risk further entrenching U.S. dependency on unreliable countries with state-funded companies — an unstated allusion to China. Sales of electric vehicles are surging and they're expected to dominate the market within years. What's not clear: Where auto plants will source their parts. (IHS Global Insight, Goldman Sachs Research) Their position has allies. The U.S. domestic mining lobby warned in its submission that rivals have a stranglehold on industrial minerals and China will continue to control 70 per cent of the battery supply chain through 2030. The National Mining Association argued the Biden administration's current draft regulations are inconsistent with the legislation's goal of reversing this trend. "Implement [this law] to support the domestic sourcing goal of Congress rather than finding ways to undercut it," the association said. That get-strict approach has a high-profile endorsement, from no less than the U.S. senator who provided the critical swing vote that passed the law. Among those submitting comments was Sen. Joe Manchin, who negotiated many of the key provisions of the bill before he let it pass. In a signed letter, he listed several ways the Biden administration strayed, in his opinion, from the intention of the law. Manchin: 'Follow the law' He argues leased cars shouldn't count as commercial vehicles. He says Biden stretched the definition of free-trade agreements to include a critical-minerals deal signed with Japan, and another he's working on signing with Europe. And he fumed that, under a proposed phase-in period of at least two years, tax money can go to batteries where as little as 25 per cent meet Manchin's intended conditions. "My comment is simple," Manchin wrote at the tail end of an 11-page letter filled with technical complaints. "Follow the law." The counter-argument from the administration is that the law isn't always clear. There's a judgment call involved, like what counts as a commercial vehicle. The climate counter-argument Advocates of the more generous application of tax credits cite the urgent threat of climate change. They say it's going to be a challenge hitting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's goal of EVs accounting for two thirds of light vehicles sold in the U.S. by 2032. The U.S. will fall slightly short of that, according to private-sector forecasts by IHS and Goldman Sachs and others. The policy design matters. EV projections vary, in part, on what sorts of incentives get adopted by government, including in the Inflation Reduction Act. Some carmakers, like Stellantis, urged the administration to stay the course, and produce final rules as flexible as the draft version. A lobby group for big international auto companies that also manufacture inside the U.S. said it applauded the flexible attitude in the draft regulations. "[This approach] will help more Americans better afford the transition to a clean vehicle of their choice," wrote Autos Drive America.
An LFP battery pack for the Ford Mustang-Mack. Ford is partnering with a Chinese supplier to build in the U.S. It's not clear what tax rules will apply here. (Rebecca Cook/Reuters) The final rule should be out soon. Then there's another, related, battle ahead. Starting next year, the Inflation Reduction Act forbids tax credits going to batteries produced by a so-called foreign entity of concern. Those details still need to be defined. So it's unclear what that incoming rule will mean for carmakers, inside the U.S., that buy batteries from the Chinese giant CATL. For example, Ford is partnering with CATL to produce in Michigan; Tesla already buys CATL batteries and is reportedly considering a U.S.-based joint deal like Ford's. That uncertainty looms over the industry. In the meantime, the smaller Canadian battery company, Nano One, says it's watching closely. |
Hundreds Of Ford’s White Collar Workers Are Reportedly About To Be Out Of A Job Sources suggest that the cuts will come from Ford's Blue and Model e divisions and may be limited to the USA by Stephen Rivers Many white-collar Ford workers could be out of a job starting as soon as next week. That’s the report coming from sources with knowledge about the issue that aren’t authorized to speak about the job cuts publicly. For now, the company isn’t saying anything but the move could be a part of its Ford+ plan. Rival automakers along with Ford have signaled the need to cut costs as they transition from internal combustion engines to EVs. Both Stellantis and General Motors have recently utilized buyout programs to do just that. According to multiple reports, Ford isn’t offering such a program with regard to these job cuts. A source from one of those reports says that Ford will lay off “several hundred” salaried employees in the near future. That could happen as soon as next week. It’s believed that the cuts will be limited to workers in North America and could be completely within the USA. Ford spokesman T.R. Reid said in a statement to the Detroit Free Press: “We have nothing to announce. As we’ve said, part of the ongoing management of our business includes aligning our global staffing to meet business plans, and staying cost competitive as our industry evolves. At the same time, we continue to hire in key areas so that we have the skills and expertise needed to deliver on the Ford+ plan.” That plan is one that the brand has been working on for a long while. It includes putting itself in a position to scale EV production while also reducing costs. Last August it said that it would end up cutting some 3,000 jobs between both the USA and India. At the time, it was believed that they would be limited to just Ford Blue, the automaker’s ICE branch. However, the cuts reported above are specifically across both Ford Blue and Ford Model e, the brand’s EV division. Evidently, the Ford Pro commercial arm will remain unaffected for now. We’ll keep an eye out for more news as it develops.
|
EV metals will come from dead David R. Baker A new U.S. plant will soon offer a solution for tight supplies of critical metals: Pull them out of dead batteries in a process that produces fewer emissions than competitors. Recycling start-up Nth Cycle is opening its first full-scale plant in Fairfield, Ohio, to produce a mix of nickel and cobalt — key ingredients of the lithium-ion batteries that power smartphones and electric vehicles. The company will hold a "sneak peek" of the plant for members of the community Monday, with full commissioning planned this fall, said Chief Executive Officer Megan O'Connor. The company hasn't disclosed a precise cost for the plant, but says it's investing $25 million to $30 million in the facility. It's part of a wave of plants under construction across the U.S. to bolster the supply chain for batteries, a critical component of the global energy transition. The vital technology is now mostly made in China, but the Biden administration's sweeping climate legislation has driven federal dollars toward boosting U.S. output. "We're trying to bring back an entire industry," O'Connor said in an interview. Nth Cycle's process involves dissolving the shredded remains of spent batteries in a water-based solution, then using a series of electrified filters to extract specific metals. It also works with electronic waste, metal scrap and mine tailings. And it's designed to be modular, so individual customers can deploy Nth Cycle's processing unit — dubbed the Oyster — at their own factory or mine. The company boasts far lower greenhouse gas emissions than standard recycling methods. Nth Cycle hasn't yet named any of its customers, but O'Connor said they include automakers, battery producers and consumer electronics makers. She added that there's currently no domestic producer of Nth Cycle's nickel-cobalt product, known as mixed hydroxide precipitate. So working with Nth Cycle will give customers a way to take advantage of "buy-American" incentives in the federal Inflation Reduction Act, she said. |
Ford Explorer recall prompts David Hamilton San Francisco — The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating a Ford Motor Co. recall of more than a quarter-million Explorer SUVs in the U.S. after receiving complaints about repairs intended to prevent the vehicles from unexpectedly rolling away even while placed in park. The problem, ascribed to fractures of a rear axle mounting bolt that could lead the drive shaft to disconnect, was addressed by a Ford software update designed to apply the electronic parking brake if the drive shaft failed, the agency said. But according to two complaints from vehicle owners, their SUVs behaved erratically following the repair. In one of those cases, the Explorer would reportedly slam to a complete stop at speeds of up to 30 or 40 miles per hour. In the other, it would reportedly lurch into motion while the driver was attempting to disengage the electronic brake. No injuries were reported in these cases, although the first driver reported striking a utility pole when the Explorer started rolling downhill following an abrupt stop, seemingly because the drivetrain was disengaged. The original recall covered certain 2020 through 2022 Explorers with 2.3-liter engines, as well as 3-liter and 3.3-liter hybrids, and the 3-liter ST. Also included were 2020 and 2021 Explorer Police hybrids and those with 3.3-liter gas engines. Both of the reported incidents involved 2021 Explorers. A Ford representative said the company is working with the NHTSA on the matter. |
Unifor kicks off grocery talks By Rosa Saba Unifor says grocery workers have more resolve than ever to achieve higher wages and better working conditions as it heads into a two-year stretch of bargaining for more than a dozen collective agreements. The work will begin with negotiations next week for a contract covering 3,700 Metro workers across the Greater Toronto Area, who — in an unusual move — have already voted 100 per cent in favour of a strike if a deal can’t be reached. The strike vote ahead of bargaining and 100 per cent support for a strike are both rare, said Stephanie Ross, an associate professor in the school of labour studies at McMaster University. “I think that tells you something about the sense of urgency,” said Ross. “People are falling behind every day.” The strike vote sends a strong signal not just to Metro, but to all three grocery giants that their workers are fed up, said Unifor national president Lana Payne. “We need to send a signal and a very serious message to the supermarket barons that workers deserve a piece of these profits, and they deserve to have better pay, better working conditions and more full-time jobs,” she said. “We want to make important gains in this round of bargaining. We feel we’re in a good place to do that.” Unifor represents more than 11,000 grocery store workers at major grocers across Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and Quebec, the union said. Payne said the next collective agreement up for bargaining will be for Loblaw workers in Newfoundland and Labrador this fall. Workers have seen the quality of their jobs erode over time, with inflation eating into their wages even as the grocers post healthy profits, Payne said. The pandemic underscored just how essential grocery store workers are, Payne said, noting that many of them received so-called ‘hero pay’ early on only to have it taken away — something that GTA Metro worker Courtney Cook said “felt like a slap in the face.” “This is our first bargaining since the pandemic,” Cook said. “A lot of things changed during the pandemic, and we were deemed essential workers. So I think everyone’s just frustrated that our pay doesn’t reflect that kind of status.” Unifor held a national strategy session in May to determine its priorities for grocery sector bargaining, said Payne, as the union is hoping to establish a pattern and gain momentum with the first round at Metro. Those priorities include significant pay improvements, greater access to better health benefits, eliminating pay disparities, more full-time work and job protections for workers affected by technological changes, she said. The major grocers have come under public scrutiny as inflation surged across Canada last year, hitting more than eight per cent last June as the cost of basic necessities rose. Executives from the grocers spoke earlier this year in front of a parliamentary committee studying grocery prices, denying accusations that food price inflation was being driven by profit-mongering. But accusations of profiteering aside, the grocers have been posting profits. On Thursday, Empire Company Ltd. reported it earned $182.9 million in its latest quarter compared with $178.5 million a year ago. Loblaw in its latest earnings report reported a profit of $418 million in its first quarter, down from $437 million last year when the company saw a one-time gain from a court ruling. And Metro in its second quarter reported earnings of $218.8 million, up from $198.1 million a year earlier. Unifor is determined to get a bigger slice of that pie for workers, Payne said. “It’s really just hard that we’re putting in everything we have for this company. And we’re not getting back what we feel we deserve,” said Cook. Between the pandemic and the briefness of hero pay, ongoing inflation and grocers’ profits, the grocery sector is in the midst of a “perfect storm,” said Ross, leading to more labour militancy — and not just in the grocery sector. “People are much more willing to hit the bricks than they perhaps have been … in a long time.” Ross said this first round with GTA Metro workers is all-important to set a benchmark for the pattern bargaining approach that Unifor is taking, where it tries to set a standard for one collective agreement and then replicate it across the sector. In addition to better pay, Cook said she wants to see jobs at Metro become more stable, giving workers more predictable hours so they can better prioritize their families and their lives outside of work. She said the 100-per-cent strike vote shows workers are ready to do whatever it takes to get what they deserve, and she thinks grocery store workers across the country will be approaching the bargaining table with the same kind of resolve. Payne thinks the pandemic has also made Canadians more aware of grocery workers and what they face, and that this will translate into public support and sympathy as the workers bargain with grocers. “They risked their health and safety every single day, to go to work for a job that in many cases was not paying them a decent wage,” she said. “Enough is enough here. We have to make good improvements in this collective agreement, and the resolve of our members is very strong. And I think this strike vote clearly shows they’re prepared to fight if they need to.” Ross said recent major strikes have seen record levels of public support for workers in the wake of the pandemic and high inflation. “There’s a much more positive climate of potential public support for the union than there maybe has been in decades,” she said. “But … it all comes down to strategy, how the union and the employer frames their messages and how those messages land with the public.” |
Prominent auto analyst on Jordyn Grzelewski Farmington Hills — Auto analysts at Bank of America feel confident in the likelihood of a United Auto Workers strike of at least one of the Detroit automakers later this year — and they expect the union to secure wage and benefit improvements that result in 25% to 30% higher labor costs for the companies over the four years of the contract. That's according to comments made Wednesday by John Murphy, managing director and lead U.S. auto analyst in equity research at Bank of America, during the financial institution's annual "Car Wars" presentation. The event was hosted by the Automotive Press Association. “I think we’re going to see a strike on Sept. 15," said Murphy. The UAW's current contracts with Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV expire Sept. 14. Talks on a new agreement are slated to start this summer. Murphy said he's highly confident in at least one strike happening, and that the chances of a subsequent strike at one of the other automakers is "much higher than normal." Though he acknowledged there's a case to be made for each of the Detroit automakers to serve as the lead company and strike target in the union's negotiations, Bank of America analysts believe Stellantis will be targeted for a strike, based on rhetoric from UAW President Shawn Fain, who worked for the company and has criticized its idling of an assembly plant in Belvidere, Illinois. Stellantis declined to comment. Murphy contrasted the expected rise in labor costs at the three companies with tailwinds analysts expect the industry to see from declining raw material costs, which he said typically make up about 11% of a vehicle's average transaction price. More recently, raw material costs have stood at about 8% of ATP. "The opposite side of the spectrum is what's happening with labor costs," Murphy said. Murphy noted that labor costs typically make up about 16% of auto companies' operating costs. The increase that his team is expecting would represent about half of the Detroit automakers' current margins, which could be partially offset by the downward movement on raw material costs: “This is going to be a significant structural headwind the industry is going to have to deal with for the next four years," Murphy said. For their part, UAW leaders have pointed to the hefty profits that the automakers have generated in recent years. "They can afford our demands, and we expect them to pony up," Fain said during a recent town hall for UAW members. UAW leaders have repeatedly said the decision on whether to strike will depend on what the Detroit automakers do at the bargaining table. They've said that their top priorities are ending tiered wage and benefit structures, reinstating cost-of-live adjustments, and securing strong job protection language. The union, which is preparing to launch a national contract campaign, heads to the bargaining table with $825 million in its strike fund. Meanwhile, Murphy noted that Bank of America analysts see signs of a more robust recovery in the auto industry than they'd previously expected. They had forecast 14.3 million new-vehicle sales in the United States this year, but the current sales pace is closer to 15.4 million, driven by "significant" recovery in fleet sales to buyers like rental car companies. “This is really important, because when you look at the auto industry, in the U.S. it’s about 4% of GDP. It’s larger in Europe and China," he said. "So if the industry is actually really recovering, it should drag the rest of the economy with it." Inventory is still tight, with about 1.8 million vehicles on dealer lots, but that's up from a pandemic low of 1 million — and Murphy noted that all three Detroit automakers are running at or slightly above normal inventory levels. The annual "Car Wars" report forecasts every product that will launch in the U.S. market over the next four years. Analyst calculate the auto companies' replacement rates, which represents how much of their product portfolio will be replaced with brand-new product over the next four years. That rate trickles down to impact the age of products in showrooms, companies' market share, and their profitability, Murphy explained: “The lower your replacement rate, meaning you have less fresh product, the more market share you lose, and higher your replacement rate is, the more market share you gain.” To that end, automakers are slated to launch an average of 61 new nameplates per year over the next four years, higher than the traditional 41 launches, according to Car Wars. But Murphy noted that much of that is lower-volume products, such as new electric vehicles: “It’s going to be a few tough years here on a lot of product launches and not a lot of payback on volume." Overall, replacement rates will be near the historical average of 15% for model years 2024-25, according to the report, but strengthen in model years 2026-27. Hyundai, Kia and Ford are all well-positioned to gain market share in the next four years because of their higher forecasted replacement rates, according to the report, while Stellantis, Nissan and Honda stand to lose market share to new industry entrants — which could prompt them to cut prices, Murphy said. GM's replacement rate is forecasted to land close to the industry average of 22.8%. Ford's forecasted replacement rate is the highest in the industry, at 24.8%, while Stellantis is at the bottom of the list with a forecasted replacement rate of 15.9%. Analysts also concluded that there are likely to be more last-minute product cancellations in the years ahead amid increased volatility, writing: "The next four+ years could be some of the most uncertain and volatile for product strategy ever." Meanwhile, EVs are taking over as the majority of new nameplates launching over the next four years. As legacy automakers ramp up production of EVs, longtime EV market leader Tesla Inc. is slated to see its market share slip from the 60% range to 18% by 2026, according to Car Wars, while GM and Ford are slated to reach 14% market share by then. Bank of America analysts also noted the dramatic impact of subsidies and consumer incentives included in the Inflation Reduction Act; thanks to the legislation, they expect EVs to reach price parity with internal combustion engine vehicles around 2025. Without the IRA, consumers wouldn't see that until the early 2030s. |
Bill Ford balks at UAW ‘enemy’ Evelyn Blackwell June 21, 2023 Ford employs more UAW members and builds more vehicles in the U.S. than any other automaker — facts executives are quick to tout. “The day that our employees are considered my enemy is the day I’ll retire,” Ford said. “The head of the UAW may consider us his enemy, but I’ll never consider our employees our enemy.” Contracts at Ford, General Motors and Stellantis expire Sept. 14. The union is expected to aggressively push for higher wages, better benefits and more job protections. Ford said he has not yet met with Fain, although he speaks “frequently” with Vice President Chuck Browning, who leads the UAW’s Ford department. He said he’s optimistic both sides will be able to reach an agreement. “I’ve been part of every negotiations since 1982, and the rhetoric around this time of year always heats up,” Ford said. “You just have to fight through all that and say, what are the real issues, where is the common ground, and how can we move forward? And I believe we’ll do that.”
|
The Detroit Three could do more The Detroit News General Motors, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis have spent the last decade swimming in an ocean of cash. Collectively, the Detroit Three have made nearly a quarter of a trillion dollars in profits in North America in the past decade. A quarter of a trillion dollars is a mind-boggling amount of money. Like most working-class people, I have a hard time imagining what it means to have even a billion dollars, much less $250 billion. So here are some ways to help you visualize just how much money the Detroit Three have amassed in profits over the last 10 years. With their quarter of a trillion dollars, the Detroit Three could: Buy every NBA team, every Major League Baseball team and every National Hockey League team and still have enough money left over — about $50 billion — to let fans attend every game for free. Buy the country of Greece (GDP $215 billion) and still have about $35 billion left over. Hire 3.8 million public school teachers — a 100% increase across the country. Fund the entire Apollo program that put a man on the moon. But Detroit Three autoworkers aren’t asking for the moon. We’re asking for a fair deal. With a quarter of a trillion dollars, the Detroit Three can do right by their employees and our communities. In just three months, our contracts covering 150,000 autoworkers at Ford, GM and Stellantis will expire. As we enter negotiations with the Detroit Three, the message from UAW members is clear: After years of cutbacks on wages and benefits, it’s time for autoworkers to get their fair share of these profits. That means we must fight to end tiers, to reinstate a cost-of-living adjustment and to win stronger job protections. We’re done taking cutbacks while the companies rake in the profits. Tiers — where some workers make less in wages and benefits than others working the same job — are the ultimate divide-and-conquer strategy. Tiers violate one of the core principles of unionism — equal pay for equal work — and will no longer be acceptable at the Big Three. We need to lift up the second class of workers who are being denied retiree healthcare and pensions. We can’t have workers waiting nearly a decade to get up to top pay. We need to end the abuse of so-called “temporary” workers and legal schemes like LLCs or joint ventures that undermine the standards that generations of auto workers struggled to win. In 1946 the UAW went on strike against GM, and two years later was the first union to secure a COLA in a union contract. The clause meant that wages would be tied to inflation, so workers wouldn’t be left behind. When inflation took off in the 1970s, the UAW won COLA across all of our employers to ensure that our standard of living didn’t fall behind. Like so many other important gains autoworkers have made over the decades, we lost COLA in 2009 as a result of the auto bankruptcies during the Great Recession. In 2019, we won 6.1% wage increases after 40 days on strike. Inflation has wiped that out, and then some. In three and a half years, inflation is up 18.3%. That’s unacceptable and unsustainable. It’s past time for America’s autoworkers to be made whole. Shawn Fain is president of the United Auto Workers.
|
Can police demand to have
If police knock on your door and ask you to surrender your video doorbell footage, do you have to give it to them? Consumer Reports Dan Wroclawski said legally, the answer is, “No, they can’t.” “If police ask for your footage, you can choose to share it with them or you can simply ignore the request.” A spokesperson for the Toronto Police Service told CTV News Toronto if a home or business has a video doorbell or security camera, police may request for its footage for their investigation, but the property owner does not have to provide it. “The majority of homeowners are cooperative with police and are happy to provide doorbell video, but it’s not mandatory that they have to,” the TPS spokesperson said. However, according to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), if the police really want your video, they can find ways to access it. "You can say no for sure, but police can still produce a warrant to essentially compel the companies to provide the footage from your doorbell without your consent," David Konikoff, Interim Director of the Privacy, Technology and Surveillance program with CCLA told CTV News Toronto. Konikoff said it also depends on what kind of video doorbell you have. "There are lots of different companies that make these doorbells. There is Ring, Eufy, Arlo (and) Google Nest. They all have their own terms and conditions," Konikoff said. Even if you own the doorbell, the CCLA said you may not necessarily own the video, as it could be stored on the cloud or on company servers. If your footage is stored in the cloud or on manufacturers’ servers, police can request it through your video doorbell company. If the footage is stored locally on your system, they may have to come directly to you with a warrant if you refuse to hand it over. |
Electric vehicles' range falls Charles E. Ramirez Electric vehicles lose a significant amount of range when loaded with heavy cargo, according to a new AAA study released Tuesday. An electric pickup truck can lose nearly 25% of its range when hauling loads about 100 pounds less than its maximum capacity, the study said. "Range anxiety remains a top reason consumers are hesitant to switch from gasoline-powered vehicles to EVs," Adrienne Woodland, a AAA spokeswoman, said in a statement. "While this study may heighten concerns, it’s worth remembering that excess weight reduces fuel economy in gas-powered vehicles too." In the study, the auto club's researchers drove a 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck with a 1,400-pound load of sandbags. The load was 110 pounds less than the truck's maximum capacity. Ford Motor Co.'s F-150 Lightning is one of its most popular vehicles. Last week, the company said it's on track to reach its 150,000-unit production goal and its entry-level Pro model is sold out for model year 2023. A Ford spokeswoman wasn't available to immediately comment on the study's findings. AAA's test truck saw its range drop by 24.5% from 278 miles to 210 miles, it said. The test was conducted on a 7.5-mile oval test track and a dynamometer at The Automobile Club of Southern California's Automotive Research Center in Los Angeles. Simply put, extra weight in a vehicle requires more energy for it to move, researchers said. "Our testing revealed a significant range reduction, but it's important to note that the Lightning was loaded to near its maximum capacity," Greg Brannon, director of AAA Automotive Engineering, the auto club's division that conducted the study, said in a statement. "Most buyers will likely use their Lightning with a lighter load, resulting in a much smaller range reduction." In addition to carrying heavy loads, highway driving or permanent loads can also reduce an electric vehicle's range, AAA said. Drivers on highways move at higher speeds and aren't able to take advantage of EVs' technology that captures energy from braking and feeds it into the battery, according to experts. Furthermore, electric vehicles with permanent loads such as equipment racks, built-in equipment trays and toolboxes, will also decrease their range, even without additional cargo. Despite the study's findings, AAA said that electric vehicles remain a viable option for many motorists. "For buyers concerned about range, it's essential to consider the driving they will be doing and choose the right EV for their needs," Woodland said. |
World first: How a 200 mph wind Henry Payne Allen Park — In a long white and blue building behind I-94’s 80-foot-tall Uniroyal tire landmark, cars are traveling at speeds up to 200 mph. While stationary. Ford Motor Co.'s Vehicle Performance and Electrification Center houses the world’s first 200 mph aerodynamic wind tunnel. The state-of-the-art Rolling Road Wind Tunnel — fed by a 26-foot tall, 7,000-horsepower wind turbine — is part of the development of a new generation of Ford vehicles, including the 2024 Mustang. "We spent approximately 250 hours in the wind tunnel developing the new Mustang,” said Mustang and Bronco aerodynamicist Jonathan Gesek. “The aerodynamics of the Mustang Dark Horse have created the most track-capable 5.0-liter Mustang to date.” The industrial facility is long way from the simple aerodynamic tricks featured in the hit "Ford v. Ferrari" movie in which engineers attached flags to cars on test tracks to examine air flow. RRWT brings the track to the car by constructing an enormous donut with a wind turbine on one side and test vehicles strapped down in a test bay on the other. Secured by four, sturdy floor struts that double as data collectors, cars then run on four separate belts under each wheel — or an interchangeable fifth center belt — capable of 200 mph speeds. Aerodynamicists like Gesek then monitor the data on multiple computer screens in a glass-encased control room — hopping back and forth to the wind tunnel to test different aerodynamic features. The Mustang team, for example, developed a handling package for Dark Horse that includes multiple aero mods including a rear wing, rear-wing Gurney flap (named after driver/engineer Dan Gurney, who co-drove the legendary Ford Mk IV to victory at the 1967 Le Mans) and underbody strakes that help suck the pony to the ground. Combined with a remade front air spoiler and splitter, the features create downforce so the pony car can corner faster. Wind tunnels came into common use in the mid-1960s on race cars like Porsches as engineers applied Bernoulli's principle of fluid dynamics used to lift airplanes off the ground — except in reverse. The RRWT is an advance on the last wind tunnel Ford built in 1999 and improves on the 2008-vintage Windshear facility — a 180 mph-capable tunnel in Concord, North Carolina — that has been used to develop NASCAR and IndyCar racers. Gesek said the Mustang uses a wind tunnel perhaps three times more often than a typical sedan. But as Ford develops more electric vehicles, aerodynamics are also key to low wind resistance to deliver better energy efficiency. “We’re using the wind tunnel quite a bit on our commercial vehicles as well as performance cars,” said John Toth, Ford’s North America wind tunnels engineering supervisor. “The amount of air moved by our wind tunnel is enough to fill a K-Class blimp in just over 5 seconds.” Toth said the expense of constructing higher speed tunnels is always a deterrent, but that computer simulators can only go so far. “Computer simulators will get you 90% of the way there,” he said, standing between the blades of the enormous turbine during a rare media tour of the facility. A key benefit of RRWT is its ability to give more accurate data compared to earlier wind tunnel designs — key factors when optimizing for range and efficiency. The turbine was constructed by TLT Turbo in Germany and is driven by a 5.4 megawatt motor. “The closer we can get to reality in the lab, the better and faster we can create more energy-efficient vehicles with great on-road and track stability,” said Toth. Tailored aerodynamics are applied across Ford’s 60-vehicle lineup. For passenger vehicles, the goal is low drag. Performance weapons like Dark Horse, however, balance low drag with increased downforce for high speeds in sweeping corners. The physical forces in the wind tunnel demand high precision and the facility is constructed with that in mind. The nickel-coated turntable, for example, is separated by just 1.5 millimeters from the surrounding floor. The estimated $200 million facility broke ground in 2017, and has been in operation since January 2022. |
Unveiled: Mustang GT3 will
Henry Payne Corvette, Cadillac, Porsche, Ferrari, Aston Martin, Toyota GR. The world’s top performance brands have converged on France this weekend to compete for auto racing’s premier endurance title, the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Next year a pony will join them. Ford unveiled the Mustang GT3 race car Friday for the 2024 race season ahead of the 100th running of Le Mans. Following in the footsteps of Ford’s legendary 1966 GT40 and 2016 GT racers, the GT3 will compete against the world’s top production-based sports-cars at Le Mans next year as well as in other global series. The GT3 represents a triumph of Ford’s product strategy as the Mustang — a key pillar of the Blue Oval’s icon brand strategy along with the F-150 truck and Bronco SUV — has weathered government emissions regulations that have contributed to the demise of muscle car competitors Chevy Camaro and Dodge Challenger. The seventh-generation, 2024 Mustang is due to hit showrooms this fall. “Ford and Le Mans are bound together by history. And now we’re coming back to the most important race in the world,” said Ford CEO Jim Farley, a skilled race driver himself. “It is not Ford versus Ferrari anymore. It is Ford versus everyone. Going back to Le Mans is the beginning of building a global motorsports business with Mustang, just like we are doing with Bronco and Raptor off-road.” Ford is partnering with race chassis manufacturer Multimatic to produce its race car. Multimatic built the Ford GT that won the Le Mans GT class in 2016 on its first try. The Toronto-based race shop also builds the Porsche 963 prototype race car that Bloomfield Hills-based Team Penske has entered this weekend as Chairman Roger Penske tries to add Le Mans to his trophy case filled with 19 Indy 500 wins. Renowned motorsports designer Troy Lee is also a Ford partner, designing the livery for the GT3 debut. Inspired by the new Dark Horse performance model that will debut on the seventh-generation muscle car alongside the traditional Ecoboost and GT models, the Mustang GT3 will carry a ferocious V-8 under the hood. V-8s have been under attack by global emissions regulators, but eight-holers are dominant at Le Mans, powering everything from the Mustang to Penske’s Porsche to the Corvette that took GT-class pole for Saturday’s race start. M-Sport will assemble the race car’s 5.4-liter, so-called Coyote V-8. “For a project like the Mustang GT3, we turned to our most trusted partners in the motorsports world to help bring this vehicle together,” said Ford Performance Motorsports Global Director Mark Rushbrook. The race car bears the signature long hood and fastback of the production car, but is otherwise radically upgraded for the demands of high-speed, high-downforce endurance racing. The carbon-fiber-skinned race car has grown a big wing and diffuser out back, while the front fenders ripple with air vents for aerodynamic downforce. The menacing front end looks like something out of “Mad Max: Fury Road.” The Mustang GT3 represents Ford’s ambitious goal to sell race cars to customers across the world as Porsche has done for years — promising income to a Ford Performance unit that traditionally has been essential to engineering and marketing, not a profit center. The same goes for Chevrolet, which introduced its own, remade Corvette GT3 car at the 24 Hours of Daytona earlier this year with global sales in mind. The Mustang GT3’s first customer is Germany-based Proton Competition, which will campaign a pair of ponies in the 2024 FIA World Endurance Championship. Stateside, Ford Performance will field a two-car factory team in IMSA’s 2024 GTD Pro class. |
Ford on track to produce 150,000 The Detroit News Ford Motor Co. is on track to reach its 150,000-unit production goal on the electric F-150 Lightning this year and giving the largest production increase to the XLT trim customers have been waiting for, the Dearborn automaker said Thursday. Customers wanting the $64,474 Lightning XLT can order one today from a local Ford dealer online or in-store and expect delivery as early as September, the company said. Ford is continuing to accept retail customer orders for the Lariat and Platinum higher-trim models. The entry-level Pro model remains sold out for model year 2023. "Customer interest for XLT has considerably outstripped supply since the F-150 Lightning launch and we’ve worked with our suppliers to help address that,” said Marin Gjaja, Ford Model e chief customer officer, in a statement. “We heard loud and clear from our customers that they want their truck deliveries as close as possible to their orders. As we scale production, we are making this possible.” Thursday's news comes after Ford earlier this year had to halt production and shipments for the electric pickup for more than a month after a battery caught fire on a truck and spread to two others in a holding lot near the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, where the trucks are built. The production stoppage may have put Ford behind on filling orders for the pickup, but the automaker is still ahead of crosstown rival General Motors Co.'s electric Chevrolet Silverado. Production of the Work Truck version of the Silverado EV is supposed to start soon at GM's Factory Zero Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly Center. A $105,000 RST retail version of the truck will launch in the second half of the year. "It's going to be some time in 2024 before GM introduces lower trim levels of the Silverado," said Sam Abuelsamid, principal e-mobility analyst for market research firm Guidehouse Insights. "So now's a good time for Ford to take advantage of that capacity ... build those trucks, get those into customer hands." Ford's electric vehicle sales were down 13% year-over-year in May as the automaker works to increase production of its battery-powered vehicles: the Mustang Mach-E, Lightning and E-Transit. The company expects the results of those efforts will show up in the second half of 2023. Sales were affected by disruptions at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center and at the Mustang Mach-E plant in Mexico, which was also down for several weeks earlier this year. Ford wants to increase production at the Mach-E plant to 130,000 units this year and has steadily done so in the last few months with more than 13,600 units assembled in May. Year to date, the plant has produced more than 33,000 Mach-Es. |
Automakers tell Congress: Riley Beggin Washington — In an era when companies are building driverless cars and 30-inch infotainment screens, the auto industry found itself in Congress on Tuesday fighting over technology that's a little more old school: AM radio. Bipartisan lawmakers are considering requiring automakers to keep AM radio in all new vehicles as some companies — including Tesla Inc., Volkswagen AG, Volvo Cars and BMW AG — are eliminating the frequency from electric vehicles because battery motors interfere with signals. During a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing, the lobbying arm of the U.S. auto industry asked lawmakers not to do that, saying that plenty of technology is available to transmit safety messages, and that mandates could hamper future innovation. That argument was met with united skepticism from both Democrats and Republicans: Lawmakers argued that AM radio is a crucial source for local news and public safety messages in remote areas. "When hurricanes, tornadoes or other natural disasters strike, AM radio remains steadfast, providing vital information to those in affected areas when other communication channels fail," said subcommittee chair Rep. Bob Latta, R-Ohio. Subcommittee ranking member Rep. Doris Matsui, D-California, said "we know AM radio is more than just a lifeline during an emergency. For many, it represents an irreplaceable connection with their community." The electrical components in electric vehicle batteries generate static that makes it harder to receive clear AM radio signals. Some automakers have aimed to minimize that interference, the committee said, while several automakers have opted to eliminate AM radio from new EVs. AM radio frequencies generally have poorer sound quality and are more susceptible to interference than FM radio, but AM can be heard further away from a transmitter than FM. On Tuesday, a representative for automakers said the industry takes "the safety of consumers and the public seriously" but that there is a federal system (the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System, or IPAWS) that provides multiple alert options that will ensure people can get emergency information. "The federal government and industry must work together to modernize IPAWS and continue to incorporate new technologies," said Scott Schmidt, vice president for safety policy at the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. "Doing so will ensure we collectively provide the best, most capable and resilient technologies to the public, also strengthening public safety." He added that there is declining listenership for AM radio: "We are technology agnostic in the sense that we are looking to deliver alerts to our customers as efficiently as possible, as broadly as possible, in the most efficient manner and in a manner that's not going to decline in the future." Michigan Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Ann Arbor, said she's spoken with federal officials about IPAWS' abilities and believes "we are not adequately prepared to reach all Americans in the event of a disaster." The president of a network of radio stations in Indiana and Ohio and an officer from the New Jersey State Police spoke in favor of keeping AM radio. They said AM is the most consistent, dependable platform in case of emergencies. Multiple members raised concerns that automakers may start charging customers for access to AM and FM radio. "The fact that AM is free is something that should cause all of us to sit up and take notice," said Michigan Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Tipton. "This is how people in rural areas like my district get their news. They connect with their religion, they raise money for local causes, they take part in diverse conversations that they might not otherwise have access to." Schmidt said he can only speak to the industry's safety commitment, that automakers will ensure drivers have access to free public alerts and safety warnings. The congressional uproar over AM radio began last month when Latta and 103 other members of Congress sent a letter to automakers that planned to eliminate AM radio, raising concerns about public access to emergency information, particularly in rural areas where internet and cell service is more sparse. Two days later, a bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-New Jersey, introduced the "AM for Every Vehicle Act," which would require the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to mandate that new vehicles come with AM radio at no additional cost. Sens. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, introduced similar legislation in the Senate. Then Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley announced that the company would reverse its April decision to eliminate AM radio in new models beginning next year "after speaking with policy leaders about the importance of AM broadcast radio as a part of the emergency alert system." Latta thanked Ford for that reversal during the hearing Tuesday. Energy and Commerce Chair Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Washington, asked why Ford was able to keep AM radio "with the flip of a switch" while other car companies can't. Schmidt said Ford just disabled the software that receives AM radio as it worked to remove the hardware, so it was able to quickly reverse its plan. |
GM invests in next-gen Kalea Hall General Motors Co. will invest $280 million Canadian at its Oshawa Assembly Plant in Ontario to produce its next-generation internal combustion engine full-size trucks, the Detroit automaker said Tuesday. The announcement comes a day after GM said it would invest more than $1 billion at its Flint facilities, Flint Assembly and Flint Metal Center, for next-generation heavy-duty trucks. Oshawa, a plant where GM halted production in 2019, had its lines restarted in 2021 to support high demand for the company's trucks. The plant makes both light-duty and heavy-duty Chevrolet Silverados and GMC Sierras. Product details and launch timing haven't been released. GM hasn't yet announced an investment for next-generation trucks at its Silao plant in Mexico or the Fort Wayne, Indiana, plant where full-size light-duty trucks also are built. The automaker has sought tax incentives in Fort Wayne. Allen County Council in Fort Wayne recently approved a tax abatement request tied to a $468 million investment in manufacturing equipment at the plant, The Detroit News previously reported. GM on Thursday is planning to have a "positive plant manufacturing announcement" at its Arlington, Texas, plant where full-size SUVs are made. |
Ford tells some Lincoln SUV Associated Press Detroit — Ford is telling owners of more than 140,000 SUVs in the U.S. to park them outside because they can catch fire even when the engine is turned off. The company is recalling certain Lincoln MKC SUVs from the 2015 to 2019 model years. Ford says a short-circuit can develop in the 12-volt battery monitor sensor. It can overheat and cause an engine compartment fire while parked or in motion. Owners are urged to park away from structures until the recall repair is made. The sensors can be damaged when the battery or related electrical parts are serviced. Ford says in documents posted Friday by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it has 19 reports of fires that may be related to the problem in the United States, China and Canada. The company said it's not aware of any injuries. Dealers will add a fuse to the battery monitor sensor power circuit. Owners will be notified by letter starting June 26.
|
Strong truck sales lift Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co.'s sales rose 10.7% year-over-year in May, boosted by strong sales of the automaker's flagship F-Series truck line and amid big gains industrywide. The Dearborn automaker sold 170,933 vehicles in the United States across its Ford and Lincoln brands in May, up from 154,461 in May 2022, according to figures released Friday. Year to date, the company's sales are up 8.8%. Sales were up significantly across the industry in May. American Honda sales were up 58.2% year-over-year; the company that includes the Honda and Acura brands attributed the increase to healthy inventory levels and new products. Hyundai sales were up 18%. Toyota Motor North America reported an increase of more than 6%. Industry data provider Cox Automotive said Friday that initial estimates of May sales indicate results were even stronger than Cox's forecast of 20.3% year-over-year volume growth. "New-vehicle inventory was at a two-year high heading into the month, and some automakers were beginning to turn up the volume on incentives," analysts wrote in a note. "As expected, pent-up demand and improved inventory levels helped drive higher sales volumes. May is often a good month for new-vehicle sales, and May 2023 did not disappoint." Ford's internal combustion engine vehicles, which make up the vast majority of its sales, were up 11.1% in May, while hybrid vehicle sales rose 20.5%. Ford's electric vehicle sales were down 13% year-over-year as the automaker works to ramp up production at the plants that make the Mustang Mach-E and the F-150 Lightning. The company said it expects to see the results of those efforts show up in results in the second half of the year. Mach-E production was down at Ford's Cuautitlan plant in Mexico for several weeks earlier this year while the company prepared to increase production there to 130,000 units this year. Mach-E output has risen steadily the last few months, according to production data released Friday, with more than 13,600 units assembled in May. Year to date, the plant has produced more than 33,000 Mach-Es. Trucks were a point of strength for the Blue Oval in May, with sales up 31.6% to more than 98,000 units. Driving that strong performance was the F-Series, which posted a 42.7% year-over-year gain. Sales of the F-150 soared nearly 50%, while the redesigned Super Duty that recently launched saw sales grow 33.9% in May. Sales of the electric F-150 Lightning totaled 1,707 for the month. Meanwhile, in the SUV segment, sales were down nearly 10% in May. Results for Ford brand SUVs were down for the EcoSport, Bronco, Mach-E, Edge and Explorer. Sales of the Bronco Sport, redesigned Escape and Expedition were up. Ford's luxury Lincoln brand posted a 14.4% sales decline for the month. |
Ford EVs to get access to Tesla Jordyn Grzelewski Two auto industry heavyweights and competitors are teaming up to expand access to electric-vehicle charging in North America. Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley and Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk on Thursday announced that, starting next year, Ford's EVs will gain access to Tesla's proprietary Supercharger network. They shared the news during a live event on Twitter Spaces; Musk also owns Twitter. With Ford customers gaining access to more than 12,000 Superchargers, the agreement will more than double the number of EV fast chargers to which they currently have access. "We're ramping production and we think this a huge move for our industry and for our all-electric customers," Farley said. "Widespread access to fast-charging is absolutely vital to our growth as an EV brand." "We don't want the Tesla Supercharger network to be like a walled garden," Musk said. "We want it to be something that is supportive of electrification and sustainable transport in general. ... It is our intent to do everything possible to support Ford and have Ford be on an equal footing at Tesla Superchargers." Here's how the arrangement will work for customers: Starting next year, a Tesla-developed adapter will provide drivers of Ford EVs fitted with a Combined Charging System (CCS) port access to Tesla's V3 Superchargers, according to a news release. Starting in 2025, when it's set to launch its second generation of electric vehicles, Ford will equip its EVs with the NACS charge port that Tesla vehicles have, eliminating the need for an adapter. Currently, Ford's charging network has some 84,000 chargers, including more than 10,000 public fast chargers, according to the company. Ford also is in the midst of an initiative under which its dealers are adding about 1,800 public fast chargers at their stores. In a statement, Marin Gjaja, chief customer officer for Ford's EV business unit, said that Tesla's charging network "has excellent reliability and the NACS plug is smaller and lighter. Overall, this provides a superior experience for customers.” Farley hinted at the move during an event earlier Thursday with Morgan Stanley, where he talked about there being "room for some collaboration between the auto companies — which is totally unnatural for us." "Right now we have two different plugs," he said, referring to the "North American Charging Standard (NACS) connector that Tesla uses versus another standard, CCS, used by other manufacturers. "They're completely different," Farley said. "It seems totally ridiculous that we have an infrastructure problem and we can't even agree on what plug to use." During the Twitter Spaces event, Musk said he believes that "consumers will be all the better for it" if NACS becomes the standard. "This was a no brainer move for Farley and (Ford) needed to partner with Tesla to expand its charging ecosystem," Dan Ives, an equity analyst at Wedbush Securities who follows both companies, said via email. "A strategic step forward for Ford to go after its EV vision as Tesla holds most of the cards with its supercharger network. Many thought this day would never happen." Ford's stock was trading up about 1% after hours to $11.49 per share. Tesla's stock was trading up less than 1% to $184.83 per share |
'Pony up:' UAW leadership Jordyn Grzelewski The United Auto Workers' bargaining strategy for upcoming contract talks with the Detroit automakers came into sharper focus Wednesday as union leaders spelled out their top priorities. They are: ending tiered wage and benefit structures; reinstating cost-of-living adjustments; and securing stronger job protections. The UAW's top five leaders detailed those goals during a union-wide town hall Wednesday on Facebook Live. “These companies have been extraordinarily profitable, and our members have created incredible value for these companies during some really hard and dangerous years," said UAW President Shawn Fain. "They can afford our demands, and we expect them to pony up.” Contract negotiations between the UAW and Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV are slated to kick off in the coming months ahead of the Sept. 14 expiration of the previous four-year agreements. The stakes are high for all parties, as the negotiations will play a crucial role in the industry's shift to electric vehicles. The goals mentioned by UAW leaders were spot on for Ryan Ashley, an engine assembly technician at Ford's Cleveland Engine Plant. “I'm looking forward to eliminating tiers, getting back COLA and then making some sort of progress towards retiree health care and then pensions,” he said. Ashley, a member of Local 1250 with four years in at the Ford plant, is prepared to go on strike: “If we want to get all those concessions back, we will have to go on strike." Union leaders on Wednesday reiterated a longstanding point of contention for the UAW and its members: tiered wage and benefit systems that often include years-long progression periods before members reach the top of wage scales. They argued that the cost-of-living adjustments the UAW first won in the 1940s, but which autoworkers lost during the Great Recession, are a must amid high inflation. Inflation in the United States peaked in June 2022 at 9.1% — the highest it has been since 1981. They also pointed to plant closures by all three automakers in recent years, even as the companies have generated record profits. In 2022, GM, Stellantis and Ford reported adjusted operating income in North America, respectively, of $13 billion, $15.2 billion and $9.2 billion. “We know what the companies are going to say when we go into bargaining. ... They’re going to say that our demands are unrealistic. They’re going to say that they’re worried about the rising interest rates and a looming recession. They’re going to say they can’t afford our demands because the transformation towards an electric future requires massive investments," said Fain. "To that we say: 'We took concessions in hard times. ... Business has been booming for the last decade, and these companies have made record profits. And this is our time to get our fair share of the pie.'” As for the prospects of a strike, UAW Secretary-Treasurer Margaret Mock said that will depend on what happens at the bargaining table. She pointed to the financial impact on GM of the UAW's 40-day strike of the Detroit automaker in 2019 — $3 billion — and to the UAW's $825 million strike fund. "We will go the distance to win what we deserve," she said, "even if it means staying out." Union leaders also promised greater transparency during bargaining than in previous cycles, vowing to send out regular updates to the membership and have more town halls. They also urged members to prepare at the local level and said the UAW would be organizing national days of action at plants across the United States as part of a national contract campaign. Rob Pacheco, a member of Local 31 out of GM’s Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City, Kansas, said what was highlighted at the town hall was “a reflection of what's coming off the floor.” “I don't know a single autoworker that doesn't say those things every time we sit at the break table,” he said. Pacheco, who’s been an autoworker for 26 years, expects the UAW to be able to make some gains during negotiations this year. And the automakers giving back COLA “wouldn't even scratch a dent in corporate profits,” he said. “They can cry poor and say they don't know what the economy is going to be but we didn't know what the economy was going to be 10 years ago, and then five years after that," he said. "But I do know that it takes me longer hours and more days to put milk and bread on my table.” |
Time to end violations of If you’re covered by OHIP, all medically necessary hospital and physician services must be provided without extra user charges. By Natalie Mehra Last month, a friend was told by his doctor it would take a year to have a colonoscopy performed in his local hospital. (A highly dubious claim.) Then, he was told he could have it done in the same physician’s private clinic faster … if he pays $75. That is an outright violation of the Canada Health Act. A Toronto woman wrote on May 7: “I just had cataract surgery at a private clinic. I was not warned until I got to the doctor’s office that it would cost me just under $2,000. I asked the referring ophthalmologist why I was charged so much. She said I could have asked to waive the fees. But I was not offered that by the doctor who performed the cataract surgery.” Last week, a man in Southwestern Ontario told me he has to pay for laser cataract surgery because it isn’t covered by OHIP. (It is.) When Premier Doug Ford announced plans to expand private clinics, he promised patients would never have to pay with their credit card. Yet, existing private clinics in Ontario, already force — or manipulate — patients into paying outrageous extra costs. And the clinics are extra-billing with impunity. The Ford government used its majority to pass Bill 60 earlier this month. This new law expressly enables the transfer of surgeries and diagnostics from public hospitals to for-profit clinics. It puts foundational principles of our public health system — that people get care based on need, not wealth — in real and urgent danger. Patients need to know two things: First, patients have a “Bill of Rights” under the Canada Health Act. If you’re covered by OHIP, all medically necessary hospital and physician services — including cataract surgeries, colonoscopies and MRIs — must be provided without extra user charges, whether in a public hospital or private clinic. To be clear: No amount can be charged to a patient for medically necessary lenses and eye tests, nor for the premises, equipment or personnel. Second, private clinics generate profit from “upselling” to patients — pushing a dizzying array of add-ons that are medically unnecessary. Bill 60 does not ban this practice. Shockingly, it actually invites the new private clinics to lay out their plans for upselling to the government. If they are not stopped, can anyone doubt it’s only a matter of time until we’re being manipulated into paying thousands of dollars for “extra-special” joint replacements and more? What is most appalling is that this privatization puts our public health care at risk for no reason. We categorically do not need private clinics to cut surgical wait times. Virtually every public hospital has operating rooms that are closed evenings, overnight and on weekends. They should be funded and staffed to open to full capacity to clear backlogs. Lest anyone believe we can’t afford it, Ontario funds its hospitals at the lowest rate in Canada. Our public hospitals have been developed over a hundred years. Communities built hospitals to care for victims of the Spanish influenza pandemic of 1918-20. Veteran’s memorial hospitals were built after the world wars. Over generations, Ontarians volunteered, fundraised and built our hospitals. They are ours: our public assets, our inheritance, our legacy. With no democratic mandate whatsoever, sixty-eight MPPs voted to pass Bill 60, privatizing the core of our public hospitals. In response, the Ontario Health Coalition is organizing a massive volunteer-run referendum. More than 150,000 people have already voted online and in advance polls. Community votes across Ontario will be held outside local businesses and public spaces on Friday and Saturday. When governments take away our democracy and threaten what is ours, we have to find ways to empower people to have their voices heard. And, if we speak in large enough numbers, the Ford government will ultimately have to listen.
|
Talks stall as Trudeau and Ford’s One highly placed source told the Star the latest proposal is more than the initial $1-billion contribution that the federal and provincial governments had promised Stellantis to construct a facility that would make 400,000 batteries a year. By Tonda MacCharlesOttawa Bureau Chief Weeks of crisis talks to keep Stellantis from moving a massive EV battery plant out of Canada are at an impasse as Ottawa’s latest offer falls short of what the company wants, the Star has learned. The Trudeau government has proposed to spend billions more as part of a package for Stellantis — parent company of Chrysler, Jeep and Fiat — to convince the company to restart construction on a $5-billion electric vehicle battery factory in Windsor, halted nearly two weeks ago. One highly placed source told the Star the latest proposal is more than the initial $1-billion contribution the federal and provincial governments had promised Stellantis to construct a facility that would make 400,000 batteries a year. But the insider, who spoke on a background basis to protect ongoing sensitive negotiations, warned the money would not be enough for the joint venture formed by Stellantis and its Korea-based partner LG Energy Solution to retain all of the planned battery factory in Canada. That’s because of the richer subsidies available in the U.S. thanks to President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which gives companies massive payouts for green manufacturing. The current Canadian offer could help bankroll production of battery cells here, but it wouldn’t cover the modules that contain the battery cells, the source said. It remains uncertain whether some or all of the manufacturing proposed for the Windsor plant, which is slated to employ 2,500, could be relocated to the U.S. Neither the company nor government officials at Queen’s Park would comment Friday. Have talks broken down? In Ottawa, Adrienne Vaupshas, a spokesperson for Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, said only that “conversations are ongoing and we remain confident we will reach a deal that is in the best interests of Canadians. We are working closely with both the Ontario provincial government and with Stellantis.” “The Canadian auto sector is very important to the Canadian economy and the thousands of Canadians whose livelihoods depend on it,” Vaupshas said. Stellantis Canada spokesperson LouAnn Gosselin said only: “We are not commenting at this time.” Talks directed by the federal government and Stellantis, which has taken the lead on negotiations for the joint venture, continued “actively” all week as Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne was in B.C. and flying back to Ottawa Friday, his office said. Premier Doug Ford said his government had increased its initial contribution of a $500-million subsidy to the auto giant, but has declined to discuss specific subsidies on offer. Speaking to reporters Wednesday at an auto parts factory in London, the premier emphasized the importance of the sector to Ontario’s economy. “The future is electric and we’re leading the charge. Over the past two-and-a-half years, we’ve attracted over $25 billion in auto and EV battery investment, including, most recently, Volkswagen’s $7-billion investment to build its first overseas EV battery manufacturing facility here in St. Thomas,” said Ford. “These are game-changing investments that are creating new jobs, better jobs, better paycheques across the auto supply chain and driving economic growth,” he said. Brampton plant could be next But Ford sounded a note of frustration at the pace of talks in the Stellantis situation, suggesting the ball is in Ottawa’s court. “We’re waiting for the federal government to finish off the deal. As you know, we put in our fair share and now we’re stepping up again — to put in more money,” the premier said. There are also concerns at Queen’s Park that the huge Stellantis plant in Brampton could be collateral damage if the automaker moves more production stateside. A source close to Stellantis noted the company has not yet revealed a future EV product for Brampton, where the gasoline-powered Chrysler 300, the Dodge Charger and the Dodge Challenger have been made for years. The federal government never publicly confirmed its original $500-million contribution to Stellantis-LG Energy Solution in March 2022, citing commercial sensitivities around other negotiations that were on at the time. However, after the introduction last August of the Biden administration’s $369-billion (US) package subsidies to attract “green” technology investments to America, Stellantis quickly sought more financial incentives from Canada. Stellantis shut down construction on the plant three days after the Star revealed on May 12 that the project was in jeopardy if the pot wasn’t sweetened. Champagne and Freeland have said Canada would not match dollar-for-dollar American production subsidies, but would support strategically important projects via investment tax credits to spur capital outlays by companies to start projects here. U.S. money has changed things Last week, Champagne stressed Ottawa wants to keep the Stellantis investment in Windsor, but at the same time Freeland said the company must be “reasonable” in its demands because federal resources are not “infinite.” Both have publicly lobbied the province to spend more, citing regional “fairness” given Ontario will get the most benefit from the project. As Champagne and Freeland pursued additional cash from the Ford government, they have tried to keep talks under wraps, insisting they will not negotiate in public. Those talks heated up this spring after German auto giant Volkswagen said it struck a deal with the federal government to locate a new EV battery-making plant in St. Thomas. It is another massive “gigafactory” that will ultimately produce up to one million electric car batteries a year, more than twice what the Stellantis plant is aiming to produce. When the details were revealed in April, Ottawa admitted it had offered VW matching U.S.-style production credits of up to $13.2 billion — far higher than the $1 billion in aid originally announced for the Stellantis EV battery plant in March 2022. In a letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, first reported by the Star, Stellantis demanded Ottawa respect what the company said was a written promise to match production subsidies for the Windsor plant, too. |
Ford's Farley: 'We see the Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley is looking further afield than the Dearborn automaker's traditional rivals as the company charts a future defined by electric, digitally-connected vehicles: namely, to China. “We see the Chinese as the main competitor, not GM or Toyota," said Farley, speaking at a Morgan Stanley conference Thursday. The comment came in response to a question about how Ford can preserve its current strategy of focusing on the segments where it's most successful, in the context of an increasingly competitive landscape and as Chinese automakers make significant gains. “As far as the Chinese (are) concerned, it’s going to be really humbling. They produce 70% of the electric vehicles in the world in China," Farley said. "The Chinese are going to be the powerhouse, we think. To beat them, you either have to have a very distinct brand — which we think we do, by leaning into our icons — or you have to beat them on cost. But how do you beat them on cost if their scale is five times yours?" Farley pointed to Chinese competitors like SAIC Motor, Great Wall Motor and Geely — but the one he's watching the closest is BYD Auto, the company that this year ascended to China's top-selling auto brand and which is vying with Tesla Inc. for the title of the world's biggest electric-vehicle maker. Farley noted BYD's massive scale, investments in lithium iron phosphate battery chemistry and its high levels of vertical integration. “I like BYD. Totally vertically-integrated, aggressive, unapologetic," he said. "Very, very impressive company." With China now holding the title of the world's largest auto exporter and as the country maintains dominance over EV battery technology, Farley said the United States has a decision to make, even amid high geopolitical tensions: “If localizing their (battery) technology in the U.S. gets caught up in politics, the customer’s really going to get screwed. So we have to work through that in this country.” Detroit's automakers have been reassessing their strategies in China amid rapidly increasing competition from domestic manufacturers there that are leading the way on electrification and offering high-quality, affordably-priced EVs. The stakes are high, as China is not only the world's largest auto market, but the top EV market in the world. Ford, which has a market share of about 2% in China, recently said it was moving to a "leaner" model there, including a focus on exports and on areas of strength such as commercial vehicles. And while rival General Motors Co. has a larger business there, executives there have also acknowledged challenges amid years-long sales declines. Stellantis NV is opting for an "asset-light" approach in China. "We're not going to try to serve everyone," Farley said earlier this month. "It'll be a lower investment, leaner, much more focused business in China, and we're going to have a team on the ground that will be global resources for the company, because of how important the market is in EV." That reassessment also includes reported job cuts. The market fluctuations in a country once dominated by foreign auto brands can be explained in large part by Chinese consumers' rapid adoption of electric vehicles. More than a quarter of passenger vehicles sales in China were electric last year, and the vast majority of those EVs were produced by domestic manufacturers. Farley's comments Thursday about the competitive cost structure Chinese automakers are establishing echoed similar remarks Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares made recently. “Now we have the problem of affordability, and we have our Chinese competitors that are going to challenge us with a very different cost structure," Tavares said. "We are challenged by our Chinese competitors. They have done the job. So, the question for Europe is very important: Is the only way to compete with our Chinese competitors to use the same cost structure, or can we find another way to compete with them? That is the 1 million euro question.” Meanwhile, Ford recently has been embroiled in political backlash over its planned use of Chinese technology at a forthcoming $3.5 billion battery plant in Marshall. The Dearborn automaker is establishing the first automaker-backed LFP battery plant in the United States. The operation is slated to open in 2026 and to create about 2,500 jobs. Ford will own the property, employ the workforce and operate the plant. It will license battery technology from China-based Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., or CATL, an arrangement that does not involve a joint venture or cross shareholdings but which nonetheless has drawn intense criticism from Republican lawmakers. Ford officials have pointed out that many EV batteries are imported from China, and that CATL will not receive U.S. tax dollars for the Marshall plant. Ford's stock closed up 0.4% to $11.38 per share Thursday afternoon. |
Ford’s new three-row crossover By Gene Pereira May 27, 2023 A three-row EV crossover is coming to Ford’s Oakville plant in the near future. Ford CEO Jim Farley made the announcement earlier this month at the auto company’s investor day stating that with the two-row crossover field packed with competitors, the company will need to compete elsewhere as well. Aimed to help boost up their EV division, three-row EV crossover from Ford will be built in Oakville and is expected to reach dealerships in 2025. “In contrast to two-row crossovers that we believe will be a very saturated market, we believe Model E can be highly differentiated in markets where we know the customer well, like the three-row utility space,” said Farley, in a quarterly financial call earlier this month. “A lot of new customers bought a Lightning that never owned a pickup truck before. And we intend to do that with a three-row crossover and with a bunch of EV Pro vehicles.” Some of the details of the new vehicle were shared at the investor event by Doug Field, Ford’s chief advanced product development and technical officer. The three-row crossover, which will have enough space for at least seven passengers and be similar in size to the Ford Explorer, will have over 563 km/h of range, with the ability to add over 241 km/h of range in just a 10-minute charging stop. While exact pricing on the new vehicle has yet to be released, Ford said it will be affordable. |
Ford reverses course, will keep Tom Krisher and Wyatte Grantham-Philips Detroit — Owners of new Ford vehicles will be able to tune in to AM radio in their cars, trucks and SUVs after all. Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley wrote in social media postings Tuesday that the company is reversing a decision to scrub the band after speaking with government policy leaders who are concerned about keeping emergency alerts that often are sounded on AM stations. “We've decided to include it on all 2024 Ford and Lincoln vehicles," Farley wrote on LinkedIn and Twitter. "For any owners of Ford's EVs without AM broadcast capability, we'll offer a software update” to restore it. The move comes after a bipartisan group of federal lawmakers introduced a bill Wednesday calling on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require AM in new vehicles at no additional cost. Sponsors of the “AM for Every Vehicle Act” cited public safety concerns, noting AM's historic role in transmitting vital information during emergencies, such as natural disasters, especially to rural areas. Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., one of the bill’s sponsors, said eight of 20 major automakers including Ford, BMW AG and Tesla Inc. have pulled the band from new vehicles. Ford removed AM from the 2023 Mustang Mach-e and F-150 Lightning electric pickups after data collected from vehicles showed that less than 5% of customers listened to it, spokesman Alan Hall said. Electrical interference and reducing cost and manufacturing complexity also played a role. The company also took it out of the 2024 gasoline-powered Mustang, but will add it back in before any of the muscle cars are delivered, Hall said. The EVs will get an online software update to put AM back into the vehicles, and Ford will keep including it in future vehicles as it looks at innovative ways to deliver emergency alerts, Hall said. Ford and others also suggested that internet radio or other communication tools could replace AM radio. But Markey and others pointed to situations where drivers might not have internet access. The Federal Communications Commission and National Association of Broadcasters praised the legislation, which is also backed by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J.; Rep. Tom Kean, Jr., R-N.J., and Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., among others. But the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a U.S. trade group that represents major automakers including Ford and BMW, criticized the bill, calling the AM radio mandate unnecessary. The trade group pointed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Integrated Public Alerts and Warning System, which can distribute safety warnings across AM, FM, internet-based and satellite radios — as well as over cellular networks. The alliance said the bill gives preference to a technology that's competing with other communications options. Messages were left Tuesday seeking comment from BMW and Tesla. According to the National Association of Broadcasters and Nielsen data, more than 80 million people in the United States listen to AM radio every month. |
Ford strikes lithium deals to Keith Naughton, David Stringer and Matthew Miller Ford Motor Co. reached a series of deals to buy lithium from projects in Canada to Chile, as automakers rush to secure the materials needed to build electric vehicles. Ford has struck deals with Albemarle, the world's top producer, Chile's SQM and Canada's Nemaska Lithium, according to separate announcements Monday. The deals come ahead of the second day of an investor event focused on Ford's $50 billion plan for electric models. The agreements will look to take advantage of President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which contains incentives for battery manufacturing and sourcing of materials from the United States and its allies. The availability and cost of crucial battery materials, including nickel and cobalt, have been key concerns for years among EV makers trying to build out their electric lineups. The issue has gained more urgency in recent months due to rising competition to strike supply pacts with miners and project developers and by wild swings in raw material costs. Processing is the "limiting factor," said Ford Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley. "The mining part is not the constraint. It's really the processing," Farley said Monday in an interview on Bloomberg Television. "So turning those raw materials, especially lithium and nickel, into processed materials we can put into a slurry to make the cells themselves." This is the second time in less than a year that Ford has announced direct deals with battery metals producers, following a series of agreements announced in July. The latest pacts include: -Albemarle supplying more than 100,000 metric tons of battery-grade lithium hydroxide for about 3 million Ford EV batteries starting in 2026, and continuing through 2030 -SQM ensuring supply of battery-grade lithium carbonate and hydroxide that will help Ford vehicles qualify for consumer tax credits included in the Inflation Reduction Act -Canada's Nemaska Lithium delivering as much as 13,000 tons of lithium hydroxide per year, with Ford becoming the first customer of the company backed by Quebec's government and Livent, the world's third-largest lithium producer -EnergySource Minerals and Compass Minerals supplying lithium products they expect to produce in California and Utah, respectively, starting in 2025 Ford appeared to be lagging competitors in terms of lithium supply, despite signing an off-take agreement last year with Liontown Resources, David Deckelbaum, a TD Cowen analyst, said in a note. The flurry of deals announced Monday put it "well ahead" of most auto manufacturers, he wrote, and highlights what will be the most likely path that companies take to secure supply, as opposed to mergers and acquisitions. Ford is staging a two-day event in Dearborn this week to persuade investors on the merits of its plans for a 16-fold increase in EV production in the span of just a few years. The company is "pretty much done" locking up the mining capacity needed to reach its 2026 production goal, Farley said. The CEO noted the processing constraints Ford is facing are partly political. The Biden administration is coaxing companies to depend less on China by making EV incentives subject to requirements that components and materials are sourced from North America and U.S. free-trade partners. "On-shoring the processing is going to be the most important controller of cost and also politics," Farley said. "Eighty percent of the processing for nickel and lithium are being done in China, and we need to localize that." |
Canadian autoworkers union Breana Noble The labor union representing Canadian autoworkers last Thursday that pensions, higher wages and job security in the shift to producing electric vehicles are the priorities at the bargaining table this year with Detroit's three automakers. Delegates from Unifor's locals met for the union's Special Auto Council on Wednesday and Thursday in London, Ontario, to discuss proposed resolutions and priorities for the "most closely watched and highly anticipated rounds of Detroit Three bargaining that we've seen in a long time," Unifor National President Lana Payne said in a statement. Those will kick off in August. It'll be the first time in years the Canadian union representing 20,000 autoworkers will be negotiating with General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV at the same time as the United Auto Workers, which have signaled similar expectations. Delegates raised concerns over inflation, temporary layoffs as automakers retool plants for EVs, hiring and retention challenges and the unionization of new EV facilities. “We are in an extraordinary time in the sector, with thousands of members bracing for a transition to electric vehicles,” James Stewart, Unifor's master bargaining chair for Stellantis, said in a statement. “One of our primary priorities in addition to pensions and wages will be to secure details of these investment commitments including specific product allocation, transition timeline and income security protections during the transition.” Stellantis' decision on Monday to pause construction of an EV battery module assembly facility it owns with LG Energy Solution in Windsor, Ontario, over a disagreement on what the Canadian government has committed to provide in tax credits, shows what is at stake in the EV transformation as automakers seek cost reductions to produce more-expensive EVs. Payne told The Detroit News on Wednesday that she fears losing the battery plant could risk other investments from Stellantis in the country that is seeking to win back auto investments lost in recent decades. "There is quite frankly too much at stake," Payne said about the situation with the Windsor module plant, where 300 jobs are at stake. "This company is hard bargaining. We understand hard bargaining with this company. That is the situation we're in." If Stellantis does stick to building the $3.7 billion battery plant, Unifor would look to organize the plant, putting it in a similar situation as the UAW that has called for workers at these joint-venture battery plants to be included in the union's master agreements, the contracts that promise top wages, health care and other benefits for seniority assembly and traditional powertrain workers. Currently, a contract for the only organized JV battery plant, in Warren, Ohio, is being negotiated separately with Ultium LLC, the partnership between GM and LGES. Workers there start at $16.50 per hour, about half of what traditional seniority autoworkers make. “It is important that auto manufacturing jobs continue to be family and community supporting jobs, with solid, stable pensions and strong wages,” Jason Gale, Unifor's master bargaining chair for GM, said in a statement. “Our members have been very clear with us that pensions and wage improvements form the core of our bargaining proposals.” |
Unifor Auto Council determines
May 21, 2023 LONDON—Pensions, wages, transition plans as autoworkers shift to producing electric vehicles, and confirmation of new investment and product lines emerged as the bargaining priorities at the Unifor Special Auto Council, as the union prepares for upcoming negotiations with the Detroit Three automakers (Ford, General Motors and Stellantis). “This is going to be a big year. One of the most closely watched and highly anticipated rounds of Detroit Three bargaining that we’ve seen in a long time,” said Lana Payne, Unifor National President. “The Auto Council has worked to identify our key, overarching priorities amid hundreds of specific proposals put forward by our members to set our strategic course. Our members expect us to deliver and they deserve it.” During Special Auto Council, delegates raised concerns including rising inflation, income security during retooling for EV production, hiring and retention challenges including for Skilled Trades and the unionization of new EV facilities, among others. Contract negotiations for the union’s 20,000 auto sector members at the D3 will get underway in August 2023. The Unifor collective agreement covers members working at auto assembly plants, powertrain facilities, casting and stamping operations, parts distribution centres, office and clerical workers, as well as fire and security units. Unifor’s Special Auto Council, held May 17-18 in London, Ont., brought together active and retired members from Ford, GM and Stellantis to prioritize the demands that will be brought to the table. Analysis of the sector’s economic forecast, current Canadian manufacturing footprint, and member pension plans informed the conversation. “Inclusion is very important when it comes to bargaining,” said John D’Agnolo, Unifor Auto Council Chair and Ford Master Bargaining Chair. “Our bargaining process includes members from the beginning and at the end they get to vote on it, so throughout the whole process they get to see it. It’s the democratic way.” Unifor has not yet announced which company it will select to set the contract pattern for the remaining rounds of bargaining with the other companies. “We are in an extraordinary time in the sector, with thousands of members bracing for a transition to electric vehicles,” said James Stewart, Stellantis Master Bargaining Chair. “One of our primary priorities in addition to pensions and wages will be to secure details of these investment commitments including specific product allocation, transition timeline and income security protections during the transition.” As workers face rising interest rates and record inflation, pensions and wages are top of mind for members. “It is important that auto manufacturing jobs continue to be family and community supporting jobs, with solid, stable pensions and strong wages,” said Jason Gale, GM Master Bargaining Chair. “Our members have been very clear with us that pensions and wage improvements form the core of our bargaining proposals.” Unifor previously unveiled its set of 29 recommendations for governments and automakers in its auto policy document, Navigating the Road Ahead: Rebuilding Canada’s powerhouse auto sector. “We are the ones most vested in this industry’s success. We are its most vocal advocate and its strongest champion,” said Payne. “One thing is for certain with our union: once we decide on a goal, we don’t waver. We are relentless and determined.” |
Automaker set to 'pull the plug' Dave Waddell WINDSOR – Auto giant Stellantis and its LG Energy partner are preparing to shut down entirely construction of its planned electric-vehicle battery plant here amid a funding impasse with the federal government, sources say. The automaker, whose brands include Chrysler, is also believed to be reviewing its entire Canadian footprint, perhaps imperiling the Stellantis production facility in Brampton over an apparent delay by the federal government in signing a final pact to help fund the multi-billion-dollar project in Windsor. The company’s entire electric-vehicle program in Canada could be at risk, one source said. “They’re not bluffing. They’re prepared to pull the plug on the battery plant.” Contacted Wednesday, a spokeswoman for Stellantis would not specifically address whether the Windsor construction site was facing an imminent shutdown. “Stellantis and LG Energy Solution simply ask that the Canadian government keep its commitments in relation to what was agreed last February and which led us to continue construction work of the gigafactory in Windsor,” LouAnn Gosselin said. “This uncertainty is unfair to our Canadian employees, as well as towards Stellantis and LGES investments.” Stellantis had previously announced it would bring electric vehicle production to Brampton. But the company hasn’t announced anything to replace the current vehicles produced there, the Dodge Challenger and Charger, which were originally believed headed to Windsor in a new electric version. The Chrysler 300 is also produced in Brampton, but it is being phased out after this year’s model run. Stellantis has its Canadian headquarters in Windsor and the local assembly plant is its sole source of minivan production. It’s scheduled for a retooling to accommodate electric vehicle production, but the start date has been pushed back from the original early June start to later in the summer. The existing Windsor plant isn’t in danger, sources said. Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares and LG Energy Solution CEO Young Soo Kwon warned of the possible implications of not finalizing a new financial agreement in an April 19 letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The letter, excerpts of which were published in the Toronto Star, urged the government to act on numerous funding promises. “Continued delay in executing this agreement is bringing significant risk to the project,” the CEOs wrote. Talks between the two sides have been ongoing since last August after the American Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) bill was passed, but a senior official for one of the companies confirmed Tuesday night the federal government still hasn’t signed off on any of the subsidies. LG and Stellantis are seeking a package competitive with the $45/Kwh subsidy offered in the U.S. bill – which was the basis for the $13 billion in incentives Volkswagen may get for locating an electric-vehicle battery plant in St. Thomas. Currently, Stellantis/LG have halted construction on just the module portion of the Windsor battery plant while discussions continue. Production has been scheduled to start early in 2024 with a plan to produce 400,000 electric-vehicle batteries annually. With other battery companies also looking at locating in Canada – Quebec being a likely location – industry observers are sensing the federal government is looking to set a precedent now to involve provincial governments in the subsidies. This week, the federal government began publicly prodding its Ontario counterpart to pony up more provincial financial support. “The feds are saying we’re heavily committed to the province (of Ontario),” said Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association president Flavio Volpe. “There are other provinces saying there’s more than automotive in Ontario.” To date, the province has claimed it doesn’t have the financial wherewithal to compete against the U.S. government’s subsidy package. Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland has said she’s “absolutely confident” the Windsor deal will be completed, though she added: “But I also want to point out that the resources of the federal government are not infinite. We are counting on Ontario to do its fair share and we’re counting on Stellantis to be reasonable |
Ford posts April sales gain Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose 4% year-over-year in April, bolstered by strong results in the truck segment. The Dearborn automaker sold 184,002 vehicles in the United States last month. Sales of internal combustion engine vehicles were up 5.6%, while hybrid vehicle sales slipped 6.9% and electric-vehicle sales fell 25% as the automaker continued to feel the impact of production downtime at two of its key EV plants. Ford reported the results Wednesday after its quarterly earnings report Tuesday. The automaker posted $1.8 billion in profits on $41.5 billion in the first quarter. Executives said the solid financial results were bolstered by higher sales and volumes in the first three months of the year. The Blue Oval's April sales results were consistent with industrywide gains recorded in April. Industry data provider Cox Automotive reported Wednesday that new-vehicle sales likely finished higher than its analysts' forecast of an annual sales pace of 15.1 million sales, "fed by higher inventory levels and a healthy dose of fleet deliveries." Initial estimates, according to Cox, indicate the pace was close to 15.9 million sales. Honda, Hyundai, Kia and Subaru all reported gains. The estimated pace far outstrips the seasonally adjusted annual rate of 14.3 million sales recorded last April, and March's 14.8 million-unit pace. "Pent-up fleet demand is being strategically delivered by some automakers looking to offset any decline in retail demand," Cox analysts wrote. "But the initial April estimates suggest there is little evidence of waning demand in the overall market. In fact, with inventory at the highest level in nearly two years and transaction prices trending downward through the first quarter, new-vehicle sales in the U.S. continue to surprise on the upside." In Ford's SUV segment, sales were down 11.3% from April 2022. For the Ford brand, sales of the EcoSport, Bronco Sport, Bronco, Mustang Mach-E, Edge and Explorer all were down compared to a year ago. The Escape, a compact SUV that just got a redesign, saw sales rise 10.5%, while the full-size Expedition was up more than 200%. Mach-E sales have been down as the plant in Mexico where it's assembled has gone through upgrades to support a boost in production. Ford aims to increase production to 130,000 units this year from 78,000 last year. It announced an across-the-board price cut on the Mach-E lineup Tuesday as it reopened orders for the EV. Truck and van sales, meanwhile, were up 21%, boosted by a 35.1% year-over-year gain for the F-Series franchise, Ford's profit pillar. The automaker sold 69,595 F-Series trucks last month compared to 51,517 a year ago, representing the franchise's best sales performance since before the coronavirus pandemic and related supply-chain issues. Those results were underpinned by the recent launch of the 2023 Super Duty, which Ford says is turning on dealer lots in about nine days. Ford reported 1,335 sales of the electric F-150 Lightning, which launched last April. The plant in Dearborn where the Lightning is assembled went through a five-week production shutdown earlier this year to resolve a battery issue; deliveries have since resumed. Sales of the Ford Ranger, Maverick, E-Transit and Transit Connect were down, while E-Series, Transit and heavy truck sales were up. Mustang sales were up 17.5%. Ford's luxury Lincoln brand saw sales drop off 27.8% from last April. Year-to-date, the automaker's U.S. results are up 8.3% from the first four months of 2022. Ford ended the month with nearly 377,000 vehicles in gross stock. |
Ford cuts Mustang Mach-E Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. on Wednesday will reopen order banks for the Mustang Mach-E — again lowering prices on the battery-electric crossover amid signals that an EV price war is brewing. The Dearborn automaker is reducing pricing across the Mach-E lineup by as much as $4,000, bringing the lowest-priced model, the select rear-wheel-drive standard range, down to $42,995 from $45,995. The highest-priced model, the GT all-wheel-drive extended range, will drop to $59,995 from $63,995. The move follows aggressive price cuts by EV market leader Tesla, which has sought to spur demand and increase its sales volumes while sacrificing some of its healthy profit margins. After Tesla slashed its pricing by as much as 20% in January, Ford followed shortly thereafter with reduced prices on the Mach-E, the inaugural offering in its first lineup of battery-electric vehicles, which competes directly with Tesla's Model Y. “Our competitors are also adjusting their prices,” Marin Gjaja, chief customer officer for Model e, Ford’s EV unit, said at the time, according to Bloomberg. “As we look and want to stay competitive in the marketplace, we’re having to respond.” Tesla this week raised prices on some of its models, CNBC reported, but its prices remain lower than they were at the start of the year. The previous reduction in Mach-E's pricing was described by some capital markets analysts as necessary to remain competitive, while others have been skeptical given that Ford currently is losing money on its EV business. But Ford executives have said that boosting production volumes on the Mach-E is driving cost reductions, enabling the price cuts. The plant in Mexico where the Mach-E is assembled recently went through a series of upgrades to support a production ramp-up in the second half of this year. The boost in Mach-E production to 130,000 units this year from 78,000 last year comes as Ford aims to hit a global run rate of 600,000 EVs annually by the end of this year and 2 million by the end of 2026 as part of its $50 billion electrification strategy. The automaker currently offers two other battery-electric products: the E-Transit cargo van and the F-150 Lightning pickup truck, for which Ford has raised the price numerous times since launching last spring. The Dearborn automaker is developing its next generation of EVs. Ford on Tuesday detailed some improvements to the Mach-E, including increased battery range for the standard-range models to a targeted EPA-estimated range of 250 miles for rear wheel drive and 226 miles for all wheel drive. Standard-range models now will be powered by lithium iron phosphate batteries, a change Ford previously announced and which it said would result in a gain in horsepower for the eAWD configuration. And standard-range models now will be able to charge to 100% more frequently via AC home charging, while DC fast charging on the road will see a slight reduction in the time needed to reach 80% battery capacity. The Mach-E now will come standard with the hardware necessary to activate BlueCruise, Ford's hands-free highway driving system. Ford is offering a complimentary 90-day trial in addition to the existing option of paying for a three-year subscription as part of the vehicle purchase. "We continue to find ways to improve the value of the Mustang Mach-E," Gjaja said in a statement. "Upgraded BlueCruise rolling out for new and existing Mustang Mach-E owners, increased range and faster DC charging times on standard range models show how we are relentlessly improving our products for our customers." Ford has said that the Mach-E qualifies for potential Inflation Reduction Act tax credits this year of $3,750. The new Mach-E prices, excluding destination/delivery fees, are: • Select RWD standard range: $42,995 (down $3,000) • Select AWD standard range: $45,995 (down $3,000) • California Route 1 AWD extended range: $56,995 (down $1,000) • Premium RWD standard range: $46,995 (down $4,000) • Premium AWD standard range: $49,995 (down $4,000) • GT AWD extended range: $59,995 (down $4,000) |
Ford posts strong revenue Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. posted profits of $1.8 billion in the first quarter of 2023, up from the $3.1 billion loss it reported a year ago. Revenue rose 20% year-over-year to $41.5 billion on a 9% increase in vehicle shipments over the same period last year. And adjusted operating profits were up 45% to $3.4 billion. The results beat analysts' expectations. Executives said that the quarter's profitability was bolstered by a "favorable mix of products, higher net pricing and increased volume." In a reflection of a restructuring of the company, Ford for the first time Tuesday reported financial results for three separate business units: Ford Blue, dedicated to gas and hybrid vehicles; Ford Model e, which is focused on electric vehicles, and Ford Pro, which handles commercial products and services. The EV business posted a $722 million operating loss on revenue of $700 million for the quarter — which should come as no surprise to investors after Ford previously disclosed that it plans to lose $3 billion on EVs this year. It expects EV losses to reverse in the coming years as volumes grow. Results also were held back by production interruptions for the Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning — electric derivatives of iconic favorites — in Q1 that constrained shipments and revenue. Operating profits for Ford Pro nearly tripled from a year ago to $1.4 billion on revenue of $13.2 billion, while Ford Blue's operating profits nearly doubled to $2.6 billion on revenue of $25.1 billion. Both segments were profitable in every geographic region where they operate, and had earnings margins of more than 10%. "We're bringing Ford+ to life by zeroing in on what distinct customers need and value the most," CEO Jim Farley said in a statement, referring to the company's growth plan. "Ford Pro is leading the way on profitable growth, our big investments in iconic Ford Blue vehicles and derivatives are winning with customers, and Ford Model e's different approach to EVs is significantly reducing costs on our first high-volume products while rapidly developing breakthrough next-generation vehicles from the ground up." The company ended the quarter with nearly $29 billion in cash and more than $46 billion in liquidity. The Dearborn automaker reaffirmed its full-year guidance of adjusted operating profits of between $9 billion and $11 billion, and adjusted free cash flow of about $6 billion. It also reaffirmed its segment-level expectations of about $7 billion in operating profits for Ford Blue; a full-year loss of $3 billion for Ford Model e; and operating profits of nearly $6 billion for Ford Pro. Crosstown rival General Motors Co. last week beat Wall Street expectations with first-quarter profits of $2.4 billion on revenue of $40 billion. The Detroit automaker raised its guidance for the year to adjusted operating profits of between $11 billion and $13 billion. |
Grocery giants are The main cause of rising food prices is the small bloc of powerful companies who control Canada’s food processing and retail industries by Emma Paling The real cause of skyrocketing food prices is corporate greed and market concentration—and one group of farmers has the receipts. The National Farmers Union (NFU) has submitted data to the House of Commons agriculture committee which details how much retail food prices have risen compared to the prices that farmers receive for their goods. In fact, the union says retail prices have been completely “decoupled” from corresponding food inputs. This means that while grocery store prices reach record highs, the farmers who stock their shelves are not seeing any of those profits—and a small group of processing and retail corporations are lining their own pockets instead. “We need to be real about where the money is going,” NFU president Jenn Pfenning, who farms organic vegetables near Kitchener, Ont., told The Breach. Retailers and processors are taking larger portions of the money spent on food, while farmers are stuck with rising costs and stalled prices. “At the end of the day, retailers are posting record profits,” Pfenning said. “Farmers are, in many cases…posting either record or close-to-record losses and low margins.” The price of bread has risen far more sharply than the price farmers get paid for their wheat, data submitted by the NFU to Parliament show. Graph: The Breach Data: Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food Crops — Statfact and Statistics Canada via NFU “From 2003-2016, bread prices rose steadily, far outpacing the minor increases in farmgate wheat prices,” NFU’s submission from last week explained. Farmgate prices are the prices of goods bought directly from farmers without markup added by retailers. The union says the costs borne by consumers have been completely detached from the prices paid to farmers since the 2000s. “Farmgate prices for wheat did increase in 2021 and 2022, potentially driven by the war in Ukraine and other factors. However, they did not come close to narrowing the gap that has steadily widened since the beginning of this data series.” Caption: The rising price of cereal has become completely detached from the amount farmers get paid. Graph: The Breach Data: Canada Grains Council and Statistics Canada via NFU Another example about the costs of corn and corn flakes shows an even more dramatic example of the “decoupling” of retail prices from the prices of farmers’ goods. The trend extends to other markets: the price of bacon has risen at a completely different rate than the price of hogs. At one point, the price of hogs actually fell while the price of bacon increased. This massive disparity has been growing for decades. The trend suggests that it’s not the prices farmers are charging, the COVID-19 pandemic or the war in Ukraine driving the biggest rises in food prices. It’s the processors, packers and retailers who—in heavily concentrated markets—have the power to raise prices and take larger profit margins. Grocery chains double their profits Supermarkets have doubled their profits since 2019, economist Jim Stanford of the Centre for Future Work reported in a separate submission to the agriculture committee. Grocery executives have done this while blaming the pandemic, the war and their suppliers, as Sobeys CEO Michael Medline and Metro CEO Eric La Flèche did in their appearances before the committee. But these companies have actually hiked their prices “above and beyond” what would be necessary to cover their increased costs, Stanford said. And big corporate processors like Cargill and PepsiCo have done the same thing. “Like the supermarkets, food processors have also increased prices more than justified by their own increased costs,” Stanford’s report said. “Food manufacturing profits have grown notably since the pandemic: up 42% in the latest 12-month period, compared to 2019.” Meanwhile, food banks say they’re at their “breaking point” as they try to feed more Canadians than ever before. Small bloc of companies exerts control These corporations get away with it because they have high levels of control. Canada’s food retail and processing markets are heavily concentrated, which means a small number of companies control both the prices they pay to suppliers and the prices they charge consumers. Five retailers—Loblaw, Sobeys, Metro, Costco and Walmart—control 75 per cent of Canada’s food retail market. In processing, the Canadian market is even more consolidated in some cases. Just two corporations—one of which was owned by Loblaw parent company George Weston Ltd. until recently—control 80 per cent of the bread-making market, for example. The result is that farmers are facing dire financial circumstances, Pfenning said. They’re struggling with increased costs for virtually everything they need to grow food: land, equipment, soil amendments and more. Yet the prices they’re paid are virtually stagnant. “Farmers and consumers are clearly in the same boat,” NFU vice president Stewart Wells said in a press release about the new data, “dealing with a highly consolidated processing and retail sector that can set prices to suit themselves and award enormous salaries to corporate CEOs.” |
Workers gain protection as APRIL 29, 2023 Ottawa – Bill C-228, a private members’ bill that gives pension plan members super-priority during plan windups and bankruptcy proceedings received royal assent. “This change has been many years in the making. I’m glad to see lawmakers in both chambers say ‘enough is enough’ and put workers first by adopting this legislation,” said Lana Payne, Unifor National President. “Pensions are deferred wages and they cannot be allowed to be stripped away and put to the back of the line if the company closes up shop.” Despite being adopted, the Bill’s changes will not come into effect for four more years. C-228, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act and the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 was a private members’ bill tabled by the MP for Sarnia-Lambton Marylin Gladu. “For too long, corporate bosses have been allowed to doll out dividends and executive bonuses during bankruptcy while retirees had their fixed and often already low incomes slashed. Canadians remember the Sears closure, and the devastating effects of the old system of prioritization. This law finally corrects that order of priorities to protect pensioners,” said Les MacDonald, Unifor National Executive Board Retirees Representative. MacDonald presented to the Senate Committee considering the Bill in February 2023 and reported on the positive impact the legislation will have on retirement security for workers in Canada. Currently, if an employer has a defined-benefit pension plan and declares bankruptcy or insolvency, the plan needs to be wound up so that all pension assets are paid out. Pension plans may suffer from wind up deficits, a term that calculates the amount of additional money needed to fund the benefits to 100% for retirees on the date of wind up. Bill C-228 will put any outstanding amounts due to the pension fund wind up ahead of secured creditors, regardless of whether the corporate entity declares bankruptcy or restructuring. The union supported the adoption of this legislation and will continue to negotiate strong pension benefits for members in every region of the country “Bill C-228 means that workers can have even more faith that their negotiated pensions are guaranteed. They put in the work, they deserve the benefits. Why shouldn’t workers come first?” continued Payne. Unifor is Canada's largest union in the private sector and represents 315,000 workers in every major area of the economy. The union advocates for all working people and their rights, fights for equality and social justice in Canada and abroad, and strives to create progressive change for a better future.
|
Stellantis offers buyouts to 33,500 Breana Noble Stellantis NV is asking the more than 33,500 hourly and salaried employees to consider over the coming weeks taking voluntary buyouts announced Wednesday by the maker of Jeep SUVs and Ram pickup trucks, a response to an increasingly competitive autos market and the expensive shift to electrification. The automaker declined to provide reduction targets for both the bargaining and non-bargaining workforces, but spokesperson Jodi Tinson said the company will make the packages available to 31,000 hourly workers in the United States and Canada and 2,500 U.S. salaried employees. In a statement, United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain blasted the proposed cuts as "disgusting." A letter from a local United Auto Workers president circulating earlier this week on Facebook suggested the company is looking to reduce its hourly workforce by as many as 3,500 employees in response to stiff market competition and the costly shift to electrification. Realizing a cleaner energy future is turning out to be a somewhat messy business: Stellantis follows General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. in offering buyouts to reduce costs and gain greater financial flexibility. The moves come amid an especially tense contract negotiation year with the UAW and amid looming fears of a recession. Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares has said EVs are 40% more expensive to produce than their gas- and diesel-powered counterparts. The company must absorb those costs, he says, to avoid increased prices on customers that would shrink the marketplace further and risk more jobs. Workers eligible for the buyouts to which the UAW agreed should receive an offer letter starting next week. If open positions result from departures, they could present opportunities for indefinitely laid-off workers to step into those jobs and for part-time supplemental workers to transition into full-time roles. Stellantis employs about 43,000 hourly and 13,000 salaried workers in the United States and 8,000 hourly employees in Canada. Stellantis has made "solid progress" on its Dare Forward 2030 strategy, which includes doubling global revenues and launching 25 all-electric vehicles for the U.S. market, said Mark Stewart, Stellantis NV's chief operating officer in North America, in an email to employees obtained by The Detroit News. Reviews of the automaker's operations have found more room to improve overall efficiency. "We know that investment decisions at Stellantis are based on many key factors, starting with market conditions, quality and transformation costs," he said. "As a team, we must continue to identify efficiencies to make our operations more competitive both inside and outside the company. The competition is fierce, and the cost of electrification cannot be passed on to the customer. Make no mistake, we intend to win in the marketplace." A lot is at stake in this transition, according to experts, and newly elected UAW leaders say they are determined to ensure it doesn't become a race to the bottom as their employers rake in billions of dollars. Stellantis posted $18 billion in profit globally in 2022 with $14.9 billion in adjusted operating income from North America. Its U.S. sales in the first quarter of 2023, though, fell 9%. The automaker will share first-quarter shipments and revenue on May 3. “Stellantis’ push to cut thousands of jobs while raking in billions in profits is disgusting," the UAW's Fain said in his statement, echoing remarks shared last week about his "fractured" relationship with Stellantis and during the special bargaining convention last month. “This is a slap in the face to our members, their families, their communities, and the American people who saved this company 15 years ago. Even now, politicians and taxpayers are bankrolling the electric vehicle transition, and this is the thanks the working class gets. Shame on Stellantis.” Details of the salaried separation packages weren't immediately available. The buyouts are being offered to designated non-represented U.S. employees with 15 or more years of service. Hourly workers will have until June 16 to accept, Tinson confirmed. Separation will be effective as soon as the end of June and continue through the end of the year. Retirement-eligible seniority workers will receive $50,000. Others with at least one year with the company will be offered a lump sum based on years of experience with the company. Calling the decision "unilateral," Lana Payne, president of the Canadian autoworker union Unifor, said in a statement the buyout decision doesn't negate the company's commitment to invest in vehicle and battery production and that it will "hold Stellantis firmly to these commitments." The automaker is investing $2.8 billion to retool assembly plants in Brampton and Windsor, Ontario, and for a battery lab in Windsor. It's also building a $4.1 billion battery plant with LG Energy Solution in Windsor, which is expected to create 2,500 jobs. "These voluntary programs," spokesperson Shawn Morgan said in a statement, "are being offered to provide a favorable option to employees looking to pursue new opportunities, while preserving critical roles the company needs in order to maintain its competitive advantage." The buyouts offered by GM and Ford had been limited to white-collar workers. GM earlier this month said about 5,000 employees accepted its offer, taking a $1 billion charge in the first quarter. Ford offered buyouts last year to eliminate 2,000 salaried jobs and 1,000 contract jobs. Stellantis last year also offered U.S. salaried workers buyouts, though it hasn't disclosed how many accepted that offer. In 2021, more than 330 retirement-eligible salaried workers took a buyout from the automaker. These moves provide "dry powder and flexibility for a pivotal 18-24 months ahead," said Dan Ives, an analyst for investment firm Wedbush Securities Inc. "As these companies transform, they look to rid themselves of legacy cost and become more nimble and efficient," he said. "GM ripped the Band-Aid off. Others saw it was a successful and a cleaner way to go through a process like that instead of layoffs and negative headlines." Supply-chain snags, high transaction prices and increased interest rates have had automakers looking at 14 million-unit annual U.S. sales instead of 17 million units pre-pandemic — and EVs represent just 6% of that total right now, noted Patrick Anderson, CEO of East Lansing-based Anderson Economic Group LLC. That has significant implications for the economy, especially in Michigan. "We have a very risky bet on one specific technology," he said. "Economically, this is a signal that the auto industry that produced so many decades of great jobs and great income is becoming a hard place to stay for your whole career. The industry is going to lose some really talented people." All of the automakers do have many retirement-eligible workers, especially in its blue-collar workforce, said Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecast at AutoForecast Solutions LLC. Stellantis, however, in February idled its Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois indefinitely, affecting 1,350 workers. It also in October eliminated the third shift at the Warren Truck Assembly Plant, though it said expects to resume the shift as it ramps up the extended wheelbase version of the full-size Wagoneer SUVs. "All the manufacturers anticipate fewer jobs needed to make electric vehicles," Fiorani said. "The company is either going to find product to fill a plant or reduce headcount. The best way to do that is find people who will retire." Taking steps to reduce their workforce isn't uncommon in a contract negotiation year, noted Art Wheaton, an automotive industry specialist at Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School. "It reduces their longer-term cost so they can have some flexibility on job announcements," he said. "It's not necessarily a bad thing to say, ‘We're letting you have the opportunity to retire early so we don’t have to lay off.'" The proposed cuts come as the automaker is posting record profitability, not losses. In March, Stellantis paid 40,500 eligible workers profit-sharing checks, which were pegged at a record $14,760, though the payments could have been more or less depending on the number of hours each employee worked. |
UAW: Stellantis will offer Breana Noble The maker of Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles is looking to reduce its U.S. hourly workforce by as many as 3,500 employees through buyouts, according to a letter posted by a United Auto Workers local on Facebook. Stellantis NV spokeswoman Jodi Tinson said she wouldn't respond Tuesday to the details in the letter dated Monday from Doug McIntosh, president of Local 1264, which represents workers at the automaker's stamping plant in Sterling Heights. Indefinitely laid-off workers would have the opportunity to fill in the created openings, McIntosh noted. The potential offer of incentive packages comes ahead of critical contract negotiations later this year with the UAW that will influence labor costs, product allocation and how workers at plants producing electric vehicles and their components are treated. This all comes as the outlook for the second half of the year remains uncertain, thanks to inflation, higher interest rates and other economic uncertainties. The UAW's newly elected president, Shawn Fain, last week discussed a "fractured" relationship with Stellantis regarding its approach to electrification and following the indefinite idling in February of the Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois, which affected 1,350 workers. His remarks reflected the ongoing tension expressed by Fain and other UAW leaders with the Detroit Three automakers, including calling them the "enemies" and that the UAW must "punch them in the mouth." Stellantis plans to launch 25 all-electric models for the U.S. market by 2030. CEO Carlos Tavares has emphasized the need to find savings because electric vehicles are 40% more expensive than their internal combustion engine counterparts. In his letter, McIntosh wrote that the local's leadership had a conference call with UAW Vice President Rich Boyer, head of the union's Stellantis Department, about the incentive packages that will be offered corporate-wide for production and skilled trades workers. The UAW and automaker are in talks to accept everyone who signs up for the offer, McIntosh wrote. He said two packages will be offered. The incentive package for retirement, called "IPR," would provide $50,000 for seniority workers hired prior to the 2007 agreement. The voluntary termination of employment program, or "VTEP," provides a "guaranteed lumpsum benefit payment" for employees with at least one year of seniority. The sign-up dates tentatively are scheduled for May 6 to June 19, McIntosh said. Separation dates would begin June 30 and run through the end of the year. Packages are expected to be mailed to eligible workers in the next week or so. A UAW spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The potential offers by Stellantis appear to indicate that the automaker is seeking to avoid hourly layoffs and stay on good terms with the union as it frees up capital for electrification, said Marick Masters, a management professor at Wayne State University. “The industry is in a such a position it doesn’t have time to wait,” he said. “It’s going to take its chances on aligning its cost structure to permit its capital investment plans to go ahead as needed. And they’re going to work with the union to the greatest extent possible to keep it on board in what is making a difficult, but necessary decision, given what is going on in the state of the industry.” The report from McIntosh comes as Local UAW 1700 leaders blasted plans at Sterling Heights Assembly Plant to cut jobs that they said would lead to layoffs following an assessment of efficiencies at the facility. Stellantis in October also cut the third shift at its Warren Truck Assembly Plant, home of the Wagoneer SUV and Ram Classic pickup truck, in response to the global chip shortage. It, however, plans to bring back the shift after it has addressed quality issues and as it ramps up production of the longer-wheelbase version of the Wagoneers. Stellantis last fall made available early retirements to certain U.S. salaried employees, though it hasn't said how many employees accepted the offer. GM recently offered white-collar workers buyouts, with about 5,000 accepting. Ford Motor Co. has made similar packages available to employees, too. |
UAW president on auto contract Jordyn Grzelewski Newly-elected United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain's message to Detroit auto executives is clear: Workers cannot be left behind in the industry's accelerating transition to electric vehicles. Fain, who took office last month following the union's first-ever direct elections of top leaders, reiterated that message Friday during a virtual Automotive Press Association event during which he answered questions from journalists. During the hour-long Q&A, Fain argued that battery plant workers should actually make higher wages than the industry standard for traditional production jobs; castigated Stellantis NV for its move to idle its Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois; and said it would be up to the Detroit automakers whether they will face a UAW strike during a crucial set of contract negotiations that start later this year. He also criticized the industry's move toward joint-venture battery plant operations, and argued that legacy manufacturing workers should be able to move into the EV and battery jobs of the future. “I want to work with the companies. I want to have a good relationship," Fain said. "But if they’re not going to treat our members with respect and give them their due, then we’re going to have issues.” Battery manufacturing jobs Auto companies have announced more than $128 billion in investments in EV plants, battery factories and battery recycling, NPR reported in December. This spending blitz is being fueled by billions of dollars in federal subsidies included in the Inflation Reduction Act, which looks to incentivize domestic production of EVs and their parts, and to spur higher consumer adoption of plug-in vehicles. Fain on Friday argued that autoworkers should share in the benefits of this manufacturing boom, especially because of the scale of taxpayer-funded support the industry is receiving. “The taxpayers are investing a lot of money into this transition," he said. "A lot of that investment is not going into the workers; the money is going into the corporate coffers. So there’s got to be a balance there.” Fain expressed disappointment with the move by the Detroit automakers to form joint ventures with battery makers, a structure he acknowledged is partly based on the companies' technology needs — but one he believes is also partly designed to cut out union workers. He directed ire at his former employer, Stellantis NV, for their decision to establish a JV battery plant with Samsung SDI in his hometown of Kokomo, Indiana, a move he claimed UAW leaders did not become aware of until the day before the announcement. He also called the wage scale at the first General Motors Co. and LG Energy Solution JV Ultium Cells LLC plant in northeast Ohio "unacceptable." Battery cell production is underway there, and workers voted in December for UAW representation. Production associates make $16.50 per hour, which is about half of what GM employees covered by the national UAW contract make (GM workers will make $32.32 per hour by next September). Employees at the Warren, Ohio, plant told The Detroit News they were hoping to achieve wage increases and better safety standards with UAW representation. Negotiations between the UAW and Ultium kicked off earlier this year. On Friday, Fain said the talks were still in their early stages. "Ultium Cells is committed to the collective bargaining process, and will work in good faith with the UAW to reach a competitive agreement that positions our employees and our Ohio battery cell manufacturing facility for success," Ultium spokesperson Brooke Waid said in a statement. Fain argued that battery manufacturing workers actually should make higher wages than the current standard for production employees because of the specialized skills and training that type of work requires. "These people have to go through almost two years of training to be good at this. So these should be higher wages than our production standards, not lower," he said. "That kind of scale is setting our members back 10 or 15 years.” Talking to Detroit 3 execs Fain revealed that he has met with leaders at General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. He described the conversations as "respectful" but said he clearly expressed his stance that the status quo is unacceptable, and characterized a discussion with Stellantis executives last week as "stern." “The bottom line in all of this, is to make a very clear message, especially to Stellantis with a plant closing going on right now and also all three companies with the shift to EV, that we expect our members to not get lost in the shuffle throughout this," said Fain. "And we expect these jobs in this transition to be good-paying jobs that raise people up, not take us back." He described the UAW's current relationship with Stellantis as "fractured," pointing to the Belvidere situation and comments CEO Carlos Tavares has made about absenteeism in plants. "When the CEO of the company can fly over here and go to our plants and threaten our members about future product and absenteeism, but can’t take the time to reach out to us and have a discussion with us, that’s a problem," he said. "And meanwhile we have language, plant closing moratoriums, plant idling moratoriums, in our contracts. And this is a flat-out, black-and-white violation, what they’re doing right now. When they take action like that that hurts our members, things aren’t going to be good. That’s as blunt as I can be about it, and I have been with all three." Stellantis declined to comment on Fain's remarks. Fain's tenure as president kicked off just months before contract negotiations with the Detroit automakers are slated to begin ahead of September, when the current four-year agreements expire. He declined to get into specific strategies the UAW may have in the works, such as identifying a lead company to bargain with, and indicated leaders still are formulating plans ahead of a national contract campaign. But priorities include job security provisions, doing away with tiered wage systems, and securing members' role in the auto industry's transition to EVs. Asked about the likelihood of a strike, he said: “I’ll leave it up to the companies. I’ve been very clear to them: Our members expect their fair share, and if they don’t get it, then we’re going to do what we have to do.” |
Ford to export F-150 Jordyn Grzelewski The F-150 Lightning is going global. Ford Motor Co. announced Thursday that, spurred by customer demand, the plug-in pickup is headed — on a limited basis — to the most advanced EV market in the world: Norway. "This is a really important step in our electrification journey," said Darren Palmer, vice president of electric vehicle programs for Ford Model e. The Scandinavian country of more than 5 million people will be the first market outside of the United States and Canada to import the F-150 Lightning, a battery-electric version of Ford's signature product, the gas-powered version being the best-selling vehicle in the United States. Norwegian customers can apply to purchase a Lightning from an unspecified "limited number" of special Lariat Launch Edition trucks. The F-150 Lightning Lariat Launch Edition for customers in Norway will be offered exclusively with Super Crew Cab body style in Antimatter Blue metallic body color, according to a news release. Deliveries will start next year. “In my 25 years at Ford, I’ve never seen anything like the passion and demand I’m seeing from drivers right now to get behind the wheel of our F-150 Lightning. I’ve had customers literally banging on my door and pleading for us to bring the electric pickup to Norway,” Per Gunnar Berg, managing director, Ford Norway, said in a statement. “F-150 Lightning is the perfect match for many customers in Norway — uniquely capable of quenching our thirst for adventure while embracing our passion for protecting the environment.” The move to bring the Lightning to markets outside of North America follows Ford's market expansion for another one of its popular EVs, the Mustang Mach-E, which now sells in 39 markets — including the most recent additions of Australia and Taiwan. Ford officials declined to say the volume they expect to sell in Norway or other export markets, but Palmer noted the automaker already has been working to expand production capacity at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn. The expansion into Norway, he said, would not affect F-150 Lightning availability elsewhere. Ford is investing $50 billion into electrification through 2026, by which time it's targeting an annual production rate of 2 million EVs. The automaker has said it is on track to meet its goal of boosting F-150 Lightning production capacity to an annualized rate of 150,000 units by year's end. This fall, Ford is shifting an 800-person crew to the Rouge facility and hiring several hundred more to help with the effort. Ford in March restarted production of the Lightning following a five-week production shutdown due to a battery issue. The automaker recalled 18 of the trucks due to a battery cell manufacturing defect. Ford's EV sales in the United States rose 41% year-over-year in the first quarter, but the automaker ceded its No. 2 EV market position to crosstown rival General Motors Co. The automaker has been moving to boost production of some of its most popular products, including the Mach-E and the Lightning. Ford reported 4,291 sales of the Lightning, which went on sale last spring, in the first quarter. Although full-size pickup trucks are almost exclusively popular among customers in North America, Ford officials said while the vehicles are not viable for many parts of Europe, Norway is a unique market where there are signs of demand for full-size trucks. This would mark the first full-size pickup to enter the market in Norway, they said. Some 80% of new car sales in Norway are electric; the country is moving to all new car sales being zero emission vehicles by 2025. Ford is targeting zero emissions for all vehicle sales in Europe by 2035. Globally, the company expects EVs to make up half of its vehicle sales volume by 2030. |
Retiree Joe Blum passes Away Joe Retired Jan 1, 1989 with 22.3 yrs of service. Our sincerest condolences go out to his Family. No Funeral Arrangements are presently available
|
Sources say Volkswagen’s new Ottawa and Queen’s Park hope the auto giant’s new manufacturing complex will be the lynchpin of a new “green” supply chain in Canada. By Tonda MacCharles OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Premier Doug Ford hit the road Friday to finally unveil plans for the new multi-billion dollar Volkswagen electric vehicle “gigafactory” in St. Thomas. Ottawa and Queen’s Park hope the German auto giant’s massive new manufacturing complex will be the lynchpin of a new “green” supply chain in Canada. Volkswagen announced last month it chose southwestern Ontario over U.S states like Oklahoma that were vying for the global automakers’ first battery plant outside Europe. The “gigafactory” will sprawl over hundreds of acres near London, Ont., and produce hundreds of thousands of electric car batteries a year to generate “gigawatts” of battery power for the burgeoning EV market in North America. Sources close to the negotiations between Ottawa, Queen’s Park and the German auto giant say the Volkswagen deal will be larger than the Stellantis expansions in Brampton and Windsor that Trudeau and Ford announced together last year. But they are equally tightlipped about details of just how much — in tax credits, capital expenditure support or other incentive measures — each level of government had to put on the table to lure Volkswagen here. Thirteen months ago — in what was then called the biggest single auto investment in Canada history — Stellantis, parent company of Jeep, Chrysler and Fiat, pledged a $5-billion EV battery complex for Windsor, which will employ 2,500 workers when it opens in 2025. Last May, in Brampton, the international automaker said another $1 billion would go to revamping the Chrysler plant there to make next generation hybrid and electric vehicles. But sources say the Volkswagen deal, expected to include perhaps $2 billion in federal and provincial subsidies for capital expenditures and more in tax credit supports, will dwarf those announcements. “Volkswagen will release (its) investment, how many employees (it) expects to hire and there will be more information about what (it is) going to make at the new facility,” said a source, speaking confidentially in order to discuss internal deliberations. “This will mean thousands of jobs. Each of these plants requires supporting plants so other companies will be supplying Volkwagen as well,” said a source, referring to the massive manufacturing eco-system that a gigafactory requires. “These are all other companies — and each of those plants will be in the billion-dollar range,” the source said. Flavio Volpe, head of the Canadian Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, is not privy to the deal’s details. But he expects a mix of elements to make up the government package for what he guessed could be initially a $6 billion plant. But Volpe noted Volkswagen’s subsidiary PowerCo SE has acquired 1,500 acres of land, about five times the size of the Windsor Stellantis plant, signalling that the company intends to scale up down the road. Volpe said the potential economic return on any government investment in a plant of this size is huge, even before expansion, with up to 2,500 factory floor jobs, plus another 5,000 in spinoff jobs in the plant’s supply chain, and hundreds of millions in future corporate and personal income tax revenues for government coffers. “It’s more than a market return” on investment, he said. A senior source said government support for projects usually comes as help for capital expenditures, but in the face of the Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act — a $369-billion package of incentives to anchor green investment in that country — Canada must compete against what the U.S. is offering, which is billions of dollars to offset operating expenditures over time through production tax credits. The value of those credits to any company depends on future production levels. Canada’s strategy, however, has been to offer companies tax credits on the initial investments at the front end, which can also serve to incentivize future expansion of operations. In its budget, the federal Liberal government said it expects to spend about $80 billion over 11 years on a massive package of “green” investment tax credits. RBC assistant chief economist Cynthia Leach wrote this week that Ottawa has calculated that upfront payment in capital intensive sectors “is seen as providing significant value, and the best way for federal dollars to influence clean technology improvement.” In an interview she said it is also important for governments to provide “more transparency around this, given that industrial policies are making a big comeback in Canada and globally; we need to understand what value we’re getting for it.” The federal budget document did not specifically identify the cost of the VW deal, she said, but it’s clear that the federal government, in its effort to draw investment and tackle climate change, is making a “bet on the supply side, saying we need the supply side to line up to facilitate and enable decarbonisation.” “And I think within that context, you need to be strategic about supporting technologies where they are represent important (emission) abatement pathways for the Canadian and global economy. So it’s not just what the U.S. is doing with IRA that I think does require us to rethink what we’re doing and be more strategic, but it’s also the demands of climate and the need to find a way to accelerate investments.” The federal Conservatives, who oppose any price on carbon and traditionally oppose government subsidies to big corporations on the grounds that the government should not be “picking winners and losers,” have not publicly supported the Volkswagen deal. After Volkswagen announced its choice of St. Thomas on Mar. 13 Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre tweeted outrage at Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne’s suggestion federal supports will pay off in good Canadian jobs and economic growth. “This money belongs to Canadians. Not to a foreign corporation. Not to Justin Trudeau. How much of Canadians’ money is he giving to this foreign corporation? How many jobs? How much is the cost per job?” Poilievre demanded. |
U.S. House Ways and Means Riley Beggin Washington — The chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee wrote a letter Monday to Ford Motor Co. arguing the company's planned battery plan in Marshall, Michigan, may go against the intent of the Inflation Reduction Act. Ford is building a $3.5 billion battery plant in the small town east of Battle Creek to power its new electric vehicles. It is licensing technology for the project from Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., or CATL, which is based in China and is the world's leading EV battery maker. That arrangement has come under fire from Republicans in Congress, who have argued the project may pose a national security risk and would unjustly benefit from taxpayer subsidies through the IRA. Ford, whose global headquarters are in Dearborn, has said the company will wholly own and control the battery facility. "I am alarmed about how Ford has structured this project in the context of the IRA's clean vehicle credits and am concerned that other automakers may seek to use loopholes in the IRA to avoid guardrails meant to protect American enterprise and workers," Rep. Jason Smith, R-Missouri, wrote in a letter to Ford CEO Jim Farley. The letter also included a series of questions about Ford's relationship with CATL and its intention to claim tax credits related to electric vehicle production or sales. The $7,500 consumer discounts on electric vehicles included in the IRA bar any company that uses battery components made or assembled by a "foreign entity of concern" from benefitting — one of multiple provisions aimed at pushing automakers away from supply chains that are heavily dominated by China. The U.S. Treasury has not yet released rules indicating how this part of the law will be applied, but Smith questioned whether batteries produced at the planned Marshall plant would qualify. He sent similar letters to 10 other automakers, including Audi AG, BMW AG, General Motors Co., Hyundai Motor Co., Nissan Motor Co., Rivian Automotive Inc., Stellantis NV, Tesla Inc., Volkswagen AG and Volvo Cars Ltd. Ford did not immediately comment on Smith's request, but has pushed back on Republicans' characterizations of the Marshall project as a workaround to the IRA's requirements. T.R. Reid, director of corporate and public policy for Ford, told The Detroit News in February that the company is paying CATL for the right to use the latter company's proprietary technology and its counsel in applying that technology. He also noted that companies such as Tesla Inc. and Honda Motor Corp. import batteries directly from CATL, which Ford has also done. "We think the better solution for customers, for the country, including for workers and their families, and for Ford is to build them here," he said. CATL's lithium iron phosphate battery is the best of its type out there, he added, "and we want to use it as we continue to lead the EV transition. And the agreement is for us to be able to do that through the plant that we're building, will own, with our employees and — this is not unimportant — our additional layer of Ford innovation." State officials in Michigan, which has approved up to $210 million in state grants and $772 million in property tax exemptions for the project, have similarly defended the project. "The real national security risk is not having domestic supply chains — the impacts of which we saw firsthand during the pandemic, when production lines screeched to a halt and auto prices went through the roof because these products were solely manufactured overseas," Kathleen Achtenberg, a spokeswoman for the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, said in February. "To insulate our economy, we must reverse decades of jobs and technology going overseas — and we are leading that effort right here in Michigan." |
U.S. Supreme Court won't Kalea Hall The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a request from General Motors Co. to hear its racketeering lawsuit against crosstown competitor Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, now known as Stellantis NV. GM in January asked the justices to review its claims against FCA after the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in August affirmed a federal judge's decision to toss the lawsuit filed in 2019. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case lets the lower court ruling stand. "We are continuing to press our case against Stellantis and the other defendants in Michigan state court, where GM’s claims are different and much broader than those brought under the federal racketeering statute," GM spokesperson Maria Raynal said in a statement. "Today’s decision has no impact on that case and our efforts to hold defendants accountable for the harm they inflicted on GM as a result of their admitted corruption." In a statement, Stellantis spokesperson Shawn Morgan said the company is "pleased that the U.S. Supreme Court has denied GM’s latest attempt to resuscitate the baseless claims that GM has sought to bring in various forms in multiple jurisdictions. Today’s decision upholding the district court’s dismissal of GM’s lawsuit is another reaffirmation that its claims are meritless. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously against these allegations and we will not be distracted from our focus on competing and winning in the marketplace." GM sued its competitor, alleging FCA's late CEO Sergio Marchionne orchestrated a multimillion-dollar racketeering conspiracy that used bribes to corrupt three rounds of bargaining with the United Auto Workers in order to harm GM. The Detroit automaker has said it lost "billions" as a result of the alleged bribery conspiracy to boost GM's labor costs during negotiations with the UAW. Stellantis in March urged the Supreme Court not to take up GM's racketeering lawsuit, arguing it was not warranted and that the legal question at issue wouldn't change the outcome in the case. |
Shareholders support Stellantis Breana Noble Shareholders of the maker of Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles overwhelmingly approved the remuneration for Stellantis NV CEO Carlos Tavares during its annual general meeting on Thursday. Shareholders expressed their support for Tavares' compensation with 80.44% voting in favor of it, spokesman Fernão Silveira confirmed to The Detroit News. The approval was a reverse of last year's advisory vote when a majority of shareholders expressed disapproval of the CEO's compensation. Tavares' total compensation package for 2022, which includes long-term compensation, rose 22% year-over-year to $24.8 million (23.5 million euro). Stellantis said his cash and vested equity awards totaled $15.8 million (14.9 million euro), a 13% decrease. At last year's meeting, 52% of Stellantis shareholders withheld their support for the remuneration of the automaker's executives, after some, including the French government amid an election, questioned the amount being paid to Tavares. The advisory vote was meant to provide guidance for the company's board of directors and didn't directly affect the compensation of executives, though in response, the board held two engagement rounds with institutional investors. Based on that feedback, the 2022 remuneration report included more disclosures on performance targets and compensation such as specifically stating Tavares' direct compensation. Shareholders on Thursday also approved an amendment to the remuneration policy that provides for equity awards under the company's long-term incentive plan to consist only of performance shares. Stellantis chairman John Elkann emphasized during the meeting the "meritocratic" culture of the company that encourages financial and environmental, social and corporate governance goals. "The objective of the remuneration policy," he said, "is to provide a compensation structure that allows Stellantis to attract and retain the most highly qualified executives and colleagues and motivate them to achieve business and financial goals that create value for all of you, our shareholders, and all of our stakeholders in a manner consistent with what we believe is our purpose and our values." Two proxy advisory firms were split on whether to support the advisory remuneration vote, Reuters reported earlier this month. European automotive CEOs traditionally receive smaller compensation packages than their American counterparts. Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley's 2022 compensation package, however, was $21 million, down 8% from what he pocketed the year prior as the Dearborn automaker reported a $2 billion loss. General Motors Co. CEO Mary Barra typically is the highest paid of Detroit's automakers. Her 2022 package is expected to be shared this month. In 2021, she received $29.1 million. Stellantis' 13% adjusted operating income margin met its double-digit expectations for 2022. In February, it reported a 26% year-over-year increase in net income to $17.9 billion, the most of the Detroit Three. It benefited from cost-cutting efforts and strong pricing because of low dealership inventories resulting from a global semiconductor shortage. It estimated cost savings from the 2021 merger between Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and the PSA Group that created Stellantis achieved a net cash benefit of $7.6 billion for the year. The remuneration of Tavares, 64, is about 365 times as much as the company's average employee compensation of about $67,900. Eligible employees represented by the United Auto Workers received $14,760 in profit-sharing checks for 2022's results, a piece of the $2.13 billion in performance-based benefits distributed globally. A separate advisory vote concerned $54 million in compensation to former FCA CEO Mike Manley, who left his role overseeing Stellantis' operations in North and South America to become the CEO of auto retailer AutoNation Inc. in 2021. The payout was based on an agreement between him and FCA prior to the merger that allowed accelerated vesting of stock awards and a severance because he no longer would be CEO. That vote received 51.85% support, Silveira said. The annual general meeting was the first held in-person in Amsterdam, where Stellantis is domiciled, since its merger because of the COVID-19 pandemic. It featured a somewhat tense exchange around the automaker's sustainability goals with one shareholder emphasizing its commitment to reduce carbon emissions by 50% from 2021 levels should include "scope three," which covers emissions from assets over which the automaker doesn't have direct control like its suppliers. Stellantis has made a net-zero carbon goal for 2038, which includes all three scopes. "It is very clear that we need to encourage the supply chain to follow us at the same speed at the same time," Tavares said in response to the question. "We cannot commit on things we cannot control." Tavares' presentation overviewing the company's results from 2022 and progress toward its Dare Forward 2030 goals continued to assert its push to have half of its U.S. sales be all-electric by 2030. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed new standards for model years 2027 to 2032 that could accelerate EV penetration to as high as 60% by 2030. Shareholders also approved a new non-executive director appointment to the board for a two-year term. Benoît Ribadeau-Dumas is a partner at Exor NV, the holding company of Fiat's founding Agnelli family, and former chief of staff to France's prime minister. Shareholders also confirmed a $4.5 billion ordinary dividend to those of record on April 24 that will be paid on May 4. |
EPA unveiling 'strongest Breana Noble Riley Beggin The Biden administration on Wednesday is unveiling the "strongest ever" tailpipe emissions standards that are expected to push automakers to accelerate the proportion of electric vehicles in their U.S. sales to 67% by 2032. The proposed rules by the Environmental Protection Agency, which govern greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants from light-duty vehicles such as cars, trucks and SUVs, call for a 56% reduction for the applicable model years 2027 to 2032. The EPA projects that by 2055, the rules would remove nearly 10 billion tons of carbon emissions — equal to twice the total U.S. carbon emissions in 2022 — reducing fine particulate matter in the air that can have negative health effects and potentially saving up to $1.6 trillion. EPA Administrator Michael Regan, in a virtual briefing ahead of a news conference on Wednesday morning in Washington, D.C., called the targets, which will undergo a public comment period before being finalized, "ambitious." In August 2021, President Joe Biden had set a goal for half of new U.S. vehicle sales to be all-electric by 2030. Now, the new standard suggests EV penetration would be at 60% by 2030 to meet the proposed standards. "The stakes could not be higher," Regan said. "We must continue to act with haste and ambition to confront the climate crisis and to leave all our children, like my 9-year-old son, Matthew, a healthier and safer world. By doing so, we will secure America's global competitiveness and deliver economic benefits for all." EVs represented 5.8% of U.S. sales in 2022, according to AutoForecast Solutions LLC, which expects that to jump to 8.8% this year. But even by 2032, the market forecast firm is unsure adoption will reach 45%. Other analysts' predictions also fall below the EPA's proposed 67%. "The growth in EVs will slow down," said Sam Fiorani, the firm's vice president of global vehicle forecasting. "EVs are not ready to replace ICEs 100%." Although the EPA emphasized EVs, the rules themselves are "technology-neutral," said Ali Zaidi, the White House's national climate adviser. That would allow for the inclusion of alternative propulsion technology such as hydrogen fuel cells. Building off rules released in December 2021 for model years 2023 to 2026, the fleetwide light-duty standard would be at 82 grams per mile for model year 2032, down from a fleetwide 161 grams per mile by 2026, an equivalent of 40 mpg industry-wide. Other proposed alternatives put the standard at 72 grams and 92 grams per mile. A third has a more aggressive adoption early on during the period to get to the 82 grams per mile goal. Zaidi, during the briefing, emphasized that legislation has "reshaped the trend lines." Those measures include the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding 500,000 electric vehicle charging stations by 2030 and the Inflation Reduction Act that incentivizes EV purchases and investment for their assembly, parts manufacturing and material sourcing in North America. The Biden administration expects capacity for the assembly of 13 million EVs by 2030. "Time and time again, I think folks have bet against the ingenuity of American workers and American industry to continue to deliver products that will help us lead the world in the clean energy economy," Zaidi said. "I think they, frankly, lag the physical reality that we're seeing be built up based on private investment that's going into the system." He noted the role of economic development in the move to zero-emission vehicles and said it should "lift up our communities and strengthen our workers, be shoulder to shoulder with them, as they organize for rights and benefits." At least one automaker applauded the proposal. Chris Nevers, senior director of environmental policy at Rivian Automotive Inc., said in a statement that the EV startup will urge for the strongest possible standards. "The vehicle emissions standards proposed today," he said, "are a critical addition to the administration’s climate portfolio, and we applaud the realistic goals set forward in the headline targets." Biden's 2021 rules reversed a standard put in place by former President Donald Trump's administration by boosting requirements by 25%. The rules were also 5% higher than a proposal Biden's EPA had made that summer. The new proposal likely won't be without its hurdles. Texas, joined by 15 other states, last month challenged the EPA's regulatory rollbacks of the Trump administration rules. The proposal released Wednesday won't ban gas car sales — the administration has supported California's authority to set its own emissions standards but has not said it would support a federal policy similar to that of California's state policy that will ban new gas-powered car sales by 2035. It, however, has set a goal to reduce the nation's greenhouse gas emissions by 50% from 2005 levels by 2030 in accordance with the Paris Agreement that is seeking to limit the rise in average global temperature to under 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius). Because the transportation industry represents the largest amount of carbon emissions in the country, Margo Oge, former head of EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality, who now advises nonprofits and manufacturers on zero-emission transportation, said during a webinar, "these regulations will reflect, in my view, the single most important regulatory initiative by the Biden administration to combat climate change and to really reduce the worst outcomes of climate change." Automakers typically start developing vehicles three to six years in advance and have shared targets to end the sale of gas-powered vehicles. General Motors Co.'s aspiration date is by 2035. The goal for the U.S. is included in Jeep maker Stellantis NV's 2038 carbon net-zero ambition. Ford Motor Co. has pledged to end the sale globally of ICE vehicles by 2040. Chester France, the EPA's former Assessment and Standards Division director responsible for the development of national vehicle emission standards who now is a consultant to the Environmental Defense Fund, said he is optimistic that the industry will meet and even exceed expectations. The question for the regulators is what the trajectory of adoption will look like, which will be a part of the conversation with stakeholders during public comments, Regan said. "The regulatory policy," France said during a webinar, "has a role in providing that certainty, providing that market signal to make sure that all these things fit together." The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most major automakers selling vehicles in the United States, released a memo last week noting that car companies are invested in the EV transition. Automakers will have spent $1.2 trillion on vehicle electrification by 2030, the group said, and multiple manufacturers have set goals to be EV-only by 2040. But the group argued that requiring automakers to spend more on reducing emissions from gas-powered cars may slow progress toward that goal. "Every dollar invested in internal combustion technology is a dollar not spent on zero carbon technology," the Alliance wrote. "Requiring large investments for incremental gains from gas-powered engines come at the expense of where our collective focus ought to be: electrification." Environmental groups such as the Center for Biological Diversity have argued the administration should adopt the most stringent regulations possible: Ones that would reduce carbon dioxide pollution by at least 75% by 2030, including by requiring pollution reductions from gas-powered cars. "Biden needs to set standards that force the industry to do what they won’t do otherwise," the group wrote in an opinion piece published Friday. "Rapidly ratchet up sales of EVs, hold the line on polluting crossover SUVs and clean up the millions of new gas-powered vehicles they’ll sell in the meantime." The EPA rules also offer standards for medium-duty vehicles as well as heavy-duty trucks like commercial delivery vans and semis. It forecast that medium-duty EV penetration could reach 46% by 2032. The proposal originally had been expected to be announced in Detroit. The EPA cited a scheduling conflict for the move in location to the nation's capital, according to The New York Times. EPA's rulemaking is expected to be followed by a separate rule from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration later this year governing vehicles' miles-per-gallon efficiency. Those rules are known as Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards. |
Ford to invest $1.3B in Oakville, Breana Noble Ford Motor Co. is investing $1.3 billion (1.8 billion Canadian dollars) to transform its Oakville Assembly Plant in Ontario to assemble multiple electric vehicles and battery packs. The announcement makes due on a commitment reached in the Dearborn automaker's 2020 labor agreement with Unifor, the Canadian autoworkers' trade union. That included a $1.44 billion (1.95 billion Canadian dollars) investment into three plants in Ontario, including Oakville, which will be renamed the Oakville Electric Vehicle Complex. The plant will be the company's first high-volume transformation of an existing plant in North America to make EVs after Cuautitlán Assembly Plant in Mexico transitioned to build the Mustang Mach-E SUV. The Canadian investment is part of Ford's $50 million commitment to electrification by 2026, when it expects to have capacity to produce 2 million EVs globally. "The transition to EV production in Oakville will not only strengthen our business," Bev Goodman, Ford Canada CEO and president, said during a briefing conference call, "it will help deliver stable Canadian jobs." Oakville employs 3,000 people, and though salaried, skilled-trade and "some" production workers will continue work through the six-month transformation that begins in the second quarter of 2024, temporarily laid-off employees will be back before the end of next year, said Tony Savoni, plant manager. Production for delivery will begin in 2025. The plant is expected to return to roughly the same employment, though Savoni hedged the statement, noting it will depend on "market circumstances." Using the existing plant will allow production to start sooner and with an experienced manufacturing workforce, though employees will undergo on-the-job training in preparation for EV assembly. Details on which vehicles will replace the gas-powered Ford Edge and Lincoln Nautilus midsize SUVs and what their production would be were not available yet. The SUVs originally were planned to go out of production in 2023. The new vehicles will be built on Ford's next-generation electric vehicle platform. As a part of the Unifor agreement, Ford was expected to launch a fifth EV at the plant in 2028, though Goodman was unable to confirm if that still was the case. In addition to EVs, the plant will assemble their battery packs. The cells and arrays for those packs will come from Kentucky's $5.8 billion BlueOvalSK Battery Park that will begin operation in 2025. The 407,000-square-foot Oakville assembly site is made possible by improving the flow of parts and other equipment to be able to consolidate three body shops into one, said Dave Nowicki, director of manufacturing operations for Ford's battery and electric vehicles' Model e division. "Most EV companies aren't able to simultaneously create new manufacturing complexes while they transform existing ones," he said. "This kind of vertical integration drives incredible freight savings in timing efficiencies, even as we're delivering EVs at a very high scale." Ford's investment in Oakville as well as in Windsor Engine is being supported by $438 million (590 million Canadian dollars) in incentives from the Canadian federal and Ontario's provincial governments. It's only the latest project in the auto industry to get their support. Stellantis NV is constructing a $4.1 billion battery plant with LG Energy Solution in Windsor and has announced a total of $2.8 billion for updates to Brampton and Windsor assembly plants in addition to a new battery lab in Windsor. General Motors Co. is shipping electric delivery vans from CAMI Assembly in Ingersoll. "Ford’s investment in retooling its Oakville plant will support thousands of good paying jobs and is an important milestone in our plan to become a leader in the electric vehicle revolution,” Premier Doug Ford said in a statement. “Together, with our industry and union partners, we’re building up a world class, home grown electric vehicle supply chain, from mining to manufacturing, so that the vehicles of the future are built right here in Ontario, by Ontario workers." |
Here's how much Ford CEO Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley received nearly $21 million in total compensation in 2022 — down 8% from what he pocketed the year prior. The total compensation package that Farley, 60, earned last year included a base salary of $1.7 million, $15.1 million in stock awards, and nearly $2.8 million in bonuses. He received nearly $1.4 million worth of other compensation in the form of perks like the use of private aircraft and company vehicles. That's according to an annual proxy statement Ford filed Friday. Farley's total compensation amounted to 281 times the median annual total compensation of all Ford employees last year: $74,691. Farley's compensation package is down from 2021, his first full year as CEO, when he brought in $22.8 million in total compensation. That marked a 93% increase from 2020, when he became CEO in October after previously serving as chief operating officer. The company is required to report compensation packages for all of its top five named executives, which include Farley, Executive Chair Bill Ford Jr., Chief Financial Officer John Lawler, Ford Blue President Kumar Galhotra, and Doug Field, chief advanced product development and technology officer. Everyone except Field saw their total compensation decline from 2021, a reflection in part of bonus cuts aimed at fostering accountability after 2022 earnings came in below expectations. In a letter to shareholders, Bill Ford Jr. acknowledged that 2022 financial results, which included a $2 billion net loss, "did not meet our high expectations." "Although issues relating to cost and supply chain persist, we are addressing these challenges head on and moving with urgency to accelerate Ford’s transformation. I am confident in our Ford+ plan, our leadership, and our people," he wrote. "The road ahead is incredibly exciting. Our vehicles, technologies, and services continue to earn the enthusiasm of the public and trust of our customers across each of our three automotive businesses: Ford Blue, Ford Model e, and Ford Pro." Ford+ is the company's growth plan, centered on three separate business units dedicated, respectively, to combustion engine and hybrid vehicles; electric vehicles and software; and products and services for commercial customers. The company is investing $50 billion in electrification as it aims to reach an annual EV production rate of 2 million units by the end of 2026. Bill Ford Jr.'s total compensation was $17.3 million in 2022, down from $18.7 million in 2021. In 2021, Farley received a base salary of $1.7 million, stock awards worth just over $16 million and an incentive of $3.7 million for a total of $21.5 million in direct compensation. In addition, he received nearly $1.4 million in retirement and fringe benefits. His total remuneration was 356 times what the median employee earned, which was $64,003 that year. Lawler's total compensation was about $9 million in 2022. In 2021, his first full year as CFO, he received $9.4 million in total compensation in 2021 after Ford booked profits of $17.9 billion. In 2022, Lawler got a 12.4% raise, bringing his base salary to nearly $1.2 million from about $1 million the year before. Galhotra, who last year was tapped to head up Ford's internal combustion engine business unit, got a 2.7% raise in 2022, bringing his base salary to $1,062,950. His total compensation for the year was $8.2 million, down from nearly $9.3 million in 2021. For 2022, executives' annual bonuses were based on the company's performance on quality, adjusted pretax earnings, revenue and adjusted free cash flow. Their payout is based on a formula that includes their base salary, and multipliers including target opportunity, a business performance factor, and an individual performance factor. In the wake of the disappointing 2022 earnings report, the company cut annual bonuses for top executives as an accountability measure by reducing to 90% the business performance factor that goes into determining payouts. For 2022, the company exceeded its targets and the business performance factor was set at 148%; most salaried employees' bonus payouts were calculated using that multiplier. Farley, Bill Ford Jr. and Galhotra's individual performance factors were set at 90% last year. Field was rewarded for his individual performance with that multiplier being set at 110%, to reflect the progress he's led on Ford's EV and software business. In terms of total compensation for the year, Field brought in $15 million, up from $10.9 million last year, his first full year with the company. Rival General Motors Co. has not yet released its executive compensation numbers for 2022; its proxy statement will be filed at the end of April. In 2021, GM CEO Mary Barra was the highest-paid Detroit auto executive. Stellantis NV CEO Carlos Tavares' package that included direct compensation, incentives and other benefits last year, his second year leading the maker of Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles, was $24.8 million. |
Unifor Local 444 to celebrate By Adelle Loiselle Unifor Local 444 will welcome new members at TRQSS in a ceremony next week. Workers at the plant in Tecumseh reached out last year about membership in the city’s largest union local. Back in January, 600 new members at the seatbelt manufacturer joined Unifor Local 444. The union local said it was one of the largest organizing drives since the formation of Unifor. On Tuesday, the union and TRQSS officials will attend a one-day bargaining handover event at the Holiday Inn Select on Huron Church Road in Windsor. The union local said since TRQSS workers joined its ranks, other workplaces have contacted it about organizing. TRQSS opened in 1986 on Patillo Road and is one of the largest companies making seatbelts for the automotive industry. |
Ford sales up 10.1% in first Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. posted a strong first-quarter sales performance, making the Blue Oval the best-selling brand in the United States — but the automaker ceded its ranking in the increasingly competitive electric-vehicle segment amid gains by its crosstown rival. The Dearborn automaker's total U.S. sales, including both its Ford and Lincoln brands, rose 10.1% year-over-year to 475,906 vehicles. Ford brand sales grew 10.7%. But the company — at least for now — lost its No. 2 spot in the EV segment behind market leader Tesla Inc. due in part to production downtime for two of its key electric products. General Motors Co., meanwhile, reported selling about 20,000 EVs in the first quarter — nearly twice as many as Ford — amid strong demand for the Chevrolet Bolt after sales resumed following a recall for battery fire risk early last year. Ford's sales of 10,866 electric vehicles were up 41% from a year ago. The automaker currently has three EVs on the market: the F-150 Lightning pickup truck, the Mustang Mach-E crossover SUV, and the E-Transit cargo van. All three models have proven popular with customers, but Q1 sales were held back by production. Ford's Cuautitlan plant in Mexico that assembles the Mach-E was down for most of the first quarter as the automaker prepared the facility to boost production to hit a run rate of 210,000 vehicles by year's end. And production of the Lightning at the plant in Dearborn where it's built was down for five weeks in the first quarter as Ford worked through a battery issue. Ford reaffirmed Tuesday that it's on track to reach a run rate of 150,000 units for the Lightning this year. It's aiming to hit a global run rate of 600,000 EVs by the end of this year. "We are expanding our capacity to build more EVs this year and look to increase our sales as these capacity actions take place," Erich Merkle, Ford's U.S. sales analyst, said via email. Ford reported 4,291 sales in the first quarter of the Lightning, which went on sale last spring. Mach-E sales were down nearly 20% in Q1, which Ford attributed to the plant downtime. E-Transit sales were up 62.7% from a year ago. GM is on track to build about 50,000 EVs in the first half of the ear, and to double that in the second half, spokesperson David Caldwell said via email. He also noted the ramp-up of Cadillac Lyriq production, three straight record quarters for the Chevrolet Bolt EV and EUV, plus the launches later this year of the Chevy Silverado EV, Blazer EV and Equinox EV. "Our EV growth is happening and will continue to accelerate," Caldwell wrote. "Production is accelerating at our EV plants in Michigan and Tennessee, and that’s backed by production of battery cells by our Ultium Cells joint venture in Ohio. As that production continues to ramp-up, so will our growth." "Ford is off to a fast start to the year," Andrew Frick, Ford's vice president of sales, distribution and trucks, said in a statement. "Ford’s sales growth and investments are a direct result of strong customer demand across our truck, SUV, and electric vehicle segments. And this year’s highly anticipated new product launches with Super Duty, Escape, Mustang and Ranger, will only add to this momentum." Garrett Nelson, an equity analyst at CFRA Research, on Tuesday reiterated his "buy" opinion on Ford's stock. "Ford's U.S. sales are off to a strong start in '23, which we think reflects the momentum of its vehicle portfolio from models such as the Bronco (Q1 sales +38%), which continue to take market share from Jeep, and the ongoing ramp-up of the F-150 Lightning electric pickup," Nelson wrote in a research note. "Ford was one of the first to bring an electric pickup truck to market and we think will reap the benefits as evidenced by its strong reservation count," he added. "We also view Ford's EV growth strategy as the most prudent of the traditional automakers. While Ford's Q1 EV sales rose 41%, F-150 Lightning deliveries fell 37% from the Q4 total due to a production halt, underscoring risks automakers face as they attempt to execute aggressive EV production plans." The automaker — which is moving to boost production for a number of its popular vehicles — attributed the Blue Oval brand's growth to the popularity of the F-Series, Bronco and Mustang, as well as to strength in the commercial and electric vehicle segments. F-Series, sales of which were up 21.1%, helped drive growth of 19.6% in the lucrative truck segment. Meanwhile, Ford reopened order banks for the off-road-oriented Bronco SUV on March 27. The automaker pointed to the vehicle's 60% conquest rate to explain the strong sales performance in the first quarter, when Bronco was up 37.6%. Other Ford brand models that posted sales increases included: Bronco Sport (2.7%), Explorer (35.9%), Expedition (99.2%), and Maverick (11.6%). Sales of the EcoSport, Escape, Edge, and Ranger were down for the quarter. Lincoln sales dipped 1.1% from the first quarter of 2022. Sales of the Navigator were a bright spot, with 94.1% growth. Across the automaker's brands, sales of hybrid vehicles dipped 4.1% year-over-year while internal combustion engine vehicle sales were up 10.5%. Industrywide, first-quarter sales performances were mixed. GM on Monday reported that U.S. deliveries rose 17.6% to 603,208 in the first three months of 2023, with all of the Detroit automaker's brands posting year-over-year growth. U.S. sales, meanwhile, of Stellantis NV's Jeep SUVs, Ram pickup trucks and its other vehicles were down 9%. Chrysler and Dodge, both promoting the final model year of gas-powered models, were the only brands to see sales rise. Toyota Motor Corp.'s U.S. sales dropped 8.8% year-over-year. Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Corp. had record quarters with sales up 27% and 15%, respectively. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. saw 17.3% growth. Subaru Corp.'s sales were up 8.3%. |
Can the UAW Rise Again? ALEX N. PRESS Despite the ravages of deindustrialization, the United Auto Workers remain the US’s most important industrial union. Members recently elected a new leadership promising democracy, militancy, and an end to corruption. But change isn’t coming easy to the UAW. DETROIT — John Weyer remembers the day that he threw out his United Auto Workers (UAW) shirts. He started as a member of Local 1264 in 1995, taking a production job at the Sterling Stamping Plant in Sterling, Michigan. For the following two decades, he was a proud union member. Weyer saw the labor movement as a key part of building a better world. But by 2014, he realized that some of the UAW leaders to whom he had long looked up were deeply corrupt, spending members’ dues on extended lavish California vacations and luxury goods. “Think about how hard one of our nurses in Toledo on the midnight shift has to work for two and a half hours of her time a month to pay union dues,” said Weyer when I asked him why the corruption scandal that has roiled the union in recent years hit him so hard. “She’s cleaning somebody’s diaper, wiping somebody’s ass, and staying on her feet for twelve hours to pay those dues. Or think about the single mother who is working the second shift and can’t see her kids because they’re in school. How hard does she work for her dues? [The union’s leaders] were stealing that money from our members.” The loss of union pride was so devastating that he briefly saw a therapist to help him grieve. For years, he turned his focus elsewhere, to coaching youth sports. It was only in the lead-up to the most recent international leadership election that he became active in the union again. The election was the first in the UAW’s eighty-seven-year history in which international leadership would be directly elected by members rather than by delegates. The former system had been rife with favoritism, controlled by the Administration Caucus that had ruled the union and crushed internal dissent since it was created by the UAW’s most famous president, Walter Reuther. A federal monitor was appointed in the wake of a corruption scandal that landed twelve UAW officials, including two former presidents, in prison; the union agreed to hold a referendum on direct elections. In 2021, that referendum passed with 63 percent of ballots in favor. Shawn Fain, a local UAW official from Kokomo, Indiana, ran for president on a slate called UAW Members United. The slate was backed by Unite All Workers for Democracy (UAWD), an internal caucus that had formed in 2019 to push for direct elections. When the membership voted in favor of direct elections, the caucus decided to back challengers for seven seats on the international’s executive board under the slogan “No Corruption. No Concessions. No Tiers.” Weyer joined UAWD. He had known Fain since 2011. That year, Fain was on the negotiating team for the Stellantis (formerly Chrysler) contract, and Weyer was helping with social media, keeping members informed about the negotiations through Facebook. “When people would leave comments saying, ‘Oh, they’re trying to screw us. They don’t care,’ Shawn would respond,” said Weyer. “He’d say, ‘I’m a negotiator and I care, and here’s what we’re doing.’” The two stayed in touch. When Fain was sworn in as the new UAW international president on March 26, 2023, after a runoff election against incumbent Ray Curry that he won by fewer than five hundred votes, Weyer was at the ceremony. “When I found out that Shawn won, this weight that I didn’t even know I was carrying fell off my shoulders,” said Weyer. “I was just so proud. I was proud of my union.” After years of corruption and decades of decline, members like Weyer see immense possibilities for a fighting, democratic unionism free of corruption under Fain’s leadership. The UAWD-backed candidates won all seven executive board races, giving them the edge over the Administration Caucus’s six seats on the board (there is also one independent). But it’s easier to change a union president than it is to change a union culture — particularly one in which corruption has been the norm and internal democracy has been all but nonexistent. And if the UAW bargaining convention this week is any indication, the union reformers have a long road ahead of them. The Union Has Spoken When Fain took the stage at the start of the UAW’s Special Bargaining Convention on March 27, just twenty-four hours after swearing in as president, he opened by saying, “We’ve just witnessed the four most powerful words in a democracy: the people have spoken.” Fain was presiding over the gathering of roughly nine hundred delegates who had come to Detroit from around the country to determine the union’s priorities for negotiations with the Big Three automakers: Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis. Their four-year master contract, covering some 150,000 members, expires on September 14. The Big Three agreement once set the bar for auto manufacturing, and manufacturing work of all kinds, across the United States. The standards around pay, benefits, working conditions, and much more helped workers beyond the auto industry demand similar standards from their own employers. As deindustrialization has ravaged factory work and industrial union membership, that pace-setting role has diminished. The current UAW consists of four hundred thousand workers and six hundred thousand retirees — still the largest industrial union in the United States but down from its peak of around 1.5 million in 1979. Less than half of autoworkers in the United States are UAW, which significantly undermines the union’s bargaining power. The union is on track to lose even more market share as the electric vehicle (EV) industry grows: the Big Three have thus far managed to keep their EV operations out of the UAW’s master agreement, and where such shops are UAW, the workers are differently categorized, paid less and with fewer benefits. ‘We’re here to come together to prepare ourselves for the war against our only one and true enemy: multibillion-dollar corporations.’ As in other unions, concessionary bargaining and a shrinking membership went hand in hand with corruption, as UAW leaders, closer with management than with their rank-and-file members, managed the decline of their industry. The agreements left workers in an ever-worse position even as the leadership enriched themselves, securing resources for their personal fiefdoms and select allies in the union. The details of such corruption are almost cartoonish: a federal investigation found that senior officials had embezzled millions, spending it on, among other luxuries, golf outings and extended stays at a Palm Springs villa. According to the New York Times, union officials acquired enough “golf bags, sunglasses, shirts and ‘fashion shorts’” on these trips that they used a semitruck to ship the items home to Michigan. The bankruptcies at GM and Chrysler during the Great Recession accelerated the trend: autoworkers accepted once-unthinkable concessions, giving up cost-of-living-allowances (COLA) and accepting lower-paid tiers with worse benefits for new workers in their shops. With tiers came greater division: unity cannot be built in a shop where workers receive different pay and benefits for equal work. Now automakers are flush with profits, yet UAW members have not clawed back what they previously handed over. Fain’s election suggests that they may not be willing to accept such a raw deal any longer. “We’re here to come together to prepare ourselves for the war against our only one and only true enemy: multibillion-dollar corporations and employers who refuse to give our members their fair share,” said Fain from the stage. Dan Vicente, a UAWD member elected as Region 9 director straight from the shop floor of a manufacturing plant in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, said, “It’s time to get back what we gave up, and we’re not willing to negotiate from a place of no power. We make the products, we provide the services, we are the labor, so the ball is in management’s court. Membership wants us to go and get back what was taken, and that’s our intention.” Rhetorically, it’s a far cry from the friendly attitude toward employers that characterized Fain’s predecessors. The UAW under his leadership may be shifting away from a posture of accepting defeat and managing decline to that of a fighting union. But on the convention floor, it was easy to forget that UAW Members United won all leadership elections they contested. The attending delegates were elected in the spring of 2022, when Curry and the Administration Caucus still seemed untouchable. They’re the middle layer of the union, local leaders, many of whom have spent decades supporting the Administration Caucus. Often such loyalty was a strategy to ensure favorable treatment or career advancement; when one toils in the brutal conditions of an auto plant, decamping for the comparatively cushy environs of union staff can be a welcome prospect. When Fain first took the stage in Detroit, many delegates did not clap. By contrast, when Vice President Chuck Browning, now the union’s highest-ranking official from the Administration Caucus, was introduced, cheers rang out from the delegates of the room representing regions that voted for Curry. Browning comes out of the UAW’s Ford department, and very few of the union’s Ford locals went for Fain. Throughout the proceedings, mentions of Browning served as a proxy for the division between the old and new guard, a way for those who do not support the reformers to express their displeasure with the changes underway. As one delegate put it in response to a procedural change proposed by a UAWD delegate, “The rules have worked for us in the past, and we need to keep them the way they are.” Such resistance helped defeat a resolution to include COLA in initial bargaining proposals: opponents said it would “handcuff” bargaining committees. “Understand one thing when you look at that body of delegates: we have a seventy-year entrenched caucus that did a phenomenal job in the past of getting delegates elected who support their cause or support their issues,” said Fain when pressed on the palpable division on the convention floor. “Those delegates were elected prior to the last convention, so it’s still a very pro–Administration Caucus delegation. But if you look at the election, and you look at where the membership is, I think it’s two different stories.” He and his fellow reformers won’t be able to rely on such delegates when building support for their more aggressive agenda: not only clawing back COLA and job security, eliminating tiers, rolling EV plants into the master agreement, and ending the prolonged temporary status for new workers, but pushing for thirty-hour workweeks, building cross-border solidarity with workers abroad, expanding health care coverage to include reproductive care, and gaining the right to strike an employer nationally over plant closures. While some staff and local leaders who supported Curry will get on board with Fain, others will refuse to cooperate, either doing the bare minimum or actively sabotaging reformers’ efforts, hoping to weather the four years of his term until the next leadership elections. (Reporters who diligently tried to speak with Curry supporters, including me, did not have much luck, though Jane Slaughter and Keith Brower Brown at Labor Notes had some success.) Changing course will require Fain and his allies to go directly to the members, speaking to them at the worksite and the plant gates, building their confidence and the unity that prior leadership systematically undermined. A telling change was apparent from the moment the convention opened: at previous gatherings, staff liaisons choreographed the proceedings by handing certain delegates scripted statements and coordinating with the leadership on stage to determine who to call on and in what order. Delegates were often handed a colored envelope, which they would then hold up; those on the stage would look out and see the envelope, knowing to call on that person next. At this year’s gathering, there were no liaisons on the floor. Not everyone was happy about the unprecedentedly democratic nature of the convention. Late one evening, I was speaking with a well-known reformer. We had been interrupted repeatedly by fellow delegates who wanted to shake his hand, some of whom were supporters of the old guard but wanted to show their respect. But one man approached us and quickly became belligerent. When the reformer calmly responded, saying, “OK, thank you, brother,” the man shouted, “I’m not your brother. Don’t ever call me your brother.” He made his opinions about the reform caucus clear: “Fuck you and fuck that UAWD shit and go to hell.” A Union That Still Strikes Despite such resistance, there are factors in reformers’ favor. The UAW was built through strikes. The 1936 Flint sit-down strike is the union’s origin story, and while much in the auto industry has changed in the intervening years, assembly lines still can’t function without workers. UAW members still strike — strike-authorization votes generally pass by an overwhelming margin. But under previous leadership, strikes were top-down affairs. Leadership might inform workers that they would be striking, without offering much information beyond how to access strike pay. In this model, workers are passive recipients of leadership’s diktats and kept in the dark about the bargaining process rather than included in a contract campaign to pressure the employers. Yet when the day came to walk out, members still downed their tools — even in 2019, when a major corruption probe was announced just weeks before an auto strike. Indeed, one of the few resolutions to be pulled out of committee and adopted at the convention concerns honoring picket lines; supporters cited a 2019 incident in which GM workers were told to cross the picket line of striking Aramark workers who were members of their locals. The Teamsters have the right to respect picket lines in their contracts, and the UAW members want that too. The task ahead for reformers is to make use of that militant tradition, shaking off the decades of stultifying Administration Caucus rule that have carefully managed it and placing it once again in the hands of the rank and file. The resolution about honoring picket lines was a UAWD priority. Another concerning inclusive bargaining units in higher education passed as well. The UAWD delegation only numbered around fifty or so, a small minority, but their mood was celebratory, even jubilant. That they managed to get a handful of resolutions pulled out of committee, and pass several, means that the caucus is winning over additional members, building toward a majority in favor of a union that goes on the offensive. Upon stopping by the conference room that operated as UAWD headquarters at the end of the convention’s first day, Fain teared up: “I’m so proud to be a member of this caucus.” When he came to the caucus’s happy hour at a nearby bar later that evening, he stayed so long chatting with members that his staff began arguing about how to get him to leave in time to be well-rested for the following day. It’s a dynamic without comparison in recent US union history. While the Teamsters just elected Sean O’Brien, a challenger to former president James P. Hoffa’s preferred candidate, as international president, O’Brien is not a member of Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU, a union reform caucus). O’Brien and TDU worked together to oust the Hoffa regime, and the alliance remains intact as the union prepares for a possible strike at UPS this summer. But for a reform caucus to win the presidency as well as several seats on the international executive board in the first direct election in UAW history is a different story. “There’s a fire in the labor movement, and this election is just a reflection of that,” said Vicente, the Region 9 director. “We have independent unions across this country popping up left and right. The Teamsters are reforming, the UAW is reforming, and we see ourselves not just as the directors of these regions now, but as militants in a labor movement that’s going to have to fight back against the corporations that have reaped untold amounts of wealth off of our backs.” Fain’s victory was nail-bitingly close, and turnout was dismally low. But the reformers’ sweep is a mandate for those who want to return the UAW to its former outsized role. Much like the Teamsters must organize Amazon and other nonunion competitors if they’re to survive, so too must the UAW find a way to break through in nonunion auto plants. If the union doesn’t aggressively organize EV plants in particular, it is setting itself up for further decline. Allowing automakers to keep their joint-venture battery plants outside of the master agreement ensures that such work will be compensated at a significantly lower rate. Asked about this problem, Fain acknowledged it, describing the union as “already behind in this battle.” “I know that I have a vested interest in keeping gasoline engines around as long as possible because there are a lot of jobs involved,” said Dan Denton, who works in the jeep unit of the Stellantis Assembly Plant in Toledo, Ohio. He noted that he and his coworkers still enjoy far better wages and benefits than are on offer in the area’s other jobs. For Denton, EVs raise the specter of fewer auto mechanic jobs and the loss of the engine line in an assembly plant. But he wants the UAW to take the lead in planning the transition and ensure that workers in plants that shutter have somewhere to go. Said Denton, “We have to figure out something to do with the wrench-turners like me who we won’t need anymore.” The UAW is the largest union for manufacturing workers in the United States, but it is also the largest for graduate student workers. UAWD reflects such cross-sector membership, and the caucus’s room at the convention offered a rebuke to concerns about whether grad students and autoworkers can coexist in the same union. The first time I stopped by, a Harvard grad student and an autoworker were discussing a resolution about pensions. While the grad student noted that the issue wasn’t particularly relevant for her, she was helping strategize about how to pass the resolution. She suggested resolution language members could cite to make the strongest argument. “I do my homework,” she explained, eliciting appreciative laughter from the manufacturing workers in the room. When I mentioned the graduate union members to Vicente, he called them an invaluable asset. “As an auto worker in manufacturing, when I found out that we have grad students, I was shocked,” said Vicente. “But then I also thought, why have we never talked to these dudes? You hear the words ‘Harvard graduate,’ and it’s like, ‘Oh my God, these are the most highly educated people in the world. We should be tapping into that resource.’ Then you meet them and they have a wealth of knowledge, and they’ve been able to help us to try to organize ourselves.” A Union That Goes Beyond the Factories The UAW once not only set standards for the labor movement, but also put its heft behind other movements. Many of the most important progressive developments of the twentieth century outside of the labor movement have involved the UAW. Reuther was friends with Martin Luther King Jr and spoke at the March on Washington — the union paid the bill for numerous aspects of the rally that day — and Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) leaders wrote the Port Huron statement on UAW property. Many of the most important progressive developments of the twentieth century outside of the labor movement have involved the UAW. In his opening remarks, Fain quoted from Martin Luther King Jr’s final book, Where Do We Go From Here?, written the year before King’s assassination. At the time, the civil rights movement had won the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but economic and political discrimination persisted, and the movement was debating what to do next. Wrote King: We have left the realm of constitutional rights and we are entering the area of human rights. The Constitution assured the right to vote, but there is no such assurance of the right to adequate housing, or the right to adequate income. . . . Achievement of these goals will be a lot more difficult and require much more discipline, understanding, organization, and sacrifice. “Dr. King’s words resonate with us today,” said Fain from the stage: Our union is moving from rights on paper to rights in action. We’ve won the right to vote for our top leadership. We have the right to strike. We have the right to a grievance procedure. We have the right to arbitration, to collective bargaining. But we have not yet won the rights that will fundamentally change this union and change this country. We’ve not yet won racial and economic justice in the workplace for all of our members. We’ve not yet won equal pay for equal work with an end to tiers in our contracts that divide our members. We’ve not yet won an end to plant closures that destroy our working-class communities and tear our families and our members’ lives apart. We’ve not yet won a higher education system that creates good jobs and provides free education as a public good. We’ve not yet won retirement security and health care and pensions for all. We’ve not yet won rights on the job for the hundreds of thousands of unorganized auto workers and millions of other workers across the country. Not yet, but I believe we will. Three of Fain’s grandparents were UAW members, and he sees himself as part of a movement that has been decades in the making. While he has won the top seat, he knows that achieving reformers’ expansive vision will take much more work. In speaking with me about his victory’s lineage, he mentioned New Directions, a 1980s reform movement within the union. New Directions managed to get one of its founders, Jerry Tucker, elected as Region 5 director, but the Administration Caucus blocked him at every turn. By the time he was officially installed as director after a rerun election in 1988, two years after the original vote, he had a mere nine months left in his term. The staff who were meant to be under his direction spent that time resisting his vision and preparing to unseat him, an attempt at which they were ultimately successful. View of a Civil Rights demonstrator as he holds a sign that reads “UAW (United Auto Workers) Says: Registration, Constitution, Yes; Segregation, Jim Crow, No” near a tent during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Washington, DC, August 28, 1963. (Roosevelt H. Carter / Getty Images) Members of New Directions were present at this year’s convention, organizing with UAWD. Stopping by the UAWD room at the convention center, I found longtime union reform activists Mike Cannon, Wendy Thompson, Diane Feeley, Judy Wraight, Bill Parker, Ron Lare, and Frank Hammer in discussion with younger autoworkers and graduate students. On the convention’s second day, Cannon and Hammer led a discussion of New Directions. One UAWD member came straight from his shift at the Dearborn Truck Plant to attend; he was still wearing his jumpsuit. As New Directions faded, the holdouts, largely retirees, formed the Autoworker Caravan, which kept the dissident spirit alive by criticizing concessionary contracts and creating leaflets to help members organize against the givebacks. In 2010, having run for delegate for the first time and won, Scott Houldieson, a Local 551 member at Ford’s Chicago Assembly plant since 1989, saw a flyer for a meeting in the Detroit area just before that year’s constitutional convention. The purpose was to discuss the recent concessions; he decided to check it out. Houldieson hadn’t always been a rabble-rouser, but local corruption and concessionary contracts — the 2007 agreement that introduced tiers and the 2009 contract that suspended COLA — irked him. When he walked into the hotel room where the 2010 meeting was taking place, he was greeted warmly. “Until that time, I had no clue what New Directions was,” said Houldieson. “Nobody talked about it in my plant, or if they did, it was in whispers.” He joined the Autoworker Caravan. They were lonely years, but Houldieson was determined to fight back against concessionary contracts, even if it meant battling the Administration Caucus. He became a familiar presence at UAW conventions, speaking up from the floor so often that at the 2023 convention, seemingly every elected official on stage knew him. When a handful of members began discussing a push for direct elections in 2019, the nucleus of what would become UAWD, Houldieson was there. Houldieson, who is currently the chair of UAWD’s steering committee, was ebullient about his caucus’s achievements at the convention: “We’ve exceeded our expectations and punched way above our weight class. All we really want is union democracy so we can make decisions on behalf of the membership at this convention. We don’t want top-down strategy because look where it got us. The membership doesn’t want to go there again.” “The UAW Wasn’t Founded by Asking for Permission” “This week, I’ve heard some talk about what we can’t do, about what the law says or about this or that subject of bargaining,” said Fain in his closing remarks on the final day of the convention: “And the law has its place. But the UAW wasn’t founded by asking for permission. The founders of this union didn’t wait for the law. They didn’t worry about the law. They wanted their dignity, and they wanted their fair share, and they did what the hell they had to do to get it.” The founders of this union didn’t wait for the law. They didn’t worry about the law. Applause broke out at several points in the speech, and by the end, almost the entire delegation was on its feet. Such unity was helped by a signal from the stage: earlier in the day, Browning, the vice president and Administration Caucus member, said that they would not go into negotiations as a divided union. “Let’s support our president and International Executive Board,” he told the crowd. One reformer did his part to encourage such unity by standing behind the delegates from one of the most recalcitrant UAW regions, loudly shaming them into standing up. After the convention concluded, I made my way to the UAWD room for a debrief. Weyer was standing outside the door. When I asked him how he felt now that the convention was over, he smiled. “I’m optimistic. Aren’t you?”
|
Retiree Keith White Passes Away April 2, 2023
It is with great sadness that we inform you of the passing of Keith Retired from Ford on Oct 1, 1999 with 27 years of service. Keith was always a friendly and easy-going guy and had a Our sincerest condolences go out to all his family and friends. His Funeral will take place on Saturday April 8th at 1:30 at There will be a private viewing for family from 12:00 to 12:30 and then There will be a reception afterwards at the Flesherton Legion.
|
Auto Workers Convention Lurches Keith Brower Brown and Jane Slaughter April 1, 2023 The brand-new leaders of the United Auto Workers are making ambitious demands but face stiff organizing challenges as they seek to jump-start the union, ahead of a momentous contract expiration this September at Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis (formerly Chrysler). At the union’s Detroit convention this week, hundreds of delegates–often local leaders–signaled they were less ready than the members to welcome the reform leadership. But there was unanimity that it’s time to finally recoup the divisive contract concessions granted in the 2007-2009 recession. Under those contracts the then-ailing automakers were allowed to hire new workers at close to half pay and no pension. On the first day, new President Shawn Fain called for union members to fight for a decisive end to years of givebacks and retreat. “We are here to come together for the war against our one and only true enemy — the multibillion-dollar corporations and employers who refuse to give our members their fair share,” Fain said. On unifying the membership he added, “I don’t give a damn who you voted for. We are going to come together. We’re going to stop taking scraps—we are going to fight.” At first, any statements from Fain or his team met a grumbling reception from a majority of delegates, aligned with the outgoing administration. But on the third day, Vice President Chuck Browning, the highest official now elected from the long-reigning Administration Caucus, said from the stage, “I hear worries we're going to be a divided house going into negotiations, but that's not true… Let's support our President and International Executive Board.” Following that signal, Fain's closing call to bring a unified fight against “corporate America… starting right now!” received a standing ovation from nearly all delegates. LANDMARK TEST FOR UAW The UAW is the largest U.S. union for manufacturing workers—and for graduate student workers. It historically set a high bar for union contracts across the nation, based on a record of militant strikes and sit-downs. But beginning in the late 1970s, the UAW became a vanguard of concessions and labor-management partnership, and saw a wave of plant closures that slashed membership. With the election breakthrough by a rank-and-file caucus, the UAW is set for a landmark test of how union reformers, both at the very top and in the ranks, will be able to turn the course of a major industrial union. From the convention, some speedbumps are apparent: hesitant middle layers of the union, inexperience with the very idea of a contract campaign against employers, and most of all, hostile employers used to getting their way. Fain, head of the Members United slate and a member of the Unite All Workers for Democracy (UAWD) caucus, was sworn in 24 hours before the convention opened. STRIKE THREAT LOOMS LARGE The UAW's Bargaining Conventions are held every four years as the “Big 3” automaker contracts near expiration. They are intended for locally elected delegates to guide the hand of the union's bargaining teams, at least officially. In practice, bargaining conventions have typically placed a lukewarm rubberstamp on a 50-page “omnibus” resolution of vague bargaining goals passed down by leaders. After raucous debate and a big bump in strike pay (to start day one, rather than day eight) made headlines at last July's constitutional convention, reformers hoped this convention would set militant goals. But with new leaders fully taking office just a day before the convention, delegates had to start from bargaining resolutions assembled under direction of the outgoing officials. On tiers, delegates approved a sweeping resolution calling on leaders to “reject management proposals which seek to divide the membership through tiered wages (or) benefits," with an "obligation to seek the elimination of all such tiers." The official resolution adopted this language verbatim from a July constitutional amendment offered by the UAWD caucus. The strong rejection of tiers reflected widespread outrage among auto workers. Luigi Gjokaj, a delegate from Stellantis Mack Assembly in Detroit, said, “The elephant in the room is a huge part of us don't get a pension or retirement health care anymore, for the same job.” Dan Maloney, a local president from a New York auto parts plant, said, “It's time for us to get rid of the two-tier system. I look forward to us getting that done in this round of bargaining.” Delegates approved a few proposals brought from the floor, continuing the spirit of democracy newly evident at the July convention. With broad support in voice votes, UAWD resolutions passed that will demand the contractual right not to cross the picket lines of other unions, and move towards a wall-to-wall organizing strategy in higher education. One delegate, an auto electrician, successfully proposed a bargaining demand to restore skilled trade classifications that were cut in prior concessions. Companies have combined trades in order to cut jobs. On many official resolutions, delegates frequently stood to say they approved—but that their leaders needed to demand even more. Plant closures have decimated UAW membership, like Stellantis’s shuttering of an assembly plant in Belvidere, Illinois, less than a month before the convention, leaving over 1,300 out of work. A video eulogized the loss of the plant with tearful worker interviews and wistful guitar plucking. Soon after, an official resolution pledged to gain more “investment commitments" from companies for UAW plants, through “increased involvement” with corporate planning and “cooperation” to gain government aid. For some auto workers, this sounded like not nearly enough. Crystal Pasarcik, from Stellantis Sterling Heights Assembly, rose to support the motion, but asked pointedly, “Why doesn't this mention plant closures? What are we going to do to fight?” Mike Grimmer, a shop chairman from GM's Tonawanda Engine Plant, added, “We have to stop begging. When the company threatens to take jobs away, that won't work.” ELECTRIC TRANSITION A transition to electric vehicles looms for the UAW, as Big 3 executives pledge to largely shift to the new drivetrains by the end of this decade. So far, U.S. companies plan to build these cars either with non-union labor in “joint ventures,” or with union contracts at lower tiers of pay. The official omnibus resolution committed to “embrace this change” towards electric vehicles with enhanced training and a demand for “improved compensation and job security" on jobs to come. Again, delegates rose to say they wanted a more assertive plan. A delegate from a Stellantis plant in Ohio demanded, “I want this to add battery plants. I know you all want to make them UAW, but they can't just be second-tier supplier jobs. We need to stand up to that.” Mike Shuckwith, an electrician in a Michigan local that has grown with battery work, said, “I'm scared shitless of this push by GM to go all electric. We need it all in-house.” That echoed pledges from Fain to demand all electric vehicle work at joint ventures be brought under the new UAW contracts this fall. Work schedule demands became an emotional subject. Dan Gilson, from Local 14 at GM in Toledo, rose to oppose the official work schedules proposal. “We can be forced to work 12- to 14-hour days. We can be forced every weekend. This has caused so much dissension in my plant, I can’t go back to them and say this language was all [we got]. I see [GM CEO] Mary Barra talking about family life. What the hell do you know about family life–you aren’t being forced to work!” Debate on proposals proposed from the floor was something new for UAW conventions, continuing the openness established last July. This time, Fain barred international staff “liaisons” from working the floor, who in past conventions had shepherded delegates with pre-made talking points and a watchful eye. Martin Tutwiler, a reform supporter from the GM Warren Tech Center, said that even when it wasn't going their way, “the new leadership is letting the membership lead the convention. Any time you have a change in power, people are going to speak up.” RAW FEELINGS The convention revealed raw edges remaining from the election campaign, in which all seven reform challengers defeated members of the Administration Caucus (AC), the group that has ruled the union since 1946. (UAWD-supported candidates now fill seven International Executive Board seats, including four of the top five spots, to the AC’s six members, plus one independent reformer.) But the convention delegates were elected in spring 2022, before members voted on officers in the fall. Delegates have traditionally been local officers. With little membership interest in the delegate elections, the AC has easily dominated convention votes. That was mostly true at this week’s convention as well. The majority of delegates refused to hear out UAWD's resolutions on Big 3 strike preparation and on bringing workers in new electric vehicle plants into top-tier contracts. On the first two days, these issues fell just short of the one-sixth share of delegate support needed to enter debate. Another of UAWD’s top priorities did receive enough support to make it onto the floor: restoring cost-of-living adjustments to contracts. Their resolution asked that COLA be a part of initial bargaining proposals. Opponents, though, urged delegates to “respect the Resolutions Committee,” which had not prioritized COLA, and not to “hamstring our bargainers.” The resolution failed 311-191. On the second day, some delegates began booing at the mere mention of the name UAWD. Linda Jackson of Local 7 in Detroit said that she and others were rubbed the wrong way when UAWD delegates mentioned their affiliation from the mikes, feeling it dragged out the election acrimony. “The Administration Caucus was a silent divider,” Jackson said. “UAWD is a physical divider, because you hear it.” Another delegate, to much applause, declared his loyalty to “UAW with nothing on the end.” Kim Janeski, financial secretary of Local 931 at Ford near Detroit, said that UAWD wanted to “break the system” and “wants change for change’s sake,” citing “endless debate, endless resolutions” and lack of experience. She was disdainful of newly elected regional director Dan Vicente, who until last week was a worker on the shop floor. “There are certain protocols,” Janeski said. “We’re in a seniority system–we work our way up.” Asked how she thought Fain would approach negotiations, Janeski said he would be “obnoxiously aggressive.” She cited his opening remarks at the convention, in which he said, “Let’s get ready to rumble!” Janeski interpreted that as a rumble with AC members, not the companies. (Fain actually said, “The rumble of the election is finished” and called on members to unite against the employers.) Amid that grudging reception of new leaders, some supporters of the outgoing officers said they were keeping an open mind. Pat Greca, a retiree still active with her local at Ford Rawsonville near Detroit, said, “My plant went from 6,000 when I started to 600 members today. Our union, we have to evolve, or else we might die. I see these new folks talk the talk, and I'll see if they'll walk the walk.” Darin Gilley, an officer at a GM local in Wentzville, Missouri, said he thought “sour grapes won’t play well back home” and that he was already getting texts from members wondering why COLA was voted down. “Political differences are one thing,” he said, “it’s the paycheck difference that matters”—what the union wins in the next contracts. CHALLENGES AHEAD FOR CONTRACT CAMPAIGN Unlike in some workplaces, it's rarely been difficult to convince Big 3 UAW members to vote for and honor a strike. Strike votes are typically 98 percent ‘yes’ and there is virtually no crossing the picket line, even in right-to-work states. But also unlike many other unions, the UAW has never run a contract campaign at the Big 3. That is, there’s never been an attempt to involve members in actions that let management know they are serious about the issues, or start pressuring the bottom line before a strike. Instead, members usually learned a few hours before the strike that they were to hit the bricks, and picket duty was assigned. Members were not told specific goals of the strike, nor let in on progress of negotiations. With little preparation beforehand, 48,000 members struck General Motors when the last contract expired in fall 2019. They stayed out for 40 days with disappointing results. This year, the new UAW leadership has promised to involve members in a way that will unite them, and let them show the automakers what they’re willing to strike for. As Secretary-Treasurer Margaret Mock, elected with the Members United slate, said in her address, “The UAW will call on the efforts of every rank-and-file member, as well as every leader, to win back all the givebacks since the UAW fell into the concessions trap in the 1980s… We will rely on the fighting spirit of the rank and file that even 40 years of concessions have not extinguished.” “They are proud to go out, they understand they have power they can use,” said Shana Shaw, a member at GM’s plant in Wentzville, Missouri. “They are ready and willing to go out—they just need to know the in-between,” how to get active in a contract campaign. A first step will be a bargaining survey distributed in the plants. Phil Reiter, from Toledo Jeep, planned to tell his members, “Don't work on break. We've got to show them we won't do any favors.” Reiter wasn't a delegate, but had driven up to witness how new leaders would change the union's course. “It's going to be tough at Stellantis,” he said. “Management is always talking cuts, cuts, cuts, and then they complain about quality. We're at least 75 percent Tier Two or less in my plant. With this new leadership, I'm hopeful we're finally heading in the right direction. I don't see them giving us a BS tentative agreement. That's why I voted for them.”
|
Ford invests in Indonesian Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. is partnering with mining companies from Indonesia and China to invest in a nickel-processing project as part of the Dearborn automaker's bid to shore up supplies of key raw materials for electric-vehicle batteries. PT Vale Indonesia Tbk, a nickel producer in Indonesia, and China's Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt Co. on Thursday announced the deal with Ford, which involves all three companies taking equity stakes in the Pomalaa Block High-Pressure Acid Leaching, or HPAL, Project in Indonesia. The project represents a $4.5 billion investment, according to media reports. Ford did not disclose how much it was investing. As competition in the automotive industry's EV shift intensifies, automakers increasingly are making investments to control their supply chains, including raw materials that are expensive and in short supply. Additionally, the critical mineral deposits often are found in countries far from North America, where mining and mineral processing encounter stiff regulatory resistance — especially in the United States. Stellantis NV CEO Carlos Tavares said Wednesday he's not sure there will be enough raw materials to replace the existing fleet of fossil fuel-powered vehicles with all-electric vehicles. And Ford's crosstown rival General Motors Co. has purchased equity stakes in the mining industry as it aims to secure its raw materials supply. The project will process ore from a PT Vale Indonesia mine to produce mixed hydroxide precipitate, or MHP, a nickel product used in EV batteries. The companies said the venture — which is slated to begin commercial operations in 2026 — could produce up to 120 kilotons per year of MHP. Construction on the plant began late last year. For Ford, the deal is aimed at locking up raw materials for EV batteries as it pushes to reach a 2 million EV production run rate by the end of 2026. The automaker said in a news release that the project, combined with a separate supply agreement it's working on with Huayou for a precursor cathode active material needed to make lithium-ion batteries as well as with its other nickel supply deals, will "significantly (contribute) to support its EV production targets by the end of 2026." "This framework gives Ford direct control to source the nickel we need — in one of the industry's lowest-cost ways — and allows us to ensure the nickel is mined in line with our company's sustainability targets, setting the right (environmental, social and corporate governance) standards as we scale," Lisa Drake, Ford's vice president of EV industrialization, said in a statement. Indonesia, where investment has been growing as the southeast Asian country with the world's largest nickel reserves and a ban on raw nickel exports, is not one of nearly two dozen countries with which the U.S. shares a free trade agreement.That’s significant if Ford wants the minerals to help their vehicles qualify for heavy consumer discounts. New EV tax credits passed through the Inflation Reduction Act require batteries be built with at least 40% of the value of their minerals coming from the United States or a country it shares a free trade agreement with, with the percentage increasing every year.The new rules have proven a source of tension for the Biden administration — on Capitol Hill, with international allies and with such global automakers as Ford and GM.After initial frustrations over the legislation from the European Union and Japan, the Biden administration has been working to ink critical mineral deals that would allow the allied nations to qualify, despite lacking a formal free trade agreement. A deal with Japan was announced earlier this week.But those efforts have drawn blowback from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress, who complain that the Biden administration is exceeding its authority and going around Congress jn building such deals. To support its $50 billion electrification plan, Ford has been moving to lock up its supplies of EV components and the raw materials needed to make them. “Battery cell manufacturing capacity is the foundation of our EV business. And to support it, we are now building out supply chains — just as we said we would — going deeper than ever before to secure the raw materials that are necessary," Drake said last July, when the automaker said it had secured 100% of the battery capacity it needs to hit its EV production targets through the end of this year. "We have direct-sourced our lithium and nickel to scale battery production more quickly and keep the volumes and the costs more stable over time.” At that time, the company said it had secured most of the nickel it needs through 2026 and said it was "exploring" the three-way nickel processing project that was made official this week. |
Ford just made this type Transit Connect van being discontinued By Gary Gastelu Ford has confirmed that it is discontinuing the Transit Connect compact van at the end of 2023. The model is popular among small and urban business owners as both a utility and delivery vehicle, and was the last of its kind. The Ram Promaster City, Nissan NV200 and NV200-based Chevrolet City Express it once competed against have all been pulled from the market in recent years. Ford introduced the Transit Connect to the U.S. for the 2010 model year and sales reached 52,221 in 2015, when the larger Transit was launched alongside it. It's been available in panel and passenger versions, but just 25,140 of the Spanish-built vehicles were sold in the U.S. last year. A Ford spokesperson told Automotive News that the decision was due to "efforts to reduce global manufacturing cost and complexity, alongside decreased demand for the compact van segment." The Transit has been the best-selling large van since it went on sale. It is offered in several sizes and available in electric versions called the E-Transit. The Ford Maverick compact pickup also became available in 2022 and has become part of the Ford Pro commercial lineup, targeting some of the same customers that might otherwise buy the Transit Connect. This brings Ford full-circle as the Transit Connect was long touted as an alternative to a small pickup, which Ford was missing from its lineup from 2012 until the Ranger returned in 2019. Ford will continue to sell the Transit Connect in Europe and other markets. |
'It's a new day in the UAW': Jordyn Grzelewski March 28, 2023 Detroit — Just a little over 24 hours into his presidency, Shawn Fain opened the United Auto Workers' Special Bargaining Convention by declaring that the union is "ready to get back in the fight." Fain, a challenger candidate who was sworn in as president Sunday after a lengthy runoff election that ended with him narrowly ousting former President Ray Curry, also called for unity to face the real "enemy" — the employers — during brief remarks to open the convention Monday at Huntington Place. The three-day event drew hundreds of UAW delegates from across the country to determine the union's bargaining priorities ahead of crucial contract negotiations with the Detroit automakers later this year. “The people have spoken. The rumble of the election is finished. Your new democratically elected International Executive Board has met … and we are united to serve you," Fain said. "Now, we’re here to come together to ready ourselves for the war against our one and only true enemy: multi-billion corporations and employers that refuse to give our members their fair share. It’s a new day in the UAW.” With the change at the helm of the UAW less than a day old, noticeable divisions emerged on the convention floor. Many delegates didn’t stand for Fain when he was introduced. Supporters of the Administrative Caucus that long ran the UAW periodically made their loyalties clear, heartily applauding Curry and many giving a standing ovation to Chuck Browning, who was re-elected as a vice president. The afternoon brought a lengthy, heated debate over ensuring cost-of-living adjustments — a benefit UAW workers lost in 2009 — as a priority during bargaining with General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. A motion, supported by the Unite All Workers for Democracy dissident caucus that backed Fain, was made to bring a resolution out of committee that would make COLA more of a central focus during negotiations. Scott Houldieson, UAWD steering committee chair and member of UAW Local 551 in Chicago, loudly claimed during the debate on the resolution that he’s ready to go on strike to get COLA back: “I’m ready to get my members ready to go on strike. We’re coming for ya. We want our COLA back." Houldieson got some of the crowd to chant with him: "No COLA, no contract. No COLA, no contract." Others questioned if COLA should be a top priority among many other issues the UAW will have to fight for this fall. Some delegates voiced concern that demanding the return of COLA would tie the bargaining teams' hands and make the union vulnerable to concessions in other places. Clarence E. Brown, president of Local 31 in Fairfax, Kansas, representing GM Fairfax Assembly workers, stood up during the debate over the COLA resolution to encourage trust in the bargaining teams selected: "Is there anything wrong with trusting the people we have elected? ... They're going to go in there and fight for everything you're talking about." Ultimately, the resolution failed 38% to 62%. Unity sought despite divisions In another signal that reform-minded members don't have full control over the union, a proposal from a UAWD member to increase the number of delegates needed to close debate on resolutions was shot down. Another UAWD proposal to lower the vote threshold needed to bring resolutions out of committee and onto the convention floor failed. In a post-convention press conference, Fain said he does not believe the differences on display Monday are reflective of how rank-and-file members feel. “We have a 70-year entrenched caucus that did a phenomenal job in the past of getting delegates elected that support their cause or their issues. Those delegates were elected prior to the last convention, so it’s a very pro-Administration Caucus delegation still," he said. "What you may have seen in there today, to me, is not indicative of where the membership is.” Robert Bickerstaff, president of Local 1435 representing workers at Stellantis NV's Toledo Machining plant, is hoping to get more work out of the next set of negotiations. He voted for Fain "because we needed change. It wasn't happening with the past administrations. The last probably three terms of presidents have not been doing their due diligence for our local union, our plant. The company's been chopping work out of our plant for the 10 years, and it's time to fight back." Fain declined to get into specific strategies his administration may be considering ahead of negotiations, but he said that job security and the end of tiered wage structures are top of mind. Members, he said, are ready to fight. During his convention speech, Fain sought to put the election behind the union and chart a path toward unity ahead of contract talks — even as he encouraged "spirited and forceful debate" among delegates. He leaned heavily on the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., drawing a parallel between the UAW's situation and divisions that emerged among Civil Rights leaders after key legislative victories had been secured in the mid-1960s. The convention brought together the union's new 14-member International Executive Board, made up of Fain, Secretary-Treasurer Margaret Mock (the union's first African American woman to serve in the role), three vice presidents and nine regional directors. Historically controlled by the Administrative Caucus, the first-ever direct elections of IEB members ushered in eight reform candidates. The Administrative Caucus held on to six seats. “You all have made history. For the first time, we as a union have had the courage to give all members the right to vote on our union’s direction," Fain said. "When given the chance to vote, the membership chose change. We’re choosing to fight.” Fain cited King's 1967 book "Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?" in which he detailed a vision for the future of the Civil Rights Movement in areas like affordable housing and pushing for higher wages for workers. “Dr. King’s words resonate with us today. Our union is moving from rights on paper to rights in action. We’ve won the right to vote for our top leadership. We have the right to strike. We have the right to a grievance procedure. We have the right to arbitration, to collective bargaining," Fain said. "But we have not yet won the rights that will fundamentally change this union and change this country." Some examples that he gave: a lack of racial and economic justice in workplaces, tiered wage structures in contracts, plant closures, and millions of workers in the U.S. who are not unionized. But Fain expressed optimism that the UAW has the tools it needs to achieve such lofty ambitions. "As Dr. King took stock of the Civil Rights Movement, he noted every revolutionary movement has its peaks of united activity and its valleys of debate," he said. "So brothers and sisters, let us debate the future of our union. And let us emerge from this valley of debate to our highest peak yet, and then let us move forward as the UAW — united.” Mayor Mike Duggan and U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow both addressed the convention via pre-recorded video messages. U.S. Sen. Gary Peters spoke in person, touting Michigan's move to repeal its right-to-work law and restore a prevailing wage law; calling for passage of the PRO Act; and arguing that new auto industry jobs making electric-vehicle batteries and other components must be unionized. Unifor President Lana Payne, who represents autoworkers at the Detroit Three plants in Canada, spoke Monday about unifying with the UAW in their fight with the companies. Unifor and the UAW will be negotiating at the same time this fall. "I've already expressed to Shawn my belief that we are experiencing a special moment across the working class in North America, and that if we organize enough to seize it, we can profoundly change the future for working people in both our countries," she said. "In his response to me, Shawn said he's looking forward to be in this fight together, and I couldn't agree more." Fain doesn't see the concurrent UAW-Unifor negotiations with automakers as a challenge, but rather a source of solidarity, he said: "We have to go global. We have to show a unified approach. "I believe there’s a lot of product to go around. … I just believe we have to work together and be on the same page, so we’re not allowing ourselves to be whipsawed by the companies.” ************************************************************** Lana Payne Remarks to UAW Bargaining Convention, March 27, 2023
|
Ford reveals EV losses as it rolls Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. is set to lose $3 billion on its electric vehicle business this year — but it expects losses to reverse in the coming years as volumes of plug-in vehicles grow. In the meantime, billions of dollars in profits from internal-combustion engine and commercial vehicles are bolstering the Dearborn automaker's financial results, according to new numbers released as part of an overhaul of the way the company reports financials. Executives on Thursday will host a "teach-in" event for investors and analysts on changes to Ford's financial reporting. Instead of reporting key financial metrics by geographic region, the automaker will begin reporting results for each of its business units. The changes in how the company reports financial results reflect a broader change: the restructuring of the nearly 120-year-old automaker, initiated by CEO Jim Farley last year, into three business segments focused, respectively, on gas and hybrid vehicles, commercial customers, and EVs and software. Ford's accounting team went back and recast some financial metrics from 2021 and 2022 to align with the new segments. In 2021, the company's gas and hybrid business posted adjusted operating profits of $3.3 billion. The EV business lost $900 million. And the commercial business had adjusted operating profits of $2.7 billion, the automaker reported Thursday. Those results contributed to adjusted operating profits of $10 billion for the year, including other units such as Ford's financial services arm. Then in 2022, the legacy business grew to $6.6 billion in adjusted operating profits, while losses in the EV business grew to $2.1 billion. Adjusted operating profits for Ford's commercial vehicle business grew to $3.2. In all, the automaker reported adjusted operating profits of $10.4 billion for the year. This year, Ford expects EV losses to grow but for the other business segments to remain solidly profitable. The company is projecting $7 billion in operating profits for Ford Blue, the gas and hybrid business, up slightly from 2022. It expects earnings from Ford Pro, its commercial vehicle business, to nearly double to roughly $6 billion. Chief Financial Officer John Lawler — who has called Ford Model e "a startup within Ford" — chalked up the uptick in EV losses to the large investments Ford is making to scale up its EV business. The automaker, for example, is investing billions of dollars in developing its second- and third-generation EVs, and to build numerous EV battery plants. Executives on Thursday are expected to provide analysts and investor greater detail on how they plan to reverse losses and hit an 8% operating profit margin for the EV business by the end of 2026. "We've essentially 'refounded' Ford, with business segments that provide new degrees of strategic clarity, insight and accountability to the Ford+ plan for growth and value," Lawler said in a statement. "It's not only about changing how we report financial results; we're transforming how we think, make decisions and run the company, and allocate capital for highest returns." Ford on Thursday reiterated some of the key financial targets it has set as part of its $50 billion electrification plans. The automaker is still aiming to reach a 10% adjusted operating profit margin for the company as a whole by the end of 2026. It reaffirmed that it expects adjusted operating profits of between $9 billion and $11 billion this year. The automaker is moving to scale EV production to an annual run rate of 600,000 units by the end of this year and to 2 million units by the end of 2026 as it aims to hit its 2026 target for Ford Model e. Ford will report first-quarter financial results May 2, and then on May 22 will host a capital markets event. |
Ford recalls 1.5M vehicles to fix Associated Press Detroit — Ford is recalling more than 1.5 million vehicles in the U.S. in two actions to fix leaky brake hoses and windshield wiper arms that can break. The largest of two recalls covers nearly 1.3 million 2013 through 2018 Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ midsize cars. The company says in documents posted Friday by safety regulators that the front brake hoses can rupture and leak brake fluid. That would increase brake pedal travel and make stopping distances longer. Dealers will replace the hoses. Ford will mail owner notification letters starting April 17. They'll get a second letter once parts are available for the fix. Owners who are experiencing problems should call their dealer, Ford says. There are some parts already available for repairs. The company says only about 2% of the vehicles will have brake hose leaks. Ford says it’s aware of one crash with no mention of injuries due to the problem. The second recall covers more than 222,000 F-150 pickups from 2021. The windshield wiper arms can break. Dealers will replace the arms if needed. Owners will be notified starting March 27.
|
New Ford distribution centre set to
Heddy Sorour The new Ford distribution centre in Casselman is slated to be complete this spring, officials say. The parts warehouse was announced in September 2021 and construction began in February 2022. The $100-million facility is being developed by Bertone Development Corp. of Saint-Laurent, Que. It is expected to open in the spring of 2023. Situated south of Hwy. 417 close to the interchange with St. Albert Road and Route 700, the warehouse is expected to speed delivery time to dealers. Located in Stittsville, AYDIN CPA ProCo has been serving investors, developers and small business clients since June, 2022. “Once construction is complete, the Casselman parts distribution centre will be a 562,000-square-foot, state-of-the-art facility that will service 154 dealerships in eastern Canada and the Maritimes,” Rose Pao, communications manager with Ford Canada, told EOBJ in an email. “In fact, the operation will manage and distribute approximately 45,000 different parts received from plants across North America.” The site falls on the boundary between Casselman and La Nation. The two municipalities have been working with Ford Canada to advance the project since 2018. Construction was originally slated to be complete by late December 2022, but delays pushed the opening into the spring of 2023. “The plant is now near completion and the planned date for start of operations is around March (2023),” said Mireille Groleau, economic development and communications officer with the Municipality of Casselman. “The (Casselman) facility will house 80 employees, both hourly and salaried, and will include a gym and spacious cafeteria. The team is looking to hire approximately 40 full-time and 25 temporary part-time employees,” said Pao. The remainder of the positions will be filled by existing employees transferring from other plants. “We have met some of the workers from the Oakville plant who made the move to Casselman and are settling in,” said Groleau. The Casselman facility is one of two new warehouses the automaker is developing to replace its aging 900,000-square-foot Bramalea, Ont. location, which has been operating since 1964. The second facility, similar in size to Casselman, is being built in Paris, Ont. *********************************************************** Toronto’s Nexus Industrial REIT David Sali Toronto-based Nexus Industrial REIT has acquired Ford's new parts distribution centre in Casselman for about $117 million. Photo courtesy Nexus Industrial REIT A Toronto-based real estate firm is making its first big move into the Eastern Ontario market, acquiring a major automotive distribution centre for more than $116 million. Nexus Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust finalized an agreement earlier this month to buy a newly constructed class-A, 532,000-square-foot industrial building in Casselman from Quebec-based property developer Rosefellow for $116.8 million. Located just south of Hwy. 417 about 56 kilometres southeast of Ottawa, the facility is slated to open this spring and will serve as a parts distribution warehouse for Ford Motor Co., which has a 15-year lease on the property. The OEEDC has been supporting economic development in Eastern Ontario by putting the region on the map. “It becomes one of our trophy assets,” Nexus CEO Kelly Hanczyk told OBJ on Thursday. It’s also the first significant addition to Nexus’s portfolio in the eastern part of the province. Created in 2017 from the merger of Toronto’s Edgefront REIT and Montreal-based Nobel REIT, Nexus has an ownership stake in about 115 office, industrial and retail properties across Canada with a total footprint of more than 113 million square feet. Most of its holdings, however, are in the Greater Toronto Area, southwestern Ontario and southern and eastern Quebec. Before the Casselman deal closed, Nexus’s portfolio included just two properties in eastern Ontario and western Quebec – a 38,000-square-foot industrial building in Cornwall and a 68,000-square-foot office building on Laval Street in Gatineau. “It breaks us into the Ottawa (regional) market a little bit,” said Hanczyk. “It kind of spreads us right across the Ontario market.” Ford recently told OBJ the Casselman warehouse will store up to 45,000 automotive parts and serve 154 dealerships in Eastern Canada. The automaker has the option to order up more industrial space at the 35-acre site should it be required. “It really depends on whether they need to expand in the future,” Hanczyk said. Now that it’s established a bit of a beachhead in the region, Nexus plans to keep looking for other potential acquisition targets in and around the nation’s capital, the CEO added. While Ottawa’s industrial availability rate ticked up nearly a full percentage point in 2022, average rents continue to rise and the region remains a hotbed of e-commerce warehousing activity due to its easy access to major highways and close proximity to Toronto and Montreal. “Ottawa is a fairly major centre,” Hanczyk said. “Overall, with the warehouse distribution demand, some of the smaller markets, like Ottawa and London, are having their moment and I think they’ll continue to stay strong. It would be a good market for us to grow in, for sure.” |
It’s a New Day in the United Luis Feliz Leon, Jane Slaughter Workers walked out of the Flint Assembly Plant in the 2019 General Motors strike. In a runoff election, UAW members have elected a full slate of reformers to lead the unioninto this year's Big 3 auto bargaining and beyond. Photo: Jake May/TheFlint Journal via AP. The machine will churn no more. Nearly 80 years of top-down one-party rule in the United Auto Workers are coming to an end. Reformer Shawn Fain is set to be the winner in the runoff for the UAW presidency. As of Thursday night, Fain had a 505-vote edge, 69,386 to 68,881, over incumbent Ray Curry of the Administration Caucus. Curry was appointed by the union’s executive board in 2021. There are around 600 unresolved challenged ballots. (This story will be updated with the final vote tally when we have it.) “By now, the writing is on the wall: change is coming to the UAW,” said Fain. “You, the members, have already made history in this election, and we’re just getting started. It’s a new day in the UAW.” It’s a stunning upset in one of the nation’s most storied unions. Once Fain’s victory is conclusive— after remaining challenged ballots are counted—he will join Secretary-Treasurer Margaret Mock, who ran on the Members United slate and won outright in the first round, and a majority of the International Executive Board, giving reformers control of the direction of the union. The UAW Members United slate won every race it challenged—a clear rebuke to the old guard. “Thousands of UAW members put countless hours into this historic campaign to take back our union,” said Fain. “I thank those members—no matter who they voted for—for taking an active role in our union. “But thousands of members have lost faith, after years of corruption at the top and concessions at the bottom,” he continued. “Our job now is to put the members back in the driver’s seat, regain the trust of the rank and file, and put the companies on notice. We are ending give-back unionism and company control in the UAW.” Fain is an electrician from Kokomo, Indiana, and on the staff of the international union. “Shawn Fain ran a campaign on the promise of true reform in the UAW,” said Justin Mayhugh, a General Motors worker at the Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City and a member of Unite All Workers for Democracy, the caucus formed in 2019 to fight for members’ right to vote on top officers. UAWD backed Fain’s UAW Members United slate. “That message has resonated with the members of our union who are ready for change,” Mayhugh said. “He ran a campaign based on the needs of the rank and file, and because of that, he was able to overcome the many entrenched advantages Curry enjoyed during this election process. It’s a truly historic moment for our union.” And not a moment too soon. The Big 3 auto contracts with Ford, GM, and Stellantis (formerly Chrysler) expire in six months, and the industry is undergoing major changes with the rise of electric vehicles. The Big 3 now have less than half of the domestic auto market and more than half of all U.S. auto workers are non-union. Agreements with the Canadian union Unifor covering some 20,000 auto workers at the Big 3 also expire in September. “We are putting the Big 3 on notice: they should get ready to negotiate with a UAW where the membership is back in charge of this union,” Fain told Labor Notes in December after the first round of the election, where reformers won five seats outright. LONG TIME COMING The last time a reformer had won a seat on the UAW board was in 1986, when Jerry Tucker of the New Directions Movement became a regional director. New Directions coalesced a group of reformers into a rank-and-file resistance movement in the 1980s and early 1990s. And going back even further, the last contested election for the presidency, except for Tucker’s run for president in 1991 and other symbolic runs, was in 1946 between RJ Thomas and Walter Reuther, heading opposing caucuses. Reuther won and purged the Communists from the UAW staff and defeated or co-opted other opponents. He consolidated his power in a 1947 sweep that accomplished what historian Nelson Lichtenstein describes as “nothing less than the elimination of his rivals from all posts in the UAW hierarchy.” “The UAW in the ’40s was known for this intense internal democracy,” said Lichtenstein, author of *Walter Reuther: The Most Dangerous Man in Detroit*. “And hopefully, with the victory of Shawn Fain, he’s not going to create a new machine. There are going to be contested elections from now on, and that’s a good, healthy thing. It brings in the rank and file and energizes people.” BUMPS AHEAD The UAW has 400,000 members and a strike fund of a billion dollars. The new leaders campaigned on a militant approach to organizing, internal democracy, and solidarity against tiers, similar to the leadership shakeup in the Teamsters in 2021. The Members United slogan was “No Corruption, No Concessions, No Tiers.” They face steep challenges. The union has seen a membership decline in its core manufacturing sector. The GM division, for example, is today about 11 percent of its 450,000-member heyday in the 1970s. Attempts to organize auto factories in the South have failed, including at a Nissan plant in Mississippi in 2017 and a Volkswagen plant in Tennessee in 2019. Other organizing opportunities are on the horizon. Ford will build four new factories to produce electric vehicle batteries and electric F-Series pickup trucks in Kentucky and Tennessee by 2025, employing 11,000 workers. To shore up numbers, the union has brought in university workers in recent years, now accounting for 20 percent of members. University of California graduate employees, coming off a recent strike, went overwhelmingly for Fain, defying local leaders who supported Curry. Graduate worker turnout was very low, however, and they were a modest part of Fain’s vote total, 2.5 percent. GOOD CONTRACTS ORGANIZE The new leaders will need to fight for stronger contracts at existing shops while launching new organizing campaigns. Scott Houldieson, an electrician at Ford’s Chicago Assembly Plant and a founding member of UAWD, says these goals are mutually dependent. “When you’re negotiating concessionary contracts, it doesn’t help your organizing strategy at all,” said Houldieson. “In fact, it gives talking points to the anti-union forces. “And while we have to do both at the same time—bargain strong contracts and do new organizing—we will do better at organizing the unorganized if we can first organize to fight back,” he continued. “The rank and file is fed up with our union officers taking the company line, each and every time we have an issue, whether it be contract negotiations or grievance settlements.” The Big 3 are hauling in record profits, but they continue to lose market share to non-union automakers. Electric vehicle battery plants and federal investments that are part of a green industrial policy provide an opportunity to organize workers in new manufacturing jobs. CONCESSIONS KEY BEEF UAWD’s campaign for one-member-one-vote was seen as a long shot when it began in 2019. Even the union’s Internal Review Board once described the union as functioning like a “one-party state.” But then an investigation by the Justice Department laid bare longstanding corruption in the union, including embezzlement, kickbacks, and collusion with employers. Thirteen union officials went to jail, including two former presidents. The consent decree that resulted from the corruption scandals made it possible for members to decide whether they wanted to directly elect their officers, as opposed to a convention delegate system. In December 2021, UAW members voted 63.6 percent in support of electing top officers through one-member-one-vote. But the financial chicanery at the top was not enough to galvanize the rank and file, says retired Local 1700 President Bill Parker. “Corruption was a minor issue,” said Parker. “The real problem was that the union no longer fought the company, going back to the early ’80s when it began granting concessions, and then it all went downhill from there.” The union began giving away concessions at Chrysler beginning in 1979. Ford and GM followed suit with demands for ever-deeper givebacks. “People want the union to challenge management,” said Parker, “not lay down in front of them. So they want the collective power of the union, not just to reform the union, but to aggressively change the union into a fighting institution.” RETIREES VOTE FOR CHANGE But the discontent has had a slow build-up. Take retirees from locals whose factories closed. Parker says they felt abandoned by the union and were favorable to reformers in both rounds of the election. (We can’t tell how most retirees voted because their votes are mixed with those of active members. But we can see how retirees from closed locals voted.) “Forty or 50 years ago, when I started out, retirees were solidly in the camp of the Administration Caucus,” he said, “because at the time, the Administration was doing things like negotiating improvements in the pension and bonuses. “Then in 2007, during contract negotiations, the union agreed to two tiers.” Now “the majority of Chrysler workers are second-tier employees with no pension, no retiree health care, and they’re treated poorly in the plant.” At Chrysler Local 1268, where the company has indefinitely “idled” the Belvidere Assembly Plant where 1,350 UAW members work, workers voted over 70 percent for Fain. “The sad reality of this is, over the last year and a half, since President Curry’s been in power… the company has awarded more than three different products, and Belvidere could have had every one of those,” Fain said on a Facebook livestream last December. “They’ve had ample opportunity to take on the company and to get product there, and prevent thousands of layoffs.” BUILDING HOPE Anger has propelled rank and filers into leadership. But the flip side of anger is lack of hope. “The new administration is going to have to start giving the members some confidence,” said Houldieson. “Right now, they lack confidence, and for good reason—they’ve been beaten down by corporate unionism for decades now. So we’re going to have to work on building a contract campaign that gives the membership more confidence than they’ve had in a long time.” This attitude of resignation partly explains the low turnout in the election (14 percent of the 400,000 active members and 600,000 retirees) and the slim margin of victory. In addition, reformers said that members struggled to get information about the candidates in order to make an informed decision. At first, the AC had relied on the sleepy internal life of the union to protect it from the insurgents and tried to pretend the election wasn’t happening, giving it little publicity. “The Administration Caucus didn’t campaign much in the first round because they thought they had it in the bag,” said Houldieson. “They are used to just having their way.” But they hadn’t faced a one-member-one-vote election before. After the reformers’ victories in December, the AC roused from its lethargy and Curry pulled out all the stops. His strategy was to get Administration Caucus loyalists—appointed and elected officials—to campaign in Ford locals, the home base of his running mate Chuck Browning, who has been the UAW vice president in charge of Ford. Their message was that Fain, from Stellantis, would somehow discriminate against Ford workers. Curry, who was an assembler at Freightliner Trucks in North Carolina before he became a union official, won in Region 1A to the west of Detroit and also won in large Ford plants in Region 8 in the South, where turnout increased by 41 percent in the runoff. Fain took a majority in the union’s other seven regions. REBELLION FROM BELOW Plucked from the shop floor, UAW Members United challenger Daniel Vicente won the runoff vote for director of Region 9, which covers western and central New York, New Jersey, and most of Pennsylvania. What motivated him to seek union office? Vicente, a machine operator and a convention delegate representing Local 644 in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, credited a hazardous incident at his current job at Dometic, which makes steering control cables for boats, and the short shrift a local union official paid him once he brought the incident to his attention. His nerve was steeled at the July UAW convention in Detroit when he saw delegates, in the convention’s closing hours, reverse their previous vote to boost strike pay—at the AC’s request. In a heartfelt Facebook post on March 3, Vicente wrote about growing up in a blue-collar family and the bonds of solidarity he has forged with fellow workers on the shop floor, writing about a co-worker, Mohamed Aitqol: “You and I have pulled 12 hours shifts together, we sweated it out in the summers and froze half to death in the winters on these machines.” He promised to carry with him that spirit of solidarity as he travels Region 9 to meet with local members and leaders to together transform the union. “The race is done, so now the hard part begins,” he said.
|
Ontario income tax credits Alex Arsenych, While the deadline to file your taxes getting closer, there are some personal tax credits people in Ontario may qualify for. “Today is the best time to start putting all your papers together, and that way, you’ll be sure you don’t forget anything,” H&R Block tax specialist, Yannick Lemay, told CTV News Toronto. “Often what we see in practice is that the credits that get forgotten are those that people need to search for slips, they need to search for receipts.” Lemay brought up Ontario’s Staycation Tax Credit as an example. Through this credit, Ontarians who have stayed in a hotel or rented a cottage in the province can claim 20 per cent of eligible accommodation expenses between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2022. “We are excluding costs for food, entertainment, gas, and all extra expenses, but anything that goes for accommodation for travel, you can claim,” he said, noting Ontarians who want to apply for this credit should have all of their receipts. “It’s up to $1,000 [for an individual], and it’s a 20 per cent rate credit, so that means Ontarians can get up to $200 back.” Families and couples can claim up to $2,000 and get a maximum credit of $400. “Now is the time to get those receipts,” Lemay said. “But there are other credits that have changed, improved, or are new credits, for which you don’t necessarily have to provide an additional receipt.” Lemay pointed to the Ontario Seniors Care at Home Tax Credit, which can help low to moderate-income seniors with eligible medical expenses. Seniors who are 70 years and older can write off up to 25 per cent of their medical expenses, and can claim up to $6,000 for a maximum of $1,500 in return. The credit is refundable and anyone earning up to $65,000 annually can qualify, though the amount of credit is on a sliding scale based on income level. There is also the Childcare Access and Relief from Expenses (CARE) tax credit, which helps families with a household income of $150,000 or less. Eligible families may be able to claim up to 75 per cent of child care expenses, including child care centres and camps. While there are personal income tax credits, Lemay says there are also deductions that Ontarians will want to keep in mind. Anyone who has moved to be closer to work or school might be able to claim their moving expenses, he said. “Sometimes people think they don’t move far enough to be able to deduct moving expenses, but the criteria is 40 kilometres,” Lemay said. According to the federal government, if your new home is at least 40 kilometres closer to your new job than your previous home was, you can be eligible for the moving expenses deduction. Lemay also noted those who have investments outside of their registered accounts – like their Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA) or Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) – can deduct management fees. “If you’re paying management fees to your financial institution to manage your money – your investments – those fees are deductible, and they don’t come with a tax slip,” Lemay said. “Sometimes you have to look at the bank statement to find the fees.” May 1 is the deadline for most Canadians to file their tax returns, with June 15 being the deadline for those who are self-employed. |
Retiree Joe Vugts
This is to inform you of the passing of Retiree Our Sincerest Condolences go out to his Family and Friends. He will be sadly missed. Funeral will be held at McCallum Funeral Home Visitation Funeral Service
|
Ford to lay off 1,100 at Spanish Associated Press Madrid — Ford Motor Co. said Friday that it will cut around 1,100 jobs at its plant in the eastern Spanish city of Valencia. The cuts are in addition to the 2,300 layoffs largely in Germany and the U.K. that the automaker announced last month as part of a “leaner, more competitive cost structure in Europe.” Ford Spain said in a statement that it notified unions on Friday of what it said was “a profound restructuring of its operations,” which comes even as Ford champions the Valencia plant as its preferred site to assemble “next-generation” electric vehicles on the continent. The plant is Ford’s only such facility in Spain and employed 5,400 people. Ford has said its strategy to offer an all-electric fleet in Europe by 2035 has not changed and that production of its first European-built electric car is due to start later this year. The cuts were “mainly due to the already announced discontinuing production of the S-Max and Galaxy models in April 2023,” Ford Spain said in an email. In January, the Dearborn-based company announced a new solar power plant had opened at the Valencia facility as it looks to become a carbon-neutral business. The job cuts come amid a sea change in the global auto industry from gas-guzzling combustion engines to electric vehicles. Governments are pushing to reduce the emissions that contribute to climate change, and a resulting race to develop electric vehicles has generated intense competition among automakers. Other automakers are reducing headcount to cut costs. General Motors Co. said Thursday it is offering voluntary buyouts to most of its 58,000 salaried employees in the United States. |
153,000 catalytic converters March 16, 2023 Valuable materials make the emissions control devices a top target The catalytic converter theft crime wave that's been sweeping America may be even worse than it seems. A new report from CarFax estimates that 153,000 of the emissions control devices were stolen in 2022, based on repair records. That's higher than some previous estimates and the situation doesn't appear to be improving. According to the National Insurance Crime Bureau, the number of thefts increased 1,215% from 2019 through 2022. Thieves are going after catalytic converters because of the valuable materials used in their construction, including platinum, palladium and rhodium. They're also relatively easy to steal, the process taking little more than a minute in some cases. But it's not without risk. One thief in Georgia was recently killed when the vehicle he was working on fell and crush him. Another in California was run over by a woman who was sleeping in the lifted Ford Excursion SUV he was under and drove off when she was awoken by the noise he was making. As part of its review, CarFax identified which vehicles are hit the most often and these are the top 10: 1. Ford F-Series 2. Honda Accord 3. Toyota Prius 4. Honda CR-V 5. Ford Explorer 6. Ford Econoline 7. Chevrolet Equinox 8. Chevrolet Silverado 9. Toyota Tacoma 10. Chevrolet Cruze As with all automotive theft prevention, experts advise owners to park in well-lit areas or in garages when possible. There are also catalytic converter anti-theft devices available on the aftermarket, and Toyota is now offering them as optional accessories on several models, including the Prius, Rav4 and Tacoma. |
Ford recalls 18 F-150 Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. said Friday that it is recalling 18 F-150 Lightning pickup trucks due to a battery cell manufacturing defect. The recall follows a five-week production shutdown at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn where the electric truck is made. The automaker said Friday that production is slated to resume Monday as previously planned. The company said in a statement that the manufacturing defect at supplier SK On's plant in Georgia occurred over a four-week span starting at the end of last year. Initially, the automaker said it believed the defect was not present in any Lightning units that had been delivered to customers or dealers, but it now has identified 18 such units that are affected. Ford has said that the issue initially came to light Feb. 4, when a vehicle displayed a battery issue during a pre-delivery quality check and then caught fire while it was parked in a holding lot near the plant. The fire spread to two other Lightning units. That incident prompted the five-week production shutdown and a halt on shipments while Ford and SK On investigated the underlying issue. The two companies later said the root cause had been identified in SK On's battery cell production process, and that a fix had been implemented. "Working with Ford, SK On identified the root cause of the issue and implemented measures of improvement in our processes to address the issue," SK On said in a previous statement. "SK On believes this was a rare occurrence, not a fundamental issue with the technology of the battery cells or the overall manufacturing systems." Asked Friday about the nature of the defect, Ford said the recalled units' high-voltage batteries can experience a short that could result in a vehicle fire when they are at a high state of charge. The electric truck is a key part of Ford's $50 billion electrification strategy, under which it aims to hit an annual EV production rate of 2 million units globally by 2026. The Lightning is a battery-electric version of America's most popular vehicle, as well as the first mass-market EV pickup to enter the U.S. market. Ford is working to ramp up production of the Lightning to a run rate of 150,000 units annually by the end of this year as it tries to catch up with high demand for the truck, which garnered some 200,000 reservations. Since launching last spring and through the end of February, Ford has delivered about 19,200 Lightning units. Ford said it will notify customers with units covered by the recall "as soon as possible" to make arrangements with a dealer to have the battery pack replaced. While their vehicle is being repaired, Ford will supply affected customers with a loaner vehicle. Customers can continue to drive and charge their Lightnings, but Ford said it "encourage(s) them to make an appointment for this repair at their earliest convenience." The automaker said it is not aware of any accidents or injuries related to the recall. "Together with SK On, we have confirmed the root causes and have implemented quality actions," spokesperson Emma Bergg said in a statement. "Production is on track to resume Monday with clean stock of battery packs."
|
Volkswagen to build battery Monica Raymunt Volkswagen AG has chosen Canada to build its first battery plant outside Europe in a bid to fast-track an expansion in the key U.S. market. The site, in St. Thomas, Ontario, is slated to start production in 2027, Europe's biggest carmaker said Monday. The decision to locate the facility in Canada, amid rich incentives offered in the U.S. as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, will help VW get access to key raw materials and clean energy, according to the company. "We now have the unique opportunity to grow profitably in North America and play a key role in driving the transition to electric mobility," VW Chief Financial Officer Arno Antlitz said in a statement. "Volkswagen has the right strategy, products and scale to take a strong position in the North American market." VW is seeking to turn the page from being an also-ran in the United States with an enlarged footprint and a slew of new models, and lessen its dependence on China, where it sells just under 40% of its vehicles. Earlier this month, VW-backed Scout Motors said it'll build a new $2 billion plant making Scout-branded SUVs in South Carolina. VW is part of a wave of European companies looking to cash in on President Joe Biden's climate law, which stipulates that 50% of the battery components of an EV must be made in North America to qualify for EV tax credits of as much as $7,500. The carmaker in August signed an accord with Canada to cooperate on the supply chain for batteries with a focus on material such as lithium, nickel and cobalt. Earlier this month, Antlitz said the U.S. policy, comprising some $369 billion in incentives, was a tailwind to the company's plans. The St. Thomas plant marks VW's third wholly owned battery plant, in addition to sites in Germany and Spain. The move follows warnings that battery-cell plants would become unfeasible in Germany and Europe if the region didn't bring energy prices under control. VW also has a range of partners, including Sweden's Northvolt. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government is under intense pressure to match the enormous U.S. subsidies. Climate think tank Clean Prosperity recently estimated the U.S. production tax credits on a battery plant create a gap of C$1.89 billion ($1.4 billion) each year, compared to current Canadian grants. Trudeau's government has promised to level the playing field with the United States, but a detailed plan is not expected until later this month when the federal budget is published. Government officials wouldn't disclose how much money Canada is putting on the table for the VW plant. But Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne called it "a home run" for the northern nation. "It is the largest single investment in the history of the automotive industry in Canada," he said, adding there is "an understanding that Canada is the place to be for the critical minerals supply chain." VW's multibillion battery factory is the latest project confirmation in the EV battery supply chain in Canada. Stellantis NV and LG Energy Solution announced a joint venture in March 2022 to establish a $4 billion battery plant in Windsor. General Motors Co. and Posco Chemical are setting up a cathode factory in Becancour, Quebec. Ford Motor Co. is also in talks with Korean firms to build a battery component plant in the region, Bloomberg has reported. |
Ottawa warns provinces not By Saba Aziz The federal health minister is warning provinces not to charge Canadians fees for “medically necessary” care, including telemedicine and some private services, in a new letter released Friday. “There has been evidence of residents paying out of pocket to access diagnostic services such as ultrasounds, MRI and CT scans — services that should be accessible at no cost,” said Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos in a statement. “This is not acceptable and will not be tolerated.” He also noted in the letter that he is “very concerned” about increasing reports of patients being charged for “medically necessary” services and that whether these are delivered virtually or in person, they must be available free of charge. Duclos says he plans to clarify the expectation in an interpretation letter attached to the Canada Health Act, which lays out the standards of care Canadians must be able to receive under the public health care system, no matter where they live. He will also be deducting a total of $82 million in Canada Health Transfers from the provinces over “patient charges levied during 2020-2021, for medically necessary services that should be accessible to patients at no cost.” Trudeau says provinces accountable for own health-care spending following federal deal This includes over $76 million in deductions under the Diagnostic Services Policy, which says that patients should not be charged for medically necessary diagnostic services, such as MRI and CT scans. Another $6 million will also be deducted for other insured services at private surgical clinics and for access to abortion. Duclos said the federal government was clamping down on out-of-pocket expenses for private care “with a focus on virtual care and other medically necessary services that Canadians are being asked to pay for.” Duclos sent letters to all provinces and territories, expressing concerns about a recent increase in reports of patient charges for medically necessary services. “The goal of the Canada Health Act (CHA) has never been to levy penalties, but rather to ensure patients are not charged for the insured services they have already paid for through their taxes,” he said in a statement. “If a province or territory permits patient charges for medically necessary health services, a mandatory deduction must be taken from the jurisdiction’s CHT payments.” |
GM offers U.S. employees Kalea Hall To achieve $2 billion in cost savings, General Motors Co. is offering a voluntary separation program to its employees, the automaker confirmed Thursday. The majority of the U.S. salaried workforce is eligible for the program. GM employs about 58,000. Eligible employees must sign up by March 24. “As part of our plan to accelerate attrition and achieve $2 billion in cost savings by the end of 2024, General Motors is announcing a Voluntary Separation Program for all U.S. salaried employees with at least five years of service and all global executives with at least two years of service," spokesperson David Barnas said in a statement. "This voluntary program offers eligible employees an opportunity to make a career change or retire earlier. We are offering three packages based on level and service to the company. Employees are strongly encouraged to consider the program. By permanently bringing down structured costs, we can improve vehicle profitability and remain nimble in an increasingly competitive market.” Also as part of the cost-cutting measures, in late February the Detroit automaker said it was cutting about 500 executive-level and salaried jobs. The news came a month after CEO Mary Barra said General Motors Co. was "not planning layoffs." “I do want to be clear that we're not planning layoffs,” Barra said in late January. “We are limiting our hiring to only the most strategically important roles, and we'll use attrition to help manage overall headcount.” To achieve the $2 billion in cost savings, GM CFO Paul Jacobson said the company would focus on reducing "complexity in all of our products and reducing corporate overhead expenses across the board. I do want to be clear, though, we’re not planning layoffs. We are limiting our hiring to only the most strategically important roles and will use attrition to help manage overall headcount.” For 2023, GM anticipates adjusted earnings to be in the range of $10.5 billion to $12.5 billion for the year. Last year, the company booked record pre-tax earnings of $14.5 billion. |
New Ford patent proposes a By Gary Gastelu The Ford Mustang Mach-E may soon be even more like a Mustang. Ford has filed a patent application for technology that can help its electric cars to do smoky tire burnouts. The conventional Ford Mustang is offered with a feature called "line lock" that applies just the front brakes, which allows the rear tires to spin while the car stays in place. This can usually be achieved with a powerful rear-wheel-drive car by lightly holding the brake pedal while the rear wheels overcome their brakes, but the system makes it easier to do, both for fun and to warm the tires for better grip before making a run at the drag strip. The proposed system would disable the front motor and power the rear while the front brakes are applied. The proposed system would disable the front motor and power the rear while the front brakes are applied. (Ford) However, high performance electric vehicles like the Mustang Mach-E GT are typically all-wheel-drive and cannot do this, but Ford has developed a way that they can. Unlike an all-wheel-drive internal combustion engine car, which sends power from a single motor through a drivetrain, most all-wheel-drive electric cars have at least two electric motors, one for each axle, while some employ three or four. The system could also operate in the opposite way, allowing for a front tire burnout. Ford's patent, titled "Electrified Vehicle Performance Mode With Intentional Wheel Spin for Tire Heating," features drawings of a Mustang Mach-E and describes programming that would create a line lock effect by disabling the front motor and applying the brakes on that end while turning off the traction control at the rear. It can also do it the other way around, allowing the front tires to spin instead. This could give the Mustang Mach-E an advantage in a drag race against other all-wheel-drive cars that cannot warm their tires, but would also put on quite a show in a parking lot. Ford has not confirmed this feature is coming and as with many patents, there is no guarantee that it will ever be offered, but the company has a history of doing things like this just for fun. The Mustang's line lock feature allows for standing burnouts. Along with the previous line lock, the new 2024 Mustang is getting an Electronic Drift Brake that is a handbrake only used to lock the rear tires for drifting and powersliding on a track. The handle and brakes release as soon as you let it go. The all-wheel-drive Ford Focus RS hot hatchback sold from 2016 to 2018 also had a Drift Mode that sent more power to the rear wheels and loosened up the stability control and offered an optional Drift Stick similar to the Mustang's Electronic Drift Brake. |
A New Ford Mustang Shelby
BYIAN SOMERS The top-tier Mustang is now absent from Ford's lineup but if the car does make its return, hycade's new concept shows a lot of potential. Ford stopped producing the Shelby Mustang GT500 recently in order to focus their attention on upgrading the new seventh-generation S650 model of the iconic pony car. A recent report suggests that the new GT500 could appear in 2025 and there’s been much debate over what’s in store for the latest iteration of the Mustang's top-dog model. Digital artist Hycade has given us one possible GT500 design in the latest video on his YouTube channel and it shows a lot of promise. Let's see what this new Shelby GT500 concept render is all about. Over the last two years, the automotive artist Hycade has been producing some stunning digital renders on social media. Hycade’s renders offer the viewer a total 360 of his vision of these fantasy cars. In their latest video, Hycade has given us an idea of how the “2024 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500” might look, and it’s simply stunning. The most notable aspect of this render is the angular form of the body based on the S650 Mustang. There are no racing stripes in sight here, as Hycade has opted for a distraction-free all-black vehicle.
These sharp angles give the car a futuristic appearance and it’s almost reminiscent of a Lamborghini Aventador SVJ from certain angles. There is a new body kit that is low to the ground, and above that, there is an enormous hood scoop. This GT500 is much wider than its predecessor, which is most notable in the massive fenders and added side vents. On the back, there’s an oversized wing spoiler similar to the C7 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1. So far, it’s unclear what type of engine and power the next GT500 will have. But perhaps Shelby will aim to match the Hennessey Venom 1200 Mustang’s power which is over 1,200 hp. Since we know the 2024 Ford Mustang models have a bump in horsepower over the S550 generation, a new Shelby GT500 will likely follow suit. The Shelby Mustang is quite possibly the most iconic of muscle cars. It’s been with us in various forms since the ‘60s but for many, the third-generation Shelby GT500 is the pinnacle of this high-performance variant of the Mustang. The latest GT500 came packed with a supercharged Ford 5.2-liter V8 Predator engine that offered 760 hp and 625 lb-ft of torque as stock, and an array of modifications to cement it as one of the premium muscle cars of the modern era.
|
Doug Ford’s campaign finance The Ontario Court of Appeal has struck down Premier Doug Ford’s controversial campaign finance law that limits spending by unions and other third parties. By Robert Benzie The Ontario Court of Appeal has struck down Premier Doug Ford’s controversial campaign finance law that limits spending by unions and other third parties. In a significant legal victory Monday for labour unions and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the court has given Ford’s government “12 months to allow Ontario to fashion Charter-compliant legislation.” But Attorney General Doug Downey’s office said the Progressive Conservatives “are disappointed with the outcome and will be appealing the decision” to the Supreme Court of Canada. The successful legal challenge was mounted by the Working Families coalition of unions, the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, and the Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association, among others. They argued their members’ rights were unfairly hindered by the law preventing third-party political action committees from spending more than $600,000 on advertising and other activities in the 12 months before an election. “The challenged spending restrictions infringe the informational component of the voter’s (Charter) right to meaningful participation in the electoral process, as set out by the Supreme Court,” the court ruled. In 2021, Ford invoked the Charter of Rights’ “notwithstanding” clause to overturn a judge’s ruling that his legislation limiting election spending by third-party groups was unconstitutional. The premier was in a rush, because the June 2022 election was looming and the Tories’ feared an onslaught of anti-Ford advertising before the writ period. While the court of appeal found “the notwithstanding clause was properly invoked,” it concluded the Tories still infringed upon Charter rights. Speaking for the government, Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy conceded “it never feels good to lose.” Cara Zwibel, director of fundamental freedoms for the civil liberties association, said it was “encouraging that the court has found the overly broad third-party spending limits unconstitutional.” “But (it is) concerning that the lower court’s error (in finding no violation of the right to vote) had potential to impact the last election,” said Zwibel. “The Ontario government tried to insulate its unconstitutional legislation by invoking the notwithstanding clause. The court of appeal’s finding that the right to vote was unreasonably infringed, making the notwithstanding clause irrelevant to the analysis, is therefore a very important victory,” she said. NDP Leader Marit Stiles — whose party, like the Liberals and the Greens, had opposed Ford’s restrictions — said “it’s just yet another example of how wrong this government is getting it when they trample on the democratic rights of Ontarians. “We will continue … to stand up against them and for the democratic rights of all Ontarians,” said Stiles. Liberal MPP Stephen Blais (Orléans) noted it was yet another legal setback for the Tories and urged them to cut their losses instead of appeal to the Supreme Court. “The premier likes to position himself as a fighter — someone who’s going to fight for Ontarians. When I look at a fighter, I want someone who’s going to win one every once in a while,” said Blais. “This government has a track record of going into the big fight and losing,” he said. “When you’re spending millions of taxpayers’ dollars trying to change critical pieces of legislation — trying to use the notwithstanding clause to subvert people’s rights — I think Ontarians would prefer that that money be invested into health care and education.” |
Ford sales up 22% in February Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales rose 22% year-over-year in February, bolstered by a healthier flow of new-vehicle inventory. The Dearborn automaker sold 157,606 vehicles last month, up from 129,273 in February 2022. Through the first two months of the year, sales are up 11.4%. “We’re really off to a fast start," said Erich Merkle, head of U.S. sales analysis at Ford, noting growth across trucks, Ford-brand SUVs and electric vehicles. The majority of Ford's February sales — nearly 145,000 units — came from internal combustion engine vehicles, but the automaker's sales of battery-electric vehicles were up 68% from a year ago to 3,523. Ford is investing $50 billion in electrification through 2026, and has three battery-electric vehicles on the market: the Mustang Mach-E, the F-150 Lightning and the E-Transit cargo van. Hybrid vehicle sales were up 33% while combustion engine vehicle sales climbed 20.5% from a year ago. Better inventory flow supported the strong sales month. Ford reported having roughly 345,000 units in gross stock to end the month. “We had some inventory issues in the second half of last year, in terms of not having enough to fill our orders," said Merkle. "And now as we start this year off, we’re in a better position and we’re able to sell at a much better rate.” In reporting fourth-quarter and full-year 2022 financial results last month, Ford executives said that nagging supply-chain issues had held back production volumes and contributed to the year's earnings miss and net loss. The February sales results may be a signal that some of those supply-chain problems are easing, and Merkle said the automaker expects to see a return to a more typical spring selling season this year. Ford's February results outpaced the industry. American Honda's sales were down 1.4% year-over-year, while Toyota Motor North America's slipped 2.4%. Other automakers that report sales on a monthly basis had strong months, including a more than 16% gain by Hyundai Motor Group, which includes the Hyundai and Kia brands. Overall, light-vehicle sales in the U.S. grew by 9.5% year-over-year in February to 1.14 million units, LMC Automotive estimated based on preliminary data. The firm noted that February 2022 was an especially challenging time for the market, and last month's results were below those in February 2021. Still, analysts said the showing was encouraging. “February was one of the more upbeat months for the U.S. auto market in recent times, although this should be taken in the context of the lower volumes we have seen since the onset of the chip shortage and other supply-side issues," David Oakley, manager of Americas sales forecasts for LMC, said in a statement. "One encouraging sign from February’s results was that the recovery appeared to become more broad-based, with brands that had been extremely subdued showing some evidence of returning to more normal levels, as inventory climbs," he added. Results across Ford's nameplates were mixed. Sales of the Bronco Sport, Escape, Mustang Mach-E, Edge, Ranger and Transit Connect were down in February. The automaker attributed the dip in Mach-E sales to the all-electric vehicle's plant in Mexico being down for seven weeks to prepare it to boost production capacity. But sales were up for some of Ford's most popular models, including the full-size Bronco SUV, which saw sales rise 112% over last February. Sales of the Explorer and Expedition SUVs also were up more than 100%, and F-Series was up 21.5%. Ford reported selling 1,336 units of the electric F-150 Lightning last month. Also Thursday, the company said it would restart Lightning production March 13 after several weeks of downtime while it sorted out a battery issue. The Maverick compact pickup posted an 89% year-over-year sales increase in February. Sales of Ford's luxury Lincoln brand were up 4%. Ford said the strong results helped it grow its market share for the month by 1.4 percentage points over last year, bringing its total to 13.3%. |
Postal Service taps Ford to Riley Beggin Washington — The United States Postal Service awarded a competitive contract Tuesday to Ford Motor Co. for 9,250 battery-electric vehicles. USPS plans to spend around $9.6 billion on vehicles, the agency said, but it's unclear immediately how much the contract with Ford will be and USPS did not immediately respond to a request for more information. The Ford E-Transit vehicles will be produced in Kansas City, Missouri, and will begin being delivered in December. The agency also plans to buy 9,250 gas-powered vehicles from Stellantis NV alongside the EVs "to fill the urgent need for vehicles," according to a USPS press release. Three quarters of the agency's acquisitions over the next five years will be EVs, and 100% of acquisitions after 2026 will be EVs. Altogether, the Ford and Stellantis purchases will total $1 billion. USPS also awarded competitive contracts to three suppliers for more than 14,000 EV charging stations that will recharge delivery vehicles at postal facilities. "We are moving forward with our plans to simultaneously improve our service, reduce our cost, grow our revenue, and improve the working environment for our employees," Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in a statement. :Electrification of our vehicle fleet is now an important component of these initiatives." The agency has not yet determined where the new vehicles will be deployed, and says chargers will go to at least 75 locations within the next year. The Inflation Reduction Act appropriated additional funding for USPS to buy electric vehicles. The agency estimates the funding will help them get 66,230 electric delivery vehicles as part of an overall purchase of 106,000 new delivery trucks. USPS' path to electrification has been politically fraught — the agency first announced in 2021 it would make only 10% of its new fleet electric. Biden administration officials and Democrats in Congress pushed back, and several Democrat-led states sued to stop the plan. USPS slowly ramped up the percentage of the fleet it promised it would make electric before settling on the 62% it plans on today. |
F-150 Lightning connected to Amazon rainforest pollution The Detroit News Materials on Ford Motor Co.’s F-150 Lightning electric pickup are damaging the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, according to a Bloomberg investigation. The news agency reported Monday that aluminum used in the truck’s frames is connected to rust-colored bauxite that comes from a mine “that has long faced allegations of pollution and land appropriation” and an ore refinery that’s accused of making people sick. A class-action lawsuit has been filed with 11,000 residents of neighborhoods near the Hydro Alunorte refinery that names owner Norsk Hydro ASA of Norway as the one responsible for polluting rivers and streams, according to Bloomberg. The suit says there’s toxic mud with elevated levels of aluminum and other heavy metals, and Alunorte’s actions have caused health problems including cancer and birth defects. Ford’s electric F-150, made at the Rouge complex in Dearborn. uses aluminum to make it lighter. Ford switched to aluminum from steel for the exterior of the combustion-engine F-150 in 2015. Much of the aluminum on the truck, in addition to what Hydro provides, can also be traced to the Amazon, Bloomberg found. Researchers studying the communities around the Alunorte refinery in Barcarena have found that rivers and streams are polluted with toxic metals, the news agency reported, with some levels 57 times greater than what’s considered safe. Bloomberg also reviewed the results of some residents’ medical tests, finding one woman with 175 times the limit for aluminum in her hair and 81 times higher in her blood. In 2018, Oslo-based Hydro was fined 20 million reais ($6.1 million at the time) by Brazilian authorities and had to temporarily halt production after a discharge of untreated water during a flood. It later agreed to pay an additional 160 million reais. The company denies any wrongdoing or culpability for the incident, Bloomberg reported. The London-based law firm Pogust Goodhead filed the class-action suit against Hydro in the Netherlands. The firm wants to hold Hydro liable for 10 incidents resulting in pollution. Hydro has denied the allegations and has until March 8 to file a response. “Ford is committed to a supply chain that exceeds minimum regulatory compliance requirements and respects human rights, including the right to clean air and clean water," Ford spokesperson Artealia Gilliard said in a statement. "That commitment applies to everything we make and that others make for us. We encourage people to call attention to issues, investigate all of them, and work with suppliers to align their business practices with our standards.” The Mineração Rio do Norte bauxite mine, known as MRN, is in a national forest along a tributary to the Amazon. MRN mines more than 12 million metric tons of bauxite a year from the rainforest. Ships bring almost half of MRN’s output to Alunorte. MRN, owned by a consortium of mining companies, wants to expand its footprint by about one-third. Regulators have twice rejected environmental studies “for insufficiently consulting neighboring communities,” according to Bloomberg. The studies were accepted in October, and a decision is expected this year. The mine partially overlaps land meant for descendants of slaves who are entitled to legal protections, Bloomberg reported. The company says “the demarcation of protected lands was carried out by government agencies,” the report states. Communities near the MRN mine have complained of feeling sick, telling Bloomberg the fish have mostly disappeared and water is no longer suitable for drinking or washing. Some communities receive government-issued water purification tablets and others get water piped in through white plastic tubes that come out of the ground. Vladimir Senra Moreira, director of sustainability at the mining company, told Bloomberg that he respects the opinions of community members, but “the data we have from monitoring don’t exactly make a causal connection between their claims of water contamination and mining activities.” MRN has been fined more than $6.5 million for 29 infractions over the past two decades by the government’s environmental agency but a spokesperson for the agency told Bloomberg MRN has paid less than 10% of that amount. MRN is appealing the fines. According to shipping records reviewed by Bloomberg and anonymous sources, F-150 suppliers Arconic Corp., Novelis Inc., and Constellium SE all use "aluminum purchased from Alcoa or Rio Tinto smelters in Canada’s Quebec province that receive alumina from Alunorte," the news agency reported. |
Ford finds fresh battery issue Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. confirmed Friday that it told some F-150 Lightning customers about a battery issue in some units of the all-electric pickup that may prevent the vehicle from shifting into drive. The Dearborn automaker said it is conducting a customer satisfaction program to remedy the issue it identified using connected-vehicle data, spokesperson Maria Buczkowski told The Detroit News. CNBC first reported the issue. The problem was identified in about 100 vehicles. A battery performance issue may prevent the vehicle from shifting into drive; if it were to happen while the vehicle is being driven, it could result in a loss of speed, but Buczkowski said Ford is not aware of any instances of that happening. The fix is a battery module replacement. "In this case of a potentially defective battery module, Ford is contacting customers to go to a dealer and get the suspect module replaced," Buczkowski said. The issue comes after Ford earlier this week confirmed a separate problem with a unit of the Lightning that the company does not believe is related. On Wednesday, the automaker said that a battery fire discovered Feb. 4 prompted a production stoppage on the Lightning, which is built at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn. Ford is keeping production on the truck down through at least the end of next week as it continues to look into the issue and applies its finding to the battery production process. The automaker has said that it identified an issue with a Lightning unit "during a standard pre-delivery quality inspection," and that a battery fire started while the vehicle was parked in a holding lot. The company believes it has identified the cause of that defect. In all, Ford said the process could take a few weeks to resolve. It will continue holding Lightning units that have been assembled but not yet delivered. It doesn't believe any vehicles that customers have taken delivery of are affected. The supplier of the F-150 Lightning batteries is SK On, a South Korean company with a plant in Georgia. The Lightning, and Ford's ability to boost production of it, is a key part of the automaker's EV strategy. The automaker is targeting an annual EV run rate of 600,000 units by the end of this year and 2 million units by the end of 2026. Meanwhile, Ford's Louisville Assembly Plant will be down again next week after production was idled this week. Local media have reported that the plant is working through issues with the launch of the Ford Escape, which was refreshed for model year 2023. “We are committed to ensuring our vehicles are built with the quality our customers deserve and will take the appropriate actions to deliver this commitment," Ford spokesperson Kelli Felker said in a statement. Quality has been a major issue for Ford and one that executives have identified as a top priority to fix as they attempt to take out a multibillion-dollar cost disadvantage they say the company has. High warranty costs are part of the problem, they've said. The company is eyeing about $1 billion in reductions in costs tied to warranties. Ford said Friday that it's in touch with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about both issues with the Lightning. |
‘The risk of harm is real’: In a bid to free nurses for more complicated care, personal support workers could be authorized to administer basic medications. By Rob Ferguson
In a bid to free nurses for more complicated care, personal support workers typically tasked with dressing, feeding and toileting residents could be authorized — with extra training — to administer basic medications under new measures proposed by Premier Doug Ford’s government. The potential regulatory changes include adding COVID-19 vaccines to the list of immunizations that must be offered, requiring that air conditioning in “designated cooling areas” of nursing homes be hooked up to emergency generators in the event of summer power failures, and $25,000 fines for not having air conditioning in the rooms of all residents. But it’s the proposal to have PSWs give noncontrolled medications, under approval of a home’s registered nursing staff, that is raising concerns in some quarters. “It really is an acknowledgment of the dire straits of our health human resources, particularly as it relates to the dramatic, severe shortage of nurses that we have right now,” says Liberal MPP Dr. Adil Shamji (Don Valley East), an emergency room physician. “Historically, nurses have been the ones administering medications, for which they are singularly qualified and trained.” The proposed changes posted online Feb. 3 are described by the Ministry of Long-Term Care as “part of an ongoing evolution of the legislative framework intended to enhance quality of care and quality of life for residents.” A public comment period on the measures to be shepherded by Long-Term Care Minister Paul Calan Speaking confidentially on background to discuss internal matters, a ministry official said any A public comment period on the measures to be shepherded by Long-Term Care Minister Paul Calandra closes March 5 medicines given directly to residents by PSWs would be prescribed by doctors or nurse practitioners and dispensed by nurses, and would involve basic meds like oral or topical antibiotics and pain-fighting acetaminophen. This is already done in retirement and group homes and is now allowed in nursing homes under temporary rules that expire at the end of April, the official added. Nurses would continue to do injections, IVs and give any controlled medications such as narcotics to residents, the official stressed. Details on any medication training programs for PSWs are yet to be determined, but Shamji said the education would have to be “substantial.” “Oral medications can, if administered inappropriately or to the wrong individual, cause a significant amount of harm.” The changes are supported by an organization representing the majority of nursing homes, including for-profit, not-for-profit and municipally owned facilities. “They support flexibility,” says chief executive Donna Duncan of the Ontario Long-Term Care Association. “It is a pivotal time for long-term care.” The Ontario Nurses’ Association is firmly opposed to having PSWs or any other nursing home staff give medicines to residents. “Further watering down regulations to allow unregulated health-care providers to administer medication ignores the standards that currently exist,” says Bernie Robinson, interim president of the ONA. With an increasing reliance on temp agency nurses in long-term care homes because of the nursing shortage, “there is inconsistent staffing and training” that makes supervision more difficult, Robinson warns. “The real solution is not to expand the scope of unregulated health-care professionals, who, like everyone working in health care, are already managing unreasonable workloads. The solution is to increase staffing levels across the board, so we have the nurses we need to properly care for residents.” New Democrat MPP France Gelinas (Nickel Belt), her party’s veteran health critic and a physiotherapist by training, says she is worried having both PSWs and nurses giving medications to residents could lead to mix-ups. Noting most residents are on multiple medications several times a day, “the risk of error, the risk of harm is real,” she adds, noting many long-term care homes fared poorly and had high illness and death rates in the pandemic. “I suppose it can be done safely if you have very strong oversight, but we don’t.” Gelinas is also concerned nursing homes will use the change to scale back on nurses to save money and boost profits, relying more on lower-paid PSWs. On the need for an education program for PSWs delivering medicines to residents, Shamji said “it would need to indicate some of the potential risks of mixing the wrong medications and understanding the importance of timing them correctly.” “There are many medications that have very similar names and titles that do dramatically different things, are from entirely different classes of drugs and can have severe consequences … if the wrong one is administered,” he adds. The ministry official said the proposed regulatory changes to the 2021 Fixing Long-Term Care Act would also make it more difficult to get exemptions for providing air conditioning in nursing homes and more closely define what types of cooling systems can properly be called air conditioning |
Prioritize retiree’s pensions
Feb 19, 2023 A private member’s bill with all-party support in the House of Commons currently before a Senate Committee could fundamentally improve pension security for retirees across the country. Bill C-228, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act and the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985, would amend bankruptcy and insolvency legislation to give “super-priority” to funding the deficit of a pension plan. “For too long workers have witnessed employers paying out corporate bonuses or paying creditors after declaring bankruptcy, all while the company’s own pension deficit is allowed to go unfunded. This often forces already-retired workers into poverty as their pension benefits are slashed,” said Lana Payne, Unifor National President. “It doesn’t have to be this way. All the Senate needs to do is to pass Bill C-228 as-is, which already received unanimous support in the House of Commons.” Les MacDonald, Unifor National Executive Board Retirees Representative, presented to the Senate committee on Feb. 15, 2023. He asked the Senators to respect retirees and pass the bill into law. “In bargaining, pensions are a large portion of monetary conversations. Members end up making immediate sacrifices to their present wages in order to earn long-term, guaranteed retirement benefits. However, the current BIA and CCAA statutes do not offer any protections that can provide peace of mind at retirement for a pension that is being drawn particularly from a single employer defined benefit pension plan,” said MacDonald to the Senate committee. Currently, if an employer has a defined-benefit pension plan and declares bankruptcy or insolvency, the plan needs to be wound up so that all pension assets are paid out. Pension plans may suffer from wind up deficits, a term that calculates the amount of additional money needed to fund the benefits to 100% for retirees on the date of wind up. Bill C-228 will put any outstanding amounts due to the pension fund wind up ahead of secured creditors, regardless whether the corporate entity declares bankruptcy or restructuring. MacDonald drew on examples from Unifor’s own history and membership, where bankruptcy and insolvency of a company led to disastrous effects for retired workers, including the well-publicized Sears Canada bankruptcy. “Eddie Lampert, Sears Canada’s largest shareholder, landlord and supplier doled out $6 billion dollars to buy back shares and dividends from 2005 onwards to profit himself, yet the company continued to carry a $260 million pension deficit that would have been extinguished easily, had Bill C-228 been the law in 2017. “By end of Dec 2015, Sears reported 14,015 retirees with an average annual lifetime pension of only 5,141 Canadian dollars, literally $428 per month. While Unifor wasted no effort in representing our Sears retirees in insolvency, they were forced to settle with a 30% cut to these already low benefits,” MacDonald added. Retirees earn their pensions during their working career. These deferred wages must be guaranteed, especially where the employer has every ability to pay their own pension deficits. Add your name to the Congress of Union Retirees of Canada’s petition in support of this Bill, and tell the Senators to protect pensions.
|
New $265,000,000 electric
By Ryan Rumbolt Plans for a $265-million electric vehicle battery facility in Brampton could bring more than 500 new jobs in the auto sector to the city. On Wednesday (Feb. 15) the Province announced that Toronto-based automotive supplier Magna International is expanding its Ontario operations to include a new EV battery enclosure facility in Brampton. The facility will cost some $ 265 million to build and is slated to open later this year. The Province says the expansion will create approximately 560 new jobs in Brampton and the surrounding region once the facility is at full production. “The cars of the future and the batteries that power them will be built right here in Ontario, by Ontario workers,” Ontario Premier Doug Ford said while making the announcement in Brampton. Magna says the new Brampton facility will be a 490,000-square-foot facility and experts to start operations in the second quarter of 2023. But Magna isn’t bringing more auto sector jobs to Brampton alone. The new EV battery enclosure facility is just one part of a $471 million expansion by Magna, including adding a $140 million electrical coating and painting operation to its Guelph facility, a $24 million expansion of its Newmarket plant to produce electrical door and hood latching units, and $35 million upgrade to Magna’s lighting division in Belleville. The Province says the investment will create up to 475 more new jobs across Magna’s five other facilities in Guelph, Windsor, Belleville, Newmarket, and Penetanguishene, supported by $23.6 million in funding through Invest Ontario. Magna International got its start as a tool-and-die manufacturer in Toronto more than 65 years ago and has grown to become one of the largest suppliers of car components with 168,000 employees worldwide. Wednesday’s announcement is just the latest investment by the Province in Brampton’s electric vehicle industry and follows a $513 million commitment to help Stellantis overhaul its Brampton and Windsor plants, converting them to multi-energy vehicle assembly facilities ready to produce electric vehicles. The auto manufacturer is planning to revamp its Brampton facility with a flexible assembly line capable of producing battery-electric and hybrid vehicles, diversifying the automaker’s capacity to meet growing consumer demand for low-emission vehicles. Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown called the Magna facility further proof of Brampton’s forward momentum. “The fact this facility will be focused on the burgeoning electric vehicle market only adds to that momentum and bolsters our City’s reputation as a leader in innovation and advanced manufacturing,” Brown said in a statement. Over the last two years, the Province says it has attracted $16.5 billion in investments by global automakers and suppliers, including more than $12.5 billion in EV and EV battery-related manufacturing investments |
What Ontario drivers need to Automatic Licence Plate Readers have started being used in the GTA with the roll out to continue in the coming weeks. February 17, 2023 OPP Sgt. Kerry Schmidt told CTV News Toronto the Automatic Licence Plate Reader (ALPR) system expansion began on Monday in the Greater Toronto Area, and will continue to rollout further across Ontario in the coming weeks. “We have been using it for several years in a limited capacity,” Schmidt said in an interview. “Now, it’s being rolled out to every car across the province.” Schmidt said the ALPR technology instantly notifies police of things like expired registration, arrest warrants, or if a vehicle is stolen. It also has the capability of capturing vehicles of interest during amber alerts. Up to three cameras are mounted on top of police cruisers. One or two cameras point forward, and one points backwards, so that an officer can scan cars in multiple directions. Schmidt said the technology will be a "game changer" for police, who can now scan hundreds of licence plates within minutes while monitoring the roadways. For example, within 22 minutes of patrolling Highway 403 in Mississauga on Monday, Schmidt said the system was able to flag 32 vehicles for infractions. He said the system identified one suspended driver, four unlicenced drivers, and 27 expired vehicle registrations. The number vehicles being flagged were coming in so fast it was impossible to keep up with pulling them over, Schmidt said. The Ontario government announced in February 2022 they would invest in the ALPR technology as part of “its commitment to provide police with the tools they need to do their jobs.” “We are seeing a massive increase in unregistered vehicles,” Schmidt said. He said Ontario drivers are neglecting to renew their registrations since licence plate stickers are no longer needed, and is warning people to keep their registration up to date to avoid fines. |
Ford to slash thousands of Europe Feb 16, 2023 US carmaker says job losses over next three years will include some 2,300 positions in Germany and 1,300 in the UK. Car manufacturing giant Ford has said it plans to cut thousands of jobs across Europe over the next three years as part of a global drive to reduce costs and be competitive in the electric vehicle market. Some 3,800 jobs will be axed in total, including 2,300 at the United States-based carmaker’s Cologne and Aachen sites in Germany; 1,300 in the United Kingdom; and 200 in the rest of Europe. The moves announced on Tuesday will see one in nine jobs within the company’s product development and administration divisions on the continent slashed in total. Ford said it was looking for “a leaner, more competitive cost structure” in Europe. It added it will embark on consultations “with the intent to achieve the reductions through voluntary separation programs”. ‘Difficult decisions, not taken lightly’ The job cuts came amid a sea change in the global car industry from gas-guzzling combustion engines to electric vehicles. Governments are pushing to reduce the emissions that contribute to climate change, and a resulting race to develop electric vehicles has generated intense competition among carmakers. Ford is spending $50bn on electrifying its product range, pivoting to a slimmer lineup with higher prices to compensate for the rising costs of producing electric cars. It said its strategy to offer an all-electric fleet in Europe by 2035 has not changed and that production of its first European-built electric car is due to start later this year. “Paving the way to a sustainably profitable future for Ford in Europe requires broad-based actions and changes in the way we develop, build and sell Ford vehicles,” Martin Sander, general manager of Ford’s Model e unit in Europe, said in a statement. US politics, Canada’s multiculturalism, South America’s geopolitical rise—we bring you the stories that matter. “This will impact the organisational structure, talent and skills we will need in the future,” he added. Ford will retain some 3,400 engineers in the region who will build on core technology provided by their US counterparts and adapt it to European customers, Sander said. Cost-reduction drive Chief Financial Officer John Lawler warned in early February that the carmaker faced $5bn in higher costs this year and said the company would be “very aggressive” in reducing expenses in its manufacturing and supply chain operations. Lawler also said at the time that the productivity of engineers in Europe was 25-30 percent lower than it should be. Cuts in the UK, which amount to one in five of the workforce there, will be mostly at the carmaker’s research centre in Dunton, southeast England. The cuts in Germany equate to about 12 percent of the workforce there. Ford’s European staff last saw a wave of job cuts in 2019 and 2020 as the carmaker pursued a 6-percent operating margin in the region, a goal thrown off course by the COVID-19 pandemic, with pretax profit margins in Europe in the first nine months of 2022 at just 2.2 percent of sales. Across the continent, Ford has some 34,000 employees at wholly owned facilities and consolidated joint ventures. |
Ford to announce $2.5B The Detroit News Ford Motor Co. on Monday is expected to detail a multibillion-dollar investment with a Chinese company to build an electric-vehicle battery plant on a site in mid-Michigan, The Detroit News has confirmed. The Dearborn automaker is poised to unveil a project worth at least $2.5 billion that would create roughly 2,500 jobs in partnership with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., the world's largest producer of lithium iron phosphate batteries, according to four sources with knowledge of the project who were not authorized to discuss it ahead of Monday's announcement. The project will land on the Marshall Megasite, a 1,900-acre property in southwest Michigan's Calhoun County that local and state officials have long been preparing for such a development. Under the plan, Ford would own the land and plant and manage the workforce; CATL would be the technology partner to develop and build LFP batteries for Ford's electric vehicles; and Ford would be the recipient of any state incentives, the scope of which are still taking shape. Ford and the Michigan Economic Development Corp. declined comment. A spokesman for Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Bobby Leddy, said he couldn't "speculate on specific projects" and touted policies designed to "quicken Michigan's economic momentum." Ford has scheduled a news conference in Romulus for Monday afternoon "to share news on how Ford, America's No. 2 EV company in 2022, is working to scale EVs quickly and, ultimately, make them more accessible to customers." The governor is scheduled to attend. Momentum for the Ford-CATL deal coalesced around Michigan as a finalist after Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a Republican and possible 2024 presidential candidate, in December said he pulled Virginia out of consideration for the project due to his objections over the involvement of a Chinese partner and its alleged ties to China's ruling communist party. In recent days, signs emerged that Ford was closing in on the Marshall site, which sits near the interchange of Interstate 69 and I-94 in an agricultural community just over 100 miles west of Detroit. Two Ford government affairs executives met with Calhoun County leaders Wednesday to brief them on details of the proposal, two sources familiar with the situation confirmed to The News earlier this week. Bolstered by new federal incentives to support the buildout of domestic supply chains for EV components, Detroit's automakers are racing to establish domestic battery manufacturing bases. They have largely made these investments with partners based in Asia. Ford, for example, is building battery plants in Tennessee and Kentucky with South Korean partner SK On, and General Motors Co. is partnering with South Korean company LG Energy Solution on a trio of battery plants in Ohio, Michigan and Tennessee. Over the past several weeks, the Marshall Area Economic Development Alliance, or MAEDA, has acquired more than 1,000 acres comprised of several properties to put them under a single owner. James Durian, CEO of the Marshall development alliance, wrote in a letter obtained by The News earlier this week that the company interested in the Megasite would create an estimated 2,500 "new high-paying jobs in the EV battery manufacturing industry." "MAEDA is in the process of purchasing property and we have a company that is showing strong interest," Durian wrote. "The property purchases are with MEDC funding. The Township and City have meetings to transfer some Megasite property from the township to the City to advance the development process." In an interview with The News, Durian added MAEDA has purchased more than 700 acres and is adding more this week. MAEDA has almost 2,000 acres under option agreements and is in the process of purchasing another 400 acres, he said: “As we get funding and permission from the state, we're purchasing properties." Last year, Ford said it had reached a memorandum of understanding with CATL to explore a battery supply agreement. At that time, the Dearborn automaker also said it planned to localize LFP battery production in North America, though executives at the time declined to provide further information. A privately held company with global operations and since 2018 a location in Auburn Hills, CATL is already one of Ford's battery suppliers. The automaker previously said that the Chinese company would supply full LFP battery packs for the Mustang Mach-E in North America starting this year, and for the F-150 Lightning starting next year. Localizing battery cell production through partnerships with battery makers has been key to the strategies of Ford and other automakers to shore up their EV supply chains amid an increasingly competitive environment. Ford aims to produce 600,000 EVs globally by the end of this year and 2 million globally by 2026 as it chases market leader Tesla Inc. Meanwhile, steps were taken in Lansing this week to replenish a business incentive program that could benefit the Ford-CATL project. The balance of Michigan's Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve, or SOAR, fund is roughly $890 million, with nearly $400 million of that committed to battery projects by Chinese-controlled Gotion Inc. and Novi-based Our Next Energy. The Michigan House approved a bill Thursday that would divert about $500 million in corporate income tax revenue toward SOAR each year for the next three years, but only after corporate income tax revenue breaches $1.2 billion and $100 million is given to housing and community development efforts. The funding plan still requires the approval of the Senate and Whitmer's signature. Whitmer also sought in her budget Wednesday an additional $800 million one-time deposit into the fund, but it's not clear when or if the Legislature would appropriate that funding. The SOAR fund was established in December 2021 after Ford's selection of Kentucky and Tennessee for an $11.4 billion investment with SK On in an EV assembly plant and multiple battery plants shook Lansing political leaders and the business community. The fund has benefited Gotion, Our Next Energy Inc., as well as General Motors Co., which is making EV investments in Lake Orion and Delta Township. U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Tipton, who represents the Marshall area in Congress, said neither Ford nor the governor's office communicated with him about the deal before it was secured. Having more than 2,500 "jobs come to the Marshall community is good news and reflects a local emphasis on creating conditions ripe for investment," he told The News via email. "However, it is concerning to have a Chinese battery manufacturer, especially considering recent provocations." U.S.-China relations are considered to be at their lowest point in decades, as economic competition between the two superpowers ratchets up and political and diplomatic tensions remain high. Disentangling U.S. supply chains and protecting intellectual property from China is currently a rare area of bipartisan agreement in Washington. Less than a week ago, a U.S. fighter jet shot down a Chinese spy balloon over the Atlantic. Whitmer has not expressed concerns about the Chinese battery maker's involvement. After Youngkin, a potential GOP presidential nominee, rejected the plant in his state, Whitmer used an interview with The News to call the move a "political determination," adding: "We are proud that Ford is an American company, Ford is a Michigan company. We are going to compete for every opportunity for the State of Michigan." The MEDC has earmarked grants totaling more than $1.6 million for site preparation efforts and due diligence studies for the Marshall Megasite, according to the agency. Those funds have gone to Calhoun County and MAEDA. “Assembling the land for a project like this is a long-term effort and something that we have over the last 18 months aggressively caught up with other states that I've been doing this for a decade or more,” Josh Hundt, MEDC chief project officer, said in an interview Thursday. “We needed to be able to move along with the speed of business to have these sites ready. And the businesses needed to see that they were able to access the land and that it was land that was available for their type of development.” He added: “Site development is an important aspect of our overall economic development strategy here in the state, and it is a component to making sure that our economic development efforts are best in class and provide locations for projects that bring jobs to Michigan. Our role is really ensuring that we continue to partner with the community to develop this site and working with other communities across the state to develop other sites.” |
As surgical wait lists grow, Surgeries scheduled within weeks with price tags over $20K prompt concerns over 2-tiered health care Mike Crawley It's a contentious reality in a country with a universal medicare system: Canadians can pay to sidestep the queue for surgeries with long waiting lists, such as hip and knee replacements. Private clinics across Canada are advertising to prospective patients that within weeks they can get surgeries that typically take six months or more under provincial health plans. The price for a single hip or knee replacement runs in the range of $20,000 to $28,000, depending on the clinic. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic driving up surgical wait times, there's some evidence suggesting a growing number of Canadians are pulling out their wallets to pay privately. The trend is raising concerns about the potential for private clinics to drain more health professionals away from the already strained public system, and it's provoking fears that two-tier health care is becoming a reality. The private Duval Clinic in Laval, Que. — where surgeons only do hip and knee replacements for fee-paying patients — has seen a significant increase in demand over the past few years, says its medical director, Dr. Pascal-André Vendittoli. "We've quadrupled the number of cases we do at the clinic," said Vendittoli in an interview with CBC News. "There are more and more patients willing to pay for their hip or knee replacement because they see that it is almost impossible to get their treatment in the public system." Mike Johansen, 62, of Edmonton spent $23,500 for a hip replacement at the Duval Clinic. "Best investment I ever made," Johansen said in an interview. "I don't look at myself as a person who jumped to the front of the queue, I got out of the queue." Before the operation, Johansen's hip problem made just about any movement painful. "About 70, 80 per cent of the time I was laying in bed. That was the only way that there really wasn't a whole lot of pain," he said. His doctor told him his wait for surgery through Alberta Health Services would be 18 to 24 months. He got into the Duval clinic in just two months. Hip and knee replacements are among the most frequently performed surgeries in the Canadian health system, and come with some of the longest wait times. Hospitals did nearly 139,000 joint replacements in 2019-2020, according to the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Its research puts the average cost per operation at $12,223, which means the private clinics are charging patients roughly double what the surgery costs provincial medicare systems. CIHI's most recent wait-time figures show that just 65 per cent of hip replacements and 59 per cent of knee replacements were done within the national standard of six months after consultation with a surgeon. The private sector's potential role in tackling surgical wait lists is firmly in the spotlight right now:
Canadian Surgery Solutions is a Calgary branch of a company called Clearpoint Health Network, the country's largest chain of private surgical clinics. Nearly 140,000 people get a hip or knee replacement each year in Canadian hospitals and wait times can run to more than a year. Private surgical clinics around the country are advertising that patients can get surgeries done in just a few weeks, if they pay. Clearpoint is wholly owned by Kensington Private Equity Fund, and it was created in 2019 through a $35 million purchase of private clinics. The company announced an expansion in January, taking Clearpoint to 53 operating rooms across 14 surgical clinics, touching every province from British Columbia to Quebec. Most patients must leave home province to pay Clearpoint officials did not respond to repeated requests from CBC News for an interview. While the company says 90 per cent of the surgeries it performs are publicly funded, Clearpoint also markets to Canadians waiting for care in the public system that they can get hip and knee replacements done much faster by paying privately. "Avoid long wait times," says the website of Surgical Solutions Network, a division of Clearpoint. "After your initial surgical consultation, surgery can generally be scheduled within a few weeks." The company explains a catch to patients who want to pay: they'll likely have to leave their home province for the operation. The website of Surgical Solutions Network, a division of Clearpoint Health Network, describes how Canadian patients can pay privately for surgery by travelling to another province. (surgicalsolutionsnetwork.ca) The Canada Health Act prohibits extra-billing. What that means is doctors are banned from charging patients more than the medicare rate for an "insured service" — any medically necessary procedure that is covered by provincial health plans. In provinces other than Quebec, where the system differs, private clinics get around that ban by operating only on patients from other provinces. This loophole is opened up by how the Canada Health Act and the provinces define an insured service. A medically necessary non-emergency surgery such as a hip replacement is an insured service when you're in your home province. When you visit another province, non-emergency surgery is not insured. The upshot: a doctor in a private clinic in Toronto cannot charge an Ontario patient for a hip replacement, but can charge someone who has flown in from any other province for that very same operation. CBC News obtained an email from a Clearpoint official to a prospective hip replacement patient in Ontario. "Unfortunately, due to government regulations, you are unable to have private surgery in your home province. You would need to travel to Calgary for the procedure," said the email, which also priced the surgery at $28,000. "It's not in keeping with the principles of the Canada Health Act," said Dr. David Urbach, chief of surgery at Women's College Hospital in Toronto. Urbach argues that the growth in private-paid surgeries worsens wait lists by luring medical staff away from public hospitals. "It increases wait times for the rest of the people who are still in the public system because of the loss of resources from that public system into the private system," said Urbach in an interview. He says governments should not be looking to the private sector to shorten surgical wait lists, but could achieve the same goal by better investing in public hospitals. As evidence, Urbach gestures at the location of his interview: a state-of-the art operating room, not in use for surgery on a weekday morning, because medical staff aren't available. "If the hospital had funding, if this hospital had staffing, it could be used to provide all sorts of surgical procedures," he said. 'No way I could afford ... that' The growth in private surgical clinics leaves Saskatchewan resident Vicki Macdonald, 59, worried for the future of the health system. In the birthplace of Canadian medicare, Macdonald spent two years waiting for knee surgery. "I got slower and slower in my walking," said Macdonald in an interview at her home in Kronau, Sask. "When you are in that much pain, it really takes a toll on your emotional and mental well-being." She found out that people were shortening their waits by paying for their surgeries in private clinics outside the province, but dismissed the idea for herself. "There is no way I could afford to do something like that," Macdonald said. "Those that can afford it can get it, and then we who need it just as bad are getting left behind." Urbach says the apparent rise in people willing to pay privately for surgeries saddens him. "What it tells me is we're not addressing the needs of the population. We should be able to provide the services that people need in a reasonable time frame," Urbach said. "What we need to do is create the types of system changes so that people aren't driven to pay out of pocket or seek out two-tiered care." The only jurisdiction where residents can opt for private surgery without leaving the province is Quebec, a result of a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that applies strictly to the Quebec health system. In British Columbia, Dr. Brian Day has attempted to persuade courts that patients should have the right to pay for private care when wait times in the public system are too long. Day, owner of the private Cambie Surgery Centre, lost at the B.C. Court of Appeal in July 2022 and is asking the Supreme Court of Canada to consider his case. |
Ford CEO teases F-150
February 9, 2023 F1 Driver Daniel Ricciardo got an up close look Ford is working on a secret truck you can be sure will be lightning-quick. Red Bull F1 driver Daniel Ricciardo visited with Ford in Michigan on Wednesday, following last week's announcement that the racing outfit and automaker are teaming up for the 2026 season. Ricciardo returned to Red Bull this year as its reserve driver and is tasked primarily with testing and promotions. He met up with the Ford Performance team at the M1 Concourse racetrack in Pontiac, Michigan. While there, he got to check out a few vehicles and take a racing Mustang for a spin. Ford CEO Jim Farley also gave him – and the Twitterverse – a preview of a special project that's in the works, posting a photo of the two next to an F-150 Lightning pickup covered in a sheet with a front corner exposed. Not much can be seen, but the truck has clearly been modified with new front bodywork and wheels and has what might be a wing behind the cabin poking up through the sheet. Ford had previously teased the vehicle alongside its F1 announcement with a graphic that included an F-150 silhouette alongside several other EV projects it has built, including a 1,400 horsepower version of the Mustang Mach-E. The production version of the F-150 Lightning is already available with a dual-motor drivetrain with 580 hp and 775 lb-ft of torque and can accelerate to 60 mph in four seconds. Neither Farley nor Ricciardo said when the wraps would come all the way off the project truck. |
Ford to launch Formula 1 Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. on Friday is returning to Formula 1 after more than 20 years, and just weeks after crosstown rival General Motors Co. said it was joining forces with Andretti Global to launch a bid to compete in one of the world's most prestigious motor races. Ford is partnering with Red Bull Powertrains to develop a next-gen hybrid power unit for the 2026 Formula 1 season, according to a news release. Red Bull Ford will provide the power units for the Oracle Red Bull Racing and Scuderia AlphaTauri teams starting in 2026 and continuing at least up to 2030. Work on developing the new power unit is slated to begin this year, the companies said. Ford's return to the FIA Formula One World Championship comes amid a surge in popularity in F1 racing, and as the sport transitions to a "more electrified future," the automaker said in a news release. “This is the start of a thrilling new chapter in Ford’s motorsports story that began when my great-grandfather won a race that helped launch our company,” Bill Ford, Ford executive chair, said in a statement. “Ford is returning to the pinnacle of the sport, bringing Ford’s long tradition of innovation, sustainability and electrification to one of the world’s most visible stages.” Ford left the sport in 2004 but noted that the company remains the third most successful engine manufacturer in F1 history. “The news today that Ford is coming to Formula 1 from 2026 is great for the sport and we are excited to see them join the incredible automotive partners already in Formula 1,” Stefano Domenicali, president and CEO of Formula 1, said in a statement. “Ford is a global brand with an incredible heritage in racing and the automotive world and they see the huge value that our platform provides with over half a billion fans around the world," he added. "Our commitment to be Net Zero Carbon by 2030 and to introduce sustainable fuels in the F1 cars from 2026 is also an important reason for their decision to enter F1. We believe that our sport provides the opportunity and reach unlike any other and we cannot wait for the Ford logo to be racing round F1’s iconic circuits from 2026.” Meanwhile, Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a statement that the comeback reflects Ford's direction as a company: "increasingly electric, software-defined, modern vehicles and experiences. F1 will be an incredibly cost-effective platform to innovate, share ideas and technologies, and engage with tens of millions of new customers." Ford and Red Bull Powertrains said that some areas of collaboration include combustion engine development, battery cell and electric motor technology, power unit control software and analytics. “As an independent engine manufacturer to have the ability to benefit from an OEM’s experience like Ford puts us in good stead against the competition," Christian Horner, Oracle Red Bull Racing Team principal and CEO, said in a statement. "They are a manufacturer rich in motoring history that spans generations. From Jim Clark to Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher, the lineage speaks for itself. For us as Red Bull Powertrains to open the next chapter of that dynasty, as Red Bull Ford, is tremendously exciting" The move also marks an expansion of Ford Performance's ambitions and ventures. “We will be competing to win in F1, the pinnacle for motor sport, with Red Bull Racing," said Farley. "You will see the world’s most popular sports coupe, the Mustang, race from the grass roots to Australian Supercars to NASCAR to Le Mans. And will build our off-road leadership in the World Rally Championship, King of Hammers and to the Baha 1000 and more. All the while, we’ll continue to excite the world with cool demonstrators like SuperVan 4 and Mustang Mach-E 1400.” |
'Accountability starts at the Jordyn Grzelewski Senior-level managers at Ford Motor Co. will see reductions to their annual bonuses following a 2022 earnings report that CEO Jim Farley said "fell short" of the company's potential, The Detroit News has learned. Each year, the Dearborn automaker establishes companywide targets for its Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, or AICP. The company's performance on those targets is used to calculate a global Business Performance Factor, essentially a multiplier that goes into determining bonus payouts. For 2022, the company exceeded those targets and that factor was set at 148%. Ford posted $10.4 billion in earnings before interest and taxes last year, a key profitability metric, and factors such as service warranty improvements and strong operating cash flow drove the company to hit the targets used to determine employee incentives. But overall, executives — as well as investors and analysts — weren't pleased with Ford's 2022 financial performance. The dissatisfaction among investors was reflected Friday in the automaker's stock price, which closed down 7.6% to $13.23 in New York. Most of the company's salaried workforce will have their personal bonus targets multiplied by 148%. But upper management will see their performance factor reduced to 90%, a move aimed at fostering accountability, according to a letter to employees obtained by The News. "This decision was not made lightly, but accountability starts at the top," CEO Jim Farley and Chief Financial Officer John Lawler wrote in the note. "Our senior leaders have a significant impact on driving the business results and must live up to the high standards we need to create a vibrant, profitably growing Ford." The move applies to those categorized as "LL3" and above, which are leadership-level employees. In the letter to employees, Farley and Lawler referenced Ford's 2022 earnings, which were reported Thursday and showed the automaker posting a $2 billion net loss and missing its guidance on earnings before interest and taxes by $1 billion. EBIT came in $1.1 billion below the automaker's guidance of $11.5 billion. Executives chalked the results up largely to issues around cost, quality and supply-chain management. “Our fourth-quarter and full-year financial performance last year fell short of our potential. And while we generated cash flow, we left about $2 billion in profit on the table, due to cost and especially continued supply chain issues," Farley told analysts Thursday. "To say I’m frustrated is an understatement because the year could have been so much more for us at Ford.” The 148% Business Performance Factor, per the letter, was driven by Ford's strong operating cash flow in 2022 and net improvements in its quality objective. "However, the reality is we still have a lot of work to improve execution and strengthen our business, as demonstrated by our earnings results," Farley and Lawler wrote. "We are committed to fostering a culture of excellence, and taking accountability when our overall performance doesn’t meet expectations — our own and those of our stakeholders." The companywide performance factor is not the only metric used to determine bonuses. Personal performance also is a factor, among others, so payouts vary by employee. In explaining the earnings miss to analysts and the bonus calculations to employees, Farley and Lawler emphasized that they believe Ford has the right strategy and is making progress, but still has work to do in areas like improving quality and taking costs out of its industrial system. A year ago, Ford paid bonuses to top executives and lower-level salaried employees at 108% of their targets, while mid-level managers received 135% payouts. Crosstown rival General Motors Co. earlier this week confirmed that it lowered the percentage in the performance plan payout the automaker uses to determine a salaried employee's bonus payout this year. The percentage this year is 158%, down from last year's 200%. Meanwhile, eligible full-time hourly workers at Ford will receive up to $9,176 in profit-sharing bonuses for 2022, the company said Thursday. The Dearborn automaker employs about 56,000 hourly workers in the U.S. Profit-sharing checks to eligible workers will be distributed in early March. Per the automaker's contract with the United Auto Workers, the payouts are based on pretax earnings in North America for the previous calendar year. For every $1 billion in adjusted earnings before interest and taxes, eligible UAW members at Ford plants and other facilities receive $1,000. In North America, Ford reported pre-tax earnings of $9.2 billion in 2022. Last year, eligible hourly workers at Ford received up to $7,377 in profit-sharing based on 2021 results. GM, which reported $9.9 billion in profits last year and met its guidance for the year, said earlier this week it will pay its 42,300 eligible hourly workers a record $12,750 in profit sharing. |
A national strategy on aging? As momentum builds towards next week’s first-ministers’ health-care meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and in the wake of national long-term care standards being established, health-care leaders couldn’t be clearer in their call for a national strategy. By Moira Welsh Now that Canada has new – albeit voluntary – national long-term care standards, advocates say the federal government needs a national strategy to support aging. It is not the first such call for a seniors’ strategy but as momentum builds toward Tuesday’s first-ministers’ health-care meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Dr. Amit Arya is leading demands for a federal-provincial collaboration to improve access to primary care teams that include a mix of family doctors, palliative-care physicians, geriatricians, nurses, mental health and rehabilitation professionals who can support the later decades of life. “It’s a golden opportunity to start transforming elder care in Canada,” said Arya, who is head of palliative care at Toronto’s not-for-profit Kensington Health and a lecturer for the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto. “I’m really hopeful at this point in time, given the devastation that we’ve seen in the COVID-19 pandemic and the impacts on our health-care system — our collapsing health-care system at times — that we’re seeing this unprecedented moment where finally, there’s some hope of collaboration.” On Friday morning, Arya joined Dr. Joseph Wong, founder of the not-for-profit Yee Hong Centre for Geriatric Care and registered nurse Laura Bulmer at a news conference organized by the Institute for Change Leaders, a group founded in 2016 by former Trinity-Spadina NDP MP Olivia Chow. Located in Toronto Metropolitan University, the Institute’s advisers include Bernie Farber, a human-rights consultant, Patrick Gossage, founder of Media Profile and Naheed Hassan, an entrepreneur. While supportive of the new long-term care standards, the group issued a press release calling for a national plan for seniors’ care focused on frontline staff and “transparent, measurable and mandatory conditions that are enforceable,” in long-term care, home care and palliative care. “As a palliative care physician who works in hospital, home care and long term care, I’ve seen how the health-care system has been experiencing severe strain for many years and now, is on the brink of collapse,” said Arya. “A significant reason for this is that our health-care system is not designed to care for our aging population. Compared to other OECD countries, Canada grossly underfunds community-based elder care supports …And inadequate home care, long-term care and palliative care are definitely contributors to why we have overcrowded emergency rooms and also are major contributors to the ALC (alternate level of care) crisis. Without action, this crisis is only slated to get worse.” |
U.S. Ford hourly workers to Jordyn Grzelewski Ford Motor Co. will pay profit-sharing bonuses of up to $9,176 to hourly autoworkers in the U.S. for 2022, the automaker said Thursday. The Dearborn automaker employs about 56,000 hourly workers in the U.S. Profit-sharing checks to eligible workers will be distributed in early March. Under the automaker's contract with the United Auto Workers, the payouts are based on pretax earnings the company earned in North America for the previous calendar year. For every $1 billion in adjusted earnings before interest and taxes, eligible UAW members at Ford plants and other facilities receive $1,000. In North America, Ford delivered pre-tax profit of $9.2 billion in 2022. "UAW Ford members play a key role in the success of the company through their expertise, extraordinary efforts, and commitment to the jobs they perform each and every day," UAW Vice President Chuck Browning, head of the union's Ford Department, said in a statement. Last year, eligible hourly workers at Ford received up to $7,377 in profit-sharing based on 2021 results. That average payout was more than double the amount from the year before. Ford on Thursday posted a $2 billion net loss for last year, down from 2021's $17.9 billion in profits that had been bolstered by gains on the automaker's investment in electric-vehicle startup Rivian Automotive Inc. The Dearborn automaker's 2022 earnings were hit by a $7.4 billion mark-to-market net loss in Rivian and a $2.7 billion impairment from its investment in autonomous company Argo AI, which was dissolved into Ford and partner Volkswagen AG. Earlier this week, crosstown rival General Motors Co. confirmed it would pay its 42,300 eligible hourly workers a record $12,750 in profit sharing. The payouts will total $500 million, the Detroit automaker said, bringing the three-year total to $1.2 billion. Last year, GM workers received up to $10,250 in profit-sharing. The profit-sharing checks will be paid out as autoworkers, like other U.S. workers, face high inflation, rising interest rates and a possible recession. Stellantis NV reports its financial results and profit sharing for U.S. employees on Feb. 22. |
Jagmeet Singh says the Canada Mark Gollom Federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has been sounding the alarm about privatization creeping into the public health-care system. Recently, Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced he wanted to give a greater role to privately run for-profit clinics. These facilities are clinics operated by the private sector that receive public funding from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) to perform medically necessary procedures. But Singh says he's worried that trend of using public money to fund procedures in private clinics will take resources from the public system. He said the federal government needs to utilize the Canada Health Act (CHA), which he said has significant powers to challenge for-profit privatized care. "And it should be used more regularly and more aggressively to protect public health care," Singh said Monday, speaking to reporters on Parliament Hill. But what exactly does the CHA do, how is it used and is it a tool that those who oppose health-care privatization can rely on to stop that trend? CBC News explains: What is the Canada Health Act? The Canada Health Act, enacted in 1984 after being passed unanimously in the House of Commons, laid out criteria to ensure "reasonable access to health services without financial or other barriers." That meant Canadians would have access to medically necessary services without being directly charged for those services. All such services would be covered through the province or territories' health-care insurance plan, according to the act. During the first question period of the year, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh went after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for calling Ontario's recent moves on health care an 'innovation.' It also established a number of conditions related to health-care access that the provinces and territories had to fulfil in order to receive transfer payments from the federal government, known as the Canada Health Transfer (CHT). One of those conditions stipulated that patients couldn't be charged an extra fee for medically necessary services, also known as "extra-billing." What restrictions are there on private health care? Singh said he wants the government to use the CHA to challenge for-profit care. But there are no restrictions on private delivery inside public health-care systems, said Colleen Flood, director of the Centre for Health Law, Policy and Ethics and University Research Chair at the University of Ottawa. "So what Ford has proposed, with private for-profit clinics, is perfectly fine under the Canada Health Act," she said. The CHA does not forbid the provision of health services by private companies, as long as residents are not charged for insured services, according to the federal government website. "In fact, many aspects of health care in Canada are delivered privately. Family physicians mostly bill the provincial or territorial health-care plan as private contractors. Hospitals are often incorporated private foundations, and many aspects of hospital care (e.g., lab services, housekeeping, and linens) are carried out privately," the website states. "Lastly, in many provinces and territories, private facilities are contracted to provide services under the public health-care insurance plan." It's the finance side of the CHA where restrictions are imposed that disallow patients to be charged out of pocket for medically necessary hospital and physician services, Flood said. Ontario is significantly expanding the number and range of medical procedures performed in privately run clinics. Premier Doug Ford says the move is necessary to improve surgery wait times. "What is medically necessary and how those rules are fixed are determined province by province." No province or territory totally prevents a two-tier system — they just try to make it less appetizing for doctors, she said. "Almost all provinces have this rule which says, 'look, if you want to bill the public system, then you have to only bill the public system. If you want to opt out, opt out.'" Bacchus Barua, director of health policy studies at The Fraser Institute, said one problem with the CHA is that the conditions imposed are "remarkably vague," which create a risk-averse environment in terms of health-care policy. "Because of that risk aversion, a lot of provinces actually go beyond what's explicitly required by the CHA so that they don't accidentally get hit by by the federal government's interpretation of it," he said. "We don't see the sort of experimentation with policies that are proven elsewhere, to work in most other universal health-care systems." What happens if a province or territory violates the Act? As the CHA states, if hospitals and doctors charge fees for medically necessary services, then the federal government is supposed to deduct $1 from the province or territories' annual grant or CHT for every dollar assessed of the so-called extra billing. Has the federal government gone after provinces for violations? Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, responding to Singh's concerns about the enforcement of the CHA, said Monday that his government will continue to defend the Canada Health Act and can pull back money from provinces that violate it. "In the past, this government has pulled back money from provinces that haven't respected it. We will continue to do that." Federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he's worried more provinces will start using public money to fund procedures in private clinics and take resources from the public system. He's urging the federal government to utilize the Canada Health Act to halt the trend. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press) According to the 2020-2021 Canada Health Act Annual Report, for the most part, provincial and territorial health-care insurance plans met the requirements of the Canada Health Act. But there were some instances when the federal government said it had to withhold funds. A deduction of $4,521 was taken from the March 2021 CHT payments to Newfoundland and Labrador for charges at a private ophthalmological clinic. Both New Brunswick and Ontario were dinged around $65,000 and nearly $14,000 respectively for charges at private abortion clinics. The biggest violator, according to the report, was British Columbia, which submitted a financial statement of extra billing and user charges for fiscal year 2018–2019, in the amount of nearly $14 million. A deduction in the same amount was taken from British Columbia's March 2021 CHT payments. (The federal government has reimbursed the province in recognition for its Reimbursement Action Plan). The province has been the centre of a legal battle waged by private health-care advocate Dr. Brian Day, the owner of the Cambie Surgery Centre in Vancouver, who argues that patients should have a right to pay for services if wait times in the public system are too long. But Dr. Michael Rachlis, a public health physician and an adjunct professor at the University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, says that for the most part the federal government has not gone after provinces or territories for contravening the ban on extra billing for medically necessary services. "The way the act is enforced — it's not like there's federal inspectors," he said. "The provinces are asked to investigate themselves. There is no real enforcement mechanism." Rachlis says he also believes that there are lots of private clinics across Canada charging for medicare-covered services or up-selling services, citing a Globe and Mail 2017 investigation and work done by the Ontario Health Coalition. "And the feds aren't doing anything."
|
US probes complaints of parts Associated Press Detroit – The U.S. government's road safety agency is investigating complaints that windshield trim panels can fly off of Ford Explorers while they're traveling at highway speeds. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says it has 164 complaints about the trim pieces detaching on 2011 through 2019 Explorer SUVs. The probe covers about 1.86 million vehicles. The parts could hit the windshield of following vehicles or even a motorcycle rider, possibly causing loss of control and a crash, the agency said. The agency doesn't have any reports of crashes or injuries, according to a document posted Tuesday. NHTSA says it will determine how often the problem happens and the safety consequences of the trim pieces flying off the vehicles. The investigation could lead to a recall, but so far there hasn't been one. Ford says it’s working with NHTSA on the investigation. |
Congratulations to Retiree
|
Retiree Pat Brown Passes Away
April 26, 1942 - January 26, 2023It is with great sadness that we inform you of the passing of Pat Retired from Ford Bramalea on October 1, 2002 with Our deepest condolences go out to his family. Pat was a regular supporter of our union and attended many of
Funeral arrangements Are as follows: VisitationTurner & Porter - Peel Chapel
Thursday, 2 Feb 2023 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM
Thursday, 2 Feb 2023 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM
|
Ford recalls nearly 383K SUVs Associated Press Detroit – Ford is recalling nearly 383,000 SUVs in the U.S. because the touch screens may not display a camera image when backing up. The recall covers certain 2020 to 2023 Ford Explorers and Lincoln Aviators, and some 2020 to 2022 Lincoln Corsairs. All are equipped with 360-degree cameras. Ford says in government documents posted Friday that the video output can fail, preventing the rear camera image from being displayed. That can reduce rear visibility and increase the risk of a crash. The company says it has more than 2,000 warranty reports about the problem. It's aware of 17 minor crashes but no injuries. Many of the same vehicles were recalled for the same problem in 2021. Vehicles that were repaired previously will have to be fixed again. Dealers will update image processing software. Owners will be notified by letter starting Feb. 20.
|
Ford Firing Thousands Charlene Badasie The Ford Motor Company plans to cut 3,200 jobs across Europe. The decision comes as the carmaker relocates some aspects of product development to the United States. These restructuring plans are necessary as the automaker drops its high-selling, low-margin passenger vehicles like the Focus and Fiesta, and switches to SUVs and all-electric cars. While German operations would be impacted most, the U.K workforce will also be slashed. Ford wants to cut 2,500 jobs in product development along with 700 administrative roles. Workers at the Cologne site, which employs 14,000 people, were told about the retrenchments during a meeting earlier this week, CNN Business reports. Following the news, Germany's IG Metall union vowed to disrupt Ford operations across the continent if the job cuts go ahead. A spokesperson at the automaker’s Michigan headquarters said discussions with the German works councils were ongoing. He told Reuters the company needs to be more competitive as it transitions to electric vehicles. He did not elaborate on specific job plans. In a statement via Automotive News Europe, IG Metall said if negotiations between the works council and management in the coming weeks do not ensure the future of workers, they will join the process. "We will not hold back from measures that could seriously impact the company not just in Germany but Europe-wide," the union warned. The carmaker currently sells and services its vehicles in 50 markets, employing around 45,000 people. In 2022, Ford announced a $2 billion investment to expand production at its German plant to develop a mass-market all-electric model. The carmaker is planning seven new electric models in Europe. This includes a battery assembly site in Germany and a nickel cell manufacturing venture in Turkey. In partnership with Volkswagen, Ford will also produce 1.2 million vehicles over six years on the German carmaker’s MEB electric platform. While those plans remain firmly in place, the spokesperson added that its counterpart's role in its next generation of European electric vehicles is still to be decided. Despite plans to expand production in more areas, the job cuts aren't surprising. In June 2022, Ford said there would be significant job cuts at its factory in Spain and its plants in Germany. The company cited the shift to electric vehicle production which meant fewer labor hours would be required to assemble each unit. The latest batch of job cuts comes three years after its previous mass culling. In 2019, Ford did away with 12,000 jobs in Europe and reduced its manufacturing footprint in the region to 18 facilities. The company also stopped production at three Russian plants, closed an engine factory in Wales, and shuttered a transmission plant near France. Its U.K headquarters in Essex was closed and its British technical center in Dunton was consolidated. Additionally, Ford has been shrinking its passenger car lineup in Europe by scrapping models like Mondeo midsize car and S-Max minivans. Instead, the company is concentrating on sales of light commercial vehicles like the Transit van. According to Automotive News Europe, its 2022 passenger car market share was 4.4 % with sales of 510,000 units. |
Ford's BlueCruise automated Kalea Hall Ford Motor Co.'s BlueCruise active driving assistance (ADA) system has surpassed General Motors Co.'s SuperCruise and Tesla Inc.'s Autopilot to achieve the top spot in a Consumer Reports' study of 12 of the ADA systems released Wednesday. Consumer Reports tested the systems at its 327-acre Auto Test Center in Connecticut and on a 50-mile public roads loop between September and December 2022. Each system was rated in 40 tests, including steering the car, controlling the speed and keeping the driver safe. Automatic lane change and reacting for traffic lights were not evaluated. Ford's BlueCruise came out on top, followed by Super Cruise and Mercedes-Benz Driver Assistance. Former automated system leader Tesla fell from its second-place showing in CR's 2020 study to seventh. Jake Fisher, CR’s senior director of auto testing, said Tesla hasn’t changed the system's basic functionality since it was introduced while others have improved their adaptive cruise control (ACC) for speed control and lane centering assistance (LCA) for steering control. “After all this time, Autopilot still doesn’t allow collaborative steering and doesn’t have an effective driver monitoring system," Fisher said in the study. "While other automakers have evolved their ACC and LCA systems, Tesla has simply fallen behind.” Both BlueCruise (and Lincoln’s ActiveGlide) have direct driver monitoring systems (DDMS) requiring drivers to keep their eyes on the road. Infrared cameras are pointed at driver faces and alert the driver to pay attention. “Systems like BlueCruise are an important advancement that can help make driving easier and less stressful,” Fisher said. “But they don’t make a car self-driving at all. Instead, they create a new way of collaboratively driving with the computers in your car. When automakers do it the right way, it can make driving safer and more convenient. When they do it the wrong way, it can be dangerous.” BlueCruise was not evaluated in the 2020 CR study since Ford launched it with the Mustang Mach-E and F-150 pickup in 2021. BlueCruise has enrolled more than 120,000 customers and they've driven more than 42 million hands-free miles, Ford spokesperson Wes Sherwood said in a statement. "Customers value Ford BlueCruise and we are focused on making it even better, including launching BlueCruise 1.2 now with more refinements and features such as hands-free lane changing," Sherwood said. "Our driver monitoring camera system is an important technology that helps ensure customers remain in control of driving as we advance these technologies even further." GM debuted Super Cruise in 2017 and was recently expanded to work on more than 400,000 miles of mapped highways. "We believe this execution, along with our intentionally placed lightbar and notification system, meant to notify not distract, is in keeping with our guiding AV and ADAS philosophy of safe deployment," said Mario Maiorana, chief engineer of Super Cruise, in a statement. "We know our customers love Super Cruise, they’ve driven more than 50 million miles with the system engaged. The next evolution of our hands-free driving technology, Ultra Cruise, will ultimately provide destination-to-destination hands-free driving in 95 percent of driving scenarios, including nearly every paved road.” |
Ford to Pay $2500 If Story by Sebastian Blanco The SUV is still in high demand and short supply, so some who ordered a 2023 Bronco will get a different model from the one they wanted, if they get one at all.© Andi Hedrick - Car and Driver
First reported by Cars Direct, Ford has sent an incentive bulletin to dealers that offers anyone who's ordered a 2023 Bronco a $2500 discount if they switch to another Ford model. The 2023-Model Bronco Cancel Order & Purchase Replacement Offer says Ford is prepared to give "an additional incentive to cancel their current 23MY Bronco Order and retail order an eligible 23MY Ford vehicle," according to Cars Direct. Customers can get the discount if they make the switch to one of seven other Ford models before April 3. The qualifying list of non-Bronco vehicles includes the Escape, Bronco Sport, Edge, Explorer, Expedition, Ranger, and F-150. The Mustang Mach-E, F-150 Tremor, and Raptor apparently do not qualify. Ford told Car and Driver that the causes of the problems are, unsurprisingly, ongoing supply-chain challenges. The missing parts mean that certain "constrained features," like the Sasquatch and Lux packages and the Molded in Color Hard Top, are not going to be available for 2023 My Bronco customers who ordered them and have not yet received their vehicle. "Customers who remove constrained features are expected to receive a 2023 model year Bronco along with a $2500 rebate toward purchase or lease in addition to existing MSRP price protection they may have," Ford spokesperson Mike Levine told C/D. Customers who don't want to modify their reservation will have to accept one of four options. As mentioned, there's the $2500 rebate. Customers can also just cancel their reservation and get their original $100 deposit back. Third, they can try to find a "suitable Bronco" at a dealer that happens to have one. Finally, they can just cancel their order and place a new one for a 2024 Bronco. "If we are not able to schedule a reservation or order for production, it will be canceled for the 2023 model year and their $100 reservation deposit will be refunded automatically," Levine said. One problem with all of this is that no one can order a new Bronco at the moment. While the configurator remains active, Ford's consumer site also says, "Due to high demand, the current model year [2023 Bronco] is no longer available for retail order. Limited inventory may be available at selected dealers." There's also no way to order a 2024 Bronco through the site just yet. Ford's site also says,"[Bronco] supplies are limited and there are no guarantees." You don't say. |
Ontario government health line Health Connect Ontario is referring patients to virtual-only doctors, a service the province is trying to discourage. Toronto Star When the Ontario government reduced the fees paid to doctors for virtual-only appointments in December, it said the reason was to encourage family physicians to see patients in person as well as online. It’s a model of comprehensive care that many experts say is preferable to virtual-only. But the government’s own help line staffed by registered nurses — Health Connect Ontario — is referring patients they believe should see a doctor to those same virtual services. “Health Connect Ontario’s practice is to refer to OHIP-funded virtual care services where appropriate,” said the Ministry of Health in an email. However, the Star used the service and was told to seek medical help within four hours, not in person at an emergency department, but with Rocket Doctor, a chat-based medical service that charges $55 for a single live chat, which is not covered by OHIP. “It is deeply disturbing, and in contradiction to what (Premier) Doug Ford and (Health Minister) Sylvia Jones are saying, if our publicly funded services like Health Connect Ontario are referring people to pay to access services like corporatized for-profit virtual care providers,” said Liberal health critic Dr. Adil Shamji, the MPP for Don Valley East, in an interview. Health Connect Ontario was launched by the government in April and replaces Telehealth Ontario. The government says it’s “a free, secure and confidential service Ontarians can call or access online 24 hours a day, seven days a week to get health advice from a registered nurse or find health services or information.” The problem is that the virtual-only services that Health Connect Ontario is referring patients to are no longer covered by OHIP because most transitioned to a pay model after the pandemic waned and the Ontario government lowered the fees. As of December, the fees paid for virtual-only appointments with doctors, where there is no possibility of an in-person follow-up, were reduced to $20 for video appointments, and $15 for appointments by phone. In contrast, a family doctor that sees a patient in person as well as virtually by video can typically charge around $36 a visit and up. The fees were part of a Physician Services Agreement that enshrined fee codes for virtual services for the first time. The result of the fee change, though, was that almost all the virtual-only sites changed the way they delivered their services. Rocket Doctor and MD Connected stopped offering virtual appointments by video or phone and became chat-based medical services. Chat, or messaging, is not covered by OHIP, which means companies can charge patients for the uninsured service. A statement on MD Connected’s website says: “In response to these changes, MD Connected has been preparing a new model of service to continue to provide virtual health care to our patients. We believe in what we do for our communities and do not support the unsustainable fee cuts made by the Ontario government.” The company’s chat model launched this month. Many other companies are using loopholes to get around OHIP rules. Maple, partly owned by Loblaw, was always largely chat-based. It says it still takes OHIP for video appointments, but it’s the luck of the draw if a patient happens to get a doctor located in the province. If not, the patient can be charged. Others are using nurse practitioners online to deliver care. Nurse practitioners are not covered by OHIP, which means they can also charge for their services. One of the only virtual-only medical services left that takes OHIP, and has not transitioned to a pay model despite using chat to triage patients, is Cover Health. But the virtual-only service is fully booked days in advance and closes at 8. Ahmad Elkalza, its CEO, said the company hasn’t stopped taking OHIP patients because “there are tons of people that need it that can’t go to their family doctor or aren’t getting access that they need, whether it’s in rural areas or even urban areas or because the wait times are too long. “For Cover Health, our goal is to make sure that people get seen,” he told the Star. Elkalza says the company thought it would lose doctors after the fees were lowered but they have managed to keep staff and continue offering the service. They are using technology to streamline appointments for doctors so that they can see patients faster. The concern over virtual-only medicine is not just about the quality of care, but a fear that virtual-only doctors are referring too many patients to already clogged emergency departments because they can’t see a patient in person. Shamji said there’s evidence to show that both concerns are real. But having said that, he believes virtual care does have a role. “I’m glad that (virtual services) are funded as an insured benefit. It opens up access to care for people in rural and remote communities,” said Shamji. “It does play a role for individuals that don’t have access to a physician.” But he said it’s worrisome when virtual care is operating on a for-profit basis and going only to people who can afford it. “Those are the individuals that are the least likely to come from those marginalized, vulnerable, remote communities that stand to benefit the most from virtual primary care.” The Ministry of Health says if a patient feels they have been charged for an OHIP-insured service, they can contact the CFMA program at 1-888-662-6613 or by email at protectpublichealthcare@ontario.ca. “The Ministry of Health reviews all possible violations that come to its attention and ensures that all OHIP-insured patients who are charged for an insured service are reimbursed in full,” according to an email.
|
Profits put patients at risk It’s the staffing, not the physical facilities which Doug Ford worsens by capping wages so that staff will likely migrate to private clinics. By Rick Salutin Doug Ford said the answer to the health care crisis must be “bold, innovative and creative.” So he innovated, created and gave us — capitalism? And not the buccaneering, high risk, compete-till-you-triumph-or-die version. His is no-risk capitalism, paid for by the government’s stash of citizens’ taxes. When Ford says we’ll pay with our OHIP card, not our credit card, that’s the same way he’ll pay high-profit firms like the disastrous corporate long-term care facilities during COVID. The status quo is not acceptable so you replace it with the status quo? Capitalism has been in place since at least the 1700s, after it fought a spirited battle against feudalism and won. Do you know what it took to finally get public health care here in the 1960s? Doctors went on strike in Saskatchewan against Tommy Douglas’ plan. The government flew in MDs and nurses from the U.K. By mid-decade, most docs realized they were doing rather well and cheerily caved. Look, expanding clinics that do cataracts or MRIs — 98 per cent of which are private, for-profit, including those corporate gargantuans in long-term care — will do nothing for the true crisis, which is about staffing ERs and hospitals, not eye care. In fact, it will intensify and worsen that genuine crisis. We’ll end up with a society in which some get their cataracts fixed — a good thing — but others go into crisis while in the waiting room and then die still being evaluated, as recently happened in Nova Scotia. They’re now adding care providers to waiting rooms there. It’s the staffing, stupid, not the physical facilities. Which Ford worsens by capping wages so that staff will likely migrate to private clinics where wages aren’t capped and work conditions don’t include knowing that people may be dying while waiting for treatment. We already have a highly mixed system. Family docs are private, running their businesses, or pharmacies. We aren’t Cuba or North Korea, despite Ford’s lusty witticism about that. They’re paid by the state but retain their autonomy, as patients retain the ability to choose. That’s why it’s called mixed, contra a Globe editorial’s ignorant claim about the “blind fear of private delivery” here. To be honest, which columnists should be, I don’t really see the point of big profits in health care. I speak practically, not moralistically. Current business models like “just in time” delivery make no sense in medicine and are potentially criminal. It’s one thing to delay delivery of, say, decals, due to supply chain screw-ups and another to have patients die owing to staff or supply shortages. For-profit health care also leads to more “upselling” and extra-billing. Have you ever had a funeral director contemptuously fling a brochure at you describing government-mandated low-cost caskets that he must offer, and then glide unctuously toward the deluxe coffins in his showroom? The pressure is on for that kind of thing whenever profits are involved. Above all, if you must siphon resources to reward shareholders with profits, patients will suffer or die as a result — if not at those institutions, then among the public generally. I suppose I’m missing something subtle here but we did see lots of unnecessary carnage at highly profitable LTCs during COVID. The Star noted that, “of the 20 worst-hit homes in Ontario’s second wave, 17 are for-profit.” Then, as Bob Hepburn wrote here, Ford “gave out new 30-year licences to private operators that will result in 18,000 more beds” in LTCs. If not for those death rates, we’d have had a fairly decent record during COVID. The profit motive has the ability to ruin almost anything it touches, though it doesn’t always matter much outside medical contexts. Take “Will Trent,” the new U.S. network show about a dyslexic, damaged cop in Georgia. Good premise, fine cast, sharp scripts. But, due to lavish time allotments for ads, episodes must be 40 minutes versus 60 or more and it feels shallow and rushed. Could have been a “Luther” or “Perry Mason,” but it isn’t. Happily, real lives weren’t at stake.
|
GM appealing to Supreme Kalea Hall General Motors Co. is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review its racketeering lawsuit against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, now known as Stellantis NV, according to a filing this month with the high court. GM in August lost its appeal in the case in August when the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a federal judge's decision to throw out the lawsuit originally filed in 2019. "We are seeking Supreme Court review of the Sixth Circuit’s decision that would allow FCA to escape liability under the federal racketeering statute for the harm it inflicted on GM through its admitted corruption," GM spokesperson Maria Raynal said in a statement. GM sued its crosstown rival alleging FCA's late CEO Sergio Marchionne orchestrated a multimillion-dollar racketeering conspiracy that used bribes to corrupt three rounds of bargaining with the United Auto Workers in order to harm GM. The Detroit automaker has said it lost "billions" as a result of the bribery conspiracy to make GM's labor costs high during negotiations with the UAW. In its filing to the Supreme Court, the Detroit automaker contends FCA "directly harmed GM, both by ensuring that GM would consistently be denied concessions the UAW gave to FCA, and by corrupting the pattern-bargaining process to force GM to shoulder more than $1 billion in labor costs above what it would have expended absent FCA’s racketeering. It also became increasingly apparent that imposing these massive costs on GM was no accident or unintended byproduct, but rather was an intended goal of FCA’s scheme to use bribery and corruption to injure a rival and strong-arm GM into a merger." FCA/Stellantis has denied GM's claims. Lawyers for the automaker asked the justices for an extension to reply to GM's petition into March, citing "the press of other matters." That request was granted. In a statement, Stellantis spokesperson Shawn Morgan said: "As we have said from the date this lawsuit was filed, it is meritless and we will continue to defend ourselves vigorously and pursue all available remedies in response to this groundless lawsuit.” |
Virginia governor scraps Ford's Jordyn Grzelewski A Ford Motor Co. battery plant investment sought by Michigan and Virginia that would have created roughly 2,500 jobs was rejected by Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a potential Republican candidate for president, over his objections to the involvement of a Chinese partner. “While Ford is an iconic American company, it became clear that this proposal would serve as a front for the Chinese Communist party, which could compromise our economic security and Virginians’ personal privacy," Youngkin spokesperson Macaulay Porter said in a statement to The Detroit News. “Virginians can be confident that companies with known ties to the Chinese Communist Party won’t receive a leg up from the Commonwealth’s economic incentive packages," she added. "When the potentially damaging effects of the deal were realized, the plant proposal never reached a final discussion stage.” If the project had moved forward in Virginia, it would have delivered another blow to the Dearborn automaker's home state of Michigan. Ford sent shockwaves through the Lansing political class and business leaders when it confirmed plans in September 2021 to invest more than $11 billion in EV and battery production in Tennessee and Kentucky amid a growing tide of auto investment in the south and southeast. But that appears to be off the table after Youngkin rejected the project in December, a decision that potentially cost one of the poorest parts of Virginia at least 2,500 jobs. The project would have been built on the Southern Virginia Mega Site at Berry Hill in Pittsylvania County, in the Southside region of south-central Virginia, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported. The Times-Dispatch reported that the plant would have produced lithium iron phosphate batteries for Ford's EVs. Ford in July unveiled key aspects of its strategy for sourcing raw materials for batteries, including the addition of LFP battery cells to its portfolio — a move that would help the Dearborn automaker reduce its reliance on such battery minerals as nickel and cobalt. Still, Michigan remains among the finalists vying for the joint-venture operation, according to two sources familiar with the situation. Sites in Marshall, Grand Ledge near Lansing, and Mundy Township in Genesee County are considered sufficiently large to accommodate a plant to build batteries for Ford's next-generation electric vehicles. Ford's battery plant project involves Chinese battery maker Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., or CATL, already a battery supplier to the Blue Oval. The automaker previously said CATL would supply full LFP battery packs for the electric Mustang Mach-E in North America starting this year, and for the Ford F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck starting in 2024. But in addition to locking up agreements with suppliers, localizing battery cell production through joint ventures also has been key to Ford's strategy to shoring up its EV supply chain as it aims to produce 600,000 electric vehicles globally by the end of this year and 2 million globally by 2026. Construction is underway, for example, on three battery plants Ford is building with JV partner SK On — two in Kentucky, one in Tennessee — as part of the automaker's largest-ever manufacturing investment. In July, when Ford revealed some of its sourcing strategies for EV components and raw materials, the company said it planned to add 40 gigawatt hours of LFP battery capacity in North America starting in 2026. At the time, executives declined to comment further on that plan. Youngkin, the Virginia governor eyeing a 2024 run for president, halted the Ford plan to build a battery plant in Virginia in December because it involved a partnership with CATL, according to the Times-Dispatch. The newspaper said he first publicly discussed this decision last week following his State of the Commonwealth address on Wednesday. Local officials in Pittsylvania County declined comment to the Times-Dispatch because they had signed nondisclosure agreements, but Democratic state lawmakers blasted Youngkin over the potential lost jobs. "The governor's decision to to pull Virginia out of the competition for the new Ford facility puts the Commonwealth at a severe disadvantage," state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi, D-Chesterfield, wrote the Times-Dispatch in an email. The News reached out to the Michigan Economic Development Corp., but CEO Quentin Messer Jr. was not immediately available to comment because he's accompanying Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and her delegation on a trade mission to Norway and Switzerland. The governor is scheduled to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos later this week. |
Ontario License Plate Renewal: January 18, 2023 Ontario drivers no longer need to pay to renew their licence plates with an annual sticker, though your plates still need to be renewed – or you could be fined heavily. Below, we’ll cover everything you need to know about renewing your licence plate in Ontario in 2022-23. Do I need to renew my licence plate sticker in Ontario? Yes, except there’s no longer a sticker (or a fee) involved. According to the Ontario Government, your vehicle must have a valid licence plate and be insured to drive legally in this province. Most drivers are used to renewing their licence plates by applying a new sticker every 1 to 2 years. Part of renewing your licence plate involves connecting your insurance coverage to the plated vehicle. To renew your licence plate, you need to provide your insurance company your name and policy number. This information is tied to your vehicle’s licence plate, and helps law enforcement to quickly verify that a vehicle has valid insurance coverage. This is still a requirement in Ontario today, though the annual or bi-annual licence plate sticker has been eliminated, and the renewal fees have been scrapped. How do I renew my Ontario licence plate sticker? Renewing your licence plate can be done online in about 2 minutes by visiting the Ontario license renewal website here. Ensure all outstanding tickets, tolls, and other fees are paid before renewing Before renewing, you’ll also have to pay any defaulted fines, tolls or fees that may be applicable. Once you’ve updated your licence plates online, law enforcement databases are updated instantly so police will be aware immediately once your plate is renewed. Remember: if you’re renewing the plate on a passenger vehicle, light-duty truck, motorcycle or moped, there’s no fee and no sticker involved – just a 2-minute visit to a quick and easy web interface. Plates can be renewed up to 180 days before they expire, typically on your birthday. Can I renew my Ontario license plate sticker online & is there an HST charge? Yes, and you should. The process is simple, fast and easy, and you don’t even have to leave your house. This saves you time and money and basically makes you a genius. Just visit the Ontario licence renewal page (we linked to it above) with proper documentation in hand, and you’ll have a confirmation email in a matter of minutes. If you’d prefer to renew your licence plate in person, you’ll need to visit a Service Ontario location. You can search for a location near you, as well as its hours of operation, here at the ServiceOntario page. Is there HST on licence plate renewal in Ontario? No. Since there are no fees to renew your licence plate in Ontario, there’s no HST applicable. Did you get a refund for your past licence plate sticker fees? In the spring of 2022, many Ontario drivers got a refund cheque in the mail, reimbursing them for a portion of the fees they paid for their last licence plate sticker the last time they renewed it. The sticker program (and associated fees) were cancelled as of March 13, 2022, saving drivers between $60 and $120 per year. There are exceptions, however. Certain types of vehicles will still have to pay a fee when renewing their plates, and don’t qualify for a refund. These vehicles include trailers, snowmobiles, buses and commercial vehicles. Ontario licence plates vs. driver’s licence Remember that the cancellation of fees and stickers applies to licence plates in Ontario, not driver’s licences. An Ontario driver’s licence is good for 5 years, after which time you’ll need to pay a $90 fee to renew it for 5 more years. Automatic Licence Plate Recognition (ALPR) According to the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), ALPR is a traffic safety enforcement program that allows for the detection of drivers who are driving illegally on Ontario roads. With the ability to scan thousands of plates per hour, the system compares passing licence plate numbers with a ‘hot list’ data file that contains millions of licence plate numbers in poor standing. Used to track down drivers with suspended licences, stolen vehicles or outstanding warrants, the ALPR program can also detect expired plates. Can I be fined if I don’t renew my plate? Driving with an invalid (expired) driver’s licence can carry a fine of $260 and void your insurance coverage. Driving without a validated licence plate can carry a fine of up to $1,000. Ensure your vehicle licence plate is visible Remember: your rear licence plate needs to be visible clearly at all times, which is why your vehicle has special lighting designed to illuminate your plate at night. Be sure this lighting is in proper working order from time to time, replacing bulbs as necessary. If a police officer isn’t able to read your plate, you may be fined. Before installing any licence plate cover, protector or frame, be sure to check that it doesn’t impede or block any portion of the plate (or its displayed text) for the same reason. |
Former union leaders VANMALA SUBRAMANIAM The Ontario Public Service Employees Union is accusing three former executives, including ex-leader Warren (Smokey) Thomas, of improperly using millions of dollars in cash and assets for personal enrichment. The accusations are part of a lawsuit filed by OPSEU in a Toronto court on Monday morning. The union alleges that Mr. Thomas, who served as president of OPSEU for 15 years before retiring from the union last April, along with Eduardo Almeida, the former Vice-President and Treasurer of OPSEU paid themselves “significant compensation” they were not entitled to, and transferred union-owned assets such as vehicles to themselves and family members for free. The suit accuses both men of paying out cash from the union’s strike fund to themselves and a third union executive, Maurice Gabay, and entering into “agreements,” which ultimately enriched themselves at the union’s expense. The civil claim was filed after an investigation and audit conducted by OPSEU’s new leadership team, headed by president JP Hornick, who was elected last spring. Part of her platform was to ensure more transparency and financial accountability at the union, which represents more than 180,000 full-time and part-time public sector workers in Ontario. The lawsuit states that Mr. Thomas, Mr. Almeida and Mr. Gabay owe the union almost $6-million in funds that they allegedly took. The union is seeking an additional $6-million in damages. Mr. Thomas and Mr. Almeida could not be reached for comment. Mr. Gabay did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Members of OPSEU’s executive board first became concerned about Mr. Thomas and Mr. Almeida’s conduct when they failed to adequately disclose and account for large expenditures incurred by the union. At a December 2021 meeting, the board discussed conducting a forensic audit of the union’s finances. By this point, Mr. Thomas had announced he was going to retire from the union and would not run for re-election. The union proceeded to hire a third-party forensic accountant to proceed with the audit. But in February 2022, according to the lawsuit, the defendants (the lawsuit did not specifically name whom), attempted to delay the audit until after the April 2022 election for new leadership. In a statement released Monday, Ms. Hornick said the union engaged the third-party forensic accountant to get a “full picture of exactly what happened”. “I want to assure you that despite today’s news, our union remains strong and our finances stable. We will continue to act and work collaboratively with the appropriate authorities,” she added. The union’s investigation into its finances is still ongoing. Mr. Thomas, a former nurse, was widely seen by the labour movement as a respected and formidable union leader, serving as OPSEU’s president for seven terms between April 2007 and April 2022. Mr. Almeida was treasurer of the union for 11 years, and was responsible for accounting for all the union’s finances, in addition to identifying any shortcomings in compliance related to approval of expenses. Mr. Gabay was employed by OPSEU as an accountant with the union’s financial services division. In 2015, he was promoted to Administrator at the financial services division but his position was then terminated in April 2022. Mr. Gabay reported to Mr. Almeida. Mr. Thomas, who received a salary of over $140,000, obtained a severance payment of $60,000 upon his retirement. Mr. Almeida was paid more than $130,000 annually and did not receive any severance, while Mr. Gabay received approximately $118,000 upon his termination. The lawsuit suggests that all three men misappropriated funds throughout their respective tenures at the union. Part of the alleged misappropriation of funds involved the way in which the defendants paid themselves for vacation days, days “in lieu” of working on weekends, and home office allowances. For example, the lawsuit accuses Mr. Thomas of paying himself almost $400,000 for “lieu days” that they claim he was not entitled to. Both Mr. Thomas and Mr. Almeida also allegedly gave themselves signing bonuses of close to $10,000 in 2017, of which the union claims was illegitimate. “Mr. Thomas and Mr. Almeida know or ought to have known that they were not entitled to these amounts, but abused their power and authority and breached their duties to the union by causing it to make these payments to them for their own benefit,” the lawsuit states, adding that Mr. Gabay colluded with them to authorize the payments. Another example mentioned in the lawsuit of the way in which union funds were improperly used was through the use of a union-issued credit card — Mr. Almeida allegedly incurred credit card charges amounting to more than $1.3-million, charges that the union was not able to account for. Mr. Thomas also allegedly transferred a number of vehicles purchased by the union to himself and his wife. In July 2019, he transferred ownership of a Dodge Grand Caravan worth $35,000 to his spouse, and two years prior he had transferred another vehicle, a Dodge Durango worth $65,000 to her as well. He also allegedly transferred a car to his son in 2015. None of these transfers were authorized by the union’s executive board. The former union executives also allegedly stole money from the union’s strike fund, which is used to compensate workers while they go on strike. Between 2014 and 2020, the three defendants withdrew $670,000 in cash from the strike fund. None of these withdrawals were authorized by the executive board, the lawsuit claims. In some of the years that the withdrawals were made, there were no strikes or lockouts by any of OPSEU’s members or locals. Union money was also allegedly used by Mr. Thomas and Mr. Almeida in settling agreements between the union and themselves. For example, in March 2022, an agreement was struck between OPSEU and Mr. Thomas to settle a harassment and discrimination complaint made by him against certain members of OPSEU’s executive board. Mr. Thomas was paid $500,000 and given a vehicle. Allegations against Mr. Thomas, Mr. Almeida and Mr. Gabay come almost a year after former Unifor president Jerry Dias — another popular and well-respected labour leader — allegedly received a $25,000 bribe. Charges made against Mr. Dias by Unifor have yet to be heard, but a police investigation of potential criminal conduct against him was recently dropped.
|
In arguably biggest test of Dispute over content requirements seen as a litmus test of new trade pact Alexander Panetta Canada, Mexico and auto companies have been declared the winners in arguably the most important trade dispute under the new NAFTA, landing the U.S. on the losing side in a case about calculating the origin of auto parts. The long-expected decision was known for weeks to the parties involved, yet it was withheld from public release until after North American leaders appeared together at a summit this week in Mexico. It involves small print with big consequences for the industry at the heart of the continental trade agreement: Automobiles. At its core, the dispute was about how hard to push car companies to use parts from North America, at a time when countries are seeking to pry back manufacturing jobs. The specific case involved two conflicting methodologies for calculating the origins of a car's parts: One stricter, one easier. Americans took a hard line. The U.S. wanted the toughest interpretation of the rules, which would force cars to include more North American parts to avoid a tariff. Mexico fired off a suit against the U.S., calling its method damaging, costly to companies and counterproductive to the continent's car industry. Canada joined the suit. Car companies eagerly supported the suit. And the complainants ultimately won. Mexico argued automakers don't need to be brow-beaten when they're already investing massively in the North American sector, like at this GM plant in Ingersoll, Ont. Critics also suggested the stricter U.S. rules would actually do more harm than good. (Carlos Osorio/Reuters) Canada, Mexico and the auto industry are now celebrating the ruling from a five-member international panel. In a decision declared Dec. 14, but only released Wednesday, the panel said that the United States breached the new Canada-U.S.-Mexico agreement (CUSMA) when it tried imposing new rules. The ruling pointed to a piece of evidence submitted by Canada: an email sent by a U.S. official that supported the complainants' claim that all three countries originally understood they were agreeing to the simpler formula. "Today's decision is a good decision for the industry," International Trade Minister Mary Ng told reporters in Mexico City. "It's what we negotiated.… Clarity in the rules — it's what today's decision provides." It's the second win for Canada under the new trade agreement; Canada also won a case on solar panels, though it was the main loser in a dairy dispute with the U.S. Mexico and Canada have won a trade dispute with the United States over rules of origin for auto parts, which could help protect Canadian businesses and jobs. The verdict comes as little surprise. The countries have been aware of it for weeks and, while it was still officially confidential, a Mexican cabinet minister blurted it out to a newspaper there late last year. The trade community is now awaiting U.S. reaction, with its eagerly anticipated response being seen as an early litmus test of the reliability of the CUSMA dispute system. Early reaction was vague from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR): It did not spell out its next move, but called the decision disappointing. "[This] could result in less North American content in automobiles, less investment across the region and fewer American jobs," said the U.S. statement. "We are reviewing the report and considering next steps. We will engage Mexico and Canada on a possible resolution." Background of the case The dispute stemmed from the aftermath of the new NAFTA, originally reached in 2018 under the Trump administration. The new trade pact requires more parts from North America to avoid a tariff, part of Trump's protectionist push for more domestic manufacturing. Yet the U.S. stunned its partners and the car companies after the deal was already signed: It insisted upon an unexpectedly strict interpretation of the terms. Imagine a car part qualifies as North American because 85 per cent of its sub-components come from this continent. Under the pact, that part faces no tariff. But then there's a subsequent, bigger calculation for the entire car: Does the vehicle, as a whole, have enough North American content to avoid a tariff? Donald Trump's trade czar, Robert Lighthizer, seen here in 2020, made it his mission to reshore U.S. manufacturing jobs. It was his main goal in negotiating the new NAFTA. But other countries say the U.S. pulled a fast one, after the deal was already signed. (Anna Moneymaker/Reuters) In making that calculation, when adding up parts of the car, how much does that smaller piece counts toward the car's total amount of North American content? The U.S. argued it should be 85 per cent. Others insisted on the so-called roll-up method: if that piece is deemed North American, then it should count fully as 100 per cent North American. They say they were caught off-guard when, long after the deal was signed, the U.S. suddenly insisted on its tougher formula. Mexico's suit complained that this was not part of the agreement and represented an absurdly complicated regulatory burden. It said car companies don't need to be brow-beaten into building cars here when they've already invested massively in recent years in new North American production: "This development is particularly nonsensical [now]." Canada: U.S. was trying to sneak in changes Canada's submission includes correspondence as evidence that the parties were stunned when the U.S. presented this new formula in 2020, after the pact had already taken effect. "This reinterpretation came as a surprise to Canada, Mexico and the entire automotive industry," said the Canadian submission. The Canadian submission also implies the Americans may have been sneakily, belatedly, trying to tilt the deal in their favour. It argues that making trade more complicated benefits manufacturing in the country with the largest domestic market. If it becomes more difficult to ship across borders, the Canadian suit argues, that's an incentive for companies to simply produce in the market with the most customers: in this case, the U.S. The Americans argued that their formula would help North America's workers versus those overseas. The U.S. submission said the stricter formula would result in significantly more North American content per car — anywhere between eight and 33 per cent. It said the other countries' looser formula means billions of dollars in lost manufacturing opportunities each year on this continent. Group blasts Canada, Mexico case as anti-worker One American-based group that promotes domestic manufacturing expressed frustration that Mexico and Canada launched this case. Charles Benoit, a Canadian-born trade lawyer with the group Coalition for a Prosperous America, said those two countries sided with multinational companies over workers here. "It's disappointing," Benoit said. "Mexico and Canada's trade ministries didn't stop to think about their own supply-chain producers and workers before bringing this case on behalf of global automakers." He voiced concern that this means more imports from abroad, including from China, undermining efforts to revive manufacturing. But it's complicated. Industry players warn that making compliance more expensive holds unwanted negative consequences. They say more onerous rules would just force car companies to produce offshore to remain cost-competitive. At some point, manufacturers would conclude it's cheaper to bring parts from overseas and pay the tariff, said Flavio Volpe, head of AMPA, Canada's auto-parts lobby group. The tariff rate for cars is 2.5 per cent in the U.S. and 6.1 per cent in Canada. The new pact is already a massive win for this continent's parts manufacturers, said Volpe, as evidenced by the investment spree now happening in North American plants. The U.S.-imposed requirements could have undermined this, he said, noting the panel's verdict is good for North America. "It's a win for the automotive parts sector in all three countries. And also provides a win for stability in the new USMCA," Volpe said. "Instead of saying, 'Hey, two years into the USMCA, we have the U.S. reinterpreting it and changing the deal.'" |
Odometer Rollback Is On The Rise Patrick Olsen Protecting Yourself From Odometer Fraud Consumers may think that odometers in the digital age are less of a target for fraud – but they’d be wrong. For cheaters, it’s never been easier – or cheaper – to remove thousands of miles from a car’s history in one fell swoop. Carfax research indicates that more than 1.9 million vehicles on the road have rolled-back odometers, a 7% increase from the previous year. Look here to see if odometer rollback was reported to CARFAX for a car, making it potentially unsafe. All DMVs require permanent title marks for vehicles that have had their odometers falsely changed and rolled back. Just enter a VIN below to find out.* Whether you have an older vehicle with a mechanical odometer or a newer car with a digital odometer, the threat of false odometer readings remains. “Many people think odometer fraud disappeared with the invention of digital odometers,” said Emilie Voss, Public Relations Director for CARFAX. “But that couldn’t be further from the truth. We’re still seeing the number of vehicles on the road with a rolled-back odometer rise year-over-year.” These are the 10 states nationwide with the most vehicles with rolled-back odometers, all of which saw increases: The Financial Cost to the Buyer All things being equal, a higher mileage vehicle typically commands a lower price on the used market, and once the true odometer reading becomes known, your car’s value is reduced. According to Carfax data, consumers lose an average of $4,000 in value from unknowingly buying a car with a rolled-back odometer, and that doesn’t include unexpected maintenance costs. There are routine maintenance items you might have thought were months or years away, but which now require immediate attention. Specifically, if you compare the actual odometer reading with the maintenance schedule in the owner’s manual, you may discover that something like the shocks or struts have been due for a replacement for some time now. Even a small adjustment of a few thousand miles will affect values. However, most odometer tampering incidents involve tens of thousands of miles. That means the 7-year-old sedan showing 40,000 miles on the odometer might actually have 90,000 miles or more. Discovering a rolled-back odometer can have other repercussions. If you financed your vehicle, you will have to tell the finance company what the correct mileage is, and that true number could mean an increase in your interest rate. Your insurance company might raise your premium based on that same info. Policies are based on a number of factors, including a vehicle’s body style, make, model, model year, condition and mileage. In a worst-case scenario, your insurance might be canceled. Resolving an odometer rollback fraud case takes time and money, and you may need an attorney to represent you. How to Protect Yourself Against Odometer Fraud “It takes con artists a matter of minutes to wipe thousands and thousands of miles off a vehicle’s odometer,” said Voss, “and unfortunately these swindlers likely see this unprecedented used car market as a way to make a quick buck.” The good news is that odometer rollback fraud can almost always be avoided. It starts by examining the vehicle yourself and asking the seller some questions related to the condition of the car. These include questions about its odometer reading. If the deal seems too good to be true, then chances are your instincts are correct. If the seller puts undue pressure on you, that’s a warning sign too. Take the car to your mechanic to verify its condition. A trained mechanic will notice things you won’t – and has vantage points to check the car that you don’t – and may question why certain parts or components show advanced signs of wear that do not correspond to the vehicle’s mileage. For example, if the car’s spark plugs and wires should last 100,000 miles but look like they are due for replacement when the odometer reads 40,000 miles, that’s a problem. Even before contacting a mechanic, ask the seller to show you the Carfax Vehicle History Report. You can also find out if odometer fraud has been reported by using the free Odometer Check tool at the top of this page. Enter the car’s 17-digit vehicle identification number (VIN) and your Zip code. You’ll get an alert if odometer fraud is suspected. |
Ford F-Series claims 'best-selling Jordyn Grzelewski Ahead of the release of full-year sales results for the automotive industry later this week, Ford Motor Co. on Tuesday said that its flagship F-Series pickup truck lineup retained its titles as the best-selling truck and best-selling vehicle in the U.S. The Dearborn automaker said in a news release that F-Series sales surpassed 640,000 trucks in 2022. The results make it the best-selling vehicle for 41 years and the best-selling truck for 46 years running. Sales were down from 2021, when F-Series notched more than 726,000 sales. Additionally, Ford spokesperson Mike Levine said that December is slated to pan out as the best month of the year for F-Series sales on improved inventory flow and strong demand. The company reports monthly results on Thursday. Crosstown rival General Motors Co. along with numerous other automakers, is scheduled to release fourth-quarter results Wednesday. Results will show how competitors such as the Chevy Silverado and Stellantis NV's Ram trucks fared in 2022. “The Ford truck team’s ability to anticipate customer needs, continuously innovate, and provide best-in-class levels of capability and performance has helped make F-Series the sales leader time and time again,” Kumar Galhotra, president of Ford Blue, said in a statement. “We’re honored and humbled that our customers have helped us achieve this milestone for more than four decades.” F-Series includes a wide range of products, such as the F-150, the Super Duty and the F-550 chassis cab. It also includes numerous powertrains — notably adding the battery-electric F-150 Lightning earlier this year. Ford has been selling about 2,000 units of the Lightning per month as it ramps up to producing 150,000 units annually this year. Through November, the Blue Oval had sold 13,258 Lightings — helping Ford claim the title of No. 2 EV maker in the U.S. The F-Series results also were buoyed by strong demand for the Super Duty, which was redesigned for model year 2023 and had generated more than 150,000 total orders through November after the order bank opened in October. Deliveries of those trucks start early this year, Ford said. F-Series marks its 75th anniversary this year. |
As 'Three Amigos' By James McCarten, WASHINGTON — From the frosty throes of a Canadian winter, the land of conquistadors and Frida Kahlo can seem a million miles away. But that’s not the way North American diplomats, trade experts and business leaders see it — and they hope the continent’s leaders have a similar vision as the so-called “Three Amigos” gather this week in Mexico City. “The potential for North America is immense,” said Eric Farnsworth, the former Clinton-era White House official who now leads the D.C. office of the Council of the Americas and the Americas Society. Farnsworth said a continental perspective will be vital to make substantive progress on issues like fortified supply chains, mitigating China’s influence and building a 21st-century workforce in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. “It’s our hope that the leaders, when they get together to talk about some of these issues, keep in mind the fundamental vision of what North America really could be,” he told a panel discussion Friday. “We can’t do these things without our partners in Canada and Mexico; it’s just fundamental to our own well-being. And so that has to be the underlying message of the leaders as they get together.” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau arrives later Monday in Mexico City, where he’ll take part in an afternoon discussion with business leaders from across the continent before the summit gets underway in earnest Tuesday. While Trudeau is airborne, Joe Biden — fresh from his first presidential visit to the politically fraught southern border — will sit down for a bilateral meeting with Mexican counterpart Andrés Manuel López Obrador. A tête-à-tête between just the Canadian and U.S. leaders is scheduled to take place Tuesday morning. “It’s a trilateral meeting, a trilateral summit, but there are lots of bilateral items that are discussed at those meetings as well,” said Gary Doer, who served as Canada’s ambassador to the U.S. from 2009 to 2016. Then-prime minister Stephen Harper got plenty of one-on-one face time with U.S. counterpart Barack Obama the last time the summit took place in Mexico in 2014, Doer recalled. With Canadian and Mexican manufacturers added in the 11th hour to Biden’s plan to encourage the sale of climate-friendly electric vehicles, there will be room to talk about more familiar irritants like trade disputes and U.S. protectionism. On those fronts, there is no shortage of talking points. The U.S. argues that Canada’s supply-managed dairy market denies American producers fair access to customers north of the border. The U.S. also says Mexico is unfairly favouring domestic energy suppliers. And both Mexico and Canada say the U.S. isn’t playing fair when it comes to how it defines foreign content in its automotive supply chains. Mexico is also under pressure to come to terms with the U.S. on López Obrador’s plan to ban imports of genetically modified corn and the herbicide glyphosate, a decree that has angered American farmers Then there’s Buy American, the long-standing, politically popular U.S. doctrine of preferring domestic suppliers over those of even the most neighbourly allies. Canada may have averted catastrophe when Biden’s electric-vehicle tax credits were amended last year to include North American manufacturers, but the president still rarely misses a chance to tout made-in-America supply chains. And the green-energy incentives now in place in the U.S. still pose challenges for Canada, said Louise Blais, a retired Canadian diplomat who served as ambassador to the UN and consul general in Atlanta. “I’m expecting both the Mexican president and the Canadian prime minister to raise this issue with the president to say, ‘Look, we need to have a more continental approach to some of these policies,'” said Blais. “It’s in the interest of the United States, at the end of the day, to get those pieces of legislation right so that they really do boost prosperity across the United States.” As a country that’s not immune to the influences of irregular migration and the flow of fentanyl at the U.S.-Mexico border, Canada will need to be part of that conversation as well, one that’s widely expected to dominate the agenda. U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported nearly 2.4 million expulsions and apprehensions at or near the southern border in the last fiscal year, a 37 per cent increase over the previous fiscal period. Anecdotal evidence suggests a post-pandemic increase in irregular migration in both directions at the northern border as well. Biden’s Sunday visit to the southern border followed a fresh crackdown on illegal migrants from Cuba, Haiti and Nicaragua, on top of existing restrictions against Venezuelan migrants. At the same time, the U.S. plans to welcome 30,000 new immigrants a month from all four countries over the next two years, provided they are eligible to work and enter the country legally. Brian Nichols, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs, made clear in a Wilson Center panel discussion Friday that his country’s unique ties to Canada won’t be lost in Mexico. The last North American gathering at the White House in 2021 produced a list of more than 40 different “deliverables,” Nichols said — a huge number by most standards, but not surprising for three countries that share borders. “That’s a family conversation in a way that often you’re not having with other nations,” he said. “The goodwill to advance our shared future in those conversations is something that really comes across.” Canada, however, often doesn’t want to be lumped in with Mexico when it comes to its relations with the U.S., said Scotty Greenwood, chief executive of the Canadian American Business Council. “It wants to have its own unique relationship with the U.S., so we’ll see if Canada is going to embrace or resist the ‘North American idea.’ Greenwood said. “Meaning, ‘Let’s view things as a bloc and as a region, and let’s take things on together.’ I hope it embraces it. But that would be different.” Biden also has yet to visit Canada in person since taking office — a long-standing bilateral tradition that typically comes shortly after a presidential inauguration, but which was short-circuited in 2021 by the pandemic. This week’s meetings could provide fresh clarity on when Biden’s long-promised trip north — confirmed over the summer, but interrupted again when the president himself tested positive — might finally take place. |
Ford closes 2022 as No. 2
Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales slipped 2.2% year-over-year in 2022, amid the auto industry's worst sales showing in a decade. The Dearborn automaker reported 1,864,464 sales for the year, down from 1,905,955 in 2021. For December, Ford's sales of 179,279 vehicles were up 3.2% year-over-year. Meanwhile, Ford's market share inched up 0.7 percentage points last year, buoyed by its growing electric-vehicle sales. Ford sold 61,575 EVs in the U.S. last year, up 126% for the year. The automaker is in second place in EV sales behind market leader Tesla Inc. and aims to boost annual EV production capacity to 600,000 units globally by the end of this year. “Delivering on our strategy, share expansion came from broad-based growth from our SUV lineup and our all-new EVs growing at twice the rate of the overall EV segment," Andrew Frick, vice president of sales, distribution and trucks for Ford Blue, said in a statement. "With a strong retail order bank, Ford is well positioned heading into 2023.” Ford has three EVs on the market: the F-150 Lightning pickup, which closed the year as the best-selling electric truck in the U.S. with 15,617 sales since it launched in May; the E-Transit van, which had 73% share of the electric van segment to end the year, with 6,500 sales; and the Mustang Mach-E crossover SUV, which saw sales increase 45.4% year-over-year on sales of 39,458 units. Industrywide, sales were down to their lowest level in a decade amid nagging supply constraints and signs that demand is beginning to soften as rising interest rates make new vehicles less affordable for consumers already dealing with high inflation. Cox Automotive reported Wednesday that industry sales were slated to fall 8% year-over-year, to just under 14 million units. In a blog post, the industry data provider said that 2022 "will be recorded as a year that began with inventory challenges and ended with demand issues. In a down market, Ford and General Motors, the big players in Detroit, delivered relatively strong numbers, as their inventory levels improved, and they gained back share lost in 2021." Analysts expect sales to rise modestly this year, with auto information website Edmunds.com, Inc. forecasting sales of 14.8 million units — higher than 2022, but still well below the roughly 17 million sales that had been the industry norm in the years leading up to the coronavirus pandemic. “As the market closes out 2022 and we look to the year ahead, there is little reason to believe retail vehicle sales will increase in any meaningful way," Charlie Chesbrough, Cox Automotive's senior economist, said in a statement. "With high auto loan rates in place and inflationary pressures on American consumers, vehicle affordability will continue to put downward pressure on the U.S. auto market.” Bucking the trend, General Motors Co. reported that 2022 sales were up 2.5% to 2.3 million units as the Detroit automaker reclaimed its title as the No. 1 U.S. auto seller. Stellantis NV saw sales fall 13% from 2021, to 1.5 million units. Toyota's sales of 2.1 million vehicles were down 10%. Kia Corp., Hyundai Motor Co., Honda Motor Co., Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. and Subaru of America Inc. all reported sales declines for the year. Edmunds reported new data this week reflecting how expensive it has become for consumers to purchase a vehicle: the average annual percentage rate on new financed vehicle rose to 6.5% in the fourth quarter and some 15.7% of consumers who bought a new car in that period committed to a monthly payment of $1,000 or more — the highest rate ever. "Although we have seen an increase in rates, we are still experiencing a strong amount of pent-up demand right now as evidenced in a strong December industry, and Ford's sales being up 3% year-over-year (last month)," Ford spokesman Said Deep said via email, noting the record retail orders Ford has to kick off the year. "We are monitoring rates as we always do to be competitive in the industry." Meanwhile, the F-Series pickup truck lineup, Ford's cash cow, recorded sales of 653,957 trucks last year — down nearly 10% from 2021 but enough to retain its decades-long streak as America's best-selling truck and overall vehicle. The automaker reported that F-Series had its best monthly sales performance of the year in December with 75,076 trucks sold. Ford noted that improved inventory flow led to stronger sales in December, particularly with F-Series. The automaker ended the year with 398,000 units in inventory, or a 60-day supply. GM's Chevy Silverado reported 523,249 sales, while Ram trucks had 468,344 sales. To close the year, Ford had more than 245,000 orders for the new 2023 Super Duty, which is part of the F-Series franchise. Overall, Ford reported having a record 329,000 retail orders for model-year 2023 vehicles, up nearly 70% over 2022 model-year vehicles as the automaker increasingly moves to a model in which customers order their vehicles in advance. For the popular Bronco that launched in 2021, Ford reported sales of 10,412 units in December and said the SUV's share of its segment climbed to its highest level since launch. The company sold 117,057 Broncos last year. The Bronco Sport, the smaller sibling of the Bronco, notched just under 100,000 sales for the year, down 8% year-over-year. Explorer, one of the most popular Ford brand SUVs, saw sales slip 5.5% for the year and 7.8% in December. Expedition sales were up nearly 11% in December but down 24% for the year. In the truck segment, Ranger sales were down nearly 40% in 2022, while sales of the popular Maverick, launched in late 2021, totaled 74,370 in its first full sales year. The Blue Oval maintained its streak, now at 44 years, of having the best-selling commercial van lineup in the U.S. The results were led by sales of the popular Transit van. Lincoln, Ford's luxury brand, reported sales that were down 4% for the year but up 17.3% in December. Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA Research, on Thursday maintained his "buy" rating on Ford shares and his 12-month price target of $16 per share. The automaker's stock closed up 2% Thursday to $12.25. Nelson noted that Ford's 2.2% sales decline outperformed the industry's 8.8% decline. "We remain favorably inclined toward Ford given its strong balance sheet, generous dividend yield (5.0%), and it coming off a year in which the shares declined by 42%," he wrote, "underperforming the S&P 500's 19% drop in 2022, but well ahead of the performance of EV pure plays, such as Tesla (-65%), Rivian (-82%), and Lucid (-82%)."
|
Ford Hits Back at Tesla The legacy automaker is determined not to let Tesla grow its already huge market share in EVs. The legacy carmaker, which is on a major offensive in the electric vehicle market, is determined to compete head-on with the sector leader in terms of profitability, market value, production and sales. The brand with the blue oval intends to battle Tesla in all markets, even those where the group of charismatic and whimsical Elon Musk has a big advantage, such as China. China is the largest automobile market in the world and also the most important when it comes to electric vehicles. The tax credits and aid given to consumers and manufacturers to facilitate the adoption of low-emission vehicles also makes it an ideal battleground for any vehicle manufacturer wishing to establish itself in this very lucrative segment of the automotive industry. Ford and Tesla compete there in particular on the niche of electric SUVs. Ford's weapon is the Ford Mustang Mach-E, while Tesla has its best-selling Model Y. The group led by Jim Farley has just made a surprising decision. This amounts to lowering the prices of the different versions of the Mustang Mach-E in the country. The manufacturer offers four versions of this EV. The initial price of this model is RMB 275,900 ($37,911) for the RWD Standard Range, while it rises to RMB 389,900 ($53,576) for the GT First Edition model. Ford has announced on social network WeChat that the price of the four versions of the Mustang Mach-E produced in China since October 2021 has now dropped. The reduction varies between 5% and 9%, which allows the two cheapest versions the benefit of the subsidy of RMB 11,088 ($1,523.62) granted to battery electric vehicles (Bev) in the country. The Standard Range RWD now costs RMB 249,900 ($34,339), down 9.4%. The RWD Long Range sees its initial price decrease by 9% to RMB 288,900 ($39,698). The cost of the RWD Premium decreases by 5.4% to RMB 349,900 ($48,080). And finally the GT sees its price decrease by 5.1% to RMB 369,900 ($50,828). Ford's price cut comes just months after a price hike between RMB 7,000 and RMB 22,500 last May of the Mustang Mach-E in China. The Dearborn, Mich.-based company does not explain what led to the new pivot. In the announcement on WeChat, the automotive group said it has the two cheapest versions in stock. This information suggests that there is an imbalance between supply and demand. Ford did not respond to a request for comment. Stay Competitive Importantly, Ford's move comes just days after a similar move by Tesla that lowered prices in China to between 5% and 9%. Tesla markets three versions of the Model Y in China. The base model, the Model Y RWD has been selling for the base price of RMB 288,900 ($39,698) since Oct. 24. Last week, EV maker Aito which is backed by Huawei, also cut prices for its vehicles. Ford is therefore aligning itself with its competitors to remain as competitive. Ford and Tesla's moves bring their vehicle price ranges back to levels closer to those of early March, with the two groups and other automakers raising prices several times over the past year to adjust to the increase in costs, in particular lithium, which has almost tripled. But Musk and auto industry experts recently said that prices for raw materials have started to fall. Steel and aluminum prices notably fell. The decision in China is the opposite of the situation in the United States where carmakers have still not made a gesture towards consumers after several price hikes aimed to pass on to consumers an unexpected increase in their costs. At the beginning of October, Ford decided to increase the prices of the F-150 Lightning, the electric version of the iconic pickup/truck F-150. |
Auto sales for 2022 expected Kalea Hall After a year plagued by low inventory on dealer lots, 2022 is expected to end with automakers selling just under 14 million new vehicles for the lowest sales in more than a decade, according to Kelley Blue Book estimates released this week. Automakers will report their full-year, fourth-quarter and monthly sales next week. Full-year sales should finish near 13.9 million, which is the lowest level the industry's seen since 2011's 12.7 million sales when the U.S. economy was still recovering from the Great Recession. Sales in pandemic year 2020 were 14.6 million. The decline is the result of supply chain issues and now lowering demand as a result of higher prices and interest rates. Now that supply is starting to rebound slowly for some automakers, demand has started to soften in a higher interest-rate environment. “This December, there were fewer giant red bows than dealers would have liked,” said Charles Chesbrough, senior economist at Cox Automotive Inc., a vehicle information company that owns Kelley Blue Book, in a statement. “Given the large improvement in supply levels, it seems likely that rising interest rates are now constraining demand in the retail auto market. With record-high prices and elevated loan rates, the pool of potential new-vehicle buyers is shrinking.” The Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates throughout the year to tamp down inflation. The Fed most recently raised the base interest rate a half a percentage point to a target between 4.25% and 4.5%, marking the highest level in 15 years, CNBC reported. The increases have made auto loan costs the highest they've been in more than 20 years, which has pushed some shoppers out of the market, according to Cox. In fact, since October, the sales pace has declined significantly by nearly 2 million units. Heading into 2023, Cox analysts and others are expecting the economy to see weak growth given the high interest rates. New-vehicle sales should "increase modestly," according to Cox, with growth in fleet sales expected. |
‘Schemes for profiting’: Privatizers Beloved as it is, medicare has always been endangered, threatened by those who prefer that the vast health-care field be open for private profit. Toronto Star Ontario Premier Doug Ford is hoping you’ll see his health-care fight with Ottawa as just more federal-provincial mud wrestling, rather than as a battle for the country’s heart and soul. That may sound lofty, but if anything could be said to represent this country’s heart and soul, it’s our public health-care system. In 2004, when the CBC ran a six-week TV series to determine who could be crowned “the Greatest Canadian” in history, more than 1.2 million votes were cast. In the end, Canadians passed over prime ministers, wartime generals and inspirational figures like Terry Fox, to select Tommy Douglas, the father of medicare. Canadians appear to have a special fondness for a system that, quite simply, enshrines access to health care as based on need, not money. In an age dominated by billionaires and their extravagance (and idiocy), this unadorned, egalitarian principle of medicare shines like the brightest star in a dark and deranged firmament. But, beloved as it is, medicare has always been endangered, threatened by those who prefer that the vast health-care field be open for private profit. Back in 1960 when Douglas, then premier of Saskatchewan, introduced the first public medical insurance system in North America, local doctors staged a bitter, three-week strike. They had backing from business, the Canadian Medical Association, and strong financial support from the American Medical Association, which was determined to prevent public medicine from establishing a beachhead in North America. Remarkably, Douglas prevailed and, in 1966, Parliament voted for a Canada-wide medical insurance system by a stunning margin of 177-2. But the privatizing forces have never given up. Over the years, they’ve launched pricey court challenges to medicare and enlisted support from politicians — both Conservative and Liberal — who’ve helped by underfunding the public system. Now, with hospitals overwhelmed by the pandemic and years of underfunding, Ford and other premiers see a splendid opportunity to shift the blame for today’s serious health-care crisis to Ottawa, and advance their privatization agendas in the process. The premiers argue, correctly, that the federal contribution to health care has dropped significantly over the years. The Trudeau government accepts that Ottawa must increase its contribution. The real battle is over whether there will be strings attached. The premiers don’t like strings. But without strings, the floodgates will open to privatization. This is particularly true in Ontario and Alberta, where staunchly pro-business premiers appear to have learned nothing from the disastrous privatization results in areas like long-term care, which is now dominated by corporate nursing home chains. Care is often so inadequate that, at the height of the pandemic, the Canadian military was brought in to manage some of the worst private facilities. Privatizers basically subscribe to a theory sometimes called “the tragedy of the commons” — the notion that humans are, by nature, purely self-interested, so society should be organized around private property and the marketplace, with everyone looking out for themselves. But the anthropologist Karl Polanyi (as well as the ancient philosopher Aristotle) came to a different conclusion: while it’s true that humans are self-interested, we are social animals first and foremost, reliant on society for our survival, sustenance and well-being. Yes, we fight — but mostly we co-operate. At our best, we devise collective solutions which benefit us all — like public health care and education — to ensure we all have a chance to live healthy, educated lives and that each of us has a shot at developing to our fullest potential. Rather than tragedy, our public health-care system represents the triumph of the commons. This isn’t just wishful thinking. Most advanced nations, Canada included, have developed successful public health-care systems. Imagine how much more successful these systems would be if they weren’t constantly undermined and sabotaged by privatizers and their political allies. We must never let the privatizers rob us of what we can achieve collectively. We must never allow their limited view of human nature — and their schemes for profiting from it — confine us to the grim, every-woman-for-herself world of the private marketplace. |
Lawrence Paul GayJUNE 22, 1955 – DECEMBER 24, 2022
Larry Gay Passes away On behalf of of all the active and retired members of Ford Unifor Larry worked many years at Ford Bramalea before transferring to Larry's sudden passing came as a big shock to everyone.
|
2022 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2021 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2020 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2019 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2018 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2017 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2016 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2015 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2014 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2013 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2012 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2011 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2010 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2009 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
2008 MONTHLY ARCHIVES |
|||
